Upload
amy-weeks
View
29
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Instrumental Conditioning II. What is learned?. Reinforcement “stamps in” this connection. Thorndike:. S. R. What is learned?. Edwin Guthrie: Contiguity theory, reinforcement doesn’t do much of anything (directly). S. R. O. What is learned?. S. R. ?. 2-Process Theory. operant. O. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Instrumental Conditioning II
S R
What is learned?
Thorndike:Reinforcement “stamps in” this connection
S R
What is learned?
Edwin Guthrie: Contiguity theory, reinforcement doesn’t do much of anything (directly)
S R
O
What is learned?
?
S R O
2-Process Theory
operant
Pavlovian
S R
CR
2-Process Theory
operant
Pavlovian
Evidence for 2-process theoryPavlovian-Instrumental Transfer
Phase 1 Phase 2 Test
LeverO LightO Light: Lever?No CS: Lever?
# Presses
Light No CS
S R O?
?
What is learned?
SO
Trapold
Phase 1 Phase 2 Test
R LeverPellet TonePellet Tone:Left? Right?
L LeverSucrose LightSucrose Light:Left? Right?
# Presses
Light Noise
Left
Right
ROColwill & Rescorla (1986)
Phase 1 Devaluation Test
Push LeftPellet Pellet+LiCl Right?
Push RightSucrose Sucrose+LiCl Left?
What is a reinforcer?
Operational Definition (behaviorists): That which increases the probability of the response that preceded it.
Thorndike: A stimulus that produces a “satisfying state of affairs”
Can we be more precise?
The Drive-Reduction hypothesis
Servomechanism: device that maintains a controlled variable within a set range
Drive Reduction Theory
Amt of H2O in body
Set Point
Seek water/ don’t seek water
drives
Drive Reduction Considered: Are reinforcers necessary for survival?
– Sensory stimulation is a reinforcer• Monkeys work for visual access
– Eating to excess
– Drugs of Abuse
– “Pleasure centers” of the brain
Behavioral Regulation View: The Premack Principle
• Behaviors are reinforcing, not stimuli
• To predict what will be reinforcing, observe the baseline frequency of different behaviors
• Highly probable behaviors will reinforce less probable behaviors
Premack Revised: The Response Deprivation Hypothesis
• Timberlake & Allison (1974)
• Low frequency behaviors can reinforce high frequency behaviors
• All behaviors have a preferred frequency
• Deprivation below that frequency is aversive.