Introduction to Irene’s talk (reminder) Coincidence window 500s GWHEN group, Astropart. Phys. 35 (2011) 1-7 Ph. D Thesis of I. Di Palma (AEI) Ph. D

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 Better angular accuracy than if taking random track solution  Smaller search box for GW detectors Two possible tracks (Mirror solution) Two possible azimuth values (Same zenith) ● ● ● ● ● ● Track 1 Track 2 Detector line Reconstruction used Events reconstructed with 2 lines == Due to simplified detector geometry == The version of the reconstruction offers the possibility to get the azimuth of the mirror solution in the case of events reconstructed with two lines

Citation preview

Introduction to Irenes talk (reminder) Coincidence window 500s GWHEN group, Astropart. Phys. 35 (2011) 1-7 Ph. D Thesis of I. Di Palma (AEI) Ph. D Thesis of B. Bouhou (APC) Updates on this work: - 17 May - 20 May Clermont-Ferrand meeting (2010) - 20 Sep - 24 Sep Paris meeting (2010) - 22 Nov - 25 Nov Amsterdam meeting (2010) - 07 Feb - 10 Feb CERN meeting (2011) - 06 Jun - 10 Jun Moscow meeting (2011) Internal note: ANTARES-PHYS wiki page:The selection criteria follow G. Halladjians strategy Optimization for (steady) PS E -2 Unblinding granted before summer 2010 (Referee: Aart Heijboer) The 2007 analysis scheme (triggered search) Data and MC samples lifetime of the selected data sample: days (37.8 days for 10pe and 65.5 days for 3pe high threshold) Data sample The coincident period of 5L/S5/VSR1 is between January 27th and September 30th, 2007 Simulation package: Genhen, weight : Bartol flux energy range between 10 GeV and 10 7 GeV Simulation package : Corsika, weight : Battistonis parameterization Atmospheric neutrinos : Atmospheric muons: Simulation package: Genhen w eighted with a E -2 energy spectrum Data and MC sample are reconstructed with the BBfit reconstruction package (v3r6) Cosmic neutrinos : MC sample Better angular accuracy than if taking random track solution Smaller search box for GW detectors Two possible tracks (Mirror solution) Two possible azimuth values (Same zenith) Track 1 Track 2 Detector line Reconstruction used Events reconstructed with 2 lines == Due to simplified detector geometry == The version of the reconstruction offers the possibility to get the azimuth of the mirror solution in the case of events reconstructed with two lines Cut optimization Cut are applied to maximize the discovery potential in search for E -2 point sources Only up-going events are considered. Method : test statistics LR to get optimum n sig Different values of track and bright point 2 for different zenith angles are tested 70 possible combinations G. Halladjian, Ph. D, University Marseilles, Dec 2010 Chosen cuts (up-going events) b 2 >2.2 (reduced contamination of atmospheric muons) t 2