Upload
ledang
View
219
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
goals
2
1.Develop a high level understanding of UX and how its applied to startups2.Be able to describe your startup company or idea using the CPS hypothesis
3.Identify key UX-metrics and research methods for gathering those metrics4.Hop on the UX bandwagon!
What is UX?
4
-User Experience Research and Design brings human perspective to the development of a technology by describing it in terms of users, goals, tasks, and behaviors.
-Helps companies understand and develop their technology from the users perspective…you are not your user!
-Can make or break your company.
-Relies heavily on knowledge and methods from psychology, anthropology, sociology, design, research, and computer science
-Lies at the crossroads of art and science and requires both analytical thinking and creativity.
CPS Hypothesis
5
Problem (and current solutions)
Customer (user)
Solution
By writing out simple definitions of your customer, problem ,and solution, you are creating a hypothesis which can be validated or rejected through UX research methods
The CPS is a basic, minimalist description of any product that defines who your customer is, the problem they have, the current solution to that
problem, and the solution you offer.
mova loves Gustav
6
Problem (and current solutions)
Customer (user)
Solution
Customer (user)
Art consumers seeking to purchase art based on personal preference
Problem
Art consumers need guidance for the selection of art they want to purchase, art sellers need to
match their art to potential buyers.
SolutionProvide art curations that match a buyer’s
preferences based on that person’s personality profile
UX research methods
Understand the opportunity
Understand the user
understand the problem
Ideate possible solutions
test solutions
• Opportunity assessment
• Business model canvas
• Competitive analysis
improve on solutions
UX debt analysis
• Personas • Empathy maps • Customer
Journey maps • Ethnography • Contextual
research • Diary studies • Focus groups • Expert Interview
• Problem Hypothesis
• Root cause analysis
• SWOT analysis • Value proposition
canvas • stakeholder
interviews • Ethnography
• Scope technical requirements
• Storyboard • Card sorting • MVP/prototype
ProblemCustomer Solution
• A/B testing • Concept testing • Usability testing • Eye-tracking • Cognitive task
analysis • Mental work load
• Iterative testing • Functional debt • Technical debt • Behavior debt
usability metrics
17Site visits: Total site visitors
Common UX metrics
Effectiveness The accuracy and completeness with which
users achieve specified goals
Efficiency The resources expended in relation to the
accuracy and completeness with which users achieve goals.
Satisfaction The comfort and acceptability of use
Frustration The frequency and type of errors users make
improve on solutions
system usability scale
I think that I would like to use this system frequently. 1
I found the system unnecessarily complex. 2
I thought the system was easy to use. 3
I would need the support of a technical person to be able to use this system. 4
I found the various functions in this system were well integrated. 5
I thought there was too much inconsistency in this system. 6
I would imagine that most people would learn to use this system very quickly. 7
I found the system very cumbersome to use. 8
I felt very confident using the system. 9
I needed to learn a lot of things before I could get going with this system. 10
18
1 5
strongly agree strongly disagree 2 3 4
the following questions are administered to end-users following a task-based usability session
The System Usability Scale (SUS) is a tool for measuring the user perception of usability a wide variety of products and services, including physical devices, hardware, software, mobile devices, websites, and digital applications.
improve on solutions
system usability scale
19
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
score
perc
enti
le r
ank
user 1: 80
user 2: 86
user 3: 73
user 4: 93
user 5: 88
user 6: 78 Average SUS Score: 83 a
• sus calculator: http://willhacker.net/2010/10/17/sus-calculator/
improve on solutions
comparing designs
20
design a design b design c
This design is awesome!
Good, not great. Meh…
a c d 82 68 55
www.companyname.comSectionName
validating design iterations
21
mvp
version 1
version 2
version3
sus score: 58
sus score: 68
sus score: 76
sus score: 88
competitive analysis
22
startup “xyz”
88.2 90.972
startup “xyz” is creating a website for distributing audiobooks. heres how they stack up against the competition