Upload
alexandrina-ward
View
218
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
GMP-CEED Fund 2016
Introductory Stakeholder Workshops
July 8, GMP Montpelier Service CenterJuly 14, GMP Rutland Operations Headquarters
2
Welcome & Agenda Review
CEED Fund Overview
Stakeholder Proposal Process
Proposal Review Process
Stakeholder Q&A
Adjourn
Agenda for Today’s Workshop
3
Welcome & Agenda Review
CEED Fund Overview
Stakeholder Proposal Process
Proposal Review Process
Stakeholder Q&A
Adjourn
Agenda for Today’s Workshop
4
CEED Fund Overview
Total of $21M to be invested:
$6M (W) by 12/1/12
$4M (W) by 12/1/13
*$2M (T) by 12/1/13
$9M (O) by 12/31/17
$10M
$2M
$9M
VT Weatherization Program (W)
Thermal Efficiency (T)
Other Projects (O)
CEED Fund created in CVPS/GMP merger docket
* for customers who do not qualify for VT’s Weatherization program
CEED Fund Overview
5
Elec-tric
$1,198,000 37%
Thermal $2,023,258
63%
2013 Annual Plan by Investment Type
Commer-cial
$1,509,789 47%
Res-iden-tial,
$1,711,469 53%
2013 Annual Plan by Customer Class
Com
mercial, $2,140,750 84%
Residen-tial $421,631
16%
2014 Annual Plan by Customer Class
Electric
, $2,057,000
80%
Therma
l, $505,381 20%
2014 Annual Plan by Investment Type
Commercial $3,473,797 100%
2015 Annual Plan by Customer Class
Elec-tric, $3,098,797,
89%
New Tech
, $375,00
0, 11%
2015 Annual Plan by Investment Type
CEED Fund Overview
6
Resi-den-tial,
$173,511,6
3544%
Commercial $143,963,59837%
Indus-trial,
$76,575,67019%
Customer Class Breakdown
Commercial, $7,065,139
38%
Res-idential, 11,686,483
62%
Currently Committed Funds by Customer Class
Electric, $6,353,797 34%
Therma
l, $12,022,825 64%
New
Technolo-
gies$375,0002%
Currently Committed Funds by Investment Type
7
VT State Efficiency programs◦ $6M Weatherization Program (2012)◦ $4M Weatherization Program (2013)
2013 Stakeholder Process◦ $2M Thermal Efficiency
Home Performance with Energy Star (VEIC) Business Existing Facilities (VEIC) Condominium Efficiency (Shelter Analytics) Cold-Climate Heat Pumps (VEIC)
◦ $1.2M Electric Efficiency EverGreen Revolving Loan Fund (VEIC) Greenhouse Biomass (VT Agency of Agriculture) Direct Install Farm Efficiency (EnSave)
◦ Other Evaluate State Screening Tool for Renewables (GEEG, Seddon)
Current Investments Deployed
8
2014 Stakeholder Process
◦ $1.775M Electric Efficiency Business Existing Facilities (VEIC) EverGreen Revolving Loan Fund (VEIC)
◦ $282k Innovation (deferred to 2015) Farm-Phosphorous runoff mitigation (NativeEnergy)
◦ Continuation of some 2013 programs
Current Investments Deployed
9
2015 Stakeholder Process◦ $3.09M Electric Efficiency
Business Existing Facilities (VEIC) EverGreen Revolving Loan Fund (VEIC) Ozone Laundry Retrofits (EnSave)
◦ $375k New Technologies Farm-Phosphorous runoff mitigation (NativeEnergy) EV Charging Stations in Downtowns (VEIC)
Current Investments Deployed
10
Eligible Investments◦ New and existing electric efficiency programs;
◦ Renewable and clean energy programs;
◦ Demand Resources; and
◦ New and emerging technologies
◦ Primary Target for 2016 remains commercial sector electrical efficiency and innovative investments, HOWEVER, CEED is nearing its overall NSB targets and new technology & innovative programs can play an expanded role
CEED Fund Overview
11
Investments must achieve Net Societal Benefits (NSB) of at least 1.2 times the amount invested
“But/For” test - investment or project would not otherwise have been undertaken or fully funded absent the CEED Fund investment
Benefits/investments accrue to legacy CVPS customers in approximate proportion to customer class revenue
Appropriate investments identified through stakeholder process
CEED Fund Requirements
12
Welcome & Agenda Review
CEED Fund Overview
Stakeholder Proposal Process
Proposal Review Process
Stakeholder Q&A
Adjourn
Agenda for Today’s Workshop
13
GMP invites potential partners to propose their best ideas for achieving maximum customer benefits under the program
Stakeholder process is collaborative, but also competitive -- limited funds are available for efficiency investments
Stakeholders will present proposals for discussion at the August workshops
Francis Wyatt of Green Energy Economics Group - energy efficiency and planning tool expert will assist GMP in assuring stakeholder proposals are fairly evaluated
GMP will solicit input and recommendations from stakeholders on proposed investments
All participants will get feedback on their proposals from GMP (not other participants)
Proposal guide and worksheet available for participants
Deadlines for submitting proposals will be strictly observed
Stakeholder Proposal Process
14
Workshop aids are available on the GMP website to help stakeholders participate◦ Workshop Slide Deck
◦ Participant Proposal Guide
◦ Proposal Questionnaire (attached to Proposal Guide)
◦ 2012 GMP Efficiency Fund Report
If stakeholders find valuable, GMP will conduct an NSB workshop to assist stakeholders in understanding and working with the state planning tool
Q&A to be posted on GMP website and updated as new questions come in
http://www.greenmountainpower.com/innovative/ceed_fund/
Stakeholder Proposal Process
15
Proposed Schedule
Wednesday, July 8, 2015 Tuesday, July 14, 2015 Tuesday, July 21, 2015 Friday, August 21, 2015
Introductory Workshop #1 Introductory Workshop #2NSB Workshop
(if desired by Stakeholders)Stakeholders Submit Program
Proposals
Days Between Milestones 6 7 31
Tuesday, September 8, 2015 Friday, September 25, 2015 Wednesday, October 7, 2015 Friday, October 30, 2015
Project Review Meeting Stakeholder Comments Due GMP Finalizes Program SelectionFile 2015 Annual Plan with
PSB
18 17 12 23
16
Welcome & Agenda Review
CEED Fund Overview
Stakeholder Proposal Process
Proposal Review Process
Stakeholder Q&A
Adjourn
Agenda for Today’s Workshop
17
Investment criteria consistent with PSB CEED Fund requirements
Aggregate costs subtracted from aggregate benefits◦ Costs include: CEED investment, participating customer investment,
project delivery costs, performance monitoring, benefits measurement and reporting and any other administrative cost charged by any party relating to the investment.
◦ Benefits include: Energy and capacity savings, avoided infrastructure investments, reduced supply risk, savings as compared to other technologies, environmental benefits, economic development benefits and other customer benefits.
A variety of factors will inform which projects are selected including the amount of NSB, number of customers served, customer class, certainty and promptness of achieving benefits, etc.
Proposal Review