Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Looking For A More Effective Way To Deliver Your Capital Facility Project?
Citation preview
Looking For A More Effective Way To Deliver Your Capital Facility Project?
To learn how KLMK Group can assist in making your capital project a success:804-343-0161 or [email protected]
Richmond, VA • Birmingham, AL • Atlanta, GA • Houston, TX • Dallas, TX
www.klmkgroup.com INTEGRATED PROJECT DELIVERY
COLLABORATION
At KLMK, we are committed to ensuring that your capital facility project is launched, managed and transitionedon time and within budget. Our services support your project from concept to completion. For 25 years, wehave been assisting clients in navigating the Capital Project Delivery Process and during thattime, we have learned exactly whatit takes to make a project successful:Trust, Innovation, Collaboration, Dedication and Commitment.
At the forefront of innovation is Integrated Project Delivery (IPD). Utilizing Lean Principles, IPD engagesthe entire team to participate in the design and development of thenew facility. This process, built ontrust and team work, eliminateswaste, improves efficiencies, and enhances communication. IPD provides an earlier and more confident definition of scope, schedule and budget which can minimize surprises during the construction phase. Delivering a project without all the frustrationtypically experienced, is the realname of the game.
Our Integrated Project Delivery services include the following:
IPD Fit Test• Review IPD Process and Standards • Assess Organizational Culture to Determine Fit
IPD Maintenance• Facilitate Pull Scheduling Sessions • Assess Team Dynamic & Relationships
IPD Launch• Define Project Scope • Facilitate Interactive Team Selection • Lead Integrated Process Planning • Negotiate Integrated Form of Agreement (IFOA)• Develop Project Implementation Plan
• Two Main Contracts (Design Team& Contractor)
• Best Understood• Linear Sequence of Work (Longest
Delivery)
• Single Contract / Responsibility• Faster Delivery• Changes Traditional Roles and
Relationships Between Owner,Contractor and Designer
• Two Main Contracts (Design Teamand Contractor)
• Linear Sequence of Work but Accommodates Fast Track Delivery
• CM is Selected on Qualifications,Not Price
• CM Selected Early in DeliveryProcess
• One Integrated Form of Agreement
• Mutual Respect and Trust• Mutual Benefit and Reward• Early Involvement of All Key
Delivery Team Members• Early Goal Definition
• Low First Cost
• Sole Source of Accountability• Increases Potential for Early
Completion• Less Adversarial• Earlier Knowledge of Firm Price
• Fosters More Collaborative Envi-ronment
• Allows for Tight Control of Pricingand Schedule
• Allows for Phased Construction• Full Disclosure of Cost and Sched-
ule Throughout Delivery Process• Reduces Owner Risk
• Owner, Architect and ContractorAct As One
• Owner Can Tailor the Best Aspectsof Design-Build and CM-At-Risk
• Shared Risk and Rewards• Allows for Reduction of Costs by
Eliminating Redundant Efforts• Delivery Relationships Changes
From Adversarial to Collaborative• Increase Ability to Deliver Project
Within Budget and Schedule• Increases Ability to Deliver a More
Operationally Efficient Facility
• Presents Highest Risk• Stimulates Adversarial
Relationships• Encourages Change Orders• Contractor Has Minimal Input
in Design
• Minimum Innovative DesignPotential
• Owner Less Involved in Design Decisions
• Owner Pushed for Earlier Decisions
• Not “Open Book” on Pricing &Level of Quality
• Perception That Price Competitionis Limited
• Design Team May Not Take InputFrom CM During Design
• Still Can Foster “Finger Pointing”Behavior
• Perception That Cost Competitiveness is Limited
• Can Be Complex to Administer• Can Require Major Culture
Change on Part of Owner, CM and Design Team
Const
ruct
ion M
anager
(CM
At
Ris
k)
Inte
gra
ted P
roje
ct D
eliv
ery (
IPD
)D
esig
n-B
uild
Des
ign-B
id-A
ward
Characteristics Pros Cons
Comparison of Project Delivery ApproachesWhy Integrated Project Delivery?
IntegratedProject
Delivery(IPD)
IND
USTRY
• Better Working Relationships
• Collaboration / Team
work
• Desire for G
reater Transparency• Risk Shifting
PRO
JECT
GO
ALS
• Re
new
ed S
crut
iny
on C
ost &
Sch
edul
e•
Inte
grat
ed P
roce
ss P
lann
ing
• In
effic
ienc
ies
in P
roje
ct D
eliv
ery
Proc
ess
MARKET DEMANDS• Improved Performance• Reimbursement Changes• Capital Constrains• Continued Margin Compression
TECHNOLOGY / PROCESS• Building information Modeling (BIM)• Lean Principles Applied to Operations, Design & Construction• Consensus Project Management Software
Trends Driving Owners Toward IPD
At KLMK, we are committed to ensuring that your capital facility project is launched, managed and transitionedon time and within budget. Our services support your project from concept to completion. For 25 years, wehave been assisting clients in navigating the Capital Project Delivery Process and during thattime, we have learned exactly whatit takes to make a project successful:Trust, Innovation, Collaboration, Dedication and Commitment.
At the forefront of innovation is Integrated Project Delivery (IPD). Utilizing Lean Principles, IPD engagesthe entire team to participate in the design and development of thenew facility. This process, built ontrust and team work, eliminateswaste, improves efficiencies, and enhances communication. IPD provides an earlier and more confident definition of scope, schedule and budget which can minimize surprises during the construction phase. Delivering a project without all the frustrationtypically experienced, is the realname of the game.
Our Integrated Project Delivery services include the following:
IPD Fit Test• Review IPD Process and Standards • Assess Organizational Culture to Determine Fit
IPD Maintenance• Facilitate Pull Scheduling Sessions • Assess Team Dynamic & Relationships
IPD Launch• Define Project Scope • Facilitate Interactive Team Selection • Lead Integrated Process Planning • Negotiate Integrated Form of Agreement (IFOA)• Develop Project Implementation Plan
• Two Main Contracts (Design Team& Contractor)
• Best Understood• Linear Sequence of Work (Longest
Delivery)
• Single Contract / Responsibility• Faster Delivery• Changes Traditional Roles and
Relationships Between Owner,Contractor and Designer
• Two Main Contracts (Design Teamand Contractor)
• Linear Sequence of Work but Accommodates Fast Track Delivery
• CM is Selected on Qualifications,Not Price
• CM Selected Early in DeliveryProcess
• One Integrated Form of Agreement
• Mutual Respect and Trust• Mutual Benefit and Reward• Early Involvement of All Key
Delivery Team Members• Early Goal Definition
• Low First Cost
• Sole Source of Accountability• Increases Potential for Early
Completion• Less Adversarial• Earlier Knowledge of Firm Price
• Fosters More Collaborative Envi-ronment
• Allows for Tight Control of Pricingand Schedule
• Allows for Phased Construction• Full Disclosure of Cost and Sched-
ule Throughout Delivery Process• Reduces Owner Risk
• Owner, Architect and ContractorAct As One
• Owner Can Tailor the Best Aspectsof Design-Build and CM-At-Risk
• Shared Risk and Rewards• Allows for Reduction of Costs by
Eliminating Redundant Efforts• Delivery Relationships Changes
From Adversarial to Collaborative• Increase Ability to Deliver Project
Within Budget and Schedule• Increases Ability to Deliver a More
Operationally Efficient Facility
• Presents Highest Risk• Stimulates Adversarial
Relationships• Encourages Change Orders• Contractor Has Minimal Input
in Design
• Minimum Innovative DesignPotential
• Owner Less Involved in Design Decisions
• Owner Pushed for Earlier Decisions
• Not “Open Book” on Pricing &Level of Quality
• Perception That Price Competitionis Limited
• Design Team May Not Take InputFrom CM During Design
• Still Can Foster “Finger Pointing”Behavior
• Perception That Cost Competitiveness is Limited
• Can Be Complex to Administer• Can Require Major Culture
Change on Part of Owner, CM and Design Team
Const
ruct
ion M
anager
(CM
At
Ris
k)
Inte
gra
ted P
roje
ct D
eliv
ery (
IPD
)D
esig
n-B
uild
Des
ign-B
id-A
ward
Characteristics Pros Cons
Comparison of Project Delivery ApproachesWhy Integrated Project Delivery?
IntegratedProject
Delivery(IPD)
IND
USTRY
• Better Working Relationships
• Collaboration / Team
work
• Desire for G
reater Transparency• Risk Shifting
PRO
JECT
GO
ALS
• Re
new
ed S
crut
iny
on C
ost &
Sch
edul
e•
Inte
grat
ed P
roce
ss P
lann
ing
• In
effic
ienc
ies
in P
roje
ct D
eliv
ery
Proc
ess
MARKET DEMANDS• Improved Performance• Reimbursement Changes• Capital Constrains• Continued Margin Compression
TECHNOLOGY / PROCESS• Building information Modeling (BIM)• Lean Principles Applied to Operations, Design & Construction• Consensus Project Management Software
Trends Driving Owners Toward IPD
Looking For A More Effective Way To Deliver Your Capital Facility Project?
To learn how KLMK Group can assist in making your capital project a success:804-343-0161 or [email protected]
Richmond, VA • Birmingham, AL • Atlanta, GA • Houston, TX • Dallas, TX
www.klmkgroup.com INTEGRATED PROJECT DELIVERY
COLLABORATION
![INTEGRATED PROJECT DELIVERY AGREEMENT · 1816211.10 [PROJECT NAME] INTEGRATED PROJECT DELIVERY AGREEMENT [Profit Deferred Until Final Completion]](https://img.pdfslide.us/doc/110x75/5f7b1be6148ce06db6337b9f/integrated-project-delivery-agreement-181621110-project-name-integrated-project.jpg)
![INTEGRATED PROJECT DELIVERY AGREEMENT...INTEGRATED PROJECT DELIVERY AGREEMENT [Profit Deferred Until Final Completion] [PROJECT NAME] ... through Final Completion of the Project. 4](https://img.pdfslide.us/doc/110x75/60068cfa91816649645b7367/integrated-project-delivery-agreement-integrated-project-delivery-agreement.jpg)
