80
[email protected] Version: November 2020 Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy Introduction The OECD, in cooperation with the EU, has developed a harmonised definition of functional urban areas (FUAs). Being composed of a city (or core) and its commuting zone, FUAs encompass the economic and functional extent of cities based on daily people’s movements (OECD, 2012); (Dijkstra, Poelman, & Veneri, 2019). The definition of FUA aims at providing a functional/economic definition of cities and their area of influence, by maximising international comparability and overcoming the limitation of using purely administrative approaches. At the same time, the concept of FUA, unlike other approaches, ensures a minimum link to the government level of the city or metropolitan area. FUAs are listed below by size, according to four classes: • Small FUAs, with population between 50,000 and 100,000 • Medium-sized FUAs, with population between 100,000 and 250,000 • Metropolitan FUAs, with population between 250,000 and 1.5 million • Large metropolitan FUAs, with population above 1.5 million A city is a group of local administrative units (i.e. LAU for European countries, such as municipality, local authorities, etc.) where at least 50% of its population live in an urban centre. An urban centre is defined as a cluster of contiguous grid cells of one square kilometer with a density of at least 1,500 inhabitants per square kilometer and a population of at least 50,000 inhabitants overall. The commuting zone is composed of the local administrative units for which at least 15% of their workforce commute to the city. Commuting zones of the functional areas are identified based on commuting data (travel from home-to-work). Commuting data are also used to define whether more than one city share the same commuting zone in a single polycentric functional urban area. The list of functional urban areas takes into account the results of the consultation with the European National Statistical Institutes launched by Eurostat in June 2011 on the definition of cities and by the OECD with Delegates from the Working Party on Territorial Indicators. This list of functional urban areas may be reviewed on the basis of additional comments provided by countries. The OECD Metropolitan Database provides a set of economic, environmental, social and demographic modelled indicators on the 668 OECD metropolitan areas (functional urban areas with 250 000 or more inhabitants). Additionally, interactive maps, histograms and summary profiles of each metropolitan area are available on the OECD Regions and Cities Data Visualisation tool. Note: This document includes information as of 2019.

Introduction - OECDRancagua CL014 Metropolitan area 360 000 70 San Antonio CL012 Medium-sized area 132 000 71 San Fernando CL015 Small area 75 000 100 Santiago CL011 Large metropolitan

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Introduction

    The OECD, in cooperation with the EU, has developed a harmonised definition of functional urban areas (FUAs). Being

    composed of a city (or core) and its commuting zone, FUAs encompass the economic and functional extent of cities based on

    daily people’s movements (OECD, 2012); (Dijkstra, Poelman, & Veneri, 2019). The definition of FUA aims at providing a

    functional/economic definition of cities and their area of influence, by maximising international comparability and overcoming

    the limitation of using purely administrative approaches. At the same time, the concept of FUA, unlike other approaches,

    ensures a minimum link to the government level of the city or metropolitan area.

    FUAs are listed below by size, according to four classes:

    • Small FUAs, with population between 50,000 and 100,000

    • Medium-sized FUAs, with population between 100,000 and 250,000

    • Metropolitan FUAs, with population between 250,000 and 1.5 million

    • Large metropolitan FUAs, with population above 1.5 million

    A city is a group of local administrative units (i.e. LAU for European countries, such as municipality, local authorities, etc.)

    where at least 50% of its population live in an urban centre. An urban centre is defined as a cluster of contiguous grid cells of

    one square kilometer with a density of at least 1,500 inhabitants per square kilometer and a population of at least 50,000

    inhabitants overall.

    The commuting zone is composed of the local administrative units for which at least 15% of their workforce commute to the

    city. Commuting zones of the functional areas are identified based on commuting data (travel from home-to-work). Commuting

    data are also used to define whether more than one city share the same commuting zone in a single polycentric functional

    urban area.

    The list of functional urban areas takes into account the results of the consultation with the European National Statistical

    Institutes launched by Eurostat in June 2011 on the definition of cities and by the OECD with Delegates from the Working

    Party on Territorial Indicators. This list of functional urban areas may be reviewed on the basis of additional comments provided

    by countries. The OECD Metropolitan Database provides a set of economic, environmental, social and demographic modelled

    indicators on the 668 OECD metropolitan areas (functional urban areas with 250 000 or more inhabitants).

    Additionally, interactive maps, histograms and summary profiles of each metropolitan area are available on the OECD

    Regions and Cities Data Visualisation tool.

    Note: This document includes information as of 2019.

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policyhttps://regions-cities-atlas.oecd.org/https://regions-cities-atlas.oecd.org/

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Australia

    Note: This map is for illustrative purposes and is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory covered by

    these maps.

    The population grid used to create the FUAs in Australia is the 2015 Global Human Settlement (GHS) grid. The geographic

    building blocks are the Statistical Areas Level 2 (SA2).

    Table 1. List of functional urban areas

    FUA name FUA code Size class Population in 2015 (GHS)

    Share of population living in the city (%)

    Ballarat AUS18 Medium-sized area 130 000 66

    Bendigo AUS19 Medium-sized area 107 000 65

    Cairns AUS15 Medium-sized area 162 000 59

    Canberra AUS07 Metropolitan area 400 000 74

    Geelong AUS14 Metropolitan area 273 000 60

    Gold Coast AUS06 Metropolitan area 548 000 56

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Greater Adelaide AUS05 Metropolitan area 1 354 000 87

    Greater Brisbane AUS03 Large metropolitan area 2 262 000 72

    Greater Darwin AUS16 Medium-sized area 130 000 39

    Greater Hobart AUS12 Medium-sized area 214 000 32

    Greater Melbourne AUS02 Large metropolitan area 4 445 000 87

    Greater Perth AUS04 Large metropolitan area 1 891 000 74

    Greater Sydney AUS01 Large metropolitan area 4 738 000 87

    Newcastle AUS08 Metropolitan area 455 000 62

    Sunshine Coast AUS11 Metropolitan area 233 000 37

    Toowoomba AUS17 Medium-sized area 171 000 58

    Townsville AUS13 Medium-sized area 193 000 65

    Wollongong AUS10 Metropolitan area 273 000 49

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Austria

    Note: This map is for illustrative purposes and is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory covered by

    these maps.

    The population grid used to create the FUAs in Austria is the 2011 Geostat grid. The geographic building blocks are the LAU-

    2 units. Commuting data comes from the 2011 Census.

    Table 1. List of functional urban areas

    FUA name FUA code Size class Population in 2015 (GHS)

    Share of population living in the city (%)

    Graz AT002 Metropolitan area 633 000 43

    Innsbruck AT005 Metropolitan area 334 000 37

    Klagenfurt AT006 Metropolitan area 251 000 38

    Linz AT003 Metropolitan area 624 000 30

    Salzburg AT004 Metropolitan area 362 000 40

    Vienna AT001 Large metropolitan area 2 828 000 62

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Belgium

    Note: This map is for illustrative purposes and is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory covered by

    these maps.

    The population grid used to create the FUAs in Belgium is the 2011 Geostat grid. The geographic building blocks are the LAU-

    2 units.

    Table 1. List of functional urban areas

    FUA name FUA code Size class Population in 2015 (GHS)

    Share of population living in the city (%)

    Antwerp BE002 Metropolitan area 1 123 000 44

    Bruges BE006 Medium-sized area 241 000 49

    Brussels BE001 Large metropolitan area 3 218 000 3

    Charleroi BE004 Metropolitan area 507 000 100

    Gent BE003 Metropolitan area 633 000 39

    Kortrijk BE010 Medium-sized area 202 000 32

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Leuven BE008 Medium-sized area 222 000 39

    Liege BE005 Metropolitan area 789 000 100

    Mechelen BE012 Medium-sized area 115 000 70

    Mons BE009 Medium-sized area 249 000 100

    Mouscron BE013 Small area 70 000 82

    Namur BE007 Medium-sized area 262 000 42

    Ostend BE011 Medium-sized area 125 000 51

    Verviers (greater city) BE015 Medium-sized area 108 000 100

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Canada

    Note: This map is for illustrative purposes and is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory covered by

    these maps.

    The population grid used to create the FUAs in Canada is the 2015 Global Human Settlement (GHS) grid. The geographic

    building blocks are the Census Subdivisions. Commuting data comes from the 2016 Census.

    Table 1. List of functional urban areas

    FUA name FUA code Size class Population in 2015 (GHS)

    Share of population living in the city (%)

    Abbotsford CAN21 Medium-sized area 190 000 77

    Brantford CAN24 Medium-sized area 141 000 70

    Calgary CAN05 Large metropolitan area 1 502 000 82

    Edmonton CAN06 Metropolitan area 1 333 000 81

    Guelph CAN22 Medium-sized area 181 000 70

    Halifax CAN12 Metropolitan area 461 000 88

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Hamilton CAN09 Metropolitan area 628 000 87

    Kitchener CAN11 Metropolitan area 566 000 83

    London CAN10 Metropolitan area 568 000 68

    Montreal CAN02 Large metropolitan area 4 326 000 75

    Niagara Falls CAN26 Small area 85 000 100

    Ottawa CAN04 Large metropolitan area 1 500 000 84

    Peterborough CAN25 Medium-sized area 119 000 68

    Quebec CAN07 Metropolitan area 894 000 64

    Red Deer CAN23 Medium-sized area 182 000 54

    Regina CAN20 Medium-sized area 207 000 100

    Saskatoon CAN15 Metropolitan area 283 000 87

    Sherbrooke CAN16 Metropolitan area 262 000 63

    St Catharines CAN17 Medium-sized area 208 000 64

    St Johns CAN19 Medium-sized area 203 000 56

    Toronto CAN01 Large metropolitan area 7 070 000 89

    Trois Rivieres CAN18 Medium-sized area 200 000 68

    Vancouver CAN03 Large metropolitan area 2 509 000 88

    Victoria CAN13 Metropolitan area 357 000 63

    Windsor CAN14 Metropolitan area 345 000 58

    Winnipeg CAN08 Metropolitan area 849 000 83

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Switzerland

    Note: This map is for illustrative purposes and is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory covered by

    these maps.

    The population grid used to create the FUAs in Switzerland is the 2011 Geostat grid. The geographic building blocks are the

    LAU-2 units. Commuting data comes from the 2011 Census.

    Table 1. List of functional urban areas

    FUA name FUA code Size class Population in 2015 (GHS)

    Share of population living in the city (%)

    Basel CH003 Metropolitan area 510 000 28

    Bern CH004 Metropolitan area 402 000 30

    Biel/Bienne CH010 Medium-sized area 101 000 55

    Geneva CH002 Metropolitan area 571 000 35

    Lausanne CH005 Metropolitan area 403 000 31

    Lucerne CH008 Medium-sized area 214 000 32

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Lugano CH009 Medium-sized area 147 000 37

    St. Gallen CH007 Medium-sized area 163 000 45

    Thun CH011 Small area 37 000 100

    Winterthur CH006 Medium-sized area 141 000 76

    Zug CH012 Small area 23 000 100

    Zurich CH001 Metropolitan area 1 333 000 29

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Chile

    Note: This map is for illustrative purposes and is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory covered by

    these maps.

    The population grid used to create the FUAs in Chile is the 2015 Global Human Settlement (GHS) grid. The geographic

    building blocks are the communes. Commuting data comes from the 2002 Census.

    Table 1. List of functional urban areas

    FUA name FUA code Size class Population in 2015 (GHS)

    Share of population living in the city (%)

    Antofagasta CL004 Metropolitan area 390 000 100

    Arica CL001 Medium-sized area 169 000 100

    Calama CL003 Medium-sized area 149 000 100

    Calera CL008 Small area 54 000 100

    Chillan CL019 Medium-sized area 223 000 96

    Concepcion CL020 Metropolitan area 949 000 49

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Copiapo CL005 Medium-sized area 177 000 100

    Coquimbo-La Serena CL006 Metropolitan area 472 000 98

    Curico CL016 Medium-sized area 156 000 94

    Iquique CL002 Medium-sized area 186 000 100

    Linares CL018 Small area 92 000 100

    Los Angeles CL021 Medium-sized area 212 000 100

    Melipilla CL013 Medium-sized area 111 000 100

    Osorno CL024 Medium-sized area 168 000 100

    Ovalle CL007 Medium-sized area 111 000 100

    Puerto Montt CL025 Metropolitan area 263 000 100

    Punta Arenas CL026 Medium-sized area 123 000 100

    Quillota CL009 Medium-sized area 111 000 84

    Rancagua CL014 Metropolitan area 360 000 70

    San Antonio CL012 Medium-sized area 132 000 71

    San Fernando CL015 Small area 75 000 100

    Santiago CL011 Large metropolitan area 7 182 000 94

    Talca CL017 Metropolitan area 284 000 92

    Temuco CL022 Metropolitan area 474 000 87

    Valdivia CL023 Metropolitan area 166 000 100

    Valparaiso CL010 Metropolitan area 960 000 88

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Colombia

    Note: This map is for illustrative purposes and is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory covered by

    these maps.

    The population grid used to create the FUAs in Colombia is the 2015 Global Human Settlement (GHS) grid. The geographic

    building blocks are the municipalities. Commuting data comes from the 2005 Census.

    Table 1. List of functional urban areas

    FUA name FUA code Size class Population in 2015 (GHS)

    Share of population living in the city (%)

    Aguachica COL48 Small area 90 000 100

    Apartado COL28 Medium-sized area 145 000 100

    Arauca COL50 Small area 114 000 100

    Armenia COL13 Metropolitan area 403 000 92

    Barrancabermeja COL22 Medium-sized area 196 000 100

    Barranquilla COL04 Large metropolitan area 2 214 000 88

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Bogota D.C. COL01 Large metropolitan area 8 953 000 99

    Bucaramanga COL06 Metropolitan area 1 159 000 100

    Buenaventura COL17 Metropolitan area 393 000 100

    Cali COL03 Large metropolitan area 2 599 000 97

    Cartagena COL05 Metropolitan area 1 181 000 79

    Cartago COL30 Medium-sized area 129 000 100

    Caucasia COL46 Medium-sized area 96 000 100

    Cienaga COL41 Medium-sized area 104 000 100

    Cucuta COL07 Metropolitan area 792 000 100

    Duitama COL39 Medium-sized area 104 000 100

    El Carmen de Bolivar COL52 Small area 64 000 100

    Espinal COL49 Small area 78 000 100

    Facatativa COL38 Medium-sized area 135 000 100

    Florence COL27 Medium-sized area 185 000 100

    Fundacion COL53 Small area 58 000 100

    Fusagasuga COL37 Medium-sized area 131 000 100

    Girardot COL29 Medium-sized area 124 000 100

    Guadalajara de Buga COL34 Medium-sized area 108 000 100

    Ibague COL09 Metropolitan area 568 000 100

    Ipiales COL35 Medium-sized area 137 000 96

    La Dorada COL45 Small area 89 000 100

    Magangue COL32 Medium-sized area 121 000 100

    Maicao COL31 Medium-sized area 156 000 100

    Manizales COL10 Metropolitan area 439 000 100

    Medellin COL02 Large metropolitan area 3 578 000 99

    Monteria COL15 Metropolitan area 433 000 100

    Neiva COL18 Metropolitan area 335 000 100

    Ocana COL44 Medium-sized area 93 000 100

    Palmira COL19 Metropolitan area 304 000 100

    Pasto COL12 Metropolitan area 414 000 100

    Pereira COL08 Metropolitan area 666 000 100

    Popayan COL20 Metropolitan area 294 000 100

    Quibdo COL36 Medium-sized area 145 000 100

    Riohacha COL25 Metropolitan area 244 000 100

    Rionegro COL43 Medium-sized area 111 000 100

    Sabanalarga COL47 Medium-sized area 94 000 100

    San Andres de Tumaco COL26 Medium-sized area 163 000 100

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Santa Marta COL11 Metropolitan area 479 000 100

    Santa Rosa de Cabal COL51 Small area 66 000 100

    Sincelejo COL21 Metropolitan area 271 000 100

    Sogamoso COL33 Medium-sized area 106 000 100

    Tulua COL23 Medium-sized area 203 000 100

    Tunja COL24 Medium-sized area 207 000 85

    Valledupar COL16 Metropolitan area 433 000 100

    Villavicencio COL14 Metropolitan area 462 000 100

    Yopal COL40 Medium-sized area 194 000 100

    Zipaquira COL42 Medium-sized area 120 000 100

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Czech Republic

    Note: This map is for illustrative purposes and is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory covered by

    these maps.

    The population grid used to create the FUAs in Czech Republic is the 2011 Geostat grid. The geographic building blocks are

    the LAU-2 units. Commuting data comes from the 2011 Census.

    Table 1. List of functional urban areas

    FUA name FUA code Size class Population in 2015 (GHS)

    Share of population living in the city (%)

    Brno CZ002 Metropolitan area 732 000 53

    Carlsbad CZ013 Small area 89 000 52

    Ceske Budejovice CZ008 Medium-sized area 183 000 49

    Chomutov CZ018 Small area 80 000 80

    Hradec Kralove CZ009 Medium-sized area 154 000 61

    Jihlava CZ014 Medium-sized area 100 000 50

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Liberec CZ007 Medium-sized area 145 000 72

    Most CZ016 Medium-sized area 99 000 61

    Olomouc CZ006 Medium-sized area 207 000 48

    Ostrava CZ003 Metropolitan area 702 000 59

    Pardubice CZ010 Medium-sized area 201 000 44

    Plzen CZ004 Metropolitan area 348 000 49

    Prague CZ001 Large metropolitan area 2 249 000 61

    Usti nad Labem CZ005 Medium-sized area 119 000 77

    Zlin CZ011 Medium-sized area 145 000 48

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Germany

    Note: This map is for illustrative purposes and is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory covered by

    these maps.

    The population grid used to create the FUAs in Germany is the 2011 Geostat grid. The geographic building blocks are the

    NUTS-3 units. Commuting data comes from the Register.

    Table 1. List of functional urban areas

    FUA name FUA code Size class Population in 2015 (GHS)

    Share of population living in the city (%)

    Aachen DE507 Metropolitan area 532 000 43

    Aschaffenburg DE061 Metropolitan area 371 000 18

    Augsburg DE033 Metropolitan area 648 000 41

    Bamberg DE062 Medium-sized area 218 000 33

    Bayreuth DE059 Medium-sized area 249 000 28

    Berlin DE001 Large metropolitan area 4 950 000 71

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Bielefeld DE017 Metropolitan area 332 000 100

    Bocholt, Stadt DE549 Metropolitan area 374 000 20

    Bonn DE034 Metropolitan area 894 000 41

    Brandenburg an der Havel

    DE056 Small area 73 000 100

    Braunschweig-Salzgitter Wolfsburg

    DE083 Metropolitan area 976 000 47

    Bremen DE012 Metropolitan area 1 238 000 44

    Bremerhaven DE527 Metropolitan area 304 000 36

    Celle DE060 Medium-sized area 176 000 39

    Chemnitz DE505 Medium-sized area 239 000 100

    Cologne DE004 Large metropolitan area 1 949 000 68

    Constance DE054 Metropolitan area 268 000 29

    Cottbus DE539 Medium-sized area 223 000 45

    Darmstadt DE025 Metropolitan area 438 000 35

    Dessau DE082 Small area 90 000 100

    Dresden DE009 Metropolitan area 1 316 000 40

    Duren, Stadt DE548 Metropolitan area 256 000 34

    Dusseldorf DE011 Large metropolitan area 1 526 000 49

    Erfurt DE032 Metropolitan area 517 000 40

    Flensburg DE052 Metropolitan area 273 000 29

    Frankfurt DE029 Small area 56 000 100

    Frankfurt am Main DE005 Large metropolitan area 2 573 000 35

    Freiburg im Breisgau DE027 Metropolitan area 629 000 35

    Friedrichshafen DE072 Medium-sized area 208 000 28

    Fulda DE065 Medium-sized area 218 000 29

    Gera DE535 Medium-sized area 191 000 48

    Giessen DE057 Metropolitan area 257 000 30

    Gorlitz DE074 Metropolitan area 254 000 20

    Gottingen DE021 Metropolitan area 449 000 26

    Greifswald DE078 Medium-sized area 235 000 23

    Halle an der Saale DE018 Metropolitan area 415 000 55

    Hamburg DE002 Large metropolitan area 3 176 000 55

    Hanover DE013 Metropolitan area 1 269 000 41

    Heidelberg DE522 Metropolitan area 688 000 23

    Heilbronn DE529 Metropolitan area 444 000 26

    Hildesheim DE542 Metropolitan area 275 000 36

    Ingolstadt DE534 Metropolitan area 471 000 28

    Iserlohn DE045 Metropolitan area 419 000 22

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Jena DE547 Medium-sized area 193 000 57

    Kaiserslautern DE044 Metropolitan area 273 000 35

    Karlsruhe DE035 Metropolitan area 733 000 41

    Kassel DE513 Metropolitan area 430 000 44

    Kempten (Allgau) DE066 Medium-sized area 217 000 31

    Kiel DE039 Metropolitan area 631 000 37

    Koblenz DE042 Metropolitan area 326 000 34

    Krefeld DE508 Medium-sized area 218 000 100

    Landshut DE067 Medium-sized area 218 000 30

    Leipzig DE008 Metropolitan area 972 000 53

    Lubeck DE510 Metropolitan area 400 000 53

    Luneburg DE058 Medium-sized area 180 000 40

    Magdeburg DE019 Metropolitan area 490 000 47

    Mainz DE037 Metropolitan area 416 000 50

    Mannheim-Ludwigshafen

    DE084 Metropolitan area 1 139 000 47

    Marburg DE053 Medium-sized area 241 000 30

    Monchengladbach DE036 Metropolitan area 252 000 100

    Muenster DE504 Metropolitan area 526 000 59

    Munich DE003 Large metropolitan area 2 825 000 50

    Neubrandenburg DE064 Metropolitan area 251 000 23

    Neumunster DE055 Small area 76 000 100

    Nuremberg DE014 Metropolitan area 1 299 000 55

    Offenburg DE073 Metropolitan area 417 000 14

    Oldenburg (Oldenburg) DE520 Metropolitan area 411 000 38

    Osnabruck DE517 Metropolitan area 508 000 31

    Paderborn DE523 Metropolitan area 302 000 48

    Passau DE081 Medium-sized area 241 000 21

    Pforzheim DE533 Metropolitan area 308 000 37

    Plauen DE063 Medium-sized area 229 000 27

    Regensburg DE028 Metropolitan area 446 000 31

    Remscheid DE530 Medium-sized area 109 000 100

    Reutlingen DE537 Metropolitan area 273 000 41

    Rosenheim DE069 Metropolitan area 308 000 19

    Rostock DE043 Metropolitan area 406 000 48

    Ruhr DE038 Large metropolitan area 5 017 000 71

    Saarbrucken DE040 Metropolitan area 792 000 22

    Schweinfurt DE077 Metropolitan area 268 000 19

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Schwerin DE031 Metropolitan area 296 000 30

    Siegen DE540 Metropolitan area 402 000 24

    Solingen DE516 Medium-sized area 156 000 100

    Stralsund DE071 Medium-sized area 209 000 24

    Stuttgart DE007 Large metropolitan area 2 661 000 31

    Trier DE026 Metropolitan area 258 000 43

    Tubingen DE050 Medium-sized area 216 000 39

    Ulm DE532 Metropolitan area 475 000 36

    Villingen-Schwenningen DE051 Medium-sized area 204 000 39

    Weimar DE030 Medium-sized area 144 000 44

    Wetzlar DE079 Metropolitan area 253 000 20

    Wiesbaden DE020 Metropolitan area 455 000 60

    Wilhelmshaven DE048 Medium-sized area 171 000 43

    Wuppertal DE546 Metropolitan area 328 000 100

    Wurzburg DE524 Metropolitan area 499 000 25

    Zwickau DE544 Metropolitan area 323 000 28

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Denmark

    Note: This map is for illustrative purposes and is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory covered by

    these maps.

    The population grid used to create the FUAs in Denmark is the 2011 Geostat grid. The geographic building blocks are the

    LAU-1 units. Commuting data comes from the Register.

    Table 1. List of functional urban areas

    FUA name FUA code Size class Population in 2015 (GHS)

    Share of population living in the city (%)

    Aalborg DK004 Metropolitan area 296 000 65

    Aarhus DK002 Metropolitan area 486 000 65

    Copenhagen DK001 Large metropolitan area 1 799 000 32

    Odense DK003 Metropolitan area 363 000 52

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Spain

    Note: This map is for illustrative purposes and is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory covered by

    these maps.

    The population grid used to create the FUAs in Spain is the 2011 Geostat grid. The geographic building blocks are the LAU-

    2 units. Commuting data comes from the 2011 Census.

    Table 1. List of functional urban areas

    FUA name FUA code Size class Population in 2015 (GHS)

    Share of population living in the city (%)

    Albacete ES519 Medium-sized area 185 000 89

    Alcoy ES537 Small area 74 000 83

    Algeciras ES532 Metropolitan area 207 000 90

    Alicante ES021 Metropolitan area 440 000 84

    Almeria ES514 Medium-sized area 213 000 85

    Arrecife ES072 Medium-sized area 96 000 54

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Avila ES538 Small area 60 000 95

    Aviles ES039 Medium-sized area 116 000 67

    Badajoz ES017 Medium-sized area 171 000 81

    Barcelona ES002 Large metropolitan area 4 717 000 72

    Basin ES542 Small area 59 000 91

    Benidorm ES054 Medium-sized area 148 000 48

    Bilbao ES019 Metropolitan area 928 000 56

    Burgos ES515 Medium-sized area 193 000 86

    Caceres ES034 Medium-sized area 112 000 80

    Cadiz ES522 Medium-sized area 125 000 69

    Cartagena ES506 Medium-sized area 225 000 92

    Castellon de la Plana/Castello de la Plana

    ES520 Medium-sized area 228 000 74

    Ceuta ES045 Small area 72 000 100

    Chiclana de la Frontera ES540 Small area 78 000 100

    Ciudad Real ES053 Medium-sized area 101 000 72

    Cordoba ES020 Metropolitan area 344 000 91

    Coruna (A) ES026 Metropolitan area 359 000 55

    Donostia-San Sebastian ES510 Metropolitan area 307 000 55

    Eivissa ES543 Medium-sized area 124 000 38

    Elche/Elx ES505 Metropolitan area 268 000 87

    Elda ES073 Small area 56 000 100

    Ferrol ES043 Medium-sized area 130 000 43

    Gandia ES046 Medium-sized area 106 000 72

    Gijon ES023 Metropolitan area 263 000 91

    Girona ES033 Medium-sized area 179 000 57

    Granada ES501 Metropolitan area 544 000 42

    Guadalajara ES048 Medium-sized area 124 000 74

    Huelva ES521 Medium-sized area 220 000 66

    Igualada ES552 Small area 73 000 46

    Irun ES070 Small area 66 000 78

    Jaen ES527 Medium-sized area 153 000 72

    Jerez de la Frontera ES508 Medium-sized area 213 000 97

    Las Palmas ES008 Metropolitan area 608 000 75

    Leon ES523 Medium-sized area 203 000 58

    Linares ES544 Small area 60 000 95

    Linea de la Concepcion, La

    ES065 Small area 56 000 100

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Lleida ES528 Medium-sized area 184 000 75

    Logrono ES018 Medium-sized area 186 000 81

    Lorca ES545 Medium-sized area 107 000 86

    Lugo ES031 Medium-sized area 112 000 80

    Madrid ES001 Large metropolitan area 6 614 000 80

    Malaga ES006 Metropolitan area 816 000 83

    Manresa ES050 Medium-sized area 123 000 62

    Marbella ES533 Metropolitan area 291 000 69

    Melilla ES055 Small area 97 000 100

    Merida ES546 Small area 80 000 68

    Murcia ES007 Metropolitan area 618 000 72

    Ourense ES529 Medium-sized area 138 000 71

    Oviedo ES013 Metropolitan area 296 000 70

    Palencia ES041 Medium-sized area 95 000 78

    Palma de Mallorca ES010 Metropolitan area 659 000 60

    Pamplona ES014 Metropolitan area 366 000 47

    Ponferrada ES057 Small area 83 000 76

    Pontevedra ES044 Medium-sized area 122 000 62

    Puerto de Santa Maria, El

    ES037 Small area 85 000 100

    Puerto de la Cruz ES550 Small area 62 000 29

    Reus ES028 Medium-sized area 124 000 88

    Sagunto ES547 Small area 76 000 84

    Salamanca ES516 Medium-sized area 193 000 74

    Sanlucar de Barrameda ES062 Small area 63 000 100

    Santa Cruz de Tenerife ES025 Metropolitan area 482 000 71

    Santa Lucia de Tirajana ES074 Small area 67 000 100

    Santander ES015 Metropolitan area 382 000 54

    Santiago de Compostela

    ES011 Medium-sized area 188 000 48

    Saragossa ES005 Metropolitan area 748 000 87

    Seville ES004 Large metropolitan area 1 489 000 59

    Talavera de la Reina ES040 Medium-sized area 109 000 84

    Tarragona ES525 Medium-sized area 216 000 57

    Toledo ES016 Medium-sized area 152 000 56

    Torrevieja ES035 Small area 89 000 94

    Valencia ES003 Large metropolitan area 1 646 000 56

    Valladolid ES009 Metropolitan area 408 000 73

    Vigo ES022 Metropolitan area 483 000 53

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Vitoria ES012 Metropolitan area 265 000 89

    Zamora ES059 Small area 66 000 90

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Estonia

    Note: This map is for illustrative purposes and is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory covered by

    these maps.

    The population grid used to create the FUAs in Estonia is the 2011 Geostat grid. The geographic building blocks are the LAU-

    2 units.

    Table 1. List of functional urban areas

    FUA name FUA code Size class Population in 2015 (GHS)

    Share of population living in the city (%)

    Narva EE003 Small area 54 000 100

    Tallinn EE001 Metropolitan area 378 000 100

    Tartu EE002 Medium-sized area 95 000 100

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Finland

    Note: This map is for illustrative purposes and is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory covered by

    these maps.

    The population grid used to create the FUAs in Finland is the 2011 Geostat grid. The geographic building blocks are the LAU-

    2 units. Commuting data comes from the Register.

    Table 1. List of functional urban areas

    FUA name FUA code Size class Population in 2015 (GHS)

    Share of population living in the city (%)

    Helsinki FI001 Metropolitan area 1 426 000 76

    Jyvaskyla FI009 Medium-sized area 183 000 75

    Kuopio FI008 Medium-sized area 164 000 72

    Lahti FI007 Medium-sized area 193 000 62

    Oulu FI004 Metropolitan area 250 000 77

    Tampere FI002 Metropolitan area 435 000 52

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Turku FI003 Metropolitan area 348 000 53

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    France

    Note: This map is for illustrative purposes and is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory covered by

    these maps.

    The population grid used to create the FUAs in France is the 2011 Geostat grid. The geographic building blocks are the LAU-

    2 units. Commuting data comes from the 2011 Census.

    Table 1. List of functional urban areas

    FUA name FUA code Size class Population in 2015 (GHS)

    Share of population living in the city (%)

    Aix-en-Provence FR202 Metropolitan area 341 000 42

    Ajaccio FR027 Medium-sized area 94 000 78

    Albi FR096 Medium-sized area 138 000 60

    Amiens FR014 Metropolitan area 337 000 39

    Angers FR036 Metropolitan area 412 000 39

    Angouleme FR056 Medium-sized area 203 000 52

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Annecy FR048 Metropolitan area 277 000 41

    Annemasse FR047 Small area 80 000 70

    Arras FR064 Medium-sized area 159 000 42

    Avignon FR039 Metropolitan area 328 000 32

    Bayonne FR046 Metropolitan area 255 000 44

    Beauvais FR082 Medium-sized area 147 000 53

    Belfort FR076 Medium-sized area 143 000 44

    Besancon FR025 Metropolitan area 280 000 41

    Beziers FR063 Medium-sized area 184 000 39

    Bordeaux FR007 Metropolitan area 1 188 000 51

    Boulogne-sur-Mer FR057 Medium-sized area 153 000 46

    Bourges FR065 Medium-sized area 171 000 37

    Brest FR037 Metropolitan area 342 000 36

    Brive-la-Gaillarde FR093 Medium-sized area 131 000 62

    Caen FR023 Metropolitan area 431 000 33

    Calais FR062 Medium-sized area 141 000 49

    Cannes FR519 Medium-sized area 177 000 41

    Cayenne FR521 Medium-sized area 126 000 44

    Chalon-sur-Saone FR059 Medium-sized area 164 000 64

    Chalons-en-Champagne

    FR104 Small area 88 000 71

    Chambery FR058 Medium-sized area 195 000 43

    Charleville-Mezieres FR505 Medium-sized area 128 000 49

    Chartres FR060 Medium-sized area 164 000 43

    Chateauroux FR090 Medium-sized area 119 000 61

    Cherbourg FR069 Medium-sized area 147 000 50

    Clermont-Ferrand FR022 Metropolitan area 490 000 37

    Colmar FR506 Medium-sized area 199 000 34

    Compiegne FR074 Medium-sized area 153 000 46

    Creil FR084 Medium-sized area 137 000 49

    Dijon FR020 Metropolitan area 405 000 46

    Douai FR209 Medium-sized area 201 000 43

    Dunkerque FR042 Metropolitan area 248 000 51

    Evreux FR086 Medium-sized area 142 000 58

    Fort-de-France FR030 Metropolitan area 315 000 30

    Frejus FR099 Medium-sized area 119 000 73

    Grenoble FR026 Metropolitan area 661 000 44

    Henin - Carvin FR208 Medium-sized area 120 000 100

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    La Rochelle FR053 Medium-sized area 216 000 36

    Le Havre FR012 Metropolitan area 312 000 58

    Le Mans FR038 Metropolitan area 370 000 38

    Lens - Lievin FR207 Metropolitan area 297 000 58

    Les Abymes FR520 Metropolitan area 268 000 25

    Lille FR009 Metropolitan area 1 467 000 60

    Limoges FR024 Metropolitan area 335 000 45

    Lorient FR049 Medium-sized area 205 000 33

    Lyon FR003 Large metropolitan area 2 017 000 51

    Mamoudzou FR522 Small area 55 000 100

    Marseille FR203 Metropolitan area 1 246 000 70

    Martigues FR324 Small area 79 000 76

    Metz FR017 Metropolitan area 367 000 43

    Montbeliard FR050 Medium-sized area 192 000 59

    Montpellier FR010 Metropolitan area 684 000 41

    Mulhouse FR040 Metropolitan area 401 000 44

    Nancy FR016 Metropolitan area 505 000 40

    Nantes FR008 Metropolitan area 924 000 44

    Nice FR205 Metropolitan area 1 005 000 64

    Nimes FR044 Metropolitan area 335 000 43

    Niort FR061 Medium-sized area 179 000 58

    Orleans FR019 Metropolitan area 430 000 45

    Paris FR001 Large metropolitan area 12 794 000 78

    Pau FR045 Metropolitan area 287 000 38

    Perpignan FR043 Metropolitan area 403 000 33

    Poitiers FR021 Metropolitan area 275 000 35

    Quimper FR067 Medium-sized area 179 000 48

    Reims FR018 Metropolitan area 343 000 56

    Rennes FR013 Metropolitan area 672 000 29

    Roanne FR077 Medium-sized area 129 000 35

    Rouen FR215 Metropolitan area 684 000 44

    Saint Denis FR028 Metropolitan area 302 000 45

    Saint-Brieuc FR066 Medium-sized area 183 000 34

    Saint-Etienne FR011 Metropolitan area 476 000 37

    Saint-Nazaire FR052 Medium-sized area 165 000 36

    Saint-Quentin FR079 Medium-sized area 120 000 38

    Strasbourg FR006 Metropolitan area 805 000 48

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Tarbes FR073 Medium-sized area 137 000 54

    Toulon FR032 Metropolitan area 530 000 56

    Toulouse FR004 Metropolitan area 1 391 000 42

    Tours FR035 Metropolitan area 508 000 46

    Troyes FR051 Medium-sized area 208 000 49

    Valence FR214 Metropolitan area 249 000 37

    Valenciennes FR034 Metropolitan area 323 000 32

    Vannes FR068 Medium-sized area 200 000 69

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    United Kingdom

    Note: This map is for illustrative purposes and is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory covered by

    these maps.

    The population grid used to create the FUAs in the United Kingdom is the 2011 Geostat grid. The geographic building blocks

    are the LAU-1 units. Commuting data comes from the 2011 Census.

    Table 1. List of functional urban areas

    FUA name FUA code Size class Population in 2015 (GHS)

    Share of population living in the city (%)

    Aberdeen UK016 Metropolitan area 479 000 47

    Ashford UK041 Medium-sized area 124 000 100

    Basingstoke and Deane UK548 Medium-sized area 173 000 100

    Bath and North East Somerset

    UK031 Medium-sized area 178 000 100

    Bedford UK549 Medium-sized area 165 000 100

    Belfast UK012 Metropolitan area 770 000 43

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Blackburn with Darwen UK557 Metropolitan area 289 000 80

    Blackpool UK553 Metropolitan area 318 000 44

    Bournemouth UK539 Metropolitan area 509 000 65

    Bracknell Forest UK573 Medium-sized area 117 000 100

    Brighton and Hove UK515 Metropolitan area 427 000 62

    Bristol UK011 Metropolitan area 918 000 47

    Burnley UK050 Medium-sized area 175 000 49

    Cambridge UK017 Metropolitan area 377 000 33

    Cannock Chase UK054 Small area 97 000 100

    Cardiff UK009 Metropolitan area 895 000 40

    Carlisle UK575 Medium-sized area 110 000 100

    Cheltenham UK571 Medium-sized area 204 000 55

    Cheshire West and Chester

    UK568 Metropolitan area 484 000 68

    Chesterfield UK047 Medium-sized area 104 000 100

    Colchester UK546 Metropolitan area 308 000 58

    Corby UK582 Small area 64 000 100

    Coventry UK025 Metropolitan area 694 000 100

    Crawley UK576 Medium-sized area 106 000 100

    Dacorum UK556 Medium-sized area 146 000 100

    Darlington UK044 Medium-sized area 106 000 100

    Derby UK518 Metropolitan area 483 000 53

    Derry & Strabane Local Government District

    UK586 Medium-sized area 151 000 100

    Doncaster UK506 Metropolitan area 310 000 100

    Dundee City UK550 Metropolitan area 258 000 56

    East Staffordshire UK043 Medium-sized area 115 000 100

    Eastbourne UK055 Medium-sized area 99 000 100

    Edinburgh UK007 Metropolitan area 845 000 57

    Exeter UK018 Metropolitan area 454 000 26

    Falkirk UK551 Medium-sized area 158 000 100

    Fareham UK036 Medium-sized area 113 000 100

    Glasgow UK004 Large metropolitan area 1 784 000 66

    Gloucester UK572 Medium-sized area 119 000 100

    Gravesham UK020 Medium-sized area 105 000 100

    Great Yarmouth UK051 Medium-sized area 97 000 100

    Guildford UK033 Metropolitan area 263 000 52

    Halton UK062 Medium-sized area 125 000 100

    Hartlepool UK053 Small area 89 000 100

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Hastings UK056 Medium-sized area 177 000 49

    Ipswich UK569 Metropolitan area 351 000 39

    Kettering UK583 Medium-sized area 98 000 100

    Kingston upon Hull UK026 Metropolitan area 593 000 43

    Leeds UK003 Large metropolitan area 2 577 000 80

    Leicester UK014 Metropolitan area 866 000 39

    Lincoln UK019 Metropolitan area 303 000 30

    Liverpool UK006 Large metropolitan area 1 487 000 83

    London UK001 Large metropolitan area 11 954 000 82

    Luton UK532 Medium-sized area 195 000 100

    Maidstone UK554 Medium-sized area 162 000 100

    Manchester UK008 Large metropolitan area 3 283 000 84

    Mansfield UK046 Medium-sized area 106 000 100

    Medway UK513 Metropolitan area 258 000 100

    Middlesbrough UK559 Metropolitan area 554 000 76

    Milton Keynes UK525 Metropolitan area 263 000 100

    Newcastle upon Tyne UK013 Metropolitan area 1 142 000 72

    Newport UK558 Medium-sized area 238 000 62

    North East Lincolnshire UK543 Medium-sized area 156 000 100

    Northampton UK528 Metropolitan area 462 000 46

    Norwich UK566 Metropolitan area 394 000 32

    Nottingham UK029 Metropolitan area 892 000 35

    Nuneaton and Bedworth UK035 Medium-sized area 126 000 100

    Oxford UK560 Metropolitan area 525 000 28

    Peterborough UK545 Medium-sized area 198 000 100

    Plymouth UK516 Metropolitan area 393 000 64

    Portsmouth UK023 Metropolitan area 511 000 55

    Preston UK562 Metropolitan area 255 000 56

    Reading UK552 Metropolitan area 319 000 49

    Redditch UK059 Small area 79 000 100

    Rushmoor UK580 Small area 91 000 100

    Sheffield UK010 Metropolitan area 1 160 000 91

    Slough UK567 Medium-sized area 141 000 100

    Southampton UK520 Metropolitan area 654 000 54

    Stevenage UK021 Small area 81 000 100

    Stoke-on-Trent UK027 Metropolitan area 471 000 79

    Sunderland UK510 Metropolitan area 268 000 100

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Swansea UK517 Metropolitan area 386 000 62

    Swindon UK535 Medium-sized area 221 000 100

    Telford and Wrekin UK542 Medium-sized area 169 000 100

    Thanet UK034 Medium-sized area 117 000 100

    Torbay UK561 Medium-sized area 126 000 100

    Tunbridge Wells UK040 Medium-sized area 116 000 100

    Warrington UK531 Medium-sized area 205 000 100

    Waveney UK038 Medium-sized area 114 000 100

    West Midlands urban area

    UK002 Large metropolitan area 3 024 000 86

    Wirral UK030 Metropolitan area 313 000 100

    Woking UK052 Medium-sized area 100 000 100

    Worcester UK024 Medium-sized area 175 000 54

    Worthing UK045 Medium-sized area 101 000 100

    Wrexham UK022 Medium-sized area 137 000 100

    Wycombe UK540 Medium-sized area 175 000 100

    York UK533 Medium-sized area 204 000 100

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Greece

    Note: This map is for illustrative purposes and is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory covered by

    these maps.

    The population grid used to create the FUAs in Greece is the 2011 Geostat grid. The geographic building blocks are the LAU-

    2 units. Commuting data comes from the 2011 Census.

    Table 1. List of functional urban areas

    FUA name FUA code Size class Population in 2015 (GHS)

    Share of population living in the city (%)

    Athens EL001 Large metropolitan area 3 615 000 100

    Chania EL010 Small area 94 000 67

    Ioannina EL007 Medium-sized area 150 000 46

    Irakleio EL004 Medium-sized area 221 000 62

    Kalamata EL009 Small area 74 000 71

    Katerini EL012 Small area 88 000 66

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Kavala EL008 Small area 65 000 68

    Larisa EL005 Medium-sized area 203 000 71

    Patras EL003 Medium-sized area 208 000 71

    Serres EL013 Small area 89 000 64

    Thessaloniki EL002 Metropolitan area 1 041 000 100

    Trikala EL014 Medium-sized area 111 000 47

    Volos EL006 Medium-sized area 143 000 56

    Xanthi EL011 Small area 91 000 66

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Hungary

    Note: This map is for illustrative purposes and is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory covered by

    these maps.

    The population grid used to create the FUAs in Hungary is the 2011 Geostat grid. The geographic building blocks are the

    LAU-2 units. Commuting data comes from the 2011 Census.

    Table 1. List of functional urban areas

    FUA name FUA code Size class Population in 2015 (GHS)

    Share of population living in the city (%)

    Bekescsaba HU014 Medium-sized area 107 000 50

    Budapest HU001 Large metropolitan area 2 969 000 60

    Debrecen HU005 Metropolitan area 361 000 65

    Dunaujvaros HU017 Small area 94 000 54

    Eger HU016 Small area 104 000 54

    Gyor HU007 Metropolitan area 241 000 53

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Kaposvar HU015 Medium-sized area 107 000 57

    Kecskemet HU008 Medium-sized area 183 000 60

    Miskolc HU002 Metropolitan area 297 000 55

    Nyiregyhaza HU003 Medium-sized area 246 000 51

    Pecs HU004 Medium-sized area 255 000 61

    Sopron HU019 Medium-sized area 102 000 62

    Szeged HU006 Medium-sized area 243 000 68

    Szekesfehervar HU009 Metropolitan area 270 000 36

    Szolnok HU011 Medium-sized area 154 000 45

    Szombathely HU010 Medium-sized area 145 000 52

    Tatabanya HU012 Medium-sized area 127 000 48

    Veszprem HU013 Medium-sized area 127 000 45

    Zalaegerszeg HU018 Medium-sized area 103 000 53

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Ireland

    Note: This map is for illustrative purposes and is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory covered by

    these maps.

    The population grid used to create the FUAs in Ireland is the 2011 Geostat grid. The geographic building blocks are the LAU-

    2 units.

    Table 1. List of functional urban areas

    FUA name FUA code Size class Population in 2015 (GHS)

    Share of population living in the city (%)

    Cork IE002 Metropolitan area 408 000 28

    Dublin IE001 Large metropolitan area 1 828 000 28

    Galway IE004 Medium-sized area 182 000 40

    Limerick IE003 Medium-sized area 163 000 29

    Waterford IE005 Medium-sized area 96 000 47

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Iceland

    Note: This map is for illustrative purposes and is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory covered by

    these maps.

    The population grid used to create the FUAs in Iceland is the 2011 Geostat grid. The geographic building blocks are the LAU-

    2 units.

    Table 1. List of functional urban areas

    FUA name FUA code Size class Population in 2015 (GHS)

    Share of population living in the city (%)

    Reykjavik IS001 Small area 205 000 99

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Italy

    Note: This map is for illustrative purposes and is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory covered by

    these maps.

    The population grid used to create the FUAs in Italy is the 2011 Geostat grid. The geographic building blocks are the LAU-2

    units. Commuting data comes from the 2011 Census.

    Table 1. List of functional urban areas

    FUA name FUA code Size class Population in 2015 (GHS)

    Share of population living in the city (%)

    Acireale IT056 Small area 60 000 86

    Alexandria IT518 Medium-sized area 131 000 69

    Altamura IT061 Small area 71 000 100

    Ancona IT017 Medium-sized area 210 000 43

    Andria IT524 Small area 99 000 100

    Arezzo IT519 Medium-sized area 157 000 64

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Asti IT045 Medium-sized area 114 000 66

    Avellino IT057 Medium-sized area 153 000 36

    Bari IT008 Metropolitan area 701 000 58

    Barletta IT038 Small area 92 000 100

    Battipaglia IT064 Small area 60 000 83

    Bergamo IT511 Metropolitan area 309 000 37

    Bisceglie IT065 Small area 49 000 100

    Bologna IT009 Metropolitan area 760 000 48

    Bolzano IT034 Medium-sized area 195 000 53

    Brescia IT029 Metropolitan area 482 000 39

    Cagliari IT027 Metropolitan area 462 000 29

    Campobasso IT020 Small area 100 000 46

    Carpi IT066 Small area 87 000 80

    Caserta IT021 Medium-sized area 125 000 64

    Catania IT010 Metropolitan area 608 000 45

    Catanzaro IT024 Medium-sized area 148 000 54

    Cerignola IT067 Small area 56 000 100

    Como IT040 Medium-sized area 164 000 47

    Cosenza IT048 Medium-sized area 189 000 34

    Cremona IT013 Medium-sized area 128 000 52

    Ferrara IT507 Medium-sized area 206 000 62

    Florence IT007 Metropolitan area 778 000 46

    Foggia IT031 Medium-sized area 166 000 86

    Forli IT512 Medium-sized area 173 000 69

    Gallarate IT068 Medium-sized area 102 000 48

    Gela IT069 Small area 76 000 95

    Genoa IT006 Metropolitan area 646 000 81

    Grosseto IT520 Small area 95 000 83

    L'Aquila IT526 Small area 94 000 70

    La Spezia IT036 Medium-sized area 186 000 44

    Latina IT513 Medium-sized area 182 000 65

    Lecce IT037 Medium-sized area 229 000 38

    Lecco IT060 Medium-sized area 138 000 33

    Livorno IT504 Medium-sized area 170 000 83

    Massa IT047 Small area 76 000 89

    Matera IT054 Small area 76 000 78

    Messina IT501 Metropolitan area 237 000 86

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Milan IT002 Large metropolitan area 4 769 000 31

    Modena IT030 Metropolitan area 367 000 48

    Naples IT003 Large metropolitan area 3 288 000 31

    Novara IT516 Medium-sized area 160 000 63

    Padua IT028 Metropolitan area 533 000 38

    Palermo IT005 Metropolitan area 959 000 70

    Parma IT503 Metropolitan area 330 000 54

    Pavia IT046 Medium-sized area 134 000 49

    Perugia IT016 Metropolitan area 287 000 57

    Pesaro IT039 Medium-sized area 129 000 73

    Pescara IT019 Medium-sized area 219 000 49

    Piacenza IT033 Medium-sized area 203 000 50

    Pisa IT041 Medium-sized area 186 000 45

    Pordenone IT058 Medium-sized area 143 000 35

    Potenza IT023 Medium-sized area 129 000 50

    Prato IT502 Metropolitan area 275 000 69

    Ragusa IT523 Small area 79 000 84

    Ravenna IT506 Medium-sized area 178 000 86

    Reggio di Calabria IT025 Medium-sized area 197 000 84

    Reggio nell'Emilia IT505 Metropolitan area 284 000 60

    Rimini IT508 Metropolitan area 246 000 57

    Rome IT001 Large metropolitan area 4 131 000 64

    Salerno IT032 Metropolitan area 246 000 51

    Sassari IT026 Medium-sized area 209 000 58

    Sassuolo IT073 Small area 94 000 38

    Savona IT052 Medium-sized area 91 000 56

    Siracusa IT509 Medium-sized area 169 000 63

    Taranto IT022 Metropolitan area 398 000 44

    Terni IT515 Medium-sized area 173 000 63

    Toast IT521 Medium-sized area 152 000 53

    Trani IT525 Small area 49 000 100

    Trapani IT522 Medium-sized area 115 000 56

    Trent IT014 Medium-sized area 236 000 50

    Treviso IT042 Medium-sized area 196 000 40

    Trieste IT015 Medium-sized area 207 000 86

    Turin IT004 Large metropolitan area 1 740 000 48

    Udine IT035 Medium-sized area 237 000 41

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Varese IT043 Medium-sized area 191 000 40

    Venice IT011 Metropolitan area 514 000 45

    Verona IT012 Metropolitan area 506 000 49

    Vicenza IT514 Medium-sized area 236 000 47

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Japan

    Note: This map is for illustrative purposes and is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory covered by

    these maps.

    The population grid used to create the FUAs in Japan is the 2015 Global Human Settlement (GHS) grid. The geographic

    building blocks are the cities (Shi), towns (Machi) and villages (Mura). Commuting data comes from the 2015 Census.

    Table 1. List of functional urban areas

    FUA name FUA code Size class Population in 2015 (GHS)

    Share of population living in the city (%)

    Akita JPN43 Metropolitan area 377 000 79

    Aomori JPN51 Metropolitan area 289 000 94

    Asahikawa JPN44 Metropolitan area 383 000 88

    Ashikaga JPN57 Medium-sized area 222 000 84

    Fuji JPN46 Metropolitan area 382 000 98

    Fujieda JPN38 Metropolitan area 448 000 67

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Fukui JPN32 Metropolitan area 535 000 47

    Fukuoka JPN04 Large metropolitan area 2 566 000 92

    Fukushima JPN39 Metropolitan area 437 000 64

    Hachinohe JPN49 Metropolitan area 300 000 71

    Hakodate JPN48 Metropolitan area 322 000 77

    Hamamatsu JPN14 Metropolitan area 945 000 68

    Himeji JPN20 Metropolitan area 685 000 78

    Hiroshima JPN08 Metropolitan area 1 391 000 96

    Hitachi JPN50 Metropolitan area 311 000 59

    Isesaki JPN47 Metropolitan area 374 000 100

    Kagoshima JPN19 Metropolitan area 670 000 83

    Kanazawa JPN17 Metropolitan area 723 000 78

    Kitakyushu JPN09 Metropolitan area 1 279 000 73

    Kochi JPN35 Metropolitan area 484 000 65

    Kofu JPN27 Metropolitan area 578 000 52

    Koriyama JPN34 Metropolitan area 507 000 65

    Kumamoto JPN11 Metropolitan area 1 124 000 74

    Kurume JPN42 Metropolitan area 408 000 72

    Kusatsu JPN45 Metropolitan area 384 000 72

    Kushiro JPN60 Medium-sized area 196 000 85

    Marugame JPN59 Medium-sized area 205 000 58

    Matsumoto JPN40 Metropolitan area 416 000 57

    Matsuyama JPN25 Metropolitan area 598 000 97

    Mito JPN21 Metropolitan area 699 000 60

    Miyazaki JPN36 Metropolitan area 478 000 80

    Morioka JPN37 Metropolitan area 449 000 64

    Nagano JPN29 Metropolitan area 566 000 65

    Nagasaki JPN24 Metropolitan area 575 000 77

    Nagoya JPN03 Large metropolitan area 8 532 000 88

    Naha JPN10 Metropolitan area 1 133 000 72

    Niigata JPN15 Metropolitan area 772 000 45

    Numazu JPN31 Metropolitan area 541 000 85

    Obihiro JPN53 Metropolitan area 253 000 64

    Oita JPN18 Metropolitan area 704 000 81

    Okayama JPN07 Large metropolitan area 1 487 000 78

    Omuta JPN58 Medium-sized area 220 000 54

    Osaka JPN02 Large metropolitan area 16 694 000 93

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Sapporo JPN05 Large metropolitan area 2 099 000 93

    Sendai JPN06 Metropolitan area 1 480 000 81

    Shimonoseki JPN52 Metropolitan area 251 000 100

    Shizuoka JPN22 Metropolitan area 676 000 100

    Shunan JPN54 Metropolitan area 235 000 79

    Takamatsu JPN28 Metropolitan area 547 000 72

    Takasaki JPN13 Metropolitan area 1 053 000 76

    Tokushima JPN30 Metropolitan area 554 000 54

    Tokyo JPN01 Large metropolitan area 35 714 000 94

    Tomakomai JPN61 Medium-sized area 163 000 100

    Toyama JPN26 Metropolitan area 572 000 71

    Toyohashi JPN23 Metropolitan area 669 000 83

    Ube JPN55 Medium-sized area 210 000 72

    Utsunomiya JPN16 Metropolitan area 873 000 57

    Wakayama JPN33 Metropolitan area 518 000 77

    Yamagata JPN41 Metropolitan area 406 000 59

    Yokkaichi JPN12 Metropolitan area 1 035 000 76

    Yonago JPN56 Medium-sized area 220 000 64

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Korea

    Note: This map is for illustrative purposes and is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory covered by

    these maps.

    The population grid used to create the FUAs in Korea is the 2015 Global Human Settlement (GHS) grid. The geographic

    building blocks are the cities (Si), counties (Gun) and districts (Gu). Commuting data comes from the 2015 Census.

    Table 1. List of functional urban areas

    FUA name FUA code Size class Population in 2015 (GHS)

    Share of population living in the city (%)

    Chuncheon KOR18 Metropolitan area 282 000 100

    Dalseong KOR03 Large metropolitan area 2 213 000 100

    Deokjin KOR09 Metropolitan area 754 000 87

    Gangneung KOR21 Medium-sized area 197 000 100

    Gimhae KOR02 Large metropolitan area 4 313 000 92

    Gumi KOR13 Metropolitan area 483 000 76

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Gunsan KOR19 Metropolitan area 257 000 100

    Gwangsan KOR04 Large metropolitan area 1 617 000 94

    Gyeongsan KOR11 Metropolitan area 582 000 100

    Heungdeok KOR08 Metropolitan area 856 000 96

    Iksan KOR17 Metropolitan area 298 000 100

    Jeju KOR14 Metropolitan area 409 000 100

    Jinju KOR15 Metropolitan area 348 000 100

    Naju KOR22 Medium-sized area 134 000 100

    Pohan KOR12 Metropolitan area 471 000 100

    Sebuk KOR10 Metropolitan area 637 000 100

    Seo KOR05 Metropolitan area 1 598 000 100

    Seongsan KOR06 Metropolitan area 1 063 000 79

    Seoul KOR01 Large metropolitan area 23 827 000 92

    Suncheon KOR20 Metropolitan area 239 000 100

    Ulsan KOR07 Metropolitan area 903 000 100

    Wonju KOR16 Metropolitan area 345 000 100

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Lithuania

    Note: This map is for illustrative purposes and is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory covered by

    these maps.

    The population grid used to create the FUAs in Lithuania is the 2011 Geostat grid. The geographic building blocks are the

    LAU-1 units.

    Table 1. List of functional urban areas

    FUA name FUA code Size class Population in 2015 (GHS)

    Share of population living in the city (%)

    Alytus LT004 Small area 65 000 100

    Kaunas LT002 Metropolitan area 303 000 100

    Klaipeda LT501 Medium-sized area 137 000 100

    Panevezys LT003 Medium-sized area 101 000 100

    Siauliai LT502 Small area 98 000 100

    Vilnius LT001 Metropolitan area 549 000 100

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Luxembourg

    Note: This map is for illustrative purposes and is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory covered by

    these maps.

    The population grid used to create the FUAs in Luxembourg is the 2011 Geostat grid. The geographic building blocks are the

    LAU-2 units.

    Table 1. List of functional urban areas

    FUA name FUA code Size class Population in 2015 (GHS)

    Share of population living in the city (%)

    Luxembourg LU001 Metropolitan area 565 000 19

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Latvia

    Note: This map is for illustrative purposes and is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory covered by

    these maps.

    The population grid used to create the FUAs in Latvia is the 2011 Geostat grid. The geographic building blocks are the LAU-

    2 units. Commuting data comes from the 2011 Census.

    Table 1. List of functional urban areas

    FUA name FUA code Size class Population in 2015 (GHS)

    Share of population living in the city (%)

    Daugavpils LV501 Medium-sized area 122 000 79

    Jelgava LV003 Small area 89 000 63

    Liepaja LV002 Small area 97 000 74

    Riga LV001 Metropolitan area 901 000 69

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Mexico

    Note: This map is for illustrative purposes and is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory covered by

    these maps.

    The population grid used to create the FUAs in Mexico is the 2015 Global Human Settlement (GHS) grid. The geographic

    building blocks are the Municipios. Commuting data comes from the 2015 Mexican Inter-Census Survey.

    Table 1. List of functional urban areas

    FUA name FUA code Size class Population in 2015 (GHS)

    Share of population living in the city (%)

    Acapulco de Juarez MEX22 Metropolitan area 879 000 100

    Acuna MEX86 Medium-sized area 153 000 100

    Aguascalientes MEX21 Metropolitan area 902 000 100

    Ahome MEX34 Metropolitan area 568 000 81

    Apatzingan MEX89 Medium-sized area 135 000 100

    Apizaco MEX70 Medium-sized area 204 000 57

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Benito Juarez MEX28 Metropolitan area 783 000 100

    Cajeme MEX41 Metropolitan area 460 000 100

    Campeche MEX58 Metropolitan area 284 000 100

    Carmen MEX64 Metropolitan area 242 000 100

    Celaya MEX29 Metropolitan area 696 000 78

    Chiautla MEX92 Small area 66 000 100

    Chihuahua MEX18 Metropolitan area 912 000 100

    Chilpancingo de los Bravo

    MEX53 Metropolitan area 348 000 81

    Ciudad Valles MEX75 Medium-sized area 184 000 100

    Coatzacoalcos MEX44 Metropolitan area 371 000 91

    Colima MEX56 Metropolitan area 315 000 100

    Comitan de Dominguez MEX82 Medium-sized area 169 000 100

    Cordoba MEX48 Metropolitan area 358 000 80

    Cuauhtemoc MEX77 Medium-sized area 182 000 100

    Cuautla MEX52 Metropolitan area 344 000 57

    Cuernavaca MEX14 Metropolitan area 1 035 000 87

    Culiacan MEX16 Metropolitan area 954 000 100

    Delicias MEX83 Medium-sized area 154 000 100

    Durango MEX30 Metropolitan area 661 000 100

    Ensenada MEX36 Metropolitan area 536 000 100

    Fresnillo MEX67 Medium-sized area 239 000 100

    Guadalajara MEX02 Large metropolitan area 5 265 000 81

    Guadalupe MEX43 Metropolitan area 437 000 80

    Hermosillo MEX20 Metropolitan area 899 000 100

    Hidalgo del Parral MEX91 Medium-sized area 114 000 100

    Iguala de la Independencia

    MEX85 Medium-sized area 158 000 100

    Irapuato MEX33 Metropolitan area 634 000 98

    Juarez MEX10 Metropolitan area 1 386 000 100

    La Paz MEX57 Metropolitan area 295 000 100

    Lagos de Moreno MEX80 Medium-sized area 175 000 100

    Lazaro Cardenas MEX74 Medium-sized area 200 000 100

    Leon MEX07 Large metropolitan area 1 658 000 100

    Los Cabos MEX55 Metropolitan area 352 000 100

    Matamoros MEX35 Metropolitan area 532 000 100

    Mazatlan MEX40 Metropolitan area 480 000 100

    Merida MEX09 Large metropolitan area 1 484 000 69

    Mexicali MEX13 Metropolitan area 1 044 000 100

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Mexico City MEX01 Large metropolitan area 20 554 000 98

    Minatitlan MEX51 Metropolitan area 352 000 86

    Monclova MEX54 Metropolitan area 323 000 100

    Monterrey MEX03 Large metropolitan area 5 357 000 96

    Morelia MEX17 Metropolitan area 972 000 82

    Navojoa MEX78 Medium-sized area 176 000 100

    Nogales MEX65 Medium-sized area 248 000 100

    Nuevo Laredo MEX42 Metropolitan area 426 000 100

    Oaxaca de Juarez MEX24 Metropolitan area 876 000 64

    Orizaba MEX39 Metropolitan area 512 000 57

    Othon P. Blanco MEX66 Metropolitan area 239 000 100

    Pachuca de Soto MEX32 Metropolitan area 703 000 73

    Piedras Negras MEX81 Medium-sized area 168 000 100

    Poza Rica de Hidalgo MEX37 Metropolitan area 539 000 37

    Puebla MEX04 Large metropolitan area 2 705 000 89

    Puerto Vallarta MEX59 Metropolitan area 303 000 100

    Queretaro MEX08 Large metropolitan area 1 588 000 69

    Reynosa MEX25 Metropolitan area 855 000 84

    Salamanca MEX60 Metropolitan area 298 000 100

    Saltillo MEX27 Metropolitan area 827 000 100

    San Cristobal de las Casas

    MEX68 Medium-sized area 212 000 100

    San Francisco del Rincon

    MEX72 Medium-sized area 216 000 100

    San Juan del Rio MEX61 Metropolitan area 290 000 100

    San Luis Potosi MEX11 Metropolitan area 1 368 000 85

    San Luis Rio Colorado MEX71 Medium-sized area 207 000 100

    San Martin Texmelucan MEX73 Medium-sized area 207 000 78

    Solidaridad MEX69 Medium-sized area 222 000 100

    Tampico MEX23 Metropolitan area 850 000 100

    Tapachula MEX45 Metropolitan area 369 000 100

    Tehuacan MEX50 Metropolitan area 345 000 86

    Tepic MEX38 Metropolitan area 500 000 88

    Teziutlan MEX88 Medium-sized area 135 000 100

    Tianguistenco MEX76 Medium-sized area 185 000 97

    Tijuana MEX06 Large metropolitan area 1 753 000 100

    Tlaxcala MEX47 Metropolitan area 357 000 73

    Toluca MEX05 Large metropolitan area 2 389 000 64

    Torreon MEX12 Metropolitan area 1 248 000 100

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Tulancingo de Bravo MEX63 Metropolitan area 290 000 61

    Tuxpan MEX84 Medium-sized area 156 000 100

    Tuxtla Gutierrez MEX31 Metropolitan area 625 000 100

    Uriangato MEX87 Medium-sized area 153 000 79

    Uruapan MEX49 Metropolitan area 366 000 100

    Veracruz MEX19 Metropolitan area 915 000 82

    Victoria MEX46 Metropolitan area 363 000 100

    Villahermosa MEX15 Metropolitan area 1 050 000 72

    Xalapa MEX26 Metropolitan area 846 000 67

    Zamora MEX62 Metropolitan area 279 000 75

    Zapotlan el Grande MEX90 Medium-sized area 124 000 87

    Zitacuaro MEX79 Medium-sized area 181 000 100

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Netherlands

    Note: This map is for illustrative purposes and is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory covered by

    these maps.

    The population grid used to create the FUAs in the Netherlands is the 2011 Geostat grid. The geographic building blocks are

    the LAU-2 units. Commuting data comes from the 2011 Census.

    Table 1. List of functional urban areas

    FUA name FUA code Size class Population in 2015 (GHS)

    Share of population living in the city (%)

    Alkmaar NL514 Metropolitan area 290 000 62

    Almelo NL519 Medium-sized area 153 000 47

    Alphen aan den Rijn NL026 Medium-sized area 107 000 100

    Amersfoort NL504 Medium-sized area 177 000 82

    Amsterdam NL002 Large metropolitan area 2 750 000 73

    Apeldoorn NL014 Medium-sized area 235 000 66

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Arnhem NL009 Metropolitan area 420 000 39

    Assen NL522 Medium-sized area 130 000 54

    Bergen op Zoom NL028 Medium-sized area 113 000 58

    Breda NL012 Metropolitan area 367 000 48

    Deventer NL513 Medium-sized area 119 000 84

    Ede NL512 Medium-sized area 153 000 100

    Eindhoven NL005 Metropolitan area 734 000 48

    Enschede NL008 Metropolitan area 402 000 59

    Gouda NL030 Small area 63 000 100

    Greater Soest NL529 Small area 68 000 100

    Groningen NL007 Metropolitan area 471 000 41

    Heerlen NL010 Metropolitan area 287 000 69

    Leeuwarden NL015 Medium-sized area 209 000 57

    Leiden NL507 Metropolitan area 338 000 73

    Lelystad NL520 Medium-sized area 122 000 65

    Maastricht NL505 Medium-sized area 179 000 68

    Middelburg NL032 Medium-sized area 113 000 81

    Nijmegen NL013 Metropolitan area 323 000 51

    Oss NL521 Medium-sized area 133 000 67

    Roosendaal NL020 Medium-sized area 132 000 60

    Rotterdam NL003 Large metropolitan area 1 811 000 73

    Sittard-Geleen NL016 Medium-sized area 169 000 69

    The Hague NL001 Metropolitan area 1 045 000 78

    Tilburg NL006 Metropolitan area 309 000 67

    Utrecht NL004 Metropolitan area 877 000 49

    Veenendaal NL524 Small area 83 000 71

    Venlo NL515 Medium-sized area 197 000 49

    Zwolle NL511 Metropolitan area 353 000 35

    s-Hertogenbosch NL503 Metropolitan area 273 000 56

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Norway

    Note: This map is for illustrative purposes and is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory covered by

    these maps.

    The population grid used to create the FUAs in Norway is the 2011 Geostat grid. The geographic building blocks are the LAU-

    2 units.

    Table 1. List of functional urban areas

    FUA name FUA code Size class Population in 2015 (GHS)

    Share of population living in the city (%)

    Bergen NO002 Metropolitan area 380 000 68

    Kristiansand NO005 Medium-sized area 149 000 54

    Oslo NO001 Metropolitan area 1 305 000 48

    Stavanger NO004 Metropolitan area 310 000 42

    Tromso NO006 Small area 47 000 96

    Trondheim NO003 Metropolitan area 271 000 67

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Poland

    Note: This map is for illustrative purposes and is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory covered by

    these maps.

    The population grid used to create the FUAs in Poland is the 2011 Geostat grid. The geographic building blocks are the LAU-

    2 units.

    Table 1. List of functional urban areas

    FUA name FUA code Size class Population in 2015 (GHS)

    Share of population living in the city (%)

    Bialystok PL011 Metropolitan area 424 000 70

    Bielsko-Biala PL506 Metropolitan area 361 000 48

    Bydgoszcz PL008 Metropolitan area 504 000 70

    Chelm PL042 Small area 88 000 70

    Cracow PL003 Metropolitan area 1 388 000 54

    Czestochowa PL024 Metropolitan area 402 000 57

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Elblag PL512 Medium-sized area 158 000 10

    Elk PL052 Small area 72 000 84

    Gdansk PL006 Metropolitan area 1 127 000 62

    Glogow PL044 Medium-sized area 104 000 63

    Gniezno PL037 Medium-sized area 106 000 64

    Gorzow Wielkopolski PL017 Medium-sized area 162 000 75

    Grudziadz PL517 Medium-sized area 127 000 14

    Inowroclaw PL035 Small area 87 000 84

    Jastrzebie Zdroj PL030 Medium-sized area 191 000 77

    Jelenia Gora PL019 Medium-sized area 138 000 60

    Kalisz PL027 Medium-sized area 212 000 48

    Katowice PL010 Large metropolitan area 2 553 000 55

    Kielce PL012 Metropolitan area 398 000 50

    Konin PL022 Medium-sized area 170 000 44

    Koszalin PL028 Medium-sized area 56 000 13

    Legnica PL516 Medium-sized area 133 000 77

    Leszno PL048 Medium-sized area 115 000 56

    Lodz PL002 Metropolitan area 919 000 83

    Lomza PL047 Small area 88 000 24

    Lubin PL033 Medium-sized area 117 000 69

    Lublin PL009 Metropolitan area 674 000 51

    Nowy Sacz PL020 Metropolitan area 266 000 32

    Olsztyn PL014 Metropolitan area 260 000 66

    Opole PL016 Medium-sized area 252 000 52

    Ostrow Wielkopolski PL039 Medium-sized area 140 000 50

    Ostrowiec Swietokrzyski PL036 Medium-sized area 116 000 61

    Pabianice PL043 Small area 95 000 67

    Pila PL034 Small area 91 000 81

    Piotrkow Trybunalski PL032 Medium-sized area 146 000 50

    Plock PL026 Medium-sized area 222 000 54

    Poznan PL005 Metropolitan area 975 000 56

    Przemysl PL040 Medium-sized area 123 000 13

    Radom PL025 Metropolitan area 285 000 74

    Rybnik PL508 Medium-sized area 138 000 100

    Rzeszow PL015 Metropolitan area 503 000 40

    Siedlce PL031 Medium-sized area 142 000 12

    Slupsk PL029 Medium-sized area 166 000 10

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Stalowa Wola PL045 Medium-sized area 192 000 34

    Stargard Szczecinski PL038 Small area 73 000 8

    Suwalki PL021 Small area 86 000 17

    Swidnica PL049 Small area 107 000 55

    Szczecin PL007 Metropolitan area 72 000 8

    Tarnow PL514 Metropolitan area 307 000 11

    Tczew PL051 Small area 79 000 74

    Tomaszow Mazowiecki PL046 Small area 74 000 83

    Torun PL013 Metropolitan area 323 000 62

    Walbrzych PL511 Medium-sized area 254 000 77

    Warsaw PL001 Large metropolitan area 3 087 000 55

    Wloclawek PL513 Medium-sized area 182 000 5

    Wroclaw PL004 Metropolitan area 855 000 73

    Zamosc PL041 Medium-sized area 138 000 18

    Zielona Gora PL018 Medium-sized area 213 000 65

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Portugal

    Note: This map is for illustrative purposes and is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory covered by

    these maps.

    The population grid used to create the FUAs in Portugal is the 2011 Geostat grid. The geographic building blocks are the LAU-

    1 units. Commuting data comes from the 2011 Census.

    Table 1. List of functional urban areas

    FUA name FUA code Size class Population in 2015 (GHS)

    Share of population living in the city (%)

    Aveiro PT008 Medium-sized area 140 000 55

    Braga PT003 Medium-sized area 249 000 74

    Coimbra PT005 Metropolitan area 272 000 51

    Faro PT009 Medium-sized area 122 000 53

    Funchal PT004 Medium-sized area 215 000 51

    Guimaraes PT505 Medium-sized area 177 000 87

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Lisbon PT001 Large metropolitan area 2 917 000 64

    Ponta Delgada PT007 Medium-sized area 116 000 54

    Porto PT002 Metropolitan area 1 268 000 81

    Povoa de Varzim PT019 Small area 63 000 100

    Viana do Castelo PT016 Small area 87 000 100

    Vila Franca de Xira PT508 Medium-sized area 121 000 100

    Viseu PT014 Medium-sized area 111 000 89

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Slovak Republic

    Note: This map is for illustrative purposes and is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory covered by

    these maps.

    The population grid used to create the FUAs in Slovak Republic is the 2011 Geostat grid. The geographic building blocks are

    the LAU-2 units.

    Table 1. List of functional urban areas

    FUA name FUA code Size class Population in 2015 (GHS)

    Share of population living in the city (%)

    Banska Bystrica SK003 Medium-sized area 78 000 100

    Bratislava SK001 Metropolitan area 406 000 100

    Kosice SK002 Metropolitan area 245 000 100

    Nitra SK004 Medium-sized area 75 000 100

    Presov SK005 Medium-sized area 91 000 100

    Trencin SK008 Medium-sized area 55 000 100

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] Version: November 2020

    Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

    Trnava SK007 Medium-sized area 62 000 100

    Zilina SK006 Medium-sized area 80 000 100

    mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy

  • [email protected] V