10
Introduction to the X-band resource estimation exercise W. Wuensch Collaboration meeting 3 November 2011

Introduction to the X-band resource estimation exercise W. Wuensch Collaboration meeting 3 November 2011

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Introduction to the X-band resource estimation exercise W. Wuensch Collaboration meeting 3 November 2011

Introduction to the X-band resource estimation exercise

W. WuenschCollaboration meeting

3 November 2011

Page 2: Introduction to the X-band resource estimation exercise W. Wuensch Collaboration meeting 3 November 2011

Very brief, personal, view of the current status of the technical program and a look to the next years

PETS - Easily making specifications. We need to test more often and in more realistic conditions.

Accelerating structures – Probably close enough to specifications to go forward on a baseline, which means adding all details, statistics and lifetime. Big question is what happens with beam loading. We are still learning a LOT about life at 100 MV/m and have many refinements, optimizations and alternatives to work through.

rf components – Diverse zoo of components, healthy and growing.

High-power test capability – Still struggling. KEK recovered from the earthquake and has a steady, even expanding, program planned. SLAC winding down for us. CERN very promising now but still not there. CTF3 restricted to specialized system tests not high rep rate component tests. Breakthrough with new ideas on using medium power sources?

High-gradient studies – Major elements of multi-scale picture of breakdown can now be simulated. Starting to produce direct predictions of dependencies, scaling laws and surface preparation techniques. Uncovering the effect of surface current on gradient. Specialized experimental set-ups getting closer to rf conditions.

Page 3: Introduction to the X-band resource estimation exercise W. Wuensch Collaboration meeting 3 November 2011

Our primary objective over the next five years

Validate with enough statistics, fully-featured, ‘project-ready’, cost and performance optimized X-band system components for the CLIC main linacs.

Plus a secondary objective

Nurture an ecosystem of X-band and high-gradient collaborators, applications and suppliers.

Page 4: Introduction to the X-band resource estimation exercise W. Wuensch Collaboration meeting 3 November 2011

This has lead to defining the following five work packages to help coordinate the work and resources among many groups and laboratories

We think the following program will fulfill our objective and will require the indicated resources.

This needs to brought in line with the reality of the resources we will actually get, perhaps re-prioritizing, refined and made more precise.

HELP!

Name WP HolderX-band Technologies RF-DESIGN X-band Rf structure Design A.Grudjev, I. Syratchev

Walter Wuensch RF-XPROD X-band Rf structure Production G.Riddone RF-XTESTING X-band Rf structure High Power Testing S.Doebert RF-XTESTFAC Creation and Operation of x-band High power Testing Facilities E.Jensen (placeholder) RF-R&D Basic High Gradient R&D S.Calatroni

Page 5: Introduction to the X-band resource estimation exercise W. Wuensch Collaboration meeting 3 November 2011

WP: RF-DESIGN Workpackage leaders: A.Grudiev, I. Syratchev

Purpose/Objectives/GoalsDeliverables (incl. approx. resource estimate)

Schedule

Task 1: Design of accelerating x-band structures

Contribution and follow-up to parameter evolution of CLIC project; optimization of designs for higher gradient and low breakdown rate as well as for lower cost and higher RF-to-beam efficiency:BDR investigation, pulsed surface heating investigation, couplers, wakefield measurements, wakefield suppression, special rf tests etc.

Better designs, new designs for new construction scenarioor energy staging

2012-2016

Task 2: Design of PETS Refinement of designs, optimized ON/OFF 2012-2016

Task 3: Design of auxiliary components WFM, Rf networks, breakdown monitors   2012-2016

Task 4: Test definition and analysis

Contribution to definition of high power test program, contribution to data analysis, integration of test results  

Additional information or comments: could be link to more informationLink to other WPs/activities: This WP is linked to WPs BPH-BASE, BPH-SIM, BPH-ML, CTF3-003, BTS-001, CTC-004 and RF-XXXsKey partners: already engaged or potential as known Estimated resources (needed): 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Material (kCHF) 200 250 300 300 300 1350Personnel (FTE) 5 6 6 6 6 29Resource comment:

Page 6: Introduction to the X-band resource estimation exercise W. Wuensch Collaboration meeting 3 November 2011

WP: Production- Workpackage leader: G.Riddone

Purpose/Objectives/Goals Deliverables (incl. approx. resource estimate) Schedule

Task 1: Construction of baseline accelerating structures

Test structures for statistical and long term high-power testing with all damping features and high power couplers (for SATS and Test modules in CLEX) è we have to make sure that we count all the structures. including those for the CLEX modules

3 generations of test structures, total quantity 48, total cost ~6 MCHF.

12 in 2013, 12 in 2014, 12 in 2015, 12 in 2016

Task 2: Supply of small series development prototypes and/or medium power test structures

Test structures for full features (4), wakefield monitor equipped (4), optimized high-power design (8), different machine energy optima (4), optimized process (8), develop DDS (2) and choke (2), compressor (2)

Typically 12 variants in series of 4 structures each, total quantity 40, total cost ~6 MCHF.

8 structures per year

Task 3: Supply baseline PETS (note: most PETS fabrication accounted elsewhere, e.g. TBL)

PETS for statistical and long term high-power testing 4 PETS, total cost 0.2 MCHF.2 in 2013, 1 in 2014, 1 in 2015

Task 4: PETS for ON/OFF testing PETS for on/ off test 2 generations 0.1 MCHF  

Task 5: Alternative fabrication method Explore alternative fabrication methods Structure fabricated with alternative

procedure 2012-2016

Task 6: Baseline to pre-series development

Take the fully tested x band rf Systems and evolve their production techniques to an industrialized process   2015

onwards Additional information or comments: could be link to more informationLink to other WPs/activities: This WP is integrated to WPs CTF3-002, CTF3-003 and CTF3-004Key partners: already engaged (CEA-IRFU, HIP, Dubna-JINR, Greece, Spain) or potential (Greece, Pakistan) Estimated resources (needed): 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total

Material (kCHF) 3000 3000 3100 3300 3400 15800Personnel (FTE) 9 9 11 12 12 53

Resource comment:            

Page 7: Introduction to the X-band resource estimation exercise W. Wuensch Collaboration meeting 3 November 2011

WP: Test areas Workpackage leaders: Erk Jensen Purpose/Objectives/Goals Deliverables (incl. approx.

resource estimate) Schedule

Task 1: High-power test stands      

Task 2: Medium power, high rep rate test stand      

Task 3: Test stand operation      

Task 4:      

Additional information or comments: could be link to more informationLink to other WPs/activities: This WP is linked to WPsKey partners: already engaged or potential as known Estimated resources (needed): 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Material (kCHF)            Personnel (FTE)            Resource comment:

Page 8: Introduction to the X-band resource estimation exercise W. Wuensch Collaboration meeting 3 November 2011

WP: Testing Workpackage leader: Steffen Doebert

Purpose/Objectives/GoalsDeliverables (incl. approx. resource estimate)

Schedule

Task 1: High power testing of x-band structures at CERN

Test x-band structures at 12 GHz at CERN, access structure performance as a function of processing and fabrication parameters

completed structutre tests and data analysis (1 FTE per teststand )

2012-2016

Task 2: High power testing of x-band structures elsewhere (KEK/SLAC)

Follow up structures testing elsewhere, provide resources, coordinate colaboration agreements,give technical input for testing and data analysis

completed structure tests and data analysis (1 FTE at SLAC, 1 FTE at KEK)

2012-2016

Task 3: Maintain overall testing schedule inline with R&D goals and priorities

transparent structure testing planning updated testing schedule (0.2 FTE) 2012-2016

Task 4: Maintain and coordinate globla data analysis and document results

overview of the results to document achievements and draw conclusions

data analysis, publications, 'database', (0.3 FTE) 2012-2016

Task 5: Feedback to structure design and test stands

Optimise the structure design and test stands 2012-2016

Additional information or comments: Link to other WPs/activities: This WP should have a close link to RF-testfac to coordiante the needsKey partners: KEK, SLAC, CEA Estimated resources (needed): 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total

Material (kCHF) 200 250 250 250 250 1200Personnel (FTE) at CERN 3 5 7 9 9 33Resource comment:FTE elsewhere 2 2 2 2 2 10

Page 9: Introduction to the X-band resource estimation exercise W. Wuensch Collaboration meeting 3 November 2011

WP: High-gradient Workpackage leaders: S. Calatroni, W. Wuensch

Purpose/Objectives/GoalsDeliverables (incl. approx. resource estimate)

Schedule

Task 1: dc spark test areas

1 kHz range repetition rate, large area testing, fully instrumented dc spark systems

2 systems for a total cost of 0.5 MCHF

First system operational 2012, second system operational 2014

Task 2: Theoretical and experimental studies of high-gradient and high-power phenomena

Basic understanding of high-gradient and high-power phenomena including breakdown, pulsed surface heating, high-power rf design dynamic vacuum and dark current.

Data analysis of existing experiments, new experiments proposal, computations, reports

 

Task 3: Application of high-gradient and high-frequency technology to other projects

Create technology base for compact normal conducting accelerators. Reports on high-gradient X-band

applications  

        Additional information or comments: could be link to more informationLink to other WPs/activities: This WP is linked to WPs RF-xprod, RF-xtestingKey partners: already engaged or potential as known: SLAC, KEK, Helsinki Univ., Upssala Univ., IAP Sumy (Ukraine), Wueppertal U. Estimated resources (needed): 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total

Material (kCHF) 200 200 200 200 200 1000Personnel (FTE) 1 1 1 1 1  Resource comment:

Page 10: Introduction to the X-band resource estimation exercise W. Wuensch Collaboration meeting 3 November 2011

Some comments on today:

I’m truly sorry about the packed schedule – it’s brutal but let’s try to stick to it.

This afternoon I would like to synthesize all of the templates into a single excel sheet and would like to ask for volunteers to help with this. I think I can see how we can work in parallel…