Upload
sejdi-sejdiu
View
230
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/29/2019 Inspection Report Template Complete 2012.Doc
1/12
Organisation name
Inspection date
Section standard Met Not met
Management: The management of the provision will operate to the benefit ofits students, in accordance with its publicity and in accordance with theDeclaration of legal and regulatory compliance.
Resources and environment: The learning resources and environment willsupport and enhance the studies of students enrolled with the provider, andwill offer an appropriate professional environment for staff.
Teaching and learning: Teachers will have appropriate qualifications and
will be given sufficient support to ensure that their teaching meets the needsof their students. Programmes of learning will be managed for the benefit ofstudents. The teaching observed will meet the requirements of the Scheme.
Welfare and student services: The needs of students for security, pastoralcare, information and leisure activities will be met; any accommodationprovided will be suitable; the management of the accommodation systemswill work to the benefit of students.
Recommendation
We recommendNew applicants accreditation with a spot check in the first 18 months. accreditation for an initial period of one year; with a spot check in the first year to determine whetheraccreditation should be extended beyond this period. [Exceptional recommendation; please include reasons.] withholding accreditation because the section standard(s) for was/were not met. withholding accreditation because the section standard(s) for was/were not met andthere were weaknesses in . However the weaknesses in this/thesearea(s) could be rectified, and the school/institution is invited to apply for a supplementary inspection if, within thenext 12 months, it is able to demonstrate to inspectors that these weaknesses have been addressed.Re-inspection continued accreditation. continued accreditation but recommend that evidence be sought to demonstrate that weaknesses in have been addressed. continued accreditation with a spot check focusing on . continued accreditation with a supplementary inspection to assess the . that accreditation be placed under review because of weaknesses in . The period of review to beended by . withdrawal of accreditation because the section standard(s) for was/were not met.
Publishable statement
The British Council inspected and accredited in . TheAccreditation Scheme assesses the standards of management, resources and premises, teaching and welfare andaccredits organisations which meet the overall standard in each area inspected (seewww.britishcouncil.org/accreditationfor details).
Inspection report
http://www.britishcouncil.org/accreditationhttp://www.britishcouncil.org/accreditationhttp://www.britishcouncil.org/accreditation7/29/2019 Inspection Report Template Complete 2012.Doc
2/12
This private language schoolThe English language teaching department of this college of further education/university/institute ofhigher education/community collegeThis private language teaching organisationThis private boarding school/international study centre
offers courses in English for and for andvacation courses for .
The inspection report noted a need for improvement in the areas of .staff management, student administration, quality assurance, publicity,premises and facilities, learning resources,academic staff profile, academic management, course design, learner management, teaching,care of students, accommodation, leisure opportunities, care of under-18s.
Strengths were noted in the areas of .
The inspection report stated that the organisation met the standards of the Scheme.
Organisation profile
Inspection history Dates/details
First inspection
Last full inspection
Subsequent spot check (if applicable)
Subsequent supplementary check (if applicable)
Subsequent interim visit (if applicable)
Current accreditation status Please select
Other related schools/affiliates
Other related non-accredited activities (in brief)
Private Sector
Date of foundation
Ownership
Other accreditation/inspection Please select
State Sector
Type of institution
Other accreditation Please select
Premises profile
Address of main site Other site(s) inspected Other site(s) used but not inspected
Comments (including details of any additional sites used but not inspected)
Student profile At inspection At peak (organisations estimate)
Of all international students, approximate percentageon ELT/ESOL courses
EFL/ESOL Students (eligible courses) At inspection At peak (organisations estimate)
Total EFL/ESOL student numbers (FT/PT)
7/29/2019 Inspection Report Template Complete 2012.Doc
3/12
Number on PBS Tier 4 General student visas
Number on PBS Tier 4 child visas
Number on student visitor visas
Number on child visitor visas
Full-time ELT (15+ hours per week) 18 years and over
Part-time ELT 18 years and over
Under 16 yearsAged 16-17 years
Minimum age
Typical age range
Typical length of stay
Predominant nationalities
Staff profile At inspection At peak (organisations estimate)
Total number of teachers on eligible ELT courses
Number teaching ELT under 10 hours/week
Number teaching ELT 10-19 hours/week
Number teaching ELT 20 hours and over/week
Total number of additional support/ancillary staff
Course profile
Eligible activities Year round Vacation Other: please select
Run
Seen Run Seen Run Seen
General ELT for adults
General ELT for juniors
English for academic purposes
English for specific purposes (includesEnglish for Executives)
Teacher development
ESOL for citizenship
Other
CommentsInspectors note here (a) the relative proportions of courses run (b) if any are one-to-one and (c) age range for anyjunior courses
NotesOnly list if at least one course was offered and taken up in the 12 months preceding inspection
IntroductionInspectors should note here any characteristics of the organisation not detailed above which will help the ASAC tojudge the appropriateness of the provision.
Criteria
The report form is to be read in conjunction with the criteria.
Boxes should be completed by left clicking on the selected box. You may complete more than one box for eachcriterion (e.g. not met and see comments).
7/29/2019 Inspection Report Template Complete 2012.Doc
4/12
The comments section should include comments on any areas which are not met (where these needexplanation) or specific comments about strengths.
For an area of strength to be included in the publishable statement, strengths must be indicated in 50% or moreof applicable criteria in the sub-section.
To justify a need for improvement in the publishable statement, three or more of the criteria in the section mustbe not met (two or more in quality assurance and leisure).
Comments should be numbered according to the relevant criterion.
You need not add comments if the criterion is met; if you have no comments, write None. in the box.
The summary should give a view as to whether the provision meets the section standard overall. Your comments/summary may use more or less space than is allocated on the template.
Management
Legal and statutory regulations
CriteriaSee
comments
M1 Declaration of compliance
Comments
M1 The items sampled were satisfactory.
orM1 Sampling identified the following issue(s): ; the school/institution should seek further advice fromthe relevant statutory/regulatory body or obtain independent legal advice.
Staff management
Criteria Not met Met StrengthSee
commentsN/a
M2 Management structure
M3 Duties specified N/a
M4 Communication
M5 Human resources policies
M6 Recruitment (under 18s) N/a
M7 Declarations (under 18s) N/a
M8 Induction procedures
M9 Monitoring staff performance
M10 Professional development
Comments
Student administration
Criteria Not met Met StrengthSee
commentsN/a
M11 Administrative staff and resources
M12 Information on course choice
M13 Enrolment procedures
M14 Student records
M15 Student attendance policy
M16 Conditions and procedures
Comments
7/29/2019 Inspection Report Template Complete 2012.Doc
5/12
Quality assurance
Criteria Not met Met StrengthSee
commentsN/a
M17 Action plan N/a
M18 Continuing improvement
M19 Student feedback and action
M20 Staff feedback and action
M21 Complaints
Comments
Publicity
Criteria Not met Met StrengthSee
commentsN/a
M22 Accessible accurate language
M23 Realistic expectations
M24 Course description
M25 Course information N/a
M26 Cost N/a
M27 Level of care
M28 Accommodation
M29 Leisure programme
M30 Teacher descriptions N/a
M31 Accreditation N/a
Comments
Management summary
Resources and environment
Premises and facilities
Criteria Not met Met StrengthSee
commentsN/a
R1 Adequate space
R2 Condition of premises
R3 Classrooms and learning areas
R4 Student relaxation facilities
R5 Signage and display
R6 Staff room(s)
Comments
7/29/2019 Inspection Report Template Complete 2012.Doc
6/12
Learning resources
Criteria Not met Met StrengthSee
commentsN/a
R7 Learning materials
R8 Resources for teachers
R9 Learning technology
R10 Self-access facilities
R11 Library/self-access guidance
R12 Review and development
Comments
Resources and environment summary
Teaching and learning
Academic staff qualifications
Profile at inspection
Professional qualifications Total number of teachers
Diploma-level ELT/TESOL qualification (TEFLQ)
Certificate-level ELT/TESOL qualification (TEFLI)
Diploma-level ELT/TESOL qualification (TEFLQ) + qualified teacher status
(QTS)
Certificate-level ELT/TESOL qualification (TEFLI) + qualified teacher status(QTS)
Holding specialist qualifications only (specify)
YL initiated
Qualified teacher status only (QTS)
Rationale(s) required for teachers without appropriate ELT/TESOL qualifications
Total
These figures please select the academic manager(s)
Comments
Notes
Please list each teacher once, e.g. if they are both TEFLI and TEFLQ, then list them as TEFLQ only.
Specialist qualifications are relevant only where the teacher is teaching ESP or EAP courses. If the teacher isteaching general English only and has specialist qualifications only, list them under Rationale(s) required.
If the teacher has young learners qualifications only and is teaching adults only, list them under Rationale(s)required.
QTS refers only to those who are qualified to teach in state-maintained secondary and primary schools.
Academic staff profile
Criteria Not met Met StrengthSee
commentsN/a
T1 General education (and rationales) N/a
7/29/2019 Inspection Report Template Complete 2012.Doc
7/12
T2 ELT/TESOL teacher qualifications
T3 Rationales for teachers N/a
T4 Profile of academic manager(s)
T5 Rationale for academic manager(s) N/a
T6 Qualifications verified
Comments
Academic management
Criteria Not met Met StrengthSee
commentsN/a
T7 Deployment of teachers
T8 Timetabling
T9 Cover for absent teachers
T10 Continuous enrolment
T11 Support for teachers
T12 Observation and monitoring
Comments
Course design and implementation
Criteria Not met Met StrengthSee
commentsN/a
T13 Course design
T14 Review of course design
T15 Course descriptions
T16 Course structure
T17 Study and learning strategies
T18 Linguistic benefit from UK
Comments
Learner management
Criteria Not met Met StrengthSee
commentsN/a
T19 Placement
T20 Monitoring students progress
T21 Examination guidance
T22 Assessment criteria
T23 Academic reports
T24 Information on UK education
Comments
7/29/2019 Inspection Report Template Complete 2012.Doc
8/12
Classroom observation record
Number of teachers seen
Number of observations
Parts of programme(s) observed
Comments
Classroom observation
Criteria Not met Met StrengthSee
commentsN/a
T25 Lesson planning
T26 Coherence
T27 Teaching techniques
T28 Resource management
T29 Linguistic systems of English
T30 Feedback and correction
T31 Classroom management
T32 Sensitivity and learningatmosphere
Comments
Classroom observation summary
Teaching and learning summary
Welfare and student services
Care of students
Criteria Not met Met StrengthSee
commentsN/a
W1 Safety and security
W2 Pastoral care
W3 Personal problems
W4 Dealing with abusive behaviour
W5 Emergency contact number N/a
W6 Transport and transfers
W7 Advice
W8 Medical and dental treatment N/a
Comments
Accommodation profile
7/29/2019 Inspection Report Template Complete 2012.Doc
9/12
Number of students in each at the time of inspection (include all students) Total seen byinspectorsTypes of accommodation Adults Under 18s
Arranged by provider/agency
Homestay
Private home
Home tuition
Residential (student houses, halls or hostels)
Hotel/guesthouse
Independent self-catering
Arranged by student/family/guardian
Please specify, e.g. staying with own family or in privatelyrented rooms/flats
Comments
Accommodation: all types
Criteria Not met Met StrengthSee
commentsN/a
W9 Services and facilities
W10 Accommodation inspected first
W11 Accommodation re-inspected
W12 Accommodation registers
W13 Information
W14 Student feedback
W15 Meals in homestay/residences
Comments
Accommodation: homestay and private home
Criteria Not met Met StrengthSee
commentsN/a
W16 No more than four students N/a
W17 Declarations (under 18s) N/a
W18 Rules, terms and conditions
W19 Shared bedrooms N/a
W20 Students first language N/a
W21 Language of communication N/a
W22 Adult to welcome N/a
Comments
Accommodation: residential
7/29/2019 Inspection Report Template Complete 2012.Doc
10/12
Criteria Not met Met StrengthSee
commentsN/a
W23 Cleaning
W24 Health
Comments
Accommodation: other
Criteria Not met Met StrengthSee
commentsN/a
W25 Information and support
W26 Other accommodation N/a
Comments
Leisure opportunities
Criteria Not met Met Strength Seecomments
N/a
W27 Events and activities
W28 Leisure programmes
W29 Health and safety
W30 Responsible person
Comments
Care of under 18sFor publishable statement, also take account of M6, M7, W1, W2 and W17.
Criteria Not met Met StrengthSee
commentsN/a
W31 Accommodation and mealsprovided
N/a
W32 Inclusive leisure programme N/a
W33 Activities supervision ratio
W34 Student rules
W35 Supervision information
W36 Host awareness
W37 Responsible adult N/a
W38 Age-segregated accommodation N/a
W39 Residential supervision ratio
W40 Contact number for parent
W41 Contact number for provider N/a
W42 Group leaders N/a
Comments
7/29/2019 Inspection Report Template Complete 2012.Doc
11/12
Welfare and student services summary
Points to be addressedThe list of points to be addressed below should include those criteria which were not met and those parts that werenot met in criteria that involve more than one requirement. (In such composite criteria inspectors may award a Metif they judge that most of the requirements were met and that the Not met parts did not seriously affect the studentexperience.) Please complete the following sections in blue can be deleted if there is nothing to report.
Points which must be addressed before accreditation can be recommended(For accredited providers seeking continued accreditation, this will signal a delay in ASAC recommendation, a
recommendation to place accreditation under review or a recommendation to withdraw accreditation.)
Management
Resources and environment
Teaching and learning
Welfare and student services
Points which must be addressed within six/12/18months(This will trigger a recommendation for a spot check or submission of documentary evidence.)
Management
Resources and environment
Teaching and learning
Welfare and student services
Other points to be addressed
Management
Resources and environment
Teaching and learning
Welfare and student services
7/29/2019 Inspection Report Template Complete 2012.Doc
12/12