Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Intrinsic properties of phaseIntrinsic properties of phase--pure Copure Co-- and and MnMn--doped doped ZnOZnO epitaxial filmsepitaxial films
S.A. ChambersFundamental and Computational Sciences DirectoratePacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA
Work funded by US Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences,Division of Materials Science & Engineering
SPINTECH V – July 7-11, 2009 -- Krakow, Poland
CollaboratorsCollaboratorsCollaborators
T.C. Kaspar, T. Droubay, C.M. Wang, V. Shutthanandan, P. Nachimuthu, M.
Engelhard, Z. Zhu – PNNL
C.A. Johnson, K.M. Whittaker, K.R. Kittilstved, D.R. Gamelin –
U. Washington
S.M. Heald, D.E Keavney – APS/ANL
A. Ney, K. Ollefs, S. Ye, T. Kammermeier, V. Ney – U. Duisburg-Essen
F. Wilhelm, A. Rogalev – ESRF
OutlineOutline
Introduction – spin-spin and spin-lattice interactions in dilute magnetic oxides
Co-doped ZnO/-Al2O3:1. Previous work -- theoretical predictions & experiments2. Epitaxial growth by PLD3. Structural, electronic and magnetic properties
Mn-doped ZnO/-Al2O3:1. Epitaxial growth (PLD) & properties2. Indirect evidence for spinoidal decomposition3. Review of traditional assumptions on dopant distributions –a new model for nanomaterials
Summary
M+n M+n
carrier mediated exchange
M+n M+(n-1)
double exchange
e-
Dopant spin interactions in epitaxial oxide filmsDopantDopant spin interactions in epitaxial oxide filmsspin interactions in epitaxial oxide films
mag. dopant
host cation
lattice defect
defect mediated exchange
super exchange
oxygen host cation
magnetic dopant (M)
New physics -- Coey & Chambers, “Oxide Dilute Magnetic Semiconductors – Fact or Fiction?”, MRS Bulletin 33, 1053 (2008).
typically AF
“How do we control materials processes at the level of electrons?”
Why ZnO?Why Why ZnOZnO??
Reasonable electron mobilities (in epitaxial films).
Direct gap semiconductor – strong emission in the UV.
Suitable for transparent high-T applications.
Spin coherence up to (at least) 280K.
Long spin lifetimes (~200 ps) at 280K.
n-ZnO/-Al2O3(001)Ghosh et al., APL 96, 232507 (2005)
H:ZnO/-Al2O3(001)Li et al., APL 92 ,152105 (2008)
40
35
30
25
20
15
Mob
ility
(cm
2 /V
s)
300250200150100500Temperature (K)
PL
inte
nsity
(arb
. uni
ts)
385380375370365360wavelength (nm)
T=4K
H2
O2
bulk ZnO
(a)
H:ZnO/-Al2O3(001)Li et al., JAP 104 ,053711 (2008)
Theoretical predictions Theoretical predictions –– Mn:ZnOMn:ZnO
Dietl, Ohno, Matsukura, Cibert, Ferrand, Science 287, 1019 (2000)
300K
Mn2+-doped (5%), p-type - 3.5x1020 cm-3)
Sato, Katayama-Yoshida, Physica E10, 251 (2001)
80 40 0 40 80Ene
rgy
diffe
renc
e (m
Ry)
0
30
15
-15
N concentration (%) Ga concentration (%)
Ferro stable
Para Stable
Mn:ZnO
CPA + KKR
p-type n-type
Theoretical predictions Theoretical predictions Co:ZnOCo:ZnO
LDA
LDA-SIC
Toyoda et al.Physica B (2006)
half metallicity!
e↓ t2↓
e↑ t2↑
Co(II) + e-CB ↔ Co(I)
Sato et al.SST (2002)
CPA + KKR
10 5 0 -5binding energy relative to Fermi level (eV)
x10
ZnO(001)Co (x=0.05):ZnO(001)
Co 3d derived
10 5 0 -5binding energy relative to Fermi level (eV)
x10
ZnO(001)Co (x=0.05):ZnO(001)
Co 3d derived
Spin coupling in CoSpin coupling in CoxxZnZn11--xxOO
n P(x=0.10,n) 0 0.281 0.382 0.233 0.084 0.025 0.00
Co2+
t2
e
?E = 10Dq
Co2+
t2
e
E = 10Dq
Co2+
t2
e
?E = 10Dq
Co2+
t2
e
E = 0.6 eV
Co(II) – 3.0 B(orbital moment
quenched)
Ms ≤ ~(1/3)*3= ~1 B/Co
Co
O
m surroundingcation sites(Zn or Co)
For a given x, what is the probability of finding n dopants in m sites? 1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0P
(x,n
)0.300.200.100.00
x
P(x,n=0)P(x,n=1)P(x,n=2)P(x,n=3)P(x,n=4)P(x,n=5)
m = 12
?
AF – Dietl et al.PRB 2007
nmn xxnmn
mnxP
)1()!(!
!),(
Abundant & widely divergent results for Co: Abundant & widely divergent results for Co: ZnOZnO!!More than 400 papers!!Room-temperature ferromagnetism with “giant” moments
of ~3.36 B/Co polycrystalline n-AlxCo0.05Zn0.95O grown by sputtering -- Liu, J. Phys:Cond. Mat. (2007)
Paramagnetism only in OPAMBE-grown n-CoxZn1-x /-Al2O3(001) (x = 0 0.15) -- Pacuski et al., PRB (2006)
Intermediate ferromagnetism (≤ 0.2 – 0.4 B/Co) in OPAMBE-grown n-CoxZn1-x /-Al2O3(001) (x = 0 0.12) that didn’t scale with conductivity – Liu et al., APL (2007)
Questions about material quality & adequacy of characterization
OffOff--axis PLD of Coaxis PLD of Co-- & & MnMn--doped doped ZnOZnO on on --AlAl22OO33(001) (001) & (012) from & (012) from nanoparticlenanoparticle & conventional targets& conventional targets
Gamelin Group - UWSchwartz et al, JACS (2003)
increasing OH-
(1-x)Zn(OAc)2 + xCo(OAc)2 + 2NMe4OH Co2+:ZnO + H2O + 2NMe4OAc
Possible structures Possible structures -- CoCo0.10.1ZnZn0.90.9O (001)/O (001)/--AlAl22OO33(001) (001)
lattice mismatch = -32%
OZnOOAl2O3
aZnO || asub aZnO || asubcos30
OZnO
OAl2O3
Alignment of the O sublattices gives greater stability
lattice mismatch = +18%
Structure Structure –– CoCo0.10.1ZnZn0.90.9O(001)/O(001)/--AlAl22OO33(001) (001)
Al2O3 (202)Al2O3 (202)Al2O3 (202)Al2O3 (202)Al2O3 (202)Al2O3 (202)
ZnO (101)ZnO (101)
c-Al2O3
c-Co:ZnO
c-Al2O3
c-Co:ZnO
Inte
nsity
(arb
. uni
ts)
191817161514 (degrees)
ZnO(002)
FWHM = 0.061°
Inte
nsity
100806040202 (degrees)
ZnO(002)
ZnO(004)Al
2O3
Al2O 3
Al2O
3
Inte
nsity
(arb
. uni
ts)
191817161514 (degrees)
ZnO(002)
FWHM = 0.061°
Inte
nsity
100806040202 (degrees)
ZnO(002)
ZnO(004)Al
2O3
Al2O 3
Al2O
3
out of plane
Inte
nsity
(arb
. uni
ts)
6766656463 (degrees)
ZnO(104)
FWHM = 0.073°
Inte
nsity
-100 0 100Phi (degrees)
ZnO(104)
6766656463 (degrees)
ZnO(104)
FWHM = 0.073°
6766656463 (degrees)
ZnO(104)
FWHM = 0.073°
Inte
nsity
-100 0 100Phi (degrees)
ZnO(104)
Inte
nsity
-100 0 100Phi (degrees)
ZnO(104)
in plane
(101) pole figure
epitaxial relationship:(110)ZnO || (012)Al2O3 & [001]ZnO || [011]Al2O3 a-Co:ZnO on r-sapphire
a/a = 1.53% along [001]ZnO= 18.3% along [110]ZnO
Structure – Co0.1Zn0.9O/-Al2O3(012) Structure Structure –– CoCo0.10.1ZnZn0.90.9O/O/--AlAl22OO33(012) (012) In
tens
ity (
arb
. uni
ts)
313029282726 (degrees)
ZnO(110)
Al 2O
3
FWHM =0.088°
Inte
nsity
706560555045402 (degrees)
Al2O
3 ZnO(110)
Inte
nsity
(ar
b. u
nits
)
313029282726 (degrees)
ZnO(110)
Al 2O
3
FWHM =0.088°
Inte
nsity
706560555045402 (degrees)
Al2O
3 ZnO(110)
out of plane
Inte
nsity
(ar
b.un
its)
33.032.532.031.531.030.5 (degrees)
ZnO(211)
FWHM =0.127 °
Inte
nsity
-100 0 100Phi (degrees)
ZnO(211)
Inte
nsity
(ar
b.un
its)
33.032.532.031.531.030.5 (degrees)
ZnO(211)
FWHM =0.127
Inte
nsity
-100 0 100Phi (degrees)
ZnO(211)
in plane
r-Al2O3 a-Co:ZnO r-Al2O3
a-Co:ZnO
1 nm a-Co:ZnO1 nm a-Co:ZnO
Zeroing in on the dopant –x-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS)
Zeroing in on the Zeroing in on the dopantdopant ––xx--ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS)ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS)
Co
O
Zn
E
K
L2
L3
VB (full) CB (empty)
binding energy
dens
ity o
f sta
tes K
L2
L3
VB (full) CB (empty)
binding energy
dens
ity o
f sta
tes
Heald et al., Phys Rev. B 79, 075202 (2009) Chambers, Adv. Mat., in press (2009)Ney et al. submitted (2009)
XX--ray absorption nearray absorption near--edge spectroscopy (XANES) &edge spectroscopy (XANES) &extended xextended x--ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS)ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS)
SrCo0.01Ti0.99O3
x-ray energy (eV)
norm
aliz
ed a
bsor
ptio
n,
Co K-edge EXAFS
810080007900780077007600
Co K-shell XAS
CoTiO3CoOCo
-20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50E – Eo (eV)
Eo = 7708.8 eVCoTiO3CoOCo
-20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50E – Eo (eV)
Eo = 7708.8 eV
Nor
mal
ized
abs
orpt
ion,
E
o
Co0.04Ti0.96O2
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
k (
k)
k (Å-1)
s polarizationp polarization
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
F(R
)
R (Å)
(k) = [(k) - o(k)]/o(k)= (fk/kR2)sin[2kR + o(k)]
x exp(-R – 22k2)
F(R) = ∫(k)exp(ikR)dkk1
k2
XX--ray magnetic circular ray magnetic circular dichroismdichroism (XMCD)(XMCD)
= IL3l – IL3r
= IL2l – IL2r
Circularly polarized x-rays & magnetic field.Angular momentum of x-ray is transferred (in part)
to the spin of the bound electron via spin-orbit coupling.Right circular photons transfer opposite
momentum as left circular photons.Spin states are opposite in 2p3/2 (L3) & 2p1/2 (L2)No spin flip during photoexcitation.2p↑ 3d↑ and 2p↓ 3d↓Circularly polarized excitation senses spin
imbalance in the unoccupied d states.Dichroism = AL-R = measure of spin imbalance in
empty statesAtom specific magnetometry
Co speciation Co speciation –– Co:ZnO/Co:ZnO/--AlAl22OO33(001)(001)X
-ray
abs
orpt
ion
(arb
. uni
ts)
50403020100-10X-ray energy, E-Eo (eV)
10% Co:ZnO/Al2O3 conv
Co metal
CoTiO3CoO
Co K-edge XANES - APS2% Co:ZnO/Al2O3 nano
Co is Co(II), but not CoOStrong hybridization to O
Co 1s 3ddipole forbiddenweakly allowed for
Co 3d and O 2p mixing
Kaspar et al., PRB 77, 201303(R) (2008)
Co local structure Co local structure –– Co:ZnO/Co:ZnO/--AlAl22OO33(001)(001)
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
(R
) (Å
-3)
6543210R (Å)
10% Co:ZnO conv (Co K-edge)2% Co:ZnO nano (Co K-edge)
pure ZnO (Zn K-edge)Co & Zn K-edge EXAFS - APS
Co(II) substitutes for Zn
XX--ray linear ray linear dichroismdichroism (XLD) (XLD) ––Co:ZnO/Co:ZnO/--AlAl22OO33(001)(001)
Ney et al., PRL 100, 157201 (2008)
> 95% of Co at lattice sites
Co LCo L--edge XMCD edge XMCD –– Co:ZnO/Co:ZnO/--AlAl22OO33(001)(001)
0.010
0.005
0.000
-0.005
-0.010
XM
CD
(arb
. uni
ts)
-4 -2 0 2 4H (T)
T=50K0.010
0.005
0.000
-0.005
-0.010
XM
CD
(arb
. uni
ts)
-4 -2 0 2 4H (T)
T=50K
Co(II) is paramagnetic
Photon Energy (eV)Photon Energy (eV)
0.26
0.24
0.22
0.20
0.18
0.16
XA
S (
I R+
I L)/2
10
5
0
XM
CD
(IR-IL )
T=50K H=4T
-5
-10
800795790785780775770-15 x 10-3
0.26
0.24
0.22
0.20
0.18
0.16
XA
S (
I+
I)/2
10
5
0
XM
CD
(I-I
T=50K H=4T
-5
-10
800795790785780775770-15 x 10-3
40x10-3
30
20
10
XM
CD
(a.
u.)
30025020015010050Temperature (K)
H=5T40x10-3
30
20
10
XM
CD
(a.
u.)
30025020015010050Temperature (K)
H=5T
40x10-3
30
20
10
0
XMD
C (I
L–
I R)
782780778776774Photon Energy ( eV)
0.8
0.4
0.0
-0.4
XMC
D (a
rb. u
nits
)
782780778776774Photon Energy (eV)
5.18.06 H=5T4.3K10K20K30K40K50K60K80K100K125K150K200K250K300K
40x10-3
30
20
10
0
XMD
C (I
L–
I R)
782780778776774Photon Energy ( eV)
0.8
0.4
0.0
-0.4
XMC
D (a
rb. u
nits
)
782780778776774Photon Energy (eV)
5.18.06 H=5T4.3K10K20K30K40K50K60K80K100K125K150K200K250K300K
40x10-3
30
20
10
0
XMD
C (I
L–
I R)
782780778776774Photon Energy ( eV)
40x10-3
30
20
10
0
XMD
C (I
L–
I R)
782780778776774Photon Energy ( eV)
0.8
0.4
0.0
-0.4
XMC
D (a
rb. u
nits
)
782780778776774Photon Energy (eV)
0.8
0.4
0.0
-0.4
XMC
D (a
rb. u
nits
)
782780778776774Photon Energy (eV)
5.18.06 H=5T4.3K10K20K30K40K50K60K80K100K125K150K200K250K300K
e-h
ITEY
H
MIFY e-h
ITEY
H
MIFY
At At remanenceremanence –– Co:ZnO/Co:ZnO/--AlAl22OO33(001)(001)0.65
0.60
0.55
0.50
0.45
0.40
0.35
XAS
(arb
. uni
ts)
800795790785780775770Photon Energy (eV)
10x10-3
8
6
4
2
0
XMC
D (arb. units)
T=50K H=0, TEYXAS -ve saturationXAS +ve saturation
XMCD diff
50x10-3
40
30
20
10
XA
S (a
rb. u
nits
)
800795790785780775770Photon Energy (eV)
10x10-3
8
6
4
2
0
XM
CD
(arb. units)
T=50K H=0, TFYXAS -ve saturationXAS +ve saturationXMCD diff
No hint of ferromagnetism associated with Co(II), even at 50K, in as-grown films
(insulating)
e-h
ITEY
H
MIFY
Can we make Can we make nn--Co:ZnOCo:ZnO without reducing without reducing structural structural Co(IICo(II)?)?
norm
aliz
ed a
bsor
ptio
n
773077207710x-ray energy (eV)
0.025Co + 0.975Co:ZnO0.050Co + 0.950Co:ZnO0.075Co + 0.925Co:ZnO0.100Co + 0.900Co:ZnO
norm
aliz
ed a
bsor
ptio
n
773077207710x-ray energy (eV)
0.025Co + 0.975Co:ZnO0.050Co + 0.950Co:ZnO0.075Co + 0.925Co:ZnO0.100Co + 0.900Co:ZnO0.150Co + 0.850Co:ZnO
Co K-edge XANES
norm
aliz
ed a
bsor
ptio
n
77807760774077207700x-ray energy (eV)
n-Co:ZnO (=1 m-cm)semi-insulating Co:ZnO
77167710
0.05 B/Co ~3% of Co is Co(0)
norm
aliz
ed a
bsor
ptio
n
776077407720x-ray energy (eV)
semi-insulating Co:ZnOCo metal
Our n-Co:ZnO has no detectable Co(0)
Does making the films n-type activate room temperature ferromagnetism?
Does making the films Does making the films nn--type activate room type activate room temperature ferromagnetism?temperature ferromagnetism?
Resistivity (-cm)Convntl. target Nanopart. targetProcessing condition
O2pressure
Substrate temp
Additional dopant
c-Al2O3 r-Al2O3 c-Al2O3 r-Al2O3
Deposition 10 mTorr 550°C --- 70000 95000 15000 1000
Anneal Vacuum 700°C --- 0.13 0.11 2.4 0.52
Deposition 10 mTorr 550°C 1% Al 0.4 0.18
Anneal Vacuum 700°C 1% Al 0.004
Deposition 2x10-5 Torr
(plasma) 550°C --- 0.15 0.54
Deposition Vacuum 400°C --- 7.9 0.025 0.053 0.011
Deposition Vacuum 400°C 1% Al 0.0014 0.0007
Kaspar et al., New J. Phys 10, 055010 (2008)
Structurally excellent n-type Co:ZnO is not made ferromagnetic at RT by adding carriers
Structurally excellent Structurally excellent nn--type type Co:ZnOCo:ZnO is is notnot made made ferromagnetic at RT by adding carriersferromagnetic at RT by adding carriers
-0.06
-0.04
-0.02
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
Mom
ent (
µ B/C
o)
-10000 -5000 0 5000 10000Field (Gauss)
as-grownCo0.1Zn0.9O
pure ZnO
n-type (Al)Co0.1Zn0.9Oas grown
annealn-type
Co0.1Zn0.9O
anneal again
anneal again!anneal again!!
(-cm)
>10,000
>10,000
0.4
0.1
0.02
0.01
0.004
H in planeT = 300K
Dependence of magnetization on conductivityDependence of magnetization on conductivity
0.06
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
0.00
Sat
urat
ion
mom
ent (
µ B/C
o)
10-3 10 -1 101 103 105
Resistivity ( -cm)
c - Co:ZnO
a - Co:ZnO
beforeanneal
afteranneal
]
]
Is Is nn--Co:ZnOCo:ZnO a a lowlow--TTcc DMS?DMS?
60
40
20
0
-20
-40
-60
Mom
ent ( e
mu)
-40 -20 0 20 40Magnetic Field (kOe)
5K300K
n-Co0.06Zn0.94O( = 1 m-cm)
-2
-1
0
1
2
Mom
ent ( e
mu)
-1000 -500 0 500 1000Magnetic Field (Oe)
n-Co0.06Zn0.94O( = 1 m-cm)2.5x10
-6
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
Mom
ent ( e
mu)
30025020015010050Temperature (K)
field cooled(in 4 T @ 10 mT)zero field cooled(in 0 T @ 4 mT)
nn--Co:ZnOCo:ZnO is paramagnetic at all temperaturesis paramagnetic at all temperatures
So much for Co....So much for Co....
Cobalt: Kobald (German), goblin or evil spirit, from cobalos (Greek)
Manganese: Magnes (Latin), magnet
what about what about MnMn??
Inte
nsity
(arb
. uni
ts)
191817161514 (degrees)
ZnO(002)
FWHM = 0.061°
-Al2O3(001)
Mn:ZnO(001)
Mn:ZnO(001)
Structure Structure –– MnMnxxZnZn11--xxO(001)/O(001)/--AlAl22OO33(001) (001)
Droubay et al., PRB 79, 155203 (2009)
Mn K-edge XANES
norm
aliz
ed a
bsor
ptio
n
658065706560655065406530
Photon Energy (eV)
MnMn charge state in Mn:ZnO/charge state in Mn:ZnO/--AlAl22OO33(001)(001)XX--ray absorption nearray absorption near--edge spectroscopy edge spectroscopy
(XANES)(XANES)
Mn metal
Mn(II)
Mn:ZnO film
nanoparticles
Mn3O4
Mn(IV)
Mn(III)
Mn(II)Mn(III)
Mn+???
1s Mn 3d (t2) + Mn 4p (t2) + O 2p
tetrahedral coordination
Pre-edge feature
e↑
Mn 3d + 4p + N 2pmajority spin 10Dq
t2↑
e↓
t2↓Mn 3d + 4p + N 2pminority spin 10Dq
Eexc
Mn 1s
First-principles XANES calculationsTitov et al. PRB 72, 115209 (2005)
XANES theoryXANES theory–– Mn(III)Mn(III)xxGa(III)Ga(III)11--xxNN
Two-peak pre-edge Mn(III)One-peak pre-edge Mn(II)
Mn K-edge XANES
norm
aliz
ed a
bsor
ptio
n
658065706560655065406530
Photon Energy (eV)
MnMn charge state charge state in Mn:ZnO/in Mn:ZnO/--AlAl22OO33(001)(001)XX--ray absorption nearray absorption near--edge spectroscopy edge spectroscopy
(XANES)(XANES)
Titov et al. PRB 72, 115209 (2005)
Mn metal
Mn(II)
Mn:ZnO film
nanoparticles
Mn3O4
Mn(IV)
Mn(III)
GaMnN (Mn3+)expt
ZnMnTe(Mn2+)calc
ZnMnTe(Mn2+) expt
1s Mn 3d (t2) + Mn 4p (t2) + O 2p
tetrahedral coordination
Mn(II) e↑
Mn 3d + 4p + N 2p10Dq
t2↑
e↓
t2↓Mn 3d + 4p + N 2p10Dq
Eexc
MnMn local structural environment local structural environment in Mn:ZnO/in Mn:ZnO/--AlAl22OO33(001)(001)Extended xExtended x--ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS)ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS)
Mn and Zn K-shell EXAFS
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
|(R
)|(Å-
3 )
86420
R (Å)
Mn:ZnO nano (Mn K)ZnO powder (Zn K)
Mn(II) substitutes for Zn
Mn:ZnO film (Mn K)
DopantDopant magnetic properties magnetic properties –– MnMn0.050.05ZnZn0.950.95OOXX--ray magnetic circular ray magnetic circular dichroismdichroism (XMCD)(XMCD)
e-h
ITEY
H
MIFY55x10-3
50
45
40
Flou
resc
ence
Yie
ld (a
rb. u
nits
)
640638636634632
Incident Photon Energy (eV)
8x10-3
6
4
2
0
-2
Mn
Dichroism
Mn L3 XASMn L3 XMCD
5K, 5T
MnMn LL33 XMCD XMCD -- MnMn0.050.05ZnZn0.950.95OO
35
e-h
ITEY
H
MIFY30x10-3
20
10
0Flou
resc
ence
Yie
ld (a
rb. u
nits
)
640638636634632
Incident Photon Energy (eV)
XAS(FY)
XMCD(FY)
B
T = 5K
Mn(II) is paramagnetic in as-grown films (highly resistive)
Field dependence of Field dependence of MnMn dichroismdichroism for for different different dopantdopant concentrationsconcentrations
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
Nor
mal
ized
Mn
XM
CD
/XA
S (a
rb. u
nits
)
543210
Magnetic Field (Tesla)
Mn0.002Zn0.998OMn0.025Zn0.975OMn0.05Zn0.95O
MC simulations
Lower rate of growth of dichroism with field reveals nonrandom dopant distribution (correlated substitution or spinoidal decomposition)
Presumed caused – lowering of total energy by closer proximity
MC simulations -- Droubay et al., PRB 79, 075324 (2009)
Does Does pp--type doping of type doping of Mn:ZnOMn:ZnO activate highactivate high--TTcc ferromagnetism?ferromagnetism?
Concentration calibration is tentativeAll films are highly resistive and paramagnetic
Secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) depth profiles
Growth in N2
0 100 200 300 400 500 60010-1100101102103104105106107
10181019102010211022102310241025NO
- ZnO-
Cal
ibra
ted
NO
-in
tens
ity (a
.u.)
Depth (nm)N
concentration (atoms/cm
3)
Growth in N2O
0 200 400 600 800 1000 120010-1100101102103104105106107
10181019102010211022102310241025NO
- ZnO-
Cal
ibra
ted
NO
-in
tens
ity (a
.u.)
Depth (nm)
N concentration (atom
s/cm3)
DopantDopant distributionsdistributionsAre bulk models correct for Are bulk models correct for nanoscalenanoscale materials?materials?
singles (n=1) dimers (n=2) open trimers (n=3) closed trimers (n=3)n-mers – a lattice cluster containing n dopants (n = 1, 2, 3,...)
cited 173 times
Monte Carlo simulations Monte Carlo simulations –– MMxxZnZn11--xxOO(M = generalized metal (M = generalized metal dopantdopant))
Wurtzite crystal size & dopant mole fraction (x) defined Dopants randomly placed at cation sites (consistent with x) Dopant “connectivity” through intervening oxygens examined and cataloged
throughout crystal Simulation done 1000 times for each crystal size and x value Statistics collected and analyzed
5 nm radius MxZn1-xO nanocrystal(~20,550 cation sites)
Dependence on S/V ratio for MDependence on S/V ratio for M0.090.09ZnZn0.910.91OO
0.318
singles
0.197
dimers
Higher fraction of singles and dimers as S/V ratio increases because of reduction in dopantcoordination number at the surface
Effect on magnetic properties of MEffect on magnetic properties of M0.100.10ZnZn0.900.90O O grown on grown on --AlAl22OO33(001)(001)
0.2 m
Mn:ZnO
Mn:ZnO
100 nm5 mMn:ZnO
-Al2O3(001)
0.2 m
Mn:ZnO
Mn:ZnO
100 nm5 mMn:ZnO
-Al2O3(001)
0.324Behringer’s eqns.
100 nm
7.5 nm
S/V = 5.4 x 10-2 Å-1
aZnO || asubcos30
OZnO
OAl2O3
a/a = +18%
aZnO || asubcos30
OZnO
OAl2O3
aZnO || asubcos30
OZnO
OAl2O3
a/a = +18%
assume
for even n-mers
assume
for even n-mers
0.367Monte Carlo
For isolated Mn(II), moment = 5.9 B (Kittel)MC 2.2 B & Behringer 1.9 B (~15% difference)
General result...General result...
xeff = 1 – [(1 – x)12 + 0.39(S/V)]1/12
For spherical nanoparticles, thin nanodisks, nanorods, and granular epitaxial films with S/V ≥~5 x 10-4 Å-1 and ~0.05 ≤ x ≤ ~0.15,
where xeff can be used in place of the actual x in bulk probabilistic formulae (bionomial thm or Behringer’s eqns).
Droubay et al., PRB 79, 075324 (2009)
SummarySummarySummary Must perfect the growth and do the right characterization to make defensible conclusions. Structurally excellent Co:ZnO & Mn:ZnO are highly resistive and paramagnetic as grown. Same is true for structurally excellent Co: and Cr:TiO2 with dispersed dopants. Paramagnetic Co spins + abundant itinerant electrons from AlZn and Ov ≠ ferromagnetism. Can’t grow p-Mn:ZnO by co-doping with N to see if hole-mediate exchange interaction is strong. Outlook for magnetically doped oxides?
Not high-Tc DMS as originally envisioned and predicted.Defect-mediated ferromagnetism can occur in poorly ordered materials (crummy films &nanoparticle assemblies).Is spinoidal decomposition the key to high-Tc DMS? Maybe – example Co:TiO2.
1 m
0.2 m
AFM MFM
1 m
0.2 m
1 m
0.2 m
1 m
0.2 m
AFM MFM
1 m
0.2 m
1 m
0.2 m
1 m
0.2 m
AFM MFM
1 m
0.2 m
1 m
0.2 m
1 m
0.2 m
1 m
0.2 m
AFM MFM
36% remanence
H || film plane --room temperature
H (Oe)
Mag
netiz
atio
n (x
10-6
emu)
1.2B per Co
36% remanence
H || film plane --room temperature
-40
-20
0
20
40
400020000-2000-4000H (Oe)
Mag
netiz
atio
n (x
10-6
emu)
1.2B per Co
36% remanence
H || film plane --room temperature
H (Oe)
Mag
netiz
atio
n (x
10-6
emu)
1.2B per Co
36% remanence
H || film plane --room temperature
-40
-20
0
20
40
400020000-2000-4000H (Oe)
Mag
netiz
atio
n (x
10-6
emu)
1.2B per Co
EXTRAS
1 m
0.2 m
AFM MFM
1 m
0.2 m
1 m
0.2 m
1 m
0.2 m
AFM MFM36% remanence
H || film plane --room temperature
H (Oe)
Mag
netiz
atio
n (x
10- 6
emu )
1.2B per Co
36% remanence
H || film plane --room temperature
-40
-20
0
20
40
400020000-2000-4000H (Oe)
Mag
netiz
atio
n (x
10- 6
emu )
1.2B per Co
photon energy (eV)810800790780770760
Co L-edgeXMCDALS B = -0.5T
B = +0.5T
Inte
nsity
(arb
. unt
is)
(I +-I
-)/(I +
+ I -)
(0.1
%)
Magnetic Field (KOe)
300K350K380K
Magnetic Field (KOe)
1.0
0.5
0.0
-0.5
80400-40-80
300K350K380K
300K300K350K380K
H(B
) – H
(0) (
m
-cm
)
Spinoidal decomposition in Co:TiO2/LAO(001)SpinoidalSpinoidal decomposition in Co:TiOdecomposition in Co:TiO22/LAO(001)/LAO(001)
Magnetic properties with & without surface CoxTi1-xO2 clusters
Magnetic properties with & without Magnetic properties with & without surface Cosurface CoxxTiTi11--xxOO22 clustersclusters
172Å Co0.04Ti0.96O1.96/LaAlO3(001)( = 0.35 -cm – Co-enriched CoxTi1-xO2-x clusters present)
222Å Co0.06Ti0.94O1.94/LaAlO3(001)( > 4 K-cm – flat film & distributed Co)
1.2 B/Co1.1 B/Co
Magnetic Field (Gauss)
Mag
netiz
atio
n (
Bpe
r Co)
-4000 0 4000
B || surface
Magnetic Field (Gauss)
Mag
netiz
atio
n (
emu)
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
-4000 0 4000
B || surface
Co K-edge x-ray absorption – Advanced Photon Source
Co speciation in CoCo speciation in CoxxTiTi11--xxOO22/LAO(001)/LAO(001)
Co(II) environment morelike CoTiO3 than CoO
No evidence for Co metal
No evidence for CoO
Co:TiO2 (no particles)Co:TiO2 (small particles)Co:TiO2 (small particles)CoTiO3 (powder)CoO (powder)Co (metal foil)
-20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50E – Eo (eV)
Eo = 7708.8 eV
Nor
mal
ized
abs
orpt
ion
(arb
. Uni
ts)
Co(IICo(II) local coordination ) local coordination ---- CoCoxxTiTi11--xxOO22/LAO(001)/LAO(001)
N = 5.82 (5.00) for randomly distributed (exactly correlated) O vacancies
Co(II) in slightly undercoordinatedoctahedral environmentCo(II) substitutes for Ti(IV)
RCo-O = 2.04 +/- 0.01 (2.01 +/- 0.01) Å in the ab plane (c direction) (1.94 & 1.97Å in pure anatase)
O vacancy forcesCo to be Co2+ CoxTi1-xO2-x
These oxygen vacancies are not electrically active
N = 5.4 +/- 0.3. N < 6 O vacancy (strain?)
Co K-shell EXAFS (APS)
s polarization
p polarization-1.5
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
-0.5
-1.0
12108642
k2*
(k)
k (Å-1)
s polarization
p polarization-1.5
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
-0.5
-1.0
12108642
)
-1)
-1.5
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
-0.5
-1.0
12108642
)
-
Semiconductor spintronicsSemiconductor Semiconductor spintronicsspintronics
carrier mediated exchange
diluted magnetic semiconductor (DMS)
sub. mag. dopant(Co, Fe, Ni, Cr, Mn)
ferromagneticn-semiconductor
quantum well structure
basesemiconductor
metal contact
metal contacte↑ h↑ + h↓
spin LED
“Is it possible to create magnetic semiconductors that work at room temperature?”Editorial Staff, Science 309, 82 (2005)
Tc ~ xNo( or )S(S + 1)(Ef)x = magnetic dopant mole fractionNo = cation density = s-d exchange parameter = p-d exchange parameterS = total valence spin on dopant(Ef) = density of free carriers at Ef
s
p
d
d
crystal momentumen
ergy
Previous work on Zn diffused Previous work on Zn diffused aa--CoCo0.090.09ZnZn0.910.91O/ O/ --AlAl22OO33(012) that we grew(012) that we grew……
Kittilstved et al., PRL 97, 037203 (2006)
Interstitial Zn (Zni) – a shallowdonor in ZnO
= 107 ~0.3 -cm[n] = ~2 x 1019 cm-3[Co(II)] = ~1021 cm-3
as growninsulating
x=0.09T = 300K
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
Sat
urat
ion
Mom
ent p
er C
o -
B
-2000 -1000 0 1000 2000Field [Oe]
+Zni
Zn diffused
Reversible chemical activation of FM & conductivityReversible chemical activation of FM & conductivity
Co:ZnOCo:ZnO + ZniCo:ZnO + Zni + O2
Abso
rban
ce LF
Co:ZnO
Zn vapor
Co:ZnO + Zni
O2
Co:ZnO + ZnO
, t
full recovery of Co(II)tet LFpeak manifold upon reoxidation
Highly correlated kineticsHighly correlated kineticsHighly correlated kinetics
power lawhopping conductivitypercolation theory
log() ~ n-1/3
Present problem – can’t reproduce the Zn diffusion process by Kittilstved:Similar magnetic behavior, but...Magnetization not “turned off” by heating in O2
Zn diffusion….. = 107 ~0.3 -cm[n] = ~2 x 1019 cm-3[Co(II)] = ~1021 cm-3
Zn diffusion….. = 107 ~0.3 -cm[n] = ~2 x 1019 cm-3[Co(II)] = ~1021 cm-3
Effect of Zn diffusion* on magnetizationEffect of Zn diffusion* on magnetization
-0.06
-0.04
-0.02
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
Mom
ent (
µB/C
o)
-10000 -5000 0 5000 10000Field (Gauss)
as-grown(insulating)
3100 Å a-Co0.1Zn0.9O / r -sapphire
Zn-diffused600°C, 5 hrs(0.03 ·cm)
*Following process by Kittilstved et al., Adv. Mater. 16, 2115 (2004)
Zn
insulatingCoxZn1-xO on
Al2O3(012)@ 600oC
sealed quartz tube
Discovery of trace amounts of Co(0) after Zn diffusionDiscovery of trace amounts of Co(0) after Zn diffusionDiscovery of trace amounts of Co(0) after Zn diffusion
0.05 B/Co ~3% of Co is Co(0)no
rmal
ized
abs
orpt
ion
773077207710x-ray energy (eV)
0.025Co + 0.975Co:ZnO0.050Co + 0.950Co:ZnO0.075Co + 0.925Co:ZnO0.100Co + 0.900Co:ZnO
norm
aliz
ed a
bsor
ptio
n
773077207710x-ray energy (eV)
0.025Co + 0.975Co:ZnO0.050Co + 0.950Co:ZnO0.075Co + 0.925Co:ZnO0.100Co + 0.900Co:ZnO
Zn diffused Co:ZnO0.150Co + 0.850Co:ZnO
Cobalt: Kobald (German), goblin or evil spirit, from cobalos (Greek)
-- poly ZnO*-- Co metal
glancing incidence XRD
Nor
mal
ized
inte
nsity
7760775077407730772077107700Energy (eV)
Co metal
310 nm a-Co:ZnO+ Zn diffusion
310 nm a-Co:ZnO
X-ray photoemission depth profilingXX--ray photoemission depth profilingray photoemission depth profiling
500 eV Ar+e-
770780790800810Binding Energy (eV)
Cycles 1-2
4
6
810
1214
Co0Co2+
interface
770780790800810Binding Energy (eV)
Cycles 1-2
4
6
810
1214
Co0Co2+
interface
0 5 10 15 200
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Sputter Depth (nm)
Ato
mic
Con
cent
ratio
n (%
)
Co 2p
Zn 2p3/2
O 1s
C 1 s
Al 2p
0 5 10 15 200
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Sputter Depth (nm)
Ato
mic
Con
cent
ratio
n (%
)
Co 2p
Zn 2p3/2
O 1s
C 1 s
Al 2p
45Å Co:ZnO/Al2O3(001) – as grown
Zn Zn indiffusionindiffusion –– does it reduce structural does it reduce structural Co(IICo(II)?)?
70Å Co:ZnO/Al2O3(001) -- Zn diffused
45Å Co:ZnO/Al2O3(001) – as grown
770780790800810Binding Energy (eV)
Cycles 1-2
4
6
810
1214
Co0Co2+
interface
770780790800810Binding Energy (eV)
Cycles 1-2
4
6
810
1214
Co0Co2+
interface
0 5 10 15 200
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Sputter Depth (nm)
Ato
mic
Con
cent
ratio
n (%
)
Co 2p
Zn 2p3/2
O 1s
C 1 s
Al 2p
0 5 10 15 200
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Sputter Depth (nm)
Ato
mic
Con
cent
ratio
n (%
)
Co 2p
Zn 2p3/2
O 1s
C 1 s
Al 2p
0 5 10 15 200
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Sputter Depth (nm)
Ato
mic
Con
cent
ratio
n (%
)
Co 2p
Zn 2p3/2
O 1s
C 1 s
Al 2p
0 5 10 15 200
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Sputter Depth (nm)
Ato
mic
Con
cent
ratio
n (%
)
Co 2p
Zn 2p3/2
O 1s
C 1 s
Al 2p
Co2+ Co0
770780790800810Binding Energy (eV)
Cycles 1-2
14
46
8
10
12
16
interface
Co2+ Co0
770780790800810Binding Energy (eV)
Cycles 1-2
14
46
8
10
12
16
Co2+ Co0
770780790800810Binding Energy (eV)
Cycles 1-2
14
46
8
10
12
16
770780790800810Binding Energy (eV)
Cycles 1-2
14
46
8
10
12
16
interface
775785795805815Binding Energy (eV)
Result from peak fitting: 36% Co(0)/64% Co(II)
775785795805815Binding Energy (eV)
Result from peak fitting: 36% Co(0)/64% Co(II)
Zn indiffusion – does it reduce structural Co(II)?Zn Zn indiffusionindiffusion –– does it reduce structural does it reduce structural Co(IICo(II)?)?
770780790800810Binding Energy (eV)
Co0Co2+
4
68
10
12
14-18}interface
770780790800810Binding Energy (eV)
Co0Co2+
4
68
10
12
14-18}interface
0 10 20 30 40 50 600
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Sputter Depth (nm)
Ato
mic
Con
cent
ratio
n (%
)
Co 2p
Zn 2p3/2
O 1s
C 1 s
Al 2p
O 1s
0 10 20 30 40 50 600
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Sputter Depth (nm)
Ato
mic
Con
cent
ratio
n (%
)
Co 2p
Zn 2p3/2
O 1s
C 1 s
Al 2p
O 1s
500Å Co:ZnO/Al2O3(001) – Zn diffused
Kaspar et al., PRB 77, 201303(R) (2008)
XANES and EXAFS, revisitedXANES and EXAFS, revisited
Co0.5Zn0.5 intermetallic-Mn structure Co-Zn long bonds are longer than for hcp Co metal (2.6Å in CoZn vs. 2.5Å in Co)
Co orders preferentially on c sites (x8)1/6 of Co also on d sites (x12)Co anisotropy possible if CoZn crystallites are oriented
Ferromagnetic at room temp0.8 – 1.2 B/CoTC ~ 400 – 450 K
Co - Mn?
310 nm a-Co0.1Zn0.9O
x nm a-Zni:Co0.1Zn0.9Ox = 310, 32, 7 nm
10
8
6
4
2
0
|(R
)| (Å
-3)
43210R (Å)
parallelpolarization
Co:ZnO Co:ZnO
CoZn
perpendicularpolarization
model – Co:ZnO+ CoZn(111)
singles
dimers
trimers
0 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20x
Predicted Predicted dopantdopant distributions distributions –– MMxxZnZn11--xxOO
singlesdimerstrimers
P(x) = Cxn(1 – x)kC, n, k – varied for best fit, but not equal to binomial theorem values
Fits –Gaussians
5 nm radius MxZn1-xO nanocrystal
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
P(x
,n)
0.200.150.100.050.00x
singles
dimers
trimers
binomial theorem
x = 0.09
Correcting for finite size effects in MCorrecting for finite size effects in MxxZnZn11--xxOO
100 nm
7.5 nm
S/V = 5.4 x 10-2 Å-1x = 0.01
x = 0.05
x = 0.10
log
of p
roba
bilit
y of
N-m
erfo
rmat
ion
Pro
babi
lity
109876543210
N-mer
M0.01Zn0.99O
M0.05Zn0.95O
M0.10Zn0.90O
prob
abilit
y of
N-m
erfo
rmat
ion
(offs
et fo
r cla
rity)
200
100
0
A
108642Dopant Concentration (%)
1.5
1.0
W
no = 0.57