Instant Ortho

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/2/2019 Instant Ortho

    1/4

    Inside

    Esthetics

    Instant Orthodontics

    by Ana El ashvi l i, DDS, MS; Gera ld E. Denehy, DDS, MS

    A case report using direct resin composite for malpositioned anterior teeth.

    Modern resin composite systems provide excellent strength, smoothness, color stability, and longevity. Because

    they often require minimal or no tooth structure removal, composit e resin restorati ons are t he treatment of

    choice in many unesthetic situations, including those of malpositioned anterior teeth.

    There are several tr eatment alternatives for slight-t o-moderat e anter ior t ooth malposit ioning. The fir st optionto be considered should be ort hodontic t reatment, especially in younger pati ents with unrestored teeth.

    However, the cost or l ength of orthodontic t reatment often makes this t reatment undesirable for many patients.

    Recent literature suggests that minor tooth-alignment issues, such as facio-lingual displacement and crowding,

    may be resolved wit h indir ect porcelain veneer restorati ons.1,2

    However, others have questioned the value of

    this t reatment because of the nonconservati ve nature of the indir ect pr eparat ions.3,4

    There are many cases where, in lieu of orthodontics, less-aggressive procedures such as bleaching and direct-

    bonded restorations can be combined to achieve excellent esthetic results with good longevity at an affordable

    cost. In many cases, composite resin restorations require minimal or, in some cases, no tooth structure removal.

    They also can be repaired or replaced more easily and less expensively then porcelain veneer restorations. 1

    This article will describe a malalignment case that was successfully treated with composite resin and discusses

    the steps that are cr it ical t o success wit h this procedure.

    History

    The patient, a 64-year-old woman, pr esented for an esthetic consult ation stati ng that she wanted straight

    teeth. The pati ent confessed that she always covered her mouth when she laughed. She did not want to go

    through orthodontic t reatment at her age and was seeking alt ernative t reatment. Her dental history revealed

    regular dental vi sits wit h several moderate-sized dir ect r estor ations and crowns on poster ior teeth.

    Clini cal Findi ngs

    A comprehensive examination of the pati ent revealed unrestored anteri or teeth, good periodontal health, and

    no apparent areas of decay. Her gingiva was healt hy wit h no bleeding upon probing. She presented wit h an

    Angle Class I poster ior relat ionship and a 50%overbit e in t he anter ior. The temporomandibular j oint had no

    history of sounds or pain. Teeth Nos. 7 through 10 were in function only during protrusive movement.

    The estheti c fi ndings included malaligned maxillary anteri or t eeth. Tooth No. 8 was rotated wi th t he mesial l ine

    angle facial to t he rest of t he arch curvature. Tooth No. 9 was lingually posit ioned wi th a small overlap of t ooth

    No. 8 on the mesial. The incisal t hird of t ooth No. 10 was facial t o the rest of the arch curvature (Figure 1 View

    Figure and Figure 2 View Figure). The patient had a low lip- line smile covering the gingival areas of the

    maxill ary anterior teeth (Figure 3 View Figure).

    Treatment Plan

    The patient was provided wi th all alternati ve t reatments opt ions including the advantages, disadvantages, and

    relati ve costs of each t reatment . She declined ort hodontic tr eatment and selected the options of bleaching

    foll owed by realignment wit h direct resin composit es.

    Treatment

    Preplanning is crucial to success in any dental procedure and direct realignment is no exception. Study casts are

    important to the success of composite resin restorations for several reasons in malalignment situations. First,

    the clinician can determine if any tooth str ucture needs to be removed fr om the malposit ioned teeth before

    restor ati on placement. Second, an ideal wax-up can be perf ormed, which helps the clinician to visuali ze the

    thickness and contours to be developed during the placement of the resin composite (Figure 4 View Figure and

    Figure 5 View Figure). Wax-up models are also important for patient education and decision-making. An

    additional mock-up with resin composite can be done at chairside if desired.

    An important step i n restori ng slight- to-moderate tooth malposit ioning with resin composite is preoperat ivetooth whit ening. To correct t he malalignment to the desired arch curvature, enamel r econtouring is oft en

    needed. To avoid creating a shade change difference in this case, preoperative tooth whitening is important.

    Color change after teeth whitening occurs throughout the dentin.5-7

    By lightening the dentin shade similar to

    that of the enamel, any recontouring and thinning of the enamel does not produce a higher chroma effect. This

    establishes a good basic tooth color, thus eliminating the need for a thicker layer of composite to disguise

    discolorations.

    Preoperative bleaching trays with 10%carbamide peroxide (Opalescence, Ultradent Products Inc,

    http:/ / www.ultradent.com) were delivered to the patient w it h instr uctions to use overnight. The tooth color

    recorded at baseli ne was shade A3 using t he Vitapan Classical Shade Guide (Vident, http:/ / www.vident.com).

    After 2 weeks of use, the teeth had lightened to an A1 shade. The patient was satisfied with the shade, and was

    scheduled for composite resin veneer placement 2 weeks after bleaching completion.

    The four maxillary i ncisors were r estor ed to create t he estheti c il lusion of alignment. The mesio-facial li ne angle

    http://www.insidedentistry.net/print.php

    3/12/2010

  • 8/2/2019 Instant Ortho

    2/4

    of tooth No. 8 and the incisal facial third of tooth No. 9 were reshaped using a medium-grit diamond. Figure 6

    View Figure and Figure 7 View Figure show the maxillary i ncisors after t he enamel r econtouring. Notice that the

    overlap of t ooth No. 8 was corrected before placement of t he direct r estorations. The teeth were isolated

    (OptraGate, Ivoclar Vivadent, http:/ / www.ivolcarvivadent.com) and clear matr ix str ips were used to isolate

    adj acent t eeth. Bonding was done one toot h at a time. A three-step, et ch-and-ri nse bonding system (OptiBond

    FL, Kerr Dental, http:/ / www.kerrdental.com), was used. Because all bonding surfaces were in enamel, the

    surface was thoroughly dried and only the adhesive was used. Teeth were etched with 37%phosphoric acid for

    20 seconds, rinsed, and thoroughly dried. Adhesive was applied and light-cured for 20 seconds.

    A nanofil l composit e resin composit e (Fil tekSupreme Plus, 3M ESPE, http: / / www.3mespe.com) in the A1 body

    shade was used to individually restore the facial contours of teeth Nos. 7 through 10. The material was placed

    and smoothed using a Gold Microf il Instrument (Almore, http:/ / www.almore.com), an IPC instr ument

    (Cosmedent , http: / / www.cosmedent. com) and a #3 sable brush. Composite resin additions also wereindividually placed to align the lingual contour of teeth Nos. 8 and 10. Placement of composite resin on the

    lingual surfaces is an important step for realignment as it helps to create a uniform thickness of the incisal

    edges when viewed from different angles. To accommodate thicker incisal edges, such as those established with

    this pati ent, the incisal edge needs to be inclined toward the li ngual t o result in bett er esthetics. Each

    restoration was light-cured for 40 seconds.

    Contouri ng was done wit h f inishing burs, coarse f inishing di scs (Sof-LexXT, 3M ESPE), and f inishing diamonds.

    Finishing st ri ps (Epit exStr ips, GC America, http: / / www.gcamerica.com) were used to poli sh the interpr oximal

    surfaces (Figure 8 View Figure). Final polishing was done with polishing cups and points (Diacomp, Brasseler

    USA, http: / / www.br asselerusa.com) followed by a polishing paste (Enamelize, Cosmedent) using felt discs

    (FlexiBuff , Cosmedent).

    The finished composite resin restorations are seen in Figure 9 View Figure and Figure 10 View Figure. The

    patient was very pleased with the outcome. The postoperative smile 11 months after treatment is shown in

    Figure 11 View Figure.

    Conclusion

    This article describes an alternative treatment to orthodontics using resin composite. An outstanding cosmetic

    result can be achieved with resin-based composite restorations. Proper case selection, diagnostic casts,

    wax-up, and preoperative tooth whitening are all essential steps for success.

    References

    1. Chri stensen GJ. Veneer mania. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006;137(8):1161-1163.

    2. Jacobson N, Frank CA. The myth of instant orthodontics: an ethical quandary. J Am Dent Assoc.

    2008;139(4):424-434.

    3. Heymann HO, Kokich VG. Instant orthodontics: vi able tr eatment opt ion or quick fi x cop-out? J Esthet

    Restor Dent . 2002;14(5): 263-264.

    4. Spear FM. The estheti c correcti on of anteri or dental mal-ali gnment conventi onal vs. i nstant (restorative)

    orthodontics. J Cal if Dent Assoc. 2004;32(2):133-141.

    5. Joiner A, Thakker G, Cooper Y. Evaluation of a 6%hydrogen peroxide tooth whitening gel on enamel and

    dentine microhardness in vi tr o. J Dent . 2004;32(Suppl 1):27-34.

    6. McCaslin AJ, Haywood VB, Potter BJ, et al. Assessing dentin color changes from nightguard vital bleaching. J

    Am Dent Assoc. 1999;130(10):1485-1490.

    7. Whit e DJ, Kozak KM, Zoladz JR, et al. Ef fects of t ooth-whitening gels on enamel and dentin ult rast ructurea

    confocal laser scanning microscopy pilot study. Compend Conti n Educ Dent. 2000;29(Suppl ): S29-S34.

    Figure 1

    http://www.insidedentistry.net/print.php

    3/12/2010

  • 8/2/2019 Instant Ortho

    3/4

    Figure 2Figure 3

    PREOPERATIVE CONDITION ( 1. ) Preoperative smile view. (2.)Preoperative

    facial view. (3.) Preoperative i ncisal vi ew, showing malaligned f ront teeth.

    Figure 4 Figure 5

    Figure 6 Figure 7

    Figure 8 Figure 9

    Figure 10 Figure 11

    CASE PRESENTATION (4 . ) Proposed contour wax-up, facial v iew. (5.) Proposed

    contour w ax-up, i ncisal view. (6.) Enamel recontouring, facial view. (7.) Enamel

    recontouring, incisal v iew. (8.) Contours established, pre-polish. (9.) Immediate

    postoperative facial view. (10.)Immediate postoperati ve incisal vi ew. (11.)

    Postoperat ive smile at 11 months.

    About t he Authors

    http://www.insidedentistry.net/print.php

    3/12/2010

  • 8/2/2019 Instant Ortho

    4/4

    Ana Elashvili, DDS, MS

    Assistant Professor

    Department of Restorative Dentistry

    Universit y of Colorado School of Dental Medicine

    Aurora, Colorado

    Gerald E. Denehy, DDS, MS

    Professor and Head

    Department of Operati ve Dentistr y

    The University of Iowa, College of Dentistry

    Iowa Cit y, Iowa

    Print article

    http://www.insidedentistry.net/print.php

    3/12/2010