Information Visualization

• Information Visualization (Ch. 1), Stuart K. Card, Jock D. Mackinlay, Ben Shneiderman in Readings in Information Visualization: Using Vision to Think

• Use graphics to– communicate– think

Information visualization

• Medium that assemble data objects into pictures that reveal patterns.

Visualization

• The use of computer-supported, interactive, visual representations of data to amplify cognition

• The main goals of this insight are discovery, decision making, and explanation

Visualization

• Do sophisticated algorithms make visualization obsolete?– E.g. The phone example or the stock trade.

• Do we use visualization as a division of labor between what the computer is good at and what we’re good at?

• Eventually, if the goal is clear can’t we program the computer to attain the goal? – Does visualization then become unnecssesary?

• How do you know that temperature is more important than damage location?

• Knowledge crystallization implies visualization is the end product, rather than discovery.

• Is there a maximum amount of data that can be conveyed? A maximum number of variables?

• information workspace” and “visual knowledge tools” levels; however we are lacking at utilizing “infosphere”-type visualizations. My understanding is that the infosphere level refers to visualizations which display aggregate data from the web or corporate networks for example –> essentially the “infosphere” is an alternative way to browse information across sites / information provide

• Instead of a visualization that makes one or two points very obvious (ie. focusing on transforming the data to make in depth analysis easier), is there a way to create a visualization that makes recognizing many different vectors easy, with each one not having very much depth?

sense.us

Voyagers and Voyeurs: Supporting Asynchronous Collaborative Information Visualization

Information Visualization

• Information visualization leverages the human visual system to improve our ability to process large amounts of data.

• Extends cognition or sensemaking to social process

• Hypothesizes that doubly-linked discussion interface would make the visualization a social place

• Goals:– To understand emergent usage patterns ins social

data analysis– To learn how well the various features of the system

supported this analysiss– Extend past work with a comprehensive design for

asynchronous collaboration around interactive data visualizations

• Do people socializing spend more time in deeper analysis and asking questions?

• Is there a difference between socializing and collaborating?

– Collaborate: to work jointly with others or together especially in an intellectual endeavor

– Work: to fashion or create a useful or desired product by expending labor

• If so, which one does this paper address?

• In the job study, is it realistic that they have no purpose? Why do people browse if they don’t have a purpose?

• Are the users doing what they think the researchers expect them to do?

• What would happen in a company if this were sales data and they needed to decide on where to market new products?

• Would people be less or more collaborative?

• If this were campaign workers deciding where to campaign?

Accuracy

• Is there wrong insight?E.g. was the operative definition correct?

• People said they learned something, but did they learn the “truth” or did they learn things that were “false”?

• Is good data visualization unbiased?– Does socializing infoviz bias?

• Does socializing create false gossip or wikipedia?

• What are the next research steps?