Information session on EGNOS for Regional Aviation - ERA Sept2014... · Information session on EGNOS for Regional Aviation OPERATIONS ADVISORY ... • •Agriculture, maritime, road

Carmen Aguilera – Aviation Market Development Officer at GSA

Víctor Álvarez – Service Adoption Engineer at ESSP SAS

Information session on

EGNOS for Regional Aviation

OPERATIONS ADVISORY GROUP

AGENDA

EGNOS for Regional Aviation 30/09/2014, Barcelona

1 Introduction on EGNOS • System and services

• Actors

2 EGNOS for aviation

• Performance Based Navigation

• Why shall you be interested? Benefits and short/mid-term expectations

3 Call for Grants: “Acceleration of EGNOS adoption in the field of civil aviation” • Objectives

• Essential eligibility, selection and award criteria

• Indicative timetable and amount

• How to submit your proposal?

4 Support to your EGNOS adoption • Actions conducted in aviation

• ESSP support services

• EGNOS adoption examples

5 Open discussion

2

AGENDA

EGNOS for Regional Aviation 30/09/2014, Barcelona 3


• Actors











5 Open discussion

EU GNSS programme management

4

European

Commission

Political oversight

Programme management

Council and

European Parliament

European GNSS

Programme Committee

European

Commission

Security accreditation

Market Development

Service provision

Security centre (GSMC)

Applications R&D

IOV Contracts

FOC Contracts

EGNOS Evolution

Upstream

(space)

industry

Execution

European Space Agency

Delegation

European GNSS Agency

Assistance and

delegation

Downstream

(applications)

industry

GSA portfolio of actions

to foster EGNOS adoption in aviation

Regulation evolution to meet user needs - LPV implementation to non instrumental

runways - Evolution of training/approval

requirements - Contribution to standard development

User driven system evolution - Market analysis - User needs/satisfaction monitoring - Requirements definition - Cost Benefit analysis

Technical support - Ad hoc assistance to implementation - Dedicated training - Co-funding - Development of STC for most common

avionics to reduce certification costs, e.g AML for GNS 430W/530W

Research and development (under EC delegation)

- Advanced operations trials - Validation of new concepts - Multiconstellation/multifreq receivers

(coming soon)

5

http://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&docid=pNCxHmXwK9pa5M&tbnid=6yvkVEFEdgI5OM:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/ict/ssai/fp8preparations_en.html&ei=bbRmUvH_BIPZtAbymIGgDw&bvm=bv.55123115,d.Yms&psig=AFQjCNFy3MgZI8ewiH4i8FvDZfwC3oi1Wg&ust=1382548959115288

GSA and aviation stakeholders join

forces to bring EGNOS to users

6

EGNOS Service provider Technical assistance to foster EGNOS adoption

Cooperation agreement to implement European Union GNSS policies as they apply to the field of aviation.

Safety, pilot training, airworthiness criteria

User organisations: business, general aviation, user associations, avionics manufacturers

Market uptake factor for EGNOS adoption

in aviation

EGNOS take up factors

ANSP/Airports Operators

Operational implementation

Plans

Aircraft equipped

and certified

Avionics available

and certified

Flight crew

capability

ETSO C145/C146 Airworthiness approval and

operational criteria AMC 20-28

7

Ongoing LPV implementation projects (I): ACCEPTA project

ACCelerating EGNOS adoPTion in Aviation 2011

2012 2013-2014

Total of 80 RWYs Incl. 5 heliports

Publication year:

• Existing procedures:

• ILS (Belfast Int.) • APV Baro (Brno) • LNAV (Exeter) • VOR/DME/LOC • VFR (Barra)

• Existing services:

• Full ATC (Lisbon) • AFIS (Islay, Tiree) • NO ATC (La Perdiz)

Almería

La Perdiz Lisbon -Portela

Santander Baracaldo

Toulouse

Montpellier Cannes

Les Eplatures

Alternhein

Graz

Linz

Joensuu

Bratislava Kosice

Ostrava Brno

Groningen

Exeter

Kirkwall

Islay

Inverness Wick

Duncee

Belfast

Stornoway

Sumburgh

Tiree

Milan

Talavera

Toledo

Land’s End

St. Mary’s

Barra Benbecula

Campbeltown

8

Ongoing LPV implementation projects (II): Technical support to 1st LPV implementation in 7 countries

Croatia

Ireland

Romania

Sweden

Norway

Belgium

Denmark

Country Airport Status

Belgium Antwerp Obstacle survey

Croatia Dubrovnik Design ongoing

Denmark Aarhus Design completed

Denmark Karup Design completed

Ireland Dublin Design completed

Norway Røst Published in AIP, under validation

Romania Cluj Napoca Design completed

Sweden Gothenburg In AIP on 18th Sep

Sweden Storumans Design completed

Sweden Trollhättan Design started

Sweden Ljungbyhed Design started

Snow ball effect already happening!:

- Norway regulation to implement APV to all instrumental runways by 2016.

- Denmark: regional airports association demand more LPV. CAA awaiting for pilot results to enlarge the offer to others

- Sweden: 8 operators have already requested GSA support in view of the LPV roll out 9

Publication planned in early 2015

Enabling a positive business case (I):

19 Operators upgrading the fleet to LPV

10

8x Fokker 50

2x BN2B Islander

CityJet (VLM)

Hebridean Air

Loganair

2x Twin Otter

2x BN2B Trislander

Aurigny

Bell 412

Inaer

NetJets

Hawker 750

King Air 300

Air Charters Europe

NLR

Fairchild Metro II

King Air 1900D

5x ATR 72-600

15x CRJ 1000

Air Nostrum

Cessna Citation II

Aviation South West

Piper P28A Beechcraft 76

Royal Star-Aero

Piper PA-34 Seneca II

REGIONAL BUSINESS GENERAL/TRAINING

Skybus

Twin-Otter

Specsavers

2x Beech 350 Wideroe

REGA

Eurocopter EC135

Dutch & MartinAir Flight

Academies

4x Diamond DA42

DHC 8-100

Ljungbyheds Flygklubb Lund University School

of Aviation

Cirrus SR20 DA40-180

Chalair

2 x Beechcraft1900

Enabling a positive business case (II):

Operators and avionics ready for LPV

Business aviation operators are pushing for EGNOS implementation:

• Aircraft already equipped and ready to fly LPV • Agreement with GSA in place to accelerate LPV implementation

Most OEMs for business aviation and high end helicopters provide baseline configuration with

SBAS/EGNOS equipage for their new models Cessna-Citation, Daher Socata, Dassault, Eclipse, Embraer, Piaggio, Gulfstream, Hawker Beechraft, Syberjets, Evektor, Vulcanair (multipurpose) and Augusta Westland, Sikorsky, MD and Eurocopter (helicopters)

Commercial aviation - Airbus

• The A350 will have SBAS on board • The A400M is LPV capable as well

STC/Service Bulletin retrofit solutions available for many models

11

• Core constellations

− GPS (US) from 1993

− GLONASS (Russia) from 2011

− Galileo (Europe) from 2020

− Beidou (China) from 2020

• Augmentation systems (for GPS L1)

− SBAS (Wide Area)

WAAS from 2003

EGNOS from 2011

MSAS from 2007

GAGAN from 2014

SDCM 2014?

− GBAS (Ground Based)

− ABAS (Airborne Based-RAIM)

US DoD

European Commission


The EGNOS system (i)

Introduction on EGNOS

12

13

• EGNOS is the European SBAS augmenting GPS L1 signal over the ECAC area

EGNOS is interoperable with other SBAS systems



13

The EGNOS system (ii)

EGNOS for Regional Aviation

EWAN EGNOS Wide Area Network

39 RIMS +

2 under

deployment

GPS

2 x Support

Facilities

4 x MCC

Mission

Control

Centers

6 x NLES

Navigation

Land Earth

Stations

x3 EGNOS

satellites

30/09/2014, Barcelona


14

The EGNOS system (iii)

• This service provides, via geostationary satellites:

− Integrity information:

flags GPS SV as “not usable” within 6s from GPS failure (so called TTA)

Flags IGPS as “not usable” if ionospheric conditions are not smooth enough (ie: solar and

geomagnetic storms …)

− GPS orbit and ionospheric corrections information improves accuracy to 1-2m



15

The EGNOS system (iv)

EGNOS Open Service (OS)

• Service Declaration: 1st October 2009 • http://www.essp-sas.eu/service_definition_documents

• Agriculture, maritime, road, rail, LBS ...

EGNOS Safety-of-Life (SoL) Service

• Service Declaration: 2nd March 2011 • http://www.essp-sas.eu/service_definition_documents

• All phases of flight in aviation

• SoL applications in any domain

EGNOS Data Access Service (EDAS)

• EDAS Service provided by ESSP since 2010

• Service Declaration: 26th July 2012 • http://www.essp-sas.eu/service_definition_documents

• Commercial/professional multimodal applications

2009

2010

2011

EGNOS Services

Aviation

Road

Location Based Services

Maritime

Rail

Professional Applications

Markets

30/09/2014, Barcelona EGNOS for Regional Aviation

The EGNOS services (i)


16

ATS/AIS

services

Industry Consortium

Design & Development Agent


European Commission &

GSA (European GNSS Agency) (System owner & Programme manager)

Contract

EGNOS Service

Provider

The EGNOS Service Provision Scenario

Certification/oversight

Service

National Air

Traffic Service

Provider


EGNOS for Regional Aviation 17

MISSION of the ESSP

• To provide the (1) EGNOS Open Service and (2) Safety of Life Service compliant

with ICAO Standard And Recommended Practices throughout the ECAC region and the

(3) EGNOS Data Access Service (EDAS)

CERTIFICATION

• Certified as Air Navigation Services Provider according to the SES (Single European

Sky) regulations

• The (SES) Certification process was managed by the French National Supervisory

Authority (NSA), with seven other NSA associated to the process on July 2010.

The EGNOS Safety-of-Life Service

was declared available as of the 2nd of March 2011


The European Satellite Services Provider (i)


18

ESSP: ORGANISATION AND LOCATION

• Private French Company

• ~ 100 employees

− SOU: Toulouse (65%)

− SPU: Madrid (35%)

• Shareholders

− 7 major ANSPs

(Aena, DFS, DSNA, ENAV,

NATS, NAVP and Skyguide)


The European Satellite Services Provider (ii)


19

AGENDA



• Actors











5 Open discussion

21

Conventional navigation Area Navigation (RNAV PBN)

• Aircrafts navigate based on direct signals from

ground-based radio NAVAIDs

• Navigation relies on aircraft crossing radio beacons

and tracking to and from them directly

• Routes are dependent on the location of the

navigation beacons, resulting in longer routes

• Aircrafts compute their latitude-longitude position

• Navigation relies on aircraft crossing fixes defined by

name, latitude and longitude

• Routes are no or less dependent on the location of

NAVAIDs, resulting in much more flexible route

designs

Images from ICAO

Performance Based Navigation (i)

EGNOS for aviation


Performance Based Navigation (ii)

ICAO NAVIGATION SPECIFICATIONS

Designation RNAV 5 RNAV 2 RNAV 1

Designation RNAV 10

For Oceanic and Remote Continental navigation

applications For En Route & Terminal navigation applications

RNP SPECIFICATIONS RNAV SPECIFICATIONS

Designation

RNP with additional requirements to be

determined (e.g. 3D, 4D etc)

Designation

B-RNP 1

RNP AR APCH for various phases of

flight

RNP 2

A-RNP RNP 0.3

RNP APCH

Designation RNP 4

For Oceanic & Remote Continental navigation

applications


EGNOS for aviation

22

EGNOS BASED APPROACHES WITHIN PBN CONCEPT

RNP APCH

WITHOUT VERTICAL GUIDANCE

LNAV LP

WITH VERTICAL GUIDANCE

LNAV/VNAV LPV

RNP AR APCH

WITH VERTICAL GUIDANCE

LNAV/VNAV

GPS NPA

Expected to be

flown with CDFA

NPA SBAS supported

Localiser Performance

APV Baro

(can also be

supported by SBAS)

APV SBAS supported

Localiser Performance

with Vertical Guidance

Authorisation

required, RF

Chart: RNAV (GNSS) Chart: RNAV (RNP)


EGNOS for aviation

23

Performance Based Navigation (iii)


EGNOS for aviation

2D Nov 2014

3D

Nov 2014

EGNOS for Regional Aviation 24

Performance Based Navigation (iv)


EGNOS for aviation

25

Performance Based Navigation (v)

30/09/2014, Barcelona EGNOS for Regional Aviation 26

EGNOS for aviation

Why shall you be INTERESTED in EGNOS?

• Reduction in DDC (Delays, Diversions & Cancelations) of 48%1

− Increased accessibility to airports not equipped with ILS or during ILS outages

− Reduction in the decision height (DH)

− Improvement in service regularity

− No temperature restriction (compared to APV Baro)

− No RAIM check (compared to GPS NPA)

• Reduced costs and environmental impact

− Reduced fuel burn (saving money and decreasing emissions)

− Reduced noise footprints

− Use of more flexible route and procedure designs

− CDFA (avoiding dive-and-drive)

− ANSP and Airport savings in infrastructure (installation and calibration of navaids)

reduced airport fees:

− ILS: installation 650k, calibration 32k/year

− VOR: installation 677k, calibration 33k/year

− NDB: installation 84k, calibration 4k/year

− LPV: installation 30k, review 1k every 4 years

(1) Airlines/ANSP/Eurocontrol estimate

Source: “EGNOS Cost Benefit Analysis in Aviation”

Courtesy: L.E.K / GSA


EGNOS LPV benefits (i)

EGNOS for aviation

27

• Reduction in CFIT (Controlled Flight Into Terrain) of 74%1

− More accurate lateral and vertical guidance

− Enhanced situational awareness

− Increased automation (reduced cockpit workload)

− Stabilized approaches (reducing runway excursions)

• Enable advanced arrival and departure procedures

− Curved approach procedures

− Separation minima reduction

− IAP in non-instrumental aerodromes

EGNOS provides operational, environmental, safety

and economical benefits

(1) Compared to NPA approaches

Airlines/ANSP/Eurocontrol estimate

Source: “EGNOS Cost Benefit Analysis in Aviation”

Courtesy: L.E.K / GSA


EGNOS for aviation

28

EGNOS LPV benefits (ii)

LPV APPROACHES

• EGNOS provides access to:

− Small/medium aerodromes in poor

weather conditions and in challenging

terrain environments

− Non-ILS equipped aerodromes

(primary)

− Aerodromes during ILS outages

(backup)


Buochs (Switzerland)

Barra (Scotland)

San Sebastián (Spain)

Alderney (Guernsey)

EGNOS for aviation

29

EGNOS LPV benefits (iii)

Some feedback from pilots:

“We find the LPV much more stable than even the ILS approach. In addition, with EGNOS our

workload is reduced” Aurigny Air Services

“The overall memory was just how stable the system is. The ILS glide path fluctuated slightly on

box 2 but the LPV remained rock steady (my co-pilot thought the autopilot was still engaged!). I

now appreciate why Thomson – the regional airline operating at Exeter - have almost always flown

the LNAV rather than the ILS” Aviation Southwest

“I felt I was flying an ILS” Inaer


EGNOS for aviation

EGNOS LPV benefits (iv)

Flying manually in LPV final (Source: HEDGE project )

“Are the CDI/VDI needles working? This GPS approach

is so-accurate!” TAF Helicopters

Some feedback from pilots:

“…inbound track and glide path are totally reliable and steady,…, there are no sudden changes or

movements of indications……I would say, better than a current radio based ILS operation.

Simply 100% accurate, lineal and reliable” Gestair Pilot

“…Excellent flyability. Very smooth to follow, very precise in the course and in the glide

path...Superb guidance information presented to the pilot. Can be followed up 20 ft over the

runway maintaining a great precision. Easier than expected and amazing to follow the path on

the runway. We are delighted with this type of approaches” Gestair Co-Pilot


EGNOS for aviation

EGNOS LPV benefits (v)

• 22 EGNOS WORKING AGREEMENTS SIGNED

AFTER THE SoL SERVICE DECLARATION

• 204 EGNOS-BASED PROCEDURES OVER

EUROPE

- 128 LPV approaches

- 76 APV-BARO approaches authorized to be

flown with EGNOS in: Germany, France, Czech Rep and soon in the UK


Short/mid-term expectations (i) – Implementation status

32

EGNOS for aviation


Country Airports LPV Procedures

APV baro

Procedures (EGNOS

enabled)

France 55 74 1

Spain 1 2 0

Switzerland 6 6 0

Guernsey 1 2 0

Germany 40 15 71

Italy 5 11 0

Finland 1 2 0

Austria 2 2 0

Czech Republic 3 4 4

Norway 1 2 0

Poland 1 2 0

United Kingdom 2 4 0

Sweden 1 2 0

Total 119 128 76

33

EGNOS for aviation

Short/mid-term expectations (ii) – Implementation status


EGNOS for aviation

Short/mid-term expectations (iii) – Implementation status

• Antwerp Airport

• Bern Airport

• Blue Danube Airport Linz

• Budapest Airport

• Cambridge Intl Airport

• Cardiff Airport

• Groningen Airport Eelde

• Innsbruck Airport

• Isle of Man Airport

• Jersey Airport

• London City Airport

• London Oxford Airport

• London Southend Airport

• Nantes Atlantique

• Pula Airport

• Rijeka Airport

• Rotterdam The Hague

Airport

• Salzburg Airport

• Shannon Airport

• Vagar Airport


As of 18th Sept 2014

128 LPV serving 86 airports

76 runways served by EGNOS enabled APV Baro

Plans by 2016

>320 LPV planned by 2016

Check link: http://egnos-user-support.essp-sas.eu/egnos_ops/lpv_map/map.php

35

EGNOS for aviation

Short/mid-term expectations (iv)

http://egnos-user-support.essp-sas.eu/egnos_ops/lpv_map/map.php








• Massive boost in southern Norway - >20 new airports by Q1 2015

• Growing interest detected in Sweden - Following CAA’s policy on APV implementation to all

instrument RWY ends by 2016

• Numerous LPV publications expected in UK - As a result of FP7 ACCEPTA project and other enablers

like CAP 1122 policy

EGNOS for aviation

Short/mid-term expectations (v)


• EGNOS newcomers publishing their first LPVs

by end-2014 or 2015: - Ireland: Dublin

- Netherlands: Teugen, Groningen

- Denmark: Aarhus, Karup

- Portugal: Lisbon

- Croatia: Dubrovnik

- Bulgaria: Burgas

- Romania: Cluj Napoca

- Belgium: Antwerp

- Slovak Republic: Bratislava, Kosice

EGNOS for aviation

Short/mid-term expectations (vi)



YEAR 2015

• SERVICE LEVEL: LPV-200 (i.e. SBAS CAT-I) capability will be provided based on new

ESR v 2.4.1M

• SERVICE AREA: providing LPV200 service o Target deployment: Q2 2015

The EGNOS system

Short/mid-term expectations (vii)

38

AGENDA



• Actors











5 Open discussion

CALL FOR PROPOSALS

ACCELERATION OF EGNOS ADOPTION IN

THE FIELD OF CIVIL AVIATION

Barcelona 30 September 2014

Carmen Aguilera

Market Development Department

European Regional Airlines General Assembly

Scope and Objectives of the call

Scope:

Award a number of grants to foster EGNOS operational implementation

for civil aviation in all market segments (Regional Aviation, Business

Aviation, General Aviation and rotorcraft)

Objectives:

Foster the implementation of EGNOS based operations

Development and/or installation of GPS/EGNOS enabled avionics

Approval of Air Operator Certificate for LPV operations of aircraft

already equipped with SBAS capabilities

Development of enablers to accelerate EGNOS adoption and

preparation for futures capabilities

41

The Call is structured in

7 Areas of activities

42

RNP APCH procedures to LPV minima based on EGNOS:

PinS Procedures to LPV minima based on EGNOS:

Aircraft or rotorcraft forward fit

Aircraft or rotorcraft retro fit

Development of Service Bulletin

Development of Supplemental Type Certificate

Other EGNOS based operations and development of Enablers

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

Areas of activities (I)

Approach Procedures Implementation

Design, development and publication of EGNOS LPV

procedures (at European aiports)

Typical activities: Procedure design Safety Assessment Ground and Flight validation

Focus on helicopter Point in Space approach

operations serving heliports, helipads or oilrigs

RNP APCH procedures to LPV minima

PinS Procedures to LPV minima

43

A

B

Expected output: operational implementation

Areas of activities (II)

Aircraft upgrade

Focus on development of SBAS LPV capability in new aircraft models and/or

entry into operation Certain aircraft manufacturers may include the SBAS LPV capability as an

optional package in some of their models. This area supports development and acquisition of such SBAS LPV options.

Aircraft or rotorcraft forward fit

Focus on in-service aircraft/rotorcraft not certified to perform LPV procedures Two scenarios:

1. Airframes equipped with EGNOS LPV avionics but without a LPV operational approval: funding for operational approval;

2. Airframes not equipped with EGNOS LPV avionics: in addition, costs related to hardware acquisition, hardware installation and certification could be funded.

Aircraft or rotorcraft retro fit

44

C

D

Expected output: LPV operational approval from the relevant Authority.

Areas of activities (III)

Avionics solutions

Aircraft or rotorcraft manufacturers may generate Service Bulletins (SBs) to

include SBAS LPV capabilities in some of their models. These improvements are usually offered to customers as optional items.

This area will fund development of SBs involving SBAS LPV.

Service Bulletin

Supplemental Type Certificates (STCs) are major modifications to an

existing type certified aircraft. STCs are usually developed, designed and owned by non-TC holders (Part-21 EASA approved organisations).

This area funds development of STCs, involving SBAS LPV

Supplemental Type Certificate

45

E

F

Expected output: SB and STC commercially available

Areas of activities (IV)

Enablers and other EGNOS based operations

Any activity that addresses the development of enablers to accelerate EGNOS adoption and its operational use by civil aviation

Possible activities: (not limited list) Development of RNP 0.3 routes where GNSS prediction is replaced by EGNOS Localizer Performance approaches (LP) LPV 200 (SBAS CAT I ) Enablers, such as: flight simulators for training purposes, flight validation

tools…

46

G

Eligibility and EU funding

47

Submitted by legal o natural persons established in an EU Member State or another participating third country (Article 30 of the GNSS Regulation).

No restriction on consortium size

For proposals on approach procedures: At least on entity should be ANSP or aerodromes/heliports/helipads

For proposals on aircraft equipment and approvals: At least one entity should represent airspace users (airlines, flight operators, pilots, aircraft owners, avionics and aircraft manufacturers)

Eligible applications

* Switzerland and Norway are expected to participate in the GNSS programmes.

Maximum budget of this call: 6 M€

Indicative value of a grant: 500.000 € (not a constraint!)

Maximum EU financing rate: Direct costs: 60% funding

Indirect costs: flat rate 7% of the direct costs

EU Funding

Eligible Costs

Eligible direct costs:

Eligible indirect costs:

Costs connected with infrastructure, depreciation of buildings , water/gas/electricity, insurance,…

Eligible Costs

In addition, following costs shall not be considered eligible:

Non-Eligible Costs

Return on capital Doubtful debts Contributions in kind from 3rd parties

Debt and debt service charges Exchange losses Excessive or reckless expenditure

Provisions for losses or debts Bank charges from transfers Deductible VAT

Interest owed Costs of another funded action Participation by staff in Union

institutions

Costs of personnel Costs of natural persons working under a contract with

the partner Subsistence allowances Costs of travel Depreciation costs of equipment or other assets Duties, taxes and charges

Costs of consumables and supplies Costs arising directly from requirements imposed by the

grant agreement Costs relating to a pre-financing guarantee lodged by the

beneficiary of the grant Costs relating external audits Costs of financial support to 3rd parties

48

10/6/2014 49

Relevance and credibility of the proposed approach

Impact in terms of economic and public benefits

Coherence and effectiveness of the work

plan

How relevant is the proposal to

the objectives of the published

theme?

Overall quality of the proposal in

terms of its methodology

Feasibility of the proposal

targeting operational

implementation

Involvement and endorsement of

key stakeholders, such as CAA

Proven experience in EGNOS

based operations implementation

Is the proposal supported by a positive Cost Benefit analysis?

Public and economic benefits thanks to rationalisation of ground infrastructure thanks to LPV implementation

Increased access to small airports thanks to EGNOS and catalyst for more efficient airspace use

Maximisation of the operational use of EGNOS: e.g. Equipment of aircraft flying to LPV destinations and implementation of LPVs at airports within the destination network of operators equipped with LPV capabilities

Appropriateness of the management structures and procedures, including risk and innovation management

Complementarity of the participants within the consortium

Coherence of the work plan in terms of activities’ definition, schedule, effort and cost, including justification of the resources to be committed

Feasibility of the work plan, e.g. availability of regulations and support from authorities

Award criteria

Important Dates

Stages Date and time or indicative period

Publication of the call 4 August 2014

Deadline for submitting applications 31 October 2014 – at 16:00

Prague time

Evaluation period November 2014

Info to applicants on the outcome of evaluation December 2014

Signature of Grant Agreement December 2014

50

Timing

How to submit a proposal (I)

51

Electronic submission is not allowed for this call

Proposals must be placed inside a sealed envelope

Envelope should be marked : “Call for proposals – not to be opened”

Proposal shall be submitted by letter:

By courier before 31/10/2014

Delivered by hand before 31/10/2014, 16h00 Prague time

CALL FOR PROPOSALS

Number GSA/GRANT/EGNOS/03/2014 Title: Acceleration of EGNOS adoption in the field of civil aviation

GSA –Market Development Department Janovského 438/2

170 000 Prague 7 – Czech Republic

Address

How to submit a proposal (II)

52

Call description: areas, of application, eligibility criteria, guidelines for submission

Budget form

Admin forms: participants, contact details, summary budget

Template for technical proposal: free text + structured forms per area of activity

Template for financial capacity check (only coordinator)

Template for operational capacity (technical competences)

Declaration of honour

Model grant agreements

http://www.gsa.europa.eu/call-proposals-acceleration-egnos-adoption-field-civil-aviation-0

Publication of clarifications and Call corrigendums


















Latest information at GSA website and social networks: check for clarifications!

53

http://www.gsa.europa.eu/call-proposals-acceleration-egnos-adoption-field-civil-aviation-0 https://www.facebook.com/EuropeanGnssAgency

https://twitter.com/EGNOSPortal




















https://www.facebook.com/EuropeanGnssAgency

https://www.facebook.com/EuropeanGnssAgency



Contact details

54

About the Call for proposals: [email protected]

About EGNOS use in aviation: how to plan LPV implementation, feasibility analysis, risk assessment: [email protected]

AGENDA



• Actors








4 Support to your EGNOS adoption • Actions conducted in aviation: ERA example



5 Open discussion

Improving EGNOS usage in aviation means

increasing…

…the number of

published LPV

procedures

…the number of

EGNOS certified

aircrafts

…the number of

EGNOS-approved

airlines

Support to your EGNOS adoption


ESSP elaborated an assessment on the retrofitting capabilities of

ERA’s fleet

The analysis shows that

56% of the fleet is, or will soon be, retrofitable

(395 a/c out of 703)



Actions conducted in aviation: ERA example (i)

Fleet composition




ERA’s fleet

Actions conducted in aviation: ERA example (ii)

STC number Aircraft model Holder Status Comments

10047025 ATR 72-101/-1-2/-201/-212/-212A

ATR 42-200/300/320/400/500 DAC International Available

10041711 CL600-2B19 (CRJ100 and CRJ440) Rockwell Collins Available FAA STC NO.

ST01514WI-D

10045827 ATR-42 Scandinavian Avionics Design GmbH Available

SB option Bombardier CRJ-1000 Bombardier Available

10043626 B737-300/737-400/737-500 Corportation Logic Air Inc. (CMC) Available

10016085 B737-200/300 Arc Avionics Corp. (Universal) Available FAA ST03362AT

10037800

BN2A-8/9/20/21/26/27

BN2B-20/21/26/27

BN2T/2T-4R/4S,

BN2A MARK III/III-1/III-2/III-3

GAMA Engineering Available

- BAE-146/RJ (Dual FMS) DAC International Ongoing

- SAAB 2000 DAC International. Ongoing

- SAAB 340 DAC International (UNS 1LW plus

LPV monitor) Ongoing

Expected October

2014.

- Bombardier Dash 8-400 Canard Aerospace Corporation Available in

USA FAA/ST02780CH

- Fokker-50 Tenencia Ongoing FAA STC ST09441SC

- BAE-146/RJ DAC International Ongoing

- Bombardier Dash 8-100/200/300 DAC International Ongoing




ERA’s fleet

Actions conducted in aviation: ERA example (iii)

ATR 72, 76

CRJ 100, 43

ATR 42, 38

D8-400, 33

F50, 32

Avro RJ, 29

S2000, 29

CRJ 1000, 23

D8-100, 22

B737-300, 17

B737-400, 12

S340, 10

D8-300, 8 B737-500, 7

D8-200, 7 BN-2A, 6 BAe 146, 3

Retrofittable: 395 a/c

BN-2A, 6

BAe 146, 3

E145, 48

BAEe-ATP, 41

E190, 29

CRJ 200, 24 CRJ 900,

20

E170, 19

F70, 19

E195, 16

CRJ700, 13

F100, 13

A320-200, 11

B717, 9

D328, 7

E135, 7 A319, 5

E175, 5

B737-800, 4

STC unavailable: 308 a/c



ESSP elaborated and assessment for the B733, B734 and B735

operators which could benefit from the available STC 10043626

Actions conducted in aviation: B737 example

Airline Country

Number of Boeing units

Comments

Destination airports with LPV

737-

300

737-

400

737-

500 TOTAL

Published

(+APV Baro)

Ongoing

Q1 2015

Planned

<2016

Lufthansa Germany 15 17 32 To be phased out (replaced by Airbus)

TNT Belgium 5 9 14 15 7 7

Airpost France 10 4 14 Retrofit ongoing?

Mistral Italy 4 3 7 1 1 3

Blue Panorama Italy 3 1 1 5 3 2 1

Meridiana Fly Italy 2 2 4 1 2

Air Baltic Latvia 9 5 14 To be replaced by bombardier CS 300 in 2017

Small Planet Lithuania 5 5 1

Norwegian Air

Shuttle Norway 10 10

Only B737-300 route

analysed 7 9 6

Swiftair Spain 6 6 Only B737-300 route

analysed 1 2

Privat Air Switzerlan

d 2 2 Operated by Equatorial Congo airlines

Ukraine Int. Ukraine 6 4 10 20 6 5 3

Atlantic Airlines UK 2 2 Cargo. 4 5

British Airways UK 19 19 24 29 5

Jet2.com UK 31 31 8 4 5

Titan Airways UK 2 2 2 2

TOTAL 112 40 33 185


Analysis of current

situation

Identification of

needs Action

• LPV implementation status and plans

• National PBN implementation plans

• European aircraft fleet capabilities

• EGNOS certified and approved operators

• STCs and SBs: available and under development (Part 21

organisations and manufacturers)

• Regulatory activity (e.g. IAP to non-instrument RWYs, new

PANS-OPS by Nov. 2014)

61



Analysis of current

situation

Identification of

needs Action

• Promotion of EGNOS at specific fora (countries, domains)

• Gathering of STCs and SBs available

• Promotion of new (AML) STCs and SBs

• Preparation of training material

• Elaboration of guidelines for implementation

• Catalogue of services provided by third parties

• Dedicated support to newcomers or special cases

62



Analysis of current

situation

Identification of

needs Action

Awareness

Technical support

– LPV implementation status

• Enhanced map at EGNOS USER SUPPORT web

– Comprehensive guidance material:

• ANSPs and airports

• Regulatory and standardization framework

• ATM activities: procedure design, safety assessment, ATC

procedures…

• CNS activities: EWAs, NOTAMS, validation activities…

• AIS activities: charting, publication…

• Coordination with NSAs and responsibilities

63



Analysis of current

situation

Identification of

needs Action





• Operators

• Regulatory and standardization framework

• Equipment qualification /avionics requirements

• A/C modification, upgrade and certification by EASA

• Training

• Operational Manual update

• Operational approval by CAA

Awareness

Technical support

64



Analysis of current

situation

Identification of

needs Action





• Operators

– Support services catalogue:

• Manufacturers, Part 21s, Part 145s

• Procedure designers

• Flight Validation companies

• Complementary services

Awareness

Technical support

65



Analysis of current

situation

Identification of

needs

Awareness

Technical support

• Performance Assessments, analysing, among

others: • Generic EGNOS SoL service performances

• APV-I Availability

• APV-I Continuity

• APV-I Accuracy.

• Horizontal and Vertical Safety Indexes.

• EGNOS NOTAM proposals issuing.

Action

66



Analysis of current

situation

Identification of

needs Action

Awareness

Technical support


others:

• CBAs for both airports/ANSPs

and operators • For operators: Assessment of equipage and certification

costs, estimation of operation savings (by the procedure

constructions and through induced avoided disruptions)

and CFIT savings.

• At ground level: Assessment of procedure implementation

costs and estimation of benefits due to avoided

disruptions, network accessibility and navaids phasing-

out.

67



Analysis of current

situation

Identification of

needs Action

Awareness

Technical support


others:

• CBAs for both airports/ANSPs

and operators

• Dedicated Workshops for different targeted

audience

• Support to mapping EGNOS in national PBN

implementation plans

• EWA promotion and preparation

• Reg. CE 550/2004 and 1035/2011 to formalize

the working interfaces between ESSP and

ANSPs as an evidence for the NSA

• Technical advice on implementation projects

(lessons learnt, PoCs)

68



LPV approval: recomendations for Operators

1. Establish the certification plan • Establishment of Certifying Authority, e.g. EASA • Agreeing the certification basis, e.g. EASA CS-23 • Agreeing the compliance summary, e.g. EASA

AMC 20-28 • Timeline of deliverables

1 to 2 months Duration

Costs NA (subcontracting)

69



1. Establish the certification plan • Part 21 (DOA) or TC Holder (manufacturer) • Aircraft survey • Design data Package • A/C conversion + ground/flight test • Compliance demonstration • STC design approval

STC/SB not available

2. STC/SB elaboration


Costs 30 to 120 k€

70




1. Establish the certification plan • Part 145 or Manufacturer • A/C conversion • Airworthiness re-certification STC/SB not available


STC/SB available

3. Implement changes


Costs 15 to 120 k€

71




1. Establish the certification plan • Operational design and descriptions (AOM) • Flight and maintenance training • Operational documentation • Request CAA for approval

STC/SB not available


STC/SB available

3. Implement changes

4. Operational approval


Costs 5 to 20 k€

72



EGNOS Adoption examples

AURIGNY AIR SERVICES

• Project with Eurocontrol and NATS in 2010/2011

• Results – First regional airline making use of EGNOS during their approach and landing operations

– Nowadays, conducting more than 70 LPV approaches per week


ESSP support to EGNOS adoption

We find the LPV much more stable

than even the ILS approach!

BEFORE AFTER

73


AVIATION SOUTHWEST & EXETER AIRPORT

• Part of GSA funded ACCEPTA project 2012-2014

• Results – Airport: LPV procedures to be published in August 2014

– ASW:

• Upgrade of BE76 and Piper 28A

• LPV training incorporated onto the IR course

• 10 IR instructors and 3 IR NAA examiners have been trained until June 2014



We may withdraw non-precision approaches

when navaids reach the end of their life now

that LPV is available

The LPV avalanche may start slow but it gains

momentum and is unstoppable. Proper training

is absolutely essential!

74


DSNA, the French ANSP

• Committed to an ambitious roadmap aiming to publish 200 PBN

and EGNOS based approach procedures in the coming years

• 73 LPV procedures published until the date (September 2014)



75

EVENT TITLE 76 26 Oct 2009

Thank you

www.egnos-portal.eu

For further information contact:

Carmen Aguilera

[email protected]

Víctor Álvarez

[email protected]

mailto:[email protected]




AGENDA


1 ESSP role and actions

2 The EGNOS system

• EGNOS services and users: SoL in Aviation

• Implementation status

• Performance and system evolution roadmap

3 EGNOS for aviation and adoption strategy

4 Call for Grants: “Acceleration of EGNOS adoption in the field of civil aviation” • Scope and Objectives



• How to present your proposal?

5 ESSP support to EGNOS adoption: • Actions conducted in aviation



6 Open discussion

78

EQUIPMENT CERTIFIED TO TSO/ETSO C145 OR C146

• Rockwell Collins

- GPS-4000S (ProLine 4™ and ProLine 21 ™)

• Universal Avionics

- UNS-1Ew, -1Lw, -1Fw

- LP/LPV monitor

• Honeywell

- KGS 200 Mercury GNSSU (newest Primus Apex® and Epic®)

• CMC

- CMA 5024 GLSSU

• Thales

- Topstar 200 LPV

Manufacturers strategy on EGNOS

Avionics for commercial aviation


Back-up slides

79

Documents

Information session on EGNOS for Regional Aviation - ERA Sept2014... · Information session on EGNOS for Regional Aviation OPERATIONS ADVISORY ... • •Agriculture, maritime, road