Upload
amandeep-kaur-sethi
View
21
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
What Does - BRIC Mean?
"The term 'BRIC' (BRAZIL, RUSSIA, INDIA, CHINA) was coined by Jim
O'Neill [Goldman Sachs' London-based head of global economic research] at
Goldman Sachs in November 2001," says Maria Gordon, speaking on a July 25
conference call. Gordon, based in London, is a portfolio manager for the new
BRIC fund, and executive director and co-head of GSAM's global emerging
markets equity. The other portfolio managers for the BRIC fund are: Singapore-
based Kenny Tjan, executive director and co-head of GSAM's global emerging
markets equity; Richard Flax executive director, global emerging markets equity,
London; and Mark Syn, executive director, global emerging markets equity,
Singapore.
At the end of the nineties, the emerging markets attracted attention mainly through
a series of crises. In 1994, Mexico was shaken by the so-called “Tequila crisis”,
and in 1997-98, the booming Tiger countries in Asia were hit. Then in early 1999,
Russia declared insolvency and in the same year Brazil just managed to escape the
bankruptcy of the state. Finally, in 2001 the financial and currency systems in
Argentina collapsed. In most cases, the economic crises were only of short
duration. Today most of the former Tiger countries are no longer counted as
developing countries. They have outgrown this state and are now viewed as
industrialised countries. Much the same applies to Mexico. An aspect of
importance for future developments is the fact that the crises concerned frequently
triggered sweeping reforms, and not just in the countries directly affected! In
recent years, BRIC countries have, for example, built up substantial foreign-
exchange reserves thanks to large trade surpluses. Russia and Brazil have
improved their debt structures and China is in the process of significantly
deregulating its currency and share trading systems. These factors are also
reflected in higher credit ratings of rating agencies. Three of these four countries
already have a prized investment grade rating.
2
Younger populations and new pools of consumers are helping drive interest in
BRIC investing. According to GSAM, the pool of new consumers in BRIC
countries with annual incomes of above $15,000 will, by 2025, be almost twice the
total population of Japan, three times the total population of Germany, and four
times the total population of the U.K., France, or Italy. The four countries form
natural markets for each other: "China and India are key sources of demand for
natural resources; Russia and Brazil are key sources of supply for natural
resources," explains Gordon, adding that BRIC countries contributed one-third of
global growth in past five yrs, according to Jim O'Neill.
With valuations more modest since the emerging markets' sell off this year,
Gordon asserts that Ex-India, (which at 19.9 times earnings still has relatively high
P/E multiples), BRIC markets have more attractive fundamentals than the U.S.,
Europe, or Japan markets. She calls BRIC a "very profitable slice of the universe."
Including India, the P/E ratio for BRICs is 11.8 times earnings, while the U.S. is
16.8 and Japan is 19, according to GSAM.
The BRIC fund is designed to be part of a core and satellite approach to asset
management with the BRIC fund one of the satellites complementing a "core" of
more diverse equity and fixed-income assets. Because it will invest in a relatively
low number of companies, the BRIC fund is considered more concentrated than
many emerging markets funds, and may be more volatile as well. Emerging
markets funds have an average volatility of around 20% while the BRIC fund may
have closer to 25% volatility, according to Gordon
Feature of BRIC COUNTRY
The development model of the other BRIC countries seems to have different
drivers, much more influenced by natural resources in the case of Russia and
Brazil, while India is testing its own version of economic development with a
strong component of outsourced services. This new dimension of growth in
services rather than manufacturing has been made possible by the advent of the
internet and the huge reduction in communication costs linked to it. These new
3
models for growth have been untested over long periods but may prove to be other
pathways for achieving growth
1. Swiftly growing economies
2. Giant countries, with giant populations,
3. LOW cost of production
4. More visibility OF INCOME GROWTHS
BRIC leaders in 2008: Manmohan Singh (India), Dmitry Medvedev (Russia), Hu
Jintao (China) and Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (Brazil).
In economics, BRIC or BRICs is an acronym that refers to the fast growing
developing economies of Brazil, Russia, India, and China. The acronym was first
coined and prominently used by Goldman Sachs in 2001. Goldman Sachs argued
that, since they are developing rapidly, by 2050 the combined economies of the
BRICs could eclipse the combined economies of the current richest countries of
the world.
Goldman Sachs did not argue that the BRICs would organize themselves into an
economic bloc, or a formal trading association, like the European Union has done.
However, there are strong indications that the "four BRIC countries have been
seeking to form a "political club" or "alliance", and thereby converting "their
growing economic power into greater geopolitical clout". One of the recent
4
indications was from a BRIC Summit meeting in 2008, in the Russian city of
Yekaterinburg between the foreign ministers of the BRIC countries. Also in his
Latin America trip Russian President Dmitry Medvedev while visiting Brazil, met
with Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva and agreed to visa-free travel.
Medvedev has also recently made a trip to New Delhi, India to meet with Indian
President, Prathiba Patil and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh to discuss a nuclear
deal as well as agreeing to cooperate in the spheres of finance and financial
security, tourism, culture and fighting drug trafficking.
5
The BRIC thesis
São Paulo,Brazil.
Goldman Sachs argues that the economic potential of Brazil, Russia, India, and
China is such that they may become among the four most dominant economies by
the year 2050. These countries encompass over twenty-five percent of the world's
land coverage, forty percent of the world's population and hold a combined GDP
(PPP) of 15.435 trillion dollars. On almost every scale, they would be the largest
entity on the global stage. These four countries are among the biggest and fastest
growing Emerging Markets.
The size of the world stock market is estimated at about $36.6 trillion US at the
beginning of October 2008. The total world derivatives market has been estimated
at about $791 trillion face or nominal value, 11 times the size of the entire world
economy. The value of the derivatives market, because it is stated in terms of
notional values, cannot be directly compared to a stock or a fixed income security,
which traditionally refers to an actual value. Moreover, the vast majority of
derivatives 'cancel' each other out (i.e., a derivative 'bet' on an event occurring is
offset by a comparable derivative 'bet' on the event not occurring.). Many such
relatively illiquid securities are valued as marked to model, rather than an actual
market price.)
6
The BRIC term
The Sao Paulo Stock Exchange is the second largest in the Americas and the third
largest in the world
Various sources refer to a purported "original" BRIC agreement that predates the
Goldman Sachs thesis. Some of these sources claim that President Vladimir Putin
of Russia was the driving force behind this original cooperative coalition of
developing BRIC countries. However, thus far, no text has been made public of
any formal agreement to which all four BRIC states are signatories. This does not
mean, however, that they have not reached a multitude of bilateral or even
trilateral agreements. Evidence of agreements of this type are abundant and are
available on the foreign ministry websites of each of the four countries. Trilateral
agreements and frameworks made among the BRICs include the Shanghai
Cooperation Organization (member states include Russia and China, associate
members include India) and the IBSA Trilateral Forum, which unites Brazil, India,
and South Africa in annual dialogues. Also important to note is the G-20 coalition
of developing states which includes all the BRICs.
Also, because of the popularity of the Goldman Sachs thesis "BRIC", this term has
sometimes been extended to "BRICK" (K for South Korea), "BRIMC" (M for
Mexico), "BRICA" (GCC Arab countries – Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait, Bahrain,
Oman and the United Arab Emirates) and "BRICET" (including Eastern Europe
and Turkey) have become more generic marketing terms to refer to these emerging
markets.
7
Marketing
The BRIC term is also used by companies who refer to the four named countries as key
to their emerging markets strategies. By comparison the reduced acronym IC would not
be attractive, although the term "Chindia" is often used. The BRIC's study specifically
focuses on large countries, not necessarily the wealthiest or the most productive and was
never intended to be an investment thesis. If investors read the Goldman's research
carefully, and agreed with the conclusions, then they would gain exposure to Asian debt
and equity markets rather than to Latin America. According to estimates provided by the
USDA, the wealthiest regions outside of the G6 in 2015 will be Hong Kong, South
Korea and Singapore. Combined with China and India, these five economies are likely
to be the world's five most influential economies outside of the G6.
On the other hand, when the "R" in BRIC is extended beyond Russia and is used
as a loose term to include all of Eastern Europe as well, then the BRIC story
becomes more compelling. At issue are the multiple serious problems which
confront Russia (declining population, potentially unstable government,
environmental degradation, critical lack of modern infrastructure, etc), and the
comparatively much lower growth rate seen in Brazil. However, Brazil's lower
growth rate obscures the fact that the country is wealthier than China or India on a
per-capita basis, has a more developed and global integrated financial system and
has an economy potentially more diverse than the other BRICs due to its raw
material and manufacturing potential. Many other Eastern European countries,
such as Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria, and
several others were able to continually sustain high economic growth rates and do
not experience some of the problems that Russia experiences or experience them
to a lesser extent. In terms of GDP per capita in 2007, Brazil ranks 64th, Russia
54th, China 105th and India 131st. By comparison South Korea currently ranks
28th, Singapore 21st, and Hong Kong 27th.
8
WHAT IS EQUITY MARKET?
A stock market, or equity market, is a private or public market for the trading of
company stock and derivatives at an agreed price; these are securities listed on a
stock exchange as well as those only traded privately.
The size of the world stock market is estimated at about $36.6 trillion US at the
beginning of October 2008. The total world derivatives market has been estimated
at about $791 trillion face or nominal value, 11 times the size of the entire world
economy. The value of the derivatives market, because it is stated in terms of
notional values, cannot be directly compared to a stock or a fixed income security,
which traditionally refers to an actual value. Moreover, the vast majority of
derivatives 'cancel' each other out (i.e., a derivative 'bet' on an event occurring is
offset by a comparable derivative 'bet' on the event not occurring.). Many such
relatively illiquid securities are valued as marked to model, rather than an actual
market price.)
The stocks are listed and traded on stock exchanges which are entities a
corporation or mutual organization specialized in the business of bringing buyers
and sellers of the organizations to a listing of stocks and securities together. The
stock market in the United States includes the trading of all securities listed on the
NYSE, the NASDAQ, the Amex, as well as on the many regional exchanges, e.g.
OTCBB and Pink Sheets. European examples of stock exchanges include the
London Stock Exchange, the Deutsche Börse and the Paris Bourse, now part of
Euronext.
9
CORRELATION
Correlation in statistics, refer to relationship between any two, or more variables
viz. height and weight, rainfall and yield, price and demand.
Two variables are said to be correlated if with a change in the value of one
variable there arises a change in the value of another variable. On the other hand if
a change in the value of one variable does not bring any change in the value of the
another variable, the two variable are said to have no relation with each other.
DEFINITION
According to CROXTON and COWDEN "When the relationship is of a
quantitative nature, the appropriate tool for discovering and measuring the
relationship, and expressing it in a brief formula is known as correlation".
According to SIMPSON and KAFKA "Correlation analysis deals with the
association between two or more variables".
Uses of Correlation
1. It is used in deriving precisely the degree , and the direction of relationship
between variables.
2. It is used to developing the concept of regression, and the ratio of variables for
a given value of another variable
3. It is used in reducing the range of uncertainty in the matter of prediction.
4. It is used in presenting the average relationship between any two variables
through a single value of co-efficient of correlation.
5. In the field of economics it is used in understanding the economic behavior,
and locating the important variables on which others depend .
6. In the field of business it is used advantageously to estimate the cost of sales,
volume of sales, sales prices, and any other values on the basis of some other
variable which are financially related to each other.
10
7. In the field of science and philosophy , also the method of correlation are used
in making progressive developments in the respective lines.
CORRELATION FINANCIAL
The relationship between two variables during a period of time, especially one that
shows a close match between the variables' movements. For example, all utility
stocks tend to have a high degree of correlation because their share prices are
influenced by the same forces. Conversely, gold stock price movements are not
closely correlated with utility stock price movements because the two are
influenced by very different factors. The concept of correlation is frequently used
in portfolio analysis.
In investment terms, correlation is the extent to which the values of different types
of investments move in tandem with one another in response to changing
economic and market conditions.
Correlation is measured on a scale of - 1 to +1. Investments with a correlation of +
0.5 or more tend to rise and fall in value at the same time. Investments with a
negative correlation of - 0.5 to - 1 are more likely to gain or lose value in opposing
cycles.
11
INTRODUCTION TO BRIC COUNTRIES
India
Flag National Emblem
CapitalNew Delhi
‡ ) 28°34′N 77°12′E 28.567°N 77.2°E
Official languages Hindi, English
Government Federal republicParliamentary democracy [8]
- President Pratibha Patil
- Prime Minister Manmohan Singh
- Chief Justice K. G. Balakrishnan
Legislature Sansad
12
- Upper House Rajya Sabha
- Lower House Lok Sabha
Independence from United Kingdom
- Declared 15 August 1947
- Republic 26 January 1950
Area
- Total 3,287,240 ‡ km 2 (7th)1,269,210 sq mi
Population
- 2008 estimate 1,147,995,904 (2nd)
- 2001 census 1,028,610,328
GDP (nominal) 2007 estimate
- Total $1.100 trillion (12th)
- Per capita $941 (132nd)
Currency Indian rupee (₨) (INR)India, officially the Republic of India (Hindi: भारत गणराज्य Bhārat Gaṇarājya;
see also other Indian languages), is a country in South Asia. It is the seventh-
largest country by geographical area, the second-most populous country, and the
most populous democracy in the world. Bounded by the Indian Ocean on the
south, the Arabian Sea on the west, and the Bay of Bengal on the east, India has a
coastline of 7,517 kilometers (4,671 mi). It is bordered by Pakistan to the west;
People's Republic of China (PRC), Nepal, and Bhutan to the north; and
Bangladesh and Myanmar to the east. India is in the vicinity of Sri Lanka, the
Maldives, and Indonesia in the Indian Ocean.
Economy of India
The economy of India was under socialism-based policies for an entire generation
from the 1950s until the 1980s. The economy was characterized by extensive
13
regulation, protectionism, and public ownership, leading to pervasive corruption
and slow growth. Since 1991, the ongoing economic liberalization has moved
India towards a capitalist market economy. It has created millions of better paying
jobs and a fast-growing middle class.
Agriculture provides livelihood for 60% of Indians. The service sector makes up a
further 28% of employment, and industrial sector around 12%.One estimate says
that only one in five job-seekers has had any sort of vocational training. The labor
force totals half a billion workers. For output, the agricultural sector accounts for
17% of GDP; the service and industrial sectors make up 54% and 29%
respectively. Major agricultural products include rice, wheat, oilseed, cotton, jute,
tea, sugarcane, potatoes, cattle, water buffalo, sheep, goats, poultry and fish. Major
industries include textiles, chemicals, food processing, steel, transportation
equipment, cement, mining, petroleum, machinery and software design.
In 2007, India's GDP was $1.237 trillion, which makes it the twelfth-largest
economy in the world or fourth largest by purchasing power adjusted exchange
rates. India's nominal per capita income of $1043 is ranked 136th in the world. In
the late 2000s, India's growth has averaged 7.5% a year, increases which will
double the average income within a decade. Unemployment rate is 7% (2008
estimate).
Indian economic reforms have meant growing trade and globalization. India
currently accounts for 1.5% of World trade as of 2007 according to the WTO.
According to the World Trade Statistics of the WTO in 2006, India's total
merchandise trade (counting exports and imports) was valued at $294 billion in
2006 and India's services trade inclusive of export and import was $143 billion.
Thus, India's global economic engagement in 2006 covering both merchandise and
services trade was of the order of $437 billion, up by a record 72% from a level of
$253 billion in 2004. India's trade has reached a still relatively moderate share
24% of GDP in 2006, up from 6% in 1985.India has economic disparities at the
state level; more market-friendly states have raised living standards faster and
14
higher. Despite sustained high economic growth rate, approximately 80% of
Indian population lives on less than $2 a day (PPP), more than double the same
poverty rate in China Even though the Green Revolution ended famines in India,
40% of children under the age of three are underweight and a third of all men and
women suffer from chronic energy deficiency.
MAIN INDEX OF INDIA
1.BSE
2.NSE
Introduction TO BSE
Bombay Stock Exchange is the oldest stock exchange in Asia with a rich heritage,
now spanning three centuries in its 133 years of existence. What is now popularly
known as BSE was established as "The Native Share & Stock Brokers'
Association" in 1875.
BSE is the first stock exchange in the country which obtained permanent
recognition (in 1956) from the Government of India under the Securities Contracts
(Regulation) Act 1956. BSE's pivotal and pre-eminent role in the development of
the Indian capital market is widely recognized. It migrated from the open outcry
system to an online screen-based order driven trading system in 1995. Earlier an
Association Of Persons (AOP), BSE is now a corporatised and demutualised entity
incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956, pursuant to the
BSE (Corporatisation and Demutualisation) Scheme, 2005 notified by the
Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI). With demutualisation, BSE has
15
two of world's best exchanges, Deutsche Börse and Singapore Exchange, as its
strategic partners.
Today, BSE is the world's number 1 exchange in terms of the number of listed
companies and the world's 5th in transaction numbers. The market capitalization
as on December 31, 2007 stood at USD 1.79 trillion . An investor can choose from
more than 4,700 listed companies, which for easy reference, are classified into A,
B, S, T and Z groups.
BSE 30
ACC Ltd. Cement and cement products
Ambuja Cements Ltd. Cement and Cement Products
Bajaj Auto Ltd. Automobiles - 2 and 3 Wheelers
Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. Electrical Equipment
Bharti Airtel Ltd. Telecommunication - Services
Cipla Ltd. Pharmaceuticals
DLF Ltd. Developers/Construction
Grasim Industries Ltd. Diversified
Housing Development Finance Corporation Ltd. Finance - Housing
HDFC Bank Ltd. Banks
Hindalco Industries Ltd. Aluminium
Hindustan Unilever Ltd. FMCG
ICICI Bank Ltd. Banks
Infosys Technologies Ltd. Information Technology
ITC Ltd. FMCG
Larsen & Toubro Ltd. Engineering
Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. Automobiles - 4 wheelers
Maruti Udyog Ltd. Automobiles - 4 wheelers
NTPC Ltd. Power
Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. Oil Exploration/Production
Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. Pharmaceuticals
16
Reliance Communications Limited Telecom
Reliance Energy Ltd. Power
Reliance Industries Ltd. Refineries
Satyam Computer Services Ltd. Computers - Software
State Bank of India Banks
Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. Computers - Software
Tata Motors Ltd. Automobiles - 4 Wheelers
Wipro Ltd. Computers – Software
NSE
National Stock Exchange of India (NSE) is India's largest Stock Exchange &
World's third largest Stock Exchange in terms of transactions. Located in Mumbai,
NSE was promoted by leading Financial Institutions at the behest of the
Government of India, and was incorporated in November 1992 as a tax-paying
company. In April 1993, NSE was recognized as a Stock exchange under the
Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act-1956. NSE commenced operations in the
Wholesale Debt Market (WDM) segment in June 1994. Capital Market (Equities)
segment of the NSE commenced operations in November 1994, while operations
in the Derivatives segment commenced in June 2000. NSE has played a catalytic
role in reforming Indian securities market in terms of microstructure, market
practices and trading volumes. NSE has set up its trading system as a nation-wide,
fully automated screen based trading system. It has written for itself the mandate
to create World-class Stock Exchange and use it as an instrument of change for the
industry as a whole through competitive pressure. NSE is set up on a demutualised
model wherein the ownership, management and trading rights are in the hands of
three different sets of people. This has completely eliminated any conflict of
interest.
17
50 COMPANIES
ABB Ltd. Electrical equipment
ACC Ltd. Cement and cement products
Ambuja Cements Ltd. Cement and Cement Products
Bajaj Auto Ltd. Automobiles - 2 and 3 Wheelers
Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. Electrical Equipment
Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. Refineries
Bharti Airtel Ltd. Telecommunication - Services
Cipla Ltd. Pharmaceuticals
Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd. Pharmaceuticals
GAIL (India) Ltd. Gas
Glaxosmithkline Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Pharmaceuticals
Grasim Industries Ltd. Cement and Cement Products
HCL Technologies Ltd. Computers - Software
HDFC Bank Ltd. Banks
Hero Honda Motors Ltd. Automobiles - 2 and 3 Wheelers
Hindalco Industries Ltd. Aluminium
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. Refineries
Hindustan Unilever Ltd. Diversified
Housing Development Finance Corporation Ltd. Finance - Housing
I T C Ltd. Cigarettes
ICICI Bank Ltd. Banks
Infosys Technologies Ltd. Computers - Software
Larsen & Toubro Ltd. Engineering
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. Telecommunication - Services
Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. Automobiles - 4 wheelers
Maruti Udyog Ltd. Automobiles - 4 wheelers
NTPC Ltd. Power
National Aluminium Co. Ltd. Aluminium
18
Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. Oil Exploration/Production
Punjab National Bank Banks
Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. Pharmaceuticals
Reliance Communications Ltd. Telecommunication - Services
Reliance Energy Ltd. Power
Reliance Industries Ltd. Refineries
Reliance Petroleum Ltd. Refineries
Satyam Computer Services Ltd. Computers - Software
Siemens Ltd. Electrical Equipment
State Bank of India Banks
Steel Authority of India Ltd. Steel and Steel Products
Sterlite Industries (India) Ltd. Metals
Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. Pharmaceuticals
Suzlon Energy Ltd. Electrical Equipment
Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. Computers - Software
Tata Motors Ltd. Automobiles - 4 Wheelers
Tata Power Co. Ltd. Power
Tata Steel Ltd. Steel and Steel Products
Unitech Ltd. Construction
Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Telecommunication - Services
Wipro Ltd. Computers - Software
Zee Entertainment Enterprises Ltd. Media & Entertainmen
19
China
People's Republic of China
Zhōnghuá Rénmín Gònghéguó
Flag Emblem
CapitalBeijing
39°55′N 116°23′E 39.917°N 116.383°E
Ethnic groups
91.9% Han, 1.30% Zhuang, 0.86% Manchu, 0.79% Uyghur, 0.79% Hui, 0.72% Miao, 0.65% Yi, 0.62% Tujia, 0.47% Mongol, 0.44% Tibetan, 0.26% Buyei, 0.15% Korean, 1.05% other(See:List of ethnic groups in China)
Government Socialist state,[3]
Single-party communist state
- President Hu Jintao
- Premier Wen Jiabao
- Chairman of NPCSC Wu Bangguo
- Chairman of CPPCC Jia Qinglin
20
Legislature National People's Congress
Area
- Total9,640,821 km 2 or 9,671,018 km2
(3rd/4th)3,704,427 sq mi
Population
- 2007 estimate 1,321,851,888 (1st)
- 2000 census 1,242,612,226
GDP (nominal) 2008 estimate
- Total $4.329 trillion (3rd)
- Per capita $3,260 (104th)
Currency Yuan (CNY)
China's development was influenced by the alien peoples on the frontiers of
Chinese civilization, who were sinicized into the Chinese polity .
ECONOMY
Economic system in transition, cautiously moving away from Soviet-style central
planning and gradually adopting market economy mechanisms and reduced
government role. Industry, largely based on state and collective ownership,
marked by increasing technological advancements and productivity. China's
people's communes eliminated by 1984--after more than twenty-five years--and
responsibility system of production introduced in agricultural sector. Private
ownership of production assets legal, although major nonagricultural and
industrial facilities still state owned and centrally planned. Restraints on foreign
trade relaxed and joint ventures encouraged.
Shanghai Stock Exchange
21
The Shanghai Stock Exchange (SSE) (simplified Chinese: traditional Chinese: ;
pinyin: Shànghǎi Zhèngquàn Jiāoyìsuǒ) is a Chinese stock exchange or bourse that
is based in the city of Shanghai. It is one of the three stock exchanges operating
independently in the People's Republic of China, the other two are the Shenzhen
Stock Exchange and the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. Unlike the Hong Kong
Stock Exchange, the Shanghai Stock Exchange is still not entirely open to foreign
investors due to tight capital account controls exercised by the Chinese mainland
authorities.
Shanghai Stock Exchange building (in 2008) at Shanghai's new Pudong financial
district.The first share list appeared in June 1866 and by then Shanghai's
International Settlement had developed the conditions conducive to the emergence
of a share market: several banks, a legal framework for joint-stock companies, and
an interest in diversification among the established trading houses (although the
trading houses themselves remained partnerships).
At the end of 2007, the Shanghai Stock Exchange had 860 listed companies with a
combined market capitalization of US$3.7 trillion, making it the largest in
mainland China and sixth largest in the world.
31 COMPANIES LISTED UNDER SHIANGHAI
Kweichow Moutai Co., Ltd
Maanshan Iron & Steel Co., Ltd.
22
Minmetals Development Co., Ltd
Nanjing Textiles Import & Export Corp Ltd.
Ningbo Bird Co., Ltd.
Shanghai Automotive Industry Corporation (Group)
Shanghai Bailian Group Co., Ltd.
Shanghai Pharmaceutical (Group) Co., Ltd
Shanghai Pudong Development Bank
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Company Limited
Xiamen C&D Inc.
Aerospace Communications Holdings Co., Ltd.
Beijing Shunxin Agriculture Co., Ltd.
Beijing Tongrentang Co., Ltd.
Beiqi Foton Motor Company Limited
Beiya Industrial (Group) Co. Ltd.
China Merchants Bank
China Minsheng Banking Corporation Limited
China Yangtze Power Co Ltd.
Chongqing Department Store Co. Ltd.
Citychamp Dartong Co., Ltd.
Daheng New Epoch Technology, Inc.
Dashang Group Co., Ltd.
Datang Telecom Technology Co., Ltd.
Dazhong Transportation (Group) Co., Ltd.
GITI Tire (China) Investment Company Ltd.
Guangzhou Development Industry (Holdings) Co., Ltd.
Handan Iron & Steel Co., Ltd.
Hua Xia Bank Limited
Inner Mongolia BaoTou Steel Union Co.
Inner Mongolia Yili Industrial Group Company Limited
23
Russia
Russian Federation
Российская ФедерацияRossiyskaya Federatsiya
Flag Coat of arms
Capital(and largest city)
Moscow55°45′N 37°37′E 55.75°N 37.617°E
Ethnic groups
79.8% Russian3.8% Tatar2.0% Ukrainian1.2% Bashkir1.1% Chuvash12.1% others[1]
Government Federal Presidential republic
- President Dmitry Medvedev (Ind.)
- Prime Minister Vladimir Putin (UR)
Legislature Federal Assembly
- Upper House Federation Council
- Lower House State Duma
Area
24
- Total 17,075,400 km 2 (1st)6,592,800 sq mi
Population
- 2008 estimate 142,008,838[3] (9th)
- 2002 census 145,166,731
GDP (nominal) 2008 estimate
- Total $1.778 trillion (8th)
- Per capita $12,579 (52nd)Rossiyskaya Federatsiya), is a transcontinental country extending over much of
northern Eurasia. It is a semi-presidential republic comprising 83 federal subjects.
Russia is the largest country in the world, covering more than an eighth of the
Earth’s land area; with 142 million people, it is the ninth largest by population. It
extends across the whole of northern Asia and 40% of Europe, spanning 11 time
zones and incorporating a great range of environments and landforms. It has the
world's largest forest reserves and its lakes contain approximately one-quarter of
the world's unfrozen fresh water. Russia age stucture 14.6% (0-14 years), 71.2%
(15-64 years) , 14.1(65-over)
Economy
Since the turn of the century, rising oil prices, increased foreign investment, higher
domestic consumption and greater political stability have bolstered economic
growth in Russia. The country ended 2007 with its ninth straight year of growth,
averaging 7% annually since the financial crisis of 1998. In 2007, Russia's GDP
was $2.076 trillion (est. PPP), the 6th largest in the world, with GDP growing
8.1% from the previous year. Growth was primarily driven by non-traded services
and goods for the domestic market, as opposed to oil or mineral extraction and
exports. The average salary in Russia was $640 per month in early 2008, up from
$80 in 2000. Approximately 14% of Russians lived below the national poverty
line in 2007, significantly down from 40% in 1998 at the worst of the post-Soviet
25
collapse. Unemployment in Russia was at 6% in 2007, down from about 12.4% in
1999.
A Rosneft petrol station. Russia is the world's leading natural gas exporter and the
second leading oil exporter.
Russia has the world's largest natural gas reserves , the second largest coal reserves
and the eighth largest oil reserves . It is the world's leading natural gas exporter and
the second leading oil exporter. Oil, natural gas, metals, and timber account for
more than 80% of Russian exports abroad. Since 2003, however, exports of
natural resources started decreasing in economic importance as the internal market
strengthened considerably. Despite higher energy prices, oil and gas only
contribute to 5.7% of Russia's GDP and the government predicts this will drop to
3.7% by 2011. Russia is also considered well ahead of most other resource-rich
countries in its economic development, with a long tradition of education, science,
and industry. The country has more higher education graduates than any other
country in Europe.
Russia is Europe's key oil and gas supplier .
The economic development of the country though has been uneven geographically
with the Moscow region contributing a disproportionately high amount of the
country's GDP. Much of Russia, especially indigenous and rural communities in
Siberia, lags significantly behind. Nevertheless, the middle class has grown from
just 8 million persons in 2000 to 55 million persons in 2006. Russia is home to the
largest number of billionaires in the world after the United States, gaining 50
billionaires in 2007 for a total of 110.
MAIN INDEX
26
1.RTS
2.RSE
Russian Trading System
The Russian Trading System is a stock market established in 1995 in Moscow,
consolidating various regional trading floors into one exchange. Originally RTS
was modelled on NASDAQ's trading and settlement software; in 1998 the
exchange went on line with its own in-house system. Initially created as a non-
profit organization, at the moment RTS is in the process of reorganization: it is
being transformed into a joint-stock company.
BRAZIL
Introduction
Federative Republic of Brazil
República Federativa do Brasil
Flag Coat of arms
CapitalBrasília
15°45′S 47°57′W 15.75°S 47.95°W
27
Largest city São Paulo
Official languages Portuguese
Ethnic groups
49.7% White42.6% Pardo (Brown)6.9% Black0.5% Asian0.3% Amerindian
Government Presidential Federal republic
- President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (PT)
- Vice-President José Alencar (PRB)
- President of the Chamber of Deputies Michel Temer (PMDB)
- President of the Senate José Sarney (PMDB)
- Chief Justice Gilmar Mendes
Independence from Portugal
- Declared September 7, 1822
- Recognized August 29, 1825
- Republic November 15, 1889
Area
- Total 8,514,877 km 2 (5th)3,287,597 sq mi
Population
- 2008 estimate 196,342,592 (5th)
- 2007 census 189,987,291
GDP (nominal) 2008 estimate
- Total $1.665 trillion[1] (10th)
- Per capita $6,937[1] (63rd)
Currency Real (R$) (BRL)
28
Demographics
Boa Viagem beach in Recife. Much of Brazil's population is concentrated along
the coastline.
Downtown Rio de Janeiro, one of the most beautiful and modern cities in Latin
America.
Population of Brazil is made up of many racial and ethnic groups. Most Brazilians
can trace their ancestry to the country's Indigenous peoples, Portuguese colonists,
and African slaves. Beginning in the late 19th century, Brazil opened its borders to
immigration: people from over 60 nations migrated to Brazil. The largest
metropolitan areas in Brazil are São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, and Belo Horizonte,
with 19.7, 11.4, and 5.4 million inhabitants respectively. Almost all the capitals
are the largest city in their corresponding state, except for Vitória, the capital of
Espírito Santo, and Florianópolis, the capital of Santa Catarina.
29
Economy
São Paulo, the wealthiest city of Brazil and the largest financial center of the
country.
Brazil is the largest national economy in Latin America, the world's tenth largest
economy at market exchange rates and the ninth largest in purchasing power parity
(PPP), according to the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank; with
large and developed agricultural, mining, manufacturing and service sectors, as
well as a large labor pool. Brazilian exports are booming, creating a new
generation of tycoons. Major export products include aircraft, coffee, automobiles,
soybean, iron ore, orange juice, steel, ethanol, textiles, footwear, corned beef and
electrical equipment. The country has been expanding its presence in international
financial and commodities markets, and is regarded as one of the group of four
emerging economies called BRIC.Nonetheless, foreign direct investment (FDI),
related to long-term, less speculative investment in production, is estimated to be
$193.8 billion for 2007. Inflation monitoring and control currently plays a major
role in Brazil's Central Bank activity in setting out short-term interest rates as a
monetary policy measure.
According to the Brazilian Constitution of 1988, Brazil is a federation of 26
states, one federal district and also the municipalities. None of these units have the
right to secede from the Federation.
MAIN INDEX
1.RIO DE JANEIRO STOCK EXCHANGE
30
2.BOVESPA
3.SAO PAULO STOCK EXCHANGE
BOVESPA’s Indexes
Ibovespa
The Bovespa Index (Ibovespa) is the oldest and most traditional indicator of the
average stock price behavior in Brazil. It represents the present value, in the
current currency, of a stock portfolio organized on January 2, 1968 by a
hypothetical investment. This portfolio consists of stocks that represent an
aggregate value of 80% of the cash volume traded during the twelve months
before the organization of its portfolio.
IBrX-100 : Top 100 shares most traded in terms of number of trades and financial
volume, in the cash market, weighted in accordance with the number of shares in
circulation (free float).
IBrX 50 : Top 50 shares most traded in terms of number of trades and financial
volume, in the cash market, weighted in accordance with the number of shares in
circulation (free float).
IVBX-2 : 50 shares ranked in decreasing order of liquidity (starting from the
11th), measured by their tradability over the last 12 months.
IEE : All exchange listed shares of the electrical power sector companies.
Itel : All exchange listed shares of the telecommunications companies.
IGC : Shares in all companies that adhered to Novo Mercado, Level 1 or 2,
with weighting in accordance with the Corporate Governance commitment. Novo
Mercado companies stocks have weight 2, Level 2s have weight 1.5 and Level 1s
have weight 1.
Itag : All the shares of companies that offer special tag along rights (spreading
control premium) and which were traded at least in 30% of the trading sessions
over the last 12 months
31
32
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
In this an attempt has been made to present in brief, a review of literature
available on the subject to provide a glimpse of the studies done so far on the
"Comparative study of Equity Markets of BRIC Countries" . It gives an eye view
of the findings of other academic researchers who have follow the path with the
study needs to tread. A brief resume of the possible available references is
presented below:
Fernando Ferrari-Filho And Anthony Spanakos (2007) tried to find out "Why
Brazil Has Not Grown: A Comparative Analysis of Brazilian and Chinese
Economic Management" . This paper aims to answer a very basic question asked
by not only Brazilians, but people in other developing countries where liberal
reform agendas were oversold, namely: why has China grown so rapidly and
Brazil not. An interesting point of divergence among the BRICs is in the area of
economic growth and reforms: the BRIC countries which pursued liberal reforms
more aggressively and holistically (Russia and Brazil in the 1990s) grew far
slower than those who were more heterodox (China since the 1980s, and India in
the 1990s). This is counter-intuitive since conventional wisdom holds that China
and India’s growth have largely been the result of freeing up their economies. It
also aims at a partial explanation by surveying the results of a generation of
Washington Consensus era growth. Something approaching a consensus now
exists over the lack of effectiveness of universally applicable holistic reform
programs.
Given the agnosticism about total liberal packages and the puzzle of why
incomplete reformers grew better, the paper engages in a comparative analysis of
Brazilian and Chinese reforms focusing only on the issue of macroeconomic
33
policy, especially the monetary and exchange rate regimes, and its effect on
growth . That is, the Brazilian experience with inflation targeting and flexible
exchange rate regime, since 1999, has contributed to slow start-stop growth and
has been relatively high inflation, while the more managed approaches favored by
China have done the reverse. Finally, the paper concludes offering policy advice to
the other developing countries, BRICs, N-11, or otherwise.
Wilson and Purushothaman, O’Neil, Jim, Purushothaman, and Stupnystka,
2005). In 2007, they published Brics and Beyond, a full-length book which
collected essays that analyzed the trajectories of the BRICs countries, the N-11 (11
other countries that have growth potential), and other possible markets. In the
introduction, Jim O’Neill wrote that since the original paper on the BRICs
countries was written, the equity markets in the BRICs countries had expanded
tremendously (in Brazil by 369.0%, India by 49.0%, Russia by 630.0%, and China
by 201.0% – see O’Neill, 2007, p.5) and that Goldman Sachs continues to be
bullish about them.
After all, regardless of equity market growth, between 2000 and 2006 Brazil
averaged only 3.1% economic growth. Goldman Sachs’ Paulo Leme was sanguine
about this, writing “Brazil has underperformed not only relative to our
expectations but also compared with all the other BRICs. Since 2003, real GDP
growth rates in China, India and Russia have averaged 10.2%, 8.0% and 6.9%, in
each case far exceeding our estimates of their long-term potential (4.9%, 5.8% and
3.5%, respectively)” (Leme, 20071, p.75 )
All four countries had economies where state intervention was considerable up
until the 1980s (Brazil and China) or 1990s (Russia and India) and all have moved
considerably in favor of freeing market actors and reducing the role of the state.
The governments in each of these countries entered the post-World War II period,
with a very clear awareness of a need to catch up and with a belief that
governments should either actively fill market gaps or that they should wholesale
34
collectivize productive activity. Post War policies involved state-led growth
through ambitious multi-year industrialization plans with considerable variety in
degrees of success. All pursued policies that were decidedly inward in orientation
and Brazil, India and China, displayed little interest in trade, save traditional
sectors which were increasingly disadvantaged by macroeconomic policies. The
Soviet Union economy, while more global in orientation, understood its trade
profile as part of a larger context of Communist solidarity and its trade was
determined by political motivations more so than by traditional concerns of price,
productivity and quality. Thus,while the Soviet Union was engaged in trade, it did
so through the Council of Mutual Economic Assistance, a relatively closed
association. The rise in global interest rates, sharp fall in oil prices and global
consumption in the early 1980s exposed many structural weaknesses in the models
pursued by all four countries. The BRICs countries differed in the speed, pace, and
content of the reforms that they implemented, as well as the amount of pressure
they endured from international financial institutions and trading partners.
Nevertheless, all moved towards liberalizing their economies to degrees unknown
by any of those countries for most of the twentieth century. Importantly, all moved
towards transforming state-owned enterprises into private or mixed partnerships
whose performance would be determined by market rather than political
conditions, increasing the role of domestic and foreign (China to a lesser extent)
participation in capital markets, felixibilizing labor contracts and rights, and
welcoming foreign and domestic private investment, particularly in industries once
considered sensitive or part of national security (again, China to a much lesser
extent). Given these similarities, what is telling is the stark difference in economic
growth over the last decade. More specifically, given that the explanation of the
growth of China and India is normally understood as the result of liberalization, it
is important to address why liberalization did not have the same effect in Brazil
and Russia (in the 1990s). Certain commonalities existed among the many
countries and regions in the world which had been hit hard by the rise in oil prices,
35
the global recession in the early 1980s, and its aftermath. These conditions
included high or hyper-inflation, overvalued exchange rates, excessive
indebtedness (often incurred in a foreign currency), rigid labor markets, inefficient
tax collecting agencies, and lack of credibility of monetary policy makers, among
others.
This comparative study of Brazilian and Chinese macroeconomic policies and
outcomes aims to address the puzzle of why the Brazilian economy, despite
considerable liberal reforms, has not produced stable and robust growth. It has
done this by comparing Brazil to peers in the BRICs group, gleaning information
from recent research on the relationship between reforms and growth, and by a
focused comparative case study with China. The paper agrees with the finding in
the literature that broad liberal reform agendas do not necessarily produce stable
and robust economic growth. It does find that certain policies do seem to have
more of an effect in limiting external vulnerability and in producing growth,
particularly policies that allow government’s to maintain autonomy of
macroeconomic policies. This confirms Ferrari Filho and Paula (2006) who find
that economic performance of BRICs countries is the result of the exchange rate
regime, capital account convertibility and fiscal and monetary regimes adopted in
each country. This suggests the necessity of (i) ensuring that monetary policy has a
significant positive impact on the level of economic activity, (ii) directing
financial markets toward financing development rather than rentier-like behavior,
and (iii) creating efficient anti- speculation mechanisms to control (or regulate)
movements of capital in order to prevent monetary and exchange rate crises and
augment the autonomy of domestic decision makers.
Exploring the last issue, the main difference among Brazil and China is that,
paraphrasing and adapting Stiglitz (2002), financial liberalization and capital
mobility in the Brazilian economy in the 1990s were at the center of its currency
crisis, while China, due to their measures of capital controls, could manage
monetary and fiscal policies proeconomic growth. Interestingly enough, in a panel
36
survey of 49 developing countries between 1970-1995, Gastanaga, Nugent and
Pashamova (1998) find that most policy reforms did not have much of an effect on
attracting FDI, though capital controls were associated with an increase in FDI and
the most important factor was economic growth. Uninterrupted and robust
economic growth is the goal of all policy makers, especially in the developing
world. Although academic literature has yet to produce clear causal relationships
which explain the necessary components for such growth and how to bolster these
components, empirical analysis of peer country performance gives valuable
signals to policy makers. It may be difficult to say exactly why, with academic
certainty, China has grown so robustly and consistently. But when Brazil is
compared against China, a strong case may be made for why growth may be weak
and interrupted.
Shuming Bai (Department of Economics and Finance, College of Business
Administration, The University of Texas . Pan American, 2007 ) analyse "The
BRIC Impact in Global Financial Markets". Although China.s economic boom has
been carried forward at a speed of annual GDP growth of over nine percent for the
past twenty-five years, making it the world.s fourth largest economy in 2005 by
World Bank, its equity market performance has not impressively reflected it. On
the contrary, both Shanghai and Shenzhen, the major stock exchanges declined
consecutively for four years until July 2005 when the markets turned around.
Bloomberg in January 2007 reports China.s market capitalization has surpassed
one trillion value in USD, positioning it as Asia.s third-largest market after Japan
and Hong Kong.
According to MSCI Barra, an equities tracker in New York, the big emerging
markets outperform all major mature markets in 2006, with China leading at 59%
return in US dollar, followed by Russia at 50%, India at 48%, Brazil at 38%, and
Mexico at 36% contrasting US S&P 500 at 14% and London.s FTSE at 11%, and
Japan at 7%. Thus, the emerging market
37
returns provided great diversification benefits when the US and other leading
markets were soft.
This study updates and extends previous literature on dependencies in stock
market indexes and exchange among the five largest emerging economies (the
BRIMC) and four developed equity markets in multivariate cointegration analysis.
To our best knowledge, there was no study before that put China, Russia and
India, Brazil and Mexico together in one analysis to see their relative impact on
each other and on other developed markets.
Empirical data show that each univariate series of stock prices has a unit root. The
multivariate conitegration test and the error correction model suggest a long-run
equilibrium relationship among the nine national stock price indexes for the full-
sample period and the two post-crisis periods.
In the short run, the impulse response analysis in the VAR of nine variables for
the. This results conforms with previous study by Masih (1999). Among the three
emerging markets, China shows a little more influence than the other two due to
its close linkage with the Hong Kong market. China and Russia also show more
connection between each other than with India.
However, the empirical evidence is rather weak. With China.s stock market reform
and regulation, along with its continuously spectacular economic development,
China may exert relatively greater influences in the world financial market in the
years to come. Our findings have implications for policy makers and global
investors. For the policy makers, the cointegrating relations provide them
(especially emerging markets) knowledge to adopt more appropriate stock market
policies and regulations from the developed markets. For the developed markets,
policy makers also need to cope with a world that is far more competitive and
dynamic than before and tackle the changes created by global linkages. For global
investors, this study sheds more light on how these three emerging markets are
related to each other and to other developed markets so that they can diversify and
invest globally for greater benefits.
38
DEUTSCHE BORSE AG (February,2007) Deutsche Börse has developed a
strictly rule-based, transparent and liquid index to give investors the opportunity to
participate in these four up-and-coming growth markets: the DAXglobal®
BRIC index (January 2007)
DAXglobal®
BRIC Index
Average annual performance 28.34 %
Annual volatility 22.91 %
Correlation 0.4750
Beta 0.8057
The index portfolio of the DAXglobal® BRIC comprises the top 40 companies
from Brazil, Russia, India, and China, which are the largest in terms of market
capitalization and are very liquid in terms of turnover. Each country is represented
by ten companies. Due to regulatory restrictions in the individual countries and the
usually higher level of liquidity in comparison with the underlyings, the stocks
from Brazil, Russia, and India are charted via ADRs relating to the respective
companies. In order to qualify, the average daily trading volume of each ADR
must exceed US$ 1 million. As for China, the calculation of the DAXglobal®
BRIC index also takes account of the performance of H-shares and red chips from
the Hongkong exchange. The index weighting is based on the market
capitalization of the individual companies. The maximum proportion attributed to
each individual index member is 10 percent; for countries, a cap is set at 35
percent. The weighting is adjusted every three months in order to guarantee the
clarity and balance of the index; the composition is reviewed on an annual basis.
39
The DAXglobal® BRIC index is disseminated in real time and calculated every
trading day between 9 a. m. and 10 p. m. CET.
Deutsche Börse also provides a performance indicator once a day based on the
closing prices. Calculating the index in euros, US dollars and pounds sterling
allows issuers to offer products in various currencies based on the new index;
conversion into US dollars and pounds sterling takes place in real time.
Ramaprasad Bhar and Biljana Nikolova (14 July 2008) study the level of
integration and the dynamic relationship between the BRIC countries, their
respective regions and the world. We find that India shows the highest level of
regional and global integration among the BRIC countries, followed by Brazil and
Russia and lastly by China. There is a negative relationship between the location
conditional volatility of India with that of the Asia-Pacific region and of China
with the world, which indicates a presence of diversification opportunities for
portfolio investors. Portfolio investors can continue to receive sound returns from
taking positions in the index of these countries, however for an outstanding
investment performance, they should consider investing in specific areas of growth
within the economy rather than the country index.
40
OBJECTIVES
41
Following are the objectives of the study:
1. To study the Equity Market of BRIC Countries.
2. To study the factors which lead to the rise of the Equity Market in BRIC Countries.
3. To find the level of Correlation of equity markets among the BRIC Countries.
4. To find the level of Correlation of BRIC Markets with Crude Oil Prices and Gold Prices.
5. To Study the affect the U.S. Financial Crisis on Equity Markets of BRIC Countries.
42
43
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
It is imperative to decide upon and document a research methodology well in
advance to carry out the research in a most effective and systemic way. This
section describes the research methodology adopted to serve the objectives of the
study in an effective manner.
SOURCES OF DATA COLLECTION:
Primary and Secondary sources of information were utilized for the collection of
required data, as comprehensive analysis requires a great deal of it.
PRIMARY DATAPrimary data are the first hand information, which we can get directly from the
people working in that concern. It can be collected by interview, survey,
questionnaires etc.
SECONDARY DATAThe secondary data is the information about the facts that we can get from
published materials such as books, journal , Internet, books etc.
I am using secondary sources of the data collection.
ANALYSIS In my project the source of data collection is Secondary. The present study being
qualitative as well as descriptive in nature was based on study of secondary data .
Analysis was done by performing basic mathematics operations on the data
collected.
Following are the areas which are covered:-
1. To find the correlation between INDIAN and RUSSIAN Equity Market.
2. To find the correlation between SENSEX values and OIL Price.
3. To find the correlation between SENSEX and GOLD Price
4. To find the effect of change in OIL and GOLD PRICES on INDIA AND
RUSSIA
5. Mathematical Formulas are used to find the correlation
44
The formula for Pearson's correlation takes on many forms. A commonly used
formula is shown below.
N =Number of values or elements
x=First Score
Y = Second Score
ΣXY = Sum of the product of first and Second Scores
ΣX = Sum of First Scores
ΣY = Sum of Second Scores
ΣX2 = Sum of square First Scores
ΣY2 = Sum of square Second Scores
45
CORRELATION BETWEEB RUSSIA AND INDIA INDEX
46
Comparing the values of RTS EXCHANGE and NSE Stock Exchange.
5.1 Table shows the value of RTS
country Jan04 June04 Jan05 June05 Jan06 June06 Jan07 June07 Jan08 June 08 Jan09Russia 567 605 667 1125 1460 1921 1829 2290 2460 631 631
5.1 Graph shows the value of RTS
Russia
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
Years
Inde
x Va
lue
Russia
5.2 Table showing % change in index of RUSSIA And INDIA
June04 Jan05 June05 Jan06 June06 Jan07 June07 Jan08 June 08 Jan09India -21 38 0.3 36 4 34 8 43 -21 -38Russia -2 9 10 69 30 32 -5 25 7 -74
5.2 Graph showing % change in index of RUSSIA And INDIA
47
India And Russia
-100
-80
-60
-40
-200
20
40
60
80
Years
% C
hang
e in
val
ues
India
Russia
CORRELATION
Correlation between these two are
R = 0.68
INTERPRETATION
There exist a fairly high correlation between the Russia and India. It means the
factors that affect are same. These may be Foreign capital flow and high
correlation of both the countries with the World Equity Market It shows that the
Economy of these countries are of similar nature. If the value of one is increasing
then the value of other is also increasing but the rate of increase is different.
48
COMPARING RUSSIAN STOCK EXCHANGE WITH CHANGING PRICE
OF GOLD
5.3 Table showing % change in RTS values and GOLD prices
Particular June04 Jan05 June05 Jan06 June06 Jan07 June07 Jan08 June 08 Jan09Gold -5 10 -5 24 22 1 5 25 6 -2Russia -2 9 10 69 30 32 -5 25 7 -74
5.3 Graph showing % change in RTS values and GOLD prices
Russia And Gold
-100
-50
0
50
100
6/1/20
04
1/1/20
05
6/1/20
05
1/120
06
6/1/20
06
1/1/20
07
6/1/20
07
1/1/20
08
6/1/20
08
1/1/20
09
Date
% C
hang
e in
val
ues
RussiaGold
.
CORRELATION
Correlation = 0 .4
INTERPRETATION
There exist low correlation between these. The effect of change in price of gold
effects little the equity market of Russia.
49
FINDING CORRELATION BETWEEN CHINA STOCK MARKET AND
RUSIA INDEX
5.4 Table showing % change in RTS values and China Index values
Country June04 Jan05 June05 Jan06 June06 Jan07 June07 Jan08 June 08 Jan09China 6 -20 -19 12 45 59 50 32 -35 -47Russia -2 9 10 69 30 32 -5 25 7 -74
5.4 Graph showing % change in RTS values and China Index values
Russia And China
-100
-50
0
50
100
6/1/20
04
1/1/20
05
6/1/20
05
1/120
06
6/1/20
06
1/1/20
07
6/1/20
07
1/1/20
08
6/1/20
08
1/1/20
09
Date
% C
hang
e in
Val
ues
RussiaChina
CORRELATION
Correlation = 0 .5
INTERPRETATION
There exists moderate correlation between these. It means the economy of both the
countries is some where similar in nature and some factors which affect one also
affect to the other.
50
FINDING CORRELATION BETWEEN RUSSIA INDEX AND BRAZIL
5.5 Table showing % change in Brazil and Russia Index values
Country June04 Jan05 June05 Jan06 June06 Jan07 June07 Jan08 June 08 Jan09Brazil -13 49 -11 29 13 18 20 20 14 -48Russia -2 9 10 69 30 32 -5 25 7 -74
5.5 Graph showing % change in RTS values and China Index values
Brazil and Russia
-100
-50
0
50
100
Date
% C
hang
e
RussiaBrazil
CORRELATION
Correlation = 0 .6
INTERPRETATION
There is fairly high correlation between these two countries. It means the factors
that affect are same. These may be Foreign capital flow and high correlation of
both the countries with the World Equity Market It shows that the Economy of
these countries are of similar nature.
51
FINDING CORRELATION BETWEEN INDIAN STOCK MARKET AND
GOLD PRICE
5.6 Table showing values of NIFTY
Country Jan04 June04 Jan05 June05 Jan06 June06 Jan07 June07India 1912.25 1507.9 2080.5 2087.55 2836.55 2962.25 3966.4 4297.05
5.6 Graph showing values of NIFTY
INDIA index
01000200030004000500060007000
1/1/20
04
6/1/20
04
1/1/20
05
6/1/20
05
1/120
06
6/1/20
06
1/1/20
07
6/1/20
07
1/1/20
08
6/1/20
08
1/1/20
09
Years
Inde
x Va
lues
INDIA
5.7 Table showing % change in Index values Nifty and Gold prices
Particular June04 Jan05 June05 Jan06 June06 Jan07 June07 Jan08 June 08 Jan09Gold -5 10 -5 24 22 1 5 25 6 -2India -21 38 0.3 36 4 34 8 43 -21 -38
Country Jan08 June 08 Jan09India 6144.35 4870.1 3033.45
52
5.7 Graph showing % change in Index values Nifty and Gold prices
India And Gold
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
6/1/2004 1/1/2005 6/1/2005 1/12006 6/1/2006 1/1/2007 6/1/2007 1/1/2008 6/1/2008 1/1/2009
Date
% C
nahg
e
India
Gold
CORRELATION
Correlation = .44
INTERPRETATION
Rang of correlation lies between -1<=r <=1 . There exist moderate correlation
between these. There is very little effect of change in prices of gold with change in
stock value of India.
53
FINDING CORRELATION BETWEEN CHINA SSE COMPOSITE INDEX
AND INDIA INDEX VALUES
5.8 Tables showing values of SSE COMPOSITE INDEXCountry 1/1/2004 6/1/2004 1/1/2005 6/1/2005 1/12006 6/1/2006 1/1/2007 6/1/2007China 1494 1580 1267 1034 1161 1684 2675 4001
Country 1/1/2008 6/1/2008 1/1/2009China 5262 3433 1821
5.8 Graph showing values of SSE COMPOSITE INDEX
China Index
01000
200030004000
50006000
1/1/20
04
6/1/20
04
1/1/20
05
6/1/20
05
1/120
06
6/1/20
06
1/1/20
07
6/1/20
07
1/1/20
08
6/1/20
08
1/1/20
09
Years
Inde
x V
alue
s
China
5.9 Table showing % change in China and India Index values
Country June04 Jan05 June05 Jan06 June06 Jan07 June07 Jan08 June 08 Jan09India -21 38 0.3 36 4 34 8 43 -21 -38China 6 -20 -19 12 45 59 50 32 -35 -47
54
5.9 Graph showing % change in China and India Index values
China And India
-100
-50
0
50
100
6/1/2004 1/1/2005 6/1/2005 1/12006 6/1/2006 1/1/2007 6/1/2007 1/1/2008 6/1/2008 1/1/2009
Date
%Ch
ange
in v
alue
IndiaChina
CORRELATION
Correlaiton = .49
INTERPRETATION
There exists a positive and moderate correlation between these two countries.
Certain factors are same which affect the economy and equity market of both the
countries.
55
FINDING CORRELATION BETWEEN BRAZIL AND INDIA INDEX
VALUES
5.10 Table showing value of BOVESPA IndexCountry 1/1/2004 6/1/2004 1/1/2005 6/1/2005 1/12006 6/1/2006 1/1/2007 6/1/2007Brazil 22445 19546 29196 37748 33456 37748 44474 53423
Country 1/1/2008 6/1/2008 1/1/2009Brazil 63886 72593 37550
5.10 Graph showing value of BOVESPA Index
Brazil
01000020000300004000050000600007000080000
1/1/20
04
6/1/20
04
1/1/20
05
6/1/20
05
1/120
06
6/1/20
06
1/1/20
07
6/1/20
07
1/1/20
08
6/1/20
08
1/1/20
09
BOVESPA As On
Poin
ts
Brazil
5.11 Table showing % change in Brazil and India Index values
Country June04 Jan05 June05 Jan06 June06 Jan07 June07 Jan08 June 08 Jan09India -21 38 0.3 36 4 34 8 43 -21 -38Brazil -13 49 -11 29 13 18 20 20 14 -48
56
5.11 Graph showing % change in Brazil and India Index values
Brazil and India
-60-40-20
0204060
Date
% C
hang
e in
va
lue
IndiaBrazil
CORRELATION
Correlation = .7
INTERPRETATION
It shows there exist fairly high correlation between these two. That means the
economy of these two countries behaves same in same situations and both are inter
related. These may be foreign capital flow and high correlation of both the
countries with the World Equity Market It shows that the Economy of these
countries is of similar nature.
57
FINDING CORRELATION BETWEEN CHINA SSE COMPOSITE INDEX
AND GOLD PRICE
5.12 Table showing % change in China Index values and Gold prices
June04 Jan05 June05 Jan06 June06 Jan07 June07 Jan08 June 08 Jan09Gold -5 10 -5 24 22 1 5 25 6 -2
China 6 -20 -19 12 45 59 50 32 -35 -47
5.12 Graph showing % change in China Index values and Gold prices
China And Gold
-60
-40
-20
020
40
60
80
6/1/20
04
1/1/20
05
6/1/20
05
1/120
06
6/1/20
06
1/1/20
07
6/1/20
07
1/1/20
08
6/1/20
08
1/1/20
09
Date
% c
hang
e in
val
ue
GoldChina
CORRELATION
Correlation = .25
INTREPRETATION
It shows there is very low correlation between change in price of gold and change
in value of China index . There is near about no effect if the prices of gold are
changing on the equity market
58
FINDING CORRELATION BETWEEN CHINA SSE COMPOSITE INDEX
AND BRAZIL INDEX
5.13 Table showing % change in China Index values and Brazil Index
June04 Jan05 June05 Jan06 June06 Jan07 June07 Jan08 June 08 Jan09Brazil -13 49 -11 29 13 18 20 20 14 -48
China 6 -20 -19 12 45 59 50 32 -35 -47
5.13 Graph showing % change in China Index values and Brazil Index
China And Brazil
-100
-50
0
50
100
Date
%Ch
ange
in v
alue
ChinaBrazil
CORRELATION
Correlation = .3
INTREPRETATION
It shows there is low correlation between these two countries. It shows the
economy of the countries is different. The factors that affect the equity market are
different.
59
FINDING CORRELATION BETWEEN GOLD PRICE AND BRAZIL
INDEX
5.14 Table showing % change in Gold Price and Brazil Index
June04 Jan05 June05 Jan06 June06 Jan07 June07 Jan08 June 08 Jan09Brazil -13 49 -11 29 13 18 20 20 14 -48
Gold -5 10 -5 24 22 1 5 25 6 -2
5.14 Graph showing % change in Gold Price and Brazil Index
Brazil And Gold
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
Date
%Ch
ange
in v
alue
GoldBrazil
CORRELATION
Correlation = -.01
INTERPRETATION
It shows the negative very low near about no correlation between the rise of gold
prices and BRAZIL Index. Negative correlation means if the price of one is
increasing then the price of other is decreasing.
60
FINDING CORRELATION BETWEEN OIL PRICE AND INDIA INDEX
Oil prices are taken as DOLLAR PER BARREL and the average of the month is
taken to find the correlation.
5.15 Table showing % change in Oil Price and India Index
June04 Jan05 June05 Jan06 June06 Jan07 June07 Jan08 June 08 Jan09Oil 9 18 25 20 9 -26 28 32 41 -71
India -17 31 9 39 -3 50 8 19 20 -36
5.15 Graph showing % change in Oil Price and India Index
Oil and India
-100
-50
0
50
100
Date
% C
hang
e in
va
lue
OilIndia
CORRELATION
Correlation = .37
INTERPRETATION
It shows the low but positive correlation between the rise in the price of Oil and
India Index value. It indicates the oil prices and index value of India rise because
of speculation of world is in rising.
61
FINDING CORRELATION BETWEEN OIL PRICE AND INDIA INDEX
5.16 Table showing % change in Oil Price and Brazil Index
June04 Jan05 June05 Jan06 June06 Jan07 June07 Jan08 June 08 Jan09Oil 9 18 25 20 9 -26 28 32 41 -71
Brazil -11 22 4 37 -2 28 23 4 19 -42
5.16 Graph showing % change in Oil Price and Brazil Index
Oil and Brazil
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
6/1/20
04
1/1/20
05
6/1/20
05
1/120
06
6/1/20
06
1/1/20
07
6/1/20
07
1/1/20
08
6/1/20
08
1/1/20
09
Date
% C
hang
e in
val
ues
OilBrazil
CORRELATION
Correlation = .5
INTERPRETATION
It shows there is high correlation between these two . it means if the prices of oil
increases then index value of Brazil also increases.
62
FINDING CORRELATION BETWEEN OIL PRICE AND RUSSIA INDEX
5.17 Table showing % change in Oil Price and Russia Index
June04 Jan05 June05 Jan06 June06 Jan07 June07 Jan08 June 08 Jan09Oil 9 18 25 20 9 -26 28 32 41 -71
Russia -3 6 12 77 1 45 1 -1 12 -68
5.17 Graph showing % change in Oil Price and Russia Index
Russia and Oil
-100
-50
0
50
100
Date
% C
hang
e in
va
lues
OilRussia
CORRELATION
Correlation = .49
INTERPRETATION
It shows there is high correlation between these two . it means if the prices of oil
increases then index value of Russia also increases .Russia is an oil producing
country when the prices of oil increases the value of Index also increases and
decreases when oil prices decreases.
63
FINDING CORRELATION BETWEEN OIL PRICE AND CHINA INDEX
5.18 Table showing % change in Oil Price and China Index
June04 Jan05 June05 Jan06 June06 Jan07 June07 Jan08 June 08 Jan09Oil 9 18 25 20 9 -26 28 32 41 -71
Russia -3 6 12 77 1 45 1 -1 12 -68
5.18 Graph showing % change in Oil Price and China Index
China And Oil
-100
-50
0
50
100
Date
% C
hang
e in
va
lue
OilChina
CORRELATION
Correlation = - .01
INTERPRETATION
It shows there is negative correlation between these two. It means if the prices of
oil increases then index value of Brazil also decreases stay unchanged. China is
not oil producing country so when the prices of oil increases import charges
also increases and it results into decrease in the value of index.
64
Global Financial Crisis And Emerging Markets
CORRELATION BEFORE CRISS
5.19 Tables showing the value of India and Russia Index and Prices of Oil
2/1/2008 3/1/2008 4/1/2008 5/1/2008 6/1/2008 7/1/2008 8/1/2008 9/1/2008 10/1/2008India -0.7 -11 4 6 -17 -6 12 -10 -32Oil 0.17 14.2 1.4 11.4 8.6 -0.08 -7.6 -19.2 -31.1Russia -1.2 0 3.9 3.4 3.9 -17.9 -10.1 -33.9 -39.8
11/1/2008 12/1/2008 1/1/2009 2/1/2009 3/1/2009 4/1/2009India -0.6 3 -0.7 2 -7.5 22Oil -20.8 -31.7 4.5 -4 18.5 14.27Russia 0.58 8.7 -1.4 12.45 3.8 21.63
5.19 Graph showing the value of India and Russia Index and Prices of Oil
India,Russia And Oil
-60
-40
-200
20
40
Feb-08
Mar-08
Apr-08
May-08
Jun-08
Jul-08
Aug-08
Sep-08
Oct-08
Nov-08
Dec-08
Jan-09
Feb-09
Mar-09
Apr-09
DatePoin
ts
IndiaOilRussia
CORRELATIONIndia & Oil = 0.11
Russia & Oil = 0.42
INTERPRETATION
Correlation between India and Oil is low and between Russia and oil is high.It
shows the equity market of Russia affects with changing prices of oil.
If the prices increases the index moves up if decreases then move down.
65
How did a “house fire” in America turn into a global banking crisis?
1. Sub-prime mortgages are a financial innovation designed to provide home
ownership opportunities to borrowers in the U.S. with a higher risk profile (such
as borrowers with low incomes, bad credit histories or limited disposable income).
Most of the sub-prime mortgages were given out on a variable interest-rate basis,
with the risk of potentially large adjustments to monthly payments if interest rates
rose. Instruments of this nature increase the probability of foreclosure.
2. Institutions (lenders) were “easy” with credit regarding these mortgages under
the assumption that housing prices would continue to appreciate in value. Even if
some of the sub-prime borrowers would default, an ever expanding housing
market would still improve the lender’s overall position. However, money market
rates increased, inciting foreclosures, as expected, but occurred at the same time
the housing market and valuations cooled. This left the lending institutions with
assets of significantly reduced, and in some case worthless, value.
And why did it spread out globally?
Many of these sub-prime mortgages actually never made it on the balance sheets
of the lending institutions that originated them. Increasingly, these products had
been bundled together with prime mortgages and a variety of assets to be sold on
the market (so-called mortgage-backed securities, MBS).
The problem was that assets with different risk profiles were bundled together and
nevertheless received a high investment grading, making them attractive to
international investors, including European banks with free cash to go asset-
shopping.
1. However, when sub-prime borrowers failed to repay their mortgages, the
originating institution needed to finance the foreclosure with their own money,
bringing the asset back on its balance sheet. This left many banks in a financially
unviable situation, in a rather short, unmanageable timeframe. And, the fact that
nobody knew how much more of those MBS would return on their balance sheets,
66
banks effectively stopped lending to each other, drying up liquidity substantially,
both in the US and in Europe.
As the financial crisis continues to roil credit and stock markets around the globe,
there seems to be no country or continent is being spared the consequences. The
BRIC countries consist of Brazil, Russia, India and China is no exception. The US
financial crisis that started in July 2007 with the collapse of two Bear Sterns
subprime hedge funds has now turned into a full-blown global economic crisis.
Arguably, the climax of the financial crisis has been reached with the collapse of
Lehman Brothers on September 15, and the subsequent fall of stock markets all
around the world.
CORRELATION AFTER CORRELATION
5.20 Tables showing the value of India and Russia Index and Prices of Oil
2/1/2007 3/1/2007 4/1/2007 5/1/2007 6/1/2007 7/1/2007 8/1/2007 9/1/2007India -3 -4 0.32 11 1.7 4.7 -4.6 10.2Oil 13.5 -1.2 8.6 -0.06 5.3 9.7 -2.5 8.4Russia 4.4 -6.1 9 -9.6 4.7 5.9 -4.9 2.3
10/1/2008 11/1/2008 12/1/2008 1/1/2009 2/1/2009 3/1/2009 4/1/2009India -32 -0.6 3 -0.7 2 -7.5 22Oil -31.1 -20.8 -31.7 4.5 -4 18.5 14.27Russia -39.8 0.58 8.7 -1.4 12.45 3.8 21.63
67
5.20 Graph showing the value of India and Russia Index and Prices of Oil
India,Russia And Oil
-60
-40
-200
20
40
Feb-08
Mar-08
Apr-08
May-08
Jun-08
Jul-08
Aug-08
Sep-08
Oct-08
Nov-08
Dec-08
Jan-09
Feb-09
Mar-09
Apr-09
Date
Poin
ts IndiaOilRussia
CORRELATION
India and Oil = 0.31
Russia and Oil = 0.42
Interpretation
After crisis correlation between India and Oil increases. Correlation between
Russia and Oil remain same.
Generally risks to BRIC markets have intensified…The BRIC had been fairly
resilient to the global credit turmoil, however the giant economy is slowly facing
greater risks. As the credit crunch crisis has intensified, BRIC countries that once
appeared relatively immune to the financial and economic shocks emanating from
mature markets have increasingly been tested. Deleveraging by global financial
institutions has raised the cost and reduced the availability of external financing
and investor risk appetite has decreased, reducing the demand for BRIC market
assets. The pronounced reduction in investors’ risk appetite has resulted in a
retrenchment in short-term capital flows to the BRIC markets, exerting pressure on
local markets, and sharply raising costs of credit.
68
Economic growth in India in 2Q08 moderated to 7.9% compared to 8.8% in 1Q08
underpinned by a weakening investment. However, India’s private consumption
and export growth have held up well amid the global financial crisis. GDP growth
in China however eased to 10.5% in 1H08 from 12% in 2007 due to slowing
exports. Other activities continued to be supported by steady investment growth
and accelerating consumption. Among the BRIC countries, China’s GDP appears
to be the most resilient..
Investors will likely remain on the sidelines as BRIC equity markets go through a
correction after rising rapidly over the past three years. Case in point is Russia,
when regulators halted stock trading for a second day and poured USD44bln into
its three biggest banks in a bid to halt the biggest financial crisis since its
devaluation and debt default a decade ago. China’s stocks fell to the lowest in
almost 21 months after China Merchants Bank Co. said it held USD70mln of debt
issued by bankrupt Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Growth slowdown as high energy prices inhibit household spending and a
spillover from the US slowdown impacts exports.
Indeed, if food and oil prices continue higher, the impact of rising prices on basic
necessities and rising interest rates could be quite damaging for growth in these
economies and traumatic for their societies. The risk is for a higher than expected
slowdown in emerging market economic growth under the weight of higher costs,
lower household spending and higher interest rates.
BRAZIL
When the global financial crisis arrived, it struck at Brazilian equities first, then
moved to the currency markets, and has since pushed up interest rates and
increased uncertainty, threatening to slow economic growth in the near future. As
of this writing, Brazilian equities continue to fall, as do equities across the world.
69
Brazil GDP growth in Brazil in 2007 was the highest in Latin American countries.
However, the GDP growth began to slow in 2008, even before the October crisis.
In 2Q08, Brazil’s GDP grew 6.13% y-o-y from 5.84% in 1Q08. Despite the
moderate increase in the GDP growth, Brazil’s economy is facing an awkward
combination of slow activity and more difficult external conditions. Growth in
Brazil is forecasted to decrease below trend as exports and remittances are
dampened by the U.S slowdown. The financial crisis has triggered downwards
revisions in economic growth in Brazil for 2009. While the country is set to post
5.1% GDP growth for 2008, the forecast for 2009 is 2.8%. The financial crisis and
decline in commodity prices which tend to reduce the amount of exports
contribute to lower growth
BOVESPA
In the beginning of 2008, MSCI Emerging Markets/MSCI World Markets showed
some weakness. Emerging Markets started underperforming the World Markets.
Commodity prices are weak and there are concerns about growth and demand for
commodities
Lower export growth…
Export growth in Brazil is expected to come down below trend, and activity would
remain sluggish in Mexico as exports and remittances are dampened by the US
slowdown. The country is less reliant on US demand than in the past (exports to
the US are down from around 27% of the total in 2003 to 15% in 2008), but with
other important export destinations faltering, notably the EU (which accounts for
24% of Brazil’s exports) and China(6%),the country is vulnerable to trade
contagion. Main export goods for Brazil are transport equipment, iron ore,
soybeans, footwear, coffee, and automobiles.
70
RUSSIA
Like other BRIC countries, Russia is in the grips of global financial market
turmoil. The Russian stock exchange index RTS has fallen by around 50% from its
peak in May 2008, reaching the level of summer 2006. After many years of
strengthening rouble have witnessed a slight weakening, and the central bank
has had to intervene by buying the currency in order to prevent its excessive
weakening against a currency basket made up of the US dollar and the Euro.
Russa’s GDP growth is expected to weaken appreciably, reflecting slowing world
demand and tightening financial conditions. In 2Q08, Russia’s GDP moderated to
7.5% from 8.5% in 1Q08. For Russia, the effects of the global credit crunch are
compounded by domestic factors, particularly a lack of confidence on the part
of foreign investors in Russia. The impact of the crisis on most Russians has so far
been minimal, partly because the crisis has received little attention in the largely
state-linked mainstream media. And it has not done much damage to the image of
the country's popular but increasingly authoritarian government.
The fall in oil prices to close to US$50/barrel envisaged makes Russia reliant on
other areas of the economy to sustain growth. But lack of diversification and
weaknesses in the business environment mean there are few alternatives for
Russia. Russia’s oil supply to decline in 2008…Russia’s oil production is now
forecast to experience a minor decline of around 20 tb/d over the previous year to
average 9.85 mb/d in 2008, indicating a downward revision of 30 tb/d from last
month’s assessment. The downward revision was made to accommodate the
adjustment to preliminary third-quarter production figures as well as minor
revisions to the first and the second quarters. According to preliminary data,
Russia’s oil supply stood at 9.84 mb/d in the third quarter, with many operators in
Russia reporting losses due to the relatively high duties. On a quarterly basis,
Russian oil supply is seen averaging 9.78 mb/d, 9.74 mb/d, 9.84 mb/d and 10.03
mb/d respectively.
71
RTS INDEX
RTS Index was trending up during the 1996-1997 period. The index moved from
72 levels to 570 levels. During the uptrend RSI signaled deceleration. The market
made higher highs but the RSI failed to make higher highs. The uptrend was
followed by a correction after breaking down the trend channel. During 2002-2003
period, RTS was testing its 1997 highs. The market again made higher highs but
the RSI failed to make higher highs. The uptrend was followed by a 2 year long
consolidation period. In 2005, the RTS index broke above the 2 year long
consolidation range at 750 levels and reached the upper boundary at 1,800. The
market made higher highs after 2006 and reached to 2500 levels but the speed was
decelerating. RSI was failing to make higher highs. The index broke down the
long term trend channel and we are now in a correction period. 580 levels is an
important long term support for the RTS index. We will follow RSI to see the
deceleration of the downtrend.
INDIA
India has been hurt by the global financial crisis, but it may be better positioned
for a quick recovery and for future growth than many of the other developing
economies. The Indian financial sector is relatively insulated; the rupee is not fully
convertible; and Indian banks did not have significant exposure to subprime loans
in the United States. The stock market, however, has been badly hit as foreign
institutional investors (FIIs) have sold almost US$10bln of their investments in
Indian companies to cover losses accrued in their home markets. From January
2008 to late October 2008, the Bombay Stock Exchange fell almost 50 percent,
from above 20,000 to around 10,500. There has also been an intense liquidity
crisis in the Indian economy, created by the tightening of global credit markets and
the withdrawal of FIIs, as well as earlier government efforts to fight inflation and
shore up the declining rupee. Slower GDP growth….The economic cycle in
72
emerging Asia started to turn in early 2008, and more weakness is expected ahead
in response to slowing demand from advanced economies and growing strains in
regional financial markets. In India, growth in 2Q08 came down to 7.9% from
8.5% in 1Q08, on the back of weakening investment, while private consumption
and export growth have held up well amid the global financial crisis.
SENSEX (INDIA)
1990-1992 was a strong period for the SENSEX, where the index moved from 700
to 3,800. However, after 1992 we saw a choppy sideways movement between
2,500 and 6,500. The consolidation range had a slightly positive slope. The index
moved in the wide range between 1992 and 2005. During 2002-2003 SENSEX
tested the lower boundary of the consolidation range and rebounded from 2,800
levels. In March 2005, the index reached 7,000. After a short pullback, SENSEX
broke above the upper boundary and started its strong uptrend. In the beginning of
2008, India's SENSEX index was testing 21,000 levels. The global sell-off and
sharp corrections in the World markets pushed the SENSEX back to the previous
consolidation range in 10 months. The index tested the upper boundary of the
consolidation range at 8,000 and rebounded. 20-50 and 100 week moving averages
are signaling a bear market. 8,000 is strong support. If the index holds above 8,000
levels we can expect a rebound towards the moving averages at 12,000 levels
CHINA
China’s economic growth rate slipped into single digits in the 3Q08 for the first
time in at least four years under the impact of the global credit crisis and weakness
in the domestic property sector. Annual gross domestic product growth slowed
more sharply than expected to 9%from 10.1% in the 2Q08. China's economic
expansion was the weakest since at least the second quarter of 2003, when growth
slumped because of the severe acute respiratory syndrome, or SARS, epidemic.
73
SSE COMPOSITE INDEX CHINA
The uptrend that started in 2006 pushed the index from 1,500 levels to 6,000 in
two years. During the strong uptrend, every correction took place in the parallel
trend channel and above the moving average. The first trend reversal signal was
generated at the beginning of 2008, when SSE Composite broke down the two
year long uptrend . Since then the index has been in a downtrend and gave back
almost all the gains of 2006 and 2007. The downtrend is continuing in a clear
parallel trend channel. We will be following the upper boundary of the parallel
trend channel and the moving average for a trend reversal. The important
resistances are at 2,300-2,500 range.
What is being done to solve the problem?
1 The U.S. government has spent (or committed) more than a trillion dollars in
trying to prevent the collapse of U.S. financial markets. Following the bailout of
Bear Sterns, AIG, Freddie Mac, and Fannie Mae, the U.S. Congress approved the
Emergency Economic Stabilization Act to give authority to the U.S. Treasury to
buy troubled mortgages and mortgage-related securities. However, the original
package (US$ 700 billion) has been revised to include a recapitalization of banks,
federal guarantees on new bank debt for three years and FDIC insurance for non-
interest bearing accounts. If the troubled assets (MBS) bought by the Treasury are
later sold at a fair market value, this could ultimately be a profitable transaction for
the U.S. government. And, if the Treasury finds the right buyers for the banks that
it partially owns, then it could also end up making money.
2 In Europe, the Bank of England pledged US$ 87 billion in direct support to the
country’s major financial institutions. British Prime Minister Gordon Brown’s
rescue package which involves direct capitalization and guarantee of inter-bank
lending has been adopted by other major European countries and the U.S.
government (as mirrored by the new revisions adopted by the U.S. Treasury).
Furthermore, central banks around the world (Fed, ECB, Canada, Sweden,
74
Switzerland, and China) introduced coordinated interest rate cuts to lower the cost
of borrowing, with the aim of restoring confidence in the global economy.
3 The Reserve Bank of India on March 04,2009 has announced the rate cut. It has
reduced the repo rate by 50 basis points to 5% and cut the reverse repo rate by 50
basis points to 3.5% with immediate effect.
WHY BRIC COUNTRIES PERFORM DIFFERENTLY
The behavior of these countries are different with respect to changing conditions.
Russia
The Russian economy is dominated by the energy sector: · Crude oil exports make
up about 60% of Russian exports. · Russia’s share of global crude oil production
in 2003 was some 11%, making the country the second largest oil producer in the
world after Saudi Arabia. Russia has a share of 5% in global oil reserves, placing it
in ninth position amongst oil producing countries.
More than a quarter of world natural gas reserves are located on Russian territory.
Only Qatar and Iran also have double-digit shares, each about 15%, of world gas
reserves. Russia leads in the production of natural gas as well, followed closely by
the U. S.A. Steadily rising prices for oil have generated
substantial, unforeseen income in US dollars for oil producers and for the Russian
state since the end of the nineties. This has enabled Russia to make early
repayments of government debt. Since 1999, public sector debt in Russia has been
halved to around 35% of GDP. Although the heavy dependency of Russia on oil
and gas may at first sight be a source of concern, the Russian economy is
relatively well prepared for periods of declining oil prices. According to initial
budget plans, the public sector budget would slide into deficit only at oil prices of
under 30 US dollars a barrel. The country’s foreign-exchange reserves are at a
record level and form a cushion against possible external shocks.
India
75
For years, India has attracted attention through the successful establishment there
of English-speaking call centres and software companies. It is unusual for the
export of services to play a major role in a developing country. The dynamic
growth of this sector is likely to continue, and is a positive feature of India.
Although the IT sector only accounted for 3% of Indian GDP in 2003, the services
sector has had a decisive impact on overall growth in the country in recent years.
The Indian economy continues to centre on traditional industries, however.
The agricultural sector accounts for about a quarter of economic output and two-
thirds of the workforce are employed in this sector. Traditional goods also make
up the bulk of Indian exports. In industry, the textile sector dominates. The major
role that agriculture still plays is also reflected in income levels in India. In terms
of per capita income, India trails far behind the other BRIC countries. In greatly
implified terms it can be concluded that Brazil stands for raw materials and
agricultural produce, Russia for oil and gas, that India has found a promising
niche with its IT and call-centre services and that China is the most advanced of all
in many industrial areas thanks to its international competitiveness.
Brazil
What oil and gas is for Russia, iron ore, coffee and soya are for Brazil. In the
export of these goods especially Brazil leads the world. And even though their
share of Brazilian exports is much lower today than it was ten years ago, high
prices for soya and iron ore are having a positive impact on the country’s trade
balance. However, Brazil is much more than just a producer of raw materials. In
2004, over 50% of the goods exported by Brazil, the biggest country in Latin
America both in terms of area and economic power, were manufactured products.
Brazil also produces oil although its share of world reserves of 1% is minor
compared to say Russia’s. But at least the country can meet its oil needs from its
own production. High oil prices thus do not have a negative effect on the country’s
current account balance. The high level of Brazilian foreign debt (135% of
exports) is still a problem and the relatively low savings rate as well as investment
76
shortfalls in infrastructure are curbing growth. However, since 2003 current
account surpluses have made it possible for Brazil to build up foreign exchange
reserves, and growth should accelerate to nearly 4% in 2007. Adjustments
in the structure of government debt have lessened the vulnerability of the country
to external shocks.
China
There are frequent reports on the shift of production facilities from industrial
countries to China. Will the largest Asian country soon become the world’s most
important production centre? Sweeping economic reforms have a long tradition in
China. Since the end of the seventies, the government has been endeavouring to
improve the country’s economic structures. With success: the share of
manufactured goods in exports has now reached some 50%.
The start of the process of change in China is reflected in the growth of the
economy. Since 1982, China‘s economy, with a few exceptions, has grown year
for year by over 7%. Not only industrial countries dream of such continuously
high growth. China also tops the growth rankings in direct comparisons with other
developing countries. In spite of the lengthy phase of unusually high growth,
China is still far removed from the status of an industrial country. Like Russia,
China is still in a transformation process, evolving from a centrally-planned into a
market economy. Such sweeping reform processes take time and are subject to the
risk of temporary setbacks.
Volatile oil prices have varying impacts on the Bric’s economies. High oil prices
help large producers like Russia that rely on exports for fiscal revenue and foreign
exchange. For the net oil-importing countries of China and India, the price of oil is
a key determinant of inflation, the cost of production, the trade balance and the
strength of the currency. Whereas Brazil, which is now largely self-sufficient and
has insulated its economy from oil price shock on net basis.
77
In 2007, Russia’s real gross domestic product (GDP) grew by about 8.1%,
surpassing average growth rates in all other G-8 countries, and marking the
country’s seventh consecutive year of economic expansion. Russia’s economic
growth over the past seven years has been driven primarily by energy exports,
given the increase in Russian oil production and relatively high world oil prices
during the period.
While Russia might expect their large oil reserves to pave the way for economic
development, it is observed that oil-exporting economies have experienced
difficulty in converting oil revenues into a continuous source of financing for
economic growth and development. Oil exports have represented a greater share of
gross domestic product (GDP) in Russia than Brazil, China and India over past 5
years. Oil exports contribution to Russian GDP have increased from 15.8% of
GDP in 2003 to 17.5% of GDP in 2007.
Revenue from oil and gas extraction and export is a central component of the
Russian government’s budget, and the hydrocarbon industry is one of the main
drivers of the country's economy. Russian government is keenly interested in
increasing both production and exports in order to maximise revenue and keep the
economy growing steadily. Russian government’s central aim is to maximise
revenue from the oil and gas sectors, as about 40% of the state budget comes from
oil- and gas-related activities.
One of the major drawbacks for oil export dependent economies is that they can be
hurt by the impact of volatile oil export revenues on the exchange rate. A surge in
export revenues can lead to a surplus in a nation’s balance of payments, which
results in a stronger domestic currency. Foreign-exchange appreciation can have
some unexpected spillover effects for other parts of the economy. Appreciation of
domestic currency results in a loss of competitiveness in other economic sectors as
imports become cheaper and exports more expensive. Even if domestic currency
78
depreciates, local manufacturers of tradable goods who were disadvantaged when
the currency was strong may still be unable to fully capitalise on the improved
exchange-rate environment if the volatility in the currency discourages investment
in other industries.
MAINLY
1.Russia is the oil producing country. High prices of oil favorably affect the
country.
2. Brazil raw material and agricultural produce.
3.India it is IT services and for the large domestic consumer market size
4.China is increasingly playing the role of a high developed workbench for industrial countries
79
CONCLUSION
1.POSITIVE CORRELATION : There exist a positive correlation between the
equity market of all BRIC COUNTRIES. It means there are some common factors
80
which affects these countries. Following are the factors that could be the reasons
for the positive correlation of EQUITY MARKET OF BRIC COUNTRIES
LARGE POPULATION :- The BRIC nations represent over 40% of the
world’s population and occupy over a quarter of the world’s land area. As
the emerging middle class continues to develop, the BRIC nations will be a
significant consumer of goods and services. China is First, India is second,
Brazil on fifth, and Russia is on ninth position in population.
PREFERABLE DEMOGRAPHICAL PROFILE :- BRIC Countries
provide preferable demography profile to the investors. In India percentage
of young population is 63.5 , In China the percentage of young population
is 71.5, In Russia its 71.2% and in Brazil its 66.8.
HIGH CONSUMPTION: - Bric countries represent 40% of word's
population so they have high domestic consumption capacity because of
that these countries are still doing well in the period of recession. Growing
consumer spending in BRIC Countries also help them to face the financial
crisis.
RELATIVE POLITICAL STABILITY: - Political stability determines the
factors which determine economic growth such as investments (foreign
direct investment (FDI), stock market capitalization, private investment)
technologies which comes with FDI and skilled labor who migrate to
countries which have political stability. So political stability indirectly
determines economic growth. Bric countries have relative political stability.
2. AFFECT OF OIL PRICES ON BRIC COUNTRIES
81
The correlation between Oil price and BRIC countries is positive but in case of
China which shows it is not a oil producing country.
INDIA AND CHINA ;-India is net importer of oil so high prices of oil also
adversely affect the Indian Economy but high oil prices could also be result of an
overall bullish sentiments of FII's about the word economy. So the factors which
has lead high oil price in oil during 2005 to 2008 are also the factors which has
lead rise in the Equity of BRIC Countries. The same reasons exist for the
correlation of GOLD PRICE and Equity Market of BRIC COUNTRIES .The same
thesis hold true for China but probably to a lesser extent because China story is of
high manufacturing and export story but India story is primarily of high domestic
consumption story . For the net oil-importing countries of China and India, the
price of oil is a key determinant of inflation, the cost of production, the trade
balance and the strength of the currency.
BRAZIL AND RUSSIA: - Brazil and Russia are having different story so they are
favorably affected by oil prices and have different pattern. Russia is an oil
producing country so it affects favorability with high rate of oil prices. Volatile oil
prices have varying impacts on the BRIC’s economies. High oil prices help large
producers like Russia that rely on exports for fiscal revenue and foreign exchange.
Brazil, is now largely self-sufficient and has insulated its economy from oil price
shock on net basis.
3. AFFCT OF U.S. FINANCIAL CRISIS ON EQUITY MARKET OF BRIC
COUNTRIES
82
The present FINANCIAL CRISIS has adversely affected all the Equity Markets of
the World including BRIC Equity Market also. Global Economy is now days too
much interlinked even in decline these countries show positive correlation. This
may be due to the fact that as the economy went into recessionary mode there is a
high risk aversion on the parts of the global factors and FII's.
As the global economy has set to slow in 2009, BRIC economies are feeling the
consequences.
CHINA AND BRAZIL:-China and Brazil will see weaker demand from the USA
and Europe for their exports, China SSE Composite broke down the two year long
uptrend. The financial crisis has triggered downwards revisions in economic
growth in Brazil for 2009
RUSSIA AND INDIA :- Russia is probably the most vulnerable of the BRIC
countries, as its economy is the least diversified. Russia is heavily reliant on
hydrocarbon exports, accounting for half of export revenues in 2007. Oil prices
fell from US$147 per barrel in July 2008 to below US$70 in October 2008 amid
the global economic slowdown. Additionally, Russia is considered more risky by
foreign investors. India's economy depends on the services sector, accounting for
more than half of GDP. The sector has thrived on outsourcing from the developed
world. India's services sector, oriented towards developed economies. From
January 2008 to late October 2008, the Bombay Stock Exchange fell almost 50
percent, from above 20,000 to around 10,500.
We all know that equity is high risk high return asset class and as in the bullish
period it attracts more capital flow similarly in bearish period there is a
phenomenon of capital flight during risk time the global investor would prefer to
take whatever profit these emerging markets are offer and would park the same
money in more secure asset class like various debt based instrument. India's
services sector, oriented towards developed economies, suffered.
83
However, unlike other emerging economies, BRIC have large trade surpluses and
foreign exchange reserves that make them more resilient to the crisis. When the
markets will recover these are more likely to be chosen.
84
LIMITATIONS AND SUGGESTIONS
The present study has been carried out with the following limitations:
85
1. Combined correlation is not calculated. The analysis of Multiple variable is
not analysed.
2. Analysis is only a mean and not an end in itself. The analyst has to make
interpretation and draw his conclusions. Different people may interpret the
same analysis in different ways.
3. The country correlation is calculated on the basis of stock values at the end of
six month period from 2004 to 2009.
4. Due to only use of secondary data for the analysis there can be various errors
while using the information provided by secondary sources.
5. The better results could be achieved to study the monthly average values of the
stock and it will give more reliable results. Factor analysis and other statistical
measures can be used for better results.
86
87
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. www.google.com
2. www.nseindia.com
3. DIGAMBAR PATRI , D.N PATRI, QUNTITAVE TECHNIQUES (2007) Pg.No- 4.1-4.20
88
89