Upload
mark-erwin
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
42S Proceedings of the NASS 26th Annual Meeting / The Spine Journal 11 (2011) 1S–173S
CONCLUSIONS: Discography is used extensively in the evaluation of
low back pain. Since the lifetime prevalence of disc degeneration and
low back pain is high (80% in the general population), many patients
may undergo this procedure. Data presented here showed that cells ex-
posed in vitro to a radiocontrast agent with adjustments for osmolality have
significantly reduced proliferation, increased cell death, and increased pro-
grammed cell death (apoptosis). In light of the well-recognized age- and
degeneration-related decrease in disc cell numbers, it is possible that radio-
contrast exposure may be contributing significantly to disc cell loss with
subsequent progression of disc degeneration. Findings presented here
provide a plausible cell-based explanation for the previously reported disc
degeneration in patients receiving discography contrast solutions.
FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS: This abstract does not discuss or include
any applicable devices or drugs.
doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.08.110
79. Intervertebral Disc-Derived Stem Cells: Implications for
Regenerative Medicine and Neural Repair
Mark Erwin, DC, PhD1, Michael Fehlings, MD, PhD, FRCSC2; 1Toronto,
ON, Canada; 2Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Neurological impairment due to spinal
cord or nerve root damage may occur acutely in the case of trauma, grad-
ually over time secondary to tumor growth or associated with advanced
degenerative changes in the spine such as is the case with DDD. The enor-
mous challenges posed by DDD and spinal nerve and spinal cord injury
(SCI) share a common thread: the loss of viable cells. Any biological agent
introduced as a therapeutic intervention would require sufficient numbers
of viable cells with functional receptors upon which to act. In order to sur-
mount these challenges there has been considerable interest in the develop-
ment of cell-based therapies for the treatment of disc disease, SCI and
nerve injury through which viable cells might be re-introduced to these tis-
sues in order effect repair. Stem cells have become an area of significant
interest with respect to possible cellular replacement strategies for neural
repair; specifically including stem cells that are capable of differentiating
into specific neural cells. With respect to potential repair strategies consid-
erable interest has been expressed over the past few years in the use of
human embryonic stem cells (hESC), adult human stem cells (aHSC)
and more recently induced pluripotential stem cells (iPS). However an im-
portant obstacle has been the proper choice of cells since some of them are
not readily available and transplants from other sources are plagued by
many problems including the ability of the cells to differentiate properly
and integrate into the spinal cord. Also, potential problems posed by the
use of induced pluripotential stem (iPS) cells including teratoma formation
of myc-containing iPS cells continue to raise significant concern about the
use of this source of cells. Some early attempts at tissue repair have been
attempted using murine ESCs and there are early clinical trials using hESC
cells for SCI. Here we demonstrate for the first time, that resident multi-
potent progenitor cells expressing classic ‘‘stemness’’ genes exist within
the NP ‘niche’ of the non-chondrodystrophic canine nucleus pulposus.
These nucleus pulposus progenitor cells (NPPCs) are multipotent cells that
can differentiate into multiple cell lineages in vitro such as adipocytes and
chondrocytic cells. We also demonstrate that NPPCs when injected into the
brain of the shiverer mouse (a compact myelin-deficient phenotype) also
form oligodendrocytes, neurons and astroglial cells and myelin basic
protein.
PURPOSE: To determine the differentiation capacity of non-chondrody-
strophic canine NPPCs in vitro, the in vivo capacity of NPPCs to differeni-
ate into various classes of neural cells.
STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: In vitro and and in vivo laboratory-based
study using acute non-chondrodystrophic canine lumbar spine interverte-
bral discs and new born shiverer mice.
PATIENT SAMPLE: No human patients, animal studies only as above.
OUTCOME MEASURES: Immunohistochemical analysis, qRT-PCR
gene expression analysis.
All referenced figures and tables will be available at the Annual Mee
METHODS: Dissection of non-chondrodystrophic canine lumbar inter-
vertebral discs, harvest of nucleus pulposus and expansion of multipotent
stem cells in suspension culture. In vitro differentiation into chondrogenic,
adipogenic, neurogenic and osteogenic pathways. In vivo transplantation
of GFP-transfected NPPCs into the brain of newborn shiverer mice fol-
lowed by sacrifice of the mice and 4% paraformaldehyde perfusion and im-
munohistochemical analysis of neural differentiation within the murine
brain.
RESULTS: Non-chondrodystrophic NPPCs are able to differentiate along
chondrogenic, adipogenic and neurogenic lineages in vitro but do not dem-
onstrate osteogenesis. NPPCs transplanted within the newborn shiverer
mouse brain demonstrate robust capacity to form neuron precursors (BIII
tubulin and NF200 staining), astroglial differentiation (GFAP staining) and
oligodendrocyte precursor formation (CNApase and myelin basic protein
staining). NPPCS demonstrate pluripotential genes CD133, Sox2, Oct3/
4, Nanog, NCAM and Nestin.
CONCLUSIONS: The canine intervertebral disc nucleus pulposus con-
tains cells that demonstrate multipotentcy and are capable of differentiat-
ing into chondrogenic, adipogenic and neurogenic lineage in vitro but fail
to differentiate along the osteogenic lineage. NPPCs injected into the brain
of the shiverer mouse are capable of differentiating into multiple neural
cell precursors indicative of neuron, astroglial and oligodendroctye pheno-
types with clear evidence of myelin formation. The results of this study
suggest that the intervertebral disc may be a source of multi-potent progen-
itor cells that could be useful in regenerative medicine and neural repair
applications.
FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS: This abstract does not discuss or include
any applicable devices or drugs.
doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.08.111
80. Early Postoperative Analgesic Effects of Single Epidural
Ropivacaine Injection Before Surgery in Posterior Lumbar Spinal
Fusion: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Song Kwang Sup, MD, PhD1, Jae Jun Yang, MD2; 1Chung-Ang University,
College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; 2Chung-Ang University Yong-
San Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Postoperative pain managements follow-
ing spine surgery have been the main concern. Despite ropivacain has
a suitable characteristics for preemptive epidural anesthesia, the clinical
trial has not yet been reported.
PURPOSE: To investigate the preemptive analgesic effects of single epi-
dural ropivacaine injection on the intensity of postoperative pain and re-
ducing of the parental opioid requirements following posterior one level
lumbar fusion surgery.
STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: A prospective, randomized, controlled
trial.
PATIENT SAMPLE: Inclusion criteria were a planned one-level posterior
lumbar interbody fusion with decompression for severe stenosis and/or
spondylolithesis accompanied by segmental instability. Excluded from
the study were patients who weighed less than 45 kg or more than
100 kg, had severe underlying respiratory, renal or hepatic disease, or
had allergy history to local anaesthetics.
OUTCOME MEASURES: Preoperative parameters: age, gender, Ameir-
can Society of Anethesiologists physical status, preoperative VAS for back
and Oswestry Disbility Index were recorded and duration of operation
from skin incision to closure. After surgery, VAS (0–10) and the frequency
at which patients pushed the button of PCA (FPB) and analgesic consump-
tions were assessed.
METHODS: From between August 2008 and June 2010, Patients in group
C (control group) did not received any medication and those in group I (in-
stillation group) received epidural injection of 0.1% ropivacaine 10 ml,
20 min before skin incision at planed operative spine level in double blined
manner. To measure pain intensity, VAS (0–10) at 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48 hr
ting and will be included with the post-meeting online content.