27
Internationalization of U.S. Doctorate Education John Bound University of Michigan and NBER Sarah Turner University of Virginia and NBER Patrick Walsh University of Michigan

Internationalization of U.S. Doctorate Education John Bound University of Michigan and NBER Sarah Turner University of Virginia and NBER Patrick Walsh

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Internationalization of U.S. Doctorate Education

John BoundUniversity of Michigan and NBER

Sarah TurnerUniversity of Virginia and NBER

Patrick WalshUniversity of Michigan

Research Question

• What explains the rise in the representation of foreign students among PhD recipients from U.S. universities?

• What determines the level and change in the distribution across countries in the number of U.S. doctorate recipients?

• What effect does the rise have on the U.S. and on foreign economies?

Empirical Starting Points[Overall]

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

40,000

45,000

1935 1945 1955 1965 1975 1985 1995 2005

Num

ber

of

PhD

s

Total

U.S.

Non-U.S.

Physical Sciences

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

8,000

1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000

Year of PhD

Num

ber

of D

egre

es A

war

ded

Non U.S.

U.S.

Total

Life Sciences

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

8,000

9,000

1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000

Year of PhD

Num

ber

of D

egre

es A

war

ded

Non U.S.

U.S.

Total

Engineering

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000

Year of PhD

Num

ber

of D

egre

es A

war

ded

Non U.S.

U.S.

Total

Economics

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000

Year of PhD

Num

ber

of D

egre

es A

war

ded

Non U.S.

U.S.

Total

Trends in funding for university science

0

2,000,000

4,000,000

6,000,000

8,000,000

10,000,000

12,000,000

14,000,000

16,000,000

18,000,000

20,000,000

1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005

Year

Fe

dera

l Fu

ndin

g to

Un

ive

rsiti

es (

000

s, 2

000

$)

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

9000

Num

ber

of P

hDs

HHS / HEW (pre 79)

NSF

Total

Physical Sciences, PhDs

Engineering, PhDs

Life Sciences, PhDs

Theoretical Motivation(Borrowing from Roy Model)

Home Country

Rec

ipie

nt

Co

un

try

(US

)

Cutoff for countries / periods with high fixed costs

Cutoff for countries / periods with low fixed costs of study abroad

Potential PhD students

Predictions from TheoryCross section• Who comes? Those with limited higher education systems will

be relatively likely to pursue graduate study at a U.S. university• Where do they go? Those with options relatively close to

those in the U.S. will be among those with admission offers from some of the best programs in the U.S.

Over time• Demand shocks. Changes in home country BA production

yield increases in doctorate attainment from U.S. universities.• Supply shocks. Funding shocks to the U.S. graduate education

market will yield relatively larger changes in PhDs awarded to those from countries where demand is relatively elastic.

• Networks matter.

EvidenceCross-Sectional BA and PhD Degrees

S&E BA/ PhD US/Pop 24, 1992 PhD US/BA PhD country

(1) (2) (3)North AmericaCanada 0.053 0.011 0.161United States 0.046 0.062 1.000

Western EuropeFrance 0.042 0.002 0.013Germany 0.050 0.002 0.022United Kingdom 0.056 0.003 0.022

AsiaChina 0.006 0.019 0.563South Korea 0.067 0.019 0.284Taiwan 0.059 0.045 0.666India 0.011 0.007 0.239

Representation of Doctorate Recipients at Top-5 Programs

(Physics)

0.06 0.060.07 0.07 0.07

0.06

0.10

0.15

0.28

0.31

0.12

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

0.35

Korea

India

Germ

any

Taiwan

Japa

n

China

Italy

USA

Franc

eUK

Canad

a

Sha

re o

f P

hDs

from

Top

5 P

rogr

ams

Representation of Doctorate Recipients at Top-5 Programs

(Economics)

0.050.05

0.06

0.08

0.170.17

0.26

0.280.29

0.31

0.14

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

0.35

Taiwan

India

Korea

China

USA

Japa

n

Germ

any

Italy

Canad

aUK

Franc

e

Sha

re o

f P

hDs

from

Top

5 P

rogr

ams

1980, Science & Engineering PhDs

USA71%

Canada1%

China0%

East Asia7%

East Europe0%

India4%

Soviet0%

Western Europe2%

Other15%

Foreign29%

1996, Science & Engineering PhDs

USA51%

Canada1%

China13%

East Asia9%

East Europe1%

India5%

Other16%

Soviet1%

Western Europe

3%

Foreign49%

Country-Specific Trends (Physical Sciences)

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005

PhD Year

De

gre

es

Aw

ard

ed

Physical Sciences, USA

Physical Sciences, Total (Index)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005

PhD Year

De

gre

es

Aw

ard

ed

Physical Sciences, Canada

Physical Sciences, Total (Index)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005

PhD Year

De

gre

es

Aw

ard

ed

Physical Sciences, Korea

Physical Sciences, Total (Index)

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005

PhD Year

De

gre

es

Aw

ard

ed

Physical Sciences, China

Physical Sciences, Total (Index)

Country-Specific Trends by Program Quality(Physics)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005

Year of PhD

Nu

mb

er o

f D

egre

es

Physics 1-5

Physics 6-25

Physics 26-50

Physics 50+

China

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005

Year of PhD

Nu

mb

er o

f D

egre

es

Physics 1-5

Physics 6-25

Physics 26-50

Physics 50+

Taiwan

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005

Year of PhD

Nu

mb

er o

f D

egre

es

Physics 1-5

Physics 6-25

Physics 26-50

Physics 50+

India

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005

Year of PhD

Nu

mb

er o

f D

egre

es

Physics 1-5

Physics 6-25

Physics 26-50

Physics 50+

Korea

Growth in undergraduate degree attainment

-0.1

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

1975 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995

BA Degree Year

d ln

BA

(1

975

ba

se)

USA

France

Germany

UK

Canada

-0.2

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

1975 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995

BA Degree Year

d ln

BA

(1

975

ba

se)

USA

India

Korea

Taiwan

Japan (2004 S-E Indicators)

Changes in BA Degrees and PhD Degrees Conferred from U.S. Institutions

Australia

JapanUK

USA

BrazilTaiwan

IrelandNorway

Egypt

Saudi ArabiaSwitzerlandGreece

Canada

Germany

India

Netherlands

Denmark

France

Singapore

ItalyMexico

New Zealand

Sweden

South Korea

Spain

Turkey

Belgium

Austria

Indonesia

-0.04

-0.02

0.00

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.10

0.12

0.14

0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14

Percentage Change in BA Degrees Awarded, 1975-1992

Pe

rce

nta

ge

Ch

an

ge

in P

hD

s (U

S),

19

82

-19

99

The China Case

0

50,000

100,000

150,000

200,000

250,000

300,000

350,000

400,000

1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000

BA Degree Year

Sci

en

ce a

nd

En

gin

ee

ring

BA

Deg

ree

s

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1980 1985 1990 1995 2000

PhD Year

Nu

mbe

r o

f P

hD

s (C

hin

a)

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

Nu

mbe

r o

fPh

DS

(U

S)

Physical Sciences China

Engineering China

Life Sciences China

Physical Sciences US

Engineering US

Life Sciences US

Understanding degree attainment among U.S. students

-

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

1957 1962 1967 1972 1977 1982 1987 1992

BA Year

Rat

io:

Ph

D /

BA

Engineering

Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Mathematics

Share of Growth in US PhDs by Source Country

N= % of total N= % of total Level (#) % of growthChina 23 0.2% 2,729 12.8% 2706 29.6%India 462 3.8% 1,254 5.9% 792 8.7%South Korea 149 1.2% 749 3.5% 600 6.6%Taiwan 554 4.6% 1,045 4.9% 491 5.4%

France 21 0.2% 65 0.3% 44 0.5%Germany 25 0.2% 159 0.7% 134 1.5%UK 60 0.5% 92 0.4% 32 0.4%

Canada 106 0.9% 228 1.1% 122 1.3%USA 8,588 70.8% 10,443 49.1% 1855 20.3%

Total 12,126 21,253 9127 100.0%

Share of Overall Growth1980 1996

Physics by program rank and year of graduate school entry

0

50

100

150

200

250

1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995

Year of Graduate School Entry

Nu

mb

er

of

Ph

Ds

Physics 1-5China Physics 1-5USA Physics 1-5

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995

Year of Graduate School Entry

Nu

mb

er

of

Ph

Ds

Physics 6-25

China Physics 6-25

USA Physics 6-25

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995

Year of Graduate School Entry

Nu

mb

er

of

Ph

Ds

Physics 26-50China Physics 26-50USA Physics 26-50

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995

Year of Graduate School Entry

Nu

mb

er

of

Ph

Ds

Physics 50+

China Physics 50+

USA Physics 50+

Average Annual IncreaseReal Earnings

CPSLife BA +

Interval Physics Sciences Economics 0-9 Yrs Exp

1958-1962 7.0% 6.4%

1964-1970 0.4% 2.2% 2.3% 2.7%

1973-1979 -1.7% -3.0% -2.6% -2.6%

1981-1987 1.8% 1.1% 1.8% 2.7%

1989-1995 -1.3% -0.6% -0.6% -0.2%

1997-2001 5.9% 5.1% 4.5% 2.8%

PhD-Level Scientists

Conclusion

• In the cross-section, representation and sorting by program quality varies with home country options; “selection” is greater when options are close to those in the U.S.

• “Demand side” changes generated by dramatic growth in undergraduate degree attainment in countries like China and South Korea and political developments in China and Eastern Europe can explain much – but not all -- of the rise in PhDs awarded to foreign students by U.S. institutions.

• Labor market and returns to science have not provided strong incentives for U.S. students to enter science and engineering.

Further Thoughts

• Simple economic factors can explain increased internationalization of doctoral education and the Science and Engineering workforce. If there are significant agglomeration effects, increased internationalization will increase TFP.

• Is the increased presence of foreigners in U.S. PhD programs and in the U.S. scientific workforce a good thing for the U.S.? The simple answer has to be yes. More research at lower prices.

• What about sending countries? While there is a discussion of “brain drain” in various foreign countries, there is some circulation of scientists back to their countries of origin. Indeed, some countries have policies that explicitly capitalize on this (e.g. Israel). Also, the presence of the U.S. market provides incentives for foreign students and for foreign systems of higher education.

• Are there losers? Yes. (1) U.S. students who might want to become scientists. (2) Possibly U.S. undergraduates with foreign TAs, in the absence of monitoring of communication skills.

Incentives from the labor market

25,000

35,000

45,000

55,000

65,000

75,000

85,000

95,000

1971 1976 1981 1986 1991 1996 2001

Year

Re

al E

arn

ing

s (2

00

0$

)

Mean

Median

25th Percentile

75th Percentile

Mean BA+ (Index=1973)

Physical Sciences

25,000

35,000

45,000

55,000

65,000

75,000

85,000

95,000

1971 1976 1981 1986 1991 1996 2001

Year

Re

al E

arn

ing

s (2

00

0$

)

Mean

Median

25th Percentile

75th Percentile

Mean BA+ (Index=1973)

Life Sciences

25,000

35,000

45,000

55,000

65,000

75,000

85,000

95,000

1971 1976 1981 1986 1991 1996 2001

Year

Rea

l Ear

ning

s (2

000$

)

Mean

Median

25th Percentile

75th Percentile

Mean BA+ (Index=1973)

Engineering

25,000

35,000

45,000

55,000

65,000

75,000

85,000

95,000

1971 1976 1981 1986 1991 1996 2001

Year

Rea

l Ear

ning

s (2

000$

)

MeanMedian25th Percentile75th PercentileMean BA+ (Index=1973)

Economics