Upload
jemimah-boone
View
219
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Installation Leadership Forum
August 7, 2012
Dr. Craig College, Deputy Assistant Chief of Staff for Installation Management, Department of Army
2012 ADC ANNUAL CONFERENCE| PAGE 2
The Fiscal Driver
Federal Surplus / Deficit
-1,600
-1,400
-1,200
-1,000
-800
-600
-400
-200
0
200
TY
$ in
B
-12%
-10%
-8%
-6%
-4%
-2%
0%
2%
4%
Su
rplu
s / D
efi
cit
as %
of
GD
P
CBO 5 Mar 10 ProjectionCBO 5 Mar 10 Projection
40-year average(1969-2009):
-2.6%
FY08 – $459BFY09 – $1413BFY10 – $1500BFY11 – $1341BFY12 – $915B
FYDP average(2011-2015):
-5.4%
Federal Surplus / Deficit
-1,600
-1,400
-1,200
-1,000
-800
-600
-400
-200
0
200
TY
$ in
B
-12%
-10%
-8%
-6%
-4%
-2%
0%
2%
4%
Su
rplu
s / D
efi
cit
as %
of
GD
P
CBO 5 Mar 10 ProjectionCBO 5 Mar 10 Projection
40-year average(1969-2009):
-2.6%
FY08 – $459BFY09 – $1413BFY10 – $1500BFY11 – $1341BFY12 – $915B
FYDP average(2011-2015):
-5.4%
FYDP average(2011-2015):
-5.4%
2012 ADC ANNUAL CONFERENCE| PAGE 3
.0 M
1.0 M
2.0 M
3.0 M
4.0 M
5.0 M
6.0 M
7.0 M
8.0 M
$ B
$100 B
$200 B
$300 B
$400 B
$500 B
$600 B
$700 B
$800 BDoD Military Manpower DoD Total Manpower DoD $ (FY12 Constant $) FY01-11 Base (FY12 Constant $)
Korean WarArmistice (1953)
Vietnam WarEnds (1973)
Height ofVietnam
War (1968)
Gulf WarEnds (1991)
Height ofCold War
(1985)
9/11(2001)
The Defense Budget Over Time• Discretionary spending is ~35% of total federal budget – Defense budget is ~50% of discretionary spending • Increasing emphasis on reducing spending/deficit – Congress and the Administration• Historically, funding levels have decreased as military demand decreases
BCA
BCA impact
?
OCO?
2012 ADC ANNUAL CONFERENCE| PAGE 4
The Army Budget
$78 $84$97 $103 $103 $105 $112
$131 $143 $144 $140 $135 $135
$26 $40
$64 $72
$109
$121 $92 $99 $100
$68 $50
$78$86
$123
$143
$167$177
$221
$252$235
$243 $240
$203
$185
$ B
$50 B
$100 B
$150 B
$200 B
$250 B
$300 B
FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13
Execution Approp Request
Base OCO OCO Request
2012 ADC ANNUAL CONFERENCE| PAGE 5
Efficiencies at an Installation Near You
• Personnel Reductions– FY11: Eliminated 2,620 Temporary and Term Employees – FY12: Further reductions of Department of the Army Civilians
• HQDA Re-design– Eliminated National Capital Region Division – Eliminated 2-Star FMWRC and merged into IMCOM HQs– Reduced Regions from 7 to 4
• Budget Cuts– Reduced reliance on contractors and implemented quarterly efficiency
reviews of contracts– Reduced Conferences and Travel– MILCON transfer to SRM
2012 ADC ANNUAL CONFERENCE| PAGE 6
2012 ADC ANNUAL CONFERENCE| PAGE 7
Organizational Theory
Hierarchal Chain of command Centralized
Starfish“No head, cut off an arm, and it
grows into a new starfish”
Spider“Cut off the head and it dies”
The most affordable future for military installations and their surrounding communities is to create partnerships in far greater numbers that feed off each other’s strengths and economize on our weaknesses to survive the coming economic challenge. These approaches must become routine and pervasive and the Community Covenant is one such effort.
No defined leader (catalyst) Devoid of chain of command (circles) Decentralized Open system Standing on five legs Passion and enthusiasm
Building Spider and Starfish Collaboration and Partnerships
Concept taken from : The Starfish and the Spider: The Unstoppable Power of Leaderless Leadership by Ori Brafman and Rod Beckstrom
2012 ADC ANNUAL CONFERENCE| PAGE 8
NDAA Legislative Language
• SEC. 331. Intergovernmental Support Agreements with State and Local governments.
– “Secretary of the Military department concerned may enter into an intergovernmental support agreement with a state or local government to provide, receive, or share installation-support services …”
– Allows for mutually beneficial partnerships
– Reduces costs/spreading
– Enhances partnerships, strengthening bonds
2012 ADC ANNUAL CONFERENCE| PAGE 9
Army Community Covenant
Community Covenant beyond the signing ceremony
Where We Are Today• More than 700 Community Covenants signed in all
states, 3 territories, the District of Columbia and OCONUS communities in Europe and Korea
• Communities embracing the Covenant as a platform to build collaborative, coordinated local support
• Community Covenant partners include National Guard, Reserve, Civilian Aides to the Secretary of the Army, Army OneSource Community Support Coordinators, and Recruiters. Partners continue to inspire Community Covenant commitments
• Communities continue to heed the call and take the Community Covenant beyond the signing ceremony and build tangible, innovative local support
2012 ADC ANNUAL CONFERENCE| PAGE 10
QUESTIONS