Upload
dangdieu
View
229
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Integrating ARNOLD
into the Workflow
2016 GIS-T Symposium
Presented by:
Brett Juul, GIS Manager, ODOT
Marc Kratzschmar, Senior Consultant, Bentley Systems
April 8, 2016
2
Agenda
• Network Data Demands on DOTs
• What it takes to get statewide
coverage
– Standards and shared working
– DOT leadership
• Integrated Reporting Database
Demands On DOT Network Data
• Federal Mandates for common LRS
– Performance (HPMS includes Pavement and Traffic data)
– Bridge (NBI)
– Crash(FARS and others)
– Federal Aid Projects (FMIS)
– Certified Mileage
• DOT Decision Support and Analysis
• All rely on network data
– Increasing demands for coverage
– Increasing demands for spatial quality
– Validation against LRS
State Highways
City Streets/County Roads
Resource Lands Roads
Assembling the Network One County at a Time
• Collaborative effort among network data stewards
– Counties (Public Works and GIS)
– Cities
– Federal Agencies
– Public Safety Answering Points (PSAPs)
• Standards-based: Statewide Transportation
Framework Data Layer
• DOT Driven: One data source at a time
Oregon GIS Framework Data
• The effort is managed by the state GIS
coordinator
• Framework dataset exchange standards agreed-
upon for ease of exchange
• Effort involves participation by local, regional,
federal and state level agencies within Oregon.
• Fundamental geospatial data elements
• Typically statewide in extent
• Considered to be the best available data
• Intended to serve a broad range of user needs
Geoscience
Preparedness
Utilities
Climate
Bioscience
Landcover/Use
Oregon Specific
Hazards
Nationally Recognized
Geodetic Control
Aerial Imagery
Elevation
Boundaries
Hydrography
Transportation
Land Ownership
Framework Data Layers
Transportation Framework Layer: OR-Trans
• Statewide Road Centerline Layer
– Used for ARNOLD submittal
• Local data stewards provide annual updates
• ODOT integrates State, Local and Federal Road
data
• Development and maintenance funded by E-911
funding mechanism and State Planning and
Research (SPR) Funds
• Built to the Oregon Road Centerline Data
Standard
Managing the Update Process
• Four Separate Software Packages Used
– ArcGIS
– GeoMedia Pro
– SQL Server
– Feature Manipulation Engine (FME)
• Tailor the process for each data provider
• FME Workbench types
– Standardize
– Validate
– Detect Changes
– Update
Creating OR-Trans
Data FromLocal
Provider
Run Data Through FME Workbench
Preprocess Data In ArcGIS
State Hwy TransInfo TIG
Extract
Processes
Products
Typical workbench to standardize road authority’s data
Geometry change detector• Finds corresponding records with the same Local ID
• Checks to see if the geometries match
Attribute Change Detector• Finds corresponding records that have the same Local ID
• Declares match if geometry attributes also match
Creating OR-Trans
Data FromLocal
Provider
Run Data Through FME Workbench
Writes data to database
Preprocess Data In ArcGIS
GeoMedia Geometry
QA/QC
State Hwy TransInfo TIG
Extract
Processes
Products
Geometry check in GeoMedia Pro• Compares datasets to database
• Database now matches new geometries
Creating OR-Trans
Data FromLocal
Provider
Run Data Through FME Workbench
Check Functional
Class
Writes Data to database
Preprocess Data In ArcGIS
GeoMedia Geometry
QA/QC
SQL Attribute QA/QC
State Hwy TransInfo TIG
Extract
Processes
Products
SQL Server Management Studio to check attribute
information in SEG table.
Use SQL Server Management Studio to check attributes
in SEG_DESC table
Creating OR-Trans
Data FromLocal
Provider
Run Data Through FME Workbench
FME Database
Extract
Writes Data to database
Preprocess Data In ArcGIS
GeoMedia Geometry
QA/QC
QA/QCSQL Attribute
(FC)
State Hwy TransInfo TIG
Extract
Processes
OR-TransProducts
Dynamic Segmentation uses Segments to Build Routes
After Dynamic Segmentation• Final QA/QC
• If no errors, OR-Trans is ready for production use
OR-Trans Framework Layer (ARNOLD)
14_8747
33_12135
25_404
25_406
25_405
State Highway
County Roads
City Streets
Resource Lands Roads
25_0007Segment ID (Contributor -
Sequential Number)
County Line
293_9728
14_8748
293_9732
293_9731
25_402
14_963
293_9730
22_6461
22_6462
25_403
293_9729
State Highways
City Streets/County Roads
Resource Lands Roads
Creating OR-Trans
Data FromLocal
Provider
Run Data Through FME Workbench
FME Extract and Final QA/QC
Writes to Database
Preprocess Data In ArcGIS
GeoMedia Geometry
QA/QC
QA/QCSQL Attribute
(FC)State Hwy
TransInfo TIG Extract
ARNOLD
Processes OR-Trans Carto
Custom Tool
Support
OR-Trans
Products
Maintaining the Integrated Reporting
Database
Data integration and extract
Statewide
centerline data
Linear
Referencing
System
Business data
25
State Maintained
Roads
Functionally
Classified Local-
Agency Roads
Local-Agency
Roads
26
Three Linear Referencing Methods
• LRS
– Unique LRS ID, DOT
LRM used for DOT
applications
• ARNOLD Attributes
– Road Name
– Functional
Classification
– Ownership
– Facility Type
– State Code
– Year
– Source
• Summary Business Data
– Mileage
– Traffic
• Located Business Data
– Full extent HPMS
items and most
sample panels
– ODOT operational
data (e.g.
maintenance crews)
State Maintained Roads
27
• LRS
– Unique LRS ID, DOT
LRM used for DOT
applications
• ARNOLD Attributes
– Road Name
– Functional
Classification
– Ownership
– Facility Type
– State Code
– Year
– Source
• Summary Business Data
– Mileage
– Traffic
• Located Business Data
– Full extent HPMS
items and most
sample panels
State Maintained Roads
28
• LRM
– Based on FC, used
for HPMS reporting
only
• ARNOLD Attributes
– As for state
maintained Roads
• Summary Business Data
– As for state
maintained roads
• Located Business Data
– Full extent HPMS
items and some
sample panels
Functionally Classified Local-Agency RoadsFunctional Class = Collector and Above
29
• LRM
– Unique LRM ID
• ARNOLD Attributes
– As for state
maintained roads
• Summary Business Data
– As for state
maintained roads
• Located Business Data
– Growing
Local-Agency RoadsFunctional Class = Local and Rural Minor Collector
30
31
Business Data
Data integration and extracts
Business Data
Model
Annual
Update
Process
Extract
Process
Interfaces (Automated)
· Automated Time Capture
· Bridge Data System
· CHAMPS
· Crash Data System
· DFMS
· Digital Video Log (Web)
· Motor Carrier Electronic Routing (ERM)
(Vertical Clearance)
· Motor Carrier Restrictions
· RAIN (Right of Way)
· Signals
· Speed Zone
· SPMTS (Pavement Markings)
· Straightline Chart Diagrams
· Transportation Operations (TOC)
· TransViewer
Extracts (Files)
· Digital Video Log
· Pavement
· Project Delivery Work Planning
· SPIS
· TransGIS
TRANSINFO DATA FLOW (SCOPE)
Da
ta In
pu
tsIn
terf
ac
es
, E
xtr
ac
ts
& R
ep
ort
s
Da
tab
as
e
Revised 01/19/10
P = Paper
F = File
A = Automated
Construction
Plan Data
P
Field
Inventory
Sheets
P
Misc.
Boundary
Changes
P
Traffic
Count
Data
F
OTC
Actions
P
Features
Inventory
Summary
SheetsP
Maint.
Work
Force
Order InfoP
Minor
Betterment
Data
P
R/W Map
Info
P
Speed
Zone
Order
UpdatesP
Report Database In
Same Format as
Today
(HTDR1)
Other Extracts
· HPMS/Certified Mileage
· Oregon Hwy Monitoring
System
Custom
Reports
Highway Budget
Reports
Pipe
Outfalls
A
City
Limits
View/Reports (Manual)
· Aggregate Source
· Bridge Rating
· Hazardous Material
· HTCRS (Highway Traffic Condition)
· CSS (Camera Services System)
· HGIS
· PONTIS
· Sound wall Inventory
· Unstable Slope
· Water Quality Inventory
· WinVAN (Collection)
Curbed Shoulder (Miles)
Ditch (Miles)
Drainage Installation (Quantity)
Mowing Area (Acres)
Sprayable Shoulder (Miles)
Mowable Brush Shoulder (Miles)
Flashers & Beacons (Quantity)
Landscaped Area (Acres)
Fence (Miles)
Striped Lines (Miles)
Legends (Quantity)
Signs - (Quantity)
Illumination Units (Quantity)
Traffic Signals (Quantity)
Concrete Barrier (Miles)
Metal/Wood/Cable Rail (Miles)
Delineators/Mailbox Supports (Quantity)
Drawbridges (Quantity)
Pavement Markers (Quantity)
Water Quality Facility (Sq Ft)
Horizontal/Vertical Drains (Lin Ft)
Bridge Screen (Lin Ft)
Attenuators (Quantity)
Quantity = Occurrences of the feature by highway section ID
State Highway Definition (LRS, Highway Name,
Number, Begin and End)
Interstate, US and OR Route Numbers
Intersecting Road Jurisdiction
Intersecting Road Name
Engineering Stations
Classifications (Federal FC, State Highway Class.,
Scenic Byways, Etc.)
Posted Speed
Median Type
Median Width
Number Of Lanes
Lane Width
Shoulder Width
Pavement Shoulder Type
Pavement Type
Pavement Thickness
Base Type
Base Thickness
Traffic Volume
Vehicle Classification
HPMS Samples
Horizontal Curve
Vertical Grade
TransInfo
Green = In Scope
Grey = Not in Scope
TRANSINFO
DATA FLOW
(SCOPE)
(Not a complete list)
· GIS Road Network maintained at
same time as road features
· Ability to add, update, retire, and
query via both spatial and tabular
interfaces
GIS Network
· Highway Network
extracted to OR-Trans
and HwyNet monthly
Drainage Facility
Management System
(DFMS)
DFMS Tables
Stored in
TransInfo
Future Report
Database To Provide
New TransInfo Data
Other Boundaries (Parks, National Forest, Etc.)
Sign Bridges – location & type
Structures
Weigh Stations
City Limits
County Boundaries
Federal Aid Urban Boundaries
Region Boundaries
District Boundaries
Maintenance Unit Boundaries
Bicycle/Pedestrian
Guardrails
Curbs
Milepost Paddles
Signals – location of 3 color
Stormwater Facilities
http://intranet.odot.state.or.us/tdb/trandata/transinfo/
Updating TransInfo While Creating OR-Trans
Data FromLocal
Provider
Run Data Through FME Workbench
FME Extract and Final QA/QC
Writes to Database
Preprocess Data In ArcGIS
State Hwy TransInfo TIG
Extract
ARNOLD
Processes OR-Trans Carto
Custom Tool
Support
OR-Trans
Products
Integrated Enterprise Reporting Database
Integrated ARNOLD and HPMS Extract Process
Annual All Roads
Centerline Update
Business LRS Update
Annual Business
Data Update
Annual HPMS/ ARNOLD Extract
Integrated Enterprise Database
OR-Trans and GIS Products
All Roads centerline
All Roads LRS
Business data
location
Business data
Aggregated All Roads Updates
Synchronization Challenge
36
Update Centerline (Geometry,
Length)
Update LRS
(reclassify)
Update Business
Data Locations
37
Lessons Learned – You’ve Got This!
• All Roads Network Maintenance is Complicated
• Federal Reporting is Complex
• The Fewer Systems to Manage the Better
– Apply integrated enterprise approach to all
roads
Thank you.
39