11
Instructor Performance Summary Prepared for: Carrie Williams Jun 01, 2015 – Jun 30, 2015 Report Date: Jul 07, 2015 Report Run By: [email protected] Benchmark: Only my company

InstructorPerformanceSummary__Carrie_Williams

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: InstructorPerformanceSummary__Carrie_Williams

Instructor Performance Summary Prepared for: Carrie WilliamsJun 01, 2015 – Jun 30, 2015

Report Date: Jul 07, 2015

Report Run By: [email protected]

Benchmark: Only my company

Page 2: InstructorPerformanceSummary__Carrie_Williams

ContentsSummary.....................................................................................................................................................3

Top/Bottom Analysis...................................................................................................................................5

Trend Analysis.............................................................................................................................................7

Qualitative Feedback...................................................................................................................................9

Next Steps.................................................................................................................................................10

Appendix – Report Criteria........................................................................................................................11

2

Page 3: InstructorPerformanceSummary__Carrie_Williams

Summary

Performance by Instructor Question Category:

The graph below ranks learner satisfaction for each of the questions within the Instructor question category, represented by the percent of learners that selected the top two response options. The benchmark can help you gauge relative performance. The questions at the top of the list represent areas in which your learners are most satisfied, whereas those at the bottom may represent areas for improvement.

The instructor provided real-world experiences and examples. (N=40)

The instructor was knowledgeable about the subject. (N=40)

Instructor overall (N=41)

Participants were encouraged to take part in class discussions. (N=41)

The instructor''s presentation skills were adequate. (N=41)

0 20 40 60 80 100

Instructor Question Category Ranking

Percent Selection of Top Two Box Only my company Benchmark

3

Page 4: InstructorPerformanceSummary__Carrie_Williams

Performance vs. Benchmark:

The graph below displays the difference, in percentage points, between top-two box selections for your learners vs. the benchmark. Positive numbers indicate that your learner satisfaction for that question exceeded the benchmark, and negative numbers indicate learners were less satisfied in that area than the benchmark. This graph should help you highlight your successes, as well as prioritize areas for improvement.

Instructor overall (N=41)

Participants were encouraged to take part in class discussions. (N=41)

The instructor''s presentation skills were adequate. (N=41)

The instructor provided real-world experiences and examples. (N=40)

The instructor was knowledgeable about the subject. (N=40)

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

0

0

0

0

0

Difference from Only my company

4

Page 5: InstructorPerformanceSummary__Carrie_Williams

Top/Bottom AnalysisThis section displays your top and bottom performing courses and classes. Each graph displays the top performers first, followed by the bottom performers. When analyzing performance, remember to consider the number of evaluations collected to determine if action is warranted.

Top/Bottom Courses:

The graph below shows your top and bottom courses filtered to the Instructor question category from the Post Event evaluation. Use the highest-rated courses to understand your successes. Review the lowest-rated courses to determine approaches for improving performance.

This chart could not be generated, because there is no data in your account for this date range that matches the parameters of the chart. This may be due to the questions on your evaluations or the types of training being measured. For additional information, please refer to the User Guide for this report or contact us at [email protected].

5

Page 6: InstructorPerformanceSummary__Carrie_Williams

Top/Bottom Classes:

The graph below shows your top and bottom classes filtered to the Instructor question category from the Post Event evaluation. Note that classes are individual instances of courses, taught on a specific date. Use the highest-rated classes to understand your successes. Review the lowest-rated classes to identify opportunities for improving class ratings in the future.

This chart could not be generated, because there is no data in your account for this date range that matches the parameters of the chart. This may be due to the questions on your evaluations or the types of training being measured. For additional information, please refer to the User Guide for this report or contact us at [email protected].

6

Page 7: InstructorPerformanceSummary__Carrie_Williams

Trend AnalysisThe graphs below display trends based on ratings and number of post-event evaluations. Use these graphs to monitor progress toward goals and identify changes in your performance or activity that warrant further investigation.

Activity Trend:

The trend below shows the number of Post Event evaluations collected for at least six months for each Learning Methodology. This can be used to understand the number of learners you are impacting, and may help you pinpoint where response rates are lower than anticipated. These activity trends can also provide the context for interpreting the subsequent Performance Trend report.

Jan 2015

Feb 2015

Mar 2015

Apr 2015

May 2015

Jun 2015

05

1015202530354045

Activity Trend by Learning Methodology

Instructor Led

7

Page 8: InstructorPerformanceSummary__Carrie_Williams

Performance Trend:

The graph below displays a monthly trend of the overall Post Event average of the Courseware, Instructor and Job Impact question categories. Improvements in your performance as an instructor should result in the Instructor average trend line moving up. Downward trends warrant review and could indicate opportunities for improvement in delivering certain courses or to specific segments of learners.

Impacting job performance is the primary goal of most training. The degree to which this is achieved can be heavily influenced by the instructor’s ability to deliver the courseware. By providing on-the-job examples and encouraging discussion and practice in class, the instructor can improve the perception of the courseware quality and ultimately the job impact of the training. If the Courseware and Job Impact trend lines are lower than your Instructor trend line, consider ways that you could change your facilitation to improve those areas.

Jan 2015

Feb 2015

Mar 2015

Apr 2015

May 2015

Jun 2015

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Performance Trend By Question Category

Courseware Instructor

8

Page 9: InstructorPerformanceSummary__Carrie_Williams

Qualitative FeedbackThe comments below are extracted from the highest and lowest rated classes displayed in the Top/Bottom Classes section. These comments should be used to gain insight into the reasons behind the quantitative feedback provided by learners on their experience. Use this data with other reports to determine what is working well, as well as areas for improvement.

This chart could not be generated, because there is no data in your account for this date range that matches the parameters of the chart. This may be due to the questions on your evaluations or the types of training being measured. For additional information, please refer to the User Guide for this report or contact us at [email protected].

9

Page 10: InstructorPerformanceSummary__Carrie_Williams

Next StepsInvestigate Further:

In Metrics that Matter®, you have a number of reports available for investigating the results you see in this report. Here are a few suggestions to get you started:

Quick Question: Filter to a single element (course, instructor, demographic) and include comments to identify strengths and opportunities for improvement. In the Set Preferences area, you can set this report to deliver to you automatically after each class.

Crosstab: Use this report to compare the results of one item by another to pinpoint specific areas for improvement. For example, run a Crosstab report by Course vs. Question Category to see what aspects of each course are rated high or low.

Identify Development Opportunities:

Use the results in this report for continuous improvement and self-development. Be aware of specific areas of instruction that you can improve upon, such as demonstrating knowledge of the subject matter or keeping the learners engaged throughout the class. If there are courses for which you are less skilled at facilitating, find other instructors who have had success in teaching those courses and talk about best practices or audit a class with them.

Communicate Successes:

Share the results with your manager or employer and discuss ways to further leverage your strengths.

10

Page 11: InstructorPerformanceSummary__Carrie_Williams

Appendix – Report Criteria

No Filters have been selected for the report.

11