Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Research Article Impact Factor: 4.226 ISSN: 2319-507X Bhat KA, IJPRET, 2014; Volume 2 (12): 71-84 IJPRET
Available Online at www.ijpret.com
71
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PURE AND APPLIED RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND
TECHNOLOGY A PATH FOR HORIZING YOUR INNOVATIVE WORK
FAILURE ANALYSIS AND OPTIMIZATION OF TRACTOR TROLLEY CHASSIS: AN
APPROACH USING FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS
BHAT KA1, UNTAWALE SP2, KATORE HV3
1. M Tech Student of CAD /CAM, Dept of Mechanical Engineering, D. M. I. E. T. R, Wardha,
India.
2. Principal, D. M. I. E. T. R, Wardha, India.
3. Assistant Professor, Dept of Mechanical Engineering, D. M. I. E. T. R, Wardha, India.
Accepted Date: 29/07/2014; Published Date: 01/08/2014
\
Abstract: This paper aims to redesign a modified chassis for tractor trolley. The existing
trolley chassis designed by industry uses ‘C’ Cross section having dimension 200mm x
75mm x 7mm and the material used is mild steel. By keeping the material and dimension
similar and using ‘I’ cross section area instead of ‘C’ resulted in more safer stresses than ‘C’
and 31.79kg reduction in weight. As raw material required is less, cost of chassis ultimately
reduces.
Keywords: Chassis design, Cad model, Stress Analysis, Optimisation.
Corresponding Author: MISS. KSHITIJA A. BHAT
Access Online On:
www.ijpret.com
How to Cite This Article:
Bhat KA, Untawale SP, Katore HV; IJPRET, 2014; Volume 2 (12): 71-84
PAPER-QR CODE
Research Article Impact Factor: 4.226 ISSN: 2319-507X Bhat KA, IJPRET, 2014; Volume 2 (12): 71-84 IJPRET
Available Online at www.ijpret.com
72
INTRODUCTION
A Chassis is one of the key components of tractor trolley. It consists of an internal framework
that supports the container of tractor trolley in its construction and use. It is a dead vehicle
which is connected to tractor trolley to carry the load. It serves as a frame work for supporting
the body. It should be rigid enough to withstand the shock, twist, and other stresses & its
principle function is to carry the maximum load for static and dynamic condition safely. An
important consideration in chassis design is to have adequate bending stiffness along with
strength for better handling characteristics. The Chassis is used to support the container on
which the load is to be carried out.
1.1 Functions of Chassis
To carry load of the goods carried in the body.
To withstand the forces caused due to the sudden braking or acceleration.
To withstand the stresses caused due to the bad road condition.
(a)
(b)
Figure 1.1: - A chassis of 6 tonne 2 wheeler trolley
Research Article Impact Factor: 4.226 ISSN: 2319-507X Bhat KA, IJPRET, 2014; Volume 2 (12): 71-84 IJPRET
Available Online at www.ijpret.com
73
Various components or products used in rural areas are mostly manufactured in small scale
industries such as farming machinery, thrashers, tractor trolleys etc. It has been observed that
these rural products are not properly designed. Tractor trolleys are manufactured in small to
moderate scale industries. Three dimensional finite element analyses of the chassis consist of a
computer model or design that is stressed and analyzed for specific results. A company that is
able to verify a proposed design will be able to perform to the clients specifications prior to
manufacturing or construction. The general purpose finite element analysis software ANSYS is
used for present study. The variation of bending stress and displacement values are predicted.
With the Indian market becoming global and advent of Multinationals in the market, a cut
throat competition has a rise between the Indian companies and the Multinational company,
thus to remain in the contest it has become necessary for the Indian industries to improve and
innovate their product. There are many chassis manufacturers in vidharbha region having good
Potential but poor productivity having a scope for improvement. Awachat industries Limited,
Wardha is one of the leading tractor trolley manufacturers in the region manufacturing 3000
trolley and above. Up to now they are manufacturing them without much economical and
technical consideration. One of the important areas where one can improve the product quality
while keeping the cost low is the design aspect. One can design the product in such a way that
its performance increases while the customer has to pay less as compared to the same product
of other companies.
1. SPECIFICATION OF 6 TONNE 2 WHEELER TRACTOR TROLLEY CHASSIS
The total capacity of the trolley is 60KN but the self weight of trolley and the other accessories
is 13 KN. So we consider the gross weight come over is 73 KN. The existing chassis consists of ‘C’
cross section having cross section area 200mm x 75mm x 7mm and the material used in
manufacturing is mild steel. The specification of tractor trolley is shown in table 1 which is
collected from industry itself. Considering uniformly distributed load on the chassis where Point
A is starting point of chassis, Point C is the contact Point from where the trolley box is to be
mounted, Point B is the centre Point of leaf spring and Point D is the end Point of the trolley.
Research Article Impact Factor: 4.226 ISSN: 2319-507X Bhat KA, IJPRET, 2014; Volume 2 (12): 71-84 IJPRET
Available Online at www.ijpret.com
74
Table1:- Specification of 6 tonne 2 Wheeler Tractor Trolley Chassis
General 6 Ton 2-Wheeler Box Type Trolley
Overall
Dimensions
Overall length 3100mm
(trolley box)
4025mm
(chassis )
Overall width 1900mm
(trolley box)
Overall height 730mm
(trolley box)
1700mm above ground
Load
capacity
Payload capacity 60KN
Unloaded weight
(chassis trolley box)
13KN
Gross load weight 73KN
Table2:- Structural Properties of Mild Steel
Structural Properties
Young's Modulus 210M Pa
Poisson's Ratio 0.3
Density 7840 kg/m³
Thermal Expansion 1.2e-005 1/°C
Research Article Impact Factor: 4.226 ISSN: 2319-507X Bhat KA, IJPRET, 2014; Volume 2 (12): 71-84 IJPRET
Available Online at www.ijpret.com
75
3. STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF CHASSIS
In the present study, market available tractor trolley Chassis is selected and its dimension is
noted. The Possible loads acting and the place of loads are noted. According to the dimensions,
tractor trolley Chassis is modeled using PRO E software. It is then imported to design modeler
software ANSYS.
Figure 3.1:- Cad Model of Chassis
Figure 3.2.:- Load diagram of chassis
Figure 3.3:- Reaction diagram of chassis
Research Article Impact Factor: 4.226 ISSN: 2319-507X Bhat KA, IJPRET, 2014; Volume 2 (12): 71-84 IJPRET
Available Online at www.ijpret.com
76
3.1 Calculation for Reactions
The chassis having the support at Point A and B, so reactions comes at Point A and Σ Fy =0
RA + RB = 102.20 +101.47 + 49.64
RA + RB = 253.31KN…………… (1)
Taking Moment At Point A
RB x 2.79= (49.64 x 3.13)+(101.47 x 2.095)+(102.20 x 0.7)
RB = 157.529KN…………………. (2)
From eqn (1)
RA = 95.781KN………………..…(3)
3.2 Calculations for Shear Forces acting on chassis:
SF at point D = 0KN
SF at D-B = -49.67KN
SF at B = -49.64+157.529 = +107.889KN
SF at B-C= 107.884-101.47= +6.419 KN
SF at C = + 6.419KN
SF at C-A = 6.419-102.20 = -95.781 KN
SF at A= -95.781+95.781= 0KN
3.2 Calculations for bending moments:
B.M at point D = 0 KN/m
B.M at point B = (-49.64 x 0.340) =-16.87760 KN/m
B.M at point C = (-49.64 x1.73) + (157.524 x1.390) – (101.47 x 0.695) = 62.5590 KN/m
B.M at point A = (-49.64 x3.13) + (157.524 x 2.79) – (101.47 x 2.095) –(102.20 x 0.7) = 0 KN/m
BMAX =(95.781x 1.3121) –(95.7833x0.655) =62.936 KN/m
Research Article Impact Factor: 4.226 ISSN: 2319-507X Bhat KA, IJPRET, 2014; Volume 2 (12): 71-84 IJPRET
Available Online at www.ijpret.com
77
4. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING ‘C’ CROSS SECTION CHASSIS USING ANSYS TOOL
The existing chassis geometry is generated in ANSYS workbench 11 by selecting toolbox where
various commands like draw, dimensioning, constraints, extrude, generate, rotate etc. are used.
Then mesh is generated on the model and after that load points are defined and load values are
given. Then the results are generated automatically for stresses and deformation in solution
phase. Figure shows the ANSYS results for Mesh Generated, Total Deformation, Equivalent (von
misses) Stress, Shear Stress, Normal Stress, Biaxiality Indication, Factor of Safety.
Figure 4.1:- Force Diagram
Figure 4.2: -Mesh Generated
Research Article Impact Factor: 4.226 ISSN: 2319-507X Bhat KA, IJPRET, 2014; Volume 2 (12): 71-84 IJPRET
Available Online at www.ijpret.com
78
Figure 4.3: -Von–mises stress
Figure 4.4:- Total Deformation
Figure 4.5: -Shear Stress
Research Article Impact Factor: 4.226 ISSN: 2319-507X Bhat KA, IJPRET, 2014; Volume 2 (12): 71-84 IJPRET
Available Online at www.ijpret.com
79
Figure 4.6: -Normal Stress
Figure 4.7 :- Biaxiality Indication
Figure 4.8 :- Factor of Safety
Research Article Impact Factor: 4.226 ISSN: 2319-507X Bhat KA, IJPRET, 2014; Volume 2 (12): 71-84 IJPRET
Available Online at www.ijpret.com
80
5. ANALYSIS OF MODIFIED ‘I’ CROSS SECTION CHASSIS USING ANSYS TOOL
Figure 5.1:- Force Diagram
Figure 5.2: -Mesh Generated
Figure 5.3: -Von–mises stress
Research Article Impact Factor: 4.226 ISSN: 2319-507X Bhat KA, IJPRET, 2014; Volume 2 (12): 71-84 IJPRET
Available Online at www.ijpret.com
81
Figure 5.4:- Total Deformation
Figure 5.5: -Shear Stress
Figure 5.6: -Normal Stress
Research Article Impact Factor: 4.226 ISSN: 2319-507X Bhat KA, IJPRET, 2014; Volume 2 (12): 71-84 IJPRET
Available Online at www.ijpret.com
82
Figure 5.7:- Biaxiality Indication
Figure 5.8 :- Factor of Safety
Table 3:- Comparision Between Existing Chassis And Proposed Chassis Using ANSYS
SR
NO.
FACTORS EXISTING ‘C’ SECTION SUGGESTED ‘I’ SECTION
1 Equivalent (Von-
Mises) Stress
75.452 MPa 34.648 MPa
2 Total Deformation 0.001877m 0.0002382 m
3 Shear Stress 20.875 MPa 7.5162 MPa
4 Normal Stress 40.409 MPa 13.088 MPa
5 Biaxiality Indication 0.98008 0.97657
6 Factor Of Safety 1.1424 to 5 2.4879 to 10
7 Mass 431.64 Kg 399.85 Kg
Research Article Impact Factor: 4.226 ISSN: 2319-507X Bhat KA, IJPRET, 2014; Volume 2 (12): 71-84 IJPRET
Available Online at www.ijpret.com
83
CONCLUSION
The newly designed ‘I’ section Chassis reduces 31.79 Kg of weight as compared to the
existing ‘C’ section Chassis.
More safer stresses are obtained in new suggested design.
Increase in Factor of Safety obtained in new suggested design.
Reduction in weight shows that raw material required for manufacturing of the Chassis is
reduced.
As raw material required is reduced, reduction in cost is achieved.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I express my deep sense of gratitude and Special thanks to Awchat Industries Pvt. Ltd., Wardha,
for giving me the required data.
REFERENCES
1. N. K. Ingole, D.V. Bhope “Stress Analysis Of Tractor Trailer Chassis For Self Weight Reduction”
International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology (IJEST), ISSN: 0975-5462 Vol. 3 No.
9 September 2011.
2. Hemant B.Patil, Sharad D.Kachave, Eknath R.Deore “Stress Analysis Of Automotive Chassis
With Various Thicknesses” IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering (IOSR-JMCE) e-
ISSN: 2278-1684 Volume 6 Issue 1 (Mar. - Apr. 2013), PP 44-49.
3. Abhishek Singh, Vishal Soni, Aditya Singh “Structural Analysis Of Ladder Chassis For Higher
Strength” International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering (ISSN 2250-
2459, ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal, Volume 4, Issue 2, February 2014).
4. Monika S. Agrawal, Md. Razik “Finite Element Analysis Of Truck Chassis” International journal
of engineering sciences & research Technology ISSN: 2277-9655.
5. Roslan Abd Rahman, Mohd Nasir Tamin, Ojo Kurdi “Stress Analysis Of Heavy Duty Truck
Chassis As A Preliminary Data For Its Fatigue Life Prediction Using Fem” Jurnal Mekanikal
December 2008, No. 26, 76 – 85.
Research Article Impact Factor: 4.226 ISSN: 2319-507X Bhat KA, IJPRET, 2014; Volume 2 (12): 71-84 IJPRET
Available Online at www.ijpret.com
84
6. Cicek Karaoglu, N. Sefa Kuralay “Stress Analysis Of A Truck Chassis With Riveted Joints‖”
Elsevier Science B.V Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 38 (2002) 1115–1130.
7. Mohd Azizi Muhammad Nora, Helmi Rashida, Wan Mohd Faizul Wan Mahyuddin “Stress
Analysis Of A Low Loader Chassis” Elsevier Ltd. Sci Verse Science Direct Procedia Engineering 41
(2012) 995 -1001.
8. N. R. Patil, Ravichandra R. Kulkarni, Bhushan R. Mane, Suhil H. Malve “Static Analysis Of Go-
Kart Chassis Frame By Analytical And Solid works Simulation” International Journal of Scientific
Engineering and Technology (ISSN: 2277-1581) Volume No.3 Issue No.5, pp : 661-663 1 May
2014.
9. Dr. R. Rajappan, M. Vivekanandhan “Static And Modal Analysis Of Chassis By Using Fea” The
International Journal Of Engineering And Science (Ijes) Volume 2 Issue 2 Pages 63-73 2013 Issn:
2319 – 1813 Isbn: 2319 – 1805.
10. Hemant B.Patil1, Sharad D. Kachave “Effects Of Web And Flange Thickness On Bending
Stiffness Of Chassis” International Journal Of Advance Research In Science And Engineering
http://www.ijarse.com IJARSE, Vol. No.2, Issue No.7, July, 2013 ISSN-2319-8354(E).
11. Jadav Chetan S., Panchal Khushbu C., Patel Fajalhusen “A Review of the Fatigue Analysis of
an Automobile Frames” International Journal of Advanced Computer Research (ISSN (print):
2249-7277 ISSN (online): 2277-7970) Volume-2 Number-4 Issue-6 December-2012.
12. S. P. Parelwar, Dr. D. V. Bhope, Dr. P. A. Potdukhe, “Stress Analysis of Compressed Air
Vehicle Chassis by Fem” International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology (IJEST).
13. Harish V. Katore, Prof Santosh B. Jaju, “Redesigning Of Tractor Trolley Axle Using Ansys”
International Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology(IJEST) ISSN:0975-5462 Volume No
3, 6 June 2011