73
Institutional Repositories : An Overview Smita Chandra Librarian Indian Institute of Geomagnetism [email protected]

Institutional repositories

  • Upload
    smtcd

  • View
    387

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

2. What is a Repository? Open access digital archive on open source software A managed, persistent way of making research, learning and teachingcontent with continuing value both discoverable and accessible Repositories can be subject or institutional in their focus Putting content into an institutional repository enables staff andinstitutions to manage and preserve it, and therefore derive maximumvalue from it A repository can support research, learning, and administrativeprocesses. They are commonly used for open access research outputs 3. What is an institutional repository?Clifford Lynch, Executive Director, Coalition for Networked Information, statedIn my view, a university-based institutional repository is a set ofservices that a university offers to the members ofits community for the management and dissemination of digitalmaterials created by the institution and its community members. It ismost essentially an organizational commitment to the stewardship ofthese digital materials, including long-term preservation whereappropriate, as well as organization and access or distribution. ARL: A Bimonthly Report, no. 226 (February 2003) Institutional Repositories: Essential Infrastructure for Scholarship in theDigital Age http://www.arl.org/resources/pubs/br/br226/br226ir.shtml 4. Open Access Institutional RepositoriesWhat is open access (OA)?Many definitions a report from the Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC) in the UK of 2006 stated:The Open Access research literature is composed of free, onlinecopies of peer-reviewed journal articles and conference papers aswell as technical reports, theses and working papers. In mostcases there are no licensing restrictions on their use byreaders. They can therefore be used freely for research, teachingand other purposes.(http://www.jisc.ac.uk/publications/publications/pub_openaccess_v2.aspx)An Open access institutional repository is that repository where arecontents are freely available for use. 5. What OA is not ? There are various misunderstandings about OpenAccess. It is not self-publishing, nor a way to bypasspeer-review and publication, nor is it a kind of second-class, cut-price publishing route. It is simply a meansto make research results freely available online tothe whole research community. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/publications/briefingpapers/2006/pub_openaccess_v2.aspx 6. Gold and Green OA publishingGold OA - uses a funding model that does not charge readers or their institutions for access e.g. Ariadne, D- Lib Magazine and First MondayGreen OA - authors publish papers in one of the 25,000 or so refereed journals in all disciplines and then self- archive these papers in open access/digital/institutional repositories. 7. Institutional Repositories are:Centered around a university (other academic institution) andcontain items which are the scholarly output of thatinstitutionA collection of (digital) objects, in a variety of formatsInclude works of various degrees of scholarly authority andfrom various stages in the process of scholarly inquiry. Inaddition to published works, an IR may include preprints, theses& dissertations, images, data sets, working papers, coursematerial, or anything else a contributor depositsTypically motivated by a commitment to open access 8. Institutional RepositoriesInstitutions are logical implementers of repositoriesbecause they can take responsibility for:Centralising a distributed activityFramework and InfrastructurePermanence that can sustain changesStewardship of Digital assetsPreservation policy for long term accessProvide central digital showcase for the research, teaching and scholarship of the institution 9. IRs & Digital LibrariesInstitutional Repositories Digital Libraries Are organized around a May be built around any number ofparticular institutional organizing principles (often topic,communitysubject, or discipline) Often are dependent upon the Are the product of a deliberatevoluntary contribution ofcollection development policymaterials by scholars for thecontent in their collection Typically include an important Are mainly repositories andservice aspect (reference andtherefore may only offer limited research assistance, interpretiveuser servicescontent, or special resources.) 10. How does an IR content differ from other digital collections? Content is deposited in a repository by contentcreator, owner etc. Repository architecture manages the content andthe metadata Repository software offers a minimum set of basicservices put, get, search Repository must be sustainable, trusted, well-supported and well-managed Heery, R. and Anderson S. (2005) Digital RepositoriesReview. UKOLN and AHDS. Available at:http://www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded_documents/digital-repositories-review-2005.pdf 11. Origins & DevelopmentOpen Archives Initiative-Protocol for MetadataHarvesting (OAI-PMH)Digital Library 12. Why? university view An institutional repository is a tangible indicatorof research output of a university thus increasingits visibility, prestige and public value Repository content is readily searchable bothlocally and globally Can be used as a marketing tool for the institution Allows an institution to manage its IntellectualProperty Rights appropriately 13. Why? funders view Funders see improved access to, and widerdissemination of research For example, in the UK the eight researchcouncils have adopted policies mandating thatresults from their tax-payer funded research beopen, available and accessible to all via IRs orsimilar subject repositories e.g. Economic and Social Research Council http://www.esrc.ac.uk/_images/Full_text_decision_tree_tcm8-4138.pdf/ 14. IRs can be used for: Scholarly communication Storing learning materials and coursework Managing collections of research documents Preserving digital materials for the long term Knowledge management Electronic publishing Research assessment exercise Collaboration tool 15. Benefits of setting up an institutionalrepositoryFor researchers Showcase your institutes output Increases citation for authors 24-hour access through any web-enabled device Lifes work in one location Satisfies funders mandates Persistent URLsFor librarians Provides new ways for archiving & preserving valuable work Time-saving and cost-effective Help to identify trends Reduce duplication of records 16. More BenefitsFor the university An effective marketing tool Increase the visibility, reputation and prestige Greater interdisciplinary research Enhanced funding Facilitates gathering data such as publications for AssessmentsFor the global community Free access of scholarly information Taxpayers fund a large amount of scientific research Developing countries Increase public knowledge Gain access to a wide variety of materials 17. Publication and Deposition 18. Publication and DepositionAuthor writes paper 19. Publication and DepositionAuthor writes paper Submits to journal 20. Publication and DepositionAuthor writes paper Submits to journal Deposits in e-printrepository 21. Publication and DepositionAuthor writes paper Submits to journal Deposits in e-printrepository Paper is refreed 22. Publication and DepositionAuthor writes paper Submits to journal Deposits in e-printrepository Paper is refreedRevised by author 23. Publication and DepositionAuthor writes paper Submits to journal Deposits in e-printrepository Paper is refreedRevised by authorAuthor submits final version 24. Publication and DepositionAuthor writes paper Deposits in e-print Submits to journal repository Paper is refreedRevised by authorAuthor submits final version 25. What type of content can be deposited in an Institutional Repository? Faculty Pre-prints, post-prints, research findings, working papers, technical reports, conference papers Multimedia, videos, teaching materials, learning objects Data sets (scientific, demographic, etc.) and other ancillary research material Web-based presentations, exhibits, etc. Students Theses and dissertations Projects and portfolios Awarded research Performances and recitals 26. Starting & Maintaining an IRSteps to Building an IR1. Justify the relevance to the institution and contributors2. Develop a policy framework. How will we find this content and what will we do with it?3. Build the infrastructureBonus: Get institutional support and a mandate. 27. Starting & Maintaining an IRIR Technology IR software (Open Source/Commercial) OAI-PMH harvesting protocol/software (Free) Intel/Pentium servers for IR Linux/Red Hat OS, MySQL/PostGre DBMS, Apache/Tomcat web server, Perl/Java (Free) 28. Starting & Maintaining an IRCore issues Policy Decisions Organizational Issues Cultural Issues 29. Starting & Maintaining an IRPolicy decisions Scope : Reinforce the repositorys active support for theinstitutions mission, values and goals- Identify/build a context in which the repository is necessary- Multidiscipline / single subject /Entire research output/database for each functional unit Types of documents- Single database for different types /single one Software: OSS like DSpace or GNU Eprints or develop own Research Deposit Types: Thesis, Journal articles, Preprints, Reports, Conference papers, Book Chapter, etc Resources: Human, IT, Funding Stake holders: Library, Each Department, Institute as a whole Services : Focus on building services not collections 30. Starting & Maintaining an IR Management and Organizational Issues Deposit options-Researcher self deposit and /or assisted deposit- Metadata quality - Ensuring quality and rich metadata is labour intensive Digitization: Born digital / Scanning File formats: Accept all, Only PDF and/or other, Conversion Only full text database and/or Bibliographic Copyright: RoMeO Publishers Copyright policies Quality assurance: Peer review, Editing Deposit Agreement and Use Agreement- Depositors declaration: Non-exclusive license - Copyright/Patent/Trademarks- Repositorys rights and responsibilities: Distribute, Store, Migrate, CopyRearrange, Remove- Use Agreement: Copy, Distribute, Display, Share, Author credit 31. Starting & Maintaining an IRCultural Issues Advocacy- Sensitive to organizational culture and background- Community size- Strategy: stakeholders, management committees Copyright- Concern of researchers, Legal department Positioning- Library/Institute Website 32. Starting & Maintaining an IRKey Issues: Faculty buy-in Submission polices Copyright issues Deposit types Metadata OAI-PMH compliant systems Specialized staff Outreach and Liaison services 33. Obstacles to building a repository in-house Open source institutional repository software is free to acquire butexpensive to implement Delays due to slow response times from over-burdened IT services Lack of personnel with the correct skills Projects often go on for much longer than necessary Other priorities can crop up unexpectedly and divert resources awayfrom the repository project 34. Four Widely Used SystemsProduced by Berkeley Electronic Press (bepress), focused on maintainingscholarly output. Not open source.Developed at the University of Southampton (UK). Widely considered to bethe least complex of the major repository software platforms. Developed at Cornell and University of Virginia. Based on a framework known as the Flexible Extensible Digital Object and Repository Framework. Designed by MIT and Hewlett-Packard to manage the intellectual output of research institutions and provide for long-term preservation. 35. Subject/Discipline Based Repositories Definition : Subject repositories are archives which collect and manage material relating to one or more related subject areas. A number currently exist mainly within science subjects.Subject repositories often managed by an individualfor a group 36. Subject/Discipline Based Repositories Relies on peer interaction no mandate Individual agreements have to be struck No definitive boundaries Quality control issues Sustainability issues Transitory collection at risk Responsibility for preservation Issues over the return on the money and effortinvested 37. Subject/Discipline Based RepositoriesSignificant subject repositories include many using e-Prints or DSpacesoftware: ArXiv - http://www.arxiv.cornell.edu/ (physics, mathematics, non-linear science and computer science) Cogprints - http://cogprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/ (Cognitive sciencesincluding psychology, neuroscience, linguistics and other related areas) CiteSeer - http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/cs (computer science) HTP Prints - http://htpprints.yorku.ca/ (History and theory of psychology) PubMedCentral - http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/ (US NationalLibrary of Medicines digital archive of life sciences journal literature. PhilSci Archive - http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/ (philosophy of science) E-LIS - http://eprints.rclis.org/ (library and information science) RePEc (Research Papers in Economics) 38. How Does an IR Work?The Open Archival Information System (OAIS) 39. How Does an IR Work?Submission and Ingestion contributor metadata formatting CopyrightPost-Submission quality metadata (DC) Intellectual Property issuesUser QueryOngoing workflows Preservation Administration Data Management System customization 40. OpenDOAR Directory of Open AccessRepositories The OpenDOAR service provides a quality-assuredlisting of open access repositories around theworld. OpenDOAR staff harvest and assignmetadata to allow categorisation and analysis toassist the wider use and exploitation ofrepositories. Each of the repositories has beenvisited by OpenDOAR staff to ensure a high degreeof quality and consistency in the informationprovided: OpenDOAR is maintained by SHERPAconsortium staff at the University of Nottingham,UK http://www.opendoar.org/about.html 41. Growth of OpenDOAR-Worldwide 42. Benefits in depositing material Increase in citations, impact and usage (useful forresearch evaluations such as the planned ResearchEvaluation Framework in UK in 2013) Increase in public research profile both for theindividual as well as the institution Preservation of research outputs from the institution 43. ROAR- Registry of Open Access RepositoriesAims to monitor overall growth in the number of eprintarchives and to maintain a list of GNU EPrints sites(http://roar.eprints.org)Available from Southampton University, UKData gathered automatically via OAI-PMHAlso ROAR Materials Archiving Policies ROARMAP -163 Institutional repositories (including Rourkela NationalInstitute of Technology, Bharathidasan University in India)(http://roarmap.eprints.org) 44. Other overviews of IRsRepository66 a mash-up by Stuart Lewis formerly of Aberystwyth, now at Auckland University, New Zealand based on OpenDOAR and ROAR (http://maps.repository66.org/)World ranking of institutional repositories(http://repositories.webometrics.info/about_rank.html) 45. Searching Across Multiple IRsThe use of OAI-PMHcompliant metadatapermits one stopshopping 46. Repository architecture Largely institutional focus though some exceptions arXiv, COGPRINTS, etc Interoperability through centralized aggregators(national and global) Search services (OAIster, Intute, ) Registries (DOAR, ROAR, ) Harvesting metadata about content using OAI-PMH(metadata = simple Dublin Core) Content = PDF 47. Constraints of IR Absence of a well defined institutional policy Lack of IR expertise in India Insufficient funds for IT Infrastructure andmanpower Apathy of authors towards time consuming andlengthy deposition procedure. Ignorance of users in the absence of appropriateliteracy program 48. Constraints of IR (Contd) Publishers rigid attitude towards copyright policy Customization of open source software is a bottleneck Nature of content: Classified/restricted andUnclassified/Open Diversity of content and the language used in thefull texts Relying on unproven methods for long term digitalpreservation. 49. Institutional Repositories: Indian Scenario Nearly 54 Institutions Dspace 37 Eprints - 13 Greenstone 1 Inhouse - 7 Leading IRs IISc, ISI, NAL, NCL, NIO, RRI, DU, IITs 50. Digital Preservation in IRsImportance of Digital Information Preservation 1975 Two Viking space probes sent to Mars by USA. Data generated by unrepeatable mission cost $1 billion. Recorded data on magnetic tapes was corrupted /unidentifiable after 2 decades despite being kept in climatecontrolled environment. Scientists could not access data, unable to decode theformats used. 51. Importance of Digital InformationPreservation Original format developers not alive. Finally old printouts tracked and retyped. NASA therefore is the biggest supporter of DigitalPreservation Projects. This illustrates wide gap in information generation and itsmanagement. 52. Threats Media decay and failure Massive storage failures, outdated media Access Component Obsolescence Outdated formats, applications & systems Human and Software errors & External Events 53. Information DelugePresent & Future ProjectionsYawning gap betweenOur ability to create digital informationOur infrastructure and capacity to manage and preserve it over timeCumulative effect foreseen as future digital dark ages 54. Need for Digital Preservation preserving natural/cultural heritages for promoting academic research enabling public access to legacy collections 55. IRs and Digital Preservation An IR is a model for a preservation system It requires most essentially an organizational commitment to thestewardship of digital materials, including long-termpreservation where appropriate, as well as organization and access ordistribution Attributes of a Trusted Digital Repositoryan organisation that has responsibility for the long-term maintenance of digital resources, as well as making them available [through time and across changing technologies] to communities agreed on by the depositor and the repository.Research Libraries Grouphttp://www.rlg.org/longterm/attributes01.pdf 56. Definition: Digital PreservationThe maintenance of digital materials over the long-termwith a view to ensuring its continued accessibility. Itensures that the digital resources are stored correctlyand maintained adequately in the online world, suchthat they are available consistently for use over time.Long-term includes timescales of decades or even centuries 57. Preservation Strategies Technology preservation Keep the hardware alive Technology emulation Create an environment to be able to run the existingsoftware Data migration Convert data to new formats to run in new applications 58. Open Archival Information System(OAIS)SIP = Submission InformationPackageAIP = Archive In formationPackageDIP = Dissemination InformationPackage Published by Consultative Committee for Space Data System(CCSDS) 2002, ISO 14721 : 2003 standard An archive consists of an organization of people and systems withresponsibility to preserve information and make it available tousers. 59. OAIS: Definitions To define an Open Archival Information System The term open means that the document was developed in anopen way, and does not imply that access to any OAIS should beunrestricted An archive is defined as an "organization that intends to preserveinformation for access and use by a designated community." (p. 1-8) While an OAIS itself need not be permanent, the informationbeing maintained has been deemed to need "Long TermPreservation" Long term = long enough for there to be a concern about the impact of changing technologies 60. OAIS: Purpose and Scope Primary focus on digital information Specific aims include: A framework for the understanding and awareness of the archivalconcepts needed for long term preservation (access) Terminology and concepts for describing and comparing: Architectures and operations Preservation strategies and techniques Data models Consensus on elements and processes for long term preservation A foundation for other standards 61. OAIS: Applicability Applicability: Applicable to any archive, but mainly focused onorganisations with responsibility for making informationavailable for the long term Of interest to those who create information Conformance An OAIS must support the information model - but does notspecify any particular method of implementation Mandatory responsibilities (section 3.1) 62. Implementing OAIS Summing up the fundamentals : OAIS is a reference model (conceptual framework), NOT ablueprint for system design It informs the design of system architectures, the development ofsystems and components It provides common definitions of terms, a common language andmeans of making comparison But it does NOT ensure consistency or interoperability betweenimplementations 63. Summing Up : OAIS The OAIS model is a foundation stone for current and future digital preservation efforts It is already widely used to inform the development of preservation tools and repositories It could be used in the future as a basis for conformance 64. Research Objectives1. To design an institutional repository using DSpace, that is both sustainable and viable and can fulfill the long-term digital preservation of materials deposited into it2. To map the Open Archival Information System (OAIS) Reference Model on the in situ institutional repository, weigh the benefits of OAIS features against institutional repository usability and to identify the institutional repository challenges to the relevant features of the OAIS3. To assess the applicability of products developed by projects employing the OAIS model on small and medium sized institutional repositories, using the IIG institutional repository as a test bed4. To ensure that the required policies, guidelines, strategies, procedures and agreements exist while implementing the OAIS model, that will embed digital preservation into IIGs workflow 65. Conclusion from the study This research was able to identify all the components necessary for the implementation of the OAIS model for a geoscience domain specific institutional repository