13
INNOVATION ENGINE 2.0: 2020-2021 UPDATE Office of Transformation and Innovation

INNOVATION ENGINE 2.0: 2020-2021 UPDATEfile... · 3 Score Points 1: Weak response. Little or no evidence 2: Basic Response. Minimal evidence 3: Strong Response. Examples of evidence

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: INNOVATION ENGINE 2.0: 2020-2021 UPDATEfile... · 3 Score Points 1: Weak response. Little or no evidence 2: Basic Response. Minimal evidence 3: Strong Response. Examples of evidence

INNOVATION ENGINE 2.0: 2020-2021 UPDATE

Office of Transformation and Innovation

Page 2: INNOVATION ENGINE 2.0: 2020-2021 UPDATEfile... · 3 Score Points 1: Weak response. Little or no evidence 2: Basic Response. Minimal evidence 3: Strong Response. Examples of evidence

PAGE

An Office of Transformation and Innovation funding program that annually provides up to 20 (+1) Dallas ISD neighborhood schools with $50,000 each to support them in exploring and implementing an innovative program or initiative.

Innovation Engine 2.0

2

Page 3: INNOVATION ENGINE 2.0: 2020-2021 UPDATEfile... · 3 Score Points 1: Weak response. Little or no evidence 2: Basic Response. Minimal evidence 3: Strong Response. Examples of evidence

PAGEOffice of Transformation and Innovation 3

INNOVATION ENGINE 2.0 PROOF OF CONCEPT

Small exercise to test a design idea (feasibility), pilot an idea.

LAUNCH A NEW INNOVATION MODEL

EXPLORE / SCALE EXISTING INNOVATIVE

School plans to deepen or expand on campus, perhaps by adding new components or extending grade levels.

MS REDESIGN

Page 4: INNOVATION ENGINE 2.0: 2020-2021 UPDATEfile... · 3 Score Points 1: Weak response. Little or no evidence 2: Basic Response. Minimal evidence 3: Strong Response. Examples of evidence

PAGE

Office of Transformation and InnovationINNOVATION ENGINE 2.0 APPS

4

Page 5: INNOVATION ENGINE 2.0: 2020-2021 UPDATEfile... · 3 Score Points 1: Weak response. Little or no evidence 2: Basic Response. Minimal evidence 3: Strong Response. Examples of evidence

PAGE 5

SELECTION PROCESSRound 1

Written Review

Cross-departmental review committee evaluating using

Innovation Engine rubric.

Deputy Chief, Racial Equity Office & ED Recommendations

Review and Deputy Chiefs rank applications rubric scores,

leadership capacity, quadrants of the city.

Superintendent & Executive Leadership Final Selections

Review and approval of final recommendations.

Round 2 Round 3

Page 6: INNOVATION ENGINE 2.0: 2020-2021 UPDATEfile... · 3 Score Points 1: Weak response. Little or no evidence 2: Basic Response. Minimal evidence 3: Strong Response. Examples of evidence

3 Sections● Campus Summary ● Implementation Plan● Budget

3 Score Points● 1: Weak response. Little or no evidence● 2: Basic Response. Minimal evidence● 3: Strong Response. Examples of evidence

Scoring Rubric

6

Page 7: INNOVATION ENGINE 2.0: 2020-2021 UPDATEfile... · 3 Score Points 1: Weak response. Little or no evidence 2: Basic Response. Minimal evidence 3: Strong Response. Examples of evidence

Cross-departmental Written Reviews● 23 scorers from 10 departments

○ Quality of Overall Application

OTI / REO Review● Racial Equity Collaboration

○ Quadrants of the City ○ Racial Equity

OTI / School Leadership Review● School Leadership Collaboration

○ Leadership Readiness ○ School Capacity to Innovate○ Community Connection

Selection Process

7

Page 8: INNOVATION ENGINE 2.0: 2020-2021 UPDATEfile... · 3 Score Points 1: Weak response. Little or no evidence 2: Basic Response. Minimal evidence 3: Strong Response. Examples of evidence

Innovation Engine 2.0 Locations (21)

Office of Transformation & Innovation

8

Page 9: INNOVATION ENGINE 2.0: 2020-2021 UPDATEfile... · 3 Score Points 1: Weak response. Little or no evidence 2: Basic Response. Minimal evidence 3: Strong Response. Examples of evidence

PAGE

Office of Transformation and InnovationELEMENTARY IE 2.0 (15)

9

Adelle Turner ES Brashear ES Carpenter ES DeGolyer ES

Launch STEAM

Explore Leadership

Proof of Concept /Explore Leadership &

Entrepreneurship

Launch STEAM - Design

Thinking

Dorsey ES Dunbar ES Eddie Bernice Johnson ES

Foster ES

Explore Leadership

ExploreSTEM

Explore STEM

ExplorePersonalized Learning

Page 10: INNOVATION ENGINE 2.0: 2020-2021 UPDATEfile... · 3 Score Points 1: Weak response. Little or no evidence 2: Basic Response. Minimal evidence 3: Strong Response. Examples of evidence

PAGE

Office of Transformation and InnovationELEMENTARY IE 2.0 (15)

10

Guzick ES Harrell Budd ES Herbert Marcus ES

H. I. Holland ES

ExploreInternational Baccalaureate

LaunchPerforming Arts

Scale/Explore Leadership

Explore New Tech Model

Pershing ES Rhoads / Thompson ES Soto ES

Explore STEAM Career & College

Exploratory

ExploreSTEM

Explore Leadership

Page 11: INNOVATION ENGINE 2.0: 2020-2021 UPDATEfile... · 3 Score Points 1: Weak response. Little or no evidence 2: Basic Response. Minimal evidence 3: Strong Response. Examples of evidence

PAGE

Office of Transformation and InnovationSECONDARY IE 2.0 (6)

11

Boude Story MS Gaston MS Hector P. Garcia MS

ExploreSTEAM

Explore Inquiry Based Learning

Explore IB

Kennedy Curry MS O. W. Holmes MS Roosevelt HS

ExploreVisual / Performing Arts

ExploreSTEAM

Scale/Explore STEAM

Page 12: INNOVATION ENGINE 2.0: 2020-2021 UPDATEfile... · 3 Score Points 1: Weak response. Little or no evidence 2: Basic Response. Minimal evidence 3: Strong Response. Examples of evidence

Innovation Engine 2.0 WinnersApplicant Campus Proposed Model Feeder Pattern Trustee

HIGH SCHOOL Roosevelt HS STEAM Roosevelt Johnson

MIDDLE SCHOOLS

Boude Story MS STEAM South Oak Cliff ForemanGaston MS Communications and Culture - Inquiry Based Learning Bryan Adams Micciche

Hector P Garcia MS International Baccalaureate - Middle Years Programme Adamson MackeyKennedy Curry MS Visual and Performing Arts Wilmer Hutchins JohnsonO W Holmes MS STEAM Roosevelt Johnson

ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS

Herbert Marcus ES Leadership W T White FloresPershing ES STEAM College and Career Exploration Hillcrest FloresDeGolyer ES STEAM - Design Thinking W T White Flores

Adelle Turner ES STEAM - Project Based Learning Carter ForemanEddie Bernice Johnson ES STEM Wilmer Hutchins Johnson

Carpenter ES Leadership and Entrepreneurship Kimball ForemanRhoads/Thompson ES STEM Lincoln Henry

Brashear ES Leadership Kimball ForemanH I Holland ES New Tech South Oak Cliff Johnson

Foster ES Personalized Learning Jefferson CarreonHarrell Budd ES Theater Arts Roosevelt Johnson

Dunbar ES STEM Madison HenrySoto ES Leadership Molina Mackey

Dorsey ES Leadership Spruce GarciaGuzick ES International Baccalaureate Skyline Henry 12

Page 13: INNOVATION ENGINE 2.0: 2020-2021 UPDATEfile... · 3 Score Points 1: Weak response. Little or no evidence 2: Basic Response. Minimal evidence 3: Strong Response. Examples of evidence

THANK YOUQuestions?