Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
C h a p t e r 1
INTRODUCTION
CONTENTS
1.1 Preamble 2
1.2 Review of background theory 4 1.2.1 Mixtures of materials 4
1.2.1.1 Phase diagrams 4 1.2.1.2 Miscibility 5 1.2.1.3 Partial Miscibility and changes in miscibility 5 1.2.1.4 Phase separation, USCT and LCST 6 1.2.1.5 Solid Solutions 8 1.2.1.6 Eutectics and Monotectics 8 1.2.1.7 Thermodynamics of Liquid Mixtures 11 1.2.1.8 Kinetics of Phase Transformations 12
1.2.2 Hydrogen Bonding 13 1.2.3 Small organic molecules 14
1.2.3.1 Melting and crystallisation 14 1.2.4 Polymers 14
1.2.4.1 Thermoplastics and Thermosets 15 1.2.4.2 Basics including molecular weight and molecular shape 15 1.2.4.3 Amorphous polymers 17 1.2.4.4 Polymer crystallinity 18 1.2.4.5 Lamellar melting 25 1.2.4.6 Melting behaviour of semicrystalline polymers 26 1.2.4.7 Spherulites 26 1.2.4.8 Poorly and partially crystallising polymer types 27 1.2.4.9 Polymer-polymer miscibility 27 1.2.4.10 Polymer-diluent systems 28
1.2.5 Linear polyamides (Nylons) 29 1.2.5.1 History of polyamides 29 1.2.5.2 Strengths 30 1.2.5.3 Weaknesses 31 1.2.5.4 Chemical structure and polyamide types 31 1.2.5.5 Biological-polyamide parallels 33 1.2.5.6 Polyamide Hydrogen Bonding 33 1.2.5.7 Polyamide Crystallinity 34 1.2.5.8 Polyamide Crystalline Structures 35 1.2.5.9 Effect of polyamide Type and Segment Length on Crystal Form 36 1.2.5.10 Multiple crystalline forms are possible - Polymorphism 38 1.2.5.11 Effect of pressure on crystallinity, melting temperature and crystal form 38 1.2.5.12 Metastability 39 1.2.5.13 Brill Temperature 39
1.3 Relevant papers in the area to be covered in the research 40 1.3.1 Small molecule-small molecule 40 1.3.2 Polymers with small molecules 40 1.3.3 Blend interactions and hydrogen bonding 41 1.3.4 Polyamides and Polymers 42
2
1.3.5 Polyamides and small molecules 43
1.4 The focus of the research project 45 1.4.1 Materials chosen 46
1.4.1.1 Polyamides 46 1.4.1.2 Small molecules 47
1.4.2 Sample blending and notation used for blends 49
1.5 Experimental Techniques Used 50 1.5.1 Thermogravimetric Analysis 50 1.5.2 Differential Scanning Calorimetry 51
1.5.2.1 Thermogram Overlays 53 1.5.2.2 Thermograms expected from thermal events 54 1.5.2.3 Assignment of “Spiky” Crystallisations to Carbazole or Phenothiazine 56 1.5.2.4 Phase diagrams derived from thermograms 57
1.5.3 Simultaneous Differential Thermal Analysis/Thermogravimetric Analysis 61 1.5.4 Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy 62
1.5.4.1 General 62 1.5.4.2 Mid Range IR and hydrogen bond Interactions 64 1.5.4.3 Mid Range IR Frequencies of Interest 65 1.5.4.4 Mid Infrared Data Analysis for Blends 67 1.5.4.5 Near Infrared FTIR (NIR) 71
1.5.5 Small Angle X-ray Scattering 72 1.5.6 Solid state Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy 73
1.6 Structure of the Thesis 74
1.7 Summary 75
1.1 Preamble Linear polyamides, commonly known as Nylons, have a broad range of
commercial applications. They are used widely where their high melting
temperatures, high heat stability, toughness and abrasion resistance can be
used to advantage. Detailed knowledge of their material properties is needed
to optimise their processability and properties when blended with other
materials for a variety of purposes such, as the formation of membranes.
This thesis contributes to the understanding of high temperature solutions
of semicrystalline linear polyamides melt blended with two different
crystallisable small-molecule organic compounds, carbazole and
phenothiazine. It also covers the crystallisation processes that take place
during solidification to room temperature. It concludes that the major factor
affecting the resulting nano- and microstructure of the solid is the relative
crystallisation temperature of pure polyamide and compound.
3
There has been much work on semicrystalline polymers blended with
amorphous polymers [1] . There is not a great deal in the literature on
semicrystalline polymers blended with semicrystalline polymers [2-6]. The
production of membranes with Thermally Induced Phase Separation (TIPS)
by using amorphous polymers with crystallisable small molecule diluents
has recently become an area of some interest for some people [7]. Little has
been reported on the area of semicrystalline polyamides melt blended with
small organic compounds [8]. Using the crystalline small organic molecules
affects crystallisation strongly because the small molecules are highly mobile
ahead of the crystallising polymer front.
The work therefore makes an important contribution to a somewhat
neglected area, particularly as it covers a range of polyamides with differing
repeat units, melting temperatures and crystal structures. An investigation
of these differences has led to a better understanding of high temperature
solutions of polyamides with some small organic molecules and of the
manner in which semicrystalline polyamides crystallise with normally highly
crystalline small molecules. It will also enhance our knowledge of complex
lamellar formation and small organic molecule crystallisation in a
semicrystalline combination of the two types of material.
The major tools for the investigation are Differential Scanning Calorimetry
(DSC), Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA) and Fourier transform infrared
spectroscopy (FTIR) in Mid-range infrared and the Near-range infrared (NIR).
The original purpose of this research had been to gain a better
understanding of crystallinity in linear polyamides and an appreciation of
how hydrogen bonding affects polymer crystallinity. The two types of small
molecules used are potential hydrogen bond disruptors. The research has
led to the different focus for the work because the two diluents were shown
later by Fourier transform infrared techniques not to interact in the solid
state by hydrogen bonding with polyamides. It was, however, recognised
that scientifically interesting questions arose from some of the experiments
that had been undertaken. These had been found with material from the
first sample made in an ampoule for producing bulk blends from the melt.
These larger quantities were to be used for several characterisation
techniques requiring bigger samples than the few milligrams that could be
4
produced in a DSC. The interesting results were the production of three very
separate sections of the sample with quite different colours, brick red, white
and fawn and of very different brittleness/hardness. Thermogravimetric
Analysis (TGA) showed that the weight percentage polyamide was different in
the samples and Differential Scanning (DSC) thermograms were also very
different for the three. These results are discussed fully in Chapter 3.
1.2 Review of background theory Much of the information covered in the next few sections may be found in
undergraduate textbooks on physical chemistry and materials science. It is,
however, still worthwhile to refresh our memories and briefly draw all the
basic concepts together to form the groundwork of the research environment
of the project. The topics are covered in a relatively superficial manner and
are meant only to lead the reader to the point where current research in the
field is discussed.
1.2.1 Mixtures of materials What happens when two different materials are put together in the same
environment at the same temperature and pressure will be explored. This
will provide a basis for what happens when polyamides are heated with
either carbazole or phenothiazine to the melt and then cooled down.
1.2.1.1 Phase diagrams
The main part of the research work covers mixtures of materials being
studied by DSC in solid and liquid states at pressures near one atmosphere.
In these conditions, the effects of ambient pressure are not intrusive in the
measurements. A simplification of the total equilibrium state is to only
consider solid and liquid phases, as will be done here. The maximum
number of degrees of freedom for a system with two components is three so
by fixing the ambient pressure at a nominal one atmosphere we can
effectively consider only the two variables, temperature and composition.
Equilibrium phase diagrams represent the different phases encountered in
latter parts of the text. The phase diagrams are plots of temperature against
composition with lines defining temperature/composition conditions that
lead to regions where there is a common phase. The liquidus is the line that
defines the lowest temperature where all material is in the liquid state. The
solidus is the line defining the highest temperatures where all the material is
5
in the solid state. There are regions in addition to the all-liquid and all-solid
states where there is a liquid coexisting with one or another solid material.
The materials are considered to be in the ideal equilibrium conditions in the
discussion immediately below. The reality of the experimental conditions is
that the work has been done in non-equilibrium conditions and this will
cause some modification of the outcomes. The major experimental
technique used in the work was Differential Scanning Calorimeter (DSC) and
from the DSC output we can observe some of the physical changes that take
place with melting and crystallisation. The melting and crystallisation peaks
can be interpreted to give an understanding of the underlying phase
diagrams, although with the caveat that the observations may not lie at
exactly the phase boundaries for equilibrium phase diagrams.
1.2.1.2 Miscibility
It is instructive to first discuss liquids before discussing multiphase solids.
Two liquids are miscible in each other when the molecules of one material
are completely dispersed in another at an atomic level for all concentrations,
such as ethanol in water. It is common to talk of solvent and solute where
one material (the solvent) is in substantial excess. This becomes more
difficult in many of the cases to be discussed in this thesis because
concentrations ranging from just over 20% polyamide to 83% polyamide are
encountered as well as the pure materials. General usage of solvent is not
necessarily the best because there will be a number of cases where the
liquids are not in solution at specific temperatures. A more general word
that will be used is diluent, which is suitable for all cases here. In most
cases, the terms will not be raised and only the weight percentage polyamide
referred to.
1.2.1.3 Partial Miscibility and changes in miscibility
Partial miscibility occurs when one liquid can only be added to another to a
certain limit and then will not dissolve further. The two materials will
separate out from one another into two layers if there is a difference in
density or into droplets/blobs of one material in the other if there is little
density difference. It should be noted here that there will be at least a small
amount of material A dissolved in material B and vice versa, even if the
materials are essentially immiscible, such as water and oil.
6
Liquid combinations that are immiscible at one temperature can often
become miscible at other temperatures. For example if a mixture of phenol
and water is heated to over 65 0C it becomes miscible.
1.2.1.4 Phase separation, USCT and LCST
0 50 100 Percentage of Material B
Tem
pera
ture
Upper Critical Solution Temperature
(UCST)
Solution of A and B
A and B not in stable solution
Figure 1-1 Example of phase diagram with Upper Critical Solution
Temperature.
0 50 100 Percentage of Material B
Tem
pera
ture
Solution of B in A
Solution of A in B
A and B not in stable solution
A and B not in stable solution
Figure 1-2 Example of Phase diagram with immiscible region but no UCST or
LCST.
0 50 100Percentage of Material B
Tem
pera
ture
Solution of A and B
Lower CriticalSolution Temperature
(LCST)
A and Bnot instable
solution
Figure 1-3 Example of phase diagram
with Lower Critical Solution Temperature.
0 50 100 Percentage of Material B
Tem
pera
ture
Solution of A and B
A and B unstable and
spinodally decompose
Binodal line
Spinodal line
Metastable regions
Figure 1-4 Example of binodal and spinodal lines in a phase diagram.
The phenol/water case is an example of an Upper Critical Solution
Temperature (UCST) where there is a maximum temperature at which the
materials are not completely soluble. A typical phase diagram is given in
Figure 1-1 The UCST does not have to lie at the centre of the concentration
7
range but is often very strongly towards one or the other side of the phase
diagram. There are also cases with some materials where there is a Lower
Critical Solution Temperature (LCST) and once the temperature has been
raised sufficiently the two materials begin to separate into separate phases.
That can be seen in Figure 1-3. Another case is shown in Figure 1-2, where
there is no upper or lower critical temperature but a region in mid
concentrations where the materials are insoluble. Utracki [9] in his work on
polymer/polymer miscibility states that UCST is more common in general
with solvent-polymer and LCST with polymer-polymer systems. There are
regions in composition-temperature space where the two materials cannot
exist stably in a single, miscible, phase. This line is called the binodal curve.
A metastable condition is often reached where the two materials still coexist
without separating if the density of the two materials does not differ
markedly. Another region exists within the binodal curve where the single
phase nature of the liquid becomes completely impossible. That inner
boundary is called the spinodal. Inside it the two materials will begin to
phase separate spontaneously. An example showing the spinodal in a phase
diagram is given in
Figure 1-4. Spinodal decomposition takes place throughout the mixed liquid
with very small volumes segregating themselves into like kinds of materials.
This is energetically unfavourable because of the high interfacial surface
area. Over a period of time, volumes of like material touch each other and
reduce surface area by coalescing. The entities of each material
progressively become bigger, as in Figure 1-5.
Figure 1-5 Ripening over time of small spinodally decomposed regions on the left to larger ones on the right.
This can happen by Ostwald ripening where domains at a greater radius
than some critical value grow at a faster rate by diffusion from the
surrounding medium. It can also happen by coalescence of droplets or by
hydrodynamic effects [10].
8
The example shown has near equal amounts of each material but, when the
two materials are there in different proportions, droplets of one material can
exist in a matrix of the other material. Concentration changes encountered
by addition of one material or crystallisation can lead to a phase inversion
where the dominant body can become the droplets in the other.
The two materials are in a metastable situation if they are quenched to a
position on the phase diagram between the binodal and the spinodal.
Statistical density fluctuations often lead to phase separation by nucleation
and growth when the mixture is in the metastable region.
1.2.1.5 Solid Solutions
Solids can also form solutions in the same way that liquids do. It is the
ability of the solids to mix in all proportions of the basic materials that is the
criteria for a solid solution. In this case, though, the phase of the solution is
a solid rather than a liquid. An example of this is copper with gold.
1.2.1.6 Eutectics and Monotectics
There are many cases where solids are not significantly soluble in each
other but the liquids become soluble when the temperature is raised
sufficiently. One example of this is common solder used in electronics
where a eutectic is formed. Eutectic is Greek for “easy melting”. A
eutectic reaction is defined [11] to be:
“An isothermal, reversible reaction between two (or more) solid
phases during the heating of a system, as a result of which a single
liquid phase is produced.”
In these cases the phase diagram is similar to Figure 1-6. We see six regions
in the figure. The first has both together as a solution (in the melt). The
second and third regions α and β are solid solutions with one or the other of
the materials in virtually pure solid form with a small amount of the other
material dissolved in it up to the solubility limit. The fourth and fifth have
one of α or β as excess solid in equilibrium with the solution. The sixth is
where materials α and β are together in solid form. This last usually has a
finely divided matrix of α in β (or vice versa) with an overall concentration of
the eutectic composition. Within that are larger domains of any excess α or
β form.
9
Consider solidified material after cooling from a molten mixture of materials
A and B and having a concentration and temperature defined by point c in
Figure 1-6. Material A is in excess so the solid will comprise nearly pure
material A inclusions (of phase α) with the same composition as m solidified
within a matrix of a solid eutectic mix of A and B (m and n with overall
composition of e). The solid will reach d as it is heated. At that point, the
eutectic portion will melt at the eutectic temperature (Te) into a liquid of the
eutectic composition, leaving the inclusions of α in equilibrium with the
liquid.
100
120
140
160
180
200
0 50 100
Percentage of Material B
Tem
pera
ture
(
0 C)
solid α + β
liquid
n
α + liquid
e
β + liquid
α β
h
f
m
d
g
j
k
c
Figure 1-6 A simple phase diagram showing eutectic formation.
A further increase in temperature will see some of the solid inclusions
changing composition along the line f-g as A dissolves into the liquid. This
causes the composition of the liquid to move along the line e-h as the
material α dissolves into it. The strong move of the liquid to the left with
increasing temperature means that a considerable amount of α is dissolving
into the liquid. Eventually the composition of the liquid will become the same
as the original proportions of the two materials in the solid at the time the
last of the α phase of composition g dissolves into the liquid. Further heating
maintains the composition at c-h and the liquid moves on the phase diagram
in the direction of j.
10
Consider the alternative of a solution having a concentration and
temperature defined by point j in Figure 1-6. The state of the solution will
reach h as it is cooled. At that point, material A will begin to crystallise out
in nearly pure form as phase α with a composition given by point g across
the tie line linking compositions in equilibrium at that temperature. The
removal of phase α by crystallisation will naturally increase the relative
concentration of B in the solution as the temperature is lowered slightly.
The solution will thus follow the curved line towards point e as the
temperature is lowered further with continuing crystallisation of phase α.
The material crystallising will vary slightly in composition following the line
g-f. The lowest temperature where the liquid can coexist with solid is at
point e. The liquid cannot exist below the eutectic temperature so the
remaining liquid (of the eutectic composition) will crystallise at that point in
the cooling process. The final solid will incorporate solid, nearly pure A in a
matrix. That matrix is phase separated A-rich and B-rich micro domains
overall having the eutectic composition. On average, the solid will obviously
have the composition proportions of the two materials in the original
solution.
The above descriptions for the phase diagram are for equilibrium at all
times. Heating under practical conditions may mean that the composition of
the α inclusions may not have time to change from f to that of g. There may
be kinetic delays meaning that at faster heating rates some steps take place
a little later (at higher temperatures). The situation is more complicated
where we start with two powders A and B placed together. The powders will
reach the eutectic temperature where the points of contact between the two
types of powder will start to dissolve those grains of the powders. This will
continue until all of B powder is consumed, leaving pure powder A (in this
case) in the liquid of the eutectic composition. Further increases above the
eutectic temperature will result in the dissolution of powder A into the liquid,
moving the composition of the liquid along line e-h, as previously. The
practical implementation of eutectic formation from powders may result in
further delays than when starting with an α-in-eutectic solid. We will see
later that polymers often partly crystallise forming nanometre-thick
crystallites that tend to exclude other molecules. It may be expected that the
melting of a previously solidified mixture incorporating a semicrystalline
11
polymer will behave in a fashion intermediate between two powders melting
and that for eutectic mixes of small molecules or metals.
The phase diagram seen in Figure 1-6 is one with a simple eutectic
relationship between the materials. Many, more complicated, types of phase
diagrams are found in practice with various material combinations. A
simpler phase diagram occurs with the side regions disappearing when the
solubility of one solid material in the other is totally insignificant.
A monotectic reaction is similar to a eutectic reaction but here a solid and a
liquid solidify (reversibly) from monotectic liquid. The compositions of the
solid and liquid are both different from that of the originating liquid. It is
possible to have multiple very small regions of liquid dispersed within a solid
matrix as a result of a monotectic reaction. Those liquid domains can then
solidify at lower temperatures.
IUPAC [11] define a monotectic reaction as:
“The reversible transition, on cooling, of a liquid to a mixture of a second liquid and a solid.”
1.2.1.7 Thermodynamics of Liquid Mixtures
Liquid mixtures, like other systems, are characterised by normal
thermodynamic parameters such as Gibbs free energy G, internal energy U,
enthalpy H, entropy S and volume V. The values found for real mixtures are
not the sums of the values of the pure constituents. For example, mixing a
volume of one liquid with an equal amount of another liquid will not give
exactly twice the volume of the first material. The same applies to the Gibbs
free energy. The difference between the actual free energy G and the sum of
the Gibbs free energies of the pure components Gi is the free energy of
mixing ∆Gmix. Similar comments apply to entropy and enthalpy with the
convention that the value for the mixture takes on the sign of the
subtraction of the sum of the components from the value for the real system.
This means. ∆Ymix = Y - (Y1 + Y2 +…+Yn), where Y is a thermodynamic
parameter and the values of Y with subscripts are those for the n pure
materials in the system.
There is a partial molar property for any of the above in a system defined as
the partial derivative of that property with respect to the number of moles of
one constituent when temperature, pressure and the number of moles of all
12
the other components are kept constant. The partial molar Gibbs free energy
is the same as a parameter called the chemical potential of that constituent.
It is usually given the symbol µi.
These chemical potentials of the constituents are the quantities that
determine phase equilibria and from them we can derive a range of other
parameters. It is worth mentioning here that the chemical potential of a
pure material will be the same as the molar Gibbs free energy of the material
at the particular temperature and pressure of interest, ie. µi0 = Gi0.
This discussion is general to mixtures of liquids but will play a part in the
discussion later of the Flory-Huggins theory as it relates to polymers in
solutions.
1.2.1.8 Kinetics of Phase Transformations
Most transformations from one state into another do not take place
instantaneously because of impediments to the changes. Often energy
barriers related to the phase boundaries have to be overcome for the
molecules to be able to re-arrange themselves. There is usually a nucleation
stage followed by a growth stage. The whole process is time dependent.
The nucleation is the formation of stable microscopic particles of the new
phase in the originating phase.
This is followed by the growth of new material onto the nuclei. The growth of
the new material proceeds by diffusion into the old phase. It occurs until all
the volumes of new phase impinge on each other making the system wholly
the new phase.
The time taken for the change to take place is termed kinetics and is
obviously important for production processes. The rate at which the volume
of material changes from one state into another will be dependent upon how
much of the old state remains if we hold the temperature constant. The
outcome is an “S” shaped curve Figure 1-7 below that is described by the
Avrami equation in Equation 1-1 [12-14].
13
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 40 80 120 160 200
Time (sec)
Per
cent
age
Pha
se
Tran
sitio
n
Figure 1-7 A typical Avrami plot for extent of crystallisation taking
place.
Y = 1-exp(-ktn) Eqn (1-1)
where Y is the volume fraction of crystalline material formed by time t at
constant temperature, and k is a variable dependent on temperature. The
exponent n should be an integer between 1 and 4, depending on the model
used, according to the original theory. Nowadays it is regarded as a variable
to match the data.
The Avrami approach is a simple one that has found application across a
wide variety of phase transitions. It is often used for crystallisation of metals
but is used for polymers [15, 16] as well.
1.2.2 Hydrogen Bonding We will now look at the hydrogen bonding that plays a strong part in the
behaviour of polyamides and the different types of bonding encountered in
chemistry.
Most people are familiar with ionic and covalent bonds. Ionic bonds take
place with the complete transfer of electrons from one atom to another and
are very strong. Covalent bonds are directed between two atoms such as
C-C or C-N and are also strong. Covalent bonds have energies in the order
of 300kJ/mol. The much weaker van der Waals forces are of the order of
1kJ/mol and are non-specific in direction.
Hydrogen bonds are intermediate in strength (around 30kJ/mol) and act
between hydrogen atoms and two other electronegative atoms, usually from
the group oxygen, nitrogen and the halides, particularly fluorine. They are
essentially electrostatic in nature. They act when hydrogen has been
covalently bonded to one of the above highly electronegative group that has
14
drawn some of the charge from the hydrogen atom. This makes the
hydrogen atom partially positive in charge. An atom in another molecule or
another part of the same molecule that is also electronegative will be weakly
attracted to the hydrogen atom, forming a hydrogen bond (or hydrogen
bridge).
Probably the most important case of hydrogen bond formation is with water
where an O-H from one water molecule is bonded to the O of another water
molecule. Hydrogen bonds are continually forming and reforming, even in
water near 100 0C. The reason the water in our own bodies does not
evaporate at sub-zero temperatures is the hydrogen bonding that provides
an energy barrier to evaporation. It is also hydrogen bonding forces that link
the peptide groups of DNA into a double helix. We will see later that
hydrogen bond formation is implicit in the physical properties of the
polyamides (Nylons) of this research.
1.2.3 Small organic molecules 1.2.3.1 Melting and crystallisation
Small organic molecules in the solid state are arranged in a very regular,
symmetrical manner, held in place by van der Waals and possibly hydrogen
bonding forces. These forces will be stronger if the molecules can fit closely
together with as many atoms of one molecule as close as possible to atoms of
the next. The covalent forces holding each molecule together are much
higher than the inter-molecular forces. The atoms gain in vibrational and
rotational energy as the temperature is raised until the structure breaks
down suddenly and a disordered liquid state results. The reverse occurs as
the temperature is lowered and the molecules can nestle together in an
ordered structure. A better physical fit between the molecules will result in
stronger van der Waals forces between the molecules and a higher melting
temperature.
1.2.4 Polymers The Greek word poly means many and the word meros means part.
Polymers are macromolecules (very large molecules) made from the
combination of a large number of smaller repeating molecular units
(monomers) to create a larger molecule. They occur naturally as in DNA or
silk and can be manufactured synthetically as in Nylons and cured epoxy.
This research covers synthetic homopolymers made from only one sort of
15
repeat unit unlike copolymers where there are polymer sections of differing
types within the one molecular chain. They can be structured as long
chains, with or without sidechains, networks, or dendrimers. This work is
on long linear polymers without sidechains.
1.2.4.1 Thermoplastics and Thermosets
Polymers are of two types, thermoplastic and thermosetting. Thermosetting
polymers result from the in-situ reaction of smaller molecules where covalent
crosslinkages form between the molecules during polymerisation, resulting
in a network. Subsequent reheating of the solid will not allow the material
to liquefy once the polymerisation reaction has been performed. Eventually
degradation occurs with the application of further heat. Thermoplastic
polymers can undergo multiple cycles of the polymer softening and becoming
liquid with heat and hardening on cooling. The polymer chains gain
sufficient vibrational energy to break the weak van der Waals forces between
the polymer molecules during this reversible process although this usually
takes longer than with small molecules because of the greater number of
molecular interactions involved with these large molecules. This type of
polymer can be processed in the melt by injection moulding, casting, blow
moulding and spinning to form solids of the required form on cooling. The
research here is on thermoplastic polymers.
1.2.4.2 Basics including molecular weight and molecular shape
The number of repeat units in a polymer molecule affects the size of the total
molecule in solution or the melt. This, in turn, affects the viscosity in
solution and the melting temperature. Commercial polymers often have
molecular weights of 20 to 50 kilodaltons.
Reactions to make polymers from monomeric units normally do not mean
that all molecules form at exactly the same molecular weight. There is
usually a distribution of molecular weights from a polymerisation process.
This means that the physical properties of a polymer such as viscosity are
an average over all chain lengths represented in the sample. The degree of
polymerisation, n, will be a distribution with a number average, Mn, that is
less than the weight average, Mw. The ratio of the two is called the
polydispersity and is a measure of the broadness of the molecular weight
distribution.
16
Polymer chains have the opportunity to become entangled, spaghetti-like,
when in solution or the melt if they are sufficiently long. Viscosity is
increased markedly once entanglement has set in and the dynamics of
crystallisation are also altered [17, 18]. The number of repeat units before
entanglement becomes an issue is different between polymers and depends
on whether the polymer is a plain linear chain or has side chains, and on
other characteristics of the repeat units.
The distance between atoms of different polymer chains is a balance between
attractive van der Waals forces and Born repulsion between the clouds of
electrons surrounding each atom. The bond lengths between covalently
bonded atoms in the one molecular chain attempt to remain at their
equilibrium distances. At the same time, the bonds try to stay at their
optimum angles. Every atom in a polymer chain attempts to find an
energetically favourable position for itself under the constraints of bond
angles and interatomic distances. The application of more heat to a system
results in greater vibration of atoms around their optimum positions. We
will see later that the multiple forces acting on an atom can be utilised in
Fourier transform infrared techniques to characterise the environments of
atoms by their frequencies of vibration.
Polymer chain molecules are not straight. Usually the bonds are at preferred
angles other than 1800 and, unless sterically hindered by some of the atoms,
are able to rotate when in the melt or in solution. This results in a three-
dimensional “random walk” if the path in space is followed from one atom to
the next as displayed in two dimensions in Figure 1-8. The length of the
chain from one end to the other can be seen to be much greater than the
end-to-end distance along the straight line A-B. The size of the molecule can
be characterised statistically for a given situation with the radius of gyration
as a measure of how large the molecule is. That is determined by the mass
average of the square root of the squares of distances of the atoms from the
centre of mass of the molecule. A flexible molecule that is in thermal motion
requires that a time average be taken over all configurations.
The thermal vibrations in a melt at high temperature will tend to result in a
larger radius of gyration. The size of a polymer chain in a poor solvent will
be much smaller than with a good solvent because the chain segments tend
to keep to similar chemical environments. They retract to a smaller volume
17
to exclude unfavourable solvent molecule interactions. This also occurs with
proteins in an aqueous environment where the hydrophobic portions bury
themselves at the centre away from the solvent and the hydrophilic portions
extend into their watery surrounds.
Figure 1-8 Random walk between A and B, the ends of the polymer chain.
A linear polymer chain, such as with the Nylons of this text, will have a
larger radius of gyration than one of the same molecular weight but with
branches emanating from the main chain.
1.2.4.3 Amorphous polymers
Polymers can solidify into the amorphous state where, firstly, the
longitudinal motion is locked in, making the polymer solid but rubbery.
When the material reaches the glass transition temperature (Tg), it becomes
like a glassy, supercooled liquid as it is cooled further. Here, the motion
allowed by molecular vibrations and rotations becomes much more
restricted. Thermal conductivity, dielectric constants and mechanical
properties undergo significant changes at similar (but usually not quite
identical) temperatures. The glass transition temperature (Tg) for a particular
parameter is the point at which half the step change has taken place.
Polymers are very stiff below their Tg but they become rubbery as the
temperature is raised again. Eventually they become viscous liquids that
quickly thin further as the temperature is progressively raised. The process
is completely reversible unless the temperature has been raised so high that
the polymer has degraded.
An example of the viscosity behaviour as temperature is raised for an
amorphous polymer is shown in Figure 1-9.
18
Temperature
Visc
osity
|
Tg
Figure 1-9 Typical effect of temperature on viscosity for amorphous thermoplastic polymers. Viscosity is extremely high below the Glass Transition temperature Tg and rapidly drops with increasing temperature.
The hole theory of liquids requires there to be minute voids between the
molecules that allow them to move from one position to another. If we
extend this to polymers we must recognise that the molecules of a polymer
chain have to move cooperatively. This requires a minimum void size to
allow chain segments to move from one location to another. The free volume
will increase rapidly with temperature above this critical temperature. The
free volume of a polymer will remain relatively constant below this
temperature as molecular motion is frozen.
1.2.4.4 Polymer crystallinity
The discussion in this and the following four sections is only meant to
provide a general background for discussion of various aspects of polymer
crystallinity in the main chapters dealing with specific polyamide-diluent
combinations.
Over fifty years ago it was found that approximately three quarters of
different types of polymers are able to also enter a partially crystalline state.
This can happen for those types of polymers if the cooling conditions are
slower, or if solid amorphous polymer is taken through an appropriate
thermal history that allows a solid-state crystallisation to take place. The
degree of crystallinity will depend on the thermal and mechanical history of
the sample and can range from zero to 90%. It is this crystallisation that
adds to the mechanical stability of many manufactured plastic articles.
Generally, as the cooling rate during crystallisation increases, the percentage
in the amorphous state increases and crystallinity decreases. Polyethylene
19
and polyethylene oxide tend to have very high crystallinity and others have
much less, ranging down to those that cannot be crystallised.
Polyamide-4,6 being studied here can crystallise up to 70% by volume under
favourable conditions.
Lamellae are crystalline regions within the overall amorphous polymer. The
order caused by polymer chains (and parts of polymer chains) aligning
themselves means regularity in the structure of atoms, allowing Bragg
reflections to be seen with X-Rays in the manner seen with crystalline
mineralisations.
Whether a crystallisable polymer solidifies purely with an amorphous
structure or with a certain extent of crystallisation will depend upon a range
of parameters that can also affect the crystallographic form. The thermal
history as well as the molecular weight will also play a strong part. A final
crystalline state, probably metastable, will depend on nucleation states and
entropic barriers. Other factors that can affect the way in which the final
crystal form develops are the degree of undercooling, recrystallisation and
the lamellar thickening or thinning mentioned below.
The crystallisation takes the form of lamellae (platelet like structures or
crystallites several micrometres across and 5 to 10 nm thick) as seen in
Figure 1-10.
Figure 1-10 Keller’s diagram [19] for the laying down of folded polymer chains along the edge faces of lamellae
The larger, flat surfaces are called the basal planes and the thin surfaces
along the edges (and joining the basal planes) are called edge faces. Long
polymer chains are generally considered [19] to fold backwards and forwards
into place across the edge faces of lamellae crystallising from the melt or
solution. These energetically unfavourable assemblies come about mainly
because of the attempts of long polymer molecules to rearrange themselves
20
into energetically more favourable structures with greater order. They are, of
course, restricted in their ability to “reptate” like snakes into ideal positions
in reasonable timescales. Kinetics plays an important role in the perfection
attained.
Shorter polymer chains can crystallise in an extended chain form where
molecules line up together, side by side, without chain folding. This is a
lower energy configuration because there are no folds necessary. For
example, PEG usually forms folded chains in the lamellae only when the
molecular weight exceeds approximately 4,000 Daltons [20, 21]. The
extended chains become difficult to lay side by side when they are too long.
Layers are added on the edge faces to build up the thin lamellae from their
centre with chain folds in a consistent manner dependent upon steric effects
with the atoms and energy minimisation. The folding is driven by kinetic
factors because the initial nucleus has polymer chains locked into the folded
form.
The lamellae formed in solution are usually more perfect than those formed
in the melt because there is more opportunity for polymer chains to easily
orient themselves correctly by displacing the smaller solvent molecules.
Later growth of the lamellae by secondary nucleation of chains onto the edge
faces of the crystals continues the original folding form but often the
thickness of the lamellae vary as they grow bigger. It is common for
polymer lamellae to thicken if they are later annealed for some time at
temperatures somewhat below the melting temperature. That occurs by
polymer chains reptating like snakes in the lamellae to produce the more
thermodynamically stable thicker configuration. The ends of molecules
withdraw from their initial place in the lamella during the reptation process.
It has been found [22] that lamellar thinning also occurred with some semi-
rigid polymers, including polyamides.
The lamellae can often form in different crystallographic structures.
Generally the lamellar thickness increases with molecular weight and the
melting temperature also increases.
The lamellar thickness generally depends on the temperature of
crystallisation in polymers. The thickness of a lamella is reduced when
crystallisation takes place at a larger undercooling. The lamellae do not
have time to form in thicker, more energetically favourable forms when
21
driven by high supercooling. The significant surface energy tied up in thin
lamellae makes them less stable, in general, than thicker ones. This leads to
the melting temperature of thinner lamellae being reduced below that of an
infinitely large crystal. The melting temperature approaches an asymptotic
value as the molecular weight tends towards infinity.
Gibbs and Duhem were able to relate the equilibrium melting temperature,
Tm0 to the measured melting temperature Tm using the lamellar thickness l,
the enthalpy of fusion ∆Hf and σe from the slope of the graph of Tm against
1/l. Hoffman and Weeks [23, 24] took this further by eliminating the need to
know the lamellar thickness with the use of plots of Tm against the
crystallisation temperature Tx under the same ramp rates. Measured values
for the pair are extrapolated to the line Tm = Tx and that gives the equilibrium
value 0mT .
The Hoffman-Weeks approach has been extended with linear and non-linear
extrapolations by Marand, Xu and Srinivas [25]. On the other hand Welch
and Muthukumar [26] believe that a reliable estimate of equilibrium melting
temperatures cannot be obtained by this method.
We must consider two aspects for crystallisation to take place, the
nucleation of lamellae formation and the kinetics of lamellar growth. There
is the primary nucleation of lamellae as a first stage and then and then the
growth stage with secondary nucleation.
The primary nucleation can be likened to atoms in a gas condensing with
lowered temperature to form small groups with a high surface area to
volume ratio. This situation is unfavourable with much energy tied up in the
surface compared to the free energy gain by condensation to a liquid. The
group will dissociate unless sufficient atoms can simultaneously coalesce to
make a nucleus that can grow. That is because the increase in volume
produces a lower energy than the increase in surface area. The process
relies on statistical fluctuations at high temperature. These intermediate
groups then produce nuclei that can grow further. The formation of lamellar
nuclei in molten polymer or in solution, are generally regarded as analogous
to the gas-liquid condensation described above. An embryo lamella accretes
and loses adjoining sections of polymer chain in a dynamic manner until it is
large enough that the free energy gains outweigh the surface energy effects.
22
It is able to become a lamellar nucleus for further growth. This is a type of
situation with a hurdle to overcome where the Avrami approach is
applicable.
The major theory or model put forward to cover the secondary nucleation and
growth of lamellae once they have nucleated and begun to grow is that of
Hoffman and Lauritzen [27, 28]. In that theory there is assumed to be a flat
existing substrate. A new polymer chain lays down on the flat surface of the
edge face beside the previous chain and becomes attached to both. The
question then arises as to when it folds. An attempt to maximise the contact
area and bonding for the new chain will lead to longer lengths between folds
and result in thicker lamellae. The necessity to achieve this quickly when
there are strong driving forces towards crystallisation means a shorter length
between folds is desirable. The final lamellar thickness is thus dependent
upon the interplay between these opposing tendencies. The outcome is that
larger undercoolings result in thinner lamellae.
Often crystallisation also takes place more slowly behind the main
crystallisation front on the lamellae. This is called secondary crystallisation
and results in increased densification of the solid, particularly because the
slower rate of crystallisation results in more perfect (and denser) crystalline
regions. Diluent in the melt blend systems studied here will mean that
secondary crystallisation effects for the polymers will be promoted due to
dilution but be reduced by lower viscosity of the uncrystallised
polymer-diluent material. The outcomes cannot be predicted and would
require other techniques such as time resolved SAXS measurements to
determine. An analogous situation can be seen to occur for the diluent with
mini spikes occasionally being seen well after the main diluent
crystallisation peak such as with 65PA46Car in Figure 3-14 where there is a
small diluent crystallisation spike 30 0C lower than the main carbazole
crystallisation peak. Androsch and Wunderlich [29] showed with studies on
poly(ethylene-co-octene) using Temperature Modulated Differential Scanning
Calorimetry (TMDSC) that secondary crystallisation occurred with a delay of
5 min after primary crystallisation when cooling at 10 0C/min.
There is, however, much controversy over the steps that take place in going
through from the supercooled melt to the formation of crystals.
23
Olmsted et al. [30] suggest that there is liquid-liquid spinodal decomposition
taking place prior to the formation of crystals. The spinodal decomposition
was detected by Small Angle X-ray Scattering (SAXS).The actual crystal
formation was detected by Wide Angle X-ray Diffraction (WAXD). They base
this in part on work by others eg Ezquerra [31] on a variety of polymers
where SAXS signals are seen to increase and partially decay before the
WAXD signal appears in simultaneous SAXS-WAXD. They propose that
there are statistical fluctuations in density and entropy (linked) which result
in spinodal decomposition of the molten polymer into denser and less dense
phases. It is the more ordered, dense regions (detected by SAXS) that later
crystallise into the lamellae detected by WAXD. The direct experimental
results are supported by Monte Carlo simulations by Toma, Toma and
Subirana [32] where they investigate the formation of a compact globule
state with a lamellar conformation prior to the creation of a crystal. More
recently Jiang et al. [33] and other groups have found similar precursor
activity with other polymers examined with Fourier transform infrared
spectroscopy (FTIR) in situ during crystallisation and there are some
parallels in the recent work of Rabani, Reichman, Geissler and Brus [34] on
the formation of nanoparticle structures during drying.
Welch and Muthukumar [26] suggest entropic barriers are involved initially,
that chains attach themselves to the growing crystal in line with the existing
chains and that lamellar thickening takes place at a later stage in a
cooperative fashion.
Wurm and Schick [35] heated poly(ε-caprolactone) and syndiotactic
poly(propylene) with small laser pulses and presented evidence towards a
model with crystallisation first taking place by a partially ordered metastable
structure in the melt that becomes progressively more ordered into a
lamellar crystal as it undergoes a stabilisation stage.
Doye and Frenkel [36] disagree with the Hoffman-Lauritzen theory as to how
it predicts lamellar thickness and attempt to improve aspects of the
Sadler-Gilmer approach which is based on entropic barriers.
There are a number of other theories that also try to overcome the
weaknesses of the Hoffman-Lauritzen theory that was a major step forwards
over forty years ago. It is the Olmsted et al. approach that we will later see
24
supported in one aspect of the research being presented in this thesis. That
aspect is the minor phase separation seen in certain cases during
crystallisation and later re-melting.
The picture of lamellar structure and formation presented by Keller,
Lauritzen and Hoffman and others is an ideal one. In practice the loops of
the chain folds can either be close ones or they can re-enter the lamella
some distance away as in a “telephone switchboard” model.
Often a group of polymer chains will cluster together to form a lamella but
some of the sections of some chains will also be incorporated in other
lamellae. The intervening sections will meander through the amorphous
region between the lamellae.
A high undercooling below the melting temperature, either by rapid dropping
of temperature to a desired isothermal crystallisation temperature or by fast
dynamic cooling, leads to strong driving forces for crystallisation. The short
crystallisation period, which results from the strong driving force, does not
allow as much time for polymer chains to reorganise themselves into
favourable configurations. A far from ideal structure is then locked in.
The kinetics of crystallisation is strongly affected by the cooling rate, as
mentioned above. The crystallisation temperature is lowered as the cooling
rate is increased. Usually the amount of material that becomes crystalline is
reduced and the speed of crystallisation increases [37] with faster cooling,
resulting in a highly amorphous solid if the material is quenched, for
example, into ice water or liquid nitrogen.
It has been explained above that the question of crystallisation kinetics is a
complex one, even in the situation where crystallisation takes place
isothermally. There are good reasons for also wanting to study
crystallisation in a non-isothermal or “dynamic” context. That is the way
crystallisation takes place in almost every production environment so an
understanding of the processes under conditions emulating real life is also
needed [38].
There is also another consideration when crystallising a range of blends
where there may be multiple crystallisations. The temperature(s) for
isothermal crystallisation have to be chosen specifically for each particular
blend [6] and a wrong choice will obscure the information being sought. It
25
would be difficult to obtain meaningful results from a comparison between a
number of blended materials where the melting temperatures of the
constituents differ markedly. This is particularly so when differing
compositions of any pair being blended could lead to differing crystallisation
temperature depressions.
A practical solution is using non-isothermal crystallisation so that
crystallisation takes place when the molecules are ready for crystallisation at
the cooling rate used. A faster cooling ramp leads to a greater undercooling
before the crystallisation takes place because of kinetic factors. The
crystallisation does actually take place at near isothermal conditions
because the self-generated temperature field from the latent heat of
crystallisation does tend to maintain the local temperature in a pseudo-
isothermal condition during the crystallisation. Some authors utilise this
self generated pseudo-isothermal crystallisation in their own manner to
achieve specific undercoolings that would otherwise be difficult to achieve
[39]. It is not an ideal situation from a theoretical perspective but does
provide a practical way of solving the conundrum in those cases.
1.2.4.5 Lamellar melting
The melting of lamellae of monodisperse polymers takes place over a greater
temperature range than for small organic molecules or metals. This is
because the long polymer chains have to reorganise themselves and
dissociate themselves into the melt from their places attached to the side
faces of the lamellae. That process takes time and is at least partly
sequential with one layer being removed before the next one can also escape
into the melt.
The process of melting (some) individual chains from a number of lamellae
has been detected with polymer chains partly disengaging themselves into
the melt and recrystallising those sections onto the lamellae [40]. This was
carried out by using quasi-isothermal TMDSC using a very small amplitude
of the temperature oscillations. The reason for the small oscillations in
temperature was to keep the chains partly tethered to the lamellae so that
there was no barrier to recrystallising back onto the same lamellae.
The energy barrier to re-nucleation just referred to is a contributor to the
substantial difference in melting and crystallisation temperatures found for
polymers. It is necessary to have a substantial undercooling of perhaps
26
10-30 0C before the formation of lamellae takes place. That is the case even
when there are nucleation sites present from nucleating agents that have
been added to the polymer, or because the original melting of crystalline
regions was incomplete. This is discussed below.
Different lengths of polymer chain have slightly different melting
temperatures with higher molecular weight polymers having higher melting
temperatures than lower molecular weight polymers. The influence of this is
much greater at low molecular weights and negligible at high molecular
weights where the predominant factors are lamellar thickness and crystal
perfection. For example, Smith and St.John Manley [41] point to quasi-
monodisperse fractions of polyethylene with Mw = 1000 having a melting
temperature of 105 0C, that rising to 121 0C for Mw = 2000 but only rising
further to 131 0C for a molecular weight of 20,000. The same relationship
applies for crystallisation. Polydisperse polymers, as found in the real world,
therefore have wider melting and crystallisation temperature ranges than
monodisperse polymers and far wider than for small organic molecules.
1.2.4.6 Melting behaviour of semicrystalline polymers
We have now looked at both completely amorphous polymers and the
melting and crystallisation of lamellae. Even polymers in a very highly
crystalline state have 10% or more of amorphous material incorporated
between the lamellae and many semicrystalline polymers are 50-80%
amorphous.
The glassy amorphous material will become rubbery at the glass transition
temperature as the temperature is raised. The viscosity of a semicrystalline
polymer will be higher than with a fully amorphous one because the lamellae
act as relatively inert platelets restricting motion. Eventually the
temperature reaches the lamellar melting temperature and the polymer
segments that had been in the lamellae peel off the lamellae, becoming
indistinguishable from those that had been in the amorphous part. There
will be some drop in overall viscosity at the melting temperature (Tm) to that
of the amorphous material at that temperature as the melting lamellae cease
to restrict molecular motion in general.
1.2.4.7 Spherulites
Spherulites and other larger scale structures are made up of lamellae. The
spherulites are lamellar structures that have grown, splayed out and twisted
27
to create spherical forms. They appear as Maltese crosses under crossed
polarisation illumination. They are particularly important in polymers
crystallised from the melt. As early as 1888 Lehmann had made the
conclusion that they formed from long crystals that had forked as they grew
and spread out to fill up the space until they impinged on other growing
spherulites or until growth had stopped. The early observations of “twisted
crystals” in the 1920s and 1930s were for relatively small natural
macromolecules but by the mid to late 1940s they were being recognised in
polyethylene. Bryant identified that long polymer chains could partake in
multiple lamellae within a spherulite. That connection of the chains between
lamellae means that there is a coupled growth front for the spherulite as a
whole with the stacks of lamellae having amorphous material in between.
Other structures of lamellae that are encountered are axialites and hedrites
where crystals are attached to a common axis. Axialites can occur in
crystallisation from the melt but will be observed differently depending on
the direction of the axis relative to the observation direction. There are also
fibrillar structures encountered with oriented growth under stress such as
polymer fibre formation.
1.2.4.8 Poorly and partially crystallising polymer types
Aromatic groups on the main polymer backbone will have difficulty in
crystallising into lamellae because of steric hindrance. Polymers with long
branches will encounter difficulties in having the chains folding side by side
in lamellae because the side chains will get in the way sterically. Some
branched types will not crystallise in the main backbone but long side
branches may form lamellae. Copolymers often have one section that
crystallises and another part that does not.
1.2.4.9 Polymer-polymer miscibility
Often we want to utilise the strong points of two polymers to produce a
better material. The problem is that different types of polymers are usually
immiscible. There are a number of ways this can be overcome. One is to
synthesise block copolymers that have long chain segments of each polymer.
The synthesis in production quantities is often expensive. A number of
alternative approaches are possible, such as to use bulk quantities of each
polymer with a smaller amount of the relatively expensive copolymer to tie
phase separated domains of each type together as a compatibliser. Another
28
is to use maleic anhydride to reactively compatibilise the two. An alternative
method is to have two materials that can hydrogen bond together and use
this to compatibilise the materials as described by Huang et al. [42].
1.2.4.10 Polymer-diluent systems
The Flory-Huggins theory is an attempt to determine the ∆Gmix for polymer
solutions. Flory [43] and Huggins [44-46] independently put forward a
theory that has been modified by others in a variety of ways. The approach
is an extension of an earlier one by van Laar in which he treated two types (1
and 2) of equally sized molecules in an ideal solution as occupying the sites
of a three dimensional lattice. He then predicted the ∆Gmix as a function of
the universal gas constant, absolute temperature, numbers of moles of each
and the mole fractions of each material. That approach (which can be used
to derive Raoult’s law) was a failure for the case of polymer solutions. It was
extended by Flory and Huggins with the restraint that the segments of
polymer molecules within the solution are interconnected. It utilised an
interaction parameter Χ12 between the polymer and solvent molecules and
led to the ability to predict melting temperature depressions and phase
diagrams.
Flory [47 p.569] shows that
( )21121
10
11 vXvVH
RVTT u
u
mm
−∆
=− Eqn. (1-2 )
where mT is the equilibrium melting temperature of the mixture, 0mT the
equilibrium melting temperature of the pure polymer, R the Universal Gas
Constant, v1 the volume fraction of the diluent, ∆Hu is the heat of fusion of
the repeat unit, V1 and V2 the molar volumes of the diluent and unit
respectively and X1, the interaction parameter. The assumptions made in
the theory are that there is no volume change upon mixing, interactions of
the different types of segments cause the enthalpy of mixing after same type
interactions have been replaced, polymer repeat units and solvent molecules
are the same size and the number of combinations of polymer configuration
solely determines the entropy of mixing.
The Flory-Huggins lattice model, mean field theory above and its large
number of variants is suited to describing melting point depressions,
plasticisation and liquid-liquid (L-L) phase separations but not for
29
liquid-solid (L-S) phase transitions as taking place during crystallisation, as
discussed by Hu, Frenkel and Mathot [49]. No models to derive the
diluent-polymer interaction parameter Χ12 from linear relationships between
crystallisation temperature depressions and concentration have been located
in the literature. A number of the materials combinations studied in the
thesis do exhibit linear relationships between Tc and concentration for both
polyamide and for diluent. Calculations based on the above equation are
carried out in those chapters where melting depressions were found to occur
with a linear relation between melting point and concentration found.
Kelley and Bueche [50] use the additivity of free volume for the pure
materials in a miscible blend to determine the glass transition temperature
of a blend. Their calculations lead to good predictions of the Tg versus
composition curve and to the so-called Kelley-Bueche line delineating
vitrified and unvitrified blend regions. The intersection of the vitrification
and cloudpoint curves (due to phase separation) is the Berghmans Point.
1.2.5 Linear polyamides (Nylons) 1.2.5.1 History of polyamides
A linear polyamide was polymerised inadvertently at the end of last century
but was not recognised as being a polymer. A gelatinous mass had resulted
from experiments with amino carboxylic acids.
Prior to the 1920’s organic chemists failed to recognise the importance of
polymeric materials, concentrating their efforts on producing monomolecular
weight compounds. During the 1920’s, Staudinger recognised the existence
of polymeric material by relating solution viscosity to molecular weight.
Wallace H. Carothers was a brilliant organic chemist and in 1928 was
employed by DuPont to carry out research. He elected to continue in the
polymeric field opened up by Staudinger.
1929 was a period where great controversy still existed as to whether
polymers were long chain molecules, colloids, or aggregates of cyclic
compounds. At about this time Carothers [51] wrote a short review that for
the first time clearly identified the two main polymerisation reactions that we
now know as “chain growth” (addition) polymerisation and “step growth”
(condensation) polymerisation. He identified, in this review, that molecules
containing an amino group and a carboxylic acid group could condense to
form polymers such as polyamide-6. He also suggested that it may be
30
possible to condense diamine compounds with dicarboxylic acid compounds
to form polymers such as polyamide-6,6. In the early 1930s, when linear
polyamide-6 was being synthesised with caprolactam, he proceeded from
polycondensation with ε-aminocaproic acid to the synthesis using
hexamethyl diamine and adipic acid.
By 1939, the US approach had developed to the extent that there were
plants set up to commercially produce polyamide-6, which by then had
acquired the commercial name Nylon. This commercial activity was soon
subsumed by the war efforts. Germany pursued the investigation of optimal
polyamide types using the amino acid condensation and did not produce
polyamides commercially until after the war.
Nylons were one of the early polymers developed commercially. Nowadays,
they are manufactured industrially for a broad range of applications such as
clothing, stockings, carpets, fishing lines, tyre reinforcers, seat belts, and in
the components of a wide range of appliances and equipment. The fibre
component alone of linear polyamide worldwide production is in the order of
4 million tonnes per annum. This comprises nearly a quarter of total
synthetic fibre production, as noted by Elias [52].
Later developments lead to polyamides made with aromatic groups in the
main chain (called Aramids), branched polyamides and copolymers
incorporating polyamides in various forms. These later types are not covered
in this research work and they represent a much smaller volume of
commercial production.
1.2.5.2 Strengths
Polyamides are tough, impact resistant, flexible, abrasion resistant, heat
stable materials [53, 54] whose characteristic physical properties are mainly
determined as a result of hydrogen bonding. There are a range of
polyamides with varying properties dependant upon molecular structure of
the monomer repeat units.
Some of the newer polyamides such as polyamide-4,6 [55] have very high
melting temperatures, and mechanical stability that allow them to be used in
automotive applications near the engine. This particular polyamide has the
fast crystallisation that makes it attractive for injection moulders.
31
1.2.5.3 Weaknesses
Humidity plasticises and weakens polyamides. Polyamides also become
brittle when dry. Both these characteristics result from hydrogen bonding.
1.2.5.4 Chemical structure and polyamide types
Linear polyamides have a main chain with repeated amide units
incorporating -CONH- sections as shown in Figure 1-12. The amide unit is
always trans across the polymer backbone although it can sometimes be
partly twisted.
O II
– C – C – N – C – C - I
H Figure 1-12 CONH amide units found in polyamides showing the trans configuration of the bonds.
There are two basic types of linear polyamides, the polyamide-n type and the
polyamide-m,n type where the m and n are numbers representing the
number of carbon atoms in (parts of) the polymer repeat units.
Polyamide-n types, with n carbon atoms per repeat unit, can be formed by
condensation from amino acids such as in Carothers’ earlier work. Only one
material is used as the monomeric substance. An example is the ring
opening of caprolactam with its 6 carbon atoms and one nitrogen atom in a
ring. The opened ring is polymerised end to end into long chains forming
polyamide-6. Water is a by-product of the high temperature polymerisation
reaction and is pumped away to drive the reaction forward.
The polyamide-m,n types are obtained by the polycondensation of a diamine
and a dicarboxylic acid (or diacid). The number of carbon atoms in the main
chain due to the diamine gives the first number, m, and the number of
carbon atoms in the diacid gives the second number, n. For example,
hexamethyl diamine and adipic acid are used to synthesise polyamide-6,6.
Sometimes the number is placed before the word polyamide and sometimes
PA or Nylon is used. In some situations the name of the amino acid is used.
It is common to see PA-6, PA6, Nylon-6, Nylon6, 6-Nylon, Polyamide 6 and
poly(ε-caprolactam) for polyamide-6. There is an even greater variation of
naming for the m,n (or mn) types. Sometimes the comma is left out with
Nylon 612 meaning polyamide-6,12. The maximum length of polyamide-n
32
types is in the twenties and the maximum length of a polyamide-m,n is
similar so there is usually little confusion in omitting the comma.
When the numbers n or m+n are small then the repeat distance is shorter.
These polyamides are often referred to as “short” or “lower” polyamides as
distinct from “higher” polyamides. This does not refer to the number of
repeat units in the total polymer chain length.
It should be pointed out that polyamide-6 and polyamide-6,6 are quite
different materials even though the density of amide bonds in a polymer
chain is the same. The melting temperature of polyamide-6 at 225 0C is
some 30 0C less than for polyamide-6,6. The reasons for this will become
evident later.
The simplified structure of polyamide-6 and polyamide-6,6 are shown below in Figure 1-13 with repeat units in bold font. O O II II
- C - C - C - C - C - C - N - C - C - C - C - C - C - N - I I H H
polyamide-6 O O II II
- N - C - C - C - C - C - C - N - C - C - C - C - C - C – I I H H
polyamide-6,6
Figure 1-13 Repeat units of the n type polyamide-6 with all amide groups in the same direction and m,n type polyamide-6,6 from diamine combined with diacid and having the amide groups in alternating directions.
Note that the amide group is asymmetric so that the polyamide-6 repeat unit
fits head to tail along the molecule. The molecule as a whole is
unidirectional. On the other hand, the polyamide-6,6 can be seen to have
points of symmetry at the mid points of the amide and of the diacid groups.
This is an important point and will be taken up later. The “directional”
polyamide-n types will have antiparallel sections of molecules next to each
other as the molecule loops back in a hairpin. This happens as the
backward and forward laying of the molecule into place occurs on the lateral
33
faces of the lamellae. Sections of different molecules layered against them at
later stages can be parallel or antiparallel in direction.
It can also be seen that the polyamide-6 has a repeat length of 7 atoms in
the backbone whereas the polyamide-6,6 has a repeat length of 14 atoms.
Polyamide-6 and -6,6 are used for textiles because of their high tensile
strength. Polyamide-6,10 and polyamide-11 have longer distance between
amide groups are used for sutures and sporting goods requiring flexibility.
1.2.5.5 Biological-polyamide parallels
The biological fields touched on below are examples of, perhaps, the most
exciting potential areas to which this research could contribute because the
boundaries between biology and synthetic chemistry are breaking down and
both disciplines are learning from each other. This can be seen in a recent
review with over 160 references by Cunliffe, Pennadam and Alexander [56].
Linear polyamides are one of the most important natural polymers and are
known by biochemists and biologists as proteins or polypeptides. The
peptide linkage referred to by biologists is identical to the amide linkage that
occurs in synthetic linear polyamides. The molecular structure of
polyamide-2 forms a very simple model [57, 58] for a protein. Some of the
parallels between polyamides and proteins can be pointed out. A better
comprehension of polyamide crystallinity in different environments could
potentially lead to improved understanding of the way in which proteins fold,
recognised nowadays as a very important area of biology. Proteins can form
“molten globules” before crystallising out fully [32, 58] and this concept may,
in turn, be relevant to the way in which polyamides crystallise from the melt
or solution, particularly in the light of the recent work of Olmsted et al. [30]
on the formation of crystallites in molten polymers.
1.2.5.6 Polyamide Hydrogen Bonding
Polyamide crystallisation is more complicated than with many polymers
because hydrogen bonding constrains the crystallographic possibilities
further than just the steric considerations [59].
Hydrogen bonding, in general, was discussed earlier. It is now appropriate
to look at hydrogen bonding specifically in polyamides. The nitrogen atoms
in the amide sections are highly electronegative, withdrawing some of the
charge from the attached hydrogen. Normally the oxygen from the carbonyl
34
bond in another amide group elsewhere in the polymer chain or from
another molecule will be attracted to the hydrogen to form the N-H.…O
hydrogen bond, as portrayed in Figure 1-14.
O II
– C – C – N – C – I H . . .
O II – C – C – N – C – I H
Figure 1-14 Amide to amide hydrogen bonding found in polyamides showing the bridging from the electronegative oxygen of one amide group to the electron deficient hydrogen attached to the electronegative nitrogen atom of another amide group in the same polymer chain or another molecule
In general, there can be weak and strong hydrogen bonds. Those involved in
polyamides are considered moderate to strong.
These hydrogen bonds in polyamides are pervasive, being substantially
consummated in the amorphous state and are even present at a significant
level in the melt [60-62]. This makes the polyamides much more viscous in
the 50 0C range above their melting temperature than many other polymers.
They are the driving force that locks the crystallising lamella into one or
another crystalline form. They are also the reason for the very high melting
temperature of linear polyamides because they provide stability to the
lamellar structures.
Other molecules can be incorporated into the amorphous polyamide
structure, such as water, which plasticises and weakens polyamides by
displacing the hydrogen bonds.
1.2.5.7 Polyamide Crystallinity
Linear polyamide crystallinity is strongly affected by the exact type of linear
polyamide because of the limited combinations of the way hydrogen bonds
can be consummated within the constraints of the number of molecules
between amide groups. The orientation of the non-symmetric amide groups
in the chains also plays a strong role such as in the difference of 30 0C in
melting temperatures of polyamide-6 and polyamide-6,6 referred to above.
There are also steric limitations between the sections of molecular chains
35
lying next to each other and between different molecules in a lamella. These
differences between polyamides can be exploited to gain a better
understanding of polyamide crystallinity and the part hydrogen bonding
plays in their properties.
1.2.5.8 Polyamide Crystalline Structures
This and most of the following few sections are included mainly to provide
background understanding of the crystallographic forms polyamides can
take in differing situations and on Brill transitions rather than raise
expectations of the discussion of those in the experimental results.
We will first describe the five major crystallographic forms encountered with
polyamides as they crystallise from solution or the melt.
There are:
a) α, where the hydrogen bonds are in planes or “sheets” parallel to the edge
faces of lamellae (often intra-molecular bonds) and layers are built up
layer (sheet) upon layer [63]. With α there is an offset from the bonds of
one layer to another resulting in the basal planes of the lamellae being
inclined to the chain direction. Wide Angle X-ray Diffraction (WAXD)
gives two peaks at approximately 0.44 and 0.38 nm respectively at room
temperature. This is a stable crystalline form.
b) β, identical to α except that the chains with their offsets are stacked one
up and one down resulting in the (rougher at a molecular level) lamellar
basal plane being more or less perpendicular to the chain direction [63].
This is a stable crystalline form.
c) γ or pseudohexagonal and has inter-molecular hydrogen bonds between
amide groups in separate layers (sheets). The energetics result in a slight
offset between chains of different layers [63]. The chain spacing is nearly
hexagonal with a spacing of approximately 0.41 nm. With equal intra-
and inter-sheet distances between chains it is possible now for the
hydrogen bonds to be inter-sheet rather than intra-sheet.
d) Hydrogen bonds with more than one direction. Here, the amide groups
are twisted to give optimal energetics with one hydrogen bond to an
amide group in a chain in the same sheet and the next hydrogen bond
above or below being to the next sheet. Recently, polyamide-6,9 was
36
found by Franco et al. [64] to belong to this overall group of polyamides.
The groups that initiated this understanding are Subirana, Puiggali,
Navarro and colleagues with collaboration from Atkins, Hill, Cooper and
Jones [65-71].
e) Metastable pseudohexagonal forms [72] (broader single peak with X-rays)
and other forms with imperfect α structures.
There are also some other minor crystalline forms various authors have
referred to, including the Atkins, Hill, Hong, Keller and Organ [73] work
showing polyamide-4,6 has an α-like structure but with the chain direction
completely perpendicular to the basal plane and amide groups in the chain
fold. This is unlike the usual inclination to the basal plane, as found with
polyamide-6 and polyamide-6,12.
1.2.5.9 Effect of polyamide Type and Segment Length on Crystal Form
The exact way that a crystallising polyamide molecule folds backwards and
forwards to match up hydrogen bond acceptors and donors is very important
[48 Section 1.3]. We know from earlier work by Roberts and Jenekhe [74]
that virtually 100% of hydrogen bonds are consummated in the crystal, even
if it requires bending of bonds or the backbone of the chain to link through
from N-H to O. Both the parallel and antiparallel chain alignments can
connect hydrogen bonds easily within the molecule if the polyamide is an
“odd” numbered polyamide-n such as polyamide-7. Odd Nylon n types tend
to be more stable in the α- or β-form.
The stable form for “even” polyamide-n types, such as polyamide-6 is
generally the α− or β-form with hydrogen bonds matching up parallel to each
other and perpendicular to the overall polymer backbone. The angle in the
lamellar basal plane between the intra-molecular hydrogen bonds and the
corresponding chains of the next layer is at 67.50 to satisfy the steric and
energy constraints. Distances between chains within the sheets are greater
than between the van der Waals bonded sheets. The coefficient of thermal
expansion is less in the plane of the molecules than the inter-planar
direction. The hydrogen bonding constrains the molecular chains in a sheet
much more than between molecular sheets, as these are only held together
by the weaker van der Waals forces. The longer even polyamides can be more
stable in the γ form.
37
Even polyamide-n types in the α- or β-form have higher melting
temperatures than similar repeat length odd polyamide-n types by nearly
20 0C. The γ-form is regarded as being thermodynamically more unstable,
which correlates with the lower Tm.
The situation is further complicated with polyamide-m,n types because there
can be odd with odd, even with even, odd with even and even with odd
numbers of carbon atoms in the diamine and diacid sections respectively.
Even the last two are different in the way the parts of a molecule or parts of
different molecules can link together to consummate the hydrogen bonds.
The requirements for crystallinity are that this all happens in a consistent
way over (at least) regions of lamellae. In some cases the crystal repeat
distances are two monomer repeat lengths.
Odd-odd, odd-even and even-odd polyamide m,n types are usually more
stable in the γ-form. Here the hydrogen bonds are made between amide
groups in adjacent molecular sheets. The γ configuration has the two
hydrogen bonds in a molecular repeat unit at an angle to each other, and
neither is exactly perpendicular to the zigzagging backbone. This is because
the bonds do not exactly match up opposite to each other. The energy of the
total configuration must be minimised. It leads to hydrogen bonds holding
the sections of molecules further apart than would be the case for the α- or
β-form, and even further apart than for polyethylene. It also leads to a
slightly shorter repeat length. The total outcome is a crystal with slightly
lower density. The angle in the basal plane between the intramolecular
plane and the chains of the next layer is close to 600 and this leads to a near
hexagonal crystal structure, usually referred to as pseudohexagonal. The
coefficient of thermal expansion is the same in both directions of the basal
plane.
Even-odd polyamide-6,7 would seem, at first sight, to be similar to the
odd-even polyamide 7,6 but the bonds have to be twisted at different angles
to make the O.…H-N connections. The result is slightly different material
properties between the two polyamide types.
There are a number of diverse characteristics that can be found in the
different polyamide types. Even-even polyamide m,n types are generally
more stable in the α- or β-form [75]. “Shorter” Nylons have a higher
38
hydrogen bond density and have higher melting temperatures and densities
than the same types with longer overall repeat lengths. Polyamide-6,6 has a
30 0C higher melting temperature than Nylon-6, although both have the
same overall hydrogen bond density. Crystalline forms are different because
of the different orientation of amide groups within the chains [76, 77].
Different Nylon types have differing levels of moisture uptake due to their
various hydrogen bonding configurations [78 p. 324].
1.2.5.10 Multiple crystalline forms are possible - Polymorphism
There is usually more than one form possible for a particular polyamide type
but it often depends upon the thermal history as to which one is present in a
sample. The α- or β-form is more stable for longer polyamide n types and
the γ-form for shorter polyamide n types. Polyamide-6 appears to be equally
likely to have both forms, and these can coexist in a lamella. Polyamide-4,6
can exist in both α- and β-forms at the same time [79].
The form that exists in a polyamide depends on steric restrictions and the
most energetically favourable situation at a particular time. Often a
metastable crystalline configuration will form first, and later the crystalline
structure will change to another arrangement of hydrogen bonds, bond
angles and crystal cell distances. It can become energetically more
favourable to change to a different configuration as the thermal history of a
crystal develops.
Conversion between the two forms can be made to take place by temperature
changes [80] and also by solvents or materials that make polyamide swell
[81].
Sometimes a number of crystal forms will be present in the one sample [82]
and for polyamide-12 [83], the crystal structure can be varied by pressure
and cooling rates.
1.2.5.11 Effect of pressure on crystallinity, melting temperature and crystal form
Pressure often affects polymers by increasing crystallinity [84],
melting/crystallisation temperature and can change the crystallographic
structure. In particular, pressure affects the way in which polyamides
crystallise such as with the Ramesh work on polyamide-12 [83] and
supported by the English abstracts of the Chinese language work by Lu
Huang, Fan, Cai and Xie on polyamide-6 [85, 86]. Gogolewski and Pennings
39
show in their work on polyamide-6 [87, 88] that crystallisation under
pressure increases the crystallinity, although a greater increase can be
gained afterwards by annealing under pressure.
1.2.5.12 Metastability
Some materials go to metastable forms above or at the crystallisation
temperature and then change to more stable forms as the temperature is
lowered. Fast cooling can often trap crystal structures in a metastable form
because the molecules quickly lose the energy to surmount an activation
energy barrier. “Cold crystallisation” can often only take place when
previously quickly cooled material is raised in temperature to near melting.
A kinetic event takes place rather than a thermodynamic one with the
melting and recrystallisation into a more stable form before melting of the
stable form into liquid melt can take place.
1.2.5.13 Brill Temperature
The Brill transition occurs where a low temperature α form is heated so far
that the inter-sheet spacing increases until it is the same as the intra-sheet
spacing. Some contraction of the intra-sheet spacing is required with
temperature increase for the energy minimisation of the structure.
Eventually both d-spacings become 0.41 nm in a hexagonal structure. At
this stage, the hydrogen bonds can easily change from intra-sheet to
inter-sheet. The structure then becomes the γ form described above. The
changes in d-spacings between crystalline planes can be followed with
WAXD as temperature increases. The Brill temperature (TB) is the point
where there is no difference in spacings. The Brill transition has been most
extensively studied in polyamide-6,6 [64, 89-92] but does also occur in other
even-even polyamides [79, 93-98]. The Brill transition is reversible and on
cooling, the stable hexagonal γ form material reverts to α form.
Some polyamides do not quite reach the Brill transition before they melt.
The stable form of the crystal will remain α- or β-form in these cases.
Kohan states [99 p. 143] that Brill transitions are usually not seen with DSC
scans for melt crystallised samples, so they are not expected to be seen with
DSC in the work carried out here.
40
This discussion has been included to alert to some of the complexities
involved. No further discussion of Brill temperatures is given in the text
because of the use of DSC results and absence of WAXD results.
1.3 Relevant papers in the area to be covered in the research There has been much done in the way of research on amorphous-amorphous
and crystallisable-amorphous polymer systems (including polyamides) and
methods to overcome miscibility problems. Much of that has been driven by
the desire to improve the physical properties of polymers in a cost-effective
manner. A few have done work on semicrystalline-semicrystalline blends,
sometimes enhancing miscibility by hydrogen bond interactions [100]
(although Qiu et al. only touch on those interactions) and a few have
researched semicrystalline-(crystalline) small molecule blends.
The area covered by the research is concerned with the melting and
crystallisation of aliphatic polyamides with certain, potentially hydrogen
bond disrupting, small molecules. With the exception of water, this area
does not appear to have been covered by other researchers but there have
been papers published in adjoining areas and these will be reviewed in this
section.
1.3.1 Small molecule-small molecule Sucrose is usually crystallised from anhydrous melts or highly concentrated
solutions in a controlled manner to generate the specific textures or
appearance required for the final product such as fudge, hard candies. It is
shown in a paper by Bhandari and Hartel [101] by DSC and XRD results
that it is possible to reduce the crystallinity from molten anhydrous sucrose
to about a third by the addition of up to total weight 20% fructose, glucose
or a mixture of the two in a co-crystallisation process.
1.3.2 Polymers with small molecules Kristiansen et al. have studied sorbitol based nucleating agents(DMDBS) for
removing haze from isotactic poly(propylene) (iPP) in their recent paper
[102]. They also studied a very much wider range of concentrations than the
optimal clarifying concentration near 0.8% so that they could understand
some of the mechanisms. They refer to a regime III near the melting
temperature of DMDBS (higher than the iPP) where phase separation takes
place (as determined with optical microscopy). At lower temperatures, there
41
is a partially crystallised fibrillar structure that solidifies below the eutectic
temperature.
Simek et al. [103] have studied the melting temperature depression of
isotactic poly(propylene) (iPP) by alkanes. They have used the Flory Huggins
relationship to explore the size of the effect.
Kim and Kim [104] looked at liquid-liquid phase separation occurring with
vinyl acetate and paraffin wax blends with poly(ethylene-ran-vinyl acetate)
using DSC, cloud point determinations and wide angle X-ray diffraction.
Their 1 0C/min and 10 0C/min cooling results are closest to the 2 0C/min
and 25 0C/min cooling rates used in this work and show only slight
differences in the DSC thermograms for reheating after nonisothermal
crystallisation.
1.3.3 Blend interactions and hydrogen bonding There are some similarities in a recent paper by Rocco et al. [105] to the
original concept for hydrogen bond disruption by small molecules. In their
case they were interested in suppressing crystallisation of poly(ethylene
oxide) (PEO) by hydrogen bonding poly(bisphenol A-co-epichlorohydrin)
(PBE) to enhance properties of PEO being used as polyelectrolytes in
batteries. The blend interactions were observed with a shift for O-H from
3495 to 3348 cm-1 in going from the “free” (non-hydrogen bonded) state to
the “bound” hydrogen bonded state. This change of 50 cm-1 seen in peak
position (without Gaussian deconvolution) is indicative of what could be
expected with polyamides and hydrogen bond disrupting diluents if there
were any hydrogen bond interactions.
Dormidontova and ten Brinke [106] tackle the influences of hydrogen
bonding on micro- and macro-phase separation from a theoretical
perspective for comb copolymers with hydrogen bond interacting
end-functionalised oligomers.
Kobori et al. [107] looked at interfacial interactions of immiscible polymer
blends (linear-low density polyethylene/poly(methyl methacrylate) with
polyethylene) where hydrogen bonding did and did not play a role. The two
combinations respectively linear-low density polyethylene/poly(4-vinyl
phenol) containing polyethylene-block-poly(methyl methacrylate)
(LLDPE/PVPh with PE-b-PMMA) and the non-associating blend
42
LLDPE/PMMA with PE-b-PMMA were studied. FTIR measurements showed
differences with an extra peak for hydrogen bonded carbonyl groups 30 cm-1
from the normal peak for unbonded carbonyl groups at 1730 cm-1. These
were associated with differences in the phase boundaries demonstrating
lower interfacial tension between the phases.
1.3.4 Polyamides and Polymers Much of the work reported in this area is by researchers trying to overcome
the abysmal performance of polyamide/other polymer blends using a variety
of compatibilisers. Often comments are made about the uncompatibilised
blends that give an idea of the normal situation.
Moon, Ryoo and Park [108] discuss their work on using maleic anhydride
grafted polypropylene as a compatibiliser to improve
polyamide/polypropylene blends that are a semicrystalline/semicrystalline
combination.
Jafari et al. [109] studied the crystallisation of polyamide-6/polypropylene
blends using hot stage microscopy to look at the formation of polyamide
spherulites and how the polypropylene crystallised at a later stage. It will be
raised in a later chapter later that this paper may be relevant to the way
polyamides crystallise in certain circumstances.
Murthy et al. [110] took the interesting approach of blending a
non-crystallisable aromatic polyamide with (normally crystallisable)
polyamide-6 and used simultaneous small and wide-angle X-ray studies to
probe the crystallinity of the polyamide-6 in the blends. They found that the
polyamide-6 crystallinity was depressed by the presence of this other
polyamide.
Kim, Cho and Yoon [5] have recently studied the effects of compatibilisers on
blends between polyamide-6 and poly(vinylidenefluoride) (PVDF) to improve
the poor mechanical performance of these semicrystalline/semicrystalline
blends. The uncompatibilised blends had strong phase separation. The two
areas the uncompatibilised blends were noted for were poorer compatibility
in the amorphous regions and faster crystallisation.
PVDF is crystallised isothermally with polyamide-11 by Li and Kaito [111]
and studied as uniaxially stretched films with SAXS and WAXD with or
without annealing. There are limited DSC results with a peak for the
43
polyamide crystallising in the blend at a temperature higher than normal for
polyamide. It is possible that this experimental result is consistent in
mechanism with a couple of similar examples of this in this work, despite
theirs being a polymer-polymer system.
1.3.5 Polyamides and small molecules Cha et al. [8] have studied a system of polyamide-12 with poly(ethylene
glycol) (PEG) of differing molecular weights in relation to the formation of
membranes by thermally induced phase separation. This is chemically the
closest of the available literature to the systems studied here but they have
tackled it from a different perspective with a focus on the effects of molecular
weight of the diluent and on diluent-rich domain size. Their work used light
transmission changes to detect phase separation in dynamically cooled
(10 0C/min) melt blends. Samples 200 µm thick between coverslips could be
cooled quickly into the unstable region where droplets of polymer-poor
material formed and solidified once the phase separation temperatures had
been determined. Sample thickness at 200 µm is less than half the
estimated thickness of the samples investigated in this thesis but that is not
expected to induce significant differences due to dimensional constraints.
Some samples were initially produced by first solvent casting (with heated
vacuum drying) before forming the melted film. The authors claim that no
differences were detected due to this procedure. Videomicroscopy was also
used for phase separation temperatures. Their study gives experimental
phase diagrams with cloud point curves delineating the liquid-liquid phase
separation boundary and melting & crystallisation points for the Nylon at
different polyamide concentrations. They do not describe how these latter
data points were determined and whether they are the melting and
crystallisation peak temperatures or onset temperatures. However part of
the group describe in a later article how they use optical methods to
measure melting and crystallisation temperatures [10]. Whether those are
the methods used in the 1995 paper is not clear but that paper does not
describe the use of equipment other than hot stage optical microscopy
observations, videomicroscopy and SEM. The early part of the paper is
devoted to the development of phase diagrams giving the
temperature-composition conditions where two-phase behaviour exists and
the results of that are used for setting up experiments where mixtures are
44
quenched to 170 0C, diluent rich domains develop and later the samples are
cooled to ambient temperatures. The focus here is on the size of PEG-rich
domains that can be used to form membrane pores.
Their study covered PEG with molecular weights of 200, 400, 600, 1000,
1540 and 3400 Daltons. The results for the PEG having a molecular weight
of 200 Dalton are the closest to the carbazole and phenothiazine used in this
study (167 and 199 Daltons respectively) and PEG has a quite different
molecular form to the poly-aromatic rings of the carbazole and
phenothiazine. The carbazole and phenothiazine used here have quite
different molecular shapes to the PEG and only have molecular weights near
200. The molecular weight and form factors will affect the mobility of the
diluent molecules in the amorphous and molten polyamide in different ways
and the chemical potentials of the diluents with respect to that of the
polyamides will differ. Polyamide-12 is a polyamide with a lower density of
amide groups than the polyamide-6,12. It has a lower melting temperature
than the polyamides studied here and would be expected to have a lower
crystallinity also, approximating a polyolefin much more than them.
The major findings of the paper were that UCST behaviour was seen,
solid-liquid as well as liquid-liquid phase separation were seen, that the two
phase region was larger with increasing diluent molecular weight. They also
showed that both diluent molecular weight and content in the mixture
affected the interaction energies derived with Flory-Huggins theory. Factors
they found that are perhaps of lesser interest in the context of this thesis are
that the domain size was larger for greater PEG molecular weight but this
was not so strong an effect at low PEG content of the mixture.
This thesis later discusses the relative crystallisation temperatures of
polyamide and carbazole or phenothiazine diluent. It can be noted at this
point that PEG200 has a higher crystallisation temperature than
polyamide-12 in the study by Cha et al. and that this corresponds to the
case with polyamide-6, polyamide-6,9 or polyamide-6,12 combined with
carbazole.
45
1.4 The focus of the research project Aliphatic polyamides, or “Nylons”, are an important class of engineering
polymers. They are characterised by relatively high melting temperatures,
high impact strength and toughness.
An overall study of the literature in this general field has not uncovered
much work generally in the area of polymers melt blended with small organic
molecules and only one relevant paper on polyamides with small organic
molecules with that one looking at quite different aspects [8]. The literature
has shown that some others have achieved hydrogen bond complexing
between poly(ethyleneoxide) with poly(bisphenol A-co-epichlorohydrin)
whereas that was found not to occur with the materials chosen.
The research problem is to understand the processes involved in forming
high temperature solutions by melting linear polyamides with carbazole or
phenothiazine (as examples of small molecules) and in their crystallisation.
It is also to understand the resulting morphologies arising from
crystallisation and the effect of polyamide type.
The research had originally been planned to investigate the role of hydrogen
bond formation on crystallinity in linear polyamides. The concept was partly
based on the work of Damman, Point and coworkers [21, 112-114] in
creating molecular complexes between poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) and
p-nitrophenol or resorcinol that are hydrogen bond complexed with them.
There was also some (as yet unpublished) work done by others within our
group at the University of South Australia on poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) and
resorcinol.
The project had also been undertaken to study the effect of hydrogen bond
complexing on the physical properties that make Nylons desirable to use in
many applications. The potential benefits of the project were to aid in
widening the manufacturing/processing window for Nylons, to provide
options for adding dyes to Nylons in solution or the melt and the potential to
assist in developing new ways to deliver drugs within the body by
encapsulating them in polyamide excipients. A more fundamental reason for
doing this research was to help the understanding of hydrogen bonding in
polyamides in general. There was also the possibility of using a synthetic,
46
model compound to better understand protein folding because of the
similarities between amides and the peptides found in proteins.
The aim was to insert organic materials in the melt that would disrupt the
polyamide-polyamide hydrogen bonding so that the strong hydrogen bonds
would be destroyed and the material properties altered. This approach using
organic hydrogen bond disruptors is quite different from the earlier inorganic
approaches by others. Those had concentrated on iodination [115-119] or
the use of metallic ions such as Ca++ [120] for the study of changes in
crystalline structure. This alternative approach was taken because of the
obvious close parallels with many biological systems. The work was done in
the melt rather than room temperature solutions to avoid the three-way
competition for hydrogen bonds that would arise from dissolving the
polyamides in a solvent [42]. Polyamides require very strong solvents such
as formic acid, concentrated sulphuric acid, m-cresol or special solvents
such as 1,1,1,3,3,3hexafluoroisopropanol [121] that have to destroy the
polyamide-polyamide hydrogen bonds in order to dissolve the solid polymer
in the first place. The intention was to use DSC as part of the material
property analysis.
It will later be clear from FTIR results that the materials chosen did not
result in hydrogen bond interactions with the polyamides along the lines
expected [42, 112, 113].
1.4.1 Materials chosen 1.4.1.1 Polyamides
Four, quite different, representative polyamides were chosen for the study so
that the conclusions could be as general as possible. It has been shown
above that the melting temperatures and crystallography of polyamides are
influenced strongly by the type of polyamide. The relevant parameters
included whether they were polyamide-m,n or polyamide-n types, whether
polyamide-m,n is even-even or odd-even and the density of amide groups in
the backbone is high or low.
One of the polyamide materials chosen was polyamide-4,6 [122, 123] which
is an even-even polyamide with a high amide group density. It has much
higher crystallinity and melting temperature than most other polyamides
[55] due to the above factors. It provides one end of the scale of even-even
polyamides studied. Polyamide-6,12 is towards the extreme of even-even
47
polyamides having low amide density and still readily available. The very
common polyamide-6,6 was not chosen because there were no samples
available that were not known to have fire retardants and other additives
and because the two more extreme members of even-even polyamides were
being studied, allowing estimates for the intermediate polyamide-6,6.
Polyamide-6 was available in grades not known to have additives.
Polyamide-6 and polyamide-6,6 are the most common of commercial
polyamides so polyamide-6 is representative of both a mid amide density
polyamide and a polyamide-n type.
Polyamide-6,9 was also available in a grade not known to have additives and
is representative of an even-odd polyamide-m,n. Its melting temperature is
lower than polyamide-6,12, with even lower amide density, due to the
even-odd configuration having unfavourable hydrogen bond linkages. It is
also a member of the group of polyamides now known to have hydrogen
bonds in multiple directions [64].
These four polyamides have melting temperatures between 209 and 290 0C
and provide a compact group with a suitable range in repeat unit types,
stable hydrogen bond structures and melting temperatures. This should
allow us to draw some general conclusions about the interactions and phase
behaviour of polyamides melted with the two chosen materials.
1.4.1.2 Small molecules
Work started originally with 2-methyl resorcinal and p-dihydroxybenzene
(hydroquinone) as these had been hydrogen bond complexed with PEG in
Paternostre, Damman and Dosiere’s work [124, 125]. Evaporation was an
immediate problem because the polyamides melt at such high temperatures,
so other potential materials such as benzophenone with higher boiling
temperatures were also tested.
There were several determining factors in the choice of small hydrogen bond
disrupting molecules to be used in the originally planned melt complexing
project. A list of criteria was then drawn up.
Polyamides start to degrade (scission of the polymer chain at the amide
groups above approximately 325 0C as seen in the TGA thermogram later
(Figure 1-16 in Section.1.5.1). There is usually further polymerisation of
polyamides at temperatures near the melt and above [48]. Extended periods
48
at elevated temperatures above 300 0C would result in a marked increase in
polydispersity from scission and further polymerisation that would detract
from the validity of the work because of the uncontrolled molecular weight
distribution. The small molecule melting temperature upper limit became
300 0C.
a) Trials need to run substantially above the melting temperature of both
the Nylon and the potential disruptor so that self-seeding nuclei from
either material would not remain in the melt to cause premature
crystallisation. In particular, the polyamide should have over five
minutes fully in the melt to remove the previous crystalline state.
b) The potential disruptor should not evaporate or decompose at the
temperature of the trials, ie. more than 300 0C in the case of experiments
with polyamide-4,6. It was preferable to have the same material(s) for all
polyamides so that valid comparisons could be made.
c) The affinity of a hydrogen bond disruptor for the Nylon hydrogen bonds
should preferably be greater than the strength of polyamide-polyamide
hydrogen bonds.
d) There should only be one potential hydrogen bonding site on the molecule
so that bridging between several polyamide chains (or within a chain)
would be avoided.
These criteria are quite difficult to meet. For example the common Nylon
plasticisers N-ethyl o- or p-toluenesulfonamide boil at 196 0C and have
multiple potential hydrogen bonding sites per molecule. Another,
N-butylbenzenesulfonamide, boils at 314 0C
Nearly a dozen potential compounds were found that seemed to be suitable
and each one had a single N-H or C=O bond available for hydrogen bonding.
Some of those were not commercially available and could also not be
obtained via contacts in various laboratories. A handful of the rest
remained. Many of those were evaluated with Simultaneous DTA-TGA (SDT)
to eliminate poor performers on the critical evaporation criterion.
That left only two, carbazole and phenothiazine, that were reasonably
suitable. The melting temperature of carbazole is 246 0C and its boiling
temperature is 355 0C whilst the melting temperature of phenothiazine is
49
186 0C and its boiling temperature is 371 0C [126] . It was found that the
boiling temperature is not as critical as the vapour pressure at the working
temperatures near 310 0C. It will be seen in later chapters that carbazole
with the lower boiling temperature gave less trouble in the trials than the
higher boiling phenothiazine.
Problems were still encountered for carbazole and phenothiazine with
evaporation, even for polyamide-6,9, with its low melting temperature, and
even with high heating and cooling rates to minimise evaporation.
The structures of the two materials are shown below in Figure 1-15.
NH H
N
S Figure 1-15 The structures of Carbazole and Phenothiazine.
These are both relatively flat molecules although the phenothiazine has a
slight curvature from top to bottom as computed for us by Dr. Adam
McCluskey at Newcastle University in New South Wales, Australia. Both
have pi electron clouds above and below the benzene rings.
1.4.2 Sample blending and notation used for blends Small samples could be made up from powders in Differential Scanning
Calorimeter (DSC) pans to understand the initial melting (plus crystallisation
and later remelting) in the DSC. Larger blend samples were mandatory to
study properties using a variety of the techniques described below in Section
1.6 and these could be made in ampoules.
A consistent notation is used within the thesis for melt blend samples.
Polyamides are often described in the literature in various forms. For
example, polyamide-4,6 is seen in articles as Polyamide-4,6 polyamide-46
Polyamide4,6 polyamide46 PA-4,6 PA-46 PA46 Nylon-4,6 Nylon-46
Nylon4,6 Nylon46 4,6-Nylon and some other variants. The versions that
will be used here for melt blending are PA46, PA6, PA69, and PA612 for
polyamide-4,6, polyamide-6, polyamide-6,9 and polyamide-6,12 respectively
when combined with Car for carbazole, or PTh for phenothiazine (This
should perhaps have been PhTh but the aim was to keep it to three letters
signifying which diluent was involved in the blend.). Polyamide-4,6 blended
50
with carbazole is generally noted as PA46Car. Specific samples with known
percentages of polyamide are preceded by the weight percentage of
polyamide eg 39PA69PTh for a sample of 39% polyamide-6,9 in combination
with phenothiazine. The value of 39% would be calculated from the few
milligrams of each material used when blending in pans in the DSC or from
the TGA results where a sample is taken from the bulk material made in
larger quantities in an ampoule. The samples for TGA are taken from next to
the DSC samples. This notation provides an easily recognisable and
compact descriptor for each sample.
1.5 Experimental Techniques Used This section includes results that will be used to illustrate certain recurring
features that will be discussed throughout the thesis. The major focus of the
work rests on the results of Differential Scanning Calorimetry and Fourier
transform infrared spectroscopy (in Mid and Near infrared ranges) with the
support of Thermogravimetric Analysis for determining polyamide
concentration in ampoule samples.
1.5.1 Thermogravimetric Analysis Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA) is used in this project to determine the
weight percentage of polyamide in a bulk sample where the composition may
vary markedly from the average for the whole sample. It is a technique
where a sample of material is heated in a gas stream with a furnace and the
weight is monitored accurately with an extremely sensitive balance.
Figure 1-16 Evaporation of carbazole followed by degradation of polyamide-4,6 in TGA.
51
This technique can be used because carbazole (or phenothiazine) in a blend
sample will evaporate in an inert gas stream (nitrogen) before the polyamide
begins to degrade. Evaporation usually takes place (at 10 0C/min ramping
rate) in the range 175-275 0C but the polyamide does not begin to degrade at
that ramp rate until well into the molten state over 325 0C. It means there is
a plateau in the TGA thermogram of remaining percentage of the samples’
weight vs. temperature at least in the range 275-325 0C. A small amount of
degradation products from the polyamide usually remains by 600 0C [127].
The plateau is clearly observable in the typical TGA thermogram depicted in
Figure 1-16.
1.5.2 Differential Scanning Calorimetry Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) was the main technique used in the
experimental work. This is because it was able to provide information on
melting and crystallisation temperatures and crystallinity of samples when
they were being heated into the molten state and crystallised during cooling
to room temperature. Additionally, the DSC was used as a ‘furnace” to take
small samples of polyamide and diluent powders to the melt to study the
high temperature solutions. Monitoring could take place in situ whilst
carrying out this preparatory process. It enabled a better understanding of
the initial eutectic formation from the raw mixes of powders.
DSC measures the flow of heat into or out of samples when they are heated
or cooled. Thermal transitions as a function of temperature and time give
quantitative and qualitative information regarding physical (and chemical)
changes such as melting, crystallisation, recrystallisation glass transition
temperatures, cold crystallisations, polymerisation, degradation reactions,
volatilisation or changes in heat capacity. Melting and crystallisation
temperatures can be determined. The amount of crystalline material that
has melted or crystallised can be determined and, by comparison with
literature values for 100% crystalline material, the crystallinity can be found.
There are two types of instrument, “Heat Flow” and “Power Compensated”.
In the first type, the temperature difference between a reference and sample
pan is measured as both are heated in similar situations in a DSC cell. The
other type determines the amount of power required to keep the sample at
the same temperature as a reference as they are both heated in a cell.
52
There are a number of quite different designs for the cells used with both
types of instrument [128 p. 129]. The type used in this work is a Heat Flux
instrument. Figure 1-17presented here shows a cross-section of a DSC cell
for a TA Instruments calorimeter Model 2920 DSC.
Figure 1-17 Cross section of DSC cell (taken from [129 p. 4-5].
There are two methods of treating heating ramps for differential scanning
calorimetry. There is “standard” DSC with a constant ramping rate and
“temperature modulated” DSC (TMDSC) where a sinusoidal or sawtooth
[130] modulation is superimposed on the constant ramping rate. This later
method, developed since 1993 [131], was put forward as having a number of
experimental advantages. It has, however, been more recently recognised
that there can be limitations in the interpretations [132-134], especially with
melting and crystallisation events. The work in this thesis was done under
TMDSC conditions (with the extra calibration required) to utilise the smaller
sample size, increased resolution and sensitivity. Analysis could then still
be done at a Reversing/Non-Reversing level where it was required and
appropriate. Glass transition temperatures are also obtainable where the
crystallinity is not too high. Unfortunately, polyamides are often high in
crystallinity, leading to weak glass transitions.
There is a more extensive discussion of standard DSC, TMDSC and the use
of Lissajous figures to better understand thermal events during TMDSC in
Appendix B. The caveats placed on the use of TMDSC described in this
appendix mean that it was inappropriate to analyse the melting and
crystallisation processes of highly crystalline diluents and very crystalline
polyamides from a TMDSC perspective.
53
Small-molecule diluents remain solidified until the temperature is raised
sufficiently that molecular motion catastrophically breaks down the crystal
structure. The amorphous part of a pure polymer will be reduced in
viscosity with heating to the viscosity at melting and polymer chains
comprising the lamellae will “melt” into this fluid of the same composition.
Blends differ from both of these in that the amorphous part of a polymer is
highly plasticised by the diluent, forming a solution that is of lower viscosity
than the normal polymer melt. The lamellae essentially “dissolve” in this
liquid. Technically the correct usage throughout the thesis should be
dissolution but in many cases there are pure materials melting and blends
dissolving under the same section heading or in the same thermogram. The
common term “melting” has been used for both headings and figure captions
as well as text describing the melting of pure materials. Usage of
“dissolution” has generally only been followed in the text for blends where
there is specific discussion of polymer chains being removed from lamellae
into the liquid.
1.5.2.1 Thermogram Overlays
In general, the DSC thermograms are displayed as overlays with several
thermograms together in a figure. That is done to make better comparisons
between different compositions investigated under the same conditions. The
thermograms are all shown as heat flow in J/g against temperature in
degrees Celsius. All thermograms have exotherms pointing upwards.
The thermograms are spaced out vertically and coloured in a consistent
manner to aid clarity. The colour scheme can be seen in Figure 3-16 in
Section 3.4.4.1. The peak with largest amplitude starts with the endotherm
or exotherm near zero. In practice, that will be either carbazole or
phenothiazine. The other thermograms are placed in order of concentration
through to the polyamide so that trends can easily be seen as they relate to
polyamide concentration. It means that the polyamide curve will be at the
bottom for melting and at the top for crystallisation. The legends are always
with the pure polyamide (100% polyamide) at the top and range down to the
diluent (0% polyamide) at the bottom.
In some cases, the phenothiazine or carbazole peak is extremely large in
amplitude compared to the thermograms of the polyamide or the blends. In
54
those cases the very large peaks have been truncated in the figure so that
the detail of the other materials and/or combinations can be clearly seen.
First time thermograms of blends are generally drawn with a dash and the
repeat runs in the DSC are drawn with a solid line. The exceptions are the
few cases where there is more than one thermogram in the same
concentration range and other line types have been used.
1.5.2.2 Thermograms expected from thermal events
We will now consider the general forms of thermograms resulting from
different types of thermal events. This will facilitate discussion of results in
later chapters.
The DSC thermogram will have a single peak for melting or crystallisation if
the percentage of polyamide is exactly that for the eutectic composition
because at the eutectic triple point the solid changes at one time through
from the solid to the liquid phase or vice versa. The temperature of that
peak will be close to the equilibrium eutectic temperature but will be
modified by the dynamic heating or cooling not exactly being at equilibrium.
There will also be differences in heating and cooling eutectic peaks because
polymers are involved in this study and the normal melting and
crystallisation of polymers do not take place at exactly the same
temperature. Polydispersity of the commercial polymers used will also have
an influence on the outcome.
Consider now the case of polyamide/diluent with a polyamide concentration
different from the eutectic concentration and being heated. In the first stage
of heating, polyamide and the diluent melt up to the limit of solubility of one
material in the other in a eutectic melting peak. That peak temperature is
virtually constant across a wide range of total composition in samples.
There is now a residual of one or other material because the two materials
are not present at exactly the eutectic composition. The solubility of the
excess material will generally increase rapidly at higher temperatures. The
endothermic curve in the thermogram above the eutectic melting peak is due
to the progressive melting of more and more of the residual material as the
temperature is increased in the heating ramp. Eventually the excess is
consumed and the sample is completely liquid with no further melting
55
activity. This can be seen in Berghmans’ chapter of Mathot’s book [135
p. 214 Fig.8.7].
This process results in an endothermic curve above the eutectic melting
peak in the thermogram that takes the shape seen in the second peaks of
Figure 1-18. These peaks have a similar form due to a similar process
taking place, however, the second peak for 25PA6Car extends further as
more carbazole has to be dissolved into the liquid, requiring higher
temperatures to increase the solubility. A higher level of carbazole again
would require even higher temperatures to dissolve all the diluent. This
form of curve will be referred to in the text as a Temperature Limited
Solubility (or TLS) peak. It is interesting that the peak temperature is just a
few degrees before the end of the melting process that defines the totally
liquid state. A plot of melting peak temperatures against composition will be
seen in later chapters to take on the general form of the eutectic phase
diagram (Figure 1-6 of Section 1.2.1.6). There are, however, differences
because the peak temperatures are not the end of melting but peak melting
rate and because the system is not in an equilibrium state.
The forms of the curves are slightly different between excess of diluent and
for excess of polyamide but the principles are the same.
Figure 1-18 Two examples are shown to illustrate this general feature. The upper curve is for 25% polyamide-6 in carbazole and the lower curve for 64% polyamide-6 in carbazole. The first peaks near 195 0C corresponds to melting the eutectic composition and the second peak to melting the “excess” mixture of which there is more in the 25% sample.
56
We have seen in Section 1.2.5.12 that we can have metastable crystalline
forms locked in to lamellae, particularly by fast cooling. These metastable
lamellae have lower melting temperatures than the stable form and undergo
a melting and recrystallisation into the more stable form before the final
melting of the stable form. That can be observed in several variants. We can
see the first melting of the existing metastable crystals absorbing energy,
and later the heat given off in crystallisation of the metastable lamellae prior
to the main peak endothermic melting of the stable form for the
polyamide-6,12 sample in the thermogram below. We can also see a minor
version of these processes taking place for the 60PA612PTh thermogram in
Figure 1-19. This latter thermogram only shows a shoulder early in the
main melting peak.
Figure 1-19 Melting and recrystallisation of metastable crystals before melting the stable crystals. This can either be an extensive endotherm and exotherm pair, as with the pure polyamide, or there can be a subtle dip before the main peak and a shoulder on the leading edge of it for the blend.
1.5.2.3 Assignment of “Spiky” Crystallisations to Carbazole or Phenothiazine
The crystallisation of carbazole and phenothiazine take place extremely
rapidly because the molecules are quite small compared to long polymer
chains. The heat released in crystallising often makes the peak temperature
of crystallisation appear higher than the crystallisation onset temperature.
The form of the crystallisation peak is very distinctive, as can be seen in
Figure 1-20. It is very easy to identify a crystallisation as being from nearly
57
pure carbazole (or phenothiazine), unlike the situation during melting. The
following discussion about carbazole applies equally well to phenothiazine.
The distinctive slight rise in temperature is due to the sample thermocouple
being on the underside of the constantan dimple where the sample pan
rests. The pan contains the molten carbazole that is being cooled. The
carbazole is still molten at the time the thermocouple reduces in
temperature to below the carbazole freezing temperature due to slight
thermal lag in the system. This is because of small but noticeable thermal
resistances between thermocouple and carbazole. The freezing carbazole
within the sample maintains it at the carbazole crystallising temperature so
the thermocouple soon rises again to match that temperature. It takes
approximately 6 s for the heat flow to reach a maximum. In that time the
“Sample” temperature measurement “appears” to increase by 0.44 0C.
Figure 1-20 Displaying the radically different forms of crystallisation peaks for polyamide and diluents allowing identification of the material crystallising. Phenothiazine has a similar crystallisation thermogram form.
The crystallisation of polyamide, however, approximates a broader Gaussian
distribution because it is a polymer crystallising and because the polymer is
polydisperse (Section 1.2.4.5).
1.5.2.4 Phase diagrams derived from thermograms
Three examples are given here of experimental non-equilibrium phase
diagrams. Figure 1-21, is from Cha et al. [8] referred to earlier as closest to
the systems studied here. It used PEG (Mw = 200 Dalton) as the diluent with
58
polyamide-12 as the polyamide with cloud point measurements on
Liquid-Liquid phase separation-and some (undefined) melting and
crystallisation measurements.
Figure 1-21 Experimental phase diagrams measured under the condition of 10°C/min cooling rate: (a) nylon 12/PEG2 00 blend from Char et al. [8], where Tcloud is from cloudpoint measurements, and Tm & Tc are melting and crystallisation temperatures respectively.
130140150160170180190200210220230240250260
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100Polyamide concentration (%wt)
Tem
pera
ture
(0 C)
TmPA69PureTmCarDeprTmEutTcPA69PureTcCarDeprTcEut
Liquid
Solid
Liquid & solid
SolidLiquid
Solid Liquid
LiquidSolid
Figure 1-22 Example of eutectic style non-equilibrium phase diagrams for heating to the liquid state and cooling raw materials and blends of polyamide-69 (PA69) and carbazole (Car) Melting peaks are noted with Tm and crystallisation by Tc. Eutectic points are denoted by TmEut or TcEut respectively and blends having peaks depressed are denoted in the legend by Depr.
59
The other two, Figure 1-22 and Figure 1-23, are typical of those seen in later
chapters, one being a eutectic crystallisation and the other being a
Flory-Huggins style crystallisation. There is some uncertainty in the phase
diagrams having Flory-Huggins crystallisation as to whether the melting
having near-constant melting temperature is a true eutectic or not but the
term eutectic will be used in the text. Figure 1-22 takes the same form as
Figure 1-21 except that Liquid-Liquid phase separation is replaced by
melting and Liquid-Solid phase separation for the crystallisation of the
diluent.
110120130140150160170180190200210220230
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100Polyamide concentration (%wt)
Tem
pera
ture
(0 C)
TmPA69PureTmPA69DeprTmPThDeprTmEutTcPA69PureTcPA69DeprTcPThDepr
Solid
Liquid
Solid & liquidLiquidLiquid & crystallites
Liquid
SolidSolid & liquid
Solid & liquidLiquid
SolidLiquid & crystallites
Solid & liquid
SolidSolid & liquid
Liquid & crystallites LiquidLiquid
Liquid & crystallites
Figure 1-23 Example of Flory-Huggins style non-equilibrium phase diagrams for heating to the liquid state and cooling raw materials and blends of polyamide-69 (PA69) and carbazole (Car) Melting peaks are noted with Tm and crystallisation by Tc. Blends having peaks depressed are denoted in the legend by Depr.
The eutectic style and Flory-Huggins style crystallisations presented in the
various chapters are consistent with the above two types of phase diagrams
in that samples are from ampoule material and temperatures are peak
temperatures. Red coloured text and graphics refer to heating at 5 0C/min
whilst blue is for cooling at 2 0C/min. Phase regions described in black are
common to heating and cooling. Reference to crystallites is where there have
been a small amount of near pure crystallites of polymer with melting and
crystallisation temperatures very close to the pure polyamide. The phase
regions for them are delineated in the liquid region by fine broken lines.
Heavy long dashed lines delineate the melting/crystallisation of polyamide.
60
Heavy short dashes delineate the melting/crystallisation of diluent. Solid
lines delineate the melting/crystallisation of eutectics. Data points are solid
diamonds for pure polyamide, solid squares for polyamide in blends
depressed in peak temperatures, triangles for the diluent and solid circles for
eutectics.
It can be seen in many of the phase diagrams that, where polyamide and
diluent where there has been Flory-Huggins style crystallisation to be also
defined as melt or crystallise almost simultaneously, there is a slight
depression of the transition temperature in a manner similar to that
described by Berghmans [135]. The crystallisation of diluents giving “spiky”
peaks allows definitive assignment of crystallisation peaks. That is not the
case for melting where peaks are Gaussian in form. The assignment of
melting peaks to polyamide or diluent has often been determined for melting
phase diagrams from the order in which the crystallisation has taken place,
recognising that whichever has the higher crystallisation temperature will
also have the higher melting temperature for the same blend. Account is
also taken with this of the area of the peaks in relation to the amount of
material of each in the blend. This has allowed phase diagrams for melting
in the case Flory-Huggins melting rather than as eutectic melting because
often the first melting peak is taking place at near-constant temperature.
There are three alternatives for phase diagrams. One is to consider the
onset of eutectic melting as the solidus and the end of a TLS peak as the
liquidus but this leaves an unusual gap between them right at the eutectic
point caused by the difference between start and ending of eutectic melting.
Another is to do as Visjager, Tervoort and Smith [136] and combine peak
temperatures of eutectic melting with the end of the TLS peak but this is an
unusual combination and would require a different approach where
Flory-Huggins style melting or crystallisation takes place. It has been
decided for consistency to use peak temperatures throughout the phase
diagrams, giving consistency in presentation of information throughout the
whole thesis. As a caveat, it should be recognised that the experimental
conditions differ strongly from equilibrium and that the use of peak
temperatures is not giving the temperatures at which all material is in the
liquid (or solid) state.
61
1.5.3 Simultaneous Differential Thermal Analysis/Thermogravimetric Analysis
Simultaneous Differential Thermal Analysis/Thermogravimetric Analysis
(SDT) allows combined TGA and DSC to be run on a sample at the same
time. It does not have quite the same TGA or DSC sensitivity as the
individual instruments. It does have major benefits in allowing rapid
assessment of materials from a large selection of materials. Melting,
evaporation and degradation can be assessed from a single fast experimental
run. This allowed the efficient selection of candidate materials for the work
based on having high melting temperatures and the material not evaporating
too quickly in the working range to 300 0C.
A typical analysis curve obtained from this technique is shown below in Figure 1-24.
Figure 1-24 Example of Simultaneous Differential Thermal Analysis
with Thermogravimetric Analysis (SDT) for Flourenone.
The dashed curve of the temperature difference between the sample and an
inert reference shows the melting of fluorenone just above 80 0C followed by
the evaporation of the molten fluorenone. The solid curve does not show any
significant weight loss at the melting temperature but the sample mass has
been reduced to zero by 255 0C due to evaporation in the nitrogen gas
stream. The maximum feasible working temperature for combination with
polyamides in a DSC pan would be just above 150 0C, too low for polyamides
that melt at 209-290 0C.and may have to be taken up to 307 0C to remove
residual lamellar nuclei. Approximately 20 candidate materials were quickly
62
evaluated this way, leaving carbazole and phenothiazine as the only
reasonable ones left.
1.5.4 Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy 1.5.4.1 General
Infrared spectroscopy is a technique that measures the interaction between
a material and infrared (IR) frequency electromagnetic radiation. It is
commonly used in the mid range frequencies of 4000 to 400 cm-1. This is the
region where molecular vibrations and rotations show absorbance bands
that are characteristic of the atoms involved in the bonds. Atomic bonds in
a molecule can generate absorbance bands in the far, mid and near infrared,
regions. Energy is absorbed when the frequency of the irradiating
electromagnetic waves is in resonance with characteristic modes of
molecular movements such as bond stretching, vibrations and rotations.
Changes in the states of groups of atoms in a polymer molecule can cause
shifts in the absorbance bands. These can contribute to our understanding
of what is happening to the molecules or parts of molecules and it is this
area that is important when looking for the influence of changed hydrogen
bond environments [42, 112, 113]. Each specific chemical environment will
have characteristic frequencies where infrared radiation is absorbed. In
principle, this allows the determination of molecular structures from the
infrared “fingerprint”, however full interpretation can be difficult because of
the myriad of different possibilities with reasonably sized organic molecules.
It is quite easy, for example, to discriminate at four or five places across the
mid IR spectrum between the various polyamides used in the trials. Various
authors have discriminated between amorphous and crystalline states of
polyamides [82] and between various crystallographic forms of polyamides
[82, 137, 138] including Brill transitions [91] using a variety of FTIR
techniques. Polyamide interactions with liquid crystal oligomers have also
been detected [139], as have those with fibre reinforcement [140].
The majority of work on Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) is in
the mid range of the IR spectrum but the Near IR (NIR) in the range 11,000
to 4000 cm-1 is very sensitive to subtle differences in hydrogen bonding.
We will see later that the original premise of hydrogen bond destruction with
polyamides by the potential hydrogen bond acceptors, carbazole and
phenothiazine, was cast into doubt by the mid range IR work. This prompted
63
validation by NIR investigations in general bands identified as being related
to hydrogen bond interaction with polyamides [141].
Earlier instruments were dispersive but these have largely been supplanted
by inexpensive, rugged Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy instruments
that allow relatively quick measurements to be made with extremely high
signal-to-noise ratios. A Nicolet 750 FTIR instrument was used for the
work.
There are a variety of FTIR techniques available to use:
a) Attenuated Total Reflection(ATR)
b) Transmission of solutions
c) Transmission of cast thin films
d) Diffuse Reflectance Infrared Fourier Transform (DRIFT) spectroscopy
where the infrared sample beam is deflected downwards onto the surface
of a sample with an elliptic mirror. Any diffuse IR reflection from the
surface is collected with another elliptical mirror and focussed back into
a beam incident on the detector. One advantage of this technique is that
samples directly as formed may be examined without disrupting the
morphology or chemical interactions between molecules.
e) Photoacoustic Spectroscopy (PAS) studies utilise the generation of
thermal waves in the sample upon infrared absorption. This leads to
acoustic waves being propagated within the sample and into the
surrounding gas. A sensitive microphone picks up the acoustic signal
and amplifies it to give spectra as the IR frequency is swept across the
mid infrared spectrum. The original principle dates back to the 1800s.
It has been applied in FTIR for the last dozen years or so.
The first three techniques were not utilised because they involved
modification of the bulk samples in ways that would alter their morphology
at the detecting surface or in the bulk.
Photoacoustic (PAS) detection was used for the Mid IR range experiments
because it is more suitable than DRIFT when looking at small differences in
frequency. The photoacoustic approach does have a disadvantage in that
the heights and areas of peaks do not necessarily represent the relative
intensities of the absorption of IR. There can be an attenuation of strong
64
signals. This will be discussed below. In this particular case, the
advantages of using material in its native morphology and having very
accurate peak frequencies outweigh the drawbacks due to non-linearity.
DRIFT was used for the NIR experiments because the instrument signal was
far superior to the photoacoustic signal with that part of the IR spectrum.
1.5.4.2 Mid Range IR and hydrogen bond Interactions
Polyamides have an N-H stretch with a large peak near 3300 cm-1. The
normal situation for polyamides is to be strongly hydrogen bonded from the
carbonyl oxygen through the amide hydrogen to the nitrogen of another
amide group on the same polymer molecule or another molecule. The large
peak near 3300 cm-1 represents the bound state because the vast majority of
potential hydrogen bonds are consummated at room temperature [48
p. 270].
The state of the N-H bond in carbazole material is normally unbound. There
is a major N-H peak at 3441 cm-1. There should be a shift in the IR peaks
for the N-H from polyamide-4,6 and the N-H peak from the carbazole if the
carbazole molecules replace polyamide N-H in the hydrogen bond structure.
The carbazole N-H will then become bound and the polyamide N-H will
become unbound. There should have been shifts in both towards each other
of about 10 cm-1 if there were any substantial complexing of the two
materials with hydrogen bonding.
Guerra et al. [142] found shifts of 58 cm-1 in N-H stretching band maxima as
they altered the percentages in their hydrogen bond interacting blends.
The N-H stretch for polyamide-6 film increases by 18 cm-1 in being heated
from 50 to 227.5 0C in work by Xu et al. [143] due to the reduction in bound
hydrogen bonds and a move to less restricted N-H bonds. The same paper
shows a shift to the right in the melt of polyamide-6/LiBr compared with
pure polyamide-6 because the amide-amide hydrogen bonds are supplanted
by the intense ionic bonds with the salt.
Gao and Scheinbeim studied interactions between Nylon-11 and
poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVF2) [144]. They found a shift in the N-H stretch
by up to 8 cm-1 as the level of PVF2 was increased. This shift was to lower
wavenumbers because the F…N-H hydrogen bond was stronger than the
C=O…N-H bond. That is obviously in the opposite direction to that expected
65
if the N-H of carbazole or phenothiazine were to supplant the amide N-H
bond to O=C on another amide group thus freeing up an amide N-H. It is
therefore a useful benchmark for the type of change expected.
Skrovanek et al. also looked at semicrystalline Nylon-11 considering the
effects of temperature increases leading to the melt [61]. They found a shift
in the peak of the main N-H stretch of 32 cm-1 to higher wavenumbers in
that process as the temperature was raised and the hydrogen bonds
weakened. In their case the normalised area of the peaks reduced in
sympathy with the temperature increase.
Wang, Ma and Wu [145] solution blended polyamide-6 or polyamide-6,6 into
“Novolac”, a phenolic resin. The aim was to reduce the brittleness of the
Novolac by using intermolecular hydrogen bonding of the materials in the
blends. They did not specify explicitly in the paper the extent of the FTIR
frequency shifts they found but their figures 5 and 6 plotting the spectra for
various blends make it clear that substantial shifts have, in fact, taken
place. The O-H of the Novolac has changed by something in the order of
70 cm-1.
The focus of this Mid-Range IR work will be on the N-H stretch as that is the
major area where the disruption of C=O….H-N(amide) with “free” N-H(diluent)
to produce C=O….H-N (diluent,-“bound”) and “free” N-H(amide) would be
expected to have an effect. Peak frequency was used as the determinant of
N-H changes rather than the more risky deconvolution of non-linear PAS
signals of composite spectra from different materials (vide infra). The
results, above, from other authors’ work gave the confidence that this would
be suitable to discriminate changes in hydrogen bonding activity.
1.5.4.3 Mid Range IR Frequencies of Interest
The relevant absorption frequencies for FTIR investigations described in
Chapters 3 to 10 for the different combinations of polyamide-4,6
polyamide-6, polyamide-6,9 or polyamide-6,12 with carbazole and with
phenothiazine are brought together in Appendix C: FTIR Assignments to
avoid undue repetition.
The Photoacoustic (PAS) spectrum of polyamide-4,6 is seen in Figure 1-25
below. The other polyamides in the study have peaks that are close but not
66
quite identical to the above. The slight differences across several absorbing
bands can be used to positively identify polyamide types.
Polyamide-4,6
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65 Ph
otoa
cous
tic
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 Wavenumbers (cm-1)
Figure 1-25 Mid Range IR spectrum of polyamide-4,6 from an ampoule
The bands for carbazole are shown in the PAS spectrum of Figure 1-26 and
for phenothiazine are shown in Figure 1-27.
Carbazole
10
20
30
40
50
Phot
oaco
ustic
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500Wavenumbers (cm-1)
Figure 1-26 Carbazole photoacoustic FTIR peaks in the Mid Range IR
67
Phenothiazine
40
80
120
160
200
Phot
oaco
ustic
500 10001500 2000 2500 3000 3500Wavenumbers (cm-1)
Figure 1-27 Phenothiazine photoacoustic FTIR peaks in the Mid Range IR.
1.5.4.4 Mid Infrared Data Analysis for Blends
The original PAS spectra of polyamide-4,6 (Ampoule 64) and carbazole
(Ampoule 63) are overlaid in Figure 1-28 with the spectrum of the ampoule
material 66PA46Car (Ampoule 31) to demonstrate an FTIR analysis problem.
Carbazole Polyamide-4,6 66PA46Car
5
10 15
20
25
30
35
40
45 50
55 60
65
Phot
oaco
ustic
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
Wavenumbers (cm-1) Figure 1-28 PAS spectra in Mid IR for carbazole, polyamide-4,6 and a blend.
It can be seen from Figure 1-28 that each of the spectra for the raw
materials has a large number of sharp peaks. The spectrum for ampoule
68
material from a blend takes on approximately the combined peaks of the two
raw materials. The peak from one constituent material of a blend may lie on
a sharply rising or falling portion of the other material’s spectrum. The
combined effect can result in a shift in peak frequency even if there are no
changes in hydrogen bond interactions or morphology due to blending. The
Photoacoustic technique is usually non-linear for strong peaks. Spectral
additivity cannot normally be expected. There was a conundrum, however,
because there was a large problem here with the interpretation of spectra.
The following mathematical modelling was employed in an attempt to see if
the infrared spectra indicated interaction between the polyamide and the
small molecules. The spectra of the two constituents were mathematically
added in a proportion that mimicked the salient features of the spectrum of
the blend material. It was done in order to look for regions where the blend
spectrum was different from that expected for no interactions involved.
Differences between the model and experimental results could potentially be
indicative of frequency shifts. It was reasonably strong evidence for no
hydrogen bond interaction or crystallographic/morphology changes to have
taken place if the “model” and experimental peaks matched up precisely.
Any artefact caused by the simple model would have to be exactly the same
magnitude but of the opposite direction to actual chemical shifts, an unlikely
scenario. The importance of relative height changes of double and treble
peaks was considered low.
Regions of each constituent spectrum were chosen where there was a
significant peak in one material but not in the other. The spectra of the two
materials were mathematically added and scaled to match the spectrum of
the ampoule material at both points. Sometimes more points were selected
to assist in the match. Generally the peaks that were chosen were ones
where the signal for one material was reasonably high and the other material
had a low signal at that point. The highest peaks were not chosen as primary
ones as they were likely to be non-linear due to sensor saturation. The
match to the actual identified peaks would thus be due to having the correct
proportions of each material in the model. Examples of the spectral regions
chosen are given in Figure 1-29. Secondary peaks have the spectrum of the
other material is rising or falling strongly in that region or the peak is a very
high one which is likely to be truncated by signal saturation.
69
Carbazole peak and low Polyamide-4,6 absorbanceCarbazole confirmatory peak
Confirmatory peak for Polyamide-4,6
Polyamide-4,6 peak andlow carbazole absorbance
Carbazole Polyamide-4,6
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
Phot
oaco
ustic
5001000150020002500300035004000Wavenumbers (cm-1)
Figure 1-29 Peaks used for modelling polyamide-4,6/carbazole blend spectra in Mid IR.
An example of a model compared with a measured spectrum for a blend is
given in Figure 1-30.
*Addition* model 23PA46Car
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
Phot
oaco
ustic
5001000150020002500300035004000Wavenumbers (cm-1)
Figure 1-30 Mid IR PAS spectrum of 23PA46Car from Ampoule 57 with the model constructed from the spectra from polyamide-4,6 and carbazole.
This is expanded for the carbazole N-H stretching peak and the peak heights
equalised in Figure 1-31.
70
*Addition* model 23PA46Car
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
Phot
oaco
ustic
33803390340034103420343034403450Wavenumbers (cm-1)
Figure 1-31 Carbazole N-H stretch for 23PA46Car and model expanded from the comparison in Figure 1-30 and equalised in height.
PAS does have a disadvantage that strong peaks will cause signal saturation
resulting in some truncation of peak heights. That applies particularly to
the major peaks for spectra of the constituent materials. The
mathematically combined spectra will therefore also give partly compressed
tops of major peaks. These peaks are then expanded vertically in the graphs
to give peaks that can be easily compared for peak frequency with the
measured ones for the polyamide/diluent blend material from the ampoules.
The rounding of the peak tips, as seen in Figure 1-31, is an artefact of
expanding the models based on non-linear spectra to give the same peak
heights for comparison. The reason the models are built primarily on
significant peaks that are not the largest peaks for each material is to
construct the model minimising the effects of signal saturation. The spectra
for polyamide/diluent blend samples are less compressed at peak tops
compared with the constituent spectra that the models were based on. Each
highly absorbing peak is less saturated in the measured blend spectrum.
Peak signals for blend materials are reduced in intensity by dilution because
of the presence of the other material in the sample. The peak signals are
then more linear because there is less detector saturation. The positions of
peaks are the critical issues rather than the rounding.
71
It can be seen above that analysis without mathematical modelling would be
extremely difficult but simple mathematical addition of spectra can result in
artefacts due to non-linearity in the major spectral peaks for the constituent
materials. A comparison between a measured blend spectral peak and a
model from spectra of the constituent materials with no change in the peak
frequency should be strong evidence for the materials not interacting. Slight
height differences between sharp measured peaks and a model based on the
spectra of the constituents may or may not be indicative of an interaction,
given the non-linearity of the detector system.
1.5.4.5 Near Infrared FTIR (NIR)
The NIR region is noted in the literature [141] for being sensitive to the
hydrogen bond status. The broad FTIR peaks for hydrogen bonding can be
examined in the Near Infrared (NIR) at moderate sensitivity and resolution.
The area of interest is in the 7500 to 4000 cm-1 region. The Nicolet 750
instrument can be set up for the Near Infrared region with wavenumbers
between 11,000 and 3,000 cm-1. This requires some changes to the physical
configuration of the instrument regarding the beam splitter, light source and
detector. The DRIFT technique was the most appropriate.
Wu and Siesler [141] studied polyamide-11 in this band. The frequencies in
the Near Infrared they found were 6912, 6600, 6390, 6290, 6180, 4940,
4846, 4580 and 4560 cm-1. Values found with the polyamides here were
close to those values. A typical polyamide spectrum is shown in Figure 1-32.
Abso
rban
ce
4500 7500 Wavenumbers (cm-1) Figure 1-32 Typical polyamide DRIFT spectrum in the NIR region.
No NIR peak values were located in the literature for carbazole or
phenothiazine.
72
The spectra for these two are shown below in Figure 1-33
carbazole phenothiazine
Abso
rban
ce
4500 7500 Wavenumbers (cm-1) Figure 1-33 Carbazole and phenothiazine Near Infrared spectra as
measured with DRIFT.
The peaks for the polyamides compared to those of the diluents are quite
separate and are not so steep as in parts of the Mid Range IR so it was not
necessary to resort to the mathematical additions of spectra. There was a
facility in the Omnic software used to drag an individual spectrum from a
group up or down to match the height on screen of another spectrum peak.
That facility was used to move each peak from the spectrum for a blend to
match the equivalent peaks for those of the spectra for the constituents.
1.5.5 Small Angle X-ray Scattering Small Angle X-ray Scattering (SAXS) can be used to gain information about
semicrystalline polymers at a dimensional range around the size of lamellae
and relates to their stacking within a solid. Periodically stacked lamellae
reflect X-rays more strongly than amorphous regions because of the higher
density (and therefore electron density). This occurs with Bragg reflections
at scattering angles of 2Θ according to the well known relationship of sin
Θ = mλ/2d where m is an integer giving the order of scattering, λ is the
wavelength of the X-rays (in this case) and d is the periodicity distance of the
scatterers. For example, an X-ray wavelength of 0.154 nm for first order
scattering giving a peak at 2Θ of 0.80 equates to a scattering periodicity near
12 nm.
An opportunity arose early in the making of ampoules to have some samples
measured with SAXS by another University of South Australia PhD student
who was working briefly at Connecticut University. He was able to carry out
a very restricted number of trials because, at that stage, only a handful of
73
ampoules had been produced. The conclusions from these are limited but
the results have been included for the benefit of other researchers.
1.5.6 Solid state Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy FTIR, discussed above, looks at how the frequencies of interatomic bonds are
influenced in their various modes of vibration by the atoms at the ends of
the bonds and by the near-neighbour environment. Nuclear Magnetic
Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy is interested in the nuclei of atoms and how
they are influenced by near-neighbours. The nuclei of 1H, 13C 15N and some
isotopes of other elements act as if they are spinning. It is possible, by
placing them within strong magnetic fields and irradiating them with radio
frequency (rf) electromagnetic radiation, to have them absorb energy. They
appear to precess in the way the top of a spinning top gyrates in slower
circles as the top spins. The combinations of magnetic field and rf frequency
where the absorption occurs can be used to determine the environments of
the nuclei. For example, the five hydrogen atoms attached directly to a
benzene ring having an attached O-H group will have absorptions at three
slightly different frequencies, one for the H atom directly opposite the O-H
bond, there will be a peak twice as large and at a slightly different frequency
for the two atoms next to it and another peak the same size as the previous
one for the two hydrogen atoms attached to carbon atoms either side of the
O-H group. There will also be a peak of the same size as the original peak,
but at a noticeably different frequency, for the hydrogen atom attached to
the oxygen atom of the O-H group. Similarly differing 13C environments will
produce different 13C peaks depending on the environments of the nuclei.
The measurements can either be carried out by keeping the rf irradiation
constant and modulating the strong magnetic field or by keeping the
magnetic field constant and varying the rf field. Usually the latter approach
is taken nowadays with the advent of strong superconducting magnets and
the ability to give a sharp pulse of rf radiation which populates all the atoms
at the same time. The response as a function of time is deconvoluted to give
the final output.
These measurements can be carried out in solution or of solid materials.
Solidified small organic molecules have sharp peaks because the
environments around the nuclei are quite regular. Even highly crystalline
polymers always have a considerable amount of disordered amorphous
74
polymer material outside the spherulitic regions and in the interlamellar
spaces. This leads to the absorption peaks being smeared out. It is often
possible, however, to infer things from solid state NMR spectroscopy where
the material is being left in its original morphological state.
It was for this reason, that the opportunity to have solid state NMR
measurements made on some blend material from ampoules was taken up
in order to better understand the materials we were working with. A brief
window in time occurred after the production of Ampoule 1 for NMR
measurements to be carried out by Dr. Andrew Whittaker at Queensland
University on red and white sections from the ampoule plus polyamide-4,6
and carbazole powders. The white sample proved too hard to make into a
fine powder at the time so only the red blend could be measured along with
the constituent powders. The results proved ambiguous. They have been
included in Chapter 3 to make them available for other researchers.
1.6 Structure of the Thesis The thesis covers much work that is of the same structure from chapter to
chapter covering different material combinations. A brief description of the
various chapters follows.
Chapter 2: Experimental
The second chapter covers all experimental details and scant reference is
made in other chapters to these details.
Chapters 3 to 10: The polyamides combined with the diluents
These chapters cover the experimental work on various combinations of
polyamides with either carbazole or phenothiazine. A chapter is devoted to
each combination. The polyamides polyamide-4,6, polyamide-6,
polyamide-6,9 and polyamide-6,12 in that order are combined firstly with
carbazole. The last four chapters of this block cover the above four
polyamides combined with phenothiazine.
There is much that is similar from chapter to chapter within this group of
chapters but there is also much information that is different from one
material combination to another. As a result of the consistent approach
taken in the experimental work and in analysing the data, the chapters
could appear repetitive. This will not be helped where the outcomes from
one material combination to the next happen to be similar.
75
The chapters give only low-level conclusions on the results seen. This is the
most appropriate because often the outcomes of experimental work on one
or more combinations of the various polyamides with either of carbazole or
phenothiazine are best evaluated together in the final conclusions chapter.
Chapter 11 General Conclusions
This chapter draws the previous eight chapters together in overall
conclusions. The differences between the polyamides in the way they interact
in high temperature solution and in crystallising to solid blends are covered
in the context of the molecular structure of the individual polyamides. The
common aspects are more oriented to how polyamides generally interact with
these specific small molecules.
This work has covered a reasonable tract with non-isothermal DSC and FTIR
and could be considered as a pilot study. There are a number of aspects
that could be pursued to further the scientific understanding and to pursue
applications of this research. A list of questions that the work raises is
provided in the hope that the opportunity will arise for them to be
investigated.
Appendices
Appendix A: Further details from DSC thermograms
Appendix B: Lissajous Figures for Understanding Temperature Modulated
Differential Scanning Calorimetry of Nylons
Appendix C: Mid Range Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy
Assignments
Appendix D on CD: Fourier Transform Infrared spectra (PDF format) of
blends with mathematical models or with spectra of
constituent materials. The CD contains the whole thesis
Bibliography
Bibliography of all references in the thesis.
1.7 Summary This introductory chapter to the thesis explained how aliphatic polyamides,
commonly called nylons, are an important class of engineering polymers,
that it is important to understand their properties more fully to utilise them
76
to best advantage and how this work contributes to the virtually untapped
knowledge of their characteristics in high temperature solutions with low
molecular mass diluents. It went on to take the reader through from the
background information on mixtures of materials, hydrogen bonding, the
structure, melting and crystallisation of semicrystalline polymers, and led to
the specific case of aliphatic polyamides. This continued into a survey of
some of the recent literature in areas adjacent to the specific area of interest,
leading to a description of the research problem. A description was then
given of techniques suited to investigating the research problem and the
reasons. The details of expected outcomes of certain techniques were
provided in some cases including the “TLS peak” often found when heating
blends in the DSC and of mathematical modelling blend spectra in the Mid
IR range using the spectra of the constituent materials.
It is now time to look at Chapter 2 with its description of the experimental
conditions used for the techniques.