INGAS INtegrated GAS Powertrain INGAS - 2° review meeting c/o EUCAR (Brussels) – 8 April 2011 INGAS project – Year 2 Review Meeting

INGAS INtegrated GAS PowertrainINGAS INtegrated GAS Powertrain

INGAS - 2° review meeting c/o EUCAR (Brussels) – 8 April 2011

INGAS project – Year 2 Review Meeting


INGAS - 2° review meeting c/o EUCAR (Brussels) – 8 April 2011 2

Review meeting Period 2 – Brussels, 8 April 2011

Time Item Name (Company)

09:00 Answers to general comments / questions

General status of the project

Coordinator Massimo Ferrera (CRF)

PM Stefania Zandiri (CRF)

10:00 SPA1: answers to reviewers comments/questions Andrea Gerini (CRF)

10:45 SPA2: answers to reviewers comments/questions Alois Fuerhapter (AVL), Harry Schüle (CONTI)

11:30 SPA3: answers to reviewers comments/questions Christoph Bollig (FEV), Bertold Hüchtebrock (FEV), Kenth Johansson (SAPT), Martin Müther (RWTH)

12:30 Lunch

13:00 SPB0: answers to reviewers comments/questions Manfred Hoppe (EON), Michal Takats (CVUT)

Micheline Montero (GDF SUEZ)

13:45 SPB1: answers to reviewers comments/questions David Storer (CRF), Volker Strubel (Xperion)

15:00 SPB2: answers to reviewers comments/questions Michel Weibel (DAI), Matthias Rink (USTUTT), Alois Fuerhapter (AVL)

16:30 End of reviewers meeting

17:30 Feedback of the reviewers & PO to the Core Group




Reply to Technical Review Report for Period 2 issued by Reviewers:

1)Written responses

2)Revised 24 months Periodic Report

3)New version of rejected deliverables

4)Release of some delayed deliverables

Answers

Deliverables Period 2




Common methodology to compare the 3 engine technology approaches

























This methodology has been approved by PO and reviewers on October 2010

INGAS Targets




Competitiveness vs benchmark

A comparison with a certain vehicle available today in the market is feasible only if vehicle parameters are well known and applied at the same time to all technologies considered inside INGAS project. Moreover current NG engines available into the market show a gap compared to gasoline ones that can be overcome only thanks to technologies developed in INGAS project.




Competitiveness vs benchmark




Emission targets

As written in table 3 of original and last amended versions of INGAS DoW, all demonstrators of INGAS Project have to comply with emission limits halved respect to Euro 6




Cost assessment of different technologies

INGAS Consortium agrees that the control of costs of NG powered vehicles is a critical issue and we have scheduled in the final assessment / comparison of the 3 engine technology platforms to carry out a cost evaluation of innovative developed technologies, but before to manage this issue it’s mandatory to freeze the technologies to apply on final demonstrators.

Therefore the Consortium will provide a cost evaluation according to the list of technologies developed in INGAS project and mentioned above by Reviewers. This activity SP by SP will be carried only in the 3rd year of the project after the completion of definition of integrated technologies to apply on final demonstrators.




Choice of monofuel approach

The main scope of INGAS project is to develop technologies to apply on engines running only on NG and therefore the focus it to optimize and to maximize the exploitation of NG features to reduce fuel consumption and CO2 and to increase the performances.This approach is based on the hypothesis of a short term development of refuelling station network suitable for CNG monofuel vehicles. If this event won’t occur due to lack of adequate infrastructure available in the near future, there’s no chance that INGAS project can change this status because out of its scope according to contractual documents (i.e. DoW).





Reviewed INGAS GANTT (1/2)

17

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42

WP

SP

A3

WP

WP

WP

WP

SP

A2

WP

WP

WP

SP

A1

WP

WP

WP

WP

WP

A3.4 Vehicle Testing and Potential Evaluation

A3.1 Concept phase and design specifications

A3.2 Components, Engine Design and Procurement

A3.3 Component, Engine and Powertrain Testing

A2.4 Combustion System Development

A2.5 Transient Engine Testing

A2.6 Vehicle Validator

A1.5 Global assessment on the validator vehicle

A2.1 Engine Layout

WP

WP

A2.2 Injection System Development

A2.3 Hardware Procurement

A1.1 Base engine development

A1.4 Aftertreatment system development

A1.2 Engine control system development and calibration

A1.3 Combustion process investigations

Month

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4

MA1.1

MA1.2

MA1.3

MA2.1

MA2.2

MA2.3

MA3.1,.2,.3

MA2.2



Reviewed INGAS GANTT (2/2)

18

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42

Year 4

Month

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3

SP

B0

WP B0.1 Determination of gas composition range, WTT calculations

WP B0.2 Numerical Simulations on the influence of gas quality on engine operation

WP B0.3 Supply of limit gases

WP B0.4 Engine tests on gas quality impacts

WP B0.5 Evaluation of gas quality identification methods for advanced CNG engines.

WP B0.6 Final assessment & WTW analysis

SP

B1

WP B1.1 CNG Storage System Requirements

WP B1.2 Development & validation of light weight, low cost composite vessels

WP B1.3 Advanced storage system components

WP B1.4 Storage Module Concepts

WP B1.5 Advanced CNG Vehicle Concepts

WP B2.4 Engine Testing/EAT System Management

SP

B2

WP B2.1 Requirements/boundary conditions

WP

B2.3 Exhaust heating/Catalyst Concepts

B2.2 Advanced Catalyst Development

WP

WP B2.5 EAT system integration / optimisation

MB0.1

MB0.2

MB1.1

MB1.2

MB1.4

MB2.1

MB2.2

MB2.3

MB1.3




SPA2 - Answers to Reviewer Comments

SP A2 Presentation

CONTI Presentation




SPB0 - Answers to Reviewer Comments

SP B0 Presentation

Documents

INGAS INtegrated GAS Powertrain INGAS - 2° review meeting c/o EUCAR (Brussels) – 8 April 2011 INGAS project – Year 2 Review Meeting