19
INTELLIGENT TOOLING Team 99.08 Joseph Staley Jeffrey Roushey Glenn Gardner Andrew Graybill

INTELLIGENT TOOLING

  • Upload
    otis

  • View
    36

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

INTELLIGENT TOOLING. Team 99.08 Joseph StaleyJeffrey Roushey Glenn GardnerAndrew Graybill. Design Concept Review. Background - Mission - Approach Customers - Wants - Constraints Benchmarking Quality Metrics - Target Values Concept Generation Concept Selection - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

  • INTELLIGENT TOOLINGTeam 99.08

    Joseph StaleyJeffrey RousheyGlenn GardnerAndrew Graybill

  • Design Concept ReviewBackground - Mission - ApproachCustomers - Wants - ConstraintsBenchmarkingQuality Metrics - Target ValuesConcept GenerationConcept Selection Schedule - Budget

  • BackgroundWhat is Metal Foam?

    How is it Produced?

    Why Use Metal Foam?

  • Project Summary MissionTo develop a sensor system that will signal the completion of the metal foaming process inside a mold.ApproachBy working together as a team, making use of the customers resources, and performing extensive research we will provide the best possible sensor system design for our problem.

  • Customers - Wants - Constraints

    Customers

    Wants

    Constraints

    Metrics

    Chin-Jye Yu, Fraunhofer USA

    High % of Successful Foams, System Simplicity / Reliability,

    Low Cost

    Cost, Operating Temperature,

    LabVIEW, Furnace

    Dimensions, Surface Defects, Max. temp, Signal Alts., Set-up time, Mold Alts., Life, Cost, Program time

    Harald Eifert, Fraunhofer USA

    High % of Sucessful Foams, Low Cost

    Dimensions, Surface Defects, Cost

  • Customers - Wants - Constraints

    Customers

    Wants

    Constraints

    Metrics

    Bernard McGuiness, Lab RA, FRC-DE

    Jim Adkins, Lab Coordinator, FRC-DE

    High % of Successful Foams, System Simplicity / Reliability

    Operating Temperature,

    Furnace

    Dimensions, Surface Defects, Max. temp, Signal Alts., Set-up time, Mold Alts., Life

    Automotive, Aerospace, Building /Construction Industries

    High % of Successful Foams, System Simplicity / Reliability, Low Cost

    Operating Temperature

    Dimensions, Surface Defects, Max. temp, Signal Alts., Set-up time, Mold Alts., Life

  • System BenchmarkingDie Casting / Injection Moldinggeneral process, sensorsHigh Temperature Monitoringhigh temperature materials (Macor)data acquisitionMaterials Level Monitoringsensors

  • Functional BenchmarkingElectrical Properties SensorsPiezo-electric TransducerThermocoupleOptical FiberEddy Current Detector

  • Target Values

    Metric

    Target Value

    Dimensions

    3.5 X 3.5 X 0.5

    # Surface Defects

    0

    Sensor System Life

    5 years

    Maximum Operating Temp.

    700 C

    # Signal Alterations

    0

    Programming Time

    20 hours

    Set-up Time

    30 minutes

    # Mold Alterations

    0

    Cost

    $2,000

  • Critical FunctionsSense metal foaming process completionAttenuate/Amplify the sensor output signalChannel signal(s) into data acquisition cardUse LabVIEW software to interpret signals and alert user that the process is complete

  • Concept GenerationElectrical Circuit CompletionPiezo-Electric Force SensorThermocouple ArrayOptical FiberEddy Current Position Sensor

  • Concept Selection Method

    Metric

    Raw Score

    SSD Correlation

    Weighted Score

    Estimated Target Value

    Dimensions

    4

    9.89

    39.56

    ?

    # Surface Defects

    3

    9.89

    9.67

    No (1)

    Sensor Sys. Life

    5

    13.187

    65.935

    Yes

    Max. Op. Temp.

    5

    14.286

    71.43

    Yes

    # Signal Alts.

    5

    9.89

    49.45

    Yes

    Progrmg. Time

    5

    9.89

    49.45

    Yes

    Set-up Time

    4

    9.89

    39.56

    Yes

    # Mold Alts.

    2

    9.89

    19.78

    No (2)

    Cost

    5

    13.187

    65.935

    Yes

    Total Score

    430.77

  • Concept Selection

    Concept

    Total Weighted Score

    Electrical Circuit Completion

    431

    Piezo-Electric Force Plate

    325

    Thermocouple Array

    312

    Eddy Current Position Sensor

    235

    Optical Fiber

    196

  • Conductivity Testing at Room Temperature

  • Conductivity Testing at 700 C

  • Schedule - Fall 98

  • Schedule - Spring 99

  • Estimated Budget

    Part

    Material Cost

    Machining Cost

    Approximate Cost

    Copper Mold

    $5

    $495

    $500

    Ceramic Insulator

    $150

    $450

    $600

    Copper Electrode Large

    $2

    $128

    $130

    Copper Electrode Small

    $2

    $128

    $130

    Copper Wire

    $4

    $0

    $4

    Terminal Board

    $0

    $0

    $0

    Battery 9V

    $0

    $0

    $0

    Computer (CPU)

    $0

    $0

    $0

    Total Cost

    $1,364

  • Future DirectionWinter Break - Build ConceptFebruary - Testing and Design IterationsMarch - Cushion PeriodApril - Final Report Preparation