Upload
ngomien
View
222
Download
4
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Research Article CODEN: IJPRNK Impact Factor: 5.567 ISSN: 2277-8713 Satyajit P. Sathe, IJPRBS, 2017; Volume 6(4): 93-118 IJPRBS
Available Online at www.ijprbs.com 93
METHOD DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION FOR THE SIMULTANEOUS
ESTIMATION OF PARACETAMOL AND EPERISONE HYDROCHLORIDE IN
PHARMACEUTICAL FORMULATION BY UV SPECTROSCOPIC METHOD”
MR. SATYAJIT P. SATHE1, DR. RAJSHEKAR M. CHIMKODE1, MRS. ARATI R. KAPASE1, MR.
AJINKYA B. CHAVAN1, MR. SACHIN R. PATIL2
1. Sant Gajanan Maharaj College of Pharmacy, Mahagaon.
2. Sant Gajanan Maharaj Rural Pharmacy College, Mahagaon.
Accepted Date: 16/07/2017; Published Date: 27/08/2017
Abstract: A new, straightforward, easy, exact, precise, reproducible and Cost effective simultaneous equation method was developed and validated for simultaneous estimation of Paracetamol and Eperisone Hydrochloride in pure and pharmaceutical dosage form. The method was based on the measurement of absorbance at two wavelengths 245 nm and 255 nm, 𝜆 max of Paracetamol and Eperisone Hydrochloride in Methanol correspondingly. Calibration curves of PAR and EPE were found to be linear in the concentration ranges of 2-20 𝜇g/mL respectively, with their correlation coefficient values (R2) 0.999. The Absorptivity values λ1 and λ2 were found to be 1111.88 and 254.11 for PAR and 265.96 and 1140.86 for EPE at 245.0 nm & 255.0 nm respectively. LOD and LOQ were 0.49𝜇g/mL & 0.14𝜇g/mL and 0.059𝜇g/mL & 0.18𝜇g/mL for Paracetamol at 245nm & 255 nm respectively. 0.075𝜇g/mL & 0.22 g/mL and 0.018𝜇g/mL & 0.054𝜇g/mL for Eperisone Hydrochloride at 245nm & 255 nm respectively. In the precision study, the % RSD value was found within limits (RSD < 2%).The percentage recovery at various concentration levels varied from 99.60 ± 16 for PAR and 99.51 ± 0.78 for EPE confirming that the projected method is accurate. It could be concluded from the results obtained in the present investigation that this method for simultaneous estimation of Paracetamol and Eperisone Hydrochloride was simple, accurate, exact, and Cost effective & successfully applied in pure and tablet dosage form.
Keywords: Paracetamol, Eperisone Hydrochloride, Simultaneous Equation Method, UV Spectrophotometric method, 𝜆 max, ICH.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF
PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND BIO-SCIENCE
PAPER-QR CODE
Corresponding Author: MR. SATYAJIT P. SATHE
Access Online On:
www.ijprbs.com
How to Cite This Article:
Satyajit P. Sathe, IJPRBS, 2017; Volume 6(4): 93-118
Research Article CODEN: IJPRNK Impact Factor: 5.567 ISSN: 2277-8713 Satyajit P. Sathe, IJPRBS, 2017; Volume 6(4): 93-118 IJPRBS
Available Online at www.ijprbs.com 94
INTRODUCTION
Introduction to UV Spectroscopy:
Spectroscopy is the study of the interaction between substance and energy of radiation.
Ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy UV refers to absorption spectroscopy or reflectance
spectroscopy in the ultraviolet-visible spectral region. In this region of UV the molecules
undergo electronic transitions under the influence of electromagnetic field. This method is
corresponding to fluorescence spectroscopy in that in which fluorescence observed due to
transitions of electron from the excited state to the ground state, while absorption measures
transitions from the ground state to the excited state.
The pharmaceuticals preparations are nothing but type of chemicals and therefore not an
exception from the use of UV Visible spectroscopy for their qualitative as well as quantitative
studies. The most pharmaceutical formulations contain drugs which is a combination of one or
more drug. Hence these combinations and their simultaneous determination is an significant
part of apprehension for a pharmaceutical analyst. Absorption of light by solution of drug is one
of the oldest and still become one of the most powerful and useful instrumental methods. The
wavelength of light absorb by drug to that compound will absorb its characteristic of its
chemical structure.
Specific regions of the electromagnetic spectrum are absorbed by exciting specific types of
molecular structure, its functional group, characteristics presence of covalent, double, triple
bond and atomic motion to higher energy levels. Absorption of microwave radiation is possible
because of excitation of rotational motion molecule. Absorption of visible and UV radiation is
linked with excitation of electrons, in atoms and in molecules, to high energy states. The
molecules containing conjugated electron in their outer shell light in the UV visible region is
sufficient. If the amount of conjugation increases, the spectrum shifts to lower energy because
absorption spectra are characteristic of molecular structure which can be used to qualitative
and quantitative identification of atomic and molecular species.
Principle:
The UV-Spectrophotometry consists of a light source is usually a hydrogen or deuterium lamp
and junction of source for UV measurements and a tungsten lamp for visible spectra
measurements. The wavelengths of continuous light sources are select with a wavelength
separator such as a Prism or Grating Monochromatic. Spectra are obtained by scanning the
wavelength Separator and Quantitative Measurements can be finished from a spectrum or at a
single and one assigned wavelength.
Research Article CODEN: IJPRNK Impact Factor: 5.567 ISSN: 2277-8713 Satyajit P. Sathe, IJPRBS, 2017; Volume 6(4): 93-118 IJPRBS
Available Online at www.ijprbs.com 95
The amount of light I, Transmitted through a solution of an absorbing chemical in a transparent
solvent can be related to its concentration by Beers Law:
-log I/I0 = A = ελbc……… (1.1)
Where,
I0 = the incident light intensity.
A = the absorbance (also referred to as the optical density)
b = the cell path length in cm
C = Concentration of solution in moles/liter and
ελ = is the molar absorptivity.
Schematic Diagram of Double Beam UV-VIS Spectrophotometer
The spectrophotometric assay of drugs infrequently involves the measurement of absorbance
of samples containing only one absorbing component. The pharmaceutical analyst most
commonly faces the state of affairs where the concentration of one or more substances is
requisite in samples which potentially interfere in the assay.
All the spectrophotometric techniques for single or multicomponent mixture of drug samples is
the property that at all wavelengths:
The absorbance of a solution = Sum of absorbance of the individual components
Research Article CODEN: IJPRNK Impact Factor: 5.567 ISSN: 2277-8713 Satyajit P. Sathe, IJPRBS, 2017; Volume 6(4): 93-118 IJPRBS
Available Online at www.ijprbs.com 96
Or
The measured absorbance is the difference between the total absorbance of the
solution in the sample cell and that of the solution in the reference cell.
There are various spectrophotometric methods are accessible which can be used for the
analysis of single or multi combination of samples. Following methods can be used:
Simultaneous Equation Method
Derivative Spectroscopic Method
Dual Wavelength Method
Absorbance Ratio Method (Q-Absorption Method)
Area Under Curve Method
Difference Spectroscopic Method
Simultaneous equations method
If a sample contains two soluble drugs (X and Y) one of them which absorbs at the λmax of the
other (as shown in figure λ1and λ2), it may be possible to determine both drugs by simultaneous
equation.
In this method, the absorbances of the solutions are measured at the λmax of both the drugs.
The criteria are that the ratios [(A2/A1) / (ax2/ax1)] and [(ay2/ay1) / (A2/A1)] should lie outside the
range 0.1-2.0 Concentration of both drugs is calculated by solving the simultaneous equations 1
& 2.
Cx = (A2 aY1 – A1 aY2) / (aY1 aX2 - aY2 aX1) ----- (1.2)
Cy = (A1 aX2 - A2 aX1) / (aY1 aX2 - aY2 aX1) ------ (1.3)
Where,
A1, A2= Absorbances of mixture at λ1 & λ2 respectively,
ax1 = Absorpitivity of first drug at λ1,
ax2 = Absorpitivity of first drug at λ2,
ay1 = Absorpitivity of second drug at λ1,
Research Article CODEN: IJPRNK Impact Factor: 5.567 ISSN: 2277-8713 Satyajit P. Sathe, IJPRBS, 2017; Volume 6(4): 93-118 IJPRBS
Available Online at www.ijprbs.com 97
ay2 = Absorpitivity of second drug at λ2.
Overlain UV absorption spectra of two drugs
Introduction to Text & Methodology of validation of analytical procedures:
ICH had provide the guideline for validation of analytical procedure under the title of
“Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text & Methodology” in the section Q2B (R1). This
document provides the characteristics for consideration of validation of the analytical
procedures. The aim of validation of an analytical measure is to make obvious that it is
appropriate for its planned purpose.
The four most common types of analytical procedures:
Identification test
Quantitative tests for impurity
Limit test for the control of impurity
Quantitative tests of the API in samples
Research Article CODEN: IJPRNK Impact Factor: 5.567 ISSN: 2277-8713 Satyajit P. Sathe, IJPRBS, 2017; Volume 6(4): 93-118 IJPRBS
Available Online at www.ijprbs.com 98
Method and Validation Parameters as per ICH and USP.
Treatment of muscle spasm
Mechanism of Action
Chemical Class Example
Peripherally acting Muscle Relaxant
Depolarizing agent Curare alkaloids Tubocurarine, Dimethyltubocurarine
Non Depolarizing agent
4-Ammonium agents Atracurium, Cisatracurium, Gallamine
ACH Release Inhibitor
Choline derivative Succinylcholine
Centrally acting Muscle Relaxant
Carbamic esters Meprobamate, Methocarbamol, Tybamate
Benzodiazepines Diazepam, Lorazepam, Nitrazepam
Anticholinergics Orphenadrine
Method
Validation
Precision
Accuracy
Limit of Detection
Limit of Quantification
Specificity
Linearity
Robustness
Ruggedness
Research Article CODEN: IJPRNK Impact Factor: 5.567 ISSN: 2277-8713 Satyajit P. Sathe, IJPRBS, 2017; Volume 6(4): 93-118 IJPRBS
Available Online at www.ijprbs.com 99
Piperidine derivative
Eperisone, Tolperisone
Others Thiocolchicoside, Quinine, Baclofen
Directly acting Muscle Relaxant
Dantrolene
Analgesics Pyroxicam, Lornoxicam, Diclofenac, Aceclofenac, Ibuprofen
DRUG PROFILE
Drug Profile of Paracetamol:
Structure of Paracetamol
IUPAC Name: N-(4-hydroxyphenyl) ethanamide or N-(4-hydroxyphenyl) acetamide
Molecular Formula: C8H9NO2 or HOC6H4NHCOCH3
Molecular Mass: 151.163 g/mol
Physical Properties: [48]
Nature: Colorless Crystalline Powder.
Odour : Odorless
Taste: Bitter Taste
Solubility:
Very slightly soluble in cold water,
Research Article CODEN: IJPRNK Impact Factor: 5.567 ISSN: 2277-8713 Satyajit P. Sathe, IJPRBS, 2017; Volume 6(4): 93-118 IJPRBS
Available Online at www.ijprbs.com 100
Soluble in boiling water, Freely soluble in alcohol;
Slightly soluble in ether; Soluble in Methanol, Ethanol, Diethyl formamide, Ethylene
dichloride, Acetone, ethyl acetate.
Slightly soluble in Ether.
Practically insoluble in petroleum ether, pentane, benzene.
Melting point: 1690C
Boiling Point: 4200C
Mechanism of Action:
The mechanism of action of Paracetamol which is not completely understands by scientist. As
like NSAID’s does inhibit cyclooxygenase (COX) enzyme outside the CNS.
Basically paracetamol is act in the CNS by increasing the pain threshold by inhibiting both
different forms of cyclooxygenase enzyme COX-1, COX-2, and COX-3 involved in prostaglandin
(PG) synthesis. Paracetamol indirectly block the action of COX and this blockage is unsuccessful
in the occurrence of peroxide.
The antipyretic action of paracetamol is produced due to direct effect on the heat regulating
center of the hypothalamus below the pituitary gland.
The analgesic effect is produced by inhibitory action on spinal nitric oxide and serotonin
pathways. Its action is also produced by blocking nerve endings. [49]
Pharmacodynamics of Paracetamol:
Paracetamol is a synthetic drug which is commonly used as analgesic and antipyretic. It has
same therapeutic effect as that of salicylates. Paracetamol is a NSAID drug with powerful
antipyretic and analgesic activity with low anti-inflammatory action. When it is taken orally it
reduces level of prostaglandin. [50]
Pharmacokinetics of Paracetamol:
Pharmacokinetics of Paracetamol.
Sr. No. Pharmacokinetic parameter Normal values
1 Absorption In duodenum non ionized form
Research Article CODEN: IJPRNK Impact Factor: 5.567 ISSN: 2277-8713 Satyajit P. Sathe, IJPRBS, 2017; Volume 6(4): 93-118 IJPRBS
Available Online at www.ijprbs.com 101
2 Distribution ratio 50 L
3 Metabolism site Liver
4 Elimination 0.24 – 0.98
5 Bioavailability of drug 60-70% (Dose dependable)
6 Half-life of the drugs 1-3 hrs
7 Excretion Renal Excretion
Drug Profile of Eperisone Hydrochloride:
Structure of Eperisone Hydrochloride.
IUPAC Name: (2RS)-1-(4-ehtylphenyl-2-methyl-3-(1-piperidyl) propan-1-one
Molecular Formula: C17H25NO
Molecular Mass: 259.387 g/mol
Physical Properties: [51]
Nature: White solid
Solubility: Methanol
Melting point: 170-1720C
Research Article CODEN: IJPRNK Impact Factor: 5.567 ISSN: 2277-8713 Satyajit P. Sathe, IJPRBS, 2017; Volume 6(4): 93-118 IJPRBS
Available Online at www.ijprbs.com 102
Action: Eperisone is an Antispasmodic drug which relaxes both skeletal muscles and
vascular smooth muscles, and demonstrates a variety of effects such as reduction of
myotonia, improvement of circulation, and suppression of the pain reflex.
Mechanism of Action:
Eperisone produces its action at the level of spinal cord. It blocks sodium and calcium channels.
Eperisone exerts its spinal reflex inhibitory action mostly via a pre synaptic inhibition of
the transmitter release. It starts from the major afferent endings by combined action on
voltage-gated sodium and calcium channels; Eperisone increases the blood supply towards
skeletal stimulation which produces its local anesthetic effect. Eperisone produces muscle
relaxation by acting on CNS.
Pharmacokinetics of Eperisone hydrochloride:
Pharmacokinetics of Eperisone hydrochloride.
Sr. No. Pharmacokinetic parameter Normal values
1 Absorption At Muscle
2 Distribution ratio 3 L/Kg
3 Metabolism site Liver
4 Elimination 0.33-0.69
5 Bioavailability of drug 77%
6 Half-life of the drugs 1.6 - 1.8 hr.
7 Excretion Renal Excretion
List of the Marketed Formulations:
List of the Marketed Formulations
Brand Name Formulation Composition Company
Enzoril Tablet Eperisone 50 mg Alkem Labs
Myosone Tablet Eperisone 50 mg Macleods
Research Article CODEN: IJPRNK Impact Factor: 5.567 ISSN: 2277-8713 Satyajit P. Sathe, IJPRBS, 2017; Volume 6(4): 93-118 IJPRBS
Available Online at www.ijprbs.com 103
Rapisoine SR Tablet Eperisone 50 mg Abbot
Skelact Tablet Eperisone 50 mg Sun Pharma
Eprisan Tablet Eperisone 50 mg Unichem
Myosone Plus Tablet Eperisone 50 mg + Paracetamol 325 mg
Macleods
MATERIAL & METHODS
Material:
Reagents and materials
Paracetamol (PAR) kindly supplied as a gift samples from Centaur Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd.,
Tivim Industrial Estate, Karaswada, Mhapusa, Goa- 403426, India.
Eperisone (EPE) kindly supplied as a gift samples from Abbot India Ltd., L-18, Verna
Industrial Area, Verna Salcette, Goa- 403722, India.
Methanol AR grade as solvent (Lobal Chemie, Boisar, Palghar, Mumbai, India.)
Apparatus used
A double beam UV-visible Spectrophotometer (Agilent, Carry UV-60, Japan), attached to a
computer software UV probe 2.0, with a spectral width of 2 nm, wavelength accuracy of 0.5
nm and pair of 1 cm matched quartz cells.
Analytical balance (Adarsh, Ambala Cantt.)
Corning volumetric flasks, amber coloured volumetric flasks and pipettes of borosilicate
glass were used in the study.
Preparation of solutions
Preparation of standard stock solution
An accurately weighed PAR and EPE powder (10 mg) were transferred to 100 ml separate
volumetric flasks and dissolved in methanol. The flasks were shaken and volumes were made
up to mark with methanol to give a solution having concentration 100 μg/ml for both of drugs. [40]
Research Article CODEN: IJPRNK Impact Factor: 5.567 ISSN: 2277-8713 Satyajit P. Sathe, IJPRBS, 2017; Volume 6(4): 93-118 IJPRBS
Available Online at www.ijprbs.com 104
Preparation of Sample Solution
Twenty tablets were weighed accurately and powdered. Quantity of the powder equivalent to
0.010 mg PAR & 0.010 mg EPE was transferred in 100 ml volumetric flask separately and
powder was dissolved in 10 ml of methanol with shaking having slight warming temperature to
dissolve drug as completely as possible. Then the volume was adjusted up to mark with
methanol. 1 ml PAR & 1 ml of EPE was taken in 10 ml volumetric flask from the stock solution.
This procedure was again repeated for third time & the volume was adjusted up to the mark
with methanol to get a final concentration of PAR (10 μg/ml) and EPE (10 μg/ml). [40]
Methods
Determination of wavelength
In simultaneous equation method the absorbance of the both drug solutions are measured at
the absorption maxima for determination of λ max of both the drugs. Standard solutions of
both the drugs were scanned in the range of 200 – 400 nm. From the overlay spectra of two
drugs, the absorption maxima (λ max) were selected. [5]
Method Validation
Linearity
Experimental Procedure for Linearity and range:
Calibration curve were plotted over a concentration range of 2-20 μg/ml for PAR and EPE
individually. Accurately measured standard working solution of PAR (0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0,
1.2, 1.4, 1.6, 1.8, 2.0 ml) and EPE (0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0, 1.2, 1.4, 1.6, 1.8, 2.0 ml) was
pipette out in to a separate series of 10 ml volumetric flask. The volume was adjusted to the
mark with methanol and the absorbance of the solutions was measured at 245.0 nm (λ max of
PAR) and 255.0 nm (λ max of EPE) against methanol as a blank. The calibration curve was
constructed by plotting absorbance Vs concentration.
Precision
Method precision (Repeatability)\
The precision of the method was checked by repeated scanning and measurement of
absorbance of solutions (n = 6) for PAR (10 μg/ml) and EPE (10 μg/ml) without changing the
parameter of the proposed Spectrophotometric method. The results are reported in terms of
relative standard deviation (% RSD)
Research Article CODEN: IJPRNK Impact Factor: 5.567 ISSN: 2277-8713 Satyajit P. Sathe, IJPRBS, 2017; Volume 6(4): 93-118 IJPRBS
Available Online at www.ijprbs.com 105
Intermediate precision (Reproducibility)
The intraday and interday precision of the proposed method was determined by analyzing the
corresponding responses 6 times on the same day and on 3 different days over a period of 1
week for concentrations of standard solutions of PAR and EPE (10 μg/ml for each). The result
was reported in terms of relative standard deviation (% RSD).
Limit of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ)
The limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) of the method were calculated by
using the following equations.
LOD = 3.3 X σ/S
LOQ = 10 X σ/S
Where, σ = the standard deviation of the response
S = slope of the calibration curve
Accuracy (% Recovery study)
Procedure:
The accuracy of the method was determined by calculating recoveries of PAR and EPE by the
standard addition method. Known amounts of standard solution of PAR and EPE were added at
50 %, 100 % and 150 % levels to pre quantified sample solutions of PAR and EPE. [40]
Determination of Absorbtivity Value
The Absorbtivity value of PAR and EPE at 245.0 nm & 255.0 nm respectively from each solution
was calculated using the following formula and the results were shown in table 8.1 & 8.2
Absorbtivity = Absorbance/ Concentration (gm/ 100 ml)
Determination of Ruggedness:-
Procedure:
The ruggedness of proposed method was evaluated by applying the developed procedures to
assay of 10 μg/ml of PAR & EPE at both 245.0 nm & 255.0 nm using the same instrument by two
different analysts under the same optimized conditions at different days. The obtained results
were found to be reproducible, since there was no significance difference between analysts.
Research Article CODEN: IJPRNK Impact Factor: 5.567 ISSN: 2277-8713 Satyajit P. Sathe, IJPRBS, 2017; Volume 6(4): 93-118 IJPRBS
Available Online at www.ijprbs.com 106
Thus the proposed methods could be considered rugged. The results were shown in
table……………….
Where, N = Slandered deviation of the reponce.
S = Slope of the corresponding calibration curve.
Analysis of Drugs in Tablet Dosage Form
Twenty tablets were weighed and powdered. A powder quantity equivalent to 10 mg PAR and
10 mg EPE was accurately weighed and transferred to volumetric flask of 10 ml capacity. 10 ml
of methanol was transferred to this volumetric flask. The solution was filtered through
whatman filter paper. From this solution 01 ml was transferred to volumetric flask of 10 ml
capacity and Volume was made up to the mark to give 100 μg/ml PAR and EPE. From this
solution 01 ml was transferred to volumetric flask of 10 ml capacity and Volume was made up
to the mark to give a solution containing 10 μg/ml of PAR and EPE. The resulting solution was
analysed by proposed methods. The absorbance of sample solution was measured against
methanol as blank at 245.0 and 255.0 nm for quantification of PAR and EPE. The amount of PAR
and EPE present in the sample solutions were determined by solving the equation 1 and 2
(shown in later section).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Method Development:
In this method, the absorbances of the solutions were measured at the λ max of both the drugs.
The criteria are that the ratios [(A2/A1) / (ax2/ax1)] and [(ay2/ay1) / (A2/A1)] should lie outside the
range 0.1 to 2.0.
For this measurement, the standard solutions of PAR and EPE (100 μg/ml) were scanned
separately in the range of 200-400 nm against ethanol as a blank. Data were recorded at an
interval of 1 nm.
The absorbance and absorptivity values at the particular wavelengths were calculated and
substituted in the following equation to obtain the concentration
Cx = (A2 Ay1 – A1 Ay2) / (Ay1 Ax2 – Ay2 Ax1) ----- (8.1)
Cy = (A1 Ax2 – A2 Ax1) / (Ay1 Ax2 – Ay2 Ax1) ------ (8.2)
Where, A1, A2 = Absorbances of mixture at λ1 & λ2 respectively,
ax1 = Absorpitivity of PAR at 245.0 nm
Research Article CODEN: IJPRNK Impact Factor: 5.567 ISSN: 2277-8713 Satyajit P. Sathe, IJPRBS, 2017; Volume 6(4): 93-118 IJPRBS
Available Online at www.ijprbs.com 107
ax2 = Absorpitivity of PAR at 255.0 nm
ay1= Absorpitivity of EPE at 245.0 nm
ay2 = Absorpitivity of EPE at 255.0 nm.
Table No. 8.1 & Table No. 8.2 indicates the absorptivity value for PAR & EPE for both
wavelengths respectively.
Absorption Spectra of Paracetamol (100 μg/ml each) in Methanol at 245.0 nm
λ max at 245 nm for PAR
Research Article CODEN: IJPRNK Impact Factor: 5.567 ISSN: 2277-8713 Satyajit P. Sathe, IJPRBS, 2017; Volume 6(4): 93-118 IJPRBS
Available Online at www.ijprbs.com 108
Absorption Spectra of Eperisone hydrochloride (100 μg/ml each) in Methanol at 255.0 nm
Overlain Absorption Spectra of Paracetamol & Eperisone hydrochloride (100 μg/ml each) in
Methanol at 245.0 nm & 255.0 nm respectively.
λ max at 255 nm for
EPE
λ max at 245 nm for PAR
λ max at 255 nm for
EPE
Research Article CODEN: IJPRNK Impact Factor: 5.567 ISSN: 2277-8713 Satyajit P. Sathe, IJPRBS, 2017; Volume 6(4): 93-118 IJPRBS
Available Online at www.ijprbs.com 109
Absorbtivity Values for Paracetamol:
The Absorptivity values λ1 and λ2 were found to be 1111.88 and 254.11 for Paracetamol at
245.0 nm & 255.0 nm respectively.
Absorbtivity Values for Eperisone hydrochloride: The Absorptivity values λ1 and λ2 were found
to be 265.96 and 1140.86 for Eperisone hydrochloride at 245.0 nm & 255.0 nm respectively.
Method validation
Linearit: Calibration range was observed in the concentration range of 2-20 μg/ml for PAR and
EPE each. The calibration curves at different wavelengths are shown in Figure. 8.4, 8.5, 8.6 &
8.7.
Calibration Curve of Paracetamol at 245.0 nm in Methanol.
y = 0.1115x - 0.0038R² = 0.9999
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
0 5 10 15 20 25
Ab
sorb
an
ce
Concentration
Series1
Linear (Series1)
Research Article CODEN: IJPRNK Impact Factor: 5.567 ISSN: 2277-8713 Satyajit P. Sathe, IJPRBS, 2017; Volume 6(4): 93-118 IJPRBS
Available Online at www.ijprbs.com 110
Calibration Curve of Paracetamol at 255.0 nm in Methanol.
Calibration Curve of Eperisone hydrochloride at 245.0 nm in Methanol.
y = 0.025x + 0.0041R² = 0.998
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0 5 10 15 20 25
Ab
sorb
an
ce
Concentration
Series1
Linear (Series1)
y = 0.026x + 0.0062R² = 0.997
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0 5 10 15 20 25
Ab
sorb
an
ce
Concentration
Series1
Linear (Series1)
Research Article CODEN: IJPRNK Impact Factor: 5.567 ISSN: 2277-8713 Satyajit P. Sathe, IJPRBS, 2017; Volume 6(4): 93-118 IJPRBS
Available Online at www.ijprbs.com 111
Calibration Curve of Eperisone hydrochloride at 255.0 nm in Methanol.
Precision
Method precision (Repeatability)
The % RSD values of PAR and EPE were found to be 0.046 % and 0.21 % respectively at 245.0
nm. The % RSD value of PAR and EPE were found to be 0.24 % and 0.044 % at 255.0 nm. Low
value of % RSD indicates that proposed method is repeatable.
Intermediate precision (Reproducibility)
The SD & % RSD values of PAR for inter-day were (0.00026 – 0.023 %) and intra-day (0.0011 –
0.10 %) at 245.0 nm.
The SD & % RSD values of PAR for inter-day were (0.00051 – 0.21 %) and intra-day (0.00054 –
0.47 %) at 255.0 nm.
The SD & % RSD values of EPE for inter-day were (0.00042 – 0.16 %) and intra-day were (0.0011
– 0.45 %) at 245.0 nm.
The SD & % RSD values for inter-day were (0.00062 - 0.053 %) and intra- ay were (0.00054 -
0.47 %) at 255.0 nm.
y = 0.1181x - 0.0255R² = 0.9985
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
0 5 10 15 20 25
Ab
sorb
an
ce
Concetration
Series1
Linear (Series1)
Research Article CODEN: IJPRNK Impact Factor: 5.567 ISSN: 2277-8713 Satyajit P. Sathe, IJPRBS, 2017; Volume 6(4): 93-118 IJPRBS
Available Online at www.ijprbs.com 112
LOD and LOQ
LOD and LOQ values for PAR and EPE were found to be, 0.49 and 0.14 μg/ml and 0.075 and 0.22
μg/ml at 245.0 nm respectively.
While the, LOD and LOQ values for PAR and EPE were found to be 0.059 and 0.18 μg/ml, 0.018
and 0.054 μg/ml at 255.0 nm respectively. Low value of LOD & LOQ indicates that the method is
sensitive.
Accuracy
The mean recoveries were found to be 99.90 ± 0.16 and 99.51 ± 0.78 for PAR and EPE,
respectively. The recoveries results indicate that the proposed method is accurate.
Ruggedness
In the ruggedness study the SD & % RSD values of PAR for Analyst 1 were (0.00063 – 0.057 %)
and for Analyst 2 (0.00078 – 0.070 %) at 245.0 nm.
In the ruggedness study the SD & % RSD values of PAR for Analyst 1 were (0.00046 – 0.18 %)
and for Analyst 2 (0.00063 – 0.25 %) at 255.0 nm.
Low value of Ruggedness indicates that the method is sensitive.
In the ruggedness study the SD & % RSD values of EPE for Analyst 1 were (0.00063 – 0.057 %)
and for Analyst 2 (0.00078 – 0.070 %) at 245.0 nm.
In the ruggedness study the SD & % RSD values of EPE for Analyst 1 were (0.00046 – 0.18 %)
and for Analyst 2 (0.00063 – 0.25 %) at 255.0 nm. Table 8.10
Low value of Ruggedness indicates that the method is sensitive.
Assay
The proposed validated method was successfully applied to determine PAR and EPE in
combined tablet dosage form. Results are given in Table 8.11. No interference of the excipient
with the absorbance of analyte of interest has been seen hence the proposed method is
suitable for the routine analysis of PAR and EPE in combined dosage forms.
Research Article CODEN: IJPRNK Impact Factor: 5.567 ISSN: 2277-8713 Satyajit P. Sathe, IJPRBS, 2017; Volume 6(4): 93-118 IJPRBS
Available Online at www.ijprbs.com 113
Summary Data of Validation Parameter
Parameters PAR EPE
At 245.0 nm At 255.0 nm At 245.0 nm At 255.0 nm
Beer’s Law Limit ((µg/ml)
2-20 µg/ml 2-20 µg/ml 2-20 µg/ml 2-20 µg/ml
Absorptivity 1111.88 254.11 265.96 1140.86
Regression Equation
(y= mx + C)
y = 0.111x -0.003
y = 0.025x + 0.004
y = 0.026x + 0.006
y = 0.118x – 0.025
Slope (m) 0.111 0.025 0.026 0.118
Intercept (c) 0.003 0.004 0.006 0.025
Correlation Coefficient (r2)
0.999 0.998 0.997 0.998
Metod Precision (Repeatability) (% RSD, n=6)
0.046 0.24 0.21 0.044
Interday (n=6)
% RSD
0.023 0.021 0.16 0.053
Intraday (n=6)
% RSD
0.10 0.49 0.45 0.47
LOD ((µg/ml) 0.49 0.059 0.075 0.018
LOQ ((µg/ml) 0.14 0.18 0.22 0.054
Recovery ±
% RSD (n=3)
99.60 ± 0.16 99.51 ± 0.78
Research Article CODEN: IJPRNK Impact Factor: 5.567 ISSN: 2277-8713 Satyajit P. Sathe, IJPRBS, 2017; Volume 6(4): 93-118 IJPRBS
Available Online at www.ijprbs.com 114
Parameters PAR EPE
At 245.0 nm At 255.0 nm At 245.0 nm At 255.0 nm
Ruggedness
(% RSD, n= 6)
Analyst 1 0.057 0.18 0.14 0.029
Analyst 2 0.070 0.25 0.13 0.035
Assay ± S. D.
(n=3)
99.90 ± 0.24 99.98 ± 0.20
SUMMARY & CONCLUSION:
The method described for the simultaneous estimation of Paracetamol and Eperisone
hydrochloride was found to be simple, responsive, correct, reproducible, economical, accurate
and precise procedures for routine simultaneous estimation of two drugs. The values of
standard deviation and % RSD were satisfactorily low and recoveries studies indicate the
reproducibility and accuracy of the method. The developed UV visible spectroscopic methods
were validated for linearity, method precision, intra-day and inter-day precision, limit of
detection, limit of quantification, accuracy, ruggedness. The standard deviation and % RSD were
satisfactorily shows low values which indicates reproducibility of method. The method
development & method validation were performed according to ICH Harmonized Tripertile
guidelines. The result of the analysis of the tablet dosage form by this method is reproducible
and reliable and is in good agreement with label claim of the drugs. The additive present in the
tablet dosage form did not interfere in the analysis. So the method can be used for the routine
analysis of drugs in combined dosage form.
REFERENCES
1. Beckett AH, and Stenlake JB, Practical Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Part II, CBS Publications
and Distributors (1997); 4th edition, Pg. No. 275-300.
2. Chatwal GR and Ananad SK, Instrumental mehod of chemical analysis, Himalya publication
house, (2004); Pg. No. 1.1-1.5.
3. Watson DG, Pharmaeutical analysis, Churchill Livingstone, (2000); Pg. No. 237-276.
Research Article CODEN: IJPRNK Impact Factor: 5.567 ISSN: 2277-8713 Satyajit P. Sathe, IJPRBS, 2017; Volume 6(4): 93-118 IJPRBS
Available Online at www.ijprbs.com 115
4. Saraf S, Various UV spectrophotometric Simultaneous estimation methods, (2006);
www.pharmainfo.net/reviews/various- UV spectrophotometric simultaneous estimation
methods, (Accessed- February 2017).
5. ICH Harmonized Tripartile Guideline. Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and
Methodology Q2B (R1), International Conference on Harmonization, Geneva, Switzerland.
6. Rang HP, Dale MM, Ritter JM and Moore PK, Pharmacology, 5th Edition, Churchill
1. Livingstone, Elsevier, (2008); Pg. No. 251-252.
7. Ballington DA and Laughlin MM, Pharmacology, 3rd Edition, CBS publishers & distributors, Pg.
No. 364-365.
8. Sweetman SC, Martindale- The Complete Drug Reference, 36th Edition, PhP Publishers, (9),
Pg. No. 41-42, 108-111.
9. Alfred Carey Carpenter, "Muscle". Online Anatomy Words (2007).
10. Douglas Harper, "Muscle". Online Etymology Dictionary (2012).
11. Brainard, Jean; Gray-Wilson, Niamh; Harwood, Jessica; Karasov, Corliss; Kraus, Dors; Willan,
CK-12 Life Science Honors for Middle School, CK-12 Foundation (2011); Pg. No. 451.
12. Marieb, EN; Hoehn, Katja, Human Anatomy & Physiology (8th ed.). San Francisco: Benjamin
Cummings (2010). Pg. No. 312.
13. A b McCloud, Aaron "Build Fast Twitch Muscle Fibers". Complete Strength Training. (2011).
14. Larsson, L; Edström, L; Lindegren, B; Gorza, L; Schiaffino, S "MHC composition and enzyme-
histochemical and physiological properties of a novel fast-twitch motor unit type". The
American Journal of Physiology (2011); 261 (1): Pg. No.93–101.
15. Urbancheka, M; Picken, E; Kalliainen, L; Kuzon, "Specific Force Deficit in Skeletal Muscles of
Old Rats Is Partially Explained by the Existence of Denervated Muscle Fibers". The J of
Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences. (2001) 56 (5): Pg. No.191–197.
16. Farvid, MS; Ng, TW; Chan, DC; Barrett, PH; Watts, GF. "Association of adiponectin and
resistin with adipose tissue compartments, insulin resistance and dyslipidaemia". Diabetes,
obesity & metabolism (2005); 7 (4): Pg. No. 406–13.
17. Khanage S. G., Mohite P. B., Jadhav S. Development and Validation of UV-Visible
Spectrophotometric Method for Simultaneous Determination of Eperisone and Paracetamol in
Solid Dosage Form. Adv Pharm Bulletin, (2013); Vol. 3(2): Pg. No. 447-451.
18. Kirtawade Rupali, Salve Pallavi, Seervi Chhotaram, Kulkarni Anita, Dhabale Pandurang.
Simultaneous UV Spectrophotometric method for Estimation of Paracetamol and Nimesulide in
Tablet Dosage Form. Int J of Chem Tech Res, (2010); Vol. 2, Pg.No.818-821.
19. Jadav Alpa V., Gohel Bhavika A., Sondagar Mital M., Patel Bhavna A., Parmar Shraddha J.
Method Development And Validation For The Simultaneous Estimation Of Paracetamol and
Etodolac By Derivative UV Spectroscopic Method. Int J of Pharm Tech Res, (2013); Vol. 5, Pg.
No. 1155-1160.
Research Article CODEN: IJPRNK Impact Factor: 5.567 ISSN: 2277-8713 Satyajit P. Sathe, IJPRBS, 2017; Volume 6(4): 93-118 IJPRBS
Available Online at www.ijprbs.com 116
20. Maske P.B and Nagras M. A. Development And Validation of Spectrophotometric Method
for Estimation of Eperisone Hydrochloride in Bulk and Tablet Dosage Form by using Area Under
Curve Method. Int J of Chem Tech Res, (2013); Vol.5, Pg No. 2210-2215.
21. Jawed Akhtar, Jatin Prajapati, Gamal Osman Elhassan , Mohammad Mujahid. Development
& Validation of Absorbance Ratio Method for Simultaneous Estimation of Lornoxicam &
Eperisone in their Synthetic Mixture. Indo Glo J of Pharm Sci, (2015); Vol. 5, Pg. No. 225-232.
22. Uchadadiya Nirav, Mehta Falgun, Sanchaniya Pinak. Development and validation of
derivative Spectrophotometric method for Simultaneous Estimation of Eperisone hydrochloride
and Paracetamol in combined tablet dosage form. Novus Int J of Chem, (2012); Vol. 1, Pg. No.
33-40.
23. Derkar Ganesh K, Chimkode R. M., Kator Gaurav, Kamble Yogesh, Jadhav Rohini, Gurav
Anita, Kamble Ashwini. Development and Validation of UV-Visible Spectrophotometric Methods
for the Estimation of Paracetamol and Diclofenac Sodium in Bulk and Tablet Dosage Form. Int J
of Pharm Res & Anal, (2015), Vol. 5, Pg. No. 52-57.
24. Bharat Jhanwar Joytosh Banerjee, Atul Kumar, Badri Prakash Nagori. Development and
Validation of UV Spectrophotometric Method for Estimation of Diclofenac Sodium and
Eperisone Hydrochloride as API and in Formulated Sustained Release Granules. Indo Ame J of
Pharm Res, (2013); Vol. 3(3): Pg. No. 2672-2685.
25. Patel Palak, Prajapati Arun, Spectrophotometric Determination of Eperisone HCl And
Lornoxicam In Synthetic Mixture. Int J of Pharm Res, (2013), Vol. 5 Pg. No. 398-403.
26. Chaudhari Bharat G, Prajapati Hetal R. Specrophotometric Estimation of Chlorzoxazone and
Paracetamol in Tablet Dosage Form by Ratio Spectra Derivative Method Int J of pharm & Drug
Anal, (2014); Vol. 2, Pg. No. 251-258.
27. Patel Satish A., Gargi A. Development and Validation of Ratio Spectra Derivative
2. Spectrophotometric Method for Simultanious Analysis of Tolperisone HCl and Paracetamol
in Synthetic Mixture. Int J of pharm & Drug Anal, (2014); Vol. 2(3), Pg. No. 271-274.
28. Islam Ashraful S.M., Abuzar Sharif M. and Kumar Pijush Paul Validation of UV-
Spectrophotometric and RP-HPLC methods for the simultaneous analysis of Paracetamol and
Aceclofenac in marketed tablets. Int J of pharma & life sci, (2011); Vol. 2 (12), Pg. No. 1267-
1275.
29. Khaleda H. Al-Saidi and Rana A, Hammza. Spectrophotometric Determination of
Promethazine Hydrochloride and Paracetamol in Pharmaceutical Tablets. J of Al-Nahrain
University, (2014); Vol.17 (1), Pg. No. 14-23.
30. Nikam A. D., Pawar Sampada S., and Gandhi S. V. Estimation of Paracetamol and
Aceclofenac in Tablet Formulation by Ratio Spectra Derivative Spectroscopy. Indian Pharm J Sci,
(2008); Vol.70 (5), Pg. No. 635-637.
Research Article CODEN: IJPRNK Impact Factor: 5.567 ISSN: 2277-8713 Satyajit P. Sathe, IJPRBS, 2017; Volume 6(4): 93-118 IJPRBS
Available Online at www.ijprbs.com 117
31. Sawant R, Raihan A, Ramadin S., Darade S, Spectrophotometric estimation of Paracetamol
and Promethazine in tablet dosage forms, Der Pharma Chemica, (2012); Vol. 4 (2), Pg. No. 714-
719.
32. Chaudhari Bharat G, Rami Ruchita R. Validated Spectrophotometric Method for the
Determination of Paracetamol and Tamadol Hydrochloride in Tablet dosage form, Int J of
pharma & drug anal, (2014); Vol. 2 (4), Pg. No. 303-310.
33. Mali Audumbar, Kolekar Sujata, Panachery Jeeja, Tamboli Ashpak Simultaneous
Determination of Paracetamol and Domperidone in Pharmaceutical Dosage Form by First Order
Derivative UV Spectrophotometry, Asian J Pharm Res (2016); Vol. 6 (1), Pg. No. 303-310.
34. Khaleda Hamid Al-Saidi , Firyal Waly Askar and Asraa Abed AL-Abaas, Simultaneous
Determination of Paracetamol and Cephalexin Binary mixtures by Using Derivative
Spectrophotometry and H-point Standard Addition Methods. AL- Mustansiriya J. Sci (2010); Vol.
21 (6), Pg. No. 192-203.
35. Rote A, Kumbhoje P, Bhambar R, UV-visible spectrophotometric simultaneous estimation
of Paracetamol and Nabumetone by AUC method in combined tablet dosage form. Pharm
Methods, (2012); Vol. 3 (1), Pg. No. 40-43.
36. Manyatha D. D, Shetty Satishkumar. A, Manzoor Ahamed, Vijaya Krishna Aradhya, Anil
Kumar S. M. Simultaneous Determination and Validation of Codeine Phosphate and
Paracetamol by Zero Order and First Order derivative method in Bulk and Pharmaceutical
Formulation. Int J of Uni Pharm and Bio Sci (2017); Vol. 6 (2), Pg. No. 214-227.
37. Ghulam Murtaza, Shujaat Ali Khan, Arham Shabbir, Arshad Mahmood, Muhammad
Hassham Hassan Bin Asad, Kalsoom Farzana, Nadia Shamshad Malik and Izhar Hussain
Development of a UV-spectrophotometric method for the simultaneous determination of
Aspirin and Paracetamol in tablets. Sci Res and Essays (2011); Vol. 6 (2), Pg. No. 417-421.
38. Hable Asawaree Anand and Rokade Jaydip Jaywant Development and Validation of Ratio
Spectra Derivative Spectrophotometric Method for Determination of Ternary Mixture of
Ibuprofen, Paracetamol, Chlorzoxazone In Formulation. Asian J of Res in Chem and Pharm Sci
(2016); Vol. 4 (2), Pg. No. 45-51.
39. Murthy S, Sekhar C, Kumar B, Kumar P, Spectrophotometric determaination of Paracetamol
using sodium bismuthate as chromogen, Int J of Res in Chem and Env (2012); Vol. 2 (1), Pg. No.
231-235.
40. Giriraj P. and Sivakkumar T. New Simple Spectrophotometric Method for the Simultaneous
Estimation of Paracetamol and Flupirtine Maleate in Pure and Pharmaceutical Dosage Form. Int
J of Spectroscopy (2014); Vol. 4 (1), Pg. No. 1-6.
41. Mashrul Rajashree, Damor Dharmendra, Mittal Karan, Patel Bhoomi, Method development
and validation of simultaneous estimation of cilostazol and telmisartan, J Of Pharm Anal (2015);
Vol. 4 (3), Pg. No. 41-48.
Research Article CODEN: IJPRNK Impact Factor: 5.567 ISSN: 2277-8713 Satyajit P. Sathe, IJPRBS, 2017; Volume 6(4): 93-118 IJPRBS
Available Online at www.ijprbs.com 118
42. Patil Dipak D., Shetty Poornima R., Applications of simultaneous equation method and
derivative method for the determination of Rabeprazole sodium and Levosulpiride in
pharmaceutical dosage form and dissolution samples, J of the Asso of arab uni for basic & app
sci (2014); Vol. 1 (15), Pg. No. 53-60.
43. Inamullah, Singh Sunil, Rai Jyoti, Choudhary Nisha, Sharma Surabhi and Gautam Hemendra,
Stability-indicating absorption ratio method for estimation of atorvastatin calcium and
fenofibrate in tablet dosage form by using UV-Vis spectrophotomer, Der Pharm Lettre (2013);
Vol. 5 (3), Pg. No. 90-98.
44. Kakdiya Mehul, Patel Anup, Madiya Darshan, Faldu Shital, Analytical Method Development
and Validation for Simultaneous Estimation of Paracetamol and Propyphenazone in their
Combined Pharmaceutical Dosage Form by simultaneous Equation Method, PharmaTutor
Magazine (2014); Vol. 2 (6), Pg. No. 154-159.
45. Sujani PV, Phanindra SS, Anasuya P, Reddy Padamanabha Y, and N Devanna. Development
and Validation of Simultaneous Equation Method for the Estimation of Metformin amd
Sitagliptin by UV Spectroscopy. J of Pharm & P’ceutical sci, (2013); Vol. 2 (2), Pg. No. 72-75.
46. Agrawal Govind P. Rohitas Mohit, Agrawal Abhinav, Jain Ashish K, Lariya Narendra K, And
Kharya Anil K. Development of Simultaneous Spectrophotometric Method of Mesalazine and
Prednisolone in same dosage form. Int J of Applied & P’ceutics, (2010); Vol. 2 (4), Pg. No. 08-11.
47. Bhandani Shweta, Sellappan Mohan. Development and Validation of Simultaneous
Equation Method for Simultaneous Estimation of Amlodipine Besylate and Indapamide in
Combined Dosage Form. Am. J PharmTech Res, (2013); Vol. 3 (3), Pg. No. 694-702.
48. Indian Pharmacopoeia., Volume 1, 2, 3, Indian Pharmacopoeial Commision, Government of
India, Ministry of Health and family welfare, (2010); Pg. No. 309, 392, 1191-1193, 1859-1863.
49. Paracetamol- Drug Profile, http://www.drugbank.ca/drugs/DB00316 (accessed: December
2016).
50. Drug Profile- Paracetamol, http://www.wikipedia.com/paracetamol (accessed: December
2016).
51. Eperisone Drug Profile, http://www.drugfuture.com/chemdata/eperisone.html (accessed:
December 2016)
52. Drug Profile- Paracetamol, http://www.wikipedia.com/paracetamol (accessed: December
2016)