32
Insights from Radio Wavelengths into Supernova Progenitors Laura Chomiuk Jansky Fellow, Michigan State University

Insights from Radio Wavelengths into Supernova Progenitors Laura Chomiuk Jansky Fellow, Michigan State University

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Insights from Radio Wavelengths into Supernova Progenitors Laura Chomiuk Jansky Fellow, Michigan State University

Insights from Radio Wavelengths into Supernova Progenitors

Laura ChomiukJansky Fellow, Michigan State University

Page 2: Insights from Radio Wavelengths into Supernova Progenitors Laura Chomiuk Jansky Fellow, Michigan State University

Supernova Types: I vs. II

Type I:No Hydrogen

Thermonuclear WD explosions (Ia)

and Core collapse of massive stars stripped of H envelopes (Ib/c)

Type II:Show Hydrogen

Core collapse of massive stars with H envelope

Page 3: Insights from Radio Wavelengths into Supernova Progenitors Laura Chomiuk Jansky Fellow, Michigan State University

Supernova Types: A Continuum of H-richness

Page 4: Insights from Radio Wavelengths into Supernova Progenitors Laura Chomiuk Jansky Fellow, Michigan State University

(Smartt 2009)

A diverse, complicated zoo of massive stars and core-collapse SNe

+ SNe Ia

Page 5: Insights from Radio Wavelengths into Supernova Progenitors Laura Chomiuk Jansky Fellow, Michigan State University

Searching for SN progenitors directly with optical imaging

SN 2005gl

Before During After

Page 6: Insights from Radio Wavelengths into Supernova Progenitors Laura Chomiuk Jansky Fellow, Michigan State University

Or, constraining SN progenitors indirectly-- in the radio

Soderberg et al (2008)

Page 7: Insights from Radio Wavelengths into Supernova Progenitors Laura Chomiuk Jansky Fellow, Michigan State University

SN 1970G: The first SN detected in the radio

(Gottesman et al. 1972, Goss et al. 1973)

Page 8: Insights from Radio Wavelengths into Supernova Progenitors Laura Chomiuk Jansky Fellow, Michigan State University
Page 9: Insights from Radio Wavelengths into Supernova Progenitors Laura Chomiuk Jansky Fellow, Michigan State University

shell

Page 10: Insights from Radio Wavelengths into Supernova Progenitors Laura Chomiuk Jansky Fellow, Michigan State University

SN 1994I @ 20 cm Weiler et al. (2011)

absorbed (either free-free or synchrotron)

synchrotron τ ≈ 1

fading because

blast decelerates

and CSM decreases in

density

Page 11: Insights from Radio Wavelengths into Supernova Progenitors Laura Chomiuk Jansky Fellow, Michigan State University

vw ≈ 30 km/svsn ≈ 10,000 km/s

SN blast probes ~1 year of mass loss in one day!

Page 12: Insights from Radio Wavelengths into Supernova Progenitors Laura Chomiuk Jansky Fellow, Michigan State University

What makes a SN bright at radio wavelengths?

A fast blastwave Expansion into dense surroundings

Page 13: Insights from Radio Wavelengths into Supernova Progenitors Laura Chomiuk Jansky Fellow, Michigan State University

Radio bolsters a division in Type I SNe:

Type Ib/c: Show radio emission, core collapse

Type Ia: No radio emission, thermonuclear

(Panagia et al. 1986)

Page 14: Insights from Radio Wavelengths into Supernova Progenitors Laura Chomiuk Jansky Fellow, Michigan State University

Relativistic SN 1998bw associated with GRB 980425

(Kulkarni et al. 1998, Wieringa et al. 1999)(Galama et al. 1998)

Page 15: Insights from Radio Wavelengths into Supernova Progenitors Laura Chomiuk Jansky Fellow, Michigan State University

A diversity of mass loss histories

SN 2003bg (Soderberg et al. 2006)

Page 16: Insights from Radio Wavelengths into Supernova Progenitors Laura Chomiuk Jansky Fellow, Michigan State University

Shells, Spirals, and Shelves

SN 1993J (Weiler et al. 2007)

SN 2007bg (Salas et al. 2012)(Ryder et al. 2004)

SN 2001ig

Page 17: Insights from Radio Wavelengths into Supernova Progenitors Laura Chomiuk Jansky Fellow, Michigan State University

SNe Ib/c: WR stars or interacting binaries?

Page 18: Insights from Radio Wavelengths into Supernova Progenitors Laura Chomiuk Jansky Fellow, Michigan State University

Mdot/vwind = 10-10 10-9 10-8 10-7 10-6

M yr-1 / km s-1

SNe Ib/c show mass loss rates consistent with WR stars.

Page 19: Insights from Radio Wavelengths into Supernova Progenitors Laura Chomiuk Jansky Fellow, Michigan State University

Still no radio emission from SNe Ia

(Panagia et al. 2006)

Time Since Explosion (Days)

Radio Luminosity (erg/s/Hz)

Page 20: Insights from Radio Wavelengths into Supernova Progenitors Laura Chomiuk Jansky Fellow, Michigan State University

WD + Giant

WD + Sub-giant or Main Sequence WD + WD

(NASA/Swift/ Aurore Simonnet, Sonoma State Univ.)

Different progenitor models predict different circumbinary environments.

Page 21: Insights from Radio Wavelengths into Supernova Progenitors Laura Chomiuk Jansky Fellow, Michigan State University
Page 22: Insights from Radio Wavelengths into Supernova Progenitors Laura Chomiuk Jansky Fellow, Michigan State University

...And still no radio emission from SNe Ia!

Assumes vw = 50 km/s

VLA

JVLA

nISM = 1 cm

-3

M = 10

-8 M yr-1

.

Page 23: Insights from Radio Wavelengths into Supernova Progenitors Laura Chomiuk Jansky Fellow, Michigan State University

Strong limits on the environment of SN 2011fe from EVLA

(Chomiuk et al. 2012, Horesh et al. 2011)

SN 2011fe

assumes vw = 50 km/s

nISM = 1 cm

-3

M = 10

-8 M yr-1

.

Page 24: Insights from Radio Wavelengths into Supernova Progenitors Laura Chomiuk Jansky Fellow, Michigan State University

Chomiuk et al. (2012), Margutti et al. (2012)

Strong limits on the environment of SN 2011fe from EVLA

Page 25: Insights from Radio Wavelengths into Supernova Progenitors Laura Chomiuk Jansky Fellow, Michigan State University

SN 2009ip: Watching an LBV explode

(Mauerhan et al. 2012)

Page 26: Insights from Radio Wavelengths into Supernova Progenitors Laura Chomiuk Jansky Fellow, Michigan State University

(Mauerhan et al. 2012)

SN 2009ip: No longer an impostor since ~Sept 15

No radio detection yet; VLA monitoring ongoing

Page 27: Insights from Radio Wavelengths into Supernova Progenitors Laura Chomiuk Jansky Fellow, Michigan State University

SN 1970G revisited

33.7 ± 4.3 μJy @ 5 GHz (Dittman et al. in prep)

Page 28: Insights from Radio Wavelengths into Supernova Progenitors Laura Chomiuk Jansky Fellow, Michigan State University

SN 1970G consistently challenges our radio facilities

(Stockdale et al. 2001, Dittman et al. in prep)

Page 29: Insights from Radio Wavelengths into Supernova Progenitors Laura Chomiuk Jansky Fellow, Michigan State University

SN 1970G: Decline in Radio + Rise in X-rays = Compact Object?

(Dittman et al. in prep)

Page 30: Insights from Radio Wavelengths into Supernova Progenitors Laura Chomiuk Jansky Fellow, Michigan State University

Radio light curves of SNe trace mass loss histories of progenitors.

Discovery of first radio SN

Theory of radio SN

Type I SNe split into Ia and Ib/c

Long GRB associated with a relat-ivistic SN

Diversity of mass loss histories• Ib/c mass loss consistent with WR• No Ia radio detections

Jansky VLA Era:• Sensitivity Bonanza!• Relativistic SNe w/o GRBs• Still no Ia radio detections

Page 31: Insights from Radio Wavelengths into Supernova Progenitors Laura Chomiuk Jansky Fellow, Michigan State University

end

Page 32: Insights from Radio Wavelengths into Supernova Progenitors Laura Chomiuk Jansky Fellow, Michigan State University

A continuum in blast wave velocities between normal SNe Ib/c and GRBs

(Soderberg et al. 2010, more in prep)