11
Introduction to FACET & Test Facilities and charge to SAREC committee Vitaly Yakimenko June 25, 2013

Introduction to FACET & Test Facilities and charge to SAREC committee Vitaly Yakimenko June 25, 2013

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Introduction to FACET & Test Facilities and charge to SAREC committee Vitaly Yakimenko June 25, 2013

Introduction to FACET & Test Facilities and charge to SAREC committee

Vitaly Yakimenko

June 25, 2013

Page 2: Introduction to FACET & Test Facilities and charge to SAREC committee Vitaly Yakimenko June 25, 2013

2

FY13 run

Nimble scheduling for FY13 run was a necessity

SAREC meeting, July 25, 2013, V. Yakimenko

5 months long commissioning/running

• Four beam configurations (some uncertainty in time to develop)

• Configurations were progressively more difficult

• Uncertain schedule for commissioning of the ionization laser

Wee

ks

Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep0

0.51

1.52

2.53

3.54

Series4StartupCommisioning

Page 3: Introduction to FACET & Test Facilities and charge to SAREC committee Vitaly Yakimenko June 25, 2013

3

Beam time delivery by configuration

Pencil Beam22%

Low Charge Compressed

11%High Charge Compressed

49%

Laser com-missioning

7%

Two Bunch11%

Users requests and justifications will set time allocation for FY14 run

SAREC meeting, July 25, 2013, V. Yakimenko

Page 4: Introduction to FACET & Test Facilities and charge to SAREC committee Vitaly Yakimenko June 25, 2013

4

FY13 Run Time Distribution (total 3616 hrs.)

Scheduled off29%

Accelerator down11%

Scheduled recovery activity11%

Machine studies36%

Beam tuning4%

Experiment user 8%

Experiment user off1%

Smaller fraction of “Scheduled off” (mainly laser installation) and “Machine studies” are expected in next run. Accelerator availability was ~85%.

SAREC meeting, July 25, 2013, V. Yakimenko

Page 5: Introduction to FACET & Test Facilities and charge to SAREC committee Vitaly Yakimenko June 25, 2013

5

Planning for FY14 run

FY14 is expected to have much more user experimental time.Efficient use will be main challenge

Two part run is planned for FY14:

• Sept.30-Dec.20: Two bunch PWFA in 1.5m oven, positrons testing

• Feb.2-Jun.30: Beam time shared between ~12 experiments

LCLS II construction schedule is not finalized

Oct

Nov Dec Jan

Feb Mar Apr

May Ju

n Jul

Aug Sep0

1

2

3

4

StartupCommisioningMD & RunningW

eeks

SAREC meeting, July 25, 2013, V. Yakimenko

Page 6: Introduction to FACET & Test Facilities and charge to SAREC committee Vitaly Yakimenko June 25, 2013

6

Norbert Holtkamp, AD Director

Robert Hettel, DeputyJohn Seeman, Deputy

ESH/QAJohn Seabury

Administrative Office

Business OfficeCindy Lowe

Accelerator Operations & Safety

R. Erickson

Mechanical Eng. &

Technical Support

K. Fant

Instrumen-tation & Controls

T. Himel

Accelerator Systems Division

A. Brachmann

RF Accelerator Research &

Eng. Division

M. Fazio

Accelerator Research Division

R. Hettel (acting)

S0-20 Accelerator

Laser Support

Facilities & Rad. Physics

AD Organizational chart (FY13 restructuring)

FACET Division

V. Yakimenko

FY13 restructuring of S0-20 Linac operations resulted in efficient FACET run

SAREC meeting, July 25, 2013, V. Yakimenko

Page 7: Introduction to FACET & Test Facilities and charge to SAREC committee Vitaly Yakimenko June 25, 2013

7

FACET and Test facilities division (FY14 restructuring)FACET and Test

Facilities

V. Yakimenko

M. Hogan, Deputy

Experimental Program

M. Hogan

Science at FACET

M. Hogan

Science at NLCTA

E. Hemsing

Science at ESTB

C. Hast

Science at ASTA

TBD

Test Facilities

C. Hast

User Coordination

C. Clarke

SLAC User Office

C. Knotts

FACET/ESTB User area

C. Hast

NLCTA/ASTA Operations

TBD

Technical Support

TBD

Controls

TBD

Linac Operations

M. Sullivan

Lasers

B. White

External Program Review Committee

(SAREC)

Safety

J. Kenny

Matrixed

SAREC meeting, July 25, 2013, V. Yakimenko

Page 8: Introduction to FACET & Test Facilities and charge to SAREC committee Vitaly Yakimenko June 25, 2013

8

Program Advisory Committee & User meetings

• Updates from six experiments that did use beam time in FY13 is

expected.

• 12 new proposals are submitted in addition to already ongoing

programs:

• 8 for FACET (one will be first tried at ESTB and one at NLCTA) • 3 for NLCTA• 1 for ASTA

• Detector R&D experiments at ESTB are reviewed by separate

committee

FACET time is oversubscribed

SAREC meeting, July 25, 2013, V. Yakimenko

Page 9: Introduction to FACET & Test Facilities and charge to SAREC committee Vitaly Yakimenko June 25, 2013

9

Charge to the Program Advisory Committee

• Evaluate the scientific merit and rate the technical risk of

the NEW proposals for the SLAC Accelerator Test Facilities.

• Determine whether the new proposals would be appropriate at

this time or in the future.

• Review existing R&D results at the SLAC Accelerator Test

Facilities and which elements need further in-depth analysis

(for example):

• Is the science unique and is the progress compelling?• Is the program making effective use of facility and lab resources?• Could the program be enhanced by expanding the collaboration?• Comment on the synergy of the programs within and between the

facilities. Are there opportunities SLAC should pursue? What

would be needed to successfully realize these opportunities?

SAREC meeting, July 25, 2013, V. Yakimenko

Page 10: Introduction to FACET & Test Facilities and charge to SAREC committee Vitaly Yakimenko June 25, 2013

10

Schedule

Page 11: Introduction to FACET & Test Facilities and charge to SAREC committee Vitaly Yakimenko June 25, 2013

11

Schedule

SAREC meeting, July 25, 2013, V. Yakimenko