Configuration Management Benchmarking Group Conference

June 6 – 9, 2004 Kansas City, MO © 2004 CMBG

INPO AP-929, Rev.1

Presented By:

Mike Stout – PPL

Glenn Neises - INPO

INPO AP-929, Rev. 1

• Draft developed by INPO at the request of the CMBG Steering Committee

• Draft dated May 2003 never issued

• Draft really deals with modification process and some design basis; not a configuration management process

• Steering Committee and INPO have agreed to work together to develop the revision that describes a configuration management process

INPO AP-929, Rev. 1

Approach 

• Establish scope of the document

• 80/20 rule – several members of the group will be asked to work on the document and meet for 2 days to develop the best document in that time frame

• Make it consistent with ANSI/NIRMA CM 1.0-2000

• Start with new process model (IDEF0)

INPO AP-929, Rev. 1

Standard Nuclear Performance Model (IAEA same)• Evaluate problem or request• Consider whether a design change is required• If no, then consider whether a plant change is

required• If no, then consider whether a FCI change is

required• Or, do nothing more and document decision

INPO AP-929, Rev. 1

Missing•  Definitions are not complete

• Configuration Change• Design Authority• Design Specifications• Time effect on completed and installed design

 Changes• The activities in Rev. 1 are not incorrect,

they are incomplete.