Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Introduction
The OECD, in cooperation with the EU, has developed a harmonised definition of functional urban areas (FUAs). Being
composed of a city (or core) and its commuting zone, FUAs encompass the economic and functional extent of cities based on
daily people’s movements (OECD, 2012); (Dijkstra, Poelman, & Veneri, 2019). The definition of FUA aims at providing a
functional/economic definition of cities and their area of influence, by maximising international comparability and overcoming
the limitation of using purely administrative approaches. At the same time, the concept of FUA, unlike other approaches,
ensures a minimum link to the government level of the city or metropolitan area.
FUAs are listed below by size, according to four classes:
• Small FUAs, with population between 50,000 and 100,000
• Medium-sized FUAs, with population between 100,000 and 250,000
• Metropolitan FUAs, with population between 250,000 and 1.5 million
• Large metropolitan FUAs, with population above 1.5 million
A city is a group of local administrative units (i.e. LAU for European countries, such as municipality, local authorities, etc.)
where at least 50% of its population live in an urban centre. An urban centre is defined as a cluster of contiguous grid cells of
one square kilometer with a density of at least 1,500 inhabitants per square kilometer and a population of at least 50,000
inhabitants overall.
The commuting zone is composed of the local administrative units for which at least 15% of their workforce commute to the
city. Commuting zones of the functional areas are identified based on commuting data (travel from home-to-work). Commuting
data are also used to define whether more than one city share the same commuting zone in a single polycentric functional
urban area.
The list of functional urban areas takes into account the results of the consultation with the European National Statistical
Institutes launched by Eurostat in June 2011 on the definition of cities and by the OECD with Delegates from the Working
Party on Territorial Indicators. This list of functional urban areas may be reviewed on the basis of additional comments provided
by countries. The OECD Metropolitan Database provides a set of economic, environmental, social and demographic modelled
indicators on the 668 OECD metropolitan areas (functional urban areas with 250 000 or more inhabitants).
Additionally, interactive maps, histograms and summary profiles of each metropolitan area are available on the OECD
Regions and Cities Data Visualisation tool.
Note: This document includes information as of 2019.
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policyhttps://regions-cities-atlas.oecd.org/https://regions-cities-atlas.oecd.org/
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Australia
Note: This map is for illustrative purposes and is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory covered by
these maps.
The population grid used to create the FUAs in Australia is the 2015 Global Human Settlement (GHS) grid. The geographic
building blocks are the Statistical Areas Level 2 (SA2).
Table 1. List of functional urban areas
FUA name FUA code Size class Population in 2015 (GHS)
Share of population living in the city (%)
Ballarat AUS18 Medium-sized area 130 000 66
Bendigo AUS19 Medium-sized area 107 000 65
Cairns AUS15 Medium-sized area 162 000 59
Canberra AUS07 Metropolitan area 400 000 74
Geelong AUS14 Metropolitan area 273 000 60
Gold Coast AUS06 Metropolitan area 548 000 56
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Greater Adelaide AUS05 Metropolitan area 1 354 000 87
Greater Brisbane AUS03 Large metropolitan area 2 262 000 72
Greater Darwin AUS16 Medium-sized area 130 000 39
Greater Hobart AUS12 Medium-sized area 214 000 32
Greater Melbourne AUS02 Large metropolitan area 4 445 000 87
Greater Perth AUS04 Large metropolitan area 1 891 000 74
Greater Sydney AUS01 Large metropolitan area 4 738 000 87
Newcastle AUS08 Metropolitan area 455 000 62
Sunshine Coast AUS11 Metropolitan area 233 000 37
Toowoomba AUS17 Medium-sized area 171 000 58
Townsville AUS13 Medium-sized area 193 000 65
Wollongong AUS10 Metropolitan area 273 000 49
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Austria
Note: This map is for illustrative purposes and is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory covered by
these maps.
The population grid used to create the FUAs in Austria is the 2011 Geostat grid. The geographic building blocks are the LAU-
2 units. Commuting data comes from the 2011 Census.
Table 1. List of functional urban areas
FUA name FUA code Size class Population in 2015 (GHS)
Share of population living in the city (%)
Graz AT002 Metropolitan area 633 000 43
Innsbruck AT005 Metropolitan area 334 000 37
Klagenfurt AT006 Metropolitan area 251 000 38
Linz AT003 Metropolitan area 624 000 30
Salzburg AT004 Metropolitan area 362 000 40
Vienna AT001 Large metropolitan area 2 828 000 62
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Belgium
Note: This map is for illustrative purposes and is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory covered by
these maps.
The population grid used to create the FUAs in Belgium is the 2011 Geostat grid. The geographic building blocks are the LAU-
2 units.
Table 1. List of functional urban areas
FUA name FUA code Size class Population in 2015 (GHS)
Share of population living in the city (%)
Antwerp BE002 Metropolitan area 1 123 000 44
Bruges BE006 Medium-sized area 241 000 49
Brussels BE001 Large metropolitan area 3 218 000 3
Charleroi BE004 Metropolitan area 507 000 100
Gent BE003 Metropolitan area 633 000 39
Kortrijk BE010 Medium-sized area 202 000 32
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Leuven BE008 Medium-sized area 222 000 39
Liege BE005 Metropolitan area 789 000 100
Mechelen BE012 Medium-sized area 115 000 70
Mons BE009 Medium-sized area 249 000 100
Mouscron BE013 Small area 70 000 82
Namur BE007 Medium-sized area 262 000 42
Ostend BE011 Medium-sized area 125 000 51
Verviers (greater city) BE015 Medium-sized area 108 000 100
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Canada
Note: This map is for illustrative purposes and is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory covered by
these maps.
The population grid used to create the FUAs in Canada is the 2015 Global Human Settlement (GHS) grid. The geographic
building blocks are the Census Subdivisions. Commuting data comes from the 2016 Census.
Table 1. List of functional urban areas
FUA name FUA code Size class Population in 2015 (GHS)
Share of population living in the city (%)
Abbotsford CAN21 Medium-sized area 190 000 77
Brantford CAN24 Medium-sized area 141 000 70
Calgary CAN05 Large metropolitan area 1 502 000 82
Edmonton CAN06 Metropolitan area 1 333 000 81
Guelph CAN22 Medium-sized area 181 000 70
Halifax CAN12 Metropolitan area 461 000 88
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Hamilton CAN09 Metropolitan area 628 000 87
Kitchener CAN11 Metropolitan area 566 000 83
London CAN10 Metropolitan area 568 000 68
Montreal CAN02 Large metropolitan area 4 326 000 75
Niagara Falls CAN26 Small area 85 000 100
Ottawa CAN04 Large metropolitan area 1 500 000 84
Peterborough CAN25 Medium-sized area 119 000 68
Quebec CAN07 Metropolitan area 894 000 64
Red Deer CAN23 Medium-sized area 182 000 54
Regina CAN20 Medium-sized area 207 000 100
Saskatoon CAN15 Metropolitan area 283 000 87
Sherbrooke CAN16 Metropolitan area 262 000 63
St Catharines CAN17 Medium-sized area 208 000 64
St Johns CAN19 Medium-sized area 203 000 56
Toronto CAN01 Large metropolitan area 7 070 000 89
Trois Rivieres CAN18 Medium-sized area 200 000 68
Vancouver CAN03 Large metropolitan area 2 509 000 88
Victoria CAN13 Metropolitan area 357 000 63
Windsor CAN14 Metropolitan area 345 000 58
Winnipeg CAN08 Metropolitan area 849 000 83
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Switzerland
Note: This map is for illustrative purposes and is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory covered by
these maps.
The population grid used to create the FUAs in Switzerland is the 2011 Geostat grid. The geographic building blocks are the
LAU-2 units. Commuting data comes from the 2011 Census.
Table 1. List of functional urban areas
FUA name FUA code Size class Population in 2015 (GHS)
Share of population living in the city (%)
Basel CH003 Metropolitan area 510 000 28
Bern CH004 Metropolitan area 402 000 30
Biel/Bienne CH010 Medium-sized area 101 000 55
Geneva CH002 Metropolitan area 571 000 35
Lausanne CH005 Metropolitan area 403 000 31
Lucerne CH008 Medium-sized area 214 000 32
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Lugano CH009 Medium-sized area 147 000 37
St. Gallen CH007 Medium-sized area 163 000 45
Thun CH011 Small area 37 000 100
Winterthur CH006 Medium-sized area 141 000 76
Zug CH012 Small area 23 000 100
Zurich CH001 Metropolitan area 1 333 000 29
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Chile
Note: This map is for illustrative purposes and is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory covered by
these maps.
The population grid used to create the FUAs in Chile is the 2015 Global Human Settlement (GHS) grid. The geographic
building blocks are the communes. Commuting data comes from the 2002 Census.
Table 1. List of functional urban areas
FUA name FUA code Size class Population in 2015 (GHS)
Share of population living in the city (%)
Antofagasta CL004 Metropolitan area 390 000 100
Arica CL001 Medium-sized area 169 000 100
Calama CL003 Medium-sized area 149 000 100
Calera CL008 Small area 54 000 100
Chillan CL019 Medium-sized area 223 000 96
Concepcion CL020 Metropolitan area 949 000 49
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Copiapo CL005 Medium-sized area 177 000 100
Coquimbo-La Serena CL006 Metropolitan area 472 000 98
Curico CL016 Medium-sized area 156 000 94
Iquique CL002 Medium-sized area 186 000 100
Linares CL018 Small area 92 000 100
Los Angeles CL021 Medium-sized area 212 000 100
Melipilla CL013 Medium-sized area 111 000 100
Osorno CL024 Medium-sized area 168 000 100
Ovalle CL007 Medium-sized area 111 000 100
Puerto Montt CL025 Metropolitan area 263 000 100
Punta Arenas CL026 Medium-sized area 123 000 100
Quillota CL009 Medium-sized area 111 000 84
Rancagua CL014 Metropolitan area 360 000 70
San Antonio CL012 Medium-sized area 132 000 71
San Fernando CL015 Small area 75 000 100
Santiago CL011 Large metropolitan area 7 182 000 94
Talca CL017 Metropolitan area 284 000 92
Temuco CL022 Metropolitan area 474 000 87
Valdivia CL023 Metropolitan area 166 000 100
Valparaiso CL010 Metropolitan area 960 000 88
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Colombia
Note: This map is for illustrative purposes and is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory covered by
these maps.
The population grid used to create the FUAs in Colombia is the 2015 Global Human Settlement (GHS) grid. The geographic
building blocks are the municipalities. Commuting data comes from the 2005 Census.
Table 1. List of functional urban areas
FUA name FUA code Size class Population in 2015 (GHS)
Share of population living in the city (%)
Aguachica COL48 Small area 90 000 100
Apartado COL28 Medium-sized area 145 000 100
Arauca COL50 Small area 114 000 100
Armenia COL13 Metropolitan area 403 000 92
Barrancabermeja COL22 Medium-sized area 196 000 100
Barranquilla COL04 Large metropolitan area 2 214 000 88
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Bogota D.C. COL01 Large metropolitan area 8 953 000 99
Bucaramanga COL06 Metropolitan area 1 159 000 100
Buenaventura COL17 Metropolitan area 393 000 100
Cali COL03 Large metropolitan area 2 599 000 97
Cartagena COL05 Metropolitan area 1 181 000 79
Cartago COL30 Medium-sized area 129 000 100
Caucasia COL46 Medium-sized area 96 000 100
Cienaga COL41 Medium-sized area 104 000 100
Cucuta COL07 Metropolitan area 792 000 100
Duitama COL39 Medium-sized area 104 000 100
El Carmen de Bolivar COL52 Small area 64 000 100
Espinal COL49 Small area 78 000 100
Facatativa COL38 Medium-sized area 135 000 100
Florence COL27 Medium-sized area 185 000 100
Fundacion COL53 Small area 58 000 100
Fusagasuga COL37 Medium-sized area 131 000 100
Girardot COL29 Medium-sized area 124 000 100
Guadalajara de Buga COL34 Medium-sized area 108 000 100
Ibague COL09 Metropolitan area 568 000 100
Ipiales COL35 Medium-sized area 137 000 96
La Dorada COL45 Small area 89 000 100
Magangue COL32 Medium-sized area 121 000 100
Maicao COL31 Medium-sized area 156 000 100
Manizales COL10 Metropolitan area 439 000 100
Medellin COL02 Large metropolitan area 3 578 000 99
Monteria COL15 Metropolitan area 433 000 100
Neiva COL18 Metropolitan area 335 000 100
Ocana COL44 Medium-sized area 93 000 100
Palmira COL19 Metropolitan area 304 000 100
Pasto COL12 Metropolitan area 414 000 100
Pereira COL08 Metropolitan area 666 000 100
Popayan COL20 Metropolitan area 294 000 100
Quibdo COL36 Medium-sized area 145 000 100
Riohacha COL25 Metropolitan area 244 000 100
Rionegro COL43 Medium-sized area 111 000 100
Sabanalarga COL47 Medium-sized area 94 000 100
San Andres de Tumaco COL26 Medium-sized area 163 000 100
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Santa Marta COL11 Metropolitan area 479 000 100
Santa Rosa de Cabal COL51 Small area 66 000 100
Sincelejo COL21 Metropolitan area 271 000 100
Sogamoso COL33 Medium-sized area 106 000 100
Tulua COL23 Medium-sized area 203 000 100
Tunja COL24 Medium-sized area 207 000 85
Valledupar COL16 Metropolitan area 433 000 100
Villavicencio COL14 Metropolitan area 462 000 100
Yopal COL40 Medium-sized area 194 000 100
Zipaquira COL42 Medium-sized area 120 000 100
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Czech Republic
Note: This map is for illustrative purposes and is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory covered by
these maps.
The population grid used to create the FUAs in Czech Republic is the 2011 Geostat grid. The geographic building blocks are
the LAU-2 units. Commuting data comes from the 2011 Census.
Table 1. List of functional urban areas
FUA name FUA code Size class Population in 2015 (GHS)
Share of population living in the city (%)
Brno CZ002 Metropolitan area 732 000 53
Carlsbad CZ013 Small area 89 000 52
Ceske Budejovice CZ008 Medium-sized area 183 000 49
Chomutov CZ018 Small area 80 000 80
Hradec Kralove CZ009 Medium-sized area 154 000 61
Jihlava CZ014 Medium-sized area 100 000 50
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Liberec CZ007 Medium-sized area 145 000 72
Most CZ016 Medium-sized area 99 000 61
Olomouc CZ006 Medium-sized area 207 000 48
Ostrava CZ003 Metropolitan area 702 000 59
Pardubice CZ010 Medium-sized area 201 000 44
Plzen CZ004 Metropolitan area 348 000 49
Prague CZ001 Large metropolitan area 2 249 000 61
Usti nad Labem CZ005 Medium-sized area 119 000 77
Zlin CZ011 Medium-sized area 145 000 48
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Germany
Note: This map is for illustrative purposes and is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory covered by
these maps.
The population grid used to create the FUAs in Germany is the 2011 Geostat grid. The geographic building blocks are the
NUTS-3 units. Commuting data comes from the Register.
Table 1. List of functional urban areas
FUA name FUA code Size class Population in 2015 (GHS)
Share of population living in the city (%)
Aachen DE507 Metropolitan area 532 000 43
Aschaffenburg DE061 Metropolitan area 371 000 18
Augsburg DE033 Metropolitan area 648 000 41
Bamberg DE062 Medium-sized area 218 000 33
Bayreuth DE059 Medium-sized area 249 000 28
Berlin DE001 Large metropolitan area 4 950 000 71
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Bielefeld DE017 Metropolitan area 332 000 100
Bocholt, Stadt DE549 Metropolitan area 374 000 20
Bonn DE034 Metropolitan area 894 000 41
Brandenburg an der Havel
DE056 Small area 73 000 100
Braunschweig-Salzgitter Wolfsburg
DE083 Metropolitan area 976 000 47
Bremen DE012 Metropolitan area 1 238 000 44
Bremerhaven DE527 Metropolitan area 304 000 36
Celle DE060 Medium-sized area 176 000 39
Chemnitz DE505 Medium-sized area 239 000 100
Cologne DE004 Large metropolitan area 1 949 000 68
Constance DE054 Metropolitan area 268 000 29
Cottbus DE539 Medium-sized area 223 000 45
Darmstadt DE025 Metropolitan area 438 000 35
Dessau DE082 Small area 90 000 100
Dresden DE009 Metropolitan area 1 316 000 40
Duren, Stadt DE548 Metropolitan area 256 000 34
Dusseldorf DE011 Large metropolitan area 1 526 000 49
Erfurt DE032 Metropolitan area 517 000 40
Flensburg DE052 Metropolitan area 273 000 29
Frankfurt DE029 Small area 56 000 100
Frankfurt am Main DE005 Large metropolitan area 2 573 000 35
Freiburg im Breisgau DE027 Metropolitan area 629 000 35
Friedrichshafen DE072 Medium-sized area 208 000 28
Fulda DE065 Medium-sized area 218 000 29
Gera DE535 Medium-sized area 191 000 48
Giessen DE057 Metropolitan area 257 000 30
Gorlitz DE074 Metropolitan area 254 000 20
Gottingen DE021 Metropolitan area 449 000 26
Greifswald DE078 Medium-sized area 235 000 23
Halle an der Saale DE018 Metropolitan area 415 000 55
Hamburg DE002 Large metropolitan area 3 176 000 55
Hanover DE013 Metropolitan area 1 269 000 41
Heidelberg DE522 Metropolitan area 688 000 23
Heilbronn DE529 Metropolitan area 444 000 26
Hildesheim DE542 Metropolitan area 275 000 36
Ingolstadt DE534 Metropolitan area 471 000 28
Iserlohn DE045 Metropolitan area 419 000 22
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Jena DE547 Medium-sized area 193 000 57
Kaiserslautern DE044 Metropolitan area 273 000 35
Karlsruhe DE035 Metropolitan area 733 000 41
Kassel DE513 Metropolitan area 430 000 44
Kempten (Allgau) DE066 Medium-sized area 217 000 31
Kiel DE039 Metropolitan area 631 000 37
Koblenz DE042 Metropolitan area 326 000 34
Krefeld DE508 Medium-sized area 218 000 100
Landshut DE067 Medium-sized area 218 000 30
Leipzig DE008 Metropolitan area 972 000 53
Lubeck DE510 Metropolitan area 400 000 53
Luneburg DE058 Medium-sized area 180 000 40
Magdeburg DE019 Metropolitan area 490 000 47
Mainz DE037 Metropolitan area 416 000 50
Mannheim-Ludwigshafen
DE084 Metropolitan area 1 139 000 47
Marburg DE053 Medium-sized area 241 000 30
Monchengladbach DE036 Metropolitan area 252 000 100
Muenster DE504 Metropolitan area 526 000 59
Munich DE003 Large metropolitan area 2 825 000 50
Neubrandenburg DE064 Metropolitan area 251 000 23
Neumunster DE055 Small area 76 000 100
Nuremberg DE014 Metropolitan area 1 299 000 55
Offenburg DE073 Metropolitan area 417 000 14
Oldenburg (Oldenburg) DE520 Metropolitan area 411 000 38
Osnabruck DE517 Metropolitan area 508 000 31
Paderborn DE523 Metropolitan area 302 000 48
Passau DE081 Medium-sized area 241 000 21
Pforzheim DE533 Metropolitan area 308 000 37
Plauen DE063 Medium-sized area 229 000 27
Regensburg DE028 Metropolitan area 446 000 31
Remscheid DE530 Medium-sized area 109 000 100
Reutlingen DE537 Metropolitan area 273 000 41
Rosenheim DE069 Metropolitan area 308 000 19
Rostock DE043 Metropolitan area 406 000 48
Ruhr DE038 Large metropolitan area 5 017 000 71
Saarbrucken DE040 Metropolitan area 792 000 22
Schweinfurt DE077 Metropolitan area 268 000 19
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Schwerin DE031 Metropolitan area 296 000 30
Siegen DE540 Metropolitan area 402 000 24
Solingen DE516 Medium-sized area 156 000 100
Stralsund DE071 Medium-sized area 209 000 24
Stuttgart DE007 Large metropolitan area 2 661 000 31
Trier DE026 Metropolitan area 258 000 43
Tubingen DE050 Medium-sized area 216 000 39
Ulm DE532 Metropolitan area 475 000 36
Villingen-Schwenningen DE051 Medium-sized area 204 000 39
Weimar DE030 Medium-sized area 144 000 44
Wetzlar DE079 Metropolitan area 253 000 20
Wiesbaden DE020 Metropolitan area 455 000 60
Wilhelmshaven DE048 Medium-sized area 171 000 43
Wuppertal DE546 Metropolitan area 328 000 100
Wurzburg DE524 Metropolitan area 499 000 25
Zwickau DE544 Metropolitan area 323 000 28
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Denmark
Note: This map is for illustrative purposes and is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory covered by
these maps.
The population grid used to create the FUAs in Denmark is the 2011 Geostat grid. The geographic building blocks are the
LAU-1 units. Commuting data comes from the Register.
Table 1. List of functional urban areas
FUA name FUA code Size class Population in 2015 (GHS)
Share of population living in the city (%)
Aalborg DK004 Metropolitan area 296 000 65
Aarhus DK002 Metropolitan area 486 000 65
Copenhagen DK001 Large metropolitan area 1 799 000 32
Odense DK003 Metropolitan area 363 000 52
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Spain
Note: This map is for illustrative purposes and is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory covered by
these maps.
The population grid used to create the FUAs in Spain is the 2011 Geostat grid. The geographic building blocks are the LAU-
2 units. Commuting data comes from the 2011 Census.
Table 1. List of functional urban areas
FUA name FUA code Size class Population in 2015 (GHS)
Share of population living in the city (%)
Albacete ES519 Medium-sized area 185 000 89
Alcoy ES537 Small area 74 000 83
Algeciras ES532 Metropolitan area 207 000 90
Alicante ES021 Metropolitan area 440 000 84
Almeria ES514 Medium-sized area 213 000 85
Arrecife ES072 Medium-sized area 96 000 54
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Avila ES538 Small area 60 000 95
Aviles ES039 Medium-sized area 116 000 67
Badajoz ES017 Medium-sized area 171 000 81
Barcelona ES002 Large metropolitan area 4 717 000 72
Basin ES542 Small area 59 000 91
Benidorm ES054 Medium-sized area 148 000 48
Bilbao ES019 Metropolitan area 928 000 56
Burgos ES515 Medium-sized area 193 000 86
Caceres ES034 Medium-sized area 112 000 80
Cadiz ES522 Medium-sized area 125 000 69
Cartagena ES506 Medium-sized area 225 000 92
Castellon de la Plana/Castello de la Plana
ES520 Medium-sized area 228 000 74
Ceuta ES045 Small area 72 000 100
Chiclana de la Frontera ES540 Small area 78 000 100
Ciudad Real ES053 Medium-sized area 101 000 72
Cordoba ES020 Metropolitan area 344 000 91
Coruna (A) ES026 Metropolitan area 359 000 55
Donostia-San Sebastian ES510 Metropolitan area 307 000 55
Eivissa ES543 Medium-sized area 124 000 38
Elche/Elx ES505 Metropolitan area 268 000 87
Elda ES073 Small area 56 000 100
Ferrol ES043 Medium-sized area 130 000 43
Gandia ES046 Medium-sized area 106 000 72
Gijon ES023 Metropolitan area 263 000 91
Girona ES033 Medium-sized area 179 000 57
Granada ES501 Metropolitan area 544 000 42
Guadalajara ES048 Medium-sized area 124 000 74
Huelva ES521 Medium-sized area 220 000 66
Igualada ES552 Small area 73 000 46
Irun ES070 Small area 66 000 78
Jaen ES527 Medium-sized area 153 000 72
Jerez de la Frontera ES508 Medium-sized area 213 000 97
Las Palmas ES008 Metropolitan area 608 000 75
Leon ES523 Medium-sized area 203 000 58
Linares ES544 Small area 60 000 95
Linea de la Concepcion, La
ES065 Small area 56 000 100
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Lleida ES528 Medium-sized area 184 000 75
Logrono ES018 Medium-sized area 186 000 81
Lorca ES545 Medium-sized area 107 000 86
Lugo ES031 Medium-sized area 112 000 80
Madrid ES001 Large metropolitan area 6 614 000 80
Malaga ES006 Metropolitan area 816 000 83
Manresa ES050 Medium-sized area 123 000 62
Marbella ES533 Metropolitan area 291 000 69
Melilla ES055 Small area 97 000 100
Merida ES546 Small area 80 000 68
Murcia ES007 Metropolitan area 618 000 72
Ourense ES529 Medium-sized area 138 000 71
Oviedo ES013 Metropolitan area 296 000 70
Palencia ES041 Medium-sized area 95 000 78
Palma de Mallorca ES010 Metropolitan area 659 000 60
Pamplona ES014 Metropolitan area 366 000 47
Ponferrada ES057 Small area 83 000 76
Pontevedra ES044 Medium-sized area 122 000 62
Puerto de Santa Maria, El
ES037 Small area 85 000 100
Puerto de la Cruz ES550 Small area 62 000 29
Reus ES028 Medium-sized area 124 000 88
Sagunto ES547 Small area 76 000 84
Salamanca ES516 Medium-sized area 193 000 74
Sanlucar de Barrameda ES062 Small area 63 000 100
Santa Cruz de Tenerife ES025 Metropolitan area 482 000 71
Santa Lucia de Tirajana ES074 Small area 67 000 100
Santander ES015 Metropolitan area 382 000 54
Santiago de Compostela
ES011 Medium-sized area 188 000 48
Saragossa ES005 Metropolitan area 748 000 87
Seville ES004 Large metropolitan area 1 489 000 59
Talavera de la Reina ES040 Medium-sized area 109 000 84
Tarragona ES525 Medium-sized area 216 000 57
Toledo ES016 Medium-sized area 152 000 56
Torrevieja ES035 Small area 89 000 94
Valencia ES003 Large metropolitan area 1 646 000 56
Valladolid ES009 Metropolitan area 408 000 73
Vigo ES022 Metropolitan area 483 000 53
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Vitoria ES012 Metropolitan area 265 000 89
Zamora ES059 Small area 66 000 90
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Estonia
Note: This map is for illustrative purposes and is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory covered by
these maps.
The population grid used to create the FUAs in Estonia is the 2011 Geostat grid. The geographic building blocks are the LAU-
2 units.
Table 1. List of functional urban areas
FUA name FUA code Size class Population in 2015 (GHS)
Share of population living in the city (%)
Narva EE003 Small area 54 000 100
Tallinn EE001 Metropolitan area 378 000 100
Tartu EE002 Medium-sized area 95 000 100
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Finland
Note: This map is for illustrative purposes and is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory covered by
these maps.
The population grid used to create the FUAs in Finland is the 2011 Geostat grid. The geographic building blocks are the LAU-
2 units. Commuting data comes from the Register.
Table 1. List of functional urban areas
FUA name FUA code Size class Population in 2015 (GHS)
Share of population living in the city (%)
Helsinki FI001 Metropolitan area 1 426 000 76
Jyvaskyla FI009 Medium-sized area 183 000 75
Kuopio FI008 Medium-sized area 164 000 72
Lahti FI007 Medium-sized area 193 000 62
Oulu FI004 Metropolitan area 250 000 77
Tampere FI002 Metropolitan area 435 000 52
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Turku FI003 Metropolitan area 348 000 53
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
France
Note: This map is for illustrative purposes and is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory covered by
these maps.
The population grid used to create the FUAs in France is the 2011 Geostat grid. The geographic building blocks are the LAU-
2 units. Commuting data comes from the 2011 Census.
Table 1. List of functional urban areas
FUA name FUA code Size class Population in 2015 (GHS)
Share of population living in the city (%)
Aix-en-Provence FR202 Metropolitan area 341 000 42
Ajaccio FR027 Medium-sized area 94 000 78
Albi FR096 Medium-sized area 138 000 60
Amiens FR014 Metropolitan area 337 000 39
Angers FR036 Metropolitan area 412 000 39
Angouleme FR056 Medium-sized area 203 000 52
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Annecy FR048 Metropolitan area 277 000 41
Annemasse FR047 Small area 80 000 70
Arras FR064 Medium-sized area 159 000 42
Avignon FR039 Metropolitan area 328 000 32
Bayonne FR046 Metropolitan area 255 000 44
Beauvais FR082 Medium-sized area 147 000 53
Belfort FR076 Medium-sized area 143 000 44
Besancon FR025 Metropolitan area 280 000 41
Beziers FR063 Medium-sized area 184 000 39
Bordeaux FR007 Metropolitan area 1 188 000 51
Boulogne-sur-Mer FR057 Medium-sized area 153 000 46
Bourges FR065 Medium-sized area 171 000 37
Brest FR037 Metropolitan area 342 000 36
Brive-la-Gaillarde FR093 Medium-sized area 131 000 62
Caen FR023 Metropolitan area 431 000 33
Calais FR062 Medium-sized area 141 000 49
Cannes FR519 Medium-sized area 177 000 41
Cayenne FR521 Medium-sized area 126 000 44
Chalon-sur-Saone FR059 Medium-sized area 164 000 64
Chalons-en-Champagne
FR104 Small area 88 000 71
Chambery FR058 Medium-sized area 195 000 43
Charleville-Mezieres FR505 Medium-sized area 128 000 49
Chartres FR060 Medium-sized area 164 000 43
Chateauroux FR090 Medium-sized area 119 000 61
Cherbourg FR069 Medium-sized area 147 000 50
Clermont-Ferrand FR022 Metropolitan area 490 000 37
Colmar FR506 Medium-sized area 199 000 34
Compiegne FR074 Medium-sized area 153 000 46
Creil FR084 Medium-sized area 137 000 49
Dijon FR020 Metropolitan area 405 000 46
Douai FR209 Medium-sized area 201 000 43
Dunkerque FR042 Metropolitan area 248 000 51
Evreux FR086 Medium-sized area 142 000 58
Fort-de-France FR030 Metropolitan area 315 000 30
Frejus FR099 Medium-sized area 119 000 73
Grenoble FR026 Metropolitan area 661 000 44
Henin - Carvin FR208 Medium-sized area 120 000 100
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
La Rochelle FR053 Medium-sized area 216 000 36
Le Havre FR012 Metropolitan area 312 000 58
Le Mans FR038 Metropolitan area 370 000 38
Lens - Lievin FR207 Metropolitan area 297 000 58
Les Abymes FR520 Metropolitan area 268 000 25
Lille FR009 Metropolitan area 1 467 000 60
Limoges FR024 Metropolitan area 335 000 45
Lorient FR049 Medium-sized area 205 000 33
Lyon FR003 Large metropolitan area 2 017 000 51
Mamoudzou FR522 Small area 55 000 100
Marseille FR203 Metropolitan area 1 246 000 70
Martigues FR324 Small area 79 000 76
Metz FR017 Metropolitan area 367 000 43
Montbeliard FR050 Medium-sized area 192 000 59
Montpellier FR010 Metropolitan area 684 000 41
Mulhouse FR040 Metropolitan area 401 000 44
Nancy FR016 Metropolitan area 505 000 40
Nantes FR008 Metropolitan area 924 000 44
Nice FR205 Metropolitan area 1 005 000 64
Nimes FR044 Metropolitan area 335 000 43
Niort FR061 Medium-sized area 179 000 58
Orleans FR019 Metropolitan area 430 000 45
Paris FR001 Large metropolitan area 12 794 000 78
Pau FR045 Metropolitan area 287 000 38
Perpignan FR043 Metropolitan area 403 000 33
Poitiers FR021 Metropolitan area 275 000 35
Quimper FR067 Medium-sized area 179 000 48
Reims FR018 Metropolitan area 343 000 56
Rennes FR013 Metropolitan area 672 000 29
Roanne FR077 Medium-sized area 129 000 35
Rouen FR215 Metropolitan area 684 000 44
Saint Denis FR028 Metropolitan area 302 000 45
Saint-Brieuc FR066 Medium-sized area 183 000 34
Saint-Etienne FR011 Metropolitan area 476 000 37
Saint-Nazaire FR052 Medium-sized area 165 000 36
Saint-Quentin FR079 Medium-sized area 120 000 38
Strasbourg FR006 Metropolitan area 805 000 48
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Tarbes FR073 Medium-sized area 137 000 54
Toulon FR032 Metropolitan area 530 000 56
Toulouse FR004 Metropolitan area 1 391 000 42
Tours FR035 Metropolitan area 508 000 46
Troyes FR051 Medium-sized area 208 000 49
Valence FR214 Metropolitan area 249 000 37
Valenciennes FR034 Metropolitan area 323 000 32
Vannes FR068 Medium-sized area 200 000 69
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
United Kingdom
Note: This map is for illustrative purposes and is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory covered by
these maps.
The population grid used to create the FUAs in the United Kingdom is the 2011 Geostat grid. The geographic building blocks
are the LAU-1 units. Commuting data comes from the 2011 Census.
Table 1. List of functional urban areas
FUA name FUA code Size class Population in 2015 (GHS)
Share of population living in the city (%)
Aberdeen UK016 Metropolitan area 479 000 47
Ashford UK041 Medium-sized area 124 000 100
Basingstoke and Deane UK548 Medium-sized area 173 000 100
Bath and North East Somerset
UK031 Medium-sized area 178 000 100
Bedford UK549 Medium-sized area 165 000 100
Belfast UK012 Metropolitan area 770 000 43
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Blackburn with Darwen UK557 Metropolitan area 289 000 80
Blackpool UK553 Metropolitan area 318 000 44
Bournemouth UK539 Metropolitan area 509 000 65
Bracknell Forest UK573 Medium-sized area 117 000 100
Brighton and Hove UK515 Metropolitan area 427 000 62
Bristol UK011 Metropolitan area 918 000 47
Burnley UK050 Medium-sized area 175 000 49
Cambridge UK017 Metropolitan area 377 000 33
Cannock Chase UK054 Small area 97 000 100
Cardiff UK009 Metropolitan area 895 000 40
Carlisle UK575 Medium-sized area 110 000 100
Cheltenham UK571 Medium-sized area 204 000 55
Cheshire West and Chester
UK568 Metropolitan area 484 000 68
Chesterfield UK047 Medium-sized area 104 000 100
Colchester UK546 Metropolitan area 308 000 58
Corby UK582 Small area 64 000 100
Coventry UK025 Metropolitan area 694 000 100
Crawley UK576 Medium-sized area 106 000 100
Dacorum UK556 Medium-sized area 146 000 100
Darlington UK044 Medium-sized area 106 000 100
Derby UK518 Metropolitan area 483 000 53
Derry & Strabane Local Government District
UK586 Medium-sized area 151 000 100
Doncaster UK506 Metropolitan area 310 000 100
Dundee City UK550 Metropolitan area 258 000 56
East Staffordshire UK043 Medium-sized area 115 000 100
Eastbourne UK055 Medium-sized area 99 000 100
Edinburgh UK007 Metropolitan area 845 000 57
Exeter UK018 Metropolitan area 454 000 26
Falkirk UK551 Medium-sized area 158 000 100
Fareham UK036 Medium-sized area 113 000 100
Glasgow UK004 Large metropolitan area 1 784 000 66
Gloucester UK572 Medium-sized area 119 000 100
Gravesham UK020 Medium-sized area 105 000 100
Great Yarmouth UK051 Medium-sized area 97 000 100
Guildford UK033 Metropolitan area 263 000 52
Halton UK062 Medium-sized area 125 000 100
Hartlepool UK053 Small area 89 000 100
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Hastings UK056 Medium-sized area 177 000 49
Ipswich UK569 Metropolitan area 351 000 39
Kettering UK583 Medium-sized area 98 000 100
Kingston upon Hull UK026 Metropolitan area 593 000 43
Leeds UK003 Large metropolitan area 2 577 000 80
Leicester UK014 Metropolitan area 866 000 39
Lincoln UK019 Metropolitan area 303 000 30
Liverpool UK006 Large metropolitan area 1 487 000 83
London UK001 Large metropolitan area 11 954 000 82
Luton UK532 Medium-sized area 195 000 100
Maidstone UK554 Medium-sized area 162 000 100
Manchester UK008 Large metropolitan area 3 283 000 84
Mansfield UK046 Medium-sized area 106 000 100
Medway UK513 Metropolitan area 258 000 100
Middlesbrough UK559 Metropolitan area 554 000 76
Milton Keynes UK525 Metropolitan area 263 000 100
Newcastle upon Tyne UK013 Metropolitan area 1 142 000 72
Newport UK558 Medium-sized area 238 000 62
North East Lincolnshire UK543 Medium-sized area 156 000 100
Northampton UK528 Metropolitan area 462 000 46
Norwich UK566 Metropolitan area 394 000 32
Nottingham UK029 Metropolitan area 892 000 35
Nuneaton and Bedworth UK035 Medium-sized area 126 000 100
Oxford UK560 Metropolitan area 525 000 28
Peterborough UK545 Medium-sized area 198 000 100
Plymouth UK516 Metropolitan area 393 000 64
Portsmouth UK023 Metropolitan area 511 000 55
Preston UK562 Metropolitan area 255 000 56
Reading UK552 Metropolitan area 319 000 49
Redditch UK059 Small area 79 000 100
Rushmoor UK580 Small area 91 000 100
Sheffield UK010 Metropolitan area 1 160 000 91
Slough UK567 Medium-sized area 141 000 100
Southampton UK520 Metropolitan area 654 000 54
Stevenage UK021 Small area 81 000 100
Stoke-on-Trent UK027 Metropolitan area 471 000 79
Sunderland UK510 Metropolitan area 268 000 100
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Swansea UK517 Metropolitan area 386 000 62
Swindon UK535 Medium-sized area 221 000 100
Telford and Wrekin UK542 Medium-sized area 169 000 100
Thanet UK034 Medium-sized area 117 000 100
Torbay UK561 Medium-sized area 126 000 100
Tunbridge Wells UK040 Medium-sized area 116 000 100
Warrington UK531 Medium-sized area 205 000 100
Waveney UK038 Medium-sized area 114 000 100
West Midlands urban area
UK002 Large metropolitan area 3 024 000 86
Wirral UK030 Metropolitan area 313 000 100
Woking UK052 Medium-sized area 100 000 100
Worcester UK024 Medium-sized area 175 000 54
Worthing UK045 Medium-sized area 101 000 100
Wrexham UK022 Medium-sized area 137 000 100
Wycombe UK540 Medium-sized area 175 000 100
York UK533 Medium-sized area 204 000 100
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Greece
Note: This map is for illustrative purposes and is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory covered by
these maps.
The population grid used to create the FUAs in Greece is the 2011 Geostat grid. The geographic building blocks are the LAU-
2 units. Commuting data comes from the 2011 Census.
Table 1. List of functional urban areas
FUA name FUA code Size class Population in 2015 (GHS)
Share of population living in the city (%)
Athens EL001 Large metropolitan area 3 615 000 100
Chania EL010 Small area 94 000 67
Ioannina EL007 Medium-sized area 150 000 46
Irakleio EL004 Medium-sized area 221 000 62
Kalamata EL009 Small area 74 000 71
Katerini EL012 Small area 88 000 66
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Kavala EL008 Small area 65 000 68
Larisa EL005 Medium-sized area 203 000 71
Patras EL003 Medium-sized area 208 000 71
Serres EL013 Small area 89 000 64
Thessaloniki EL002 Metropolitan area 1 041 000 100
Trikala EL014 Medium-sized area 111 000 47
Volos EL006 Medium-sized area 143 000 56
Xanthi EL011 Small area 91 000 66
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Hungary
Note: This map is for illustrative purposes and is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory covered by
these maps.
The population grid used to create the FUAs in Hungary is the 2011 Geostat grid. The geographic building blocks are the
LAU-2 units. Commuting data comes from the 2011 Census.
Table 1. List of functional urban areas
FUA name FUA code Size class Population in 2015 (GHS)
Share of population living in the city (%)
Bekescsaba HU014 Medium-sized area 107 000 50
Budapest HU001 Large metropolitan area 2 969 000 60
Debrecen HU005 Metropolitan area 361 000 65
Dunaujvaros HU017 Small area 94 000 54
Eger HU016 Small area 104 000 54
Gyor HU007 Metropolitan area 241 000 53
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Kaposvar HU015 Medium-sized area 107 000 57
Kecskemet HU008 Medium-sized area 183 000 60
Miskolc HU002 Metropolitan area 297 000 55
Nyiregyhaza HU003 Medium-sized area 246 000 51
Pecs HU004 Medium-sized area 255 000 61
Sopron HU019 Medium-sized area 102 000 62
Szeged HU006 Medium-sized area 243 000 68
Szekesfehervar HU009 Metropolitan area 270 000 36
Szolnok HU011 Medium-sized area 154 000 45
Szombathely HU010 Medium-sized area 145 000 52
Tatabanya HU012 Medium-sized area 127 000 48
Veszprem HU013 Medium-sized area 127 000 45
Zalaegerszeg HU018 Medium-sized area 103 000 53
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Ireland
Note: This map is for illustrative purposes and is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory covered by
these maps.
The population grid used to create the FUAs in Ireland is the 2011 Geostat grid. The geographic building blocks are the LAU-
2 units.
Table 1. List of functional urban areas
FUA name FUA code Size class Population in 2015 (GHS)
Share of population living in the city (%)
Cork IE002 Metropolitan area 408 000 28
Dublin IE001 Large metropolitan area 1 828 000 28
Galway IE004 Medium-sized area 182 000 40
Limerick IE003 Medium-sized area 163 000 29
Waterford IE005 Medium-sized area 96 000 47
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Iceland
Note: This map is for illustrative purposes and is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory covered by
these maps.
The population grid used to create the FUAs in Iceland is the 2011 Geostat grid. The geographic building blocks are the LAU-
2 units.
Table 1. List of functional urban areas
FUA name FUA code Size class Population in 2015 (GHS)
Share of population living in the city (%)
Reykjavik IS001 Small area 205 000 99
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Italy
Note: This map is for illustrative purposes and is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory covered by
these maps.
The population grid used to create the FUAs in Italy is the 2011 Geostat grid. The geographic building blocks are the LAU-2
units. Commuting data comes from the 2011 Census.
Table 1. List of functional urban areas
FUA name FUA code Size class Population in 2015 (GHS)
Share of population living in the city (%)
Acireale IT056 Small area 60 000 86
Alexandria IT518 Medium-sized area 131 000 69
Altamura IT061 Small area 71 000 100
Ancona IT017 Medium-sized area 210 000 43
Andria IT524 Small area 99 000 100
Arezzo IT519 Medium-sized area 157 000 64
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Asti IT045 Medium-sized area 114 000 66
Avellino IT057 Medium-sized area 153 000 36
Bari IT008 Metropolitan area 701 000 58
Barletta IT038 Small area 92 000 100
Battipaglia IT064 Small area 60 000 83
Bergamo IT511 Metropolitan area 309 000 37
Bisceglie IT065 Small area 49 000 100
Bologna IT009 Metropolitan area 760 000 48
Bolzano IT034 Medium-sized area 195 000 53
Brescia IT029 Metropolitan area 482 000 39
Cagliari IT027 Metropolitan area 462 000 29
Campobasso IT020 Small area 100 000 46
Carpi IT066 Small area 87 000 80
Caserta IT021 Medium-sized area 125 000 64
Catania IT010 Metropolitan area 608 000 45
Catanzaro IT024 Medium-sized area 148 000 54
Cerignola IT067 Small area 56 000 100
Como IT040 Medium-sized area 164 000 47
Cosenza IT048 Medium-sized area 189 000 34
Cremona IT013 Medium-sized area 128 000 52
Ferrara IT507 Medium-sized area 206 000 62
Florence IT007 Metropolitan area 778 000 46
Foggia IT031 Medium-sized area 166 000 86
Forli IT512 Medium-sized area 173 000 69
Gallarate IT068 Medium-sized area 102 000 48
Gela IT069 Small area 76 000 95
Genoa IT006 Metropolitan area 646 000 81
Grosseto IT520 Small area 95 000 83
L'Aquila IT526 Small area 94 000 70
La Spezia IT036 Medium-sized area 186 000 44
Latina IT513 Medium-sized area 182 000 65
Lecce IT037 Medium-sized area 229 000 38
Lecco IT060 Medium-sized area 138 000 33
Livorno IT504 Medium-sized area 170 000 83
Massa IT047 Small area 76 000 89
Matera IT054 Small area 76 000 78
Messina IT501 Metropolitan area 237 000 86
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Milan IT002 Large metropolitan area 4 769 000 31
Modena IT030 Metropolitan area 367 000 48
Naples IT003 Large metropolitan area 3 288 000 31
Novara IT516 Medium-sized area 160 000 63
Padua IT028 Metropolitan area 533 000 38
Palermo IT005 Metropolitan area 959 000 70
Parma IT503 Metropolitan area 330 000 54
Pavia IT046 Medium-sized area 134 000 49
Perugia IT016 Metropolitan area 287 000 57
Pesaro IT039 Medium-sized area 129 000 73
Pescara IT019 Medium-sized area 219 000 49
Piacenza IT033 Medium-sized area 203 000 50
Pisa IT041 Medium-sized area 186 000 45
Pordenone IT058 Medium-sized area 143 000 35
Potenza IT023 Medium-sized area 129 000 50
Prato IT502 Metropolitan area 275 000 69
Ragusa IT523 Small area 79 000 84
Ravenna IT506 Medium-sized area 178 000 86
Reggio di Calabria IT025 Medium-sized area 197 000 84
Reggio nell'Emilia IT505 Metropolitan area 284 000 60
Rimini IT508 Metropolitan area 246 000 57
Rome IT001 Large metropolitan area 4 131 000 64
Salerno IT032 Metropolitan area 246 000 51
Sassari IT026 Medium-sized area 209 000 58
Sassuolo IT073 Small area 94 000 38
Savona IT052 Medium-sized area 91 000 56
Siracusa IT509 Medium-sized area 169 000 63
Taranto IT022 Metropolitan area 398 000 44
Terni IT515 Medium-sized area 173 000 63
Toast IT521 Medium-sized area 152 000 53
Trani IT525 Small area 49 000 100
Trapani IT522 Medium-sized area 115 000 56
Trent IT014 Medium-sized area 236 000 50
Treviso IT042 Medium-sized area 196 000 40
Trieste IT015 Medium-sized area 207 000 86
Turin IT004 Large metropolitan area 1 740 000 48
Udine IT035 Medium-sized area 237 000 41
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Varese IT043 Medium-sized area 191 000 40
Venice IT011 Metropolitan area 514 000 45
Verona IT012 Metropolitan area 506 000 49
Vicenza IT514 Medium-sized area 236 000 47
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Japan
Note: This map is for illustrative purposes and is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory covered by
these maps.
The population grid used to create the FUAs in Japan is the 2015 Global Human Settlement (GHS) grid. The geographic
building blocks are the cities (Shi), towns (Machi) and villages (Mura). Commuting data comes from the 2015 Census.
Table 1. List of functional urban areas
FUA name FUA code Size class Population in 2015 (GHS)
Share of population living in the city (%)
Akita JPN43 Metropolitan area 377 000 79
Aomori JPN51 Metropolitan area 289 000 94
Asahikawa JPN44 Metropolitan area 383 000 88
Ashikaga JPN57 Medium-sized area 222 000 84
Fuji JPN46 Metropolitan area 382 000 98
Fujieda JPN38 Metropolitan area 448 000 67
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Fukui JPN32 Metropolitan area 535 000 47
Fukuoka JPN04 Large metropolitan area 2 566 000 92
Fukushima JPN39 Metropolitan area 437 000 64
Hachinohe JPN49 Metropolitan area 300 000 71
Hakodate JPN48 Metropolitan area 322 000 77
Hamamatsu JPN14 Metropolitan area 945 000 68
Himeji JPN20 Metropolitan area 685 000 78
Hiroshima JPN08 Metropolitan area 1 391 000 96
Hitachi JPN50 Metropolitan area 311 000 59
Isesaki JPN47 Metropolitan area 374 000 100
Kagoshima JPN19 Metropolitan area 670 000 83
Kanazawa JPN17 Metropolitan area 723 000 78
Kitakyushu JPN09 Metropolitan area 1 279 000 73
Kochi JPN35 Metropolitan area 484 000 65
Kofu JPN27 Metropolitan area 578 000 52
Koriyama JPN34 Metropolitan area 507 000 65
Kumamoto JPN11 Metropolitan area 1 124 000 74
Kurume JPN42 Metropolitan area 408 000 72
Kusatsu JPN45 Metropolitan area 384 000 72
Kushiro JPN60 Medium-sized area 196 000 85
Marugame JPN59 Medium-sized area 205 000 58
Matsumoto JPN40 Metropolitan area 416 000 57
Matsuyama JPN25 Metropolitan area 598 000 97
Mito JPN21 Metropolitan area 699 000 60
Miyazaki JPN36 Metropolitan area 478 000 80
Morioka JPN37 Metropolitan area 449 000 64
Nagano JPN29 Metropolitan area 566 000 65
Nagasaki JPN24 Metropolitan area 575 000 77
Nagoya JPN03 Large metropolitan area 8 532 000 88
Naha JPN10 Metropolitan area 1 133 000 72
Niigata JPN15 Metropolitan area 772 000 45
Numazu JPN31 Metropolitan area 541 000 85
Obihiro JPN53 Metropolitan area 253 000 64
Oita JPN18 Metropolitan area 704 000 81
Okayama JPN07 Large metropolitan area 1 487 000 78
Omuta JPN58 Medium-sized area 220 000 54
Osaka JPN02 Large metropolitan area 16 694 000 93
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Sapporo JPN05 Large metropolitan area 2 099 000 93
Sendai JPN06 Metropolitan area 1 480 000 81
Shimonoseki JPN52 Metropolitan area 251 000 100
Shizuoka JPN22 Metropolitan area 676 000 100
Shunan JPN54 Metropolitan area 235 000 79
Takamatsu JPN28 Metropolitan area 547 000 72
Takasaki JPN13 Metropolitan area 1 053 000 76
Tokushima JPN30 Metropolitan area 554 000 54
Tokyo JPN01 Large metropolitan area 35 714 000 94
Tomakomai JPN61 Medium-sized area 163 000 100
Toyama JPN26 Metropolitan area 572 000 71
Toyohashi JPN23 Metropolitan area 669 000 83
Ube JPN55 Medium-sized area 210 000 72
Utsunomiya JPN16 Metropolitan area 873 000 57
Wakayama JPN33 Metropolitan area 518 000 77
Yamagata JPN41 Metropolitan area 406 000 59
Yokkaichi JPN12 Metropolitan area 1 035 000 76
Yonago JPN56 Medium-sized area 220 000 64
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Korea
Note: This map is for illustrative purposes and is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory covered by
these maps.
The population grid used to create the FUAs in Korea is the 2015 Global Human Settlement (GHS) grid. The geographic
building blocks are the cities (Si), counties (Gun) and districts (Gu). Commuting data comes from the 2015 Census.
Table 1. List of functional urban areas
FUA name FUA code Size class Population in 2015 (GHS)
Share of population living in the city (%)
Chuncheon KOR18 Metropolitan area 282 000 100
Dalseong KOR03 Large metropolitan area 2 213 000 100
Deokjin KOR09 Metropolitan area 754 000 87
Gangneung KOR21 Medium-sized area 197 000 100
Gimhae KOR02 Large metropolitan area 4 313 000 92
Gumi KOR13 Metropolitan area 483 000 76
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Gunsan KOR19 Metropolitan area 257 000 100
Gwangsan KOR04 Large metropolitan area 1 617 000 94
Gyeongsan KOR11 Metropolitan area 582 000 100
Heungdeok KOR08 Metropolitan area 856 000 96
Iksan KOR17 Metropolitan area 298 000 100
Jeju KOR14 Metropolitan area 409 000 100
Jinju KOR15 Metropolitan area 348 000 100
Naju KOR22 Medium-sized area 134 000 100
Pohan KOR12 Metropolitan area 471 000 100
Sebuk KOR10 Metropolitan area 637 000 100
Seo KOR05 Metropolitan area 1 598 000 100
Seongsan KOR06 Metropolitan area 1 063 000 79
Seoul KOR01 Large metropolitan area 23 827 000 92
Suncheon KOR20 Metropolitan area 239 000 100
Ulsan KOR07 Metropolitan area 903 000 100
Wonju KOR16 Metropolitan area 345 000 100
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Lithuania
Note: This map is for illustrative purposes and is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory covered by
these maps.
The population grid used to create the FUAs in Lithuania is the 2011 Geostat grid. The geographic building blocks are the
LAU-1 units.
Table 1. List of functional urban areas
FUA name FUA code Size class Population in 2015 (GHS)
Share of population living in the city (%)
Alytus LT004 Small area 65 000 100
Kaunas LT002 Metropolitan area 303 000 100
Klaipeda LT501 Medium-sized area 137 000 100
Panevezys LT003 Medium-sized area 101 000 100
Siauliai LT502 Small area 98 000 100
Vilnius LT001 Metropolitan area 549 000 100
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Luxembourg
Note: This map is for illustrative purposes and is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory covered by
these maps.
The population grid used to create the FUAs in Luxembourg is the 2011 Geostat grid. The geographic building blocks are the
LAU-2 units.
Table 1. List of functional urban areas
FUA name FUA code Size class Population in 2015 (GHS)
Share of population living in the city (%)
Luxembourg LU001 Metropolitan area 565 000 19
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Latvia
Note: This map is for illustrative purposes and is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory covered by
these maps.
The population grid used to create the FUAs in Latvia is the 2011 Geostat grid. The geographic building blocks are the LAU-
2 units. Commuting data comes from the 2011 Census.
Table 1. List of functional urban areas
FUA name FUA code Size class Population in 2015 (GHS)
Share of population living in the city (%)
Daugavpils LV501 Medium-sized area 122 000 79
Jelgava LV003 Small area 89 000 63
Liepaja LV002 Small area 97 000 74
Riga LV001 Metropolitan area 901 000 69
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Mexico
Note: This map is for illustrative purposes and is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory covered by
these maps.
The population grid used to create the FUAs in Mexico is the 2015 Global Human Settlement (GHS) grid. The geographic
building blocks are the Municipios. Commuting data comes from the 2015 Mexican Inter-Census Survey.
Table 1. List of functional urban areas
FUA name FUA code Size class Population in 2015 (GHS)
Share of population living in the city (%)
Acapulco de Juarez MEX22 Metropolitan area 879 000 100
Acuna MEX86 Medium-sized area 153 000 100
Aguascalientes MEX21 Metropolitan area 902 000 100
Ahome MEX34 Metropolitan area 568 000 81
Apatzingan MEX89 Medium-sized area 135 000 100
Apizaco MEX70 Medium-sized area 204 000 57
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Benito Juarez MEX28 Metropolitan area 783 000 100
Cajeme MEX41 Metropolitan area 460 000 100
Campeche MEX58 Metropolitan area 284 000 100
Carmen MEX64 Metropolitan area 242 000 100
Celaya MEX29 Metropolitan area 696 000 78
Chiautla MEX92 Small area 66 000 100
Chihuahua MEX18 Metropolitan area 912 000 100
Chilpancingo de los Bravo
MEX53 Metropolitan area 348 000 81
Ciudad Valles MEX75 Medium-sized area 184 000 100
Coatzacoalcos MEX44 Metropolitan area 371 000 91
Colima MEX56 Metropolitan area 315 000 100
Comitan de Dominguez MEX82 Medium-sized area 169 000 100
Cordoba MEX48 Metropolitan area 358 000 80
Cuauhtemoc MEX77 Medium-sized area 182 000 100
Cuautla MEX52 Metropolitan area 344 000 57
Cuernavaca MEX14 Metropolitan area 1 035 000 87
Culiacan MEX16 Metropolitan area 954 000 100
Delicias MEX83 Medium-sized area 154 000 100
Durango MEX30 Metropolitan area 661 000 100
Ensenada MEX36 Metropolitan area 536 000 100
Fresnillo MEX67 Medium-sized area 239 000 100
Guadalajara MEX02 Large metropolitan area 5 265 000 81
Guadalupe MEX43 Metropolitan area 437 000 80
Hermosillo MEX20 Metropolitan area 899 000 100
Hidalgo del Parral MEX91 Medium-sized area 114 000 100
Iguala de la Independencia
MEX85 Medium-sized area 158 000 100
Irapuato MEX33 Metropolitan area 634 000 98
Juarez MEX10 Metropolitan area 1 386 000 100
La Paz MEX57 Metropolitan area 295 000 100
Lagos de Moreno MEX80 Medium-sized area 175 000 100
Lazaro Cardenas MEX74 Medium-sized area 200 000 100
Leon MEX07 Large metropolitan area 1 658 000 100
Los Cabos MEX55 Metropolitan area 352 000 100
Matamoros MEX35 Metropolitan area 532 000 100
Mazatlan MEX40 Metropolitan area 480 000 100
Merida MEX09 Large metropolitan area 1 484 000 69
Mexicali MEX13 Metropolitan area 1 044 000 100
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Mexico City MEX01 Large metropolitan area 20 554 000 98
Minatitlan MEX51 Metropolitan area 352 000 86
Monclova MEX54 Metropolitan area 323 000 100
Monterrey MEX03 Large metropolitan area 5 357 000 96
Morelia MEX17 Metropolitan area 972 000 82
Navojoa MEX78 Medium-sized area 176 000 100
Nogales MEX65 Medium-sized area 248 000 100
Nuevo Laredo MEX42 Metropolitan area 426 000 100
Oaxaca de Juarez MEX24 Metropolitan area 876 000 64
Orizaba MEX39 Metropolitan area 512 000 57
Othon P. Blanco MEX66 Metropolitan area 239 000 100
Pachuca de Soto MEX32 Metropolitan area 703 000 73
Piedras Negras MEX81 Medium-sized area 168 000 100
Poza Rica de Hidalgo MEX37 Metropolitan area 539 000 37
Puebla MEX04 Large metropolitan area 2 705 000 89
Puerto Vallarta MEX59 Metropolitan area 303 000 100
Queretaro MEX08 Large metropolitan area 1 588 000 69
Reynosa MEX25 Metropolitan area 855 000 84
Salamanca MEX60 Metropolitan area 298 000 100
Saltillo MEX27 Metropolitan area 827 000 100
San Cristobal de las Casas
MEX68 Medium-sized area 212 000 100
San Francisco del Rincon
MEX72 Medium-sized area 216 000 100
San Juan del Rio MEX61 Metropolitan area 290 000 100
San Luis Potosi MEX11 Metropolitan area 1 368 000 85
San Luis Rio Colorado MEX71 Medium-sized area 207 000 100
San Martin Texmelucan MEX73 Medium-sized area 207 000 78
Solidaridad MEX69 Medium-sized area 222 000 100
Tampico MEX23 Metropolitan area 850 000 100
Tapachula MEX45 Metropolitan area 369 000 100
Tehuacan MEX50 Metropolitan area 345 000 86
Tepic MEX38 Metropolitan area 500 000 88
Teziutlan MEX88 Medium-sized area 135 000 100
Tianguistenco MEX76 Medium-sized area 185 000 97
Tijuana MEX06 Large metropolitan area 1 753 000 100
Tlaxcala MEX47 Metropolitan area 357 000 73
Toluca MEX05 Large metropolitan area 2 389 000 64
Torreon MEX12 Metropolitan area 1 248 000 100
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Tulancingo de Bravo MEX63 Metropolitan area 290 000 61
Tuxpan MEX84 Medium-sized area 156 000 100
Tuxtla Gutierrez MEX31 Metropolitan area 625 000 100
Uriangato MEX87 Medium-sized area 153 000 79
Uruapan MEX49 Metropolitan area 366 000 100
Veracruz MEX19 Metropolitan area 915 000 82
Victoria MEX46 Metropolitan area 363 000 100
Villahermosa MEX15 Metropolitan area 1 050 000 72
Xalapa MEX26 Metropolitan area 846 000 67
Zamora MEX62 Metropolitan area 279 000 75
Zapotlan el Grande MEX90 Medium-sized area 124 000 87
Zitacuaro MEX79 Medium-sized area 181 000 100
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Netherlands
Note: This map is for illustrative purposes and is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory covered by
these maps.
The population grid used to create the FUAs in the Netherlands is the 2011 Geostat grid. The geographic building blocks are
the LAU-2 units. Commuting data comes from the 2011 Census.
Table 1. List of functional urban areas
FUA name FUA code Size class Population in 2015 (GHS)
Share of population living in the city (%)
Alkmaar NL514 Metropolitan area 290 000 62
Almelo NL519 Medium-sized area 153 000 47
Alphen aan den Rijn NL026 Medium-sized area 107 000 100
Amersfoort NL504 Medium-sized area 177 000 82
Amsterdam NL002 Large metropolitan area 2 750 000 73
Apeldoorn NL014 Medium-sized area 235 000 66
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Arnhem NL009 Metropolitan area 420 000 39
Assen NL522 Medium-sized area 130 000 54
Bergen op Zoom NL028 Medium-sized area 113 000 58
Breda NL012 Metropolitan area 367 000 48
Deventer NL513 Medium-sized area 119 000 84
Ede NL512 Medium-sized area 153 000 100
Eindhoven NL005 Metropolitan area 734 000 48
Enschede NL008 Metropolitan area 402 000 59
Gouda NL030 Small area 63 000 100
Greater Soest NL529 Small area 68 000 100
Groningen NL007 Metropolitan area 471 000 41
Heerlen NL010 Metropolitan area 287 000 69
Leeuwarden NL015 Medium-sized area 209 000 57
Leiden NL507 Metropolitan area 338 000 73
Lelystad NL520 Medium-sized area 122 000 65
Maastricht NL505 Medium-sized area 179 000 68
Middelburg NL032 Medium-sized area 113 000 81
Nijmegen NL013 Metropolitan area 323 000 51
Oss NL521 Medium-sized area 133 000 67
Roosendaal NL020 Medium-sized area 132 000 60
Rotterdam NL003 Large metropolitan area 1 811 000 73
Sittard-Geleen NL016 Medium-sized area 169 000 69
The Hague NL001 Metropolitan area 1 045 000 78
Tilburg NL006 Metropolitan area 309 000 67
Utrecht NL004 Metropolitan area 877 000 49
Veenendaal NL524 Small area 83 000 71
Venlo NL515 Medium-sized area 197 000 49
Zwolle NL511 Metropolitan area 353 000 35
s-Hertogenbosch NL503 Metropolitan area 273 000 56
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Norway
Note: This map is for illustrative purposes and is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory covered by
these maps.
The population grid used to create the FUAs in Norway is the 2011 Geostat grid. The geographic building blocks are the LAU-
2 units.
Table 1. List of functional urban areas
FUA name FUA code Size class Population in 2015 (GHS)
Share of population living in the city (%)
Bergen NO002 Metropolitan area 380 000 68
Kristiansand NO005 Medium-sized area 149 000 54
Oslo NO001 Metropolitan area 1 305 000 48
Stavanger NO004 Metropolitan area 310 000 42
Tromso NO006 Small area 47 000 96
Trondheim NO003 Metropolitan area 271 000 67
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Poland
Note: This map is for illustrative purposes and is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory covered by
these maps.
The population grid used to create the FUAs in Poland is the 2011 Geostat grid. The geographic building blocks are the LAU-
2 units.
Table 1. List of functional urban areas
FUA name FUA code Size class Population in 2015 (GHS)
Share of population living in the city (%)
Bialystok PL011 Metropolitan area 424 000 70
Bielsko-Biala PL506 Metropolitan area 361 000 48
Bydgoszcz PL008 Metropolitan area 504 000 70
Chelm PL042 Small area 88 000 70
Cracow PL003 Metropolitan area 1 388 000 54
Czestochowa PL024 Metropolitan area 402 000 57
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Elblag PL512 Medium-sized area 158 000 10
Elk PL052 Small area 72 000 84
Gdansk PL006 Metropolitan area 1 127 000 62
Glogow PL044 Medium-sized area 104 000 63
Gniezno PL037 Medium-sized area 106 000 64
Gorzow Wielkopolski PL017 Medium-sized area 162 000 75
Grudziadz PL517 Medium-sized area 127 000 14
Inowroclaw PL035 Small area 87 000 84
Jastrzebie Zdroj PL030 Medium-sized area 191 000 77
Jelenia Gora PL019 Medium-sized area 138 000 60
Kalisz PL027 Medium-sized area 212 000 48
Katowice PL010 Large metropolitan area 2 553 000 55
Kielce PL012 Metropolitan area 398 000 50
Konin PL022 Medium-sized area 170 000 44
Koszalin PL028 Medium-sized area 56 000 13
Legnica PL516 Medium-sized area 133 000 77
Leszno PL048 Medium-sized area 115 000 56
Lodz PL002 Metropolitan area 919 000 83
Lomza PL047 Small area 88 000 24
Lubin PL033 Medium-sized area 117 000 69
Lublin PL009 Metropolitan area 674 000 51
Nowy Sacz PL020 Metropolitan area 266 000 32
Olsztyn PL014 Metropolitan area 260 000 66
Opole PL016 Medium-sized area 252 000 52
Ostrow Wielkopolski PL039 Medium-sized area 140 000 50
Ostrowiec Swietokrzyski PL036 Medium-sized area 116 000 61
Pabianice PL043 Small area 95 000 67
Pila PL034 Small area 91 000 81
Piotrkow Trybunalski PL032 Medium-sized area 146 000 50
Plock PL026 Medium-sized area 222 000 54
Poznan PL005 Metropolitan area 975 000 56
Przemysl PL040 Medium-sized area 123 000 13
Radom PL025 Metropolitan area 285 000 74
Rybnik PL508 Medium-sized area 138 000 100
Rzeszow PL015 Metropolitan area 503 000 40
Siedlce PL031 Medium-sized area 142 000 12
Slupsk PL029 Medium-sized area 166 000 10
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Stalowa Wola PL045 Medium-sized area 192 000 34
Stargard Szczecinski PL038 Small area 73 000 8
Suwalki PL021 Small area 86 000 17
Swidnica PL049 Small area 107 000 55
Szczecin PL007 Metropolitan area 72 000 8
Tarnow PL514 Metropolitan area 307 000 11
Tczew PL051 Small area 79 000 74
Tomaszow Mazowiecki PL046 Small area 74 000 83
Torun PL013 Metropolitan area 323 000 62
Walbrzych PL511 Medium-sized area 254 000 77
Warsaw PL001 Large metropolitan area 3 087 000 55
Wloclawek PL513 Medium-sized area 182 000 5
Wroclaw PL004 Metropolitan area 855 000 73
Zamosc PL041 Medium-sized area 138 000 18
Zielona Gora PL018 Medium-sized area 213 000 65
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Portugal
Note: This map is for illustrative purposes and is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory covered by
these maps.
The population grid used to create the FUAs in Portugal is the 2011 Geostat grid. The geographic building blocks are the LAU-
1 units. Commuting data comes from the 2011 Census.
Table 1. List of functional urban areas
FUA name FUA code Size class Population in 2015 (GHS)
Share of population living in the city (%)
Aveiro PT008 Medium-sized area 140 000 55
Braga PT003 Medium-sized area 249 000 74
Coimbra PT005 Metropolitan area 272 000 51
Faro PT009 Medium-sized area 122 000 53
Funchal PT004 Medium-sized area 215 000 51
Guimaraes PT505 Medium-sized area 177 000 87
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Lisbon PT001 Large metropolitan area 2 917 000 64
Ponta Delgada PT007 Medium-sized area 116 000 54
Porto PT002 Metropolitan area 1 268 000 81
Povoa de Varzim PT019 Small area 63 000 100
Viana do Castelo PT016 Small area 87 000 100
Vila Franca de Xira PT508 Medium-sized area 121 000 100
Viseu PT014 Medium-sized area 111 000 89
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Slovak Republic
Note: This map is for illustrative purposes and is without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory covered by
these maps.
The population grid used to create the FUAs in Slovak Republic is the 2011 Geostat grid. The geographic building blocks are
the LAU-2 units.
Table 1. List of functional urban areas
FUA name FUA code Size class Population in 2015 (GHS)
Share of population living in the city (%)
Banska Bystrica SK003 Medium-sized area 78 000 100
Bratislava SK001 Metropolitan area 406 000 100
Kosice SK002 Metropolitan area 245 000 100
Nitra SK004 Medium-sized area 75 000 100
Presov SK005 Medium-sized area 91 000 100
Trencin SK008 Medium-sized area 55 000 100
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
[email protected] Version: November 2020
Functional urban areas http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy
Trnava SK007 Medium-sized area 62 000 100
Zilina SK006 Medium-sized area 80 000 100
mailto:[email protected]://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy