Upload
mariusz-kowalski
View
229
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/25/2019 INTEGREATED SYSTEM OF METALWORK PRODUCTION.pdf
1/25
Table of Contents
Index of Figures ..................................................................................................................................... 26
1. Objective of Project ......................................................................................................................... 3
2. Spectrum of Work Parts .................................................................................................................. 3
2.1. Item I - stepped shaft .............................................................................................................. 3
2.2. Item IIcasing .......................................................................................................................... 4
2.3. Item IIIsleeve 1 ..................................................................................................................... 5
2.4. Item IVsleeve 2 .................................................................................................................... 6
2.5. Item Vplate 1 ....................................................................................................................... 7
2.6. Item VIsleeve3 ..................................................................................................................... 8
2.7. Item VIIlever....................................................................................................................... 9
3. Resources ...................................................................................................................................... 10
3.1. Available machines ................................................................................................................ 10
3.2. Human resources................................................................................................................... 14
4. Flow Modelling .............................................................................................................................. 15
4.1. Flow process chart ................................................................................................................. 15
4.2. Aggregated material flow by machines ................................................................................. 15
5. Spatial Structure. ....................................................................................................................... 16
6. Method of Scheduling ................................................................................................................... 17
7. Production Schedule ..................................................................................................................... 17
8. Resource Utilization ...................................................................................................................... 19
9. Reports .......................................................................................................................................... 22
10. Conclusions ................................................................................................................................ 23
10.1. Critical path ....................................................................................................................... 24
10.2. Bottlenecks ........................................................................................................................ 25
11. Bibliography ............................................................................................................................... 26
7/25/2019 INTEGREATED SYSTEM OF METALWORK PRODUCTION.pdf
2/25
INTEGREATED SYSTEM OF METALWORK PRODUCTION PAGE3
1. Objective of Project
The objective of this project is planning of production of various items usingmachines available in an
assumed production hall. The first part of the project includes the choice of items to be made,
assigning necessary types and times of tooling for each part, choosing machines and ways oftransport, and planning of locating them in the production hall. Next step is using computer aided
machining software. It will allow us to optimize the production process itself, but it will also improve
the use of machines and reduce time of work and demurrage, which makes the production
adjustable to dynamically changing market needs
2. Spectrum of Work Parts
Selected objects are made of semi-finished steel products and they require fallowing machining
processes: turning, milling, drilling, grinding, tempering. Each item in the final stage is checked for
preserving the required dimensions and tolerances on shape and position-coordinate measuring
machine. The following items were presented with the scheduling of machining sequence.
2.1. Item I - stepped shaft
Figure 1 Stepped shaft
Semi-finished product
shaft 45x300, with prepared Centring holes and face surfaces
Machining planning
No. Operation of technological process Machine Identification
1.Profile turning-threading M30, groove
machiningTurning Centre TC
2. Milling key way and slot Milling Centre MC
3. Finish grinding Grinder G
4. Quality assurance(control of shapes anddimensions)
Coordinate Measuring Machine CMM
7/25/2019 INTEGREATED SYSTEM OF METALWORK PRODUCTION.pdf
3/25
INTEGREATED SYSTEM OF METALWORK PRODUCTION PAGE4
2.2. Item II casing
Figure 2 Casing
Semi-finished product
Steel cuboid 200x150x90
Base: central hole 46,25H6
Machining planning
No. Operation of technological process Machine Identification
1. Processingdatumhole 46,25H6 Milling Centre MC
2. Milling surfaces Milling Centre MC
3. Machining 14, 6 and threading M14, M6 Milling Centre MC
4. Quality assuranceCoordinate Measuring
MachineCMM
7/25/2019 INTEGREATED SYSTEM OF METALWORK PRODUCTION.pdf
4/25
INTEGREATED SYSTEM OF METALWORK PRODUCTION PAGE5
2.3. Item III sleeve 1
Figure 3 Sleeve I
Semi-finished product
Rolled rod 120
Base: rolledsurface 120
Machining planning
No. Operation of technological process Machine Identification
1. Turning cylindrical surfaces 63j6, 55 Turning Centre TC
2. Turning phases Turning Centre TC
3.Performance of hole 35H6 and stepped
holes 13, 24Milling Centre MC
4. Performance of side hole 15 Milling Centre MC
5. Grinding surface 63j6 Grinder G
6. Grinding hole Grinder G
7. Quality assuranceCoordinate Measuring
Machine
CMM
7/25/2019 INTEGREATED SYSTEM OF METALWORK PRODUCTION.pdf
5/25
INTEGREATED SYSTEM OF METALWORK PRODUCTION PAGE6
2.4. Item IV sleeve 2
Figure 4 Sleeve II
Semi-finished product
Rolled rod 66
Base: rolled surface 46
Machining planning
No. Operation of technological process Machine Identification
1. Face milling Turning Centre TC
2. Rough turning Turning Centre TC
3. Profile turning Turning Centre TC
4. Finish turning Turning Centre TC
5. Key way Milling Milling Centre MC
6. Drilling Milling Centre MC
7. Finishgrinding Grinder G
8. Hardening Induction Hardening Machine IH
9. Quality assuranceCoordinate Measuring
MachineCMM
7/25/2019 INTEGREATED SYSTEM OF METALWORK PRODUCTION.pdf
6/25
INTEGREATED SYSTEM OF METALWORK PRODUCTION PAGE7
2.5. Item V plate 1
Figure 5 Plate
Semi finished product
Rolled rod 212
Base: rolled surface 212
Machining planning
No. Operation of technological process Machine Identification
1. Turning the cylindrical surface 140 Turning Centre TC
2. Turning phases and rounding Turning Centre TC
3.Performance of holes 145, 131, 120,
95H8, 85, 73, 8, 6, 3Milling Centre MC
4. Tapping of holes 8 Milling Centre MC
5. Quality assuranceCoordinate Measuring
MachineCMM
7/25/2019 INTEGREATED SYSTEM OF METALWORK PRODUCTION.pdf
7/25
INTEGREATED SYSTEM OF METALWORK PRODUCTION PAGE8
2.6. Item VI sleeve3
Figure 6 Sleeve with flange
Semi finished product
Rolled rod 120
Base: rolled surface 120
Machining planning
No. Operation of technological process Machine Identification
1. Turning cylindrical surfaces 60j6 Turning Centre TC
2. Turning phases Turning Centre TC
3. Performance of hole 35H6 and holes 13 Milling Centre MC
5. Grinding surface 60j6 Grinder G
6. Grinding hole 35H6 Grinder G
7. Tapping M36 thread Grinder G
8. Quality assuranceCoordinate Measuring
MachineCMM
7/25/2019 INTEGREATED SYSTEM OF METALWORK PRODUCTION.pdf
8/25
INTEGREATED SYSTEM OF METALWORK PRODUCTION PAGE9
2.7. Item VII lever
Figure 7 Lever
Semi-finished product
Forging
Base: hole 20H7
Machining planning
No. Operation of technological process Machine Identification
1.Preparation of the baseperformance of
20H7 holesMilling Centre MC
2. Face milling Milling Centre MC
4. Quality assuranceCoordinate Measuring
MachineCMM
7/25/2019 INTEGREATED SYSTEM OF METALWORK PRODUCTION.pdf
9/25
INTEGREATED SYSTEM OF METALWORK PRODUCTION PAGE10
3. Resources
3.1. Available machines
a) Turning Centre
Figure 8 Turning Centre
Horizontal turning centre
For turning of shafts: using tusk, the turned item is fixed in the spindle grip
Provided with a tools warehouse
Presence of a worker responsible for tooling and changing of items is required
7/25/2019 INTEGREATED SYSTEM OF METALWORK PRODUCTION.pdf
10/25
INTEGREATED SYSTEM OF METALWORK PRODUCTION PAGE11
b) Milling Centre
Figure 9 Milling centre
Vertical milling centre
Milling the external surfaces and holes
Drilling and threading the holes
Provided with a tools warehouse
Presence of a worker responsible for tooling and changing of items is required
7/25/2019 INTEGREATED SYSTEM OF METALWORK PRODUCTION.pdf
11/25
INTEGREATED SYSTEM OF METALWORK PRODUCTION PAGE12
c) CNC grinder
Figure 10 CNC Grinder
For grinding the external surfaces and holes
For grinding small and medium elements for unit and series production
d) Coordinate Measuring Machine
Figure 11 Coordinate Measuring Machine
High quality measuring
Measurement of complicated items
Multisensor machine for different measuring jobs
7/25/2019 INTEGREATED SYSTEM OF METALWORK PRODUCTION.pdf
12/25
INTEGREATED SYSTEM OF METALWORK PRODUCTION PAGE13
e) Induction Hardening Machine
Figure 12 Induction Hardening Machine
Heat treatment; induction hardening
For induction hardening the surfaces of shafts, bolts, sleeves, flat surfaces, sleeve fronts, gear
wheels
High efficiency, series treatment
f) Forklift
Figure 13 Forklift
Manual forklift with a scale
Capacity of 2500kg
7/25/2019 INTEGREATED SYSTEM OF METALWORK PRODUCTION.pdf
13/25
INTEGREATED SYSTEM OF METALWORK PRODUCTION PAGE14
3.2. Human resources
According to Figure 16 "Diagram of a 2-cellular production hall", there will be two cells equipped with
machines. In first - two milling and turning centres. In second - induction hardening machine, grinder
and coordinate measuring machine. All of machines have to be operated on some level.
a) Cell one
Two milling and turning centres will be operated by 4 persons from. There is need to manual
change of objects.
b) Cell two
Grinder will be operated by one qualificated employee
CMM will be operated by one qualificated employee
c) Both cells
There is need of two persons that would transport semi-finished products between
machines.
7/25/2019 INTEGREATED SYSTEM OF METALWORK PRODUCTION.pdf
14/25
INTEGREATED SYSTEM OF METALWORK PRODUCTION PAGE15
4. Flow Modelling
4.1. Flow process chart
Routes present planned machining sequence of products.
Figure 14 Flow process chart. P1-P7 products; TC turning center; MCmilling center; G grinder; IH induction
hardening machine; CMMcoordinate measuring machine; S1,S2 storages.
4.2. Aggregated material flow by machines
Routes present material flow that helps to find disproportion in use of machines.
Figure 15 Network of material connections
7/25/2019 INTEGREATED SYSTEM OF METALWORK PRODUCTION.pdf
15/25
INTEGREATED SYSTEM OF METALWORK PRODUCTION PAGE16
Both figures help to findpossible bottle-necks. It is easy tonotice that MC and CMM have to work on
more parts then other machines.
5. Spatial Structure.
Main aim of setting spatial structure is to shorter ways of semi-finished products, this leads to short
times of transport and work that is put into it. Less work = less money spent.
At first step machines were supposed to be set by criterion of product specialization as it is shown in
table 1.
Cell Machine P1 P3 P4 P6 P2 P5 P7
1
IH 4
G 3 3 3 3
TC 1 1 1 1 1
2MC 2 2 2 2 1 2 1
CMM 4 4 5 4 2 3 2
Table 1 Spatial structure set by criterion of product specialization
But after analyzing this structure in front of flow process it was noticed that products would flow
back to previous cell which is waste of time. Observation was cause of working out better solution
and after taking into account this fact final structure was set by criterion of organisational
concentration [Table 2].
Cell Machine P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7
1TC 1 1 1 1 1
MC 2 1 2 2 2 2 1
2
G 3 3 3 3
IH 4
CMM 4 2 4 5 3 4 2
Table 2Spatial structure set by criterion of organisational concentration
Figure 15 visualizes final spatial structure.
7/25/2019 INTEGREATED SYSTEM OF METALWORK PRODUCTION.pdf
16/25
INTEGREATED SYSTEM OF METALWORK PRODUCTION PAGE17
Figure 16 Diagram of a 2-cellular production hall
6. Method of Scheduling
In the educational version of Preactor 9.3 there are three methods of scheduling: forward
scheduling, backward scheduling and APS (Advanced Planning System). Present project uses forward
scheduling, providing a solution characterized by the earliest date of completion of production. In
addition operations were set in compliance with FIFO (First In First Out)strategy. The earliest ordersare executed first and the latest are at the end of the list.
7. Production Schedule
Gant chart below presents the scheduling of process.
7/25/2019 INTEGREATED SYSTEM OF METALWORK PRODUCTION.pdf
17/25
INTEGREATED SYSTEM OF METALWORK PRODUCTION PAGE18
Figure 17 Gantt chart
7/25/2019 INTEGREATED SYSTEM OF METALWORK PRODUCTION.pdf
18/25
INTEGREATED SYSTEM OF METALWORK PRODUCTION PAGE19
8. Resource Utilization
Figure 18 Resource utilization chart. Red line indicates average machine utilization(15,39%)
Charts below present theindividual use of machinesin %.
10,56%
1,67%
87,77%
Turning centre TC1
Util ization time Set-up time No work time
8,75%
1,25%
90,00%
Turning centre TC2
Utilization time Set-up time No work time
7/25/2019 INTEGREATED SYSTEM OF METALWORK PRODUCTION.pdf
19/25
INTEGREATED SYSTEM OF METALWORK PRODUCTION PAGE20
16,11% 2,64%
81,25%
Milling centre MC1
Util ization time Set-up time No work time
15,90% 2,22%
81,88%
Milling centre MC2
Utilization time Set-up time No work time
10,67%1,94%
87,39%
CNC grinder - G
Utilization time Set-up time No work time
30,35%
4,17%
65,48%
Coordinate Measuring
Machine CMM
Utilization time Set-up time No work time
2,08% 0%
97,92%
Forklift 1
Utilization time Set-up time No work time
8,33%0%
91,67%
Forklift 2
Utilization time Set-up time No work time
7/25/2019 INTEGREATED SYSTEM OF METALWORK PRODUCTION.pdf
20/25
INTEGREATED SYSTEM OF METALWORK PRODUCTION PAGE21
In analysis of the chart presented above, one concludes that uniform loadings are not possible. The
forklifts are the least used machines in this chart, because they carry entire series of products, not
individual parts.
The most used machine is Coordinate Measuring Machine. Every part must be checked, so the
company can provide high quality of products. This problem could be resolved by reducing steps of
quality assurance to most important parts or not checking all objects but only a part of them. In
order to provide high quality of products, the system has to assume a high chance of dimensional
incapability, therefore a big part of the production must be checked, so the usage of CMM remains
very big. Automation of quality assurance could also solve the problem.
4,17% 0%
95,83%
Induction Hardening Machine
IH
Utilization time Set-up time No work time
7/25/2019 INTEGREATED SYSTEM OF METALWORK PRODUCTION.pdf
21/25
INTEGREATED SYSTEM OF METALWORK PRODUCTION PAGE22
9. Reports
Table 3 Schedule performance metrics
Table 4Summary of orders
7/25/2019 INTEGREATED SYSTEM OF METALWORK PRODUCTION.pdf
22/25
INTEGREATED SYSTEM OF METALWORK PRODUCTION PAGE23
10.Conclusions
Job Completion Data
Total Minimum Average Maximum
Lead time 2d 4h 20min 3h 39min 7h 29min 11h 23min
Added Value Percentage 23,43 49,03 87,36
Resource Data
Minimum Average Maximum
Working Percentage 4,3 24,51 62,61
Setup Percentage 0 3,18 8,6
Schedule Duration 11h 38 min
Table 5 Shorten schedule performance metrics
Conclusions are based on reports collected from Preactor APS program, presented in the previous
section.
Our criterion was integration of production system. Optimal solution has been found using Preactor.
Characteristic parameters of the system are presented below.
Length of the ProductionCycle(LPC)
In the present system, the production of the FIFO scheduling forward - by benchmarks - the
length of the production cycle is 11 hours 38 minutes.
This is the time it takes to complete a set of tasks, so this value should decrease to the
minimum, which proves most effective use of work time for each machines. The lower the
LPC time, the faster the company can accept new orders and generate more profits.
Degree of Utilization of Resources (DUR)
Resources are machines and forklifts. Value DUR should strive for the maximum, however
forklifts significantly decrease the average utilization of resources. At the same time at this
point it is worth mentioning that loadings should be similar if we want to avoid bottle necks.
If one machine is overloaded other machines have to wait until previous steps are executed.
Order Flow Time (OFT)
The value of the order flow time strive for minimum because it presents the time, an object
stays in the system. In this project the total execution time is 2d 4h 20min which is collective
timeforall orders. This is not atimeof technological processes, because in addition tothe time
7/25/2019 INTEGREATED SYSTEM OF METALWORK PRODUCTION.pdf
23/25
INTEGREATED SYSTEM OF METALWORK PRODUCTION PAGE24
requiredto performeach operation,downtimeis also taken into account. The pointis to
obtainthe smoothest possibleflow.
The percentage ofadded value
The percentage of added value is also a measure of the effectiveness of the system. The
highest values are recommended, because it grows during an ongoing machining of the work
piece. This is the equivalentto sayingthat during downtime, that is, when the object is waiting
for its turn, the added valuedoes not change. In the present case it is much about 49.03%.
10.1. Critical path
Longest sequence ofactivities in aproject plan which must becompleted on time for theproject to
complete ondue date.An activity on the critical path cannot be started until its predecessor activity
is complete; if it is delayed for aday,the entire project will be delayed for a day unless the activity
following the delayed activity is completed a day earlier. Figure 19 shows critical path on Gant chart.
Figure 19 Critical path
As could be seen critical path is mainly processing of item P1. Whole time is 11h and 38min if any
operation of critical path will be longer, final time will get longer too.
http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/activity.htmlhttp://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/project-planning.htmlhttp://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/completed.htmlhttp://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/project.htmlhttp://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/due-date.htmlhttp://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/day.htmlhttp://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/day.htmlhttp://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/due-date.htmlhttp://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/project.htmlhttp://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/completed.htmlhttp://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/project-planning.htmlhttp://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/activity.html7/25/2019 INTEGREATED SYSTEM OF METALWORK PRODUCTION.pdf
24/25
INTEGREATED SYSTEM OF METALWORK PRODUCTION PAGE25
10.2. Bottlenecks and possible improvements
Bottlenecks are caused by overlapping of orders at the same time - conflict situations arise, e.g.
Different types of treatment areperformed at the same machines. This leads to delays and waiting
for the next objects to bemachined. This is undesirable, however, with a limited number of
resources, and a more complex structure of the socket it is hard to avoid this phenomena. One
solution could be to equip a production hall with an additional machine, but only if such a step would
be profitable for the company.
Figure 20 Bottlenecks on Gantt chart
On the figure above we can see bottlenecks of order P6/CARGOTECH/02. We can easily notice that
the largest exist before CMM and as it was said in chapter "Resource utilization" times of operations
should be shortened or new machine should be bought. There is also need of intermediate store
because CMM is a bottleneck for almost every part.
Another way to increase the efficiency of the production process is to include an industrial robot to
automate the material handling. This solution requires scheduling of the robot, and makes the
planning of process more complex, but it would increase the productivity significantly.
10.3. Summary
The integration of the production system manifests itself in sockets cooperation, as well as in the
stream intert wining activities around basic operations, such as transport and storage activities or
setup. The integration therefore allows a flexible response to market needs, changes and
modernization ofproduction processes. One should therefore seek to obtain it, which will increase
the productivity and efficiency of the entire system.
7/25/2019 INTEGREATED SYSTEM OF METALWORK PRODUCTION.pdf
25/25
Index of Figures
Figure 1 Stepped shaft............................................................................................................................. 3
Figure 2 Casing ........................................................................................................................................ 4
Figure 3 Sleeve I ....................................................................................................................................... 5
Figure 4 Sleeve II ...................................................................................................................................... 6
Figure 5 Plate ........................................................................................................................................... 7
Figure 6 Sleeve with flange ..................................................................................................................... 8
Figure 7 Lever .......................................................................................................................................... 9
Figure 8 Turning Centre ......................................................................................................................... 10
Figure 9 Milling centre ........................................................................................................................... 11
Figure 10 CNC Grinder ........................................................................................................................... 12
Figure 11 Coordinate Measuring Machine ............................................................................................ 12
Figure 12 Induction Hardening Machine ............................................................................................... 13
Figure 13 Forklift ................................................................................................................................... 13
Figure 14 Flow process chart .....................................................................Error! Bookmark not defined.
Figure 15 Network of material connections .......................................................................................... 15
Figure 16 Diagram of a 2-cellular production hall ................................................................................. 17
Figure 17 Gantt chart ............................................................................................................................ 18
Figure 18 Resource utilization chart ...................................................................................................... 19
Figure 19 Critical path ........................................................................................................................... 24
Figure 20 Bottlenecks on Gantt chart ................................................................................................... 25
11.Bibliography
[1] M. Siemitkowski, INTEGRTED SYSTEMS OF PRODUCTION - lectures, Gdask: GUT, 2014.
[2] Preactor International Ltd., Preactor - Podrcznik uytkownika, Warszawa: Prtczyski, 2004.