Upload
julien-grollier
View
384
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Citation preview
2. STRUCTURE OF PRESENTATION
3. I. INTRODUCTION
4. II. TRADE POLICY MAKING PROCESS IN ZAMBIA: KEY CONSULTATIVE MECHANISMS Consultative Mechanism Mandate Composition National Working Group on Trade (NWGT) Agriculture Consultative Forum (ACF)Trade Expansion Working Group Steering Committee of Secretaries All trade issues Agriculture issues Trade issues All issues Multi-stakeholder Multi-stakeholderPublic and private sectorInter-ministerial coordination 5. II. TRADE POLICY MAKING PROCESS IN ZAMBIA: KEY CONSULTATIVE MECHANISMS Mandate/Membership Multi-stakeholder Public-Private sectors Only governmental Multiple issues including trade Zambia SCSAll trade issues Zambia NWGTZambia TEWGSpecific trade issues 6. III. CHALLENGES IN PARTICIPATION AS VIEWED BY STAKEHOLDERS
7. III. CHALLENGES IN PARTICIPATION AS VIEWED BY STAKEHOLDERS
8. III. CHALLENGES IN PARTICIPATION AS VIEWED BY STAKEHOLDERS
9. III. CHALLENGES IN PARTICIPATION AS VIEWED BY STAKEHOLDERS
10. IV. MEASURING INCLUSIVENESS: THE INCLUSIVE TRADE POLICY MAKING (ITPM) INDEX
Action Variable Possible Action Value A.Identification of all key stakeholdersYes = 1No = 0 Most identified = 0.75Some identified = 0.5 Few identified = 0.25 B.Creating awareness about the need for trade policy Yes = 1No = 0 Many efforts made = 0.75Some efforts made = 0.5 Few efforts made = 0.25 C.Establishment of formal consultative mechanisms Yes = 1No = 0 Established for most trade policy issues = 0.75 Established for some trade policy issues = 0.50 Established for few trade policy issues = 0.25 D.Regular functioning of formal consultative mechanisms Yes = 1No = 0 Functioning most of the time = 0.75 Irregular functioning = 0.5Ad hoc functioning = 0.25 E.Regular information flow to the stakeholders including on the content of trade policy Yes = 1No = 0 Information flowing most of the time = 0.75 Irregular information flow = 0.5Ad hoc information flow = 0.25 11. IV. MEASURING INCLUSIVENESS: THE INCLUSIVE TRADE POLICY MAKING (ITPM) INDEX
Action Variables Possible Action Value F, I, and L.Regular participation in the process and feedback to the relevant authorities Yes = 1No = 0 Most of the time = 0.75Irregular = 0.5 Little and / or ad hoc = 0.25 G, J, and M.Faithful representation of and regular feedback to the represented constituencies Yes = 1No = 0 Most of the time = 0.75 Occasional faithful representation and/or irregular feedback = 0.5 Little faithful representation and / or ad hoc feedback = 0.25 H, K, and N.Acquiring relevant knowledge and expertise Yes = 1No = 0 Substantial knowledge and expertise = 0.75 Some knowledge and expertise = 0.5 Little knowledge and expertise = 0.25 12. IV. MEASURING INCLUSIVENESS: THE INCLUSIVE TRADE POLICY MAKING (ITPM) INDEX
13. IV. MEASURING INCLUSIVENESS: THE INCLUSIVE TRADE POLICY MAKING (ITPM) INDEX
Action Variable Score A.Identification of all key stakeholders0.75 (most identified) B.Creating awareness about the need for trade policy 0.75 (many efforts made) C.Establishment of formal consultative mechanisms 1.00 (Yes) D.Regular functioning of formal consultative mechanisms 0.75 (functioning most of the time)E.Regular information flow to the stakeholders including on the content of trade policy 0.50 (irregular information flow) Total MCTI 3.75/5.00 14. IV. MEASURING INCLUSIVENESS: THE INCLUSIVE TRADE POLICY MAKING (ITPM) INDEX
Action Variables Score by Other Relevant Government Ministries Score by Private Sector Organizations Score by CSOs F, I, and L.Regular participation in the process and feedback to the relevant authorities 0.75 (most of the time) 1.00 (Yes) 1.00 (Yes) G, J, and M.Faithful representation of and regular feedback to the represented constituencies 0.50 (occasional faithful representation and/or irregular and feedback) 0.50 (occasional faithful representation and/or irregular and feedback) 0.50 (occasional faithful representation and/or irregular and feedback) H, K, and N.Acquiring relevant knowledge and expertise 0.50 (some knowledge and expertise) 0.50 (some knowledge and expertise) 0.50 (some knowledge and expertise) Total 1.75/3.00 2.00/3.00 2.00/3.00 15. ITPM Action Variable KENYA MALAWI TANZANIA UGANDA ZAMBIA Part I. Ministry responsible for Trade A.Identification of all key stakeholders 0.75 0.50 0.50 0.75 0.75 B.Creating awareness about the need for trade policy 0.75 0.50 0.50 0.25 0.75 C.Establishment of formal consultative mechanisms 0.75 1.00 0.75 1.00 1.00 D.Functioning of formal consultative mechanisms 0.75 0.75 0.50 0.50 0.75 E.Regular information flow to the stakeholders including on the content of trade policy 0.50 0.50 0.25 0.25 0.50 Part I Score 3.50/5.00 3.25/5.00 2.50/5.0 2.75/5.00 3.75/5.00 16. ITPM Action Variable KENYA MALAWI TANZANIA UGANDA ZAMBIA Part II. Other relevant government ministries/agencies F.Regular participation in the process and feedback to the relevant authorities 1.00 0.75 0.50 0.75 0.75 G.Faithful representation of and regular feedback to the represented constituencies 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 H.Acquiring relevant knowledge and expertise 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Part II Score 2.00/3.00 1.75/3.00 1.50/3.00 1.75/3.0 1.75/3.00 Part III. Private sector and business umbrella organizations I.Regular participation in the process and feedback to the relevant authorities 1.00 1.00 0.75 1.00 1.00 J.Faithful representation of and regular feedback to the represented constituencies 0.50 0.75 0.75 0.50 0.50 K.Acquiring relevant knowledge and expertise 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Part III Score 2.00/3.00 2.25/3.0 2.00/3.00 2.00/3.00 2.00/3.00 17. ITPM Action Variable KENYA MALAWI TANZANIA UGANDA ZAMBIA Part IV. Civil society organizations L.Regular participation in the process and feedback to the relevant authorities 0.75 0.25 0.50 0.25 1.00 M.Faithful representation of and regular feedback to the represented constituencies 0.75 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 N.Acquiring relevant knowledge and expertise 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.75 0.50 Part IV Score 2.00/3.00 1.25/3.00 1.50/3.00 1.75/3.00 2.00/3.00 ITPM Index Score 9.50/14.0 8.50/14.00 7.50/14.00 8.25/14.00 9.50/14.00 18. V. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
19. V. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
20. V. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
21. V. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
22.