Insolvency Projct

7/30/2019 Insolvency Projct

1/15

5 | P a g e

Chapter T a b l e o f C o n t e n t s Page

no.

1. Introduction

1.1 Statement of Problem1.2 Objectives of Research1.3 Scope1.4 Hypotheses1.5 Research Methodology

6

2. Transfer to Third Party 11

3. Act of Insolvency Outside India 14

4. Party of Privy to Transfer for benefit of Creditors 15

5. Transfer for benefit for creditors void as against

Official Receiver or Assignee

16

6. Conclusion 17

7. Bibiliography 18


2/15

6 | P a g e

INTRODUCTION

There are two statutes which govern the laws of insolvency in India. One is

Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909. This Act is applicable to three Presidency

Towns namely Calcutta, Madras and Bombay. The High Court of Calcutta, Madras

and Bombay has the jurisdiction to try the Insolvency proceedings under this Act.

The second Act is Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920 and it is applicable to all parts of

India except the three above towns; and the District Courts has the jurisdiction to try

the Insolvency proceedings under this Act.

On the passing of an order of insolvency, all the properties of the insolvent,

wherever situated, shall be vested in the official Assignee, for its realization and

distributed among the body of creditors. One of the important effect of vesting is

that the insolvent cannot deal with his property. No buyer from the insolvent can get

a good title.

Instituting Insolvency proceedings may be very effective way of instilling a healthy

fear in the minds of dishonest debtors that if they do not pay the debt, they may be

adjudged as an insolvent.

Insolvency is a proceeding, wherein on the alleged act of insolvency committed by

the debtor, the possession of property of a debtor is seized up for the benefit of thebody of creditors, generally by an officer appointed for the purpose by the Court

The Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909 and Provisional Insolvency Act, 1920 are

two major enactments that deal with personal insolvency and have parallel

provisions and their substantial content is also similar but the two differ in respect of

their territorial jurisdiction. While Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909 applies in

Presidency towns namely, Kolkata, Mumbai and Chennai, Provincial Insolvency


3/15

7 | P a g e

Act, 1920 applies to all provinces of India. These two Acts are applicable to

individuals as well as to sole proprietorships and partnership firms.

The Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909 and Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920

exhaustively lays down as to what are the acts of insolvency, the powers of Courts to

adjudicate a person as insolvent, restriction on the jurisdiction of the Court

annulment of adjudication proceedings, consequences of an order of adjudication,

submissions of proposal for composition in satisfaction of debts or for scheme of

arrangement of the affairs of the insolvent, conditions in which composition and

schemes of arrangement are approved by the Court, control over the person and

property of insolvent, discharge of insolvent, administration and distribution of the

property of the insolvent, Properties which would be available for payment of debts,

realization of the insolvent property, appointments, duties, powers and functions of

Official Assignee and other insolvency related procedural matters.

A debtor is supposed to have committed an act of insolvency in the following cases:

(a)If, in the States or elsewhere, he makes a transfer of all or substantially all hisproperty to a third person for the benefit of his creditors generally;

(b)If, in the States or elsewhere, he makes a transfer of his property or of any partthereof with intent to defeat or delay his creditors;

(c) If, in the States or elsewhere, he makes any transfer of his property or of anypart thereof, which would, under this or any other enactment for the time

being in force, be void as a fraudulent preference if he were adjudged an

insolvent;

(d)If, with intent to defeat or delay his creditors,--(i) he departs or remains out of the States,

(ii) he departs from his dwelling-house or usual place of business orotherwise absents himself,


4/15

8 | P a g e

(iii) he secludes himself so as to deprive his creditors of the means of

communicating with him;

(e)If any of his property has been sold or attached for a period of not less thantwenty-one days in execution of the decree of any Court for the payment of

money;

(f) If he petitions to be adjudged an insolvent;(g)If he gives notice to any of his creditors that he has suspended, or that he is

about to suspend, payment of his debts;

(h)If he is imprisoned in execution of the decree of any Court for the payment ofmoney

For example If an individual has assets worth Rupees 50 crores and liabilities

worth Rupees 5 crores, he will be considered insolvent if he refuses to discharge his

liabilities in spite of having assets more than his liabilities. The main criteria for a

person to be adjudged insolvent is that he should suspend or refuse payment

.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

1. Whether the transfer to for the benefit of creditors could be termedas act of insolvency.

2. Whether transfer to third person residing outside India could betermed as act of insolvency.


5/15

9 | P a g e

OBJECTIVES OF RESEARCH

The researcher while commencing the research had certain objectives to

be accomplished:

1. To understand the concept of act on insolvency and transfer tothird party.

SCOPE

The researcher has limited the scope of the project to Insolvency Laws in

India and England.

HYPOTHESES

The researcher before commencing the researcher assumed:


6/15

10 | P a g e

1. That, transfer to third party i.e. to creditor for his benefit is not antof insolvency.

RESEARCH METHODOLODY

The research methodology used for the project is the non-empirical type

of research. The sources from where the data has been collected are

secondary sources.


7/15

11 | P a g e

TRANSFER TO THIRD PARTY

The expression transfer of property has been defined in section 2(f) as including a

transfer of an interest in property and creation of any charge upon the property. The

expression transfer of property has been defined under section 5 of the Transfer of

Property Act as meaning as an act by which a living person conveys property. In

present or in future, to one or more other living persons or himself, or to himself and

one or more other living persons: and to transfer property is to perform such act.In this section living person includes a company or an association or a body or an

individual(s) whether incorporated or not, but nothing herein contained shall affect

any law, for the time being in force for the transfer of property to or by companies,

association or bodies of individuals.

A debtor generally commits an act of insolvency if in India or, elsewhere, he makes a

transfer of all or substantially all of his property to a third person for the benefit of

his creditor generally. A transfer fir the benefit of creditors generally though is not

expressly mentioned in the prior acts, but is considered and treated as an act of

insolvency, the reason being that the transferor thereby deprived himself from the

power of carrying on his trade, and endeavored to put his property into a course of

distribution among his creditors different from that which would take place under

the insolvency law and without the safeguards which the law provides.1

In order that a transfer for the benefit of creditors may be an act of insolvency, it is

necessary that the transfer must be for the benefit of all the creditors, and not a

particular class of creditors. A transfer by a debtor for the benefit of trade creditors

only is not an act of insolvency under clause (a) though it may amount to fraudulent

1 Re Spackman (1890) 24 Q.B.D. 728, 738


8/15

12 | P a g e

transfer under clause (b) or a fraudulent preference under clause (c) of the section.2 A

composition deed whereby the debtor transfers his property to trustees for the

benefit of such of his creditors as may sign it within a specified period to a transfer

for the benefit of his creditors generally and as such an act of insolvency. 3 For a

transfer under this clause to constitute as act of insolvency it is not necessary to

prove an intent to defeat or delay creditors as it is in clause (b), such a transfer has

always been deemed in itself to have that effect.

Section 6 of the Provincial Insolvency Act sets out the conduct or acts of the debtor

which may be regarded as acts of insolvency. But it does not purport to state at

which point of time an act of insolvency shall be deemed to be committed. The point

of time has to be decided on evidence. The acts mentioned in Section 6 are either

voluntary acts of insolvency or involuntary acts of insolvency. The involuntary acts

are of a kind by which a creditor is able to compel a debtor to disclose his insolvent

condition even if the insolvent is careful enough not to commit a voluntary act of

insolvency. One such act is that the insolvent has been imprisoned in execution of a

decree and another is that his property has been sold in execution of a decree of any

court for payment of money.4

For a transfer for benefit of creditors to constitute acts of insolvency there must be an

operative transfer of all or substantially all the debtors property so as to put it out of

his power to deal with it.5 And further the transfer must be to a third person

where the debtor had transferred all the textile goods in his place of business , which

constituted his only asset, for the benefit of creditors to a third person, a debtor did

commit an act of insolvency.6 A mere declaration of trust by debtor, or a mere

agreement by him that his property shall be dealt with for the benefit of the

2Re Philips (1900) 2 Q.B. 329

3Karsandas v. Madanlal, (1920) 26 Bom. 476

4

Yenumulla Malludora v. P.Seetharathnam, AIR 1966 SC 9185Re Hughes, (1893) 1 Q.B. 595

6Krishna Kumar Singhvi v. S. Lalchand, 1980 Legal Survey 1


9/15

13 | P a g e

creditors7 pr a mere letter by the debtor to a third person authorizing him to realize

his property and holds the proceeds for the benefit of his creditors 8, is not such a

transfer as is contemplated by this section and does not constitute an act of

insolvency.

An out and out sale in favour of a third person by debtor is not a transfer for the

benefit of creditors, even though such transfer is for the benefit of creditors and even

though such transfer is for the benefit of creditors and the transferee retains the

consideration for that purpose. The word benefit has a significance of its own and

for a creditor to be a beneficiary under a transfer, it is necessary even though the

strict rules of law of trust are not applied, that the creditor gets certain rights under

the transfer which he will be in a position to enforce as against the creditors, it

cannot be said that under such transfer , the creditor will have any right to proceed

as against the transferee.

Even if the transfer makes a provision that the transferee will withhold amounts for

the purposes of paying off the creditors which would enable them to claim theamount from the transferee direct. Provision for paying off creditors by the

transferee is introduced evidently with the intention of safeguarding the interest of a

transferee and by such a provision it cannot be said that the transferee has declared

himself to be atrustee or that the transferor has settled a trust in his favour. Even if

the word Transfer is taken in its wider sense, the riding condition is that such a

transfer should be for the benefit of the creditors generally.9 Where a debtor sold his

bungalow for the payment of his debts, then due to financial crisis and inability to

recover full dues the debtor transferred an actionable claim for a lesser amount did

not constitute an act of insolvency.10

7Re Spackman, (1890) 24 Q.B.D. 728

8Lipton v. Bell, (1924) 1 K.B.

9

Pydimarri Venkateshwarlu v. Pydimarri Jalamma, AIR 1969 AP 318


10/15

14 | P a g e

ACT OF INSOLVENCY COMMITTED OUTSIDE INDIA

The words or elsewhere coupled with the words or remains out of India in clause

(d)(i), show that a transfer of his property by a debtor for the benefit of his creditors

executed outside India may be an act of insolvency, in other words, that an act of

insolvency may be committed abroad.

In abovementioned case, however the debtor must be domiciled in India, and the

transfer must be intended to operate according to the law of India.

A transfer executed by a foreigner who has never been in this country and has

himself personally done no act within the jurisdiction of the insolvency courts in

India, is not an act of insolvency, though he may have traded through his agent in

this country and may have contracted debts and acquired property in this country.


11/15

15 | P a g e

PARTY OR PRIVY TO TRANSFER FOR BENEFITS OF CREDITORS

A creditor who has assented to a transfer for the benefit of creditor cannot, as a rule,

take advantage of it as an act of insolvency, but he may do so if his assent has been

procured by misrepresentation of his assets by the debtor, or if the transfer isfraudulent as against him for instance on the ground of a secret preference given to

another creditor.

Where creditors, who have heard a statement by a the debtor about his inability to

pay debts, do not press their rights but accept a portion of their just dues and do not

interfere with the carrying on the debtors business, they are not stopped from

relying on the act of insolvency for adjudicating the debtor as insolvent.


12/15

16 | P a g e

TRANSFER FOR BENEFIT OF CREDITORS VOID AS AGAINST

OFFICIAL ASSIGNEE OR RECEIVER

If a debtor transfers all or substantially all of his property for the benefit of his

creditors generally and is adjudicated as insolvent within three months after the date

of transfer, the transfer is void as against the Official Assignee or Receiver whether

the adjudication was on the petition of the creditor or of the debtor and the trustees

of the deed must hand over the property to the Official Assignee or Receiver or the

case maybe.

A transfer, however, for the benefit of the creditors generally is not not void in itself,and effect will be given to it if insolvency does not ensue within three months from

the date of transfer. If the debtor is not adjudged insolvent within that period, the

trustees of the deed will continues to hold the property for the benefit of his

creditors; and the debtor being divested of all the interest in the property, it cannot

be attached in execution of a decree against him, though the decree-holder was not a

party to the deed.


13/15

17 | P a g e

CONCLUSION

Thus, it can said that the act of insolvency i.e Transfer to third party is not limited

upto the bare-text as enshrined in the provision. The interpretation changes from

facts and circumstances, this provision has been also interpreted and utilized

accordingly by English courts.

The provision is of great importance as it is an open-ended terminological use by

the draftsmen so as to cover almost all key areas for which this particular provision

has been enacted.


14/15

18 | P a g e

BIBLIOGRAPHY

BOOKS-

Justice Narayan, P.S. Law of Insolvency {Bankruptcy}. (Hyderabad: AsiaLaw House) 2007

Bharihoke Neera and Talwar Neera, Law of Insolvency. (Delhi: Delhi LawHouse)

WEBSITES-

http://www.jsalaw.com/Admin/uplodedfiles/PublicationFiles/Post-Petition%20Financing%20Article.pdf

http://www.nishithdesai.com/Research-Papers/Comparative%20note%20on%20bankruptcy%20laws%20-

%20US%20%20India.pdf

http://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2006/10/articles/business-bankruptcy-issues/doing-business-with-a-customer-in-bankruptcy-what-you-need-to-know/

http://www.legalservicesindia.com/articles/corin.htm http://commonlaw-sandeep.blogspot.in/2011/04/insolvency-very-briefly.html http://indiankanoon.org/doc/397284/?type=print


15/15

19 | P a g e

http://www.merinews.com/article/insolvency-proceedings-rules-and-legal-cases/15860222.shtml

Documents

Insolvency Projct