23
Internet Voting a menace to society? Jan Meijer

Internet Voting

  • Upload
    mari

  • View
    36

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Internet Voting. a menace to society? Jan Meijer. POWER. You exercise your right to vote. If you are elligable Anonymous In private, it’s YOUR vote, leave your consultant at home to elect well defined subject(s). According to a well defined process. Water boards & RIES. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Internet Voting

Internet Votinga menace to society?

Jan Meijer

Page 2: Internet Voting
Page 3: Internet Voting

POWER

Page 4: Internet Voting

You exercise your right to vote...• If you are elligable• Anonymous• In private, it’s YOUR vote, leave your

consultant at home• to elect well defined subject(s)

According to a well defined process

Page 5: Internet Voting

Water boards & RIES

• 2003, Water board Rijnland, Rijnland Internet Election System

• 1.2 million voters• 300k for Internet voting

Postal + Internet

Page 6: Internet Voting

RIES: The ”Robers” protocol

• Herman Robers. Electronic elections employing DES smartcards. Master's thesis, Delft University of Technology, December 1998. http://www.iscit.surfnet.nl/team/Herman/election.ps.

• http://www.cs.ru.nl/W.Pieters/compsac2005.pdf

• Virtual ballot using DES

Page 7: Internet Voting

3 phase system

• Phase 1: Prepare. – Distribute pseudo Id and voter secret to each

voter• Phase 2: Voting window• Phase 3: Tally

Page 8: Internet Voting

Network paradigmclient (voter) server (polling station)network (internet)process stage

vote process

processingverification

vote contact

vote materials

vote result

vote confirmation

unsecured

secured

Page 9: Internet Voting

Security is a mindset

Page 10: Internet Voting

Know your goal: won the battle..

Page 11: Internet Voting

Know your risks

Page 12: Internet Voting

shit will happen

Page 13: Internet Voting

Know when it’s good enough...

Page 14: Internet Voting

System characteristics

• Peak performance 2004: 23 voters/s over SSL• Holistic approach• Compartimentalized security• Layered security• Sustain multiple component failure• BCP, common sense• ”Lazy running”• Dirt cheap

Page 15: Internet Voting

Not in outer space

• You scavenge...• A network• Existing services (DNS, RPS, NTP, ...)• SURFnet-CERT• ...

Page 16: Internet Voting

Architecture overview

Page 17: Internet Voting

Our dashboard

Page 18: Internet Voting

It worked…Resource usageRijnland elections

Page 19: Internet Voting

No peak?

vote server 1, 2006 vote server 2, 2006

vote server 1, Dommelvote server 1, Rijnland

Page 20: Internet Voting

So, a menace to society?

ONLY IF DONE BADLY

Page 21: Internet Voting

Easiest to monitor

10.000 polling stations(Nigeria, UK, NL?)

or

1 station

Page 22: Internet Voting

/me?

• Voting by the people, for the people: it’s democracy stupid!

• Internet age opportunity• Publicly owned system, open source• End commercial incompetence• Power to the people!

State of our eVoting systems is a professional disgrace!

Page 23: Internet Voting

Still not convinced?http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/05/17/sarasota_county_network_breached/

“Slammer turns Florida election result into worm food”

…The county server was breached on the first day of early voting in the 2006 election, which included a now-disputed race for a seat in the US House of Representatives. The attack code was a variant of the infamous Slammer worm that penetrated the county's server, which unbelievably, was missing five years worth of security patches…