Upload
buzz
View
47
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Introduction to RTI and the OrRTI Project. David Putnam, Jr., Ph.D. OrRTI Spring Conference Bend, Oregon May 21, 2014. Harmonic Convergence and Golden Opportunity. RTI/MTSS. But we are Failing Far Too Many Students. NAEP OAKS DIBELS, EasyCBM , AIMSweb - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day.
Oregon Response to Intervention
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day.
Introduction to RTI and the OrRTI Project
David Putnam, Jr., Ph.D.OrRTI Spring Conference
Bend, OregonMay 21, 2014
Oregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.orgOregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.org
Harmonic Convergence and Golden Opportunity
EBP
DBDM
Law, Policy, Economics
Neuroscience
Implementation Science
Skilled EducatorsRTI/
MTSS
Oregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.orgOregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.org
But we are Failing Far Too Many Students
• NAEP• OAKS• DIBELS, EasyCBM, AIMSweb• College & Career Readiness• CCSS
Oregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.orgOregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.org
BIG IDEAS
• Overview of RTI and OrRTI • Essential features • Myths and facts• Benefits and outcomes• Implementation
considerations
Oregon RTI Project Growth
Tigard-TualatinPendleton
Ontario
Sheridan
Roseburg
Cadre 1: 2005-2006
# of Districts: 4 0% 20% 40% 60% 80%100%
4.7%% of Oregon
Student Population
Canby
Hood River
BethelCrow-Applegate-Lorane
Lowell
North Clackamas Ion
e
Pilot Rock
Nyssa
Cadre 2: 2006-2007
# of Districts: 13 0% 20% 40% 60% 80%100%
10.8%% of Oregon
Student Population
Baker
Astoria
Nestucca Valley Sci
o
Grants Pass
Sherwood
Cadre 3: 2007-2008
# of Districts: 18 0% 20% 40% 60% 80%100%
13.8%% of Oregon
Student Population
Fern Ridge
Hermiston
Central Curry
Seaside
Cadre 4: 2008-2009
# of Districts: 22 0% 20% 40% 60% 80%100%
15.5%% of Oregon
Student Population
Bend-LaPine
Cascade
Crook County
Springfield
North Bend
Knappa
Cadre 5: 2009-2010
# of Districts: 28 0% 20% 40% 60% 80%100%
21.5%% of Oregon
Student Population
Lebanon Siste
rsSweet Home
Estacada
Bandon Glenda
leCentral Point
Cadre 6: 2010-2011
Parkrose* Gresham-
Barlow*
# of Districts: 37 0% 20% 40% 60% 80%100%
27.6%% of Oregon
Student Population
Cadre 7: 2011-2012
Junction City
David Douglas
Klamath County Lake
County
Paisley
North Lake
St. Helens
Yoncalla
Cadre 7: 2011-2012
# of Districts: 45 0% 20% 40% 60% 80%100%
31.9%% of Oregon
Student Population
Cadre 8: 2012-2013
Mitchell
Forest Grove
John Day
Reedsport
Butte Falls
Morrow
North PowderNorth
Marion
Cadre 8: 2012-2013
McKenzie*
# of Districts: 55
Clatskanie*
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%100%
34.1%% of Oregon
Student Population
Cadre 9: 2013-2014 Raine
r
Sutherlin
Mapleton
Coquille
Port Orford
Brookings-Harbour
Harney County
Gladstone
# of Districts: 63 0% 20% 40% 60% 80%100%
35.6%% of Oregon
Student Population**Projected
Cadre 9.2: 2013-2014
# of Districts: 73 0% 20% 40% 60% 80%100%
38.9%% of Oregon
Student Population**Projected
Clatskanie
Adel
Creswell
Jewell
Klamath Falls City
Milton-Freewater
Plush
Eagle Point
Three Rivers
North Wasco
TTSD
Roseburg
BEND Ontario
Oregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.orgOregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.org
Essential Features
Data-Based
Decision Making
with Decision
Rules
Training CoachingFidelity
Standards of
Practice
CultureLeadership
Teaming/Data-Based Decision
Making
Professional Learning &
Support
RTI Essential Components
CoreScreening
InterventionsProgress MonitoringSLD Decision Making
Data-Based
Decision Making
with Decision
Rules
Training CoachingFidelity
Standards of
Practice
CultureLeadership
Teaming/Data-Based Decision
Making
Professional Learning &
Support
RTI Essential Components
CoreScreening
InterventionsProgress MonitoringSLD Decision Making
Data-Based
Decision Making
with Decision
Rules
Training CoachingFidelity
Standards of
Practice
CultureLeadership
Teaming/Data-Based Decision
Making
Professional Learning &
Support
RTI Essential Components
CoreScreening
InterventionsProgress MonitoringSLD Decision Making
Research-Based Core Curriculum w/ Strong Instruction
Tier 2/3 Supplemental Intervention
ASSESSMENT
Formal DiagnosticAs needed
Progress MonitoringWeekly-Monthly
Universal Screening3 times/year
DATA-BASED DECISION MAKING
Individual Problem Solving Team
Schoolwide Screening reviewed
3 times/year
INSTRUCTION
Tier 2/3 Supplemental Intervention
Intervention Review Team
6-8 weeks
Tier 3 Individualized Intervention
Individual Problem Solving Team
6-8 weeks
SPED referral?
Oregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.orgOregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.org
Myths & Facts
Myth Fact
Myth Fact1. RTI is the new fad that will go away (i.e. “this too shall pass”)
Myth Fact1. RTI is the new fad that will go away (i.e. “this too shall pass”)
1. RTI is systematic method for delivering instruction, based on decades of research & effective large-scale implementation examples
Myth Fact1. RTI is the new fad that will go away (i.e. “this too shall pass”)
1. RTI is systematic method for delivering instruction, based on decades of research & effective large-scale implementation examples
2. Purpose of RTI is SPED identification
Myth Fact1. RTI is the new fad that will go away (i.e. “this too shall pass”)
1. RTI is systematic method for delivering instruction, based on decades of research & effective large-scale implementation examples
2. Purpose of RTI is SPED identification
2. RTI is a systematic way to support the needs of ALL students and assess SLD
In The Past
GeneralEducation
Title Reading or
Other Reading Support
Special Education
Some “Fell’”Through
Some “Fell’”Through
Full Continuum of Support
GeneralEducation
Title Reading & Reading Support,
Gifted Ed.
Special Education,Gifted Ed.IIIIIIII
all along the continuum!I =
Myth Fact1. RTI is the new fad that will go away (i.e. “this too shall pass”)
1. RTI is systematic method for delivering instruction, based on decades of research & effective large-scale implementation examples
2. Purpose of RTI is SPED identification
2. RTI is a systematic way to support the needs of ALL students
3. RTI is just about interventions
Myth Fact1. RTI is the new fad that will go away (i.e. “this too shall pass”)
1. RTI is systematic method for delivering instruction, based on decades of research & effective large-scale implementation examples
2. Purpose of RTI is SPED identification
2. RTI is a systematic way to support the needs of ALL students
3. RTI is just about interventions
3. RTI is about improving the instructional practices of ALL teachers at ALL levels of support
Oregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.orgOregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.org
It’s about core instruction
Oregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.orgOregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.org
“RTI kids”
ALL your students
Oregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.orgOregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.org
“RTI kids”
ALL your students
Oregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.orgOregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.org
“RTI Time”KINDER FIRST SECOND THIRD FOURTH FIFTH
9:009:15 Core Core Writing/ Writing/ Sm group Sm group
9:30 ERI -W Music (1) Music (1)
9:45 Sm group Sm group Core Core
10:00 ERI - H recess
10:15 Sm group recess recess
10:30 recess Core Core
10:45 Math Core recess recess11:00 Math Skill Math Skill
11:15 groups groups
11:30 LUNCH/ 11:35 LUNCH 11:40 LUNCH Writing/ Writing/
11:45 RECESS RECESS RECESS Music (1) Music (1)
12:00 Writing 12:00 LUNCH/ 12:05lUNCH/
12:15 Math Skill Math Skill RECESS RECESS
12:30 groups groups 12:45 ERI - W DD Math Math 12:40 Music, Lib, PE
1:00 PE 1:15 Core recess Math Math
1:30 Math/Music 1:45 Recess Recess 2:00 break Lib/ PE/ 1 music 2:15 Math (double dose) 2:30 Lib, 1 music **Sci/Soc St Sci/Soc St Sci/Soc St Sci/Soc St
2:45
3:00
3:10
Every minute of every day
Oregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.orgOregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.org
“RTI Room”Your entire school
Myth Fact1. RTI is the new fad that will go away (i.e. “this too shall pass”)
1. RTI is systematic method for delivering instruction, based on decades of research & effective large-scale implementation examples
2. Purpose of RTI is SPED identification
2. RTI is a systematic way to support the needs of ALL students
3. RTI is just about interventions
3. RTI is about improving the instructional practices of ALL teachers at ALL levels of support
4. RTI looks the same in every school/district
Myth Fact1. RTI is the new fad that will go away (i.e. “this too shall pass”)
1. RTI is systematic method for delivering instruction, based on decades of research & effective large-scale implementation examples
2. Purpose of RTI is SPED identification
2. RTI is a systematic way to support the needs of ALL students
3. RTI is just about interventions
3. RTI is about improving the instructional practices of ALL teachers at ALL levels of support
4. RTI looks the same in every school/district
4. RTI is uniquely designed for each building
Myth Fact1. RTI is the new fad that will go away (i.e. “this too shall pass”)
1. RTI is systematic method for delivering instruction, based on decades of research & effective large-scale implementation examples
2. Purpose of RTI is SPED identification
2. RTI is a systematic way to support the needs of ALL students
3. RTI is just about interventions
3. RTI is about improving the instructional practices of ALL teachers at ALL levels of support
4. RTI looks the same in every school/district
4. RTI is uniquely designed for each building
5. Using RTI puts you at severe risk of child find litigation
Myth Fact1. RTI is the new fad that will go away (i.e. “this too shall pass”)
1. RTI is systematic method for delivering instruction, based on decades of research & effective large-scale implementation examples
2. Purpose of RTI is SPED identification
2. RTI is a systematic way to support the needs of ALL students
3. RTI is just about interventions
3. RTI is about improving the instructional practices of ALL teachers at ALL levels of support
4. RTI looks the same in every school/district
4. RTI is uniquely designed for each building
5. Using RTI puts you at severe risk of child find litigation
5. RTI provides a proactive and legally robust way to identify students as SLD
Oregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.orgOregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.org
RTI for SLD is legally, procedurally, and ethically the right thing to do• IDEA 2004: All states MUST permit the use of
RTI• Primary features of RTI required for ALL SLD
evaluations regardless of method• Federal Register and OARS explicit that
cognitive evaluation is NOT REQUIRED• Few challenges to RTI have reached the courts
and the majority of decisions have been deferential to districts
Oregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.orgOregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.org
Myth: RTI will lead to legal trouble, especially with Child Find
LORE: The response to intervention (RTI) approach for identifying students with specific learning disabilities will generate a spate of losing litigation concerning child find under the IDEA.
(Betesh, Brown, Thompson, & Zirkel, 2012)
Oregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.orgOregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.org
Despite “dire predictions” few child find issues with RTI itself
LAW: …thus far no published court decision has specifically concerned RTI and child find, and the few pertinent hearing officer decisions have been deferential to school districts (e.g., Cobb County School District, 2012; Joshua Independent School District, 2010).
(Betesh, Brown, Thompson, & Zirkel, 2012)
IDEA Complaints in Oregon (2012-2013)
Oregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.orgOregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.org
Benefits and Outcomes
OrRTI vs. Non OrRTI District Comparison
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-1260%
65%
70%
75%
80%
85%
90%
OrRTI School Districts Non-OrRTI School Districts
School Year
% o
f Stu
dent
s (Gr
ades
3, 4
, and
5)
Mee
ting
or E
xcee
ding
(O
AKS
Read
ing)
Oregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.orgOregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.org
5 year change in % of students (K-5) at or above benchmark by school
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
Schools
% C
hang
e
47 schools, 81%
11 schools
Oregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.orgOregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.org
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
Schools
% C
hang
e5 year change in % of students (K-5) well
below benchmark/intensive by school
41 schools, 71%
17 schools
Oregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.orgOregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.org
Districts Implementing RTI
Effectively
Oregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.orgOregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.org
The Importance of Effective Core
Instruction (Cadre 1)
Oregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.orgOregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.org
Cadre 1: Core Implementation
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-1130
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
50.6
K-5 DIBELS Growth*
Core 1
School Year
Perc
ent a
t or a
bove
Ben
chm
ark
+1.7%
*K – NWF; 1st-5th – grade ORF
School has 90-minute (or less) reading block* (interventions occur WITHIN the core)*60 minute block for ½ day kindergarten
Oregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.orgOregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.org
Cadre 1: Core Implementation
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-1130
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
55.5
50.6
K-5 DIBELS Growth*
Core 2
Core 1
School Year
Perc
ent a
t or a
bove
Ben
chm
ark
+8.3%
*K – NWF; 1st-5th – grade ORF
School has 90-minute reading block* (interventions occur OUTSIDE of the core)
+1.7%
Oregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.orgOregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.org
Cadre 1: Core Implementation
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-1130
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
61.8
55.5
50.6
K-5 DIBELS Growth*
Core 3Core 2Core 1
School Year
Perc
ent a
t or a
bove
Ben
chm
ark +16.5%
*K – NWF; 1st-5th – grade ORF
School has a 90-minute reading block* (interventions occur OUTSIDE of the core)
ANDCommon, agreed-upon grade-level instructional strategies.
+8.3%+1.7%
Oregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.orgOregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.org
What Matters Most is…
…what teachers do
Oregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.orgOregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.org
Tigard-Tualatin School District
% of 3rd, 4th, & 5th Graders who Met or Exceeded on OAKS Reading (difference from Oregon State average)
School Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-13
-15.0%
-10.0%
-5.0%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
School Year
Oregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.orgOregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.org
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
-15.0%
-10.0%
-5.0%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
Baker School DistrictCadre 3
% of 3rd, 4th, & 5th Graders who Met or Exceeded on OAKS Reading (difference from Oregon State average)
School Year
= Year 1 in OrRTI
Oregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.orgOregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.org
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
-15.0%
-10.0%
-5.0%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
Central Curry School DistrictCadre 4
% of 3rd, 4th, & 5th Graders who Met or Exceeded on OAKS Reading (difference from Oregon State average)
School Year
= Year 1 in OrRTI
Oregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.orgOregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.org
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
-15.0%
-10.0%
-5.0%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
Bend-LaPine School DistrictCadre 5
% of 3rd, 4th, & 5th Graders who Met or Exceeded on OAKS Reading (difference from Oregon State average)
School Year
= Year 1 in OrRTI
Oregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.orgOregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.org
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
-15.0%
-10.0%
-5.0%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
Bandon School DistrictCadre 6
% of 3rd, 4th, & 5th Graders who Met or Exceeded on OAKS Reading (difference from Oregon State average)
School Year
= Year 1 in OrRTI
Oregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.orgOregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.org
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
-15.0%
-10.0%
-5.0%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
Sisters School DistrictCadre 6
% of 3rd, 4th, & 5th Graders who Met or Exceeded on OAKS Reading (difference from Oregon State average)
School Year
= Year 1 in OrRTI
Oregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.orgOregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.org
Student Achievement
How are you doing?
Oregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.orgOregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.org
Impact on SPED: Research Support
“Use of RTI has resulted in lower rates of SLD (Burns, Appleton, & Stehouwer, 2005) improved proportionality or indicators of equity, earlier delivery of special education services, and increased student achievement (Marston, Muyskens, Lau, & Canter, 2003)”
A. M. VanDerheyden & M. K. Burns (2010)
Oregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.orgOregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.org
Identification Rates: OrRTI
Avg. % of Students Identified SLD
24 out of 29 districts moved in the direction of the mean
State Average: 2011 3.1
OrRTI Cadres 1-6 Prior to Entering 4.7OrRTI Cadres 1-6 in 2011 (at least 1 year after entering) 3.5
Reduction 26%
Oregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.orgOregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.org
Implementation Considerations
Oregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.orgOregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.org
Lessons Learned… In the beginning, OrRTI focused on the
WHAT
RTI Essential Components
CoreScreening
InterventionsProgress MonitoringSLD Decision Making
Oregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.orgOregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.org
NOW…
We focus much more on the
HOW
Data-Based
Decision Making
with Decision
Rules
Training CoachingFidelity
Standards of
Practice
CultureLeadership
Teaming/Data-Based Decision
Making
Professional Learning &
Support
RTI Essential Components
Oregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.orgOregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.org
Oregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.orgOregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.org
In the Beginning…
It was all about interventions
Oregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.orgOregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.org
It’s all about the Core, and strong, articulated instruction across all Tiers
Today…
Oregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.orgOregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.org
In the Beginning…We Thought Rome was Built in a Day
Oregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.orgOregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.org
Now we know it takes at least 3 years!
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5TIER
1ExploreInstall
Implement
TIER 2/3
ExploreInstall
Implement
SPED
ExploreInstall
Implement
Oregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.orgOregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.org
How do we support the WHAT
and the HOW?• Conference style trainings with a
twist• On-site coaching, consultation, and
co-training• Lab School visits• Remote Consultation• Web-based resources
– www.oregonrti.org
1 Goal: Help districts build internal capacity to
Train Sustain
Innovate
Oregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.orgOregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.org
Oregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.orgOregon Response to Intervention
www.oregonrti.org
Thank You!
• David Putnam, Director, OrRTI– [email protected]