1
DISCUSSION In early May, 2009 we were challenged to produce and distrib- ute clones for two emergent strains of Influenza A H1N1. We quickly made 20 Gateway ® compatible entry clones, and 54 ex- pression clones. The nucleoprotein (NP) was the most difficult target to PCR/clone using the LIC and Flexi methods. Within a month sequence verified clones were publicly available. Within this first month we expressed protein in E. coli and cell-free wheat germ and fabricated an assayable protein microarray. Within two months most of the ten proteins were transiently expressed in mammalian cells and one protein in insect cells. HaloTag TM fusion allowed direct spotting of crude cell lysates on the protein microarray. The HaloTag covalently bound the ligand coated microscope slide and thus enabled on-chip purifica- tion with minimal background signal. By eliminating the protein purification step the scale of production and prep time was sig- nificantly reduced. Surface exposed hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA) proteins are important for assaying immunosensitivity. We suc- cessfully secreted the HA-HaloTag fusion from human HEK-293 cells and observed a molecular weight down-shift with PNGase treatment suggesting HA glycosylation. The NA protein ex- pressed intracellularly but was not secreted. Only Matrix protein (M1) showed sensitivity when the protein microarray was chal- lenged with anti-H1N1 antibodies. strain to strain. ABSTRACT In May 2009, Swine-derived Influenza A H1N1 virus emerged as a serious threat to global health. With the threat came the need for the virology community to rapidly characterize this emergent subtype. To enable efficient distribution of materials for further characterization, a rapid cloning and protein expression process was implemented using two clinical isolates. Clones were made of all genomic segments/protein coding regions using three different cloning systems. Proteins were expressed in a cell-free system with a HaloTag TM fusion and immobilized on a HaloLink TM microar- ray substrate. The immobilized proteins were then challenged with anti-H1N1 antibodies to assess immunosensitivity. Mammal- ian and baculoviral (BEVS) systems were utilized to ensure glyco- sylation of HA and NA proteins. Clones were publicly available and protein microarrays made within one month after receiving H1N1 DNA. OBJECTIVES Rapidly respond to influenza A outbreak Clone & express H1N1 proteins Make clones publicly available in one month Fabricate protein microarray INTRODUCTION As new virus variants emerge novel approaches of vaccine de- velopment and rapid diagnostic screening are increasingly needed. Inactivated viruses or proteins purified from virus iso- lates are traditionally used for testing immunogenic response and for vaccine development. This process is time consuming and in- efficient and in some cases viruses cannot be cultured at all. Clearly more efficient alternatives are needed. Recombinant pro- tein technologies have the potential to provide a reliable source of antigens for ELISA testing and vaccine development. Once re- combinant proteins are selected, then means of expression and production have to be established. Here we describe rapidly going from sequencing to screening expression systems and generation of recombinant viral proteins using HaloTag TM technology (Promega Corp.) and H1N1 model system. Strains A/New York/1669/2009(H1N1) and A/New York/ 1682/2009(H1N1) were sequenced at the Genome Sequencing Center of Infectious Disease (GSCID). All ten influenza CDSʼs were PCR amplified and cloned using three systems (Gateway ® , Ligation Independent Cloning (LIC), Flexi TM ). Clones were se- quence verified and expressed immediately in E.coli (BL21(DE3)Magic) and cell-free wheat germ and subsequently in mammalian and insect cells. Most proteins expressed in all sys- tems and HA successfully secreted from human HEK-293 cells. HaloTag TM was used to immobilize recombinant proteins onto the HaloLink TM slide surface (Promega Corp.) and detected using an anti-HaloTag TM antibody. Influenza proteins were challenged with anti-H1N1 polyclonal antibodies; only matrix protein, M1, demon- strated antibody interaction. All entry and expression clones were made publicly available on June 5th, 2009 approximately 1 month after strain collection. METHODS & MATERIALS RESULTS Influenza A H1N1: A Rapid Approach to Cloning and Protein Expression Jeremy Hasseman 1 , Keehwan Kwon 1 , Getahun Tsegaye 1 , Patrick Burr 1 , Yu Do 1 , Julia Sosa 1 , Tigist Edeto 1 , Monica Gonzalez 1 , Padmavathi Tangirala 1 , Jason Stam 1 Sarah Grimshaw 1 , Carissa Grose 1 , Brian Bishop 1 , Ravi Sanka 1 , Marjeta Urh c , Nidhi Nath 2 , Jolanta Vidugiriene 2 , Danette Hartzell 2 , Robert Fleischmann 1 , Scott Peterson 1 1 Pathogen Functional Genomics Resource Center, J. Craig Venter Institute ~ Rockville, MD 2 Promega Corporation ~ Madison, WI RP-88 Funded By NIAID FUTURE DIRECTIONS Expand comparison to include more strains Alternate NA constructs for better secretion Comprehensive microarray comparison of proteins from all expression systems REFERENCES (1) Nelson M.I., Holmes E.C., The evolution of epidemic influenza. (2007) Nat Rev Gen 8: 196-205. (2) Ohana R.F., Encell L.P., et al. HaloTag7: A genetically engineered tag that en- hances bacterial expression of soluble proteins and improves protein pu- rification. (2009) Prot Exp Pur 68: 110-120. (3) Schwarzer J., Rapp E., et al. Glycan analysis in cell culture-based influenza vaccine production: Influence of host cell line and virus strain on the gly- cosylation pattern of viral hemagglutinin. (2009) Vaccine 27: 4325-4336. (4) Xu X., Zhu X., Structural characterization of the 1918 influenza virus H1N1 Neuraminidase. (2008) J of Virology 82 (21):10493-10501 (5) Jabbar M., Nayak D.P., Signal processing, glycosylation, and secretion of mu- tant hemagglutinins of human influenza virus by S. cerevisiae. (1987) Mol Cel Biol, 7 (4): 1476-1485. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Dis- eases, National Institute of Health, under contract no. N01-AI15447. Special thanks to David Spiro and the Genome Sequencing Center of Infectious Disease at JCVI for H1N1 dsDNA and initial sequence data. David Wentworth at Wadsworth Center, NY- DOH for dsDNA derived from clinical isolates. Also thanks to Mike Holmes, Joe Gil- bert, Erik Ferlanti and Shashikala Ratnayake for computational support. Clones Available at: http://pfgrc.jcvi.org/fir_index.php/fir/available_organisms.html ABRF Conference March 20-23, 2010 BACKGROUND Figure 9. In vivo Expression Levels: Titration of P2 viral stock of Matrix protien (M1) stained with TMR ligand. Comparison of phase contrast mi- croscopy with fluorescence microscopy. Figure 7. Protein Expression in Human Cell Line: Cells were collected and lysed in SDS and equivalent fractions run on a SDS-PAGE gel. A) Human HEK-293 cells transfected with pFC14A clones. Harvested after 24 hours transient expression and stained with TMR ligand. B) Neuraminidase (NA) expressed intracellularly but failed to secrete. C) At 48 hours after transfection 3 times more HA-HaloTag fusion protein is secreted vs. intracellular; the un- fused HaloTag negative control was not secreted. D) A down-shift in molecu- lar weight after PNGase treatment suggests secreted HA is glycosylated (red arrow). E. On-chip purification of secreted HA on HaloLink TM slide; no specific interaction with Anti-H1N1 antibodies observed. Cloning System Vector Fusion Tags Expression System Vector Source Gateway Ligation Inde- pendent (LIC) Flexi (Promega) pDONR221 (entry clone) - Invitrogen GW-cHalo N: His-Tag, C: HaloTag Cell Free (SP6), E.coli (T7) In-house pLIC-cHalo C: HaloTag Cell Free (SP6), E.coli (T7) In-house pFC20A C-term HaloTag Cell Free (SP6), E.coli (T7) Promega pFC14A C-term HaloTag Mammalian (CMV) Promega pF-BvH1 N-term HaloTag Baculoviral (PH) Promega pFCBvA C-term HaloTag Baculoviral (PH) In-house RELEASE BUDDING ATTACHMENT ENDOCYTOSIS, ACIDIFICATION FUSION/ UNCOATING TRANSLATION POST-TRANSLATION PROCESSING PACKAGING Nucleus Cytoplasm mRNA (+) cRNA (+) vRNA (-) MORPHOGENESIS Figure 3. 3D structure of HaloTag TM . Ha- loTag TM fusion protein convalently binds the TMR ligand allowing non-reversible binding to resin, solid substrate (HaloLink TM slide) or conjugated fluorophore. The 33kD tag is a modified hydrolase (2) . Table 1. Cloning and Expression. Expression clones of 10 influenza A pro- tein coding regions (CDS) were made using Gateway, Ligation Independent cloning (LIC) and Flexi TM (Promega) systems. Gateway entry clones were also made for all 8 genomic segments including untranslated regions (UTR). Figure 1. Overview of Influenza A Virus A) Influenza virus replication in eukaryotic cells. B) Diagram of viral structure (1) . Influenza is an enveloped virus containing 8 linear ssRNA(-) genomic pieces coding for 10 proteins. The hypervariable epitopes of the hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA) surface proteins make influenza virus a difficult target for treatment. Mammalian expression Baculoviral expression Figure 8. Viral titer determination: Sf9 insect cells were infected with differ- ent amounts of passage 2 (P2) virus containing Matrix protein 1 (M1) and la- beled with TMR. Cells was collected in 100ul of storage buffer and 15ul of the sample was loaded on the gel. Estimated expression level: ~ 3.50 ug/ 2x10 6 cells/1ml when compared to GST-HaloTag reference. Cloning/Expression Results Project Timeline !"#$%&’()* ,--./0)1"$% 2’"&(/$ 3/0’")’’)4 !"#$%" ’"()"#*+#, -"#."/ $0 1#0"*2$)3 4+3"53" 6 373."%3 !5."857 9:";+ <+,52$# 1#=">"#="#. ?<1-@ 2’"&(/$ 56-’(%%/"$ 7."$/$8 9(:;($0/$8 7./$/0). 9)*-./$8 A5=38$/.B -"#."/C D"8 E$/F 4">.G $0 H"5:.B I 3./5.",+"3 -"::J9/"" ?AB"5. !"/%@ KG *$:+ ?L<MN?4K6@O5,+*@ O5%%5:+5# ?HKPJMQ6@ L5*):$R+/)3 ?’9JQ@ -$R5:"#. 5S5*B%"#. 8+.B H5:$T5, 0)3+$# 1%%)#$,"#+*+.7 3*/""#+#, A. B. Figure 2. Project workflow. Rapid pathway from clinical sampling through sequencing, cloning and recombinant protein expression. Multiple cloning and expression systems employed to ensure high level of success. Figure 6. On-Chip purification using Halolink TM slides and gaskets. E. coli cell supernatants con- taining Halo-fusion recombinant proteins were de- posited in the gasketed wells. Excess sample and E. coli endogenous proteins were washed off with PBSI. Primary antibodies (A. Rabbit anti-HaloTag or B. Goat anti-H1N1 virions) were incubated, washed and followed by a secondary antibody in- cubation (A. Goat anti-Rabbit_alexa647 or B. Chicken anti-Goat_alexa647). E. coli supernatant was used as a negative control. Slides were scanned (Axon 4000B) following a final PBSI wash. Spot size is 3.3 mm. C. HaloTag standards (conc. 2.5 ug/uL,1.25ug/uL, 625ng/ul, 313ng/ul, 156 ng/ul.) detected with anti-HaloTag antibody D. HaloTag standards showing no specificity with anti-H1N1 polyclonal antibodies. A. B. Protein Microarray Figure 5. Clone/Expression Tally: Results of Gateway, LIC, and Flexi TM cloning and multiple expression systems. Removed transmembrane do- mains (HA & NA) to enhance solubility and secretion. Overall 20 entry clones and 54 expression clones were created and sequence verified. Most proteins cloned and expressed consistently; the NP protein could not be ex- pressed. (C=cloning, E=Expression, W=Wheat germ only, S=secreted, N=not secreted) Figure 4. Project Timeline: Wadsworth Center at New York Dept. of Health collected strains A/New York/1669/2009(H1N1) and A/New York/1682/ 2009(H1N1) and the GSCID at JCVI completed sequencing. Within one month PCR, cloning, expression, sequence validation, and protein microarray were completed. All clones were publicly available on June 5th, 2009 M1-HaloTag Protein 155 98 63 40 32 20 Intracell Secreted Secreted Intracell HA-HT -Control C. –PNGase +PNGase 155 98 63 40 32 D. A B C D PB2 HA-TM NA-TM M1 M2 NS1 NS2 PB1 PA (-) control N-terminus C-terminus HaloTag™ TMR Ligand !""# % &’(" ) *+ , -./("0 123" 4’5.67 829 : *+ , ;"(/167 0"<’"(76(= >-? -./(6(= @"<’"(7" A2.632B/( !+"2* ;"C1 DE4C"006/( !" $%&’ DE4C"006/( % 0* >C/*"6( 867C/2CC29 829 %% *+ , FGH 0214."0 /5*26("3 @"<’"(7" C"."20"3 !""# I !""# J !""# : Target GW Entry E.coli / in vitro Mamalian Baculovirus Seg CDS GW-cHalo pLIC-Halo pFC20A pFC14A pFBvH1 pFCBvA C C C E C E C E C E C E C E PB2 + + + - + + + + + + - N/A + N/A PB1 - + + +(W) + + + + + + + - + N/A PA + + + - + + - N/A - N/A + N/A - N/A HA-!TM + + + - + + + + + +(S) - N/A + N/A HA(whole) + + - N/A NP + + + - - N/A - N/A + - - N/A + N/A NA-!TM + + + - + + + + + +(N) + - + N/A NA(whole) + + - N/A M1 + + + - + + + + + + + + + N/A M2 + + - + + + N/A + + + N/A + N/A NS1 + + + - + + + N/A + + + N/A + N/A NS2 + + - + + + + + + + N/A + N/A Total 8 12 12 1 9 9 8 6 9 8 7 1 9 N/A E. (-) control Serum + Serum - Cell-free HaloTag Stds. Anti-H1N1 Anti-HaloTag

Influenza A H1N1: A Rapid Approach to Cloning and Protein … · 2017. 8. 29. · 2009(H1N1) and the GSCID at JCVI completed sequencing. Within one month PCR, cloning, expression,

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Influenza A H1N1: A Rapid Approach to Cloning and Protein … · 2017. 8. 29. · 2009(H1N1) and the GSCID at JCVI completed sequencing. Within one month PCR, cloning, expression,

DISCUSSION In early May, 2009 we were challenged to produce and distrib-ute clones for two emergent strains of Influenza A H1N1. We quickly made 20 Gateway® compatible entry clones, and 54 ex-pression clones. The nucleoprotein (NP) was the most difficult target to PCR/clone using the LIC and Flexi methods. Within a month sequence verified clones were publicly available. Within this first month we expressed protein in E. coli and cell-free wheat germ and fabricated an assayable protein microarray. Within two months most of the ten proteins were transiently expressed in mammalian cells and one protein in insect cells. HaloTagTM fusion allowed direct spotting of crude cell lysates on the protein microarray. The HaloTag covalently bound the ligand coated microscope slide and thus enabled on-chip purifica-tion with minimal background signal. By eliminating the protein purification step the scale of production and prep time was sig-nificantly reduced. Surface exposed hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA) proteins are important for assaying immunosensitivity. We suc-cessfully secreted the HA-HaloTag fusion from human HEK-293 cells and observed a molecular weight down-shift with PNGase treatment suggesting HA glycosylation. The NA protein ex-pressed intracellularly but was not secreted. Only Matrix protein (M1) showed sensitivity when the protein microarray was chal-lenged with anti-H1N1 antibodies. strain to strain.

ABSTRACT In May 2009, Swine-derived Influenza A H1N1 virus emerged as a serious threat to global health.  With the threat came the need for the virology community to rapidly characterize this emergent subtype.    To enable efficient distribution of materials for further characterization, a rapid cloning and protein expression process was implemented using two clinical isolates. Clones were made of all genomic segments/protein coding regions using three different cloning systems.  Proteins were expressed in a cell-free system with a HaloTagTM fusion and immobilized on a HaloLinkTM microar-ray substrate.   The immobilized proteins were then challenged with anti-H1N1 antibodies to assess immunosensitivity. Mammal-ian and baculoviral (BEVS) systems were utilized to ensure glyco-sylation of HA and NA proteins.  Clones were publicly available and protein microarrays made within one month after receiving H1N1 DNA.  

OBJECTIVES✦Rapidly respond to influenza A outbreak✦Clone & express H1N1 proteins✦Make clones publicly available in one month✦Fabricate protein microarray

INTRODUCTION As new virus variants emerge novel approaches of vaccine de-velopment and rapid diagnostic screening are increasingly needed. Inactivated viruses or proteins purified from virus iso-lates are traditionally used for testing immunogenic response and for vaccine development. This process is time consuming and in-efficient and in some cases viruses cannot be cultured at all. Clearly more efficient alternatives are needed. Recombinant pro-tein technologies have the potential to provide a reliable source of antigens for ELISA testing and vaccine development. Once re-combinant proteins are selected, then means of expression and production have to be established. Here we describe rapidly going from sequencing to screening expression systems and generation of recombinant viral proteins using HaloTagTM technology (Promega Corp.) and H1N1 model system. Strains A/New York/1669/2009(H1N1) and A/New York/1682/2009(H1N1) were sequenced at the Genome Sequencing Center of Infectious Disease (GSCID). All ten influenza CDSʼs were PCR amplified and cloned using three systems (Gateway®, Ligation Independent Cloning (LIC), FlexiTM). Clones were se-quence verified and expressed immediately in E.coli (BL21(DE3)Magic) and cell-free wheat germ and subsequently in mammalian and insect cells. Most proteins expressed in all sys-tems and HA successfully secreted from human HEK-293 cells. HaloTagTM was used to immobilize recombinant proteins onto the HaloLinkTM slide surface (Promega Corp.) and detected using an anti-HaloTagTM antibody. Influenza proteins were challenged with anti-H1N1 polyclonal antibodies; only matrix protein, M1, demon-strated antibody interaction. All entry and expression clones were made publicly available on June 5th, 2009 approximately 1 month after strain collection.

METHODS & MATERIALS

RESULTS

Influenza A H1N1: A Rapid Approach to Cloning and Protein ExpressionJeremy Hasseman1, Keehwan Kwon1, Getahun Tsegaye1, Patrick Burr1, Yu Do1, Julia Sosa1, Tigist Edeto1, Monica Gonzalez1, Padmavathi Tangirala1, Jason Stam1

Sarah Grimshaw1, Carissa Grose1, Brian Bishop1, Ravi Sanka1, Marjeta Urhc, Nidhi Nath2, Jolanta Vidugiriene2, Danette Hartzell2, Robert Fleischmann1, Scott Peterson1

1 Pathogen Functional Genomics Resource Center, J. Craig Venter Institute ~ Rockville, MD 2 Promega Corporation ~ Madison, WI

RP-88

Funded By NIAID

FUTURE DIRECTIONS ✦ Expand comparison to include more strains

✦ Alternate NA constructs for better secretion

✦ Comprehensive microarray comparison of proteins from all expression systems

REFERENCES(1) Nelson M.I., Holmes E.C., The evolution of epidemic influenza. (2007) Nat Rev

Gen 8: 196-205.(2) Ohana R.F., Encell L.P., et al. HaloTag7: A genetically engineered tag that en-

hances bacterial expression of soluble proteins and improves protein pu-rification. (2009) Prot Exp Pur 68: 110-120.

(3) Schwarzer J., Rapp E., et al. Glycan analysis in cell culture-based influenza vaccine production: Influence of host cell line and virus strain on the gly-cosylation pattern of viral hemagglutinin. (2009) Vaccine 27: 4325-4336.

(4) Xu X., Zhu X., Structural characterization of the 1918 influenza virus H1N1 Neuraminidase. (2008) J of Virology 82 (21):10493-10501

(5) Jabbar M., Nayak D.P., Signal processing, glycosylation, and secretion of mu-tant hemagglutinins of human influenza virus by S. cerevisiae. (1987) Mol Cel Biol, 7 (4): 1476-1485.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Dis-eases, National Institute of Health, under contract no. N01-AI15447. Special thanks to David Spiro and the Genome Sequencing Center of Infectious Disease at JCVI for H1N1 dsDNA and initial sequence data. David Wentworth at Wadsworth Center, NY-DOH for dsDNA derived from clinical isolates. Also thanks to Mike Holmes, Joe Gil-bert, Erik Ferlanti and Shashikala Ratnayake for computational support.

Clones Available at: http://pfgrc.jcvi.org/fir_index.php/fir/available_organisms.html

ABRF Conference March 20-23, 2010

BACKGROUND

Figure 9. In vivo Expression Levels: Titration of P2 viral stock of Matrix protien (M1) stained with TMR ligand. Comparison of phase contrast mi-croscopy with fluorescence microscopy.

Figure 7. Protein Expression in Human Cell Line: Cells were collected and lysed in SDS and equivalent fractions run on a SDS-PAGE gel. A) Human HEK-293 cells transfected with pFC14A clones. Harvested after 24 hours transient expression and stained with TMR ligand. B) Neuraminidase (NA) expressed intracellularly but failed to secrete. C) At 48 hours after transfection 3 times more HA-HaloTag fusion protein is secreted vs. intracellular; the un-fused HaloTag negative control was not secreted. D) A down-shift in molecu-lar weight after PNGase treatment suggests secreted HA is glycosylated (red arrow). E. On-chip purification of secreted HA on HaloLinkTM slide; no specific interaction with Anti-H1N1 antibodies observed.

Cloning System Vector Fusion Tags Expression System Vector Source

Gateway

Ligation Inde-pendent (LIC)

Flexi (Promega)

pDONR221 (entry clone) - Invitrogen

GW-cHalo N: His-Tag,C: HaloTag

Cell Free (SP6), E.coli (T7) In-house

pLIC-cHalo C: HaloTag Cell Free (SP6), E.coli (T7) In-house

pFC20A C-term HaloTag Cell Free (SP6), E.coli (T7) Promega

pFC14A C-term HaloTag Mammalian (CMV) Promega

pF-BvH1 N-term HaloTag Baculoviral (PH) Promega

pFCBvA C-term HaloTag Baculoviral (PH) In-house

RELEASE

BUDDING ATTACHMENT

ENDOCYTOSIS,

ACIDIFICATION

FUSION/

UNCOATING

TRANSLATION

POST-TRANSLATION

PROCESSING PACKAGING

Nucleus

Cytoplasm

mRNA (+)

cRNA (+)

vRNA (-)

MORPHOGENESIS

Figure 3. 3D structure of HaloTagTM. Ha-loTagTM fusion protein convalently binds the TMR ligand allowing non-reversible binding to resin, solid substrate (HaloLinkTM slide) or conjugated fluorophore. The 33kD tag is a modified hydrolase(2).

Table 1. Cloning and Expression. Expression clones of 10 influenza A pro-tein coding regions (CDS) were made using Gateway, Ligation Independent cloning (LIC) and FlexiTM (Promega) systems. Gateway entry clones were also made for all 8 genomic segments including untranslated regions (UTR).

Figure 1. Overview of Influenza A Virus A) Influenza virus replication in eukaryotic cells. B) Diagram of viral structure(1). Influenza is an enveloped virus containing 8 linear ssRNA(-) genomic pieces coding for 10 proteins. The hypervariable epitopes of the hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA) surface proteins make influenza virus a difficult target for treatment.

Mammalian expression

Baculoviral expression

Figure 8. Viral titer determination: Sf9 insect cells were infected with differ-ent amounts of passage 2 (P2) virus containing Matrix protein 1 (M1) and la-beled with TMR. Cells was collected in 100ul of storage buffer and 15ul of the sample was loaded on the gel. Estimated expression level: ~ 3.50 ug/2x106cells/1ml when compared to GST-HaloTag reference.

Cloning/Expression Results

Project Timeline

!"#$%&'()*+,--./0)1"$%+

2'"&(/$+3/0'")'')4+

!"#$%"&'"()"#*+#,&&

-"#."/&$0&1#0"*2$)3&4+3"53"&&

6&373."%3&

!5."857&

9:";+&

<+,52$#&1#=">"#="#.&?<1-@&

2'"&(/$+56-'(%%/"$+

7."$/$8+

9(:;($0/$8+

7./$/0).+9)*-./$8+&A5=38$/.B&-"#."/C&&

D"8&E$/F&4">.G&$0&H"5:.B&

I&3./5.",+"3&

-"::J9/""&?AB"5.&!"/%@&

KG&*$:+&?L<MN?4K6@O5,+*@&

O5%%5:+5#&?HKPJMQ6@&

L5*):$R+/)3&?'9JQ@&

-$R5:"#.&5S5*B%"#.&&

8+.B&H5:$T5,&0)3+$#&

1%%)#$,"#+*+.7&3*/""#+#,&

A.

B.

Figure 2. Project workflow. Rapid pathway from clinical sampling through sequencing, cloning and recombinant protein expression. Multiple cloning and expression systems employed to ensure high level of success.

Figure 6. On-Chip purification using HalolinkTM slides and gaskets. E. coli cell supernatants con-taining Halo-fusion recombinant proteins were de-posited in the gasketed wells. Excess sample and E. coli endogenous proteins were washed off with PBSI. Primary antibodies (A. Rabbit anti-HaloTag or B. Goat anti-H1N1 virions) were incubated, washed and followed by a secondary antibody in-cubation (A. Goat anti-Rabbit_alexa647 or B. Chicken anti-Goat_alexa647). E. coli supernatant was used as a negative control. Slides were scanned (Axon 4000B) following a final PBSI wash. Spot size is 3.3 mm. C. HaloTag standards (conc. 2.5 ug/uL,1.25ug/uL, 625ng/ul, 313ng/ul, 156 ng/ul.) detected with anti-HaloTag antibody D. HaloTag standards showing no specificity with anti-H1N1 polyclonal antibodies.

A. B.

Protein Microarray

Figure 5. Clone/Expression Tally: Results of Gateway, LIC, and FlexiTM cloning and multiple expression systems. Removed transmembrane do-mains (HA & NA) to enhance solubility and secretion. Overall 20 entry clones and 54 expression clones were created and sequence verified. Most proteins cloned and expressed consistently; the NP protein could not be ex-pressed. (C=cloning, E=Expression, W=Wheat germ only, S=secreted, N=not secreted)

Figure 4. Project Timeline: Wadsworth Center at New York Dept. of Health collected strains A/New York/1669/2009(H1N1) and A/New York/1682/2009(H1N1) and the GSCID at JCVI completed sequencing. Within one month PCR, cloning, expression, sequence validation, and protein microarray were completed. All clones were publicly available on June 5th, 2009

M1-HaloTag Protein

155

98

63

40

32

20

Intr

acel

l Sec

rete

d

Sec

rete

d

Intr

acel

l

HA-HT -Control

C.

–PNGase +PNGase

155

98

63

40

32

Secreted HA-Halo

Glycosylation

D.

A B

C

D

PB2

HA-TM

NA-TM

M1

M2

NS1

NS2

PB1

PA

(-) control

N-terminus

C-terminus

HaloTag™ TMR

Ligand

!""#$%$

&'("$)*+,$-./("0$123"$4'5.67$

829$:*+,$;"(/167$0"<'"(76(=$

>-?$

-./(6(=$

@"<'"(7"$A2.632B/($

!+"2*$;"C1$DE4C"006/($

!"#$%&'$DE4C"006/($

$%0*$>C/*"6($867C/2CC29$

829$%%*+,$FGH$0214."0$/5*26("3$

@"<'"(7"$C"."20"3$

!""#$I$ !""#$J$ !""#$:$

Target

GW Entry E.coli / in vitro Mamalian Baculovirus

Seg CDS GW-cHalo pLIC-Halo pFC20A pFC14A pFBvH1 pFCBvA

C C C E C E C E C E C E C E

PB2 + + + - + + + + + + - N/A + N/A

PB1 - + + +(W) + + + + + + + - + N/A

PA + + + - + + - N/A - N/A + N/A - N/A

HA-!TM +

+ + - + + + + + +(S) - N/A + N/A

HA(whole) + + - N/A

NP + + + - - N/A - N/A + - - N/A + N/A

NA-!TM +

+ + - + + + + + +(N) + - + N/A

NA(whole) + + - N/A

M1 +

+ + - + + + + + + + + + N/A

M2 + + - + + + N/A + + + N/A + N/A

NS1 +

+ + - + + + N/A + + + N/A + N/A

NS2 + + - + + + + + + + N/A + N/A

Total 8 12 12 1 9 9 8 6 9 8 7 1 9 N/A

E.

(-) control

Serum +

Serum -

Cell-free

Ha

loTag

Std

s.

Anti-H

1N1

Anti-H

aloTa

g