Upload
farica
View
34
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
2006 Teaching and Learning Symposium. Interactive Classroom: Why Use a Classroom Response System. David T. Marx Physics Department Illinois State University. The Passive Classroom. Students listen to traditional lecture and take notes (lots of variations on this theme). Low attendance - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Interactive Classroom:Interactive Classroom:Why Use a Classroom Response SystemWhy Use a Classroom Response System
The Passive ClassroomThe Passive Classroom Students listen to traditional lecture and Students listen to traditional lecture and
take notes (lots of variations on this theme).take notes (lots of variations on this theme). Low attendanceLow attendance Little knowledge gained – no long term Little knowledge gained – no long term
gaingain No long term effect on students’ No long term effect on students’
misconceptionsmisconceptions No conceptual understandingNo conceptual understanding Student’s inclination to memorize Student’s inclination to memorize
algorithms is reinforced.algorithms is reinforced. Disinterested students disappear in the Disinterested students disappear in the
crowd.crowd.
Active ClassroomsActive Classrooms
Overview - Case Studies (L,S)Overview - Case Studies (L,S) Cooperative Groups (S)Cooperative Groups (S) Socratic Dialogue Inducing Labs (Lab)Socratic Dialogue Inducing Labs (Lab) Interactive Demonstrations (L,S)Interactive Demonstrations (L,S) Peer Instruction / Think-Pair-Share (L,S)Peer Instruction / Think-Pair-Share (L,S) Tutorials / Workshops (S)Tutorials / Workshops (S) Etc.Etc.
The Interactive ClassroomThe Interactive ClassroomThings you can do…Things you can do…
Class ParticipationClass Participation Give Reading QuizzesGive Reading Quizzes Check understanding (feedback)Check understanding (feedback) Pre- and Post-TestingPre- and Post-Testing Peer Instruction / Think-Pair-SharePeer Instruction / Think-Pair-Share Interactive DemonstrationsInteractive Demonstrations etc.etc.
The Interactive ClassroomThe Interactive ClassroomEvidence That It WorksEvidence That It Works
Richard Hake (Indiana U.- Richard Hake (Indiana U.- Bloomington)Bloomington) 6542 student study comparing 6542 student study comparing
traditional versus interactive lecturestraditional versus interactive lectures 62 introductory physics courses62 introductory physics courses Pre- and Post-Instruction TestingPre- and Post-Instruction Testing Measured Normalized GainMeasured Normalized Gain
e
ePost
S
SSg
Pr
Pr
100 −−
>=<
Richard Hake American Journal of Physics v66 p64-74 (1998)
Traditional<gain> = 0.23 ± 0.04
Interactive<gain> = 0.48 ± 0.14
Benefits Others have SeenBenefits Others have Seen Interactive engagement shows a 2Interactive engagement shows a 2
improvement in students learning improvement in students learning mechanics over traditional lectures.mechanics over traditional lectures.
Substantial impact on pre- versus post-Substantial impact on pre- versus post-test results in physics, astronomy, test results in physics, astronomy, economics, biology, chemistry, economics, biology, chemistry, computer science, and engineeringcomputer science, and engineering
Even more effective in conjunction with Even more effective in conjunction with methods that induce thinking before methods that induce thinking before lecture – Just in Time Teaching (JITT).lecture – Just in Time Teaching (JITT).
Benefits I have SeenBenefits I have Seen Students read the textbook in detail.Students read the textbook in detail. Class Overall Averages upClass Overall Averages up
(75-78 % versus 67-70%)(75-78 % versus 67-70%)
Attendance typically 85+%Attendance typically 85+% Student’s interest level in science Student’s interest level in science
increases…many students decide to increases…many students decide to take more courses in physics as a take more courses in physics as a result.result.
Four other colleagues in physics Four other colleagues in physics observe the same benefits.observe the same benefits.
Class Survey 10/2005