Ge

rma

n In

stitu

te o

f U

rba

n A

ffa

irs

1

1

Jörg Thiemann-Linden

Difu – German Institute of Urban Affairs

SPECIAL Training in Berlin

on 5th September 2013

Integrated Planning Approach:

Energy & Urban Mobility?

Ge

rma

n In

stitu

te o

f U

rba

n A

ffa

irs

1

2

Zero emission mobility

expanding in Germany

Traffic-saving settlement

patterns a real option?

>> Shift in mental maps today

Pedelecs - recent tasks

for municipal planning

3

About

2

Ge

rma

n In

stitu

te o

f U

rba

n A

ffa

irs

Diversity of „cycling cultures“ in Europe …but the users‘ needs are the same

3

Deutsches Institut für Urbanistik

4

Recent Changes in Travel Habits in Germany (especially: the “young & urban“)

Absolute number of trips, Germany nationwide (urban and rural)

4

Source: MiD 2008

Ge

rma

n In

stitu

te o

f U

rba

n A

ffa

irs

Modal split of Berlin inhabitants 1998-2008

Target 2025:

car 25%

Car 2008: 32% Car 1998: 38%

PT stable 27%

Cycling 1998: 10% Cycling 2008: 13%

Walking 1998 25% Walking 2008: 28%

5

Ge

rma

n In

stitu

te o

f U

rba

n A

ffa

irs

6 6

35

14 22

29

32

21 17

29

Mitte

Fr.-

Krb

g.

Pankow

Neukölln

Treptow-Köpenick

Reinickendorf

Spandau

Charlottenbg

.-Wilmersdorf

Tempelhof-

Schbg.

Lichtenberg

Marzahn-

Hellersdorf

Steglitz-

Zehlendorf

29

17 26

28

30

13 33

23

26

8 44

22

24

12 40

23 29

13 32

26 29

12 32

27

25

11 40

25

25 6

38

30

30

7 32

32

25

9 44

21

ÖPNV gesamt (%)

Zu Fuß (%)

Fahrrad (%)

MIV gesamt

(%)

35

14 22

29

32

21 17

29

Mitte

Fr.-

Krb

g.

Pankow

Neukölln

Treptow-Köpenick

Reinickendorf

Spandau

Charlottenbg

.-Wilmersdorf

Tempelhof-

Schbg.

Lichtenberg

Marzahn-

Hellersdorf

Steglitz-

Zehlendorf

29

17 26

28

30

13 33

23

26

8 44

22

24

12 40

23 29

13 32

26 29

12 32

27

25

11 40

25

25 6

38

30

30

7 32

32

25

9 44

21

ÖPNV gesamt (%)

Zu Fuß (%)

Fahrrad (%)

MIV gesamt

(%)

Data: SrV 2008

Modal share by district 2008

public transport

walking (%)

cycling (%)

motorized private transport (%)

Ge

rma

n In

stitu

te o

f U

rba

n A

ffa

irs

Cycling 18-24 years

Elderly and young in Berlin 2002-2008

Elderly, different ages

7

Ge

rma

n In

stitu

te o

f U

rba

n A

ffa

irs

Some statistics first: modal split entire Germany 1976 – 2008 (until 1990: Western Germany only)

car driver

car,

pas-

senger .

cycling

walking

public

transpor

t

Source: BMVBS 2010, MiD 2008

Ge

rma

n In

stitu

te o

f U

rba

n A

ffa

irs

Dresden 1972 – 2008: use of travel models Cycling from 6% (1991) up to 16% (2008)

9

Ge

rma

n In

stitu

te o

f U

rba

n A

ffa

irs

Cycling modal share to rise from 10% to 15% of all trips in Germany in year 2020

Bicycle parking capacity, multimodality

Pedelecs, cycle highways

Focus also on rural mobility

Difu involved (giving advice to ministry, conducting experts‘ / public consultation)

450 suggestions on nat. cycling strategy from cycling experts during cycling policy conference in 2011

10

Adopted on 5th September 2012:

New National Cycling Plan

Ge

rma

n In

stitu

te o

f U

rba

n A

ffa

irs

11 Source: German National Cycling Plan 2002-2012

11

Ge

rma

n In

stitu

te o

f U

rba

n A

ffa

irs

12

Conference

Crosstown links (1 day)

maintenance (1 day)

cycling as a system (2 days)

safety (2 days)

excursion to DK ( 3 days)

Difu

Germany‘s Bicycle Academy System

Training and education

focussed on staff from

municipalities, police and

administration

3-4 speakers/teachers per day

2007-2012:

~ 100 Seminars, 6 Excursions, 6 other

events , more than 6000 participants

+ 5 National networking conferences

for municipal staff (only)

Program Locations in a typical year

12

Ge

rma

n In

stitu

te o

f U

rba

n A

ffa

irs

Some first big „non infrastructure“ projects

13

Funding from NRVP and international emission trading at ca. 1 Mio. € / a

100 companies‘ advice in Mobility Management („effizient mobil“)

„Cycling Capital Munich“ campaign

Zero CO2 by active mobility („Kopf an, Motor aus“: „Turn brain on; engine off“)

Tendering of bike sharing in Hamburg

Many other middle size „NRVP projects“…

13

Ge

rma

n In

stitu

te o

f U

rba

n A

ffa

irs

Keeping the potential

by sound infrastructure

• Quick and easy travel on bike lanes, cheaper than build cycle paths

• Adequate space at intersections

• Safe self-explanatory design

• Enforcement, no car parking on it

• Designed after new guidelines („ERA 2010“)

14

Ge

rma

n In

stitu

te o

f U

rba

n A

ffa

irs

Traditional and recent street design

according to new guidelines („RASt 06“)

Car volumes

Width of

carriageway

Width of (residual)

side spaces

Dimensioning from urban layout

Width of side spaces

Width of Carriageway

Compromise,

political decision

Street designing OLD Street designing NEW

Source: Harald Heinz (2007):

Straßenraumgestaltung mit den RASt 06.

In: Straßenverkehrstechnik 10/2007.

Extention K.J. Beckmann.,

„… layout of the street from the

roadside, not from the middle

(carriageway) “

15

Ge

rma

n In

stitu

te o

f U

rba

n A

ffa

irs

16

Ascain the best possible street cross section

16

Ge

rma

n In

stitu

te o

f U

rba

n A

ffa

irs

Pedestrian mobility needs non-mobility

17

Ge

rma

n In

stitu

te o

f U

rba

n A

ffa

irs

18

For hot days – the north learning from the south

18

Ge

rma

n In

stitu

te o

f U

rba

n A

ffa

irs

Shared Space in technical

guidelines for Germany

19

Ge

rma

n In

stitu

te o

f U

rba

n A

ffa

irs

20

Peaceful together in the square („Shared Space“) Metz (FR), Duisburg (DE), London (UK), Baar (CH)

Ge

rma

n In

stitu

te o

f U

rba

n A

ffa

irs

Since begin of 2013 Expertise Network by

SRL Urban Planners Profess. Assoc.

VCD Consumers‘ Club Transport & Env.

ADFC Cycling Advocacy Club

FUSS Pedestrians‘ Association

www.netzwerk-sharedspace.de

1st Conference on 10th September 2013 in Munich „Gestaltung verbindet“ (Street Design Connecting Disciplines)

21

Ge

rma

n In

stitu

te o

f U

rba

n A

ffa

irs

22

„Leipzig Charta“ of the EU Ministers for

Urban Development / Housing / Infrastructure (2007)

Integration of urban develpment and urban transport policy (

44, 46)

• Accessibility a right of the people

• Deprived neighbourhoods in focus

• Public transport at affordable price

• Networks for walking and cycling

To substitite the

Athens Charta

from the 1930ies

based on

separation

in land use

22

Ge

rma

n In

stitu

te o

f U

rba

n A

ffa

irs

Long distance way of life the personal „Metropolis á la carte“, linked by motorways and high

motorisation

23

Quelle: Komunalverband Ruhr

Gertz 2010

23

Ge

rma

n In

stitu

te o

f U

rba

n A

ffa

irs

Short trip way of life

Re-discover the near-by,

bringing facilities within walking

distance back on the mental map

of consumers and polititians

www.active-access.eu

Gertz 2010

„Nahmobilität“:

Action plan of the Governor of

Northrhine-Westfalia to encourage

short-distance mobility

(walking and cycling)

24

Ge

rma

n In

stitu

te o

f U

rba

n A

ffa

irs

Affordable mobility

after „peak oil“?? Transport expenditures (family)

- urban / rural?

- short / long distance regions?

- municipality depending from

long distance commuting?

- dropping prices of houses?

>> calculate housing vs.

(future transport costs!)

25

Ge

rma

n In

stitu

te o

f U

rba

n A

ffa

irs

26

„Wo-Mo-Calculator“: Transparency of housing+transport

costs in Hamburg agglomeration

„WoMo-Rechner“ 2009, TU Hamburg-Harburg

26

Deutsches Institut für Urbanistik

Re-cycling of land-use: former military baracks

Area in cycling distance to city center: >> dense >> mixed use >> quality green spaces

End of tramline extension

Natual water regime

High „solar standards“

Parking concentrated outside in two garages

27

Near-by-district

Freiburg,“Vauban

27

Ge

rma

n In

stitu

te o

f U

rba

n A

ffa

irs

28

Implementation in Tübingen

„French Quarter“ and „Loretto Quarter“

28

Ge

rma

n In

stitu

te o

f U

rba

n A

ffa

irs

29

Traffic effects of a shopping mall, Sihlcity, Zürich

…. minimized by

• innovative building permit /

reduced parking (trip contingent),

• brilliant mobility management

(home delivery)

Compared to another Zürich mall

• same economic success

• car only 35% instead of 80%

modal share

Source: Sihlcity

29

Ge

rma

n In

stitu

te o

f U

rba

n A

ffa

irs

Houten near Utrecht

urban planning after cycling

30

Ge

rma

n In

stitu

te o

f U

rba

n A

ffa

irs

Prototype commuter railway station Houten, NL (2011); 50,000 inhabitants

3200 bicycles capacity in „station hall“

31

31

Ge

rma

n In

stitu

te o

f U

rba

n A

ffa

irs

Cycle Highways in the Netherlands to reduce peak our work load in public transport and roads

32

Ge

rma

n In

stitu

te o

f U

rba

n A

ffa

irs

Bike Sharing (capacity restraints, lacking quality in PT?)

33

rental network

for leisure

personal bike

at home

public city bike

„PT bicycle“

for last mile

to work

33

Ge

rma

n In

stitu

te o

f U

rba

n A

ffa

irs

Rising passenger numbers in urban public transport

>> Cycling to moderate work load during peak hour

34 34

Ge

rma

n In

stitu

te o

f U

rba

n A

ffa

irs

35

Long life cycles of infrastructure for a year 2050 post-fossile era with diversity of electric vehicles?

35

Ge

rma

n In

stitu

te o

f U

rba

n A

ffa

irs

in Mio VSF 2012

in 100.000 / a

36

D e

u t

s c

h e

s

I n

s t

i t u

t

f ü

r

U

r b

a n

i s

t i k

37

In future a high proportion of electric bicycles?

37

Ge

rma

n In

stitu

te o

f U

rba

n A

ffa

irs

2050

Pedelec-

Szenario

Long term mobility scenarios for Münster 2050

(all kilometers driven within city boundaries)

0

Argus/Difu 2010; Abbildungsquelle: Hartmut Topp, „Städtische Mobilität ohne

Emissionen – eine Vision?, 8./9.09.2011 S. 13.

38

Pedelecs for car based in-commuters into cycling based inner-cities

(like in the city of Münster)

car

p.t.

38

Ge

rma

n In

stitu

te o

f U

rba

n A

ffa

irs

New project in the Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Region on

rural e-mobility (Wismar Highschool of Applied Sciences)

Rural Pedelec Sharing Project feeder system to bus service (each 2nd hour)

+

Walking 1 km

=Bicycle 2,5 km

=Pedelec 4 km

39

Ge

rma

n In

stitu

te o

f U

rba

n A

ffa

irs

Cycling Based European Project CityLog in Berlin

40

Source: SenStadtUm Berlin / J. Menge

Ge

rma

n In

stitu

te o

f U

rba

n A

ffa

irs

new: challenge of bicycle parking quantities

in dense housing areas

41 41

Ge

rma

n In

stitu

te o

f U

rba

n A

ffa

irs

Ideas for charging & anti-theft facilities in cities

Pedelecs‘ different needs compared to e-cars (charging, theft?

Issues of safe parking volumes in urban areas

„Solar filling station“ in protected environment?

New ideas for „e-lock“ combination

42 42

Ge

rma

n In

stitu

te o

f U

rba

n A

ffa

irs

Pedelec sound infrastructure – in „shop-window e-mobility Berlin“

„500 Pedelecs substitute commuter cars“

Quicker cycle routes

Safe parking at S-Bahn stations

Mobility management in companies

www.nrvp.de/pedelec/schaufensterprojekt

43

Ge

rma

n In

stitu

te o

f U

rba

n A

ffa

irs

44

„Cycling Expertise“ files on www.nrvp.de/en/cye

(40 files for download, newsletter in English)

44

Ge

rma

n In

stitu

te o

f U

rba

n A

ffa

irs

45

Ge

rma

n In

stitu

te o

f U

rba

n A

ffa

irs

Sustainable Urban

Mobility Plans SUMP www.mobilityplans.eu

… in future an integration

with Sustainable Energy

Action Plans (SEAP)?

- similar visions, objectives

- overlapping stakeholder

constellations

- both supported by IEE

www.managenergy.net

46

Ge

rma

n In

stitu

te o

f U

rba

n A

ffa

irs

47

Jörg Thiemann-Linden

++49.30.39001-138

thiemann-linden@difu.de

Difu – German Institute of Urban Affairs

Zimmerstrasse 13-15, 10969 Berlin

Thank you

for your attention.

47