Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
©2013 Waters Corporation 1
Introduction to Waters Sample Preparation
and Chromatography Columns Tools and
Techniques
Robert Frost
Consumables Private Market Manager UK
©2013 Waters Corporation 2
Agenda
Tools and Techniques for Sample Preparation
Column Technologies
©2013 Waters Corporation 3
Tools and techniques for Sample Preparation
The Importance of Solid Phase Extraction
How SPE Works
Device Design and Tips for Processing Samples
Chromatographic Sorbent Choices
©2013 Waters Corporation 4
The New SPE “Textbook”
Part #: 715003405
212 pages, paperback
Size: 8.25 x 11”
>150 full color figures and diagrams
Chapter Titles
– Benefits of SPE in Sample Preparation
– SPE is LC
– Key Terms and Calculations
– In the Lab
– Method Development
– Troubleshooting
– Appendix: Glossary of SPE and LC Terms
– Appendix: Oasis Sorbent Technology for SPE
– Appendix: Applications
– Appendix: Additional Reference Materials
©2013 Waters Corporation 5
Why do Sample Preparation?
Issue: Plugging
Cause: solid particulates
Impact: may limit instrument/system up-time
©2013 Waters Corporation 6
Sample Prep Tools
For solid particulates:
– Filters
– Centrifuge
For sample matrix components:
– Precipitation
– Liquid-Liquid Extraction {LLE}
– Solid-Phase Extraction {SPE}
©2013 Waters Corporation 7
Why do Sample Prep?
Issue: Complicated analytical results / too much variability and
potential resolution issues
Cause: analytes contained in a complex sample matrix
Impact:
Quantitation errors: slight changes might resolute in loss of
resolution of critical pairs
May reduce instrument/system up-time
AU
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
Minutes
0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 45.00 50.00 55.00 60.00
©2013 Waters Corporation 8
Improve Analytical Results: Example #1
AU
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
Minutes
0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 45.00 50.00 55.00 60.00
AU
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
Minutes
0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 45.00 50.00 55.00 60.00
Only
need to analyze
these
peaks
Improvement: Remove unnecessary peaks
©2013 Waters Corporation 9
Improve Analytical Results: Example #2
PD
A
(0.0
1 A
UFS)
1 2
Sample Prep
0 10 5
1
2
Sample
Minutes
Improvement: Remove Baseline interferences
©2013 Waters Corporation 10
Improve Analytical Results: Example #3
Spiked Sample
Blank Sample Matrix
1 2
3 0.004 AU
10 8 6 4 2 0 min.
0.0
0
0.0
0
2.0
0
2.0
0
4.0
0
4.0
0
6.0
0
6.0
0
8.0
0
8.0
0
10.0
0
10.0
0
Min
ute
s
Min
ute
s
Spiked Sample
Blank Sample Matrix
1
3
2 0.004 AU
Peak 1 has baseline contamination from sample matrix
Peaks 2 and 3 are clean
Peak 1
is clean
With SPE Clean-up
Improvement: Remove Baseline interferences
©2013 Waters Corporation 11
Why do Sample Prep?
Issue: not enough sensitivity
Cause:
Analyte concentration in original sample matrix
TOO LOW to measure by instrument
Impact:
Quantitation errors
©2013 Waters Corporation 12
Improve Analytical Results: Example #4
Concentration of Analyte in
Original Sample TOO LOW
(difficult to quantitate)
Time 0 1 2 3 4 5
©2013 Waters Corporation 13
Improve Analytical Results: Example #4
Concentration of Analyte
in Original Sample
TOO LOW
(difficult to quantitate )
Time 0 1 2 3 4 5
Utilize SPE Chromatographic Bed
to Trace Concentrate the Original Sample
for that Analyte -
Obtain Good Response
©2013 Waters Corporation 14
Why do Sample Prep?
Issue:
– Not enough sensitivity
Cause:
– For MS detection: minimize ion suppression/enhancement
Impact:
– Quantitation Errors
©2013 Waters Corporation 15
260 280 300 320 340 360 380 400 420 440 460 480 500 520 540 560 580 600 620m/z0
100
%
0
100
%
Scan ES+
591.7
354.4 518.5
472.6 485.5 609.6
Scan ES+ 354.4
260.2
291.3
609.6
485.6472.6
411.5591.6
50/50 Water/ACN + human plasma supernatant
50/50 Water/ACN
260.2 - 97 %
291.2 - 96 %
354.4 - 86 %
411.4 - 93 %
472.6 - 93 %
485.6 - 95 %
591.6 - 89 %
609.5 - 93 %
260 280 300 320 340 360 380 400 420 440 460 480 500 520 540 560 580 600 620m/z0
100
%
0
100
%
Scan ES+
591.7
354.4 518.5
472.6 485.5 609.6
Scan ES+ 354.4
260.2
291.3
609.6
485.6472.6
411.5591.6
50/50 Water/ACN + human plasma supernatant
50/50 Water/ACN
260 280 300 320 340 360 380 400 420 440 460 480260 280 300 320 340 360 380 400 420 440 460 480 500 520 540 560 580 600 620m/z0
100
%
500 520 540 560 580 600 620m/z0
100
%
0
100
%
Scan ES+
591.7
354.4 518.5
472.6 485.5 609.6
Scan ES+ 354.4
260.2
291.3
609.6
485.6472.6
411.5591.6
50/50 Water/ACN + human plasma supernatant
50/50 Water/ACN
260.2 - 97 %
291.2 - 96 %
354.4 - 86 %
411.4 - 93 %
472.6 - 93 %
485.6 - 95 %
591.6 - 89 %
609.5 - 93 %
Analytes in human plasma with only
Protein Precipitation Standards in aqueous solution give acceptable response
What is Ion Suppression?
©2013 Waters Corporation 16
260 280 300 320 340 360 380 400 420 440 460 480 500 520 540 560 580 600 620m/z0
100
%
0
100
%
Scan ES+
591.7
354.4 518.5
472.6 485.5 609.6
Scan ES+ 354.4
260.2
291.3
609.6
485.6472.6
411.5591.6
50/50 Water/ACN + human plasma supernatant
50/50 Water/ACN
260.2 - 97 %
291.2 - 96 %
354.4 - 86 %
411.4 - 93 %
472.6 - 93 %
485.6 - 95 %
591.6 - 89 %
609.5 - 93 %
260 280 300 320 340 360 380 400 420 440 460 480 500 520 540 560 580 600 620m/z0
100
%
0
100
%
Scan ES+
591.7
354.4 518.5
472.6 485.5 609.6
Scan ES+ 354.4
260.2
291.3
609.6
485.6472.6
411.5591.6
50/50 Water/ACN + human plasma supernatant
50/50 Water/ACN
260 280 300 320 340 360 380 400 420 440 460 480260 280 300 320 340 360 380 400 420 440 460 480 500 520 540 560 580 600 620m/z0
100
%
500 520 540 560 580 600 620m/z0
100
%
0
100
%
Scan ES+
591.7
354.4 518.5
472.6 485.5 609.6
Scan ES+ 354.4
260.2
291.3
609.6
485.6472.6
411.5591.6
50/50 Water/ACN + human plasma supernatant
50/50 Water/ACN
260.2 - 97 %
291.2 - 96 %
354.4 - 86 %
411.4 - 93 %
472.6 - 93 %
485.6 - 95 %
591.6 - 89 %
609.5 - 93 %
Analytes in human plasma with only Protein Precipitation
Analyte standards in aqueous solution
% Loss
Complex Sample Matrix: Ion Suppression
©2013 Waters Corporation 17
Improve Analytical Results: Example #5
80% ion suppression
Minimal ion suppression
0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00
%
0
100
0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00
%
0
100 MRM
472.2 > 436.4 1.27e6
1.89
MRM 472.2 > 436.4
1.27e6 1.91
SPE with Oasis
® MCX
Protein Precipitation (PPT)
Note: These samples are dried and reconstituted. Gradient time = 1.5 min
MRM for Terfenadine
Significant ion suppression observed for analytes that co-elute with residual matrix
components using just PPT.
©2013 Waters Corporation 18
Do all Sample Preparation Techniques Give the Same Result?
0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00
%
0
100
0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00
%
0
100 MRM
472.2 > 436.4 1.27e6
1.89
MRM 472.2 > 436.4
1.27e6 1.91
80% ion suppression
Minimal ion suppression B (SPE) (Oasis® MCX)
A (PPT)
Note: These samples are dried and reconstituted. Gradient time = 1.5 min
No loss in signal observed for analytes when the interferences, which cause the suppression,
are removed by SPE.
MRM for Terfenadine
©2013 Waters Corporation 19
The Ultimate Goal is to make your analytical lab more productive
- Lower Limits of Detection
- Run more samples with less time
- Minimize costs in manpower and equipment maintenance
Goals of Sample Preparation: Summary
To remove interferences for
– Better chromatography
– More confident analytical results
– Longer column lifetime
– Less instrument downtime
To enrich sample for
– Higher detection sensitivity
To make sample more compatible for separation and detection
– Matching solvent strength
– Eliminating ion-suppression in LC/MS analysis
©2013 Waters Corporation 20
Agenda
The Importance of Solid Phase Extraction
How SPE Works
Device Design and Tips for Processing Samples
Chromatographic Sorbent Choices
©2013 Waters Corporation 21
x
Yellow is the earliest eluting analyte “band”, it “likes” the mobile phase,
has very low ‘k” (little retention)
Blue is well retained, it “likes” the particles, has high “k” (high
retention - “captured”)
Mix Yellow, Red and Blue Dyes together to create what appears,
to our eyes as a “Black” Sample
Food
Dyes
How a Chromatographic Column Works -- “BANDS”
©2013 Waters Corporation 22
Yellow is the earliest eluting analyte “band” - it “likes” the mobile phase,
has very low ‘k” (little retention)
Blue is well retained - it “likes” the particles,
has high “k” (high retention - “captured”)
How a Chromatographic Column Works -- “BANDS”
©2013 Waters Corporation 23
Band Migration on an SPE Cartridge
SPE follows the same principles as LC
Blue
Red Yellow
Sample
©2013 Waters Corporation 24
Agenda
The Importance of Solid Phase Extraction
How SPE Works
Device Design and Tips for Processing Samples
Chromatographic Sorbent Choices
©2013 Waters Corporation 25
SPE Configurations from Waters
Syringe Barrel Cartridge
Standard 96-Well Plate
On-line SPE Devices
melution 96-Well Plate
©2013 Waters Corporation 26
Sample Processing: Gravity
©2013 Waters Corporation 27
Stop Cock
flow control valves-
to prevent
drying – out effect
Male-male Adapter
Syringe Adapter
Vacuum Manifold
Sample Processing: Glass Vacuum Manifold
©2013 Waters Corporation 28
Vacuum Manifold
Sample Processing: Large Liquid Volumes
©2013 Waters Corporation 29
Sample Processing: 96-well Plate
Set-up for typical 96-well plates Under vacuum, a properly seated well-plate should move down and the tips will extend into the wells of the collection plate.
Collection Plate
©2013 Waters Corporation 30
Sample Processing: Positive Pressure
©2013 Waters Corporation 31
Tip: Cartridge Stacking
Multiple cartridges can be stacked for
a mixed-mode approach
2 of the SAME
for More Capacity
2 Different
Sorbents for
2 Dimensional
Selectivity
©2013 Waters Corporation 32
Sample Processing: Positive Pressure Manifold
©2013 Waters Corporation 33
Agenda
The Importance of Solid Phase Extraction
How SPE Works
Device Design and Tips for Processing Samples
Chromatographic Sorbent Choices
©2013 Waters Corporation 34
SPE Terminology
Sorbent -- Chromatographic packing material (Stationary Phase)
Retention Mechanisms: 1. Reversed Phase (RP) 2. Normal Phase (NP) 3. Ion-Exchange (IEX)
Syringe Barrel Style
Sorbent
Filter/Frit
Filter/Frit
©2013 Waters Corporation 35
Sorbents for SEP-PAK® Products Silica and Alumina Based
©2013 Waters Corporation 36
Sorbents for SEP-PAK® Products Reversed-Phase
©2013 Waters Corporation 37
Sorbents for SEP-PAK® Products Normal Phase
©2013 Waters Corporation 38
Sorbents for SEP-PAK® Products Ion-Exchange (Silica Based)
©2013 Waters Corporation 39
Sorbents for SEP-PAK® Products Specialty Phases
©2013 Waters Corporation 40
Hydrophilic
monomer
Lipophilic
monomer
N O
Reversed-phase Retention
Hydrophilic-Lipophilic Balanced Copolymer
Polymeric SPE Sorbent Chemistry: Oasis® HLB
• Water wettable
• Polar retention
• Stable across pH 1-14
• No silanol interactions
• High recoveries for acids, bases and neutrals
Retention of Polars
©2013 Waters Corporation 41
Polymeric SPE Sorbent Chemistries: Oasis® Mixed-mode Ion Exchangers
©2013 Waters Corporation 42
Polymeric SPE Sorbent Chemistries: Oasis® Mixed-mode Ion Exchangers
Strong Cation
RP
Strong Anion
RP
Weak Cation
RP
Weak Anion
RP
Reversed Phase
RP
©2013 Waters Corporation 43
Oasis® 2x4 Method: Acids and Bases
Neutrals
For Bases:
pKa 2-10
Use Oasis® MCX
For Strong Acids
pKa <1.0
Use Oasis® WAX
For Strong Bases
pKa >10
Use Oasis® WCX
For Acids
pKa 2-8
Use Oasis® MAX
Prepare Sample
Condition/Equilibrate
Load Sample
Wash:
5% NH4OH
Elute 1:
100% MeOH
Elute 2:
2% Formic Acid in MeOH
Protocol 2 Prepare Sample
Condition/Equilibrate
Load Sample
Wash:
2% Formic acid
Elute 1:
100% MeOH
Elute 2:
5% NH4OH in MeOH
Protocol 1
Bases Strong
Acids
Strong
Bases Acids
©2013 Waters Corporation 44
Oasis® 2x4 Method: Neutrals
Neutrals
For Bases:
pKa 2-10
Use Oasis® MCX
For Strong Acids
pKa <1.0
Use Oasis® WAX
For Strong Bases
pKa >10
Use Oasis® WCX
For Acids
pKa 2-8
Use Oasis® MAX
Prepare Sample
Condition/Equilibrate
Load Sample
Wash:
5% NH4OH
Elute 1:
100% MeOH
Elute 2:
2% Formic Acid in MeOH
Protocol 2 Prepare Sample
Condition/Equilibrate
Load Sample
Wash:
2% Formic acid
Elute 1:
100% MeOH
Elute 2:
5% NH4OH in MeOH
Protocol 1
Bases Strong
Acids
Strong
Bases Acids
Reversed-phase
Backbone
©2013 Waters Corporation 45
Ostro™ Plate Technology Pass Through Strategy
Specifically Designed for
Phospholipid Removal which, when present,
results in Significant
Ion-Suppression
©2013 Waters Corporation 46
Methodology
Precipitate
Proteins
Held up by
Filters
Phospholipids
Retained
by SPE
Sorbent Bed,
Analytes
Pass Through
Ostro™ Plate Technology Pass Through Strategy
It is possible to work with lower sample volumes (such as
25µL). When doing so you will need a higher
organic solvent to sample ratio, such as
10:1 or 20:1.
The well volume is 1.9 mL, however in order to mix by aspiration, the
maximum volume is 1.4 mL. This translates to a maximum sample size
of 350µL.
Place Ostro plate onto
collection plate
Pipette 50-200µL of
plasma into wells
Forcefully add 2% formic acid in acetonitrile,
3:1 solvent:plasma
(methanol not recommended)
Mix thoroughly by aspirating 3x with pipette
Filter samples using vacuum manifold or
positive pressure manifold
Analyze samples
©2013 Waters Corporation 47
OSTRO™ Plate
- Phospholipid
Removal
- No Method
Development
- Superior
Performance
Competitors
Ostro™ Plate Technology Pass Through Strategy
©2013 Waters Corporation 48
Competitive Techniques: Phospholipids Remaining
MRM of m/z 184-184
Time 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.20 2.40 2.60 2.80
%
0
100
0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.20 2.40 2.60 2.80
%
0
100
0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.20 2.40 2.60 2.80
%
0
100
0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.20 2.40 2.60 2.80
%
0
100 184.4 > 184.4 (Lipid 184) 2.00e8
2.88 2.29 2.21
2.10
1.90
2.60 2.78 2.72
184.4 > 184.4 (Lipid 184) 2.00e8
2.80 2.27
1.90
2.62 2.56 2.68
184.4 > 184.4 (Lipid 184) 2.00e8
1.96 1.90 1.77
184.4 > 184.4 (Lipid 184) 2.00e8
2.84 2.21 1.96 1.75 1.42 1.38
1.32
1.63 1.51
PPT
Ostro™
LLE with MTBE
LLE with 5%
NH4OH in MTBE
©2013 Waters Corporation 49
Agenda
Tools and Techniques for Sample Preparation
Column Technologies
©2013 Waters Corporation 50
Agenda
Introduction
Modern HPLC and UPLC Columns
Maximizing HPLC Performance with XP 2.5 µm Columns
NEW CORTECS UPLC 1.6 & 2.7 µm Columns
Summary
©2013 Waters Corporation 51
Waters Column Product History
Styragel®
µBondapak™
DeltaPak®
1964 1979 1973
1992
Symmetry®
Spherisorb®
Atlantis®
Symmetry® 300
XTerra®
XTerraPrep®
1998
Nova-Pak®
ProteinPakTM
Pico-TagTM
SymmetryShield®
1984
1986
2002
1999 1994 2003
Atlantis® HILIC Silica Prep OBD™ Intelligent SpeedTM
BioSuite™ NanoEase™
2004
ACQUITY UPLC® BEH SunFire™ Columns
PrepPak®
1976
1958
Atlantis® T3 ACQUITY UPLC® HSS T3 AccQTagTM Ultra
BEH130 Columns BEH300 Columns
2006
2005
XBridge™
2007
ACQUITY UPLC® HSS C18 and HSS C18 SB
2008
XBridge™ HILIC
2009
ACQUITY UPLC® BEH Amide ACQUITY UPLC® BEH Glycan XBridge Amide XSelect HSS HPLC Columns
2010
ACQUITY UPLC® BEH200 SEC XSelect CSH HPLC columns
ACQUITY CSH Columns Viridis SFC Columns
ProteinPak High Rs IEX
AccQTagTM
2011
ACQUITY UPLC® HSS Cyano & PFP columns XSelectTM HSS Cyano & PFP columns XP 2.5 µm Columns
2012
ACQUITY UPLC® BEH125 SEC ACQUITY UPC2™ Columns
2013
CORTECS™ Columns ACQUITY UPLC® BEH450 SEC ACQUITY APC™ Columns CSH130 Columns
©2013 Waters Corporation 52
What makes an LC column
reproducible?
A) Sorbents
0
5
10
15
20
25
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
1 . 7 µm ACQUITY UPLC® BEH C18
2 . 5 µm XBridge™ BEH C18 XP
2 . 6 µm Core-Shell C18
Linear Velocity, u (cm/sec)
Pla
te H
eigh
t (H
, 4 s
igm
a)
Acenaphthene, 2.1 x 50 mm columns
70/30 MeCN/H2O, 30 °C, 254 nm
B) Packing C) Engineering
All are CRITICAL!
©2013 Waters Corporation 53
Why Choose a Waters Column?
©2013 Waters Corporation 54
Developing a Waters Column: cGMP Registration
All Waters manufacturing facilities are registered with the FDA for the
manufacture and distribution of class I medical devices, and are ISO
9001:2000 certified. Single source for all Waters columns.
The GMP Quality Systems Regulations cover items such as
— Quality management and organization
— Production, process, packaging and labeling controls
— Document and record controls
As part of the registration process, the FDA may inspect the facilities
every two years for compliance
Taunton, MA, USA:
Particle Synthesis Milford MA, USA:
Hardware Manufacture
Wexford, Ireland:
Device Manufacturing
©2013 Waters Corporation 55
Developing a Waters Column: Hardware Manufacture
Waters produces most of our hardware from raw materials
– Each incoming lot is controlled for material conformity and specification
Each step of the machining process is quality controlled
– The first milling operation automatically:
• Machines the column body to dimension
• Cuts the threads
• Creates unique identifying number
Product hardware must pass: – Material specifications
– Engineering tolerances
– Cosmetic Standards
©2013 Waters Corporation 56
Enabling Expertise Primary Manufacturing for Reproducibility
All modern chromatographic media is manufactured from starting monomers to finished product
Waters has set the industry benchmark for batch-to-batch reproducibility
Stringent monitoring of key parameters assure repeatable and reproducible results year after year
Minimize the risk of method variation due to differences caused by chromatographic media batch or column inconsistency
Process control charts for 85 batches of ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18 demonstrating manufacturing control and long-term repeatability
between material batches over the course of 7 years.
©2013 Waters Corporation 57
Quality Systems Minimize Risk with Dependable Column Performance
Method Validation kits provide
three batches of chromatographic
media [derived from different base
particles] to judge the quality,
reliability and consistency of an
analytical method
Waters uniquely positioned as an
industry partner to minimize risk
©2013 Waters Corporation 58
Developing a Waters Column: Column Packing
Computer controlled real time packing
optimization
Each column configuration is packed on a
dedicated custom designed packing station
– Preparative, analytical and UPLC columns
require different conditions
– Optimized for slurry flow and packing pressure
Every column passes:
– Efficiency test using a specific test mixture
©2013 Waters Corporation 59
The Result
©2013 Waters Corporation 60
Agenda
Introduction
Modern HPLC and UPLC Columns
– Benchmarking System Performance
– Particle Platforms
– Understanding Stationary Phase
Maximizing HPLC Performance with XP 2.5 µm Columns
NEW CORTECS UPLC 1.6 & 2.7 µm Columns
Summary
©2013 Waters Corporation 61
Benchmarking System Performance
Typical Criteria
1. Retention time range or
reproducibility
2. Peak area range or reproducibility
3. Peak tailing range
4. Peak resolution
5. Response
6. System Pressure
Principle of benchmarking:
–Use of a Quality Control Reference Material (QCRM) to evaluate or
check key performance criteria by comparison with data generated
when the system is known to be in good working order
Importance of benchmarking
–Routine use on the analytical system and control charting the data
allows for an understanding of the capability of your system to provide
reliable results and is a useful troubleshooting tool.
©2013 Waters Corporation 62
Quality Control Reference Materials
Requirements for a QCRM Material
– Reproducible Lot to Lot
– Accurate
– Appropriate to analysis type (LCMS, LC-UV)
The quality of the reference material is critical to the
evaluation of analytical data and instrument performance.
Waters has an extensive portfolio of QCRMs designed to
allow scientists to determine if their system is in working
order
AU
0.000
0.010
0.020
0.030
0.040
0.050
Minutes
0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00
Aceto
ne
Naphth
ale
ne
Acenaphth
ene
Compound Type
Acetone (V0) Void Marker
Naphthalene Neutral
Acenaphthene Neutral
Neutrals QCRM: 186006360
©2013 Waters Corporation 63
Versatility of Neutrals QCRM
AU
0.00
0.10
0.20
AU
0.00
0.10
0.20
AU
0.00
0.10
0.20
Minutes
0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00
10mM Ammonium Formate pH 3; Acetonitrile (50/50, v/v)
20mM Potassium Phosphate pH 7; Acetonitrile (50/50, v/v)
10mM Ammonium Bicarbonate pH 10; Acetonitrile (50/50, v/v)
Peak ID: Acetone, Naphthalene, Acenaphthene
AU
0.00
0.10
0.20
AU
0.00
0.10
0.20
AU
0.00
0.10
0.20
Minutes
0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00
ACQUITY UPLC CSH™ C18 1.7 µm
XSelect™ CSH™ C18 3.5 µm
XSelect™ CSH™ C18 5 µm
pH Particle Size
©2013 Waters Corporation 64
Versatility of Neutrals QCRM
Peak ID: Acetone, Naphthalene, Acenaphthene
AU
0.00
0.10
0.20
AU
0.00
0.10
0.20
Minutes
0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00
ACQUITY UPLC® HSS C18
ACQUITY UPLC® CSH C18
AU
0.00
0.10
0.20 ACQUITY UPLC® BEH C18
Hybrid Particle
Silica Particle
Charged Surface Hybrid Particle
CORTECS™ UPLC® C18 1.6 µm
Solid-Core Particle
AU
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
AU
0.00
0.20
AU
0.00
0.20
AU
0.00
0.20
AU
0.00
0.20
Minutes 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00
ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18
ACQUITY UPLC BEH C8
ACQUITY UPLC BEH Shield RP18
ACQUITY UPLC BEH Phenyl
Stationary Phase Particle Substrate
©2013 Waters Corporation 65
Widest Selection of Unique Particle Offering
CORTECS
Solid-Core
Technology
Higher efficiency and
resolution
Increased throughput
at similar resolution
Higher performance
at same backpressure
BEH Technology
Unparalleled pH stability
Mobile phase and
temperature versatility
Seamless scalability
UPLC to HPLC
HSS Technology
Maximum retention
Particle and ligand
selectivity
Seamless scalability
UPLC to HPLC
CSH Technology
Exceptional loading capacity
Superior peak shape
for basic analytes
Seamless scalability
UPLC to HPLC
Waters is the ONLY company that has
fully porous and solid-core sub-2-µm particle columns
©2013 Waters Corporation 66
Column Naming
HPLC UPLC
©2013 Waters Corporation 67
Two Fully-Scalable LC Column Platforms
Family designed and optimized for pH stability
Family designed and optimized for selectivity
1.7 [UPLC], 2.5 XP, 3.5, 5 and 10 µm 1.8 [UPLC], 2.5, 3.5 and 5 µm HSS
1.7 [UPLC], 2.5 XP, 3.5, 5 and 10 µm CSH
©2013 Waters Corporation 68
Excellent general-purpose
HPLC and UPLC columns for
small molecule separations
– Broadest range of compound
classes
– Widest pH range (1 – 12)
– Widest temperature range
– Ultra-low MS bleed
Direct scalability between UPLC
Technology, analytical HPLC and
preparative HPLC
XBridge/BEH Family
Family designed and optimized for
pH stability
1.7 [UPLC], 2.5 XP, 3.5, 5 and 10 µm
©2013 Waters Corporation 69
Ethylene Bridged Hybrid [BEH] Particle
Anal. Chem. 2003, 75, 6781-6788
U.S. Patent No. 6,686,035 B2 Bridged Ethanes within a silica matrix
©2013 Waters Corporation 70
Ethylene Bridged Hybrid [BEH] Chemistries
Rugged, reproducible, fully-scalable column chemistries for
reversed-phase and HILIC separations
– BEH C18: First column choice, widest pH range, LC/MS
– BEH C8: For hydrophobic compounds, widest pH range, LC/MS
– BEH Shield RP18: Embedded carbamate group, alternate
selectivity
– BEH Phenyl: Most stable phenyl column, wide pH range
– BEH HILIC: Unbonded, rugged BEH particle for HILIC separation
of very polar bases
– BEH Amide: General-purpose HILIC column for very polar
compounds such as sugars, saccharides, carbohydrates, etc.
©2013 Waters Corporation 71
Industry Leading pH Stability Column lifetimes in acidic mobile phases
Test conditions: 1% TFA in water (pH 1.0) at 80oC. Comparative separations may not be representative of all applications.
Shorter bar equals longer lifetime under
low pH conditions
©2013 Waters Corporation 72
Industry Leading pH stability Column lifetimes in alkaline mobile phases
High pH mobile phases
(>pH 10) rapidly dissolve
silica-based stationary
phases
Only modern hybrid-based
sorbents, [BEH] and
[CSH], extend the usable
mobile phase pH range from
1-12
Comparative separations may not be representative of all applications.
©2013 Waters Corporation 73
The Importance of Mobile Phase pH: Rapid Method Development
Using a wide mobile
phase pH range is an
effective approach to
change compound
selectivity
Increase selectivity for:
– Acids (Green/Blue)
– Bases (Red/Yellow)
Neutrals (Peak 2) are
largely unaffected by
mobile phase pH
©2013 Waters Corporation 74
XSelect HSS and CSH Family
Family designed and optimized for
selectivity
Multiple particle substrates to solve multiple chromatographic
problems
1.8 [UPLC], 2.5 XP, 3.5 and 5 µm HSS
1.7 [UPLC], 2.5 XP, 3.5, 5 and 10 µm CSH
Highest pressure tolerance; first silica-based particle (1.8 μm) designed for UPLC applications
Alternate selectivities (vs. BEH & CSH particle columns)
Increased retention
Designed for LC/MS
Improved peak shape for basic analytes under low-ionic strength acidic mobile phases
Reduces overload effect
Rapid equilibration; prevents retention time drift with changes in pH
©2013 Waters Corporation 75
Charged Surface Hybrid [CSH] Particles
Step 1 Step 2 Step 3
CHARGED SURFACE HYBRID PROCESS
©2013 Waters Corporation 76
Benefits of CSH Technology: Loading Comparison
AU
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
AU
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
AU
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
Minutes 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6
ACQUITY UPLC® CSH C18
2.1 x 50 mm, 1.7 µm
Fully porous silica C18
2.1 x 50 mm, 1.8 µm
Competitive Core-Shell C18
2.1 x 50 mm, 1.7 µm
Quetiapine (base)
Quetiapine (base)
Quetiapine (base)
Propiophenone (neutral)
Propiophenone (neutral)
Propiophenone (neutral)
Comparative separations may not be representative of all applications
©2013 Waters Corporation 77
CSH and HSS Chemistries
FOUR general-purpose C18 columns for low to neutral pH reversed-
phase separations
– CSH C18: Rapid pH switching for method development
– HSS C18: Superior peak shape & acid stability
– HSS C18 SB: Alternate Selectivity for Basic (SB) compounds
– HSS T3: Enhanced reversed-phase retention of polar compounds
Alternative Selectivity Stationary Phases
– CSH Phenyl-Hexyl: High performance phenyl column, best in additive-
based mobile phases, different selectivity vs BEH Phenyl
– CSH Fluoro-Phenyl: Truly different selectivity, optimized for low pH
separations, enhanced retention of acidic compounds
– HSS PFP: Exceptional selectivity and retention for positional isomers,
halogenated compounds and polar basic compounds
– HSS CN: Stable, normal phase-compatible, reproducible CN chemistry
©2013 Waters Corporation 78 Minutes 0.0 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00
Conditions : Columns: 2.1 x 50 mm Mobile Phase A: 0.1% CF3COOH in H2O Mobile Phase B: 0.08% CF3COOH in ACN Flow Rate: 0.5 mL/min Gradient: Time Profile Curve (min) %A %B 0.0 92 8 6 0.1 92 8 6 4.45 50 50 7 4.86 10 90 6 5.0 92 8 6 6.0 92 8 6 Injection Volume: 1.0 µL Sample Diluent: 50:50 H2O: MeOH with 0.05% CF3COOH Sample Conc.: 100 µg/mL Temperature: 40 oC Detection: UV @ 330 nm Sampling rate: 40 pts/sec Time Constant: 0.1 Instrument: Waters ACQUITY UPLC®, with ACQUITY UPLC® TUV
Compounds 1. Caftaric acid 2. Chlorogenic acid 3. Cynarin 4. Echinacoside 5. Cichoric acid
1 2 4 5 3
BEH C18
BEH C8
BEH Shield RP18
BEH Phenyl
1 2 4
5 3
1 2 4 5 3
1 2 4 5 3
1 2 4 5 3
HSS T3
HSS C18 1 4 3 5 2
Column Selectivity Choices Caffeic Acid Derivatives
1 2 4 5
3 HSS C18 SB
HSS CN
HSS PFP 1 2 3
4 5
1 2
4
3 5
1 2 4 3 5 CSH Phenyl-
Hexyl
1 2
4
3
5
CSH Fluoro-Phenyl
CSH C18 1 2
3,4
5
Comparative separations may not be representative of all applications
©2013 Waters Corporation 79
Agenda
Introduction
Modern HPLC and UPLC Columns
Maximizing HPLC Performance with XP 2.5 µm Columns
NEW CORTECS UPLC 1.6 & 2.7 µm Columns
Summary
©2013 Waters Corporation 80
Maximize HPLC Performance
Increasingly, more organizations realize the business and scientific
advantages of UPLC Technology
Increased availability of UHPLC instruments provides vendor choice
However, this technology shift has led companies to evaluate how to
best utilize their existing HPLC instruments as they continue to invest
in, and transition to, newer UPLC systems.
– Smaller particle (2.5 – 3.0 µm) columns
How to Best Use Existing HPLC Systems While
Transitioning to UPLC Technology
©2013 Waters Corporation 81
Packed in ultra-low dispersion hardware to
minimize band spreading
Designed to withstand high pressure
– 4.6 mm ID capable of 9,000 PSI
– 2.1 and 3.0 mm IDs compatible with UPLC
pressures
Flexibility in configurations
– 2.1, 3.0 and 4.6 mm ID (2.1 and 3.0mm
incorporating eCord™ technology)
– 30, 50, 75, 100 and 150 mm lengths
– 14 scalable stationary phases
Packed with XBridge [BEH] and XSelect [CSH
and HSS] 2.5 µm particles and chemistries
– BEH C18, Shield RP18, C8, Phenyl, HILIC and
Amide
– CSH C18, Phenyl-Hexyl and Fluoro-Phenyl
– HSS C18, T3, C18 SB, Cyano and PFP
eXtended Performance 2.5 µm Columns
©2013 Waters Corporation 82
AU
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
Minutes 0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00
XSelect CSH C18 XP 4.6 x 75 mm, 2.5 µm
HPLC System
2X Faster than 3.5 µm HPLC
2.5 µm XP
Improved Productivity
ACQUITY UPLC CSH C18 2.1 x 50 mm, 1.7 µm
UPLC System
9X Faster than 3.5 µm HPLC
AU
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.50 3.00 3.50 Minutes 2.10
1.7 µm
AU
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
Minutes 0.00 4.00 8.00 12.00 16.00 20.00 24.00 28.00
XSelect CSH C18 4.6 x 100 mm, 3.5 µm
HPLC System 3.5 µm
5X Faster than 2.5 µm HPLC
Tolm
eti
n
Nap
roxe
n
Fen
op
rofe
n
Ind
om
eth
acin
Dic
lofe
nac
©2013 Waters Corporation 83
Addressing the Challenges: 2.5 µm eXtended Performance Columns
Utilize XP 2.5 µm columns to improve productivity or achieve higher resolution
Addressing the challenges
Compatible with bandspread volumes of UHPLC systems
Implement XP 2.5 µm columns to decrease backpressure or increase flow rate
©2013 Waters Corporation 84
Flexible Options to Improve LC Productivity
©2013 Waters Corporation 85
Agenda
Introduction
Modern HPLC and UPLC Columns
Maximizing HPLC Performance with XP 2.5 µm Columns
NEW CORTECS UPLC 1.6 & 2.7 µm Columns
Summary
©2013 Waters Corporation 86
CORTECS Columns
UPLC Columns featuring 1.6 µm solid-core silica particles
Key benefits: – Highest efficiency UPLC Column (>35% vs fully porous sub-2-µm
columns)
– Improved performance at similar backpressure
– Increased throughput
3 Chemistries:
– C18+
– C18
– HILIC
©2013 Waters Corporation 87
The CORTECS Solid-Core Particle
Only thin outer layer contains the
pores with the chromatographic
surface
The center core is nonporous
The outer shell is typically “bumpy”
not pretty
The particle size distribution is
narrower
CORTECS
Solid-core
dcore = 1.1 µm
dp =
1.6
µm
Rho, r = 1.1/1.6 = 0.7
66% Porous Volume
ρ = 0 → fully porous particle
ρ = 1 → nonporous particle
ρ = core diameter / particle diameter
Compared to Fully Porous Particles
G. Guiochon, F. Gritti, J. Chromatogr. A 1218 (2011) 1915–1938 Omamogho et al., J. Chromatogr. A 1218 (2011) 1942-1953
©2013 Waters Corporation 88
Where We Were…
14,150
4,000
8,000
12,000
16,000
0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25
Pla
tes (
4 s
igm
a)
Flow Rate (mL/min)
Since 2004, fully porous ACQUITY UPLC 1.7 µm BEH C18
Has been our most efficient particle
Started us down the path of sub-2-µm particles and the development
of UPLC Technology, which was needed to demonstrate its efficiency
ACQUITY UPLC 1.7 µm BEH C18
2.1 x 50 mm column. A standard ACQUITY UPLC I-Class using 70% Acetonitrile in H2O at 30 °C with 0.5 µL injections from a 1 µL FL injector
©2013 Waters Corporation 89
However, as of Today…
19,700
14,150
4,000
8,000
12,000
16,000
20,000
0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25
Pla
tes (
4 s
igm
a)
Flow Rate (mL/min)
39% higher efficiency
or up to 3x faster!
CORTECS UPLC 1.6 µm C18+
ACQUITY UPLC 1.7 µm BEH C18
2.1 x 50 mm column. A standard ACQUITY UPLC I-Class using 70% Acetonitrile in H2O at 30 °C with 0.5 µL injections from a 1 µL FL injector
©2013 Waters Corporation 90
Similar Backpressure
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25
Pre
ssure
(psi)
Flow Rate (mL/min)
Specific Permeability
CORTECS UPLC C18+ 1.6 µm: k0 = 2.22E-15 m²
ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18 1.7 µm: k0 = 2.28E-15 m²
Conditions: Tested on an ACQUITY UPLC I-Class using 2.1 x 50 mm columns, 70% Acetonitrile at 30 °C
©2013 Waters Corporation 91
How do CORTECS Columns Achieve Higher Efficiency?
1.6 µm solid-core particle morphology
– The solid-core decreases diffusion within the column
– Rough particle surface yields better packed-bed uniformity
Optimized column hardware
– Low dispersion
– Pressure-tolerant for UPLC separations
Advanced packing techniques
– More than 10 years experience packing sub-2-µm particles
– Proprietary packing instrumentation
©2013 Waters Corporation 92
Overview: CORTECS 2.7 µm Columns
HPLC/UHPLC columns featuring 2.7 µm solid-core silica particles
Key benefits
– High efficiency at reduced backpressure
o Resolution
o Speed
– Scalability to/from UPLC
3 chemistries:
– C18+
– C18
– HILIC
©2013 Waters Corporation 93
Porous Particle Equivalence
CORTECS Solid-Core Particle Columns demonstrate an efficiency
equivalent to that of smaller fully porous particles and a
backpressure equivalent to that of larger fully porous particles:
CORTECS Particle Size
Equivalent Porous Particles
Efficiency Backpressure
1.6 µm 1.3 µm 1.8 µm
2.7 µm 2.2 µm 3.1 µm
©2013 Waters Corporation 94
Backpressures on 4.6 x 150 mm Columns Using Maximum Viscosity ACN Mobile Phase
Maximum performance at HPLC-optimized backpressures!
Comparative separations may not be representative in all applications.
Fully Porous C18, 2.5 µm
Competitive Solid-Core C18, 2.6 µm
CORTECS C18, 2.7 µm
Traditional HPLC Pressure
Limit
20% acetonitrile:water mixture
©2013 Waters Corporation 95
High Efficiency at HPLC Backpressures
AU
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
AU
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
AU
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
Minutes
1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50
1
2 3 4
Rs 4.9
Rs 6.3
Rs 8.2
Fully Porous C18, 5 µm
Psi: 1900 N peak 4: 10,400
Fully Porous C18, 3.5 µm
Psi: 2900 N peak 4: 17,600
CORTECS C18, 2.7 µm
Psi: 3200 N peak 4: 23,600
1. Estradiol 2. Ethinyl estradiol 3. Estrone 4. Levonorgestrel
Configuration: 4.6 x 150 mm
©2013 Waters Corporation 96
Effect of System Dispersion on Column Performance
In 2004, key component of UPLC introduction was the
relationship between observed efficiency of small particle
columns and the dispersion of the system
As system dispersion decreases, observed efficiency of columns
increases
In order to realize full potential of CORTECS Columns (all small
particle columns), low-dispersions systems should be used
©2013 Waters Corporation 97
Where Does Band Spreading / System Dispersion Occur?
Band Spreading: 1) From the Injector 2) Into, through and out
of the column 3) Into the Detector
Extra Column
Within Column
©2013 Waters Corporation 98
Band Spreading, Peak Height
and Resolution
LC systems (column and instrument) capable of producing
narrower/sharper bands create narrower/sharper peaks
This results in better resolution, taller peaks and better sensitivity
Better separation More concentrated “Bands” Higher Sensitivity
Both analytes (blue and red) are not separated [a partial co-
elution – shown as a “purple” band]
System with
MORE Band Spreading
System with
LESS Band Spreading
©2013 Waters Corporation 99
Impact of System Dispersion on Observed Efficiency of CORTECS Columns
ACQUITY UPLC I-Class
5.5 µL
ACQUITY UPLC H-Class
12 µL
Acetonitrile/ Water (70/30 v/v), 0.4 mL/ min, 30oC, 0.5 µL injection. Peak i.d.: Acetone, Naphthalene, Acenaphthene
2.1 x 50 mm CORTECS C18 Column
USP N: 18,000
USP N: 11,700
53% Increase in Observed CORTECS Column Efficiency on
ACQUITY UPLC I-Class System
©2013 Waters Corporation 100
Common UHPLC and UPLC System Bandspreads
System Band Spread (µL) 5 sigma
Shimadzu UFLC 41
Agilent 1200 28
Shimadzu Nexera (with microbore f low cell) 26
Agilent 1290 (Configured for Dual Column) 23
Thermo Accela 21
Agilent 1290 (Configured for Single Column) 20
Dionex Ultimate 3000 17
ACQUITY UPLC H-Class with Column Manager 12
ACQUITY UPLC H-Class with Column Heater 9
ACQUITY UPLC (with 1μL loop) 8
ACQUITY UPLC I-Class SM-FTN 7.5
ACQUITY UPLC I-Class SM-FL 5.5
As system bandspread decreases, observed CORTECS Column efficiency and performance increase.
Comparative separations may not be representative in all applications.
©2013 Waters Corporation 101
C18+ C18 HILIC
Chemistry
Intended Use
General purpose, high-efficiency, reversed-phase column. A positively
charged surface delivers excellent peak shape for basic compounds at low pH.
General purpose, high-efficiency, reversed-phase column. Balanced
retention of acids, bases and neutrals at low and mid-range pH.
High-efficiency column designed for retention of extremely polar analytes. Offers
orthogonal selectivity vs. C18 columns.
Ligand Type Trifunctional C18 Trifunctional C18 None
Surface Charge Modification
+ None None
Endcap Style Proprietary Proprietary None
Carbon Load 5.7% 6.6% None
Ligand Density 2.4 µmol/m2 2.7 µmol/m2 None
pH Range 2 – 8 2 – 8 1 - 5
Temperature Limits Low pH = 45 °C High pH = 45 °C
Low pH = 45 °C High pH = 45 °C
Low pH = 45 °C High pH = 45 °C
CORTECS Chemistry Overview
©2013 Waters Corporation 102
ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18 1.7 µm
CORTECS™ UPLC C18 1.6 µm
CORTECS™ UPLC C18+ 1.6 µm
Competitor B Solid-Core C18 1.7 µm
% Loss in k' for Methylparaben after Exposure to Aqueous 0.5% TFA at 60 °C for 21 hours
Competitor C Solid-Core C18 2.7 µm
Accelerated Acid Stability Data
Comparative separations may not be representative in all applications.
Shorter bar
equals longer
lifetime
under low pH conditions
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
©2013 Waters Corporation 103
Improved Peak Shape for Tricyclic Antidepressants
1. Nordoxepin (10 µg/mL) 2. Protriptyline (10 µg/mL)
3. Nortriptyline (10 µg/mL) 4. Amitriptyline (10 µg/mL)
5. Trimipramine (10 µg/mL)
AU
0.000
0.010
0.020
0.030
0.040
0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00
1
2 3
4
5
CORTECS UPLC C18+ 2.1 x 50 mm 1.6 µm
Minutes
AU
0.000
0.010
0.020
0.030
0.040
0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00
Competitor Solid-Core C18 2.1 x 50 mm 1.7 µm
1
2 3
4 5
Significant
improvement in peak shape and
peak capacity for
basic compounds!
ACQUITY UPLC H-Class with ACQUITY PDA Mobile Phase A: 0.1% Formic Acid in Water Mobile Phase B: 0.1% Formic Acid in ACN Gradient: 28% B to 35% B in 3 min Flow Rate: 0.6 mL/min Column Temp: 30° C UV Detection: 254 nm Injection Volume: 1.0 µL
Comparative separations may not be representative in all applications.
Pc= 47
Pc= 123
©2013 Waters Corporation 104
Loading Capacity Comparison
Imip
ram
ine Amitriptyline
Imip
ram
ine
Amitriptyline
Imip
ram
ine
Amitriptyline ACQUITY UPLC CSH C18 2.1 x 50 mm 1.7 µm
CORTECS C18+ 2.1 x 50 mm 1.6 µm
Competitive Solid-Core C18
2.1 x 50mm 1.7 µm
System: ACQUITY UPLC I-Class with ACQUITY PDA Mobile Phase A: 0.1% Formic Acid in Water Mobile Phase B: 0.1% Formic Acid in Acetonitrile Gradient: See Table Flow Rate: 0.6 mL/min Column Temperature: 30° C Detection: 254nm Injection Volume: 5.0 µL
Highest Loading
Capacity on ACQUITY UPLC
CSH C18
Comparative separations may not be representative in all applications.
©2013 Waters Corporation 105
Time0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.20 2.40 2.60 2.80 3.00 3.20 3.40
%
0
Time0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.20 2.40 2.60 2.80 3.00 3.20 3.40
%
0
9
3
2
1
4
5
6
7
8
10
3
2
1
4
5
6
7
8
10
9
1) AM 2223 2) RCS-4, M10 3) RCS-4, M11 4) AM 1248 5) JWH-073 4-butanoic acid
metabolite 6) JWH-073 4-hydroxybutyl
metabolite 7) JWH-018 5-pentanoic acid
metabolite 8) JWH-073 (+/-) 3-
hydroxybutyl metabolite 9) JWH-018 5-hydroxypentyl
metabolite 10) JWH-018 (+/-) 4-
hydroxypentyl metabolite
CORTECS UPLC C18 2.1 x 100 mm 1.6 µm
ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18 2.1 x 100 mm 1.7 µm
Resolution of peaks 5/6, 7/8 and 9/10 (isobaric) allows accurate quantitation on
CORTECS C18 vs ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18
Excellent Retention and Resolution of Synthetic Cannabinoids on CORTECS C18
Minutes
ACQUITY UPLC with Xevo TQD MS
©2013 Waters Corporation 106
ACh
HA
t-MIAA
t-MHA
iso-ACh Ch
Analysis of Neurotransmitters in Artificial CSF Using CORTECS HILIC
HA: Histamine t-MHA: tele-methylhistamine
t-MIAA: tele-methylimidazoleacetic acid ACh: Acetylcholine
Ch: Choline iso-ACh: iso-Acetylcholine
CORTECS UPLC HILIC 2.1 x 100 mm 1.6 µm ACQUITY UPLC with Xevo TQ-S MS
Minutes
These neurotransmitters are highly polar and poorly retained in RP-LC
Iso-ACh, an isobaric endogenous interference of ACh in CSF, is
chromatographically resolved using the CORTECS column.
©2013 Waters Corporation 107
Practical Benefits of Increased Efficiency Better Resolution
AU
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
AU
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
Minutes 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00
1
2
3
4
5
ACQUITY BEH HILIC 2.1 x 50mm 1.7 µm
CORTECS UPLC HILIC 2.1 x 50 mm 1.6 µm
1
2
3
4
5
1. Lidocaine
2. Butacaine
3. Tetracaine
4. Procaine
5. Procainamide
USP Resolution2,3: 1.2
USP Resolution2,3: 2.2
©2013 Waters Corporation 108
Practical Benefits of Increased Efficiency Higher Throughput – Double Flow Rate
Comparable peak capacities (Pc) in
half the time
Note: the gradient is scaled to account for the change in f low rate
Comparative separations may not be representative in all applications.
AU
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
0.12
0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.20 2.40 2.60 2.80 3.00
Competitor Fully-porous C18 at 0.5 mL/min 2.1 x 50 mm 1.8 µm Gradient time: 4.2 min Runtime: 6 min
1
2 3
4
5
6
7
1. Sulfathiazole 2. Sulfamerazine
3. Sulfamethazine 4. Sulfamethoxypyridazine
5. Sulfachloropyridazine 6. Sulfamethoxazole 7. Sulfasoxazole
CORTECS UPLC C18+ at 1.0 mL/min 2.1 x 50 mm 1.6 µm Gradient time: 2.1 min Runtime: 3 min
Pc= 131 31 peaks per minute (gradient)
Pc= 136 65 peaks per minute (gradient)
©2013 Waters Corporation 109
Practical Benefits of Increased Efficiency Higher Throughput – Shorter Column
Comparable peak capacities (Pc) in
half the time
Note: the gradient is scaled to account for the change in column length
Comparative separations may not be representative in all applications.
2.1 x 100 mm 1.7 µm Competitor Solid-Core C18
Gradient time: 8.4 min Runtime: 12 min
2.1 x 50 mm 1.6 µm CORTECS UPLC C18+ Gradient time: 4.2min Runtime: 6 min
Pc= 175 21 peaks per minute (gradient)
Pc= 167 40 peaks per minute (gradient)
©2013 Waters Corporation 110
Widest Selection of UPLC Particle Offering
CORTECS
Solid-Core
Technology
Higher efficiency and
resolution
Increased throughput
at similar resolution
Higher performance
at same backpressure
BEH Technology
Unparalleled pH stability
Mobile phase and
temperature versatility
Seamless scalability
to HPLC
HSS Technology
Maximum retention
Particle and ligand
selectivity
Seamless scalability
to HPLC
CSH Technology
Exceptional loading capacity
Superior peak shape
for basic analytes
Seamless scalability
to HPLC
Waters is the ONLY company that has
fully porous and solid-core sub-2-µm particle columns
©2013 Waters Corporation 111
Agenda
Introduction
Modern HPLC and UPLC Columns
Maximizing HPLC Performance with XP 2.5 µm Columns
NEW CORTECS UPLC 1.6 & 2.7 µm Columns
Summary
©2013 Waters Corporation 112
Summary
Waters is committed to manufacturing high-quality
consumables that ensure reproducible results year after year
System benchmarking with QCRMs ensures confidence in
your analytical results
XBridge BEH Columns designed for pH stability and method
flexibility
XSelect HSS and CSH Columns provide maximum retention,
selectivity and excellent peak shape for basic analytes
2.5 µm XP columns bridge the gap between HPLC and UPLC
– Compatible with HPLC, UHPLC and UPLC system platforms
– Maximize HPLC productivity
CORTECS UPLC Columns enable highest efficiency,
resolution and throughput
©2013 Waters Corporation 113
Thank you for your attention
Questions?
©2013 Waters Corporation 114