Upload
erhard
View
219
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Dynamic Article LinksC<Nanoscale
Cite this: Nanoscale, 2011, 3, 4774
www.rsc.org/nanoscale PAPER
Publ
ishe
d on
11
Oct
ober
201
1. D
ownl
oade
d by
Uni
vers
ity o
f M
isso
uri a
t Col
umbi
a on
17/
08/2
013
10:3
3:38
. View Article Online / Journal Homepage / Table of Contents for this issue
Inorganic–organic nanocomposites based on sol–gel derived magnesiumfluoride†
Johannes Noack,ab Larissa Schmidt,ab Hans-J€urgen Gl€asel,ab Monika Bauer*ab and Erhard Kemnitz*ab
Received 15th July 2011, Accepted 5th September 2011
DOI: 10.1039/c1nr10843c
Monodispersed magnesium fluoride nanoparticles are utilized for the first time to prepare transparent
inorganic–organic nanocomposite materials with improved mechanical properties. The fluorolytic sol–
gel synthesis route has been modified for the preparation of monodispersed magnesium fluoride
nanoparticles with a size of 2–3 nm. MgF2 particles are effectively stabilised against agglomeration by
phosphonic acids, which strongly bind to the particles and lead to an increased compatibility of the
inorganic particles with the organic polymers. This way, highly transparent nanocomposite materials
with up to 20 wt% magnesium fluoride in different acrylates are obtained, featuring high dispersion of
MgF2 particles in the polymer matrix and an increased hardness by the factor of 2. The nature of
interaction between phosphonic acids and magnesium fluoride is thoroughly investigated by IR and
NMR showing a monodentate coordination of phosphonates to the particle’s surface.
1. Introduction
Composites of inorganic nanoparticles embedded in an organic
polymer matrix are of high interest for materials science. Inor-
ganic fillers are widely used for enhanced performance of organic
polymers in terms of thermal or mechanical behaviour and add
new functionality to the polymer material, such as electrical or
thermal conductivity or improved flame retardancy.1–3 Most
frequently used inorganic fillers like soot, SiO2, TiO2, ZnO or
clays are characterised by high mechanical strength and chemical
stability while most organic polymers are flexible and well
processible. Usually, composites are manufactured by mixing the
particles with monomers or polymer melts followed by further
processing, e.g. polymerization or extrusion. The particle sizes in
these composites typically range from a few hundred nanometres
up to some micrometres. The advances in sol–gel technology
offering an easy access to nanoparticle sols marked the starting
point for the development of nanocomposites, predominantly
based on metal oxides, and to elucidate the effects of those
nanoparticles on the materials properties.4–7 Due to large surface
energies of inorganic nanoparticles in contrast to the organic
matrix, agglomeration is one of the major problems in the
preparation of homogeneous composites. Stability of a particle
dispersion can be greatly improved by surface-modification of
aHumboldt-Universit€at zu Berlin, Department of Chemistry,Brook-Taylor-Straße 2, 12489 Berlin, Germany. E-mail: [email protected]; Fax: +49 30 2093 7277bFraunhofer Research Institution Polymeric Materials and CompositesPYCO, Kantstrasse 55, 14513 Teltow, Germany. E-mail: [email protected]
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: See DOI:10.1039/c1nr10843c
4774 | Nanoscale, 2011, 3, 4774–4779
the inorganic moieties, e.g. by silylation of the particle surface8,9
or by complexation with carboxylic or phosphonic acids.10–13 As
the surface of the nanoparticles increases, the particles become
smaller and the interactions at the interface of the particle and
polymer become increasingly dominant, determining the mate-
rial’s properties. Thus, it is apparent that the properties of
a composite directly depend on the size of filler particles and are
strongly affected by the reduction of particle sizes.
Optical properties are characterised by absorption and lumi-
nescence of all constituents and by scattering of the incident light
from the particles. Magnesium fluoride is one of the compounds
with the lowest refractive index of all inorganic substances and it
exhibits transparency over a wide range of wavelengths from the
vacuum UV (120 nm) up to the IR region (8.0 mm). Due to these
favourable optical properties, nanoscopic magnesium fluoride
films are investigated for different applications, such as anti-
refractive coatings and interference filters.14,15 Light scattering is
described by Rayleigh’s law (eqn (1)) giving the relative intensity
of transmitted light of spherical particles homogeneously
dispersed in a matrix—in the case of composites a polymer—in
relation to the volume fraction Fp, sample thickness x, radius of
particles r, incident wavelength l and refractive indexes of the
particles np and matrix nm.16
I
I0¼ e�
�3Fpxr
3
4l4
�np
nm� 1
��(1)
Since light scattering is strongly decreased with diminishing
particle size, it is necessary to homogeneously disperse nano-
particles with diameters not exceeding 1/20th of the wavelength of
incident light in the matrix and to prevent agglomeration in order
to obtain transparent composites.
This journal is ª The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011
Publ
ishe
d on
11
Oct
ober
201
1. D
ownl
oade
d by
Uni
vers
ity o
f M
isso
uri a
t Col
umbi
a on
17/
08/2
013
10:3
3:38
.
View Article Online
Recently, our group has established a fluorolytic sol–gel
process for the synthesis of nanoscopic metal fluorides17,18 which
are examined for their catalytic properties and applicability in
optics, such as anti-reflective coatings or wavelength filters. In
a previous work,13 we studied the agglomeration behaviour of
a magnesium fluoride sol derived from the fluorolytic sol–gel
route. It was found that addition of phosphonic acids which
coordinate to the particle surface apparently stabilises primary
particles with a size of/or below 5 nm. This paved the way for the
preparation of nanocomposite materials made of magnesium
fluoride homogeneously dispersed in organic polymers. Thus, the
present work focuses on the identification of the nature of
interaction between phosphonic acid and MgF2 surfaces by IR,
Raman and NMR and the preparation and the characterisation
of composites with up to 20 wt% magnesium fluoride in acrylate
polymers.
2. Experimental
Commercially available magnesium turnings (Aldrich, 99.98%),
phenylphosphonic acid (Aldrich, 98%), 2-hydroxyethyl methac-
rylate (Aldrich, 99%), 1,6 hexanediol dimethacrylate (Aldrich)
and benzoyl peroxide (Aldrich, 75%) were used as supplied.
Methanol was dried over Mg(OMe)2 and stored over molecular
sieves.
Magnesium methoxide was prepared by dissolving Mg turn-
ings (3.0 g, 123 mmol) in 250 ml dried methanol to give a 0.25
molar solution. A stoichiometric amount of HF which has been
dissolved in methanol (9.3 M) was added to the alkoxide solution
within 5 minutes under vigorous stirring, yielding a turbid
magnesium fluoride sol. For surface modification of the
magnesium fluoride particles 10 mol% of phenylphosphonic acid
were added to the sol and refluxed for 10 h.
Composites from magnesium fluoride and acrylates were
prepared by mixing the sol with the corresponding amount of
monomer and polymerisation initiator, evaporation of the
solvent and polymerisation at temperatures from 60 to 90 �C. Toproduce 10 g of the composite, 9 g of monomer were mixed with
65 ml ofMgF2-sol (0.25M) and 20 mg of benzoyl peroxide (BPO,
0.2 wt%).
FT-IR spectra of KBr pellets were recorded on a Perkin-Elmer
2000 spectrometer in transmission mode. About 250 mg of KBr
(Fluka, Germany) were pressed with 1.0–1.5 mg of the
sample and then the samples were measured in the regions
4000–400 cm�1.
NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker AVANCE 400
spectrometer at spinning speeds of 30 and 10 kHz and resonance
frequencies of 376.4 MHz and 161.9 MHz for 19F and 31P,
respectively. The methanolic sol was measured in a concentration
of 0.25 mol l�1 with 5600 accumulations.
Dynamic light scattering (DLS) experiments were performed
using a Zetasizer Nano ZS (Malvern Instruments, Worcester-
shire, UK). Hydrodynamic diameter was calculated by decon-
volution of the correlation functions into exponential functions
using the non-negatively constrained least squares (NNLS)
fitting algorithm as implemented in the Malvern Nanosizer
software. Small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) patterns were
recorded from ground samples at the mSpot beamline at BESSY
II (Helmholtz Zentrum, Berlin, Germany).19 The focusing
This journal is ª The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011
scheme of the beamline is designed to provide a divergence <1
mrad (horizontally and vertically) and a beam diameter of
roughly 100 mm at a photon flux of 5� 109 s�1 at a ring current of
100 mA. All experiments were carried out employing a wave-
length of 1.00257 �A. The scattering curves were fitted with the
program scatter20 developed by S. F€orster and L. Apostol using
a model describing the scattering intensities of hard spheres using
a Schultz-Zimm distribution with 25% polydispersity. Micro-
indenter measurements were performed on a Fischerscope
H100C (Helmut Fischer GmbH, Germany) using a diamond tip
with a load of 100 mN for 20 s. Values are given as the mean of 10
single measurements.
3. Results and discussion
Homogeneous dispersion of nanoparticles in the polymer matrix
and suppression of particle agglomeration are crucial for the
material’s optical and mechanical properties. Unfortunately,
inorganic solids and organic polymers are not properly mixable.
Due to the high surface energy of the nanoparticles as compared
to the matrix, formation of agglomerates of sol particles is
favored. By grafting alkylsilanes, carboxylic acids, or phos-
phonic acids onto particle surfaces, thus acting as tensides,
a stabilization of nanoparticles can be achieved. Furthermore, by
introducing functional groups into the organic residue, inorganic
moieties may be covalently bonded to the polymer (class-II
composites).21
Phosphonates are known to strongly complex metal ions in
a mono-, di- or tridental coordination mode. Reaction of
magnesium fluoride surfaces with phosphonic acids yielding
phosphonate complexes can involve alcoholysis or condensation
such as given in eqn (2). The sol–gel synthesis of magnesium
fluoride as used in this study starts withMg(OCH3)2 as precursor
dissolved in dry methanol. Although nanocrystalline magnesium
fluoride is formed in a stoichiometric reaction by fluorination
with anhydrous HF, some methoxide groups might still exist at
the surface of the sol particle and react with phosphonic acid.
Mg–OCH3 + HO–P(O)(OH)R / Mg–O–P(O)(OH)R
+ CH3OH (2)
R: phenyl, vinyl,.Assuming a stoichiometry of MgF2 and non-charged particles,
due to energetic reasons, magnesium fluoride particles are mainly
terminated by (110), (001) and (100) surfaces, in which each
magnesium ion is surrounded by fluorine atoms. In the sol, the
free coordination site of magnesium in the MgF2 surface might
be occupied by adsorbed methanol that might be substituted by
stronger ligands, such as phosphonates. Coordination of nega-
tively charged ions is observed by measurements of the zetapo-
tential, which shows a decrease in the potential from 37 mV of
the pure sol to 25 mV when phenylphosphonic acid is added.13
The nature of interaction between magnesium fluoride and
phosphonic acids was studied by IR and NMR. In the IR spectra
(Fig. 1), phenylphosphonic acid (PPA) coordinated to magne-
sium fluoride is shown. Magnesium fluoride itself shows only one
broad band below 700 cm�1 assigned to Mg–F vibrations. All
other bands observed originate from adsorbed phosphonic acid
species. When compared to the spectrum of pure
Nanoscale, 2011, 3, 4774–4779 | 4775
Fig. 1 FT-IR spectra of phenylphosphonic acid coordinated to
magnesium fluoride nanoparticles (a) in comparison to the pure acid (b).
Fig. 2 31P MAS NMR spectra of pure phenylphosphonic acid (a), PPA
adsorbed to magnesium fluoride sol particles in MAS NMR at 10 kHz,
na: 1184 (b), and as a methanolic sol (c) at 0.25 molar concentration, na:
5600.
Fig. 3 19F MAS NMR spectra of crystalline magnesium fluoride (a) and
phenylphosphonic acid reacted with magnesium fluoride (b), measured at
30 kHz.
Publ
ishe
d on
11
Oct
ober
201
1. D
ownl
oade
d by
Uni
vers
ity o
f M
isso
uri a
t Col
umbi
a on
17/
08/2
013
10:3
3:38
.
View Article Online
phenylphosphonic acid, changes within the fingerprint are
noticed. Absorption bands from the phosphonic acid are much
broader and indistinct, implying strong coordination to the
magnesium fluoride particles. The frequency range from 900 to
1200 cm�1 is distinctive for the identification of the coordination
mode of the phosphonic acid to the magnesium fluoride
surface.22 Bands at 1220 cm�1 and 1019 cm�1 associated to P]O
stretch and ns(P–O) respectively, which are observed in the
phosphonic acid, disappear as PPA is adsorbed to MgF2. At the
same time, P–O at 1146 cm�1 and ns(P–O) at 1119 cm�1 remain in
the spectra as is characteristic of single deprotonated phosphonic
acids. The bands at 757, 717 and 697 cm�1, which are assigned to
phenyl ring vibrations and the P–C stretch at 1489 cm�1 can also
be identified in the PPA modified MgF2 sample. The Raman
spectrum shows no emission at 959 cm�1, which would be char-
acteristic for C3v symmetry of the tridentate coordination of the
phosphonate.23 These spectroscopic data point to an adsorption
of RP(O)(OH)O�-species to under-coordinated magnesium sites
at the MgF2 surface. However, additional coordination of the
phosphoryl oxygen to Lewis acid sites at the surface of the nano-
particles cannot be ruled out completely. Similar results are
found when other phosphonic acids (butyl, octyl or vinyl) were
used for particle stabilization instead of PPA.
The 31P chemical shift in NMR can be correlated with the
coordination of the phosphonic acid to the magnesium fluoride
particle.24 While the pure phenylphosphonic acid shows a peak at
21.3 in MAS NMR (Fig. 2a), a shift of the peak maximum
towards the high field is observed. Previous studies investigating
the coordination of phosphonic acids to metal oxide particles
attributed the shifts in 31P NMR to the deprotonation and
coordination of the acid in a mono- or bidentate mode. Phe-
nylphosphonic acid reacted with magnesium fluoride particles
shows a very broad peak with a maximum at 16.4 ppm (Fig. 2b),
which is assigned to RP(O)(OH)O�. In addition to solid state
NMR, also measurements of the sols were conducted (Fig. 2c).
As for dissolved compounds, phosphonate species in solution
are expected to show a sharp signal with a width of well below
4776 | Nanoscale, 2011, 3, 4774–4779
0.1 ppm. In the case of PPA reacted with magnesium fluoride, the
NMR spectra of the sol and dried powders show almost the same
position and shape with a signal width of several ppm. The peak
broadening in liquid and solid-state NMR is a result of homo-
and heteronuclear dipolar coupling, which is not averaged by
Brownian motion or magic-angle spinning of the sample. Dis-
solved phosphonic acid or phosphonates are not observed as
superimposition of the spectra. Thus, comparison of the NMR
spectra leads to the following conclusions: (i) PPA is strongly
adsorbed to the MgF2 nanoparticle surface as single deproto-
nated phosphonate and (ii) no dissolved phosphonic acid or
phosphonate species due to equilibrium between coordination
and solvation are observed.
The 19F MAS NMR spectrum of crystalline magnesium fluo-
ride exhibits only one symmetrical peak at �198 ppm which
stands for the [MgF6]-octahedra in the rutile structure (Fig. 3,
bottom). Scholz et al. reported the correlation of the 19F NMR
chemical shift of magnesium oxide fluorides with the mean
This journal is ª The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011
Publ
ishe
d on
11
Oct
ober
201
1. D
ownl
oade
d by
Uni
vers
ity o
f M
isso
uri a
t Col
umbi
a on
17/
08/2
013
10:3
3:38
.
View Article Online
chemical composition of the first and second coordination
spheres of fluorine as probed based on the superposition model.25
When phosphonic acids coordinate to the surface of the
magnesium fluoride particle, oxygen is introduced in the prox-
imity of fluorine. As a consequence, a second peak at �180 ppm
appears when PPA is reacted with MgF2 (Fig. 3, top). Since the
ratio of surface to bulk atoms increases with decreasing particle
sizes, these species give a noticeable contribution to the NMR
spectrum. The signal of MgF2 remains unchanged, meaning that
no homogeneous product is formed by dissolution of magnesium
fluoride and crystallisation of fluorophosphonates but that PPA
is tightly bound to the particle’s surface.
Fig. 4 Photographs of composites from stabilised MgF2 (10 wt%) in
polyHEMA (left: phenylphosphonic acid, right: vinylphosphonic acid);
prepared by thermal polymerisation.
Preparation of composite materials by introducing MgF2nanoparticles into acrylate polymers
The application of non-stabilised magnesium fluoride sols for the
preparation of nanocomposite films was not successful at all due
to agglomeration of the inorganic particles and thus loss of
optical transparency and gelation of the monomer/magnesium
fluoride mixture limiting its processability. When phosphonic
acids are used to stabilise the nanoparticles from agglomeration,
transparent dispersions of nanoparticles in the monomer were
obtained, which can be applied for the preparation of thin films
on glass or silicon substrates by spin- or dip-coating techniques.
Even bulk composites can be obtained by this procedure yielding
transparent composites. The size distributions of the sol particles
in methanol and in HEMA (2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) are
listed in Table 1.
In DLS, an increase of hydrodynamic diameters is observed
when the solvent is exchanged by HEMA. For the case of pure
magnesium fluoride, agglomeration as seen by turbidity of the
dispersion is identified by shift of the correlation function
towards longer decay times. Determination of the particle size is
not advisable, due to large polydispersity of this sample. When
particles are stabilised by phosphonic acids, agglomeration of the
particles is effectively suppressed. Only a slight increase of the
particle size is noticed.
Fig. 4 shows two samples, each with a magnesium fluoride
content of 10 wt% in a polyHEMA matrix but using different
phosphonic acids for stabilisation of the nanoparticles. Although
the samples are several mm thick, both samples are obviously
highly transparent. If non-stabilized nanoparticles were used for
the preparation of the composites in the same way, agglomera-
tion takes place, which inevitably leads to intransparent and
brittle samples. Because magnesium fluoride and the phosphonic
acids are transparent in the UV-vis and light scattering is negli-
gible, spectra of both composites show no significant changes by
introduction of the magnesium fluoride nanoparticles when
compared to the pure polymer.
Table 1 Hydrodynamic diameters of MgF2 particles in methanolic soland dispersed in HEMA, determined by DLS
Methanolic sol MgF2 dispersed in HEMA
Non-stabilised 10–20 nm13 n.d.PA stabilised 2–3 nm 3–5 nm
This journal is ª The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011
When phenylphosphonic acid modified particles (Fig. 4, left)
are embedded in the polymer, hydroxyl groups of HEMA might
interact with the remaining P–OH from the phosphonic acid and/
or coordinate to the MgF2 surface. However, spectroscopic
investigations do not give any evidence for this hypothesis.
Introduction of polymerisable groups, such as vinyl in the case of
VPA-stabilised particles (Fig. 4, right), co-polymerisation with
HEMA can be expected giving composites of class II according
to the classification of Sanchez et al. Raman investigations prove
complete polymerisation of HEMA as the band at 1638 cm�1,
corresponding to the C]C double bond, can no longer be
identified (ESI†). Thus, introduction of magnesium fluoride
nanoparticles does not influence the degree of polymerization.
Unfortunately, the concentration of vinylphosphonic acid in the
sample is too small to record any Raman bands in order to
determine the degree of polymerization with the acrylate.
Dispersion of nanoparticles inside the polyHEMA matrix
A high degree of dispersion of nanoparticles in the polymer
matrix is relevant for (i) optical transparency and (ii) mechanical
properties. Considering the transparency of the composite
samples in Fig. 4, with no significant Rayleigh scattering, the
particle size should be below 20 nm, meaning that agglomeration
was effectively suppressed by surface modification using PPA or
VPA. Small-angle X-ray scattering experiments give integral
information on the size distribution of nanoparticles in the
polymer matrix. Fig. 5 shows the SAXS patterns of ground
nanocomposite from PPA stabilised magnesium fluoride (10 wt
%) in a PolyHEMAmatrix. The evaluation of the SAXS patterns
recorded is rather difficult because of the broad particle size
distribution and irregularly shaped magnesium fluoride particles.
Nevertheless, the scattering curves can be interpreted as super-
imposition of the respective scattering curves of hard spheres
with different sizes, the scattering intensities of which are given
by the Schultz-Zimm distribution. This approach seems reason-
able in this case due to high polydispersity of the nanocrystalline
MgF2 particles and spherical shape in TEM. As seen from the
comparison with the pattern expected for 4 nm sized magnesium
fluoride particles with 25% polydispersity, the measured SAXS
pattern is described quite well for the higher q values. Larger
particles with a size of approximately 10–20 nm are identified at
Nanoscale, 2011, 3, 4774–4779 | 4777
Fig. 5 SAXS pattern of PPA stabilized MgF2 nanoparticles in poly-
HEMA at 10 wt% content and approximation of the scattering curve
using Schultz–Zimm distribution of 4 nm sized spherical particles with
25% polydispersity.
Table 2 Martens hardness (MH), storage modulus (G0), penetrationdepth (PD) and initial surface hardness (ISH), determined by micro-indentation measurements, in dependence of filler content
MgF2
content (wt%) MH/N mm�2 G0/Gpa PD/mm ISH/N mm�2
0% 107 2.2 5.77 1495% 167 2.8 4.51 2177.5% 207 3.4 4.10 31610% 192 3.2 4.26 27115% 222 3.8 3.95 23520% 208 3.6 4.09 241
Fig. 6 Diagram of Martens hardness versus content of VPA- (black
circles) and PPA-(gray squares) MgF2 in polyHDDMA, determined by
microindentation.
Publ
ishe
d on
11
Oct
ober
201
1. D
ownl
oade
d by
Uni
vers
ity o
f M
isso
uri a
t Col
umbi
a on
17/
08/2
013
10:3
3:38
.
View Article Online
lower q. Agglomerates were not observed. TEM images of
ultramicrotome slices of these materials also show non-agglom-
erated magnesium fluoride particles in the polymer matrix, which
are identified by their crystal lattice plane distances (ESI†).
Turbid composites containing larger particles show an increasing
scattering curve at smaller q values, which indicates agglomera-
tion during preparation and processing. Vinylphosphonic acid
stabilized MgF2 particles in polyHEMA exhibit a scattering
pattern comparable to Fig. 5 (ESI†).
Homogeneous distribution of magnesium and fluorine over
the whole sample was proved by EDX measurements (not
shown). A consolidated view of all these factors indicates well
dispersed, isolated primary particles and small agglomerates
inside the polymer matrix when phosphonic acid stabilized
magnesium fluoride sols are used for the preparation of the
composites. In the case of non-stabilized nanoparticles partial
agglomeration is observed, which leads to a loss of transparency
of the composite material.
Investigation of surface hardness and E0 modulus by
microindentation
Based on the same procedure, composites with other acrylate
matrices, such as isobornylmethacrylate or 1,6-hexanediol
dimethacrylate (HDDMA), were also successfully prepared,
giving fully transparent films or bulk materials. The influence of
different amounts of VPA-stabilised MgF2 nanoparticles in the
HDDMA matrix was evaluated by microindentation measure-
ments. The response of the composite to the indentation of
a diamond tip pressed into the surface under defined load (100
mN) and time (20 s) is recorded in relation to the penetration
depth. Several specific parameters can be derived from the
hardness-depth curves, such as Martens hardness (MH), initial
surface hardness, penetration depth and storage modulus (G0)(Table 2). Fig. 6 illustrates the increase of Martens hardness as
a function of the MgF2 content in the composite. While as
prepared PolyHDDMA has a Martens hardness of 107 N mm�2,
only small amounts of nanoscopic magnesium fluoride already
4778 | Nanoscale, 2011, 3, 4774–4779
result in a strong increase of surface hardness. A maximum
Martens hardness is reached at a filler content of 15 wt%
exceeding the initial value by the factor of 2. Simultaneously the
initial surface hardness is increased as a consequence of MgF2
nanoparticle introduction into the acrylate matrix and penetra-
tion depth is reduced as hardness is increased. The storage
modulus of elastic deformation (G0), derived from the first part of
the hardness–depth curve, also shows the same increase from
initially 2.2 MPa with raising the MgF2 content up to 3.8 MPa
at 15 wt%.
4. Conclusion
The preparation of transparent nanocomposite materials with
a high dispersion of magnesium fluoride in the polymer matrix is
a quite challenging task. Without adequate stabilisation,
agglomeration of the MgF2 nano-particles and thus phase
separation and loss of desired properties are observed. In the
course of the previously studied agglomeration behaviour of sol–
gel derived MgF2 nanoparticles13 we found that phosphonic
acids are able to coordinate to the surface of the inorganic
particles and stabilise primary particles with a hydrodynamic
radius of 2–3 nm in methanolic sols. Based on the present IR,
Raman, and NMR investigations it is evident that single
deprotonated phosphonates strongly coordinate to
This journal is ª The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011
Publ
ishe
d on
11
Oct
ober
201
1. D
ownl
oade
d by
Uni
vers
ity o
f M
isso
uri a
t Col
umbi
a on
17/
08/2
013
10:3
3:38
.
View Article Online
undercoordinated magnesium sites in the surface of the nano-
scopic MgF2.particles. Thus, stabilisation of primary particles is
attributed to energetic relaxation of the magnesium fluoride
surfaces and steric effects of the phosphonic acids rather than
electrostatic repulsion of the sol particles. As a consequence, such
MgF2 nanoparticle dispersions are much more stable when
compared to non-stabilised particles. DLS experiments reveal
that the hydrodynamic diameter of these sol particles increases
only slightly when the solvent is exchanged by acrylate mono-
mers. Thus, transparent dispersions of MgF2 nanoparticles with
a content of 20 wt% and more are obtained, which can be used
for the preparation of optically transparent thin films or bulk
composite materials. SAXS and TEM measurements evidence
particles with a size of about 4 nm, which are finely dispersed in
the polymer matrix. Agglomerates are not identified.
The influence on mechanical properties of the composite
materials was evaluated by microindentation analysis and shows
a distinct increase of Martens hardness and the elastic storage
modulus G0 by introduction of nanoMgF2 (up to 20 wt%). Thus,
based on this procedure using phosphonic acid stabilised
magnesium fluoride nanoparticles, wide adaptability towards the
preparation of nanocomposites either as thin films or bulk
materials with high particle dispersion and transparency is
demonstrated. Mechanical properties are significantly altered by
introduction of little amounts of magnesium fluoride
nanoparticles.
Acknowledgements
Gudrun Scholz and Michael Teltewskoi (Humboldt-Universit€at
zu Berlin) are kindly acknowledged for conducting the NMR
measurements. We thank Franziska Emmerling (BAM Federal
Institute for Materials Research and Testing, Berlin) for SAXS
measurements of the composite. J. N. and E. K. are grateful for
financial support from ABCR GmbH (Karlsruhe, Germany). J.
N. is a member of the graduate school ‘‘Fluorine as key element’’
(GRK 1582) of Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DFG.
This journal is ª The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011
Notes and references
1 L. Nicole, L. Rozes and C. Sanchez, Adv. Mater., 2010, 22, 3208–3214.
2 L. Sun, R. F. Gibson, F. Gordaninejad and J. Suhr, Compos. Sci.Technol., 2009, 69, 2392–2409.
3 T. R. Hull, A. A. Stec and S. Nazare, J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol., 2009,9, 4478–4486.
4 S. Yano, K. Iwata and K. Kurita,Mater. Sci. Eng., C, 1998, 6, 75–90.5 G. Kickelbick, J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol., 2008, 46, 281–290.6 H. Althues, J. Henle and S. Kaskel, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2007, 36, 1454–1465.
7 M. M. Demir, P. Castignolles, €U. Akbey and G. Wegner,Macromolecules, 2007, 40, 4190–4198.
8 W. Posthumus, P. C. M. M. Magusin, J. C. M. Brokken-Zijp,A. H. A. Tinnemans and R. van der Linde, J. Colloid Interface Sci.,2004, 269, 109–116.
9 F. Bauer, H.-J. Gl€asel, U. Decker, H. Ernst, A. Freyer, E. Hartmann,V. Sauerland and R. Mehnert, Prog. Org. Coat., 2003, 47, 147–153.
10 H. Althues, P. P€otschke, G.-M. Kim and S. Kaskel, J. Nanosci.Nanotechnol., 2009, 9, 2739–2745.
11 U. Schubert, J. Mater. Chem., 2005, 15, 3701–3715.12 M. M. Demir, K. Koynov, €U. Akbey, C. Bubeck, I. Park,
I. Lieberwirth and G. Wegner, Macromolecules, 2007, 40, 1089–1100.13 J. Noack, F. Emmerling, H. Kirmse and E. Kemnitz, J.Mater. Chem.,
2011, 21, 15015–15021.14 H. Kr€uger, E. Kemnitz, A. Hertwig and U. Beck, Thin Solid Films,
2008, 516, 4175–4177.15 H. Kr€uger, A. Hertwig, U. Beck and E. Kemnitz, Thin Solid Films,
2010, 518, 6080–6086.16 B. M. Novak, Adv. Mater., 1993, 5, 422–433.17 E. Kemnitz, U. Groß, S. R€udiger and C. S. Shekar, Angew. Chem.,
2003, 115, 4383–4386; Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2003, 42, 4251–4254.18 S. R€udiger and E. Kemnitz, Dalton Trans., 2008, 1117–1127.19 O. Paris, C. Li, S. Siegel, G. Weseloh, F. Emmerling, H. Riesemeier,
A. Erko and P. Fratzl, J. Appl. Crystallogr., 2006, 40, s466–s470.20 Program Scatter.exe (version 0.4) is available free of charge from:
http://www.chemie.uni-hamburg.de/pc/sfoerster/software.html.21 C. Sanchez and F. Ribot, New J. Chem., 1994, 18, 1007–1047.22 P. Persson, E. Laiti and L.-O. €Ohman, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 1997,
190, 341–349.23 S. Haque, I. Rehman and J. A. Darr, Langmuir, 2007, 23, 6671–6676.24 G. P. Holland, R. Sharma, J. O. Agola, S. Amin, V. C. Solomon,
P. Singh, D. A. Buttry and J. L. Yarger, Chem. Mater., 2007, 19,2519–2526.
25 G. Scholz, C. Stosiek, J. Noack and E. Kemnitz, J. Fluorine Chem.,2011, 132, 1079–1085.
Nanoscale, 2011, 3, 4774–4779 | 4779