Upload
doctor
View
31
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Vorticity and the Phase Diagram of Cuprates Lu Li, J. G. Checkelsky, N.P.O. Princeton Univ. Yayu Wang, Princeton U., U.C. Berkeley M. J. Naughton, Boston College S. Ono, S. Komiya, Yoichi Ando, CRI, Elec. Power Inst., Tokyo S. Uchida, Univ. Tokyo Genda Gu , Brookhaven National Lab. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
1. Introduction2. Vortex Nernst effect3. Enhanced Diamagnetism4. Fragile London rigidity T>Tc5. Low-temp. Quantum Vortex Liquid State
Vorticity and the Phase Diagram of Cuprates
Lu Li, J. G. Checkelsky, N.P.O. Princeton Univ.Yayu Wang, Princeton U., U.C. Berkeley
M. J. Naughton, Boston CollegeS. Ono, S. Komiya, Yoichi Ando, CRI, Elec. Power Inst., Tokyo
S. Uchida, Univ. Tokyo Genda Gu, Brookhaven National Lab
Hong Kong Univ, Dec. 2006
1. (1975-80) Sliding charge density waves (LRA)Pinning and Depinning, FLR length
2. (1980-84) Gang of four, weak localization, Magnetoresistance, dephasing
3. (1987-2000)RVB and Gauge theories of cuprate pairing (NL, WL)
4. (1995-98)Thermal conductivity of Dirac quasiparticlesThermal Hall effect and qp-vortex scattering
5. (2000 -- )Strong fluctuations in pseudogap state
BC
AD
Thanks, Patrick!
holes = 1/2
Phase diagram of cuprates
T pseudogap
0 0.05 0.25
T*
Tc
Mott insulator
Fermiliquid
doping x (fraction of sites with holes)
vortex liquid
dSCAF
Spontaneous vorticity destroys superfluidity
Josephson Effect, phase-slip and Nernst signal
t
VJ
2
Ph
ase
dif
fere
nce
Passage of a vortex Phase diff. jumps by 2
Integrate VJ to give dc signalprop. to nv
JeV2 = 2h nV
Josephson Eq.
Nernst effect experiment
Vortices move in a temperature gradientPhase slip generates Josephson voltage
2eVJ = 2h nV
EJ = B x v
ey = Ey /| T | (Nernst signal)
Tc
Nernst signal persists highabove Tc
Bi 2212 (UD)
Wang et al. PRB 2001
Giant Nernst signal in cuprates
overdoped optimal underdoped
Wang, Li, NPO PRB 2006
Nernst signal
eN = Ey /| T |
Vortex-Nernst signal in Bi 2201 Wang, Li, Ong PRB 2006
• Condensate amplitude persists to Tonset > Tc
• Nernst signal confined to SC dome• Vorticity defines Nernst region
Nernstregion
Kosterlitz Thouless transition in 2D superconductor
Unbinding ofvortex-antivortex
F = U - TSFree energy gain
vortex density
vortex
antivortex
Mean-field phase diagram
H
2H-NbSe2
T
Hc2
Hc1
Tc0
normal
vortex solid
liquid
0
Hm
Meissner state
H
Cuprate phase diagram
4 T
7 Kvortexsolid
vortexliquid
Hc2
Tc
100 T
100 K
Hm
Vortex unbindingin H = 0
1. Vorticity persists high above Tc
2. Confined to SC “dome”
3. Loss of long-range phase coherence at Tc by spontaneous vortex creation (not gap closing)
4. Pseudogap intimately related to vortex liquid state
Thermodynamic evidence?
Implications of Giant Nernst signal
Supercurrents follow contours of condensate
Js = -(eh/m) x ||2 z
Diamagnetic currents in vortex liquid
Torque magnetometry
Torque on moment: = m × B
Deflection of cantilever: = k
crystal
B
m×
Mike Naughton (Boston College)
Tc
UnderdopedBi 2212
Wang et al.PRL 2005
Magnetization curves in underdoped Bi 2212
Tc
Separatrix Ts
Wang et al.Cond-mat/05
Wang et al.PRL 2005
At high T, M scales with Nernst signal eN
Lu Li et al., unpubl.HM
M = - [Hc2 – H] / (22 –1)
Hc2
UN Bi 2212
“Fragile” London rigidity above Tc
Above Tc, M/H is singularM ~ -H1/is divergent)
Lu Li et al. Europhys Lett 2005
Non-analytic magnetization above Tc
M ~ H1/
Fractional-exponentregion
In hole-doped cuprates
1. Large region in phase diagram above Tc domewith enhanced Nernst signal
2. Associated with vortex excitations (not Gaussian)
3. Confirmed by torque magnetometry
4. Transition at Tc is 3D version of KT transition (loss of phase coherence)
5. Upper critical field behavior confirms conclusion
Nernstregion
The phase diagramin x-H plane at low T
H
x0 0.30.1 0.2
?
Magnetization in lightly doped La2-xSrxCuO4
Lu Li et al., unpubl.
Evidence for robust diagmagnetism for x < xc
Lu Li et al., unpubl.
Diamagnetism coexists with growing spin population
Doping x
Lu Li et al., unpubl.
Debye Waller dependence Hm(T) = H0 exp(-T/T0)
Vortex solid-to-liquid transition for x < xc
Lu Li et al., unpubl.Low temp Phase Diagram
Critical Point
H
x0 0.30.1 0.2
Low-temperature vortex liquid
1. Vortex solid surrounded by vortex liquid at 0.35 K
2. Sharp quantum transition at xc = 0.055. Quantum vortices destroy phase coherence
3. At 0.35 K, pair condensate survives without phase rigidity even for x = 0.03
4. Melting of vortex solid appears to be classical at 0.35 K (Debye-Waller like).
Summary
1. Nernst region is suffused with vorticity, enhanced diamagnetism and finite pairing amplitude
2. Extends from Tc to Tonset < T*
3. Nernst region dominates lower temp part ofPseudogap state
4. Depairing field Hc2 and binding energy arevery large
Strong pairing potential but soft phase rigidity
5. Vortex-liquid state is ground state below xc
Bi 2201
END