36
1 Introduction to Trenchless Technology Continuous Trenching

Introduction to Trenchless · PDF filePulse Induction Ground Penetrating ... Trenchless Technology vs. Open cut excavation Social Costs Economic: Traffic disruption

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Introduction to Trenchless  · PDF filePulse Induction Ground Penetrating ... Trenchless Technology vs. Open cut excavation Social Costs Economic: Traffic disruption

1

Introduction toTrenchless Technology

Continuous Trenching

Page 2: Introduction to Trenchless  · PDF filePulse Induction Ground Penetrating ... Trenchless Technology vs. Open cut excavation Social Costs Economic: Traffic disruption

2

Old roads, old pipes ?

• Superb construction• Little maintenance • Low operational costs

• When to rehabilitate?

JACK

New roads, old pipes?

Page 3: Introduction to Trenchless  · PDF filePulse Induction Ground Penetrating ... Trenchless Technology vs. Open cut excavation Social Costs Economic: Traffic disruption

3

We are not alone!

Jack appears in different figures!

………but mostly not at the same time!

Jack’s appearance

Needs to be • Minimized or banished

• Find other ways of rehabilitation• Less damage to pavement• Less inconvenience to customers

Page 4: Introduction to Trenchless  · PDF filePulse Induction Ground Penetrating ... Trenchless Technology vs. Open cut excavation Social Costs Economic: Traffic disruption

4

Solution to JACK

Trenchless Technologies

Trenchless Technology

Techniques for utility line installation, replacement, rehabilitation, inspection, location and leak

detection,with minimum excavation from the ground surface.

North American Society of Trenchless Technology (NASTT)

Page 5: Introduction to Trenchless  · PDF filePulse Induction Ground Penetrating ... Trenchless Technology vs. Open cut excavation Social Costs Economic: Traffic disruption

5

Key PointsMinimal surface excavation

Alternative to open cut excavation

Can have entrance and exit surface excavations – JACK!!!!

Pipelines usually have diameters less than 900 mm (36 inches) - non person entry

Key Points (Continued)Typically considers only urban utilities:

Water and wastewater systemsGas, petroleum and chemical pipelines Electrical and communications networksAccess ways and other small diameter tunnels

Page 6: Introduction to Trenchless  · PDF filePulse Induction Ground Penetrating ... Trenchless Technology vs. Open cut excavation Social Costs Economic: Traffic disruption

6

Excludes: Large tunnels (< 1%)

Chunnel

World largest tunneling machine(14.2 m in diameter)

people

Method ClassificationMany classification systems proposedNo industry standardGenerally TT methods classified into four broad categories

Page 7: Introduction to Trenchless  · PDF filePulse Induction Ground Penetrating ... Trenchless Technology vs. Open cut excavation Social Costs Economic: Traffic disruption

7

Broad Categories

TrenchlessTechnologies

ConditionAssessment

On-lineReplacement

RehabilitationRepair

NewInstallations

LocatingMapping

AssetManagement

New Installations

Page 8: Introduction to Trenchless  · PDF filePulse Induction Ground Penetrating ... Trenchless Technology vs. Open cut excavation Social Costs Economic: Traffic disruption

8

New Installations

NewInstallations

Non-SteeringMethods

SteeringMethods

MolingPipe RammingAuger Boring

MicrotunnellingHorizontal Directional Drilling

Pipe Jacking

On-line Method

Page 9: Introduction to Trenchless  · PDF filePulse Induction Ground Penetrating ... Trenchless Technology vs. Open cut excavation Social Costs Economic: Traffic disruption

9

On-line MethodPipe bursting

Gravity Pipesvitrified clay, brick, concrete, steel, ductile & cast iron, asbestos cement (transite), pitch fibreHDPE,PVC etc..

Page 10: Introduction to Trenchless  · PDF filePulse Induction Ground Penetrating ... Trenchless Technology vs. Open cut excavation Social Costs Economic: Traffic disruption

10

Pressure PipesPrestressed Concrete Cylinder Pipes (PCCP)

AWWA C301 and C303, lined, embedded core, bar wrapped

SteelIron (cast and ductile)Asbestos cement (transite)Wood (solid and stave)HDPEPVCetc..

Pipe MaterialsNon-metallic

Wood stave pipePolyethylene

MDPEHDPE

PVCConcretePolymer concreteAsbestos cementPitch fibre

MetallicCast ironDuctile ironCopperSteelPCCP

Page 11: Introduction to Trenchless  · PDF filePulse Induction Ground Penetrating ... Trenchless Technology vs. Open cut excavation Social Costs Economic: Traffic disruption

11

Pipeline AccessGRAVITY Pipelines

Partial pipe flow Interior access readily available by person, camera, and non destructive testing (NDT) toolsPipeline inspection performed live or off line

Pressure PipelinesFull pipe flowTypically small diameter than gravity pipelinesInterior access limited (pressure, contamination and disinfection)Interior inspection usually requires pipe Sto be taken off line

Pipeline Condition AssessmentPipe condition rating

Deterioration state?Video camera imaging (CCTV)Acoustic methodsMagnetic methods

Page 12: Introduction to Trenchless  · PDF filePulse Induction Ground Penetrating ... Trenchless Technology vs. Open cut excavation Social Costs Economic: Traffic disruption

12

SaharaSahara®®: System: SystemReal Time Data ProcessingReal Time Data Processing

Exact LocationsExact Locations

Corroded Wires & CylinderCorroded Wires & Cylinder

Unknown Leak!

Page 13: Introduction to Trenchless  · PDF filePulse Induction Ground Penetrating ... Trenchless Technology vs. Open cut excavation Social Costs Economic: Traffic disruption

13

Common Pipe DeteriorationMetallic pipe

Corrosion (reduced pipe wall thickness)

Micro cracks in welds

Leaking joints

Non-metallic pipeCracks FracturesDeformationCollapse

TRENCHLESS PIPELINE REPAIR

Page 14: Introduction to Trenchless  · PDF filePulse Induction Ground Penetrating ... Trenchless Technology vs. Open cut excavation Social Costs Economic: Traffic disruption

14

Trenchless Pipeline Repair

GOALReturn a defective pipeline to

a serviceable condition without replacement

How you reach that goal is the key!

Lining - Technologies

Cured-in-Place Pipe (CIPP)

Main Line

Close-Fit Lining

Slip Lining Spray on

Proprietary Technologies

Page 15: Introduction to Trenchless  · PDF filePulse Induction Ground Penetrating ... Trenchless Technology vs. Open cut excavation Social Costs Economic: Traffic disruption

15

CIPP

Before

After

Close Fit Lining

Page 16: Introduction to Trenchless  · PDF filePulse Induction Ground Penetrating ... Trenchless Technology vs. Open cut excavation Social Costs Economic: Traffic disruption

16

Slip Lining

Rehabilitation

Cement mortarEpoxy

Spray on linings

Page 17: Introduction to Trenchless  · PDF filePulse Induction Ground Penetrating ... Trenchless Technology vs. Open cut excavation Social Costs Economic: Traffic disruption

17

Water and Sewer By-Pass

Trenchless Technologies

Tools in a Tool box

Page 18: Introduction to Trenchless  · PDF filePulse Induction Ground Penetrating ... Trenchless Technology vs. Open cut excavation Social Costs Economic: Traffic disruption

18

GrowingTrenchlessIndustry Water

Sewer2005

2004

2005

2004

Water

Sewer

REHAB

NEW

Municipal Survey Results

4.28/5.0

Page 19: Introduction to Trenchless  · PDF filePulse Induction Ground Penetrating ... Trenchless Technology vs. Open cut excavation Social Costs Economic: Traffic disruption

19

Where are those utilities?

Page 20: Introduction to Trenchless  · PDF filePulse Induction Ground Penetrating ... Trenchless Technology vs. Open cut excavation Social Costs Economic: Traffic disruption

20

Gas Main in a Sewer Lateral

Page 21: Introduction to Trenchless  · PDF filePulse Induction Ground Penetrating ... Trenchless Technology vs. Open cut excavation Social Costs Economic: Traffic disruption

21

Clearing a Lateral Blockage?

Utility Location and Mapping

Page 22: Introduction to Trenchless  · PDF filePulse Induction Ground Penetrating ... Trenchless Technology vs. Open cut excavation Social Costs Economic: Traffic disruption

22

Pipe line location“As built” or “As Recorded” drawings

Not accurateOften do not know where it is

(plan or depth)Cost of not knowing:

Line hitsIncreased construction costs

Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE)

Pipe line locationCost of not knowing:

Line hitsIncreased construction costs

Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE)

Page 23: Introduction to Trenchless  · PDF filePulse Induction Ground Penetrating ... Trenchless Technology vs. Open cut excavation Social Costs Economic: Traffic disruption

23

Cost of Not Knowing

Basic Tenets of SUESUE Quality Levels

Page 24: Introduction to Trenchless  · PDF filePulse Induction Ground Penetrating ... Trenchless Technology vs. Open cut excavation Social Costs Economic: Traffic disruption

24

ASCE Standard GuidelineASCE Standard Guideline

Quality Level “D”

Utility Contact PhaseRecords Research

Page 25: Introduction to Trenchless  · PDF filePulse Induction Ground Penetrating ... Trenchless Technology vs. Open cut excavation Social Costs Economic: Traffic disruption

25

Quality Level “C”(Visible Features)

Quality Level “B”

Determine Horizontal Alignment

Page 26: Introduction to Trenchless  · PDF filePulse Induction Ground Penetrating ... Trenchless Technology vs. Open cut excavation Social Costs Economic: Traffic disruption

26

Typical QL-B Designating ProjectElectromagneticMagnetometerResonant SonicsAcousticalPulse InductionGround Penetrating Radar

Typical GPR Survey0 -

10 -

20 -

30 -

Tim

e (n

s)

0 10 20Position (m)

Utility

Soil fill horizon

Page 27: Introduction to Trenchless  · PDF filePulse Induction Ground Penetrating ... Trenchless Technology vs. Open cut excavation Social Costs Economic: Traffic disruption

27

Quality Level “A”Utility ExposedAccurate X,Y, Z LocatingSize, Material and Condition

Utility Locating

Survey/Data ManagementConventionalGPSSUMGIS

Page 28: Introduction to Trenchless  · PDF filePulse Induction Ground Penetrating ... Trenchless Technology vs. Open cut excavation Social Costs Economic: Traffic disruption

28

Mobile GIS?

Utility Locating Quality Level “A”Non-Destructive ExcavationAir/Water & Vacuum Units

Page 29: Introduction to Trenchless  · PDF filePulse Induction Ground Penetrating ... Trenchless Technology vs. Open cut excavation Social Costs Economic: Traffic disruption

29

Existing Water and SUE Data

Existing Water and SUE Data

Page 30: Introduction to Trenchless  · PDF filePulse Induction Ground Penetrating ... Trenchless Technology vs. Open cut excavation Social Costs Economic: Traffic disruption

30

Existing Water and SUE Data

What is Cost of Not Knowing?Studies show that there is a payback of at

least $4.00 for every $1 spent on SUE.Reduced construction delaysImproved asset operation maintenance and planningEffective spending of rehabilitation $$:

One Ontario relined cement mortar pipe beside it was labeled on GIS system as unlined DI.Liner wrinkled and had to be removed

Page 31: Introduction to Trenchless  · PDF filePulse Induction Ground Penetrating ... Trenchless Technology vs. Open cut excavation Social Costs Economic: Traffic disruption

31

Trenchless Technologyvs.

Open cut excavation

Social CostsEconomic:

Traffic disruptionPedestrian disruptionCommercial and business disruption

Environmental:Noise and vibration

Page 32: Introduction to Trenchless  · PDF filePulse Induction Ground Penetrating ... Trenchless Technology vs. Open cut excavation Social Costs Economic: Traffic disruption

32

Social Costs (con’t)Safety

Worker safetyEmergency service access

Indirect costsLoss of residual life of adjacent utilities and pavement structures

Social Costs

Not traditionally included in construction costsSometimes difficult to quantify or specifyBecoming more relevant for rehabilitation and construction in urban areas

Page 33: Introduction to Trenchless  · PDF filePulse Induction Ground Penetrating ... Trenchless Technology vs. Open cut excavation Social Costs Economic: Traffic disruption

33

Social Costs

Social Costs

Page 34: Introduction to Trenchless  · PDF filePulse Induction Ground Penetrating ... Trenchless Technology vs. Open cut excavation Social Costs Economic: Traffic disruption

34

Environmental Costs

Typical Urban Project Costs

Restoration

75%

Materials 5%

Construction

20%

Page 35: Introduction to Trenchless  · PDF filePulse Induction Ground Penetrating ... Trenchless Technology vs. Open cut excavation Social Costs Economic: Traffic disruption

35

Typical Urban ProjectSocial costs savings

Traffic delays (cars & people)Economic loses (business)

EnvironmentalNoiseGreenhouse gases

Public perception

Advantages of TT

New installationsFaster pipe installationEnvironmentally friendly???Lower social costsLess labour intensiveLower green house gas emissions?Deeper services

RehabilitationLimited excavationFastLow social costsLine remains in serviceLower construction cost???

Page 36: Introduction to Trenchless  · PDF filePulse Induction Ground Penetrating ... Trenchless Technology vs. Open cut excavation Social Costs Economic: Traffic disruption

36

TT LimitationsNew construction

Limited contract specifications availableInstallation impact on pipe or other buried structures??Contractor experience

Who takes the risk?

RehabilitationQuality assurance

Materials, construction

Industry marketingInstallation cost?Inspection techniquesDesign techniquesFailures - cost of not knowing