Upload
anabel-leemon
View
214
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Institutional RepositoriesInstitutional Repositories
WorkshopWorkshop
Universiteit Maastricht4 October 2006
AgendaAgendaMorning
• Nereus• EO: “Economists Online”• NEEO: “Network of European Economists Online”
• EO interoperability• EO requirements• Proposed solution for DSpace users:
DISpace@ULB
• DISpace@ULB - interoperable with NEEO, …
• DISpace@ULB – DISpace1.0
AgendaAgendaAfternoon
• Overview of the various aspects of an IR implementation and its integration into the institution’s research environment
• 6 topics:• Choosing an IR software• Metadata and complex objects• Submission workflow and versioning• User-friendly submission interfaces• Towards a European standardization through the
DRIVER project ?• Bridging “publication” repositories with “data”
repositories
Nereus – IR softwareNereus – IR softwareNereus Institution IR softwareTilburg University (NL) ARNO
Universiteit Maastricht (NL) ARNO
University of Warwick (UK) Digital Commons (Proquest)
University College London (UK) Digitool (ExLibris) (from Eprints)
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (B) DSpace
Sciences Po (F) DSpace
Université Libre de Bruxelles (B) DSpace
Carlos III de Madrid (ES) DSpace
Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam (NL) DSpace/Hybrid
University College Dublin (IRL) DSpace? (from Fedora)
London School of Economics (UK) Eprints (going to Fedora?)
Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration (A)
Epub
University of Oxford (UK) Fedora
Charles University CERGE-EI (CZ) OLIB (Fretwell Downing)
German National Library of Economics (D) OPUS
Université Toulouse 1 Sciences Sociales (F) ORI
Participants – IR Participants – IR softwaresoftware
Institution IR softwareTilburg University (NL) ARNO
Universiteit Maastricht (NL) ARNO
Carlos III University of Madrid SPAIN (ES)
DSpace
Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam (NL) DSpace
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (B) DSpace
Universiteit Antwerpen (B) DSpace
Universiteit Gent (B) DSpace
Universiteit Hasselt (B) DSpace
Université Libre de Bruxelles (B) DSpace
University of Cambridge (UK) DSpace
London School of Economics (UK) EPrints
CNRS (F) HAL
KNAW (NL) KNAW software
Charles University in Prague, CERGE (CZ)
OLIB
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (B) VUBIS software
Institutional RepositoriesInstitutional Repositories
WorkshopWorkshop
NereusNereus
EOEO
NEEONEEO
The Nereus network The Nereus network 16 partners -- 9 countries16 partners -- 9 countries
The Nereus missionThe Nereus mission
• A network of libraries and institutions serving the economics community
• Institutions with high-rankings in economics
• Serving our clients by:– increasing visibility of their research – building added value services
• Serving the network by: – focussing on cost-efficiency and innovation– developing concrete products– maximising on knowledge-exchange structures
• Comprehensive index of electronic resources in economics
• Make economics and social sciences datasets more easily accessible
• Participation in JISC funded project : VERSIONS
• Feed the Sherpa/Romeo database with self-archiving and copyright policies of publishers
• Institutional repositories:– EO– NEEO
Current Nereus Current Nereus activitiesactivities
• Online access to the academic output of leading economists
• Outcome:– Search the publications of some of Europe’s
excellent economists– Dynamic publications list per participating
author, with full text links to final articles and open access content
• Figures: – Participating institutions: 6– Authors: 70– Bib. references: 7000– Open access FT: 2700
• Available at http://nereus.uvt.nl/eo _
EOEO
• Extend EO to all Nereus partners:– 16 institutions / 500 authors– + current academic output
• Increase quality of existing EO services, through:– Use of MPEG21/DIDL as metadata exchange format– Automated metadata enrichment
• New services:– Usage statistics– FT searching– Multilinguality– Integration with CKB– Version signposting tool– RSS feeds– …
• Obtain funding from EC through eContentPlus programme
NEEONEEO
Institutional RepositoriesInstitutional Repositories
WorkshopWorkshop
Implementing an institutional Implementing an institutional repositoryrepository
Aspects of IR implementation
Project plan• Implementation plan
• Technical installation and developments• Copyright issues• Interoperability considerations (metadata
schemes, OAI, SRU)• Testing (including research community)• Added-value services
• Communication plan• Awareness raising: authorities, research
community, libraries• Making research community interested in the
concept of Open Access
• Business plan
Aspects of IR implementation
Integrating an IR in a university research environment• Seamless upload of documents to IR from
desktop publishing tools • Making central IR system live together with
central Research Management System• Making central IR system live together with
the several local researcher initiatives• Institutional bibliography as opposed to
institutional repository
Aspects of IR implementation
Submission workflow• Metadata validation
• Self-archiving + verification of (part of?) metadata by library
• Archiving done by library
• Scientific value• Should submitted items be validated by
faculty? How do you organise this?• Should deletions from IR be checked by
faculty?
Aspects of IR implementation
IR functionalities• Authentication of submitters• Unambiguous identification of (co-)authors
• Institutional / national DAI• Collection structure of an IR
• Per faculty? Per department?• Multi-institution
• Maintaining a bibliography• Not just deposit, but also edit and delete
• Classification of documents• Discipline-based ontologies• “funding body” ontologies
• Integrate authority lists / files• Ingest from external resources
• Offline• Online
• Automated enhancement of metadata• Versioning, relationships, accessibility of:
• Object files of an item• Different items
• De-duplication of items• Intra-IR• Inter-IR
Aspects of IR implementation
Content dissemination• Integration of publications list into
researcher’s CVs• Export toolkit (reference format, filters on
document types, filters on metadata fields, sort, output format (XML, CSV, HTML,…) )
• Integration into PBMS (EndNote, RefWorks, BibTex,…)
• Integrate into web pages (researcher, department, university bibliography,…)
• Integrate into library portal• Automated propagation of metadata to:
• discipline-based repositories• Google(s)
• Overlay journals