Upload
lamminh
View
228
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
School of ChemistryPriestley Laboratory
One-Day Practical Coursefor Year 12 Students
Inorganic Experiments
www.chem.leeds.ac.uk
Twitter: @scienceLeeds
1
COSHH Assessment
Section: Priestley Laboratory Experiment: Preparation and Analysis of Ammonium Iron (II)
Sulfate
Personnel Involved: Year 12 students, laboratory demonstrators, laboratory staff
Chemical Hazard Precautions Disposal
Iron (II) sulfate heptahydrate Harmful if swallowed
Irritating to eyes and skin
Wear gloves
Avoid breathing
dust
In a fumehood
dilute with
water and flush
down sink
Sulfuric acid (1 M) Corrosive Wear gloves In a fumehood
dilute with
water and flush
down sink
Ammonium sulfate Not classified as a hazardous substance In a fumehood
dilute with
water and flush
down sink
chemical waste
Ammonium iron (II) sulfate
hexahydrate
Irritating to eyes skin and
respiratory system
Wear gloves
Avoid breathing
dust
In a fumehood
dilute with
water and flush
down sink
Iron (III) chloride solution
(0.05 M)
Harmful
Corrosive
Wear gloves In a fumehood
dilute with
water and flush
down sink
Ammonia solution (2 M) Causes burns
Irritating vapour
Toxic to aquatic organisms
Wear gloves
Avoid breathing
vapour
In a fumehood
dilute with
water and flush
down sink
Potassium manganate(VII)
solution (0.02 M)
Oxidising agent
Toxic to aquatic organisms
Wear gloves In a fumehood
dilute with
water and flush
down sink
2
Chemical Hazard Precautions Disposal
1,10-Phenanthroline
solution (0.006 M)
Toxic if swallowed
Toxic to aquatic organisms
Wear gloves
Avoid breathing
vapour
In a fumehood
dilute with
water and
flush down
sink
Potassium hexacyanoferrate
(II) solution
Harmful
Contact with acid liberates
toxic gases
Wear gloves Metal waste in
waste
fumehood
Potassium hexacyanoferrate
(III) solution
Harmful
Contact with acid liberates
toxic gases
Wear gloves Metal waste in
waste
fumehood
Hydroxylamine
hydrochloride
Harmful in contact with
skin and if swallowed
Irritating to eyes and skin
Potential carcinogen
May cause sensitisation
Toxic to aquatic organisms
Wear gloves
Avoid breathing
vapour
Acetone waste
Sodium ethanoate trihydrate Not classified as a hazardous substance In a fumehood
dilute with
water and
flush down
sink
Other Hazards None
Emergency action If chemicals come into contact with eyes or skin,immediately wash thoroughly with copious water.
Report incident to laboratory demonstrator.
3
Schedule10:30 – 13:00 Preparation of Mohr’s salt and test tube reactions13:00 – 14:00 Lunch14:00 – 15:30 Analysis of Mohr’s salt
Preparation and Analysis of Mohr’s Salt: Ammonium Iron (II) Sulfate Hexahydrate
Reaction Overview:
The element iron forms many compounds containing Fe2+ or Fe3+, also written as Fe(II) or Fe(III).
Mohr’s Salt (ammonium iron(II) sulfate hexahydrate) is often employed as an analytical standard,
and has been used in a variety of other applications from nanomaterials to general redox reactions.
In this experiment you will mix solutions of iron(II) sulfate and ammonium sulfate to obtain pale
blue-green crystals of Mohr’s salt.
Mohrs salt is an example of a ‘double salt’, i.e. it contains the same ions as in FeSO4.7H2O and
(NH4)2(SO4). It is simple to prepare because it is less soluble than either of its constituent salts. A
double salt in solution displays the chemistries of its component ions because no new chemical
bonds are formed.
The salt is named after the German chemist Karl Friedrich Mohr, who made many important
advances in the methodology of titration in the 19th century. It is preferred over iron(II) sulfate for
titrations as it is less prone to oxidation by air. The oxidation of iron(II) to iron(III) occurs more
rapidly at higher pH; Mohr’s Salt lowers the pH of solutions slightly.
Objectives
The aims of this experiment are:
1. To prepare Mohr’s salt, ammonium iron(II) sulfate hexahydrate,
2. To investigate some aqueous reactions of iron(II) and iron(III) compounds.
3. To analyse your compound by a redox titration with potassium manganate(VII).
4. To analyse your compound by spectrophotometry.
4
Part 1: Preparation of Mohr’s salt
The method described here involves the simple mixing of solutions of FeSO4.7H2O and (NH4)2(SO4),
followed by an evaporation, a crystallisation, and finally a filtration.
For this part of the experiment, you should work in a fumehood.
Place a clean 100 mL beaker onto a top-pan balance, and set the display to read zero; this is known
as taring the balance. Weigh directly into the beaker iron(II) sulfate heptahydrate (FeSO4.7H2O;
12.5 g) from the reagent bottle. Remove the beaker from the balance and carefully add dilute
(1 M) sulfuric acid (5 mL), and deionised water (10 mL). Heat the beaker on a stirrer hotplate,
stirring with a magnetic follower until all of the solid has dissolved. You should obtain a clear, pale
green solution.
Place a second clean 100 mL beaker onto a top-pan balance and tare the balance. Weigh directly
into the beaker ammonium sulfate [(NH4)2(SO4); 6 g]. Remove the beaker from the balance and
add deionised water (8 mL). Heat the beaker on a stirrer hotplate, stirring with a magnetic
follower until all of the solid has dissolved. You should obtain a colourless solution.
Carefully pour the contents of the beaker containing the solution of iron(II) sulfate into the beaker
containing the ammonium sulfate solution. The combined volume should be approximately 30 mL.
Heat the beaker to boiling until the initially opaque green solution becomes clear.
Note: Do not let the beaker boil dry.
The final solution should be a blue-green colour, and contains your product. You will isolate your
product by crystallisation, one of the most important purification techniques in synthetic
chemistry. Cool your beaker first to room temperature, and then in an ice-water bath.
Note: It is a good idea to gently clamp your beaker in place in the cooling bath to ensure it does
not tip over, losing your product.
1. Calculate the amount, in moles, of 12.5 g of FeSO4.7H2O. The relative atomic masses
are: H (1), N (14), O (16), S (32), and Fe (56).
5
2. Determine the theoretical (maximum) yield (in g) of (NH4)2Fe(SO4)2.6H2O.
You should complete Part 2 of the experiment, ‘Test-Tube Reactions of Iron(II) and Iron(III) using
the (NH4)2Fe(SO4)2.6H2O provided, before performing the filtration below.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Collect your product by vacuum filtration using a Buchner filtration flask and a small Buchner or
Hirsch funnel (See Figure 1, overleaf). Pour your suspension quickly onto the filter. Add cold
deionised water (10 mL) to the residue in the beaker, swirl the solid around and pour quickly onto
the filter. Repeat this until you have washed all of the solid out of the beaker.Finally wash the solid
on the filter quickly with 10 mL of cold deionised water from a beaker.
Transfer the product onto a 15 cm filter paper, spread the crystals out, cover with a second filter
paper and press gently to dry the crystals. Remove the top paper and leave the product to dry in
air.
Transfer your dry product to a clean, labelled and tared watch glass and record the weight of your
product on a top-pan balance.
3. Calculate the percentage yield of your ammonium iron(II) sulfate hexahydrate.
7
Part 2: Test-Tube Reactions of Iron(II) and Iron(III)
A metal complex can be formed when a molecule containing an atom with a lone-pair of electrons
is able to form a donor bond (also called a coordinate bond) to the metal ion. The molecule is called
a ligand, and typical simple ligands are H2O, NH3 and Cl–.
Larger molecules may form bonds from two or more atoms at the same time. Such a molecule is
called a chelate, and is bidentate, tridentate or polydentate if it forms 2, 3 or many bonds
respectively. 1,10-Phenanthroline is an example of a bidentate ligand:
A metal ion in aqueous solution can be represented by Mn+(aq), where (aq) denotes the solvation of
the metal ion by the ligand molecules of water. This is also in fact a complex with typically six water
molecules around the metal ion. The formation of a different complex ion involves a ligand
substitution reaction. A complex ion may also react to form an insoluble compound.
In the following scheme the metal ion M2+(aq) in the presence of OH– ions and the ligands L and L′
will form the insoluble hydroxide M(OH)2 or either of the complex ions (MLn)2+ or (ML'n)2+ depending
on the relative values of the solubility product (Ksp) and the two stability constants K and K′
respectively:
When K is very large, complex formation is virtually complete and is insensitive to ligand
concentration. For low K, complex formation is sensitive to changes in ligand concentration, and
hence is reversible (in equilibrium).
8
Transition elements have d-orbitals of low energy which result in more diversity in forming chemical
bonds and a greater variety of stable oxidation states than main group metals. The formation of a
complex is often accompanied by a change in colour which our eyes can see clearly.
Procedure
In all of the test-tube experiments in this section, the graduation marks on the plastic dropping
pipettes provided (top mark = 3 mL) are sufficiently accurate when measuring out the reagents for
the test reactions.
You are provided with an approximately 0.05 M solution of iron(III) chloride.
Make up a 0.05 M solution of ammonium iron(II) sulfate hexahydrate by dissolving 0.4 g of the
sample provided in 20 mL of deionised water.
Reaction of Fe(II) and Fe(III) with ammonia solution.
Pipette 2 mL of the 0.05 M FeCl3 solution into a test-tube and add 20 drops of 2 M ammonia
solution. Record your observations below.
Pipette 2 mL of the 0.05 M ammonium iron(II) sulfate solution into a test-tube and add 20 drops of
2 M ammonia solution. Record your observations below.
9
4. Write simple ionic equations for the reactions of ammonia solution with iron(II) and iron(III)
ions in aqueous solution.
Remember that when dissolved in water, ammonia reacts to produce ammonium and
hydroxide ions.
Reaction of Fe(II) and Fe(III) with potassium hexacyanoferrate(III) solution and potassium
hexacyanoferrate(II) solution.
These tests rely on the formation of the insoluble Prussian blue complex: Fe7(CN)18.xH2O (x = 14-
16).
Pipette 2 mL of the 0.05 M ammonium iron(II) sulfate solution into a test-tube and add 1 mL of
potassium hexacyanoferrate(III) solution.Record your observations below.
Pipette 2 mL of the 0.05 M ammonium iron(II) sulfate solution into a test-tube and add 1 mL of
potassium hexacyanoferrate(II) solution. Record your observations below.
10
Pipette 2 mL of the 0.05 M iron(III) chloride solution into a test-tube and add 1 mL potassium
hexacyanoferrate(III) solution. Record your observations below.
Pipette 2 mL of the 0.05 M iron(III) chloride solution into a test-tube and add 1 mL potassium
hexacyanoferrate(II) solution. Record your observations below.
5. A diseased biological tissue sample needs to be tested for iron. Using your observations
from the tests above, explain how you could use the formation of Prussian blue complex to
determine whether the sample contained mainly Fe(II) or Fe(III).
11
Reaction of iron(II) with potassium manganate(VII).
This observation will form the basis of the quantitative analysis carried out in Part 3.
Pipette 2 mL of the 0.05 M ammonium iron(II) sulfate solution into a test-tube and add 10 drops of
1 M sulfuric acid. Add 10 drops of 0.02 M potassium manganate(VII) solution. Record your
observations below.
6. Explain what happens when a solution of iron(II) reacts with an acidified solution of
potassium manganate(VII).
The following half equation may help:
Reaction of iron(II) and 1,10-phenanthroline.
This observation will form the basis of the quantitative analysis carried out in Part 4.
In a 10 mL measuring cylinder, dilute 1mL of your 0.05 M solution of ammonium iron(II) sulfate
hexahydrate to 10 mL with deionised water. Add your diluted solution to a depth of 1cm in a test-
tube. Then add up to three times that volume of the approximately 0.006 M solution of 1,10-
phenanthroline. Record your observations on the next page.
12
7. Give an equation to describe what you observe when 1,10-phenanthroline (o-phen) is
added to the iron(II) solution.
Note: Iron(II) reacts to give the complex [Fe(o-phen)3]2+.
Return to Part 1 to filter off your product, which you will use this afternoon.
In Parts 3 and 4 you will determine the percentage by mass of iron in your sample of ammonium
iron(II) sulfate: (NH4)2Fe(SO4)2.6H2O. You can then compare the results obtained from the two
methods.
END OF MORNING SESSION
13
Part 3: Iron(II) Analysis by Titration with Manganate(VII)
The concentration of iron(II) is determined here by volumetric analysis involving a manganate(VII)
redox titration. The manganate(VII) oxidises iron(II) to iron(III). Note that no indicator is required for
this titration. Due to the intense colour of the manganate(VII) ion, the titration is self indicating as
the first drop of excess reagent gives rise to a permanent pink colouration of the titration solution.
The relevant half equations for the redox titration are:
By eliminating electrons we obtain the equivalence:
(MnO4)– 5Fe2+
Procedure
In Parts 1 and 2 you used a top-pan balance that can only weigh to the nearest 0.01 g. For a
chemical analysis you need to use an analytical balance with an accuracy of 0.0001 g. Chemicals
should never be transferred directly to a vessel on an analytical balance. Spillage of chemicals will
damage the sensitive (and expensive!) instrument.
Using the top-pan balance, weigh out into a tared weighing bottle around 1.0 ± 0.1 g of your
ammonium iron(II) sulfate hexahydrate. Carefully clean up any spillage.
Take the weighing bottle to the analytical balance. Tare the balance and obtain the accurate
combined mass of the weighing bottle and your sample for analysis. Record your results in the
table on the next page.
Transfer your sample from the weighing bottle to the into a freshly rinsed 250 mL conical flask. (It
does not matter if a few fragments of the sample remain in the bottle).
Weigh accurately (using the analytical balance) the now empty weighing bottle and determine the
accurate mass of your transferred analysis sample. Record your results in the table on the next
page.
14
Weighings Titration 1 Titration 2 Titration 3
Mass of weighing bottle + sample
Mass of empty weighing bottle
By difference: mass transferred
Add 50 mL of 1 M sulfuric acid to your ammonium iron(II) sulfate hexahydrate in the conical flask
and swirl to dissolve. Position the flask on a white tile underneath the burette of standard
potassium manganate(VII) solution. Record the accurate molarity of the standard manganate(VII)
solution.
Exact molarity of potassium manganate(VII) solution: ______ M
With gentle swirling, titrate the solution of iron(II) until a pale pink ‘end-point’ is observed. Record
your burette readings below. Repeat the measurement at least twice on separate weighed
samples.
Burette readings Titration 1 Titration 2 Titration 3
Initial burette reading
(mL)
Final burette reading
(mL)
Volume of titre (mL)
Mass/Titre
In this method of titration, the volume of titre should differ, but the calculated value of mass/titre
should be consistent. You may consider the results consistent if they agree with each other to
within 2%.
15
Calculation of the mass of iron in your sample.
8. Calculate the number of moles of manganate(VII) in your titre
(molarity x titre/1000).
9. From the moles of manganate(VII) calculated above, calculate the number of moles of iron
in your mass of ammonium iron(II) sulfate hexahydrate and convert the number of moles of
iron into the corresponding mass of iron (mass = moles x atomic weight of iron). (Atomic
weight of iron = 55.847).
Remember (MnO4)– 5Fe2+
10. Calculate the experimental percentage by mass of iron in your sample of ammonium iron(II)
sulfate hexahydrate.
The atomic weights are: H (1.0079), N(14.0067), O (15.9994), S (32.064), Fe (55.847)
16
11. Calculate the theoretical value for the percentage by mass of iron in ammonium iron(II)
sulfate hexahydrate, and compare it with the experimental value.
Part 4: Iron Analysis by Spectrophotometry
In absorption spectrophotometry we measure the absorbance at certain wavelengths of light. λmax
is the wavelength of the maximum absorbance.
At a given wavelength the absorbance measured, A, is often directly proportional to concentration:
this is known as the "Beer Lambert Law":
A = ε c l
where ε is the molar extinction coefficient (litre mol-1 cm-1)
c is the concentration of the absorbing species (mol litre-1)
l is the path length of the cell (cm)
A is the absorbance (dimensionless).
The molar extinction coefficient, ε, provides a measure of the sensitivity of absorbance.
350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750
Wavelength in nm
A
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
blue green red
350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750
Wavelength in nm
A
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
blue green red
17
It is possible to produce a calibration graph using solutions of known concentration, and this can
then be used to find the concentration in any number of other ‘unknown’ solutions.
Procedure
Preparation of a ‘stock’ solution of iron(II) ammonium sulfate of ‘unknown’ iron concentration.
Measure 1 M dilute sulfuric acid (50 mL) into a clean freshly rinsed, one litre volumetric flask.
Weigh accurately (use an analytical balance) about 0.140 g of your iron(II) ammonium sulfate
using a clean weighing bottle. Carefully transfer all of the solid through a funnel into the one litre
volumetric flask. Record your results in the table below.
Weigh accurately (use an analytical balance) the empty weighing bottle in order to calculate, by
difference, the accurate mass transferred to the flask. Wash deionised water through the funnel
into the flask. Gently shake the flask until all the solid has dissolved, and finally make up to the
mark with more deionised water. Record your results in the table below.
Mass of weighing bottle + sample (g)
Mass of weighing bottle (g)
Mass of sample transferred (g)
Determination of the wavelength of maximum absorbance, λmax, for Fe(o-phen)3]2+.
Preparation of solutions of reagents.
In a 50 mL beaker, dissolve hydroxylamine hydrochloride, (1.0 g) in water (10 mL).
In a 250 mL beaker, dissolve sodium ethanoate trihydrate (17 g), in water (100 mL).
Concentration
A
18
You require four 100 mL volumetric flasks. Into three of the flasks, pipette respectively 25, 10, 5 mL
of your ‘stock’ solution of iron(II) ammonium sulfate. The last flask will be used as a blank.
To each flask (including the ‘blank’ flask) in turn add:
1 mL of your previously prepared hydroxylamine hydrochloride solution (using a 10 mL measuring
cylinder)
10 mL of your sodium ethanoate solution (use a 25 mL measuring cylinder)
10 mL of the 1,10-phenanthroline solution provided (use a 25 mL measuring cylinder)
Allow the mixtures to stand for 5 minutes before diluting carefully to the mark in each flask with
deionised water and shake to mix the solutions well.
Obtain a visible spectrum of the solution of the [Fe(o-phen)3]2+ complex with highest
concentration.
Take all of the solutions to the UV/vis spectrophotometer. You will be shown how to use the
scanning UV/vis spectrophotometer. Using the solution with the highest concentration of the
[Fe(o-phen)3]2+ complex, rinse the 1 cm cell provided with a little of the solution, and then fill the
cell to within 1cm of the top. Insert the cell into the sample holder of the instrument as instructed.
Insert a second cell containing your blank solution into the reference beam. The
spectrophotometer will produce an absorption scan over the range 350 - 850 nm (i.e. the visible
region). From this spectrum of the [Fe(o-phen)3]2+ complex solution, determine the λmax value.
This should be close to 510 nm.
Measured λmax value of solution
19
Absorbance measurements.
Take all four solutions to a second instrument which is a non-scanning (fixed wavelength)
spectrophotometer. You will be shown how to use the instrument. Select the wavelength to be
that of λmax for the complex as determined above. Using your blank solution as reference, measure
the absorbance of each of the three red solutions of the
[Fe(o-phen)3]2+ complex. Take an average of at least two readings for each solution.
Volume of ‘stock’ solution 5 mL 10 mL 25 mL
1st determination
2nd determination
Average value
Calculation of the iron concentration.
From A = ε c l (and with a path length of l = 1 cm), a graph of A versus c will have a gradient of ε =
A/c. The molar extinction coefficient, ε, for the [Fe(o-phen)3]2+ complex is known to be 1.08 x
104 litre mol–1 cm–1.
12. Draw a graph of absorbance (y axis), against ‘volume of unknown stock’ solution (x axis)
(i.e. 5, 10 or 25 mL), for your three red solutions of the [Fe(o-phen)3]2+ complex. Because
you used a blank to set the instrument reference, you can use the origin as a point on your
graph, and draw a straight line from the origin to best fit your data. From your graph find
the absorbance, A, at a concentration of 25 mL.
Note: This may not correspond exactly to the experimental value for this solution
A at 25 mL = ______
20
13. From A / (25x/100) = 1.08 x 104 litre mol-1 cm-1, you can obtain a value for x, the
concentration x in mol litre-1 of iron in your ‘stock’ solution of iron(II) ammonium sulfate.
14. You now know both the accurate mass of iron(II) ammonium sulfate which is dissolved in
the litre of ‘stock’ solution, and also the concentration of iron in mol litre–1. Calculate the
mass of iron dissolved in the litre, and hence the percentage by mass of iron in your iron(II)
ammonium sulfate sample (atomic weight 55.847).
15. Compare the percentage mass of iron in your sample obtained by spectrophotometry and
titration. Which of the methods do you think is more accurate and why?
Percentage mass of iron by spectrophotometry =
Percentage mass of iron by manganate(VII) titration (Part 3) =
END OF AFTERNOON SESSION