2
1 Initiation and escalation of collective violence: a comparative observational study of protest and football events Otto M.J. Adang Stavern, May 10 – 12, 2009 Systematic and structured observations 1986 – 1989 in the Netherlands and during Euro ‘88 (Germany) Over 700 observation hours (78 football matches and 139 protest events) Focusing on intergroup interactions Quantitative analysis Research questions What happens: who uses violence, how many, what type of violence, against whom, under what circumstances, what response? What factors influence the initiation and escalation of violence? Main messages Systematic observations of collective violence: it can be done The importance of interaction Distinguishing between initiation and escalation of collective violence The link between theory and practice: Implications examples Maximum number of violent individuals per bout 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 1 to 4 5 to 9 10 to 19 20 to 49 50 or over Number of individuals Percentage of violent bouts Protest (N=138) Football (N =262) Triggers for violent initiatives 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 agonistic police measures competition annoyance not seen no trigger match events Percentage of initiatives Protesters (N=138) Fans (N=290)

Initiation And Escalation Of Collective Violence 2009

  • Upload
    oadang

  • View
    292

  • Download
    3

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Initiation And Escalation Of Collective Violence 2009

1

Initiation and escalation of collective violence:

a comparative observational study of protest and football events

Otto M.J. Adang

Stavern, May 10 – 12, 2009

Systematic and structured observations

• 1986 – 1989 in the Netherlands and during Euro ‘88 (Germany)

• Over 700 observation hours (78 football matches and 139 protest events)

• Focusing on intergroup interactions

• Quantitative analysis

Research questions

• What happens: who uses violence, how many, what type of violence, against whom, under what circumstances, what response?

• What factors influence the initiation and escalation of violence?

Main messages

• Systematic observations of collective violence: it can be done

• The importance of interaction

• Distinguishing between initiation and escalation of collective violence

• The link between theory and practice:– Implications

– examples

Maximum number of violent individuals per bout

01020304050607080

1 to 4 5 to 9 10 to 19 20 to 49 50 or over

Number of individuals

Pe

rce

nta

ge

of

vio

len

t b

ou

ts Protest (N=138)

Football (N =262)

Triggers for violent initiatives

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

agon

istic

polic

e mea

sure

s

compe

tition

anno

yanc

e

not s

een

no tr

igger

match

even

ts

Pe

rce

nta

ge

of

init

iati

ves

Protesters (N=138)

Fans (N=290)

Page 2: Initiation And Escalation Of Collective Violence 2009

2

Main conclusions

• initiation of violence:– “frictions”

– “young male syndrome”

• escalation of violence:– opportunity/ perception of risk

– ingroup/ outgroup mechanisms

• normal social mechanisms are operating, but influence of alcohol and drugs

Public order management

• need to observe (possible frictions, early signals)

• need to communicate (avoid frictions)• need to build rapport/ relationship (avoid

frictions, increase perception of risk, early signals)

• need to differentiate (avoid us vs them)• need for focused, timely interventions

Practical applications

• Policing protest and unrest in Amsterdam: “peace units” since 1997

• Policing Euro 2000: friendly and firm low profile approach

• Policing football in Arnhem: “From a lot of blue to clever blue” (2003)

• Crowd management of festivities in Nijmegen (2004)

• Policing Euro 2004, WC 2006, Euro 2008

• Police peer reviews (2006)

Incidents (observer data)

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

NL/ B 2000 Portugal 2004 NRW 2006

% o

f sa

mp

les

2000: Adang & Cuvelier (2001); 2004 Stott & Adang (2004); 2006: Schreiber & Adang (2007)