Infrastructure Inventory Review

Master Planning Task Force19 October 2009Randy Ortgiesen

Agenda

• Real Property Inventory• Building Mission Matrix• Space Management Policies• Sustainability/LEED• Active projects• Next Steps

19 October 2009 2

Infrastructure Inventory • 6800 acres• 355 buildings

2.3 million square feet• 85 trailers

87 thousand square feet• Infrastructure

• Electric system – power received at 345kV from utility grid at 2 primary substations, 241 secondary substations, 115 miles of cable (80 miles underground)

• Industrial cooling water – 27 miles of piping• Domestic water system – 19 miles of distribution piping • Sanitary system – 14 miles of sewer collection piping• Pond water system – 16 ponds with return and supply channels• Natural gas system – 18 miles of underground piping• Roads & Lots – 36 miles and 122 acres

19 October 2009 3

Building Inventory

19 October 2009 4

Landlord # of Bldgs GSF Total #Occupants Def Maint RPV Total FCI AvgBuildings 355 2,296,466 2366 5,469,463$ 539,857,092$ 2%

AD 126 627,791 293 1,870,037$ 118,180,819$ 3%BS 95 277,306 586 165,410$ 56,485,145$ 1%CD 2 97,579 155 682,773$ 46,447,505$ 1%ES 5 25,100 11 17,832$ 4,461,474$ 1%ES/BS 1 5,835 0 1,099$ 849,579$ 0%FE 28 546,046 911 700,872$ 149,181,268$ 1%FE/BS 1 17,424 10 5,493$ 3,490,617$ 0%FE/ES 1 15,649 22 5,493$ 3,939,100$ 0%PD 57 399,075 150 1,938,047$ 90,387,488$ 3%TD 27 219,541 211 64,825$ 51,910,824$ 0%WR 11 37,016 6 12,089$ 7,610,611$ 1%AD/CD/PD 1 28,104 11 5,493$ 6,912,662$ 0%

Grand Total 355 2,296,466 2366 5,469,463$ 539,857,092$ 2%

Trailer Inventory

19 October 2009 5

Landlord # of Trailers GSF Total #Occupants RPV Total FCI AvgAD 41 20,443 50 1,432,983$ 0%BS 3 884 5 64,677$ 0%FE 3 1,720 0 83,394$ 0%PD 30 53,331 621 3,901,923$ 0%TD 8 10,557 21 734,620$ 0%Grand Total 85 86,935 697 6,217,597$ 0%

Tunnel Area

19 October 2009 6

FY09 Deferred Maintenance

• Buildings =$5.5M/$540M = 1.84% Facility Condition Index• Utilities = $26.5M/$205M = 13% Facility Condition Index

• Electrical = $8M• ICW = $9.3M• Roads & Lots = $2.8M• DWS = $2M• Sanitary = $1.9M

19 October 2009 7

Replacement Plant Value

• Replacement Plant Value (RPV) = $1.6 billion• 355 Buildings at 2.3 million gsf = $540 million• Other Structures and Facilities • Utilities = $205 million• Accelerator and Tunnels = $816 million• OSF 3000 – conventional vs. programmaticAsset RPV ($M) Conv RPV ($M) Conv %

Accelerator Tunnels (MI, Main Ring, Fixed Target, Booster, Antiproton)

764 28 3.7

NuMI Beamline 26 0 0

NuMI Tunnel 59 5 8.2

19 October 2009 8

Building GSF, by Landlord

19 October 2009 9

Number of Buildings, by Landlord

19 October 2009 10

Buildings & Trailers, Size

19 October 2009 11

Trailer GSF, by Landlord

19 October 2009 12

Number of Trailers, by Landlord

19 October 2009 13

T002 PPD

19 October 2009 14

T003 PPD

19 October 2009 15

T035 TD

19 October 2009 16

T049 AD

19 October 2009 17

T051 AD

19 October 2009 18

T113 AD

19 October 2009 19

T173 PD

19 October 2009 20

Facility Mission Matrix

• FIMS number• Facility name• Landlord• Building manager• Usage code• Operational status• Gross square feet

19 October 2009 21

• Net square feet• Floors• Available square feet• Deferred Maintenance• Mission Dependency• Restrictions• Workspaces

Facility Mission Matrix

• Identifies every building, trailer and utility system against existing and future missions (10-year outlook):– % used by mission– Function– Number of workstations – Number of occupants

• Good tool, but only as good as the input• FNAL source data for DOE space verification19 October 2009 22

Future Program Timeline

23

FY2010 TYSP Horizon

FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

Auger Observatories

CDMS Cryogenic Dark Matter Search Operation

Main Injector Fixed Target (E906 etc.)

Fermi Center for Particle Astrophysics

JDEM Joint Dark Energy Mission Launch

Mu2E: Muon to Electron Conversion

DES: Dark Energy Survey

Theoretical Physics

Booster Neutrino Beam w/ MiniBooNE etc.

NuMI Operation with MINOS, NOvA, and Minerva, etc.

NOvA Off Access Detector

New Long Baseline Neutrino Beam

LHC: Large Hadron Collider at CERN

Fermi LHC Physics Center

US CMS, ATLAS

Computing for Science and Administration

Project X

Tevatron Collider Tevatron Standby Tevatron Collider Decommissioning

Tevatron Stretcher

Tevatron Fixed Target

LINAC

Main InjectorTest Beams R&D/Ops

Recycler Ring

Accumulator Ring

Muon R&D, etc. - Muon test area, MuCool, MICE, Muon(g-2)

Neutrino Factory R&D

Advanced Accelerator R&D

Superconducting RF R&D

High Field Magnet R&D

Detector R&D

ILC: International Linear Collider

Visitor Center

Scientific Administration Bldg

Man

agem

ent,

S

uppo

rt F

acili

ties,

In

fras

truc

ture

Com

puta

tiona

l S

cien

ceP

artic

le P

hysi

csLa

rge

Sca

le

Fac

ilitie

s

2/28/2009

Acc

eler

ator

S

cien

ce

Facility Mission Matrix

19 October 2009 24

Directors Policy 36

• FNAL facility reuse policy• Assigns buildings to Div/Sec as landlord• Changes are requested through Directorate

Capital Asset Manager• New Muon and Wide Band reuse for CD• CZero Assembly reuse for AD• MOUs and condition assessments are included 19 October 2009 25

DOE Space Utilization Requirements

• DOE Order 430.1B • Annual reporting in FIMS for Asset Utilization• Published by OECM June 28, 2004

“DOE considers space required to support the mission but whose use might be irregular or periodic as justified”

• Fermilab space has been utilization justified– Doesn’t help meet demo requirements or reduce operating costs– Annual review & update with TYSP

2619 October 2009

DOE Space Management Requirements

• Congressional report language• Federal Real Property Council• DOE 430.1B Real Property Asset Management

– Demolish amount of space that will be constructed– Space must be demolished in same fiscal year as BOD– DOE has ability to use space from other sites– Underground space is included– Space must be identified at CD-1– If offset space can’t be identified at Fermilab:

• Validate fixed target areas are needed• Consider end of collider operations

19 October 2009 27

Demolition Scope of Work

• Intent is to eliminate operational costs• Building demolition is straightforward• Underground demolition is not as clear

– Remove all equipment - yes– Scope should prevent future reuse – yes– Increase future liabilities - no– Remove all construction material - ?

• Tunnel demo cost driven by final scope

19 October 2009 28

Funding Responsibilities

• Cost of Demolition must be included in the Total Project Cost– Demolition could possibly be at another site

• Site can fund demo separately• Sites must fund facility shutdowns

19 October 2009 29

Initial List of Candidate Demo Facilities

• Considered space from proton and neutrino lines at 125ksf– Meson line considered operational

• Used for equipment storage at this time• Radiation considerations • Used for utility chases• Unclear scope of demolition for underground

facilities

3019 October 2009

31

FTA Candidates Total: 124.8kgsfAD N01 5,561AD NW2 864AD NW3 604AD NW4 5,595AD NW5 641AD NW6 2,088AD NW7 1,109AD NW8 6,502AD NW9/104 644AD NE8 428PD NE9 5,270PD NEA/NTB 646PD NEB 5,423AD NTC 1,416AD NS8 100PD NM5 419PD NM6 419PD NBM7 419PD NM8 419PD NM9 419PD NMA 419PD NMB 420PD NMC 419PD NMD 419PD NME 419PD NMF 419PD NMG 419PD NMH 419PD NMI 419PD NMJ 419PD NMK 795PD NML 581PD NMM 581PD NMN 581PD NMO 1,403PD NMP 274PD NMQ 274AD PW2 863AD PW3 657AD PW4 862AD PW5 7,762AD PW6 7,034AD PW7 3,569AD PB5 1,629AD PB6 4,102TD PE5 1,595AD PE4/PB4 7,926AD PE3-4Y 1,791AD PE3 12,021AD PC1 5,670AD PC2 2,008AD PC3 2,283AD PE2/PS2 1,208AD Enclosure J @ PE2 1,211AD PS1 access tunnel 1,089AD PC1 Enclosure H south addition 1,749

AD N01 5,561AD NW2 864AD NW3 604AD NW4 5,595AD NW5 641AD NW6 2,088AD NW7 1,109AD NW8 6,502AD NW9/104 644AD NE8 428PD NE9 5,270PD NEA/NTB 646PD NEB 5,423AD NTC 1,416AD NS8 100PD NM5 419PD NM6 419PD NBM7 419PD NM8 419PD NM9 419PD NMA 419PD NMB 420PD NMC 419PD NMD 419PD NME 419PD NMF 419PD NMG 419PD NMH 419PD NMI 419PD NMJ 419PD NMK 795PD NML 581PD NMM 581PD NMN 581PD NMO 1,403PD NMP 274PD NMQ 274AD PW2 863AD PW3 657AD PW4 862AD PW5 7,762AD PW6 7,034AD PW7 3,569AD PB5 1,629AD PB6 4,102TD PE5 1,595AD PE4/PB4 7,926AD PE3-4Y 1,791AD PE3 12,021AD PC1 5,670AD PC2 2,008AD PC3 2,283AD PE2/PS2 1,208AD Enclosure J @ PE2 1,211AD PS1 access tunnel 1,089AD PC1 Enclosure H south addition 1,749AD Enclosure E, SSB to P01 12,192

19 October 2009

Facility Shutdown Scope of Work

• Doesn’t count for space offset but can reduce operating costs

• Many facilities are heated and include specified levels of mechanical and electrical maintenance that may not be needed

• Consolidation of building space achieves cost savings

3219 October 2009

GSA Space Utilization Guidelinesfor Office Buildings

• 230 sf /person• Including workstations & shared space

• Individual and shared offices & cubicles, circulation space, conference rooms

• Not including – Vertical penetrations

• Elevator shafts, stairs, ventilation shafts

– Common areas• Toilet rooms, storage, mechanical & electrical rooms

19 October 2009 33

Wilson Hall Space Utilization

• Wilson Hall assessment posted: • Current Occupancy 758• GSA Guideline Occupancy 907

also excluding the atrium, conference rooms

shared by the lab, art gallery, loading dock, and ground floor shared service areas (medical, credit union, etc)

• Under-utilization 149

19 October 2009 34

Sustainability / LEED

• LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design)

– US Green Building Council standard– Specific & quantifiable measures– Credits toward “LEED Certified Building”– DOE requires new construction & renovation

projects over $5M to be certified Gold• Bodman memo, 29 February 2008, “DOE Federal

Leadership in High Performance and Sustainable Buildings” implementation of EO 13423

19 October 2009 35

Sustainability / LEED

• Our approach:– Projects over $5M

• Designed to obtain LEED Gold certification or• Apply principals to experimental & industrial buildings

not appropriate for LEED certification

– GPP and other appropriate projects• Apply principals of sustainability where appropriate and

cost effective to the maximum extent possible• Implemented & documented by use of LEED checklist

throughout the life of the project

19 October 2009 36

19 October 2009 37

19 October 2009 38

Construct a two-story addition to the existing Industrial Building 3 (IB-3) in the Industrial Building Complex. •5,800 square feet of office space on the second floor •7,700 square feet of low-bay laboratory and fabrication space on the first floor •Facilitates consolidation of material development, processing, and testing, including superconducting materials for magnets and RF cavities currently scattered throughout the site into one central facility

This project alters the existing New Muon Building such that the facility will be capable of producing and testing key linac elements, called SRF cryomodules, as well as other SRF components. •Construct an underground enclosure and support housings for the SRF cryomodules and test beam lines at Fermilab•Technical beamline equipment will occupy the length of the existing New Muon Lab (NML) and the proposed 202 foot enclosure extension•Remove the existing loading dock and relocate it to the east to accommodate the new tunnel enclosure •Related site work and above grade work

19 October 2009

The two combustion turbine-generators in the basement of Wilson Hall are the key components in the emergency power system. The existing system suffers from advanced age, the need for ever-increasing maintenance, and suspect reliability.•Significant structural modifications may be required to accommodate the new gas engine-generator. •The electrical installation will be very straightforward, with only new conduits and cabling required to tie-in the new generators to the existing Automatic Transfer Switch. •Temporary emergency power generation will be required to serve the emergency needs of Wilson Hall until the new unit can be installed, tested and placed into a ready-to-run condition.

The expansion of the MI-8 Service Building consolidates two Accelerator Division (AD) Target Hall Operations Groups into the Target Support Facility. •Unites NuMI Target Hall operations group (spare Horn and Target production) with the AP-0 Target Hall operations group currently housed at Booster Tower West.•Consolidation into the new Target Support Facility will result in added functionality and reduced risk to personnel and equipment as well as an overall increase in productivity and quality assurance. •Allows for cross-training of personnel providing a larger work pool for both Target Halls during crisis situations.

19 October 2009

Feynman Computing Center (FCC) houses the only high availability computing center (HACC) on the Fermilab campus and is now operating at its electrical capacity. Electrical service must be backed up by both a uninterruptible power supply (UPS) system and a standby electrical generator.•This project will increase the electrical capacity and associated support functions for the Feynman Computing Center, in order to support high availability computing operations. •It will also provide and an additional HACC facility on the third floor of the existing FCC building.

19 October 2009

FCC was constructed in the late-1980’s to provide computing support of high-energy physics programs. With the advent of newer technologies and commodity computers at lower cost, the physical infrastructure requirements in terms of floor space, power and cooling has changed. In order to provide reliable, effective cooling to support for the mission driven computing operations within FCC, modern data center cooling equipment is required. •This project will replacement of the original water source and chilled water computer room air conditioning (CRAC) units with appropriate state of the art cooling equipment for the second and third floor computing spaces in the FCC.

Proposed Next Steps• Review inventory (this meeting)

– Quantity & quality• Establish new project assumptions• Project needed space in the next era

– Concurrent accelerators & experiments• Identify planning neighborhoods• Sort required space

– Sociological factors– Functional issues– Assign to planning neighborhoods

19 October 2009 45