283
STUDY OF PHYSICRL PROPERTIES OF CERTAIN BORATE GLASSES Submitted to the Mahatma Gandhi University in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Physics under the Faculty of Science BY K. SHREEKRISHNA KUMAR M. Sc., M. Phil. SCHOOL OF PURE ~r APPLIED PHYSICS MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY KOTTAYAM

INFLIBNET Centreietd.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/389/3/03_certificate.pdf · DECLARATION I do hereby declare that the thesis entitled, "SlULlY OF PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF CERTAIN

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

STUDY OF PHYSICRL PROPERTIES OF CERTAIN BORATE GLASSES

Submitted to the Mahatma Gandhi University

in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the

award of the Degree of

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY

in Physics under the Faculty of Science

BY K. SHREEKRISHNA K U M A R M. Sc., M. Phil.

SCHOOL OF PURE ~r APPLIED PHYSICS MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY

KOTTAYAM

.... fo my parents

D E C L A R A T I O N

I do hereby dec lare t h a t t he t h e s i s e n t i t l e d , "SlULlY OF PHYSICAL

PROPERTIES OF CERTAIN BORATE GLASSES" i s a bonaf ide record o f t he

research work carr ied ou t by me under t he guidance and d i r e c t

superv i s ion o f D r . U . ABJJULKHADAR, Reader, School o f Pure and

Applied Physics , Mahatma Gandhi U n i v e r s i t y , Kottayam. No part o f t h i s

t h e s i s has been presented f o r any o the r degree or diploma e a r l i e r .

Priyadarshini H i l l s 3D.12.1993.

K . SHREWCRISHNA KOlWl Research Scholar School o f Pure and Applied Physics Mahatma Gandhi U n i v e r s i t y Kottayam

C E R T I F I C A T E

This i s t o c e r t i f y that the t h e s i s e n t i t l e d , "STLIDY OF PHYSICAL

PROPERTIES OF CERTAIN BORATE GLASSES", i s an authentic record o f the

research work carried out by Mr. SHREMRISHNA KlJHAl? under my guidance

and supervision i n part ial f u l f i l m e n t o f the requirements for the

award o f the degree o f WClYlR OF PHILOSOPHY under the Faculty o f

Science o f the Mahatma Gandhi Univers i ty , Kottayam. The work

presented i n t h i s t h e s i s has not been submitted for any other degree

or diploma e a r l i e r .

Priyadarshini H i l l s 30.12.1993.

Dr . H. ABDULKHADAR Reader School o f Pure and Applied Physics Mahatma Gandhi Univers i ty

. . Kottayam. . ..

A C K N O W L E D G E M E N T S

I wish to place on record my profound sense of

gratitude to my esteemed guide Dr. M. Abdulkhadar, Reader,

School of Pure and Applied Physics, Mahatma Gandhi

University under whose guidance and direct supervision the

present work was carried out. I am indebted to him for

his inspiring guidance, keen interest and constant

encouragement throughout the course of this work. His

sincere dedication to research has always been a cause of

inspiration to me.

I am grateful to Dr. M.A. Ittyachen, Professor and

Director, School of Pure and Applied Physics, Mahatma

Gandhi University for providing me the basic facilities to

carry out this work and his constant advices and

suggestions throughout the course of my research work. I

also thank all the teaching staff for their help and

cooperation.

May I express my heart-felt sense of gratitude to

Prof. Prakash P. Karat, Mangalore University for taking me

to the field of research.

I owe sincere thanks to Dr. K.G.K. Warrier, Scientist,

RRL, Thiruvananthapuram and his research associates, and

Prof. Babu Joseph and Prof. Girija Vallabhan, Cochin

University for extending laboratory facilities in carrying

out the dielectric measurements.

I express my thanks to Regional Sophisticated

Instrumentation Centre, I.I.T. Madras for recording the

Laser Raman Spectra.

I am indebted to my colleagues Mr. Jugan J. and

Mr. Roshan Abraham for their valuable help and

encouragement at the various stages of my work.

My sincere thanks are due to Mr. Dileep Kumar,

Mr. Binny Thomas and Mr. Anilkumar, School of Pure and

Applied Physics, Mahatma Gandhi University for their

continued help at various stages of my work.

I express my sincere thanks to my friends

Mr. Ajithkumar, Research Scholar, School of Pure and

Applied Physics, Mr. George V. Thomas, Mr. G. Unnikrishnan,

I . Sajit T., Mr. G.D. Gem Mathew, Mr. Cyriac Joseph,

Mr. Vinu, Mr. Saji and Miss. Latha M.S., for their whole

hearted help and cooperation.

My thanks are also due to the non-teaching staff,

research scholars, postgraduate students of School of

Pure and Applied physics, Mahatma Gandhi University for

their cooperation.

I am thankful to Mahatma Gandhi University for

providing me the financial support during the course of

this work.

I am grateful to Dr. Mammootty, Director, LBS Centre

for Science and Technology and Prof. M.A. Muliyar,

Principal, College of Engineering, Kasargod for providing

me the essential leave and the encouragement to complete

the work.

My special thanks are due to M/s. LASER WRITE,

Ettumanoor, for the Word processing and Photocopying of

this work.

My special thanks are also due to my parents and my

sister for their constant encouragement throughout the

period of my work.

Finally, I thank all those who have helped me

directly or indirectly.

K. SHREEKRISHNA KUMAR

C O N T E N T S

Page

PREFACE '

cEAPTER1 GENEWL INTRODUCTION

1.1 Introduction 1.2 Definitions of Glass 1.3 Differences Between Crystalline and

Amorphous Solids 1.4 Formation of Glasses 1.4.1 Thermodynamics of glass formation 1.4.2 Glass or network formers and network

modifiers 1.5 Kinetics of Glass Formation 1.6 Preparation of Amorphous Materials

(Glasses) 1.7 Types of Glasses 1.8 Structure of Glasses 1.8.1 Structure of silicate glasses 1.8.2 Structure of borate glasses 1.9 Research Work Undertaken in the

Present Investigation References

CBAPPW2 EXPERIMENTAL TECHNIQUES

2.1 Introduction 2.2 preparation of Glass Sammples 2.3 Measurement of d.c Conductivity 2.4 Measurement of ~ielectric Constant

and a.c Conductivity 2.5 Ultrasonic Measurements 2.6 Laser Raman Spectroscopy References

cBApTw3 D.C.CONDUCTTVITY STUDIES ON CaO-B 0 -Al 0 -Na 0 AND Ca0-B203-A1203-Pe203 GLASS SY&~&~S

2 3 2

3.1 Introduction

PART I REVIEW OF D.C.COMIUCTIVITY STUDIES ON OXIDE GLASSES CONTAINING ALKALI/ TRANSITION-METAL OXIDES

3.2 Introduction 6 1 3.3 D.C Conductivity Studies on Oxide Glasses

Containing Alakali Oxides -- A Review 6 2 3.4 D.C Conductivity Studies on Oxide Glasses

Containing Transition-Metal Oxides- A Review 72

PART 11 STUDY OF D.C CONDUCTIVITY IN CaO-B o - A1203-Ne20 GLASS SYSTEM

2 3

3.5 Introduction 3.6 Experimental Details 3.6.1 Glass composition 3.6.2 Preparation of glass samples 3.6.3 Measurement of d.c. conductivity in

CaO-B 0 -A1 0 -Na 0 glass system 3.7 ~ e s u l ~ s ~ a n d ~ ~ ? s c u ~ s i o n 3.8 Conclusion

PART I11 STUDY OP D.C. CONDUCTIVITY IN CaO-B203- A1203-Pe 0 GLASS SYSTEM

2 3

3.9 Introduction 3.10 Experimental Details 3.11 Results and Discussion 3.12 Conclusion References

CEAPTW 4 DIELECTRIC CONSTANT AND A.C CONDUCTIVITY STUDIES ON CaO-B 0 -Al 0 -Na 0 AND CaO-B 0 -Al 0 -Fe 0 GLASS SY~& 2 2 3 2 3 2 3

4.1 Introduction

PART I REVIEW OF DIELECTRIC CONSTANT AND A.C. CONDUCTIVITY SlUDIES ON OXIDE GLASSES CONTAINING ALKALI/TRANSITION- METAL OXIDE

4.2 Review 120

PART 11 STUDY OF DIELECTRIC CONSTANT 'AND A.C. CUM)UCTIVITY IN C ~ O - B ~ O ~ - A ~ ~ O ~ - N ~ ~ O GLASS SYSTEM

4.3 Introduction 130 4.4 Experimental Details 130 4.4.1 Glass composition and measurement of

dielectric constant and a.c conductivity 130 4.5 Results and Discussion 132 4.6 Conclusion 154

PART I11 STUDY OF DIELECTRIC CONSTANT AND A.C CONDUCTIVITY I N CaO-B 0 - A l 0 -Pe 0 GLASS SYSTEM

2 3 2 3 2 3

4.7 Introduction 4.8 Experimental Details 4.9 Results and Discussion 4.10 Conclusion References

CHAPTER 5 L A S W RAMAN STUDIES ON QUARTERNARY GLASS SYSTEM CaO-B 0 -Al 0 -Na 0 AND CaO-B 0 -Al 0 -Pe 0

2 3 2 3 2 2 3 2 3 2 3

5 .1 Introduction 5.2 A short Review 5.3 Work Undertaken in the Present Study 5.4 Experimental Details 5.5 Results and Discussion 5.6 Conclusion References

- 6 ULTRASONIC STUDIES ON CaO-B 0 -Al 0 -Na 0 AND Ca0-B203-A1203-Pe2O3 ~Li.54 S Y ~ ~

6.1 Introduction 6.2 Ultrasonic Investigations in Oxide

Glasses -- A Brief Review 6.3 Theory 6.4 Work Undertaken in the Present Study 6.5 Experimental Details 6.6 Results and Discussion 6.7 Conclusion References

TREFACE

Glass is one of the oldest synthetic materials used

by man and knowledge of glass has been acquired over many

centuries. Scientific study of glasses began with Faraday

and others at the beginning of the nineteenth century and

today it is still a rapidly developing subject, both in

the development of new glassy materials with special

properties and in the application of new scientific

nethods to improve our understanding of the structure and

properties of ylasses. The ever increasing interest on

glasses is motivated by their widespread practical

agglications and by the fact that they exhibit a number of

physical properties, which suggest specific structural

sin9ularities that differentiate the glassy state of

matter from the crystalline as well as the ordinary

anorphous state. So far, however, a unified theory of

glassy state has failed to emerge, and so the specifies of

the structure of glasses continue to be less than fully

understood.

Glasses have some unique properties which are not

found in other engineering materials. The combination of

hardness and transparency at room temperature along with

sufficient strength and excellent corrosion resistance

make glasses indispensible for many practical

applications. Glassy materials are generally good

electrical insulators and glassy metals are more resistant

to chemical attack than polycrystalline metals. In recent

years the growth of the new field of solid state ionics

has caused renewed interest in the properties of glassy

ionic conductors. Glassy materials have acknowledged

advanta~es like physical isotropy, the absence of grain

boundaries, continuously variable composition and good

workability over their crystalline counter parts.

Due to potential practical applications in various

engineering and technological fields, the study of the

properties of glasses is of great significance. Recent

years have seen notable achievements in the development of

new glass systems with interesting properties. Continued

effort for the development of new glassy materials and

study of their properties is highly relevant in view of

the role these materials are expected to play in

technological fields.

CaO-B 0 -A1 0 glass system usually known as cabal 2 3 2 3

glass system has exceptionally high resistance. Sir

Herbert Jackson at the British Scientific Instruments

Research Association rras the person who first prepared

this glass and coined the name 'cabal' glass. The

electrical properties of this system of glass was first

studied by Owen. Owen reported that it has a very high

resistance and it acts almost as an insulator. The

present work deals with the study of the effect of

addition of an alkali oxide like Na 0 or a transition 2

metal oxide like Fe 0 on the physical properties of cabal 2 3

glasses. Cabal glasses containing different mole

percentages (mol%) of Na 0 or Fe 0 were prepared and 2 2 3

their d.c. conductivity, a.c. conductivity and dielectric

constant were studied in detail. The vibrational

properties of these glasses were studied using laser Raman

spectroscopy. The elastic properties of the glass samples

were investi~ated using ultrasonic techniques.

The thesis entitled, "Study of Physical Properties of

Certain Borate Glasses" is a detailed account of the

investigations carried out on the preparation, d.c.

conductivity, a.c. conductivity and dielectric constant,

vibrational properties using laser Raman spectroscopy and

elastic properties of cabal glasses containing Na20 or

Fe203.

The thesis is divided into six chapters. Chapter 1

provides a general introduction to amorphous materials

(especially slasses) and their importance in various

fields. A brief report on the various techniques of

preparation, different types of glasses, structure of

glasses and thermodynamic behaviour of glasses are also

included.

Chapter 2 gives a brief account of the various

instruments used for the preparation of glass systems and

their characterization. For the preparation of glasses an

horizontal muffle furnace and quenching system were used.

The d.c. conductivity was studied using a conductivity

cell and a prosrammable Keithley electrometer. a.c.

conductivity and dielectric constant measurements were

made with the help of a Hewlett-Packard impedance analyser

(4192A LF). The structure of the glass system was

investigated using laser Raman spectrometer. An

ultrasonic pulse-echo overlap system was used to

investigate the ultrasonic velocity and elastic constants

of the glass system.

Part I of Chapter 3 gives a brief review of the

earlier studies on d.c. electrical conductivity in alkali

and transition metal oxide containing oxide glass systems.

The pr*paration and d.c conductivity studies of Na O-CaO- 2

6 2 0 3 - ~ 1 2 ~ 3 and Fe 0 -CaO-B 0 -A1 0 2 3 2 3 2 3

glass systems

investigated in the present work are described in Part I1

and Part I11 respectively. The popular technique of

splat-quenching was used for the preparation of the glass

systems and amorphous nature of the glass samples was

confirmed with X-ray diffraction patterns. The effects of

~ a + , ca2+ and ~ 1 ~ + ions on conductivity were

systematically investigated by preparing three series of

glass samples containing varying concentrations of Na20,

CaO or A1203. Conductivity measurements were carried out

over a temperature range from 300 to 525 K. It was

observed that by the addition of the alkali oxide (Na20)

the insulator-like cabal glass system can be made

conducting to a reasonable extent. The author has also

made an attempt to make the glass system electronic

conducting by the addition of a transition metal oxide

Fe203. To make the study a systematic one, the effects of

Fe203, CaO and A1203 in this glass system were studied by

preparing three series of glass samples containing varying

concentrations of Fe 0 CaO or A1 0 2 3' 2 3' It was observed

that the d.c. conductivity of this glass system vary with

temperature and with the concentration of . t h e

constituents. The experimental results are discussed on

the basis of ionic and polaronic conducting models. It is

concluded that the insulator type cabal glass system can

be made conducting to a reasonable extent by the

incorporation of Na 0 or Fe 0 to the glass system. 2 2 3

A brief review of the recent studies on dielectric

constant and a.c. conductivity measurements in oxide

glasses is given in Part I of the Chapter 4. Part I1 and

Part I11 respectively deal with the measurement of real I

part of dielectric constant ( ) and a.c. conductivity

( 6ac) of Na 0-Ca0-B203-A1 0 and Fe 0 -CaO-B203-A1 0 2 2 3 2 3 2 3

glass systems. - The measurements were carried out with the

help of Hewlett-Packard impedance analyzer (4192A L F )

having a frequency range from 5Hz to 13MHz. Variation of

&I and b a c with frequency and temperature has been

studied for glasses containing different mol% of the

constituents. It is observed that the values of I' and

b a c depend on the temperature, frequency of the applied

field and the concentration of the constituents. The

experimental results are discussed on the basis of the

existing theories.

A brief review of laser Raman studies on borate

glasses is given in the beginning of Chapter 5. Chapter 5

describes the laser Raman studies of vibrational

properties of the glass systems Na20-CaO-B 0 -A1 0 and 2 3 2 3

Fe 0 -CaO-B 0 -A1203. 2 3 2 3 Since the glass system lacks long-

range periodicity the laser Raman spectra of glasses are

important for getting an insight into the structure of

glasses. The peaks in the spectra are discussed in the

light of reported spectra of other borate glasses. The

effects of variation of composition of the glasses on the

vibrational frequencies are studied.

vii

Chapter 6 provides an account of the ultrasonic

investigations carried out on the glass systems Na O-CaO- 2

B 0 -A1 0 and Fe203-CaO-B 0 -A1203. 2 3 2 3 2 3 A brief introduction

to elastic properties of solids and a short review of

recent ultrasonic studies on oxide glasses are given in

the beginning of Chapter 6. In this chapter, the author

presents the experimental results and discussions of

ultrasonic velocity and elastic constant measurements as a

function of composition of the Na20-CaO-B 0 -A1203 and 2 3

Fe 0 -CaO-B 0 -A1 0 glass systems. 2 3 2 3 2 3

Parts of the research work presented in this thesis

are published/communicated for publication or presented/

accepted for publication in National/International

Journals or Seminars.

1. Influence of Na20 on the d.c electrical conductivity (rnakeriak acd cyp1ications)

of cabal glasses, Solid State IonicsA, 499 (1992).

2. Dielectric constant and a.c conductivity of B2°3-

A1203-Na20-Ca0 glass system, J. Mat. Sci.

Lett. (communicated).

3. Dielectric properties of cabal glasses containing

Fe 0 2 3' Solid State Physics Symposium, BARC, Bombay,

(December 1993)(accepted for publication in the

proceedings).

4. d.c electrical conductivity of B203-Zn0-Ca0 glass

system, Proceedings of the Third Kerala Science

Congress, Kozhikode, 296 (Feb. 1991).

5. d.c conductivity of cabal glass system containing

Fe203, xxvth National Seminar on Crystallography-

Abstracts, Madras University, Madras (Dec. 1993).

6. Study of enhancement of d.c conductivity of cabal

glasses, Proceedings of the sixth Kerala Science

Congress, Thiruvananthapuram (Jan. 1994)(accepted for

publication).

7. Laser Raman study of Cao-B203-A1 0 -Na 0 and Cao- 2 3 2

B 0 -A1 0 -Fe203 glass systems(communicated). 2 3 2 3

8. Ultrasonic velocity and elastic constants

measurements of CaO-B 0 -A1 0 -Fe 0 2 3 2 3 2 3 glass

systems (communicated).

9. d.c conductivity measurements in Fe203 containing

cabal glasses (communicated).

+ 10. Effect of Na , Ca 2 + and ~ 1 ~ ' ions in the d.c

conductivity of CaO-B 0 -A1 0 -Na20 and CaO-B 0 - 2 3 2 3 2 3

Al2o3-~e2o3 glasses(conmunicated).

CHAPTER 1

GENERAL INTRODUCTION

CHAPTER 1

GENERAL INTRODUCTION

1.1. Introduction

The term 'glass' is commonly used to mean the fusion

products of inorganic materials which have been cooled to

a rigid condition without crystallization'.Glass is one

of the oldest synthetic materials used by man and the

present knowledge of glass has been acquired over many

centuries. Scientific study of glass began with Faraday

and others at the beginning of nineteenth century and

today it is still a rapidly developing subject, both in

the development of new glassy materials with special

properties for specific applications and in the

application of new scientific techniques to improve our

understanding of the structure and behaviour of glass.

Glasses have some unique properties which are not

found in other engineering materials. The combination of

hardness and transparency at room temperature along with

sufficient strength and excellent corrosion resistance

make glasses indispensible for many practical

applications. Glasses are generally good electrical

insulators. Also glassy metals are more resistant to

chemicals attack such as corrosion than polycrystalline

metals[l].

Recently, there has been renewed interest in the

properties of glassy ionic conductors[2-71. In part this

reflects a demand for new fast ion conductors and the

growth of the new field of solid state ionics. Glasses

have acknowledged advantages over crystalline electrolytes

including physical isotropy, the absence of grain

boundaries, continuously variable composition and good

workability.

1.2. Definitions of Glass

The increase in the scientific knowledge about

glasses caused a change in the definition of glasses.

In 1930, glass was defined as an amorphous solid, i.e., a

structureless solid[8]. In 1938, it was redefined as an

inorganic substance in a condition which is continuous

with and analogous to the liquid state of that substance,

but which, as a result of reversible change in viscosity

during cooling, has attained so high a degree of viscosity

that for all practical purposes it may be treated as

rigid[9]. In 1949, American Society for Testing

Materials (ASTM) defined glass as an inorganic product of

fusion which is cooled to a rigid condition without

crystallization[lO]. Later in 1960, glass was defined as

a non-crystalline solid[ll].

Again in 1968, glass was redefined as an amorphous

solid which exhibits a glass transition[l2]. Glass

transition exhibits more or less an abrupt change in the

thermodynamic properties, such as heat capacity, thermal

expansivity etc.

1.3. Differences Between Crystalline and Amorphous Solids

On the basis of atomic arrangement, solids may be

broadly classified into two categories. (i) crystalline

and (ii) amorphous.

In crystalline solids, both long-range and short-

range order exist in the arrangement of atoms while in

amorphous solids only short-range order exists. Figure 1.1

represents the schematic representation of the ordered

crystalline form and random network amorphous form of the

same composition. Due to the short-range periodicity in

the atomic arrangement, the degree of disorder will be

greater in an amorphous solid than its crystalline

counterpart and it will be having a higher entropy

F i q l . . Schematic representation of (a) ordered crystalline form and ( b ) random network amorphous form of the same composition.

compared to the crystalline phase. Therefore amorphous

state is a non-equilibrium state. So, on cooling from

liquid phase to the solid phase, a crystalline solid is

obtained as a transformation from one equilibrium state to

another while in amorphous solid, the transformation is

from an equilibrium state to a non-equilibrium state. Due

to the random arrangement of atoms, amorphous materials

exhibit isotropic properties while crystalline solids

exhibit anisotropic properties.

1.4. Formation of Glasses

There exist certain well-defined properties which are

common to all types of glasses (oxides, halides,

chalcogenides, etc) and are different from those of

liquids and crystalline solids. Diffraction studies using

X-rays and electrons have shown that glasses lack long

range periodicity. The atomic arrangement in glass is just

as in the liquid phase.

Unlike crystals, glasses do not have a sharp melting

point and do not cleave in preferred directions.. Like

crystalline solids they show elasticity - a glass fibre

can be bent almost double in the hand and, when released,

springs back to its original shape; like liquids, they

flow under a shear stress but only if it is very high.

Thus one can see that the glassy form of matter combines

the 'short-time' rigidity characteristic of the

crystalline state with a little of the long-time fluidity

of the liquid state. Glasses like liquids are isotropic,

a property which is of immense value in their use for a

variety of purposes.

1.4.1. Thermodynamics of glass formation

There are two main types of pathways that a liquid

may follow on cooling to the solid state: either it may

crystallize at or below the melting temperature, Tmr or it

may undercool sufficiently to form a glass without

crystallization. A glass is generally obtained by cooling

a liquid below its freezing point. The classical

explanation for the glass formation is that, when a liquid

is cooled, its fluidity which is the reciprocal of

viscosity decreases and, at a certain temperature, below

the freezing point, becomes nearly zero. That is, the

liquid becomes rigid. Figure 1.2 represents the volume-

temperature characteristics for crystal, liquid and glass.

When a liquid is cooled to form a solid, the resulting

cooling curve shows distinct differences from those of the

crystalline and amorphous solids. When a liquid

solidifies into a crystalline state there is a marked

To Tg3 Tg* Jg,Tm

Temperature .-+

Fig.l.2. Volume-temperature characteristics for crystal, liquid and glass.

discontinuity in the volume at a well-defined temperature

called the 'melting point', Tm'

of the material. However,

if no crystallization occurs, the volume of the liquid

decreases at about the same rate as above the melting

point until there is a decrease in the expansion

coefficient in a range of temperature called glass

transformation range. In other words, the liquid- glass

cooling curve does not show any discontinuity. The curve,

however, shows a change of slope at a temperature called

'glass transition (transformation) temperature', T . 9

Below this temperature range the glass structure does not

relax at the cooling rate used. The expansion coefficient

for the glassy state is usually about the same as that for

the crystalline solid.

Glass transition temperature mainly depends on the

rate of cooling of the melt. i-e., T is not a well- 9

defined one and is a function of cooling rate. Slower the

rate of cooling, lower is the value of T . However, T g 9

cannot be reduced indefinitely. Angell[l3] in 1970

pointed out that T cannot be lower than a particular g

minimum temperature called the ideal glass transition

temperature, To

. The explanation for this is found by

considering the relative heat capacities and entropies of

liquid and crystalline phases of the same composition.

The glass transition temperature can be determined by

differential thermal analysis (DTA) or differential

scanning calorimetry (DSC).

1.4.2. Glass or network formers and network modifiers

Glasses have been prepared using different types of

materials. The ability of a substance to form a glass

does not depend upon any particular physical or chemical

property. It is now generally agreed that almost any

substance, if cooled sufficiently fast could be obtained

in the glassy state although in practice crystallization

intervenes in many substances.

B2°3' Si02, Ge02 and P205, all of which come from a

certain area of the periodic table readily form glasses on

their own when their melts are cooled and are commonly

known as 'glass formers'. These are oxides of elements

with intermediate electronegativity: these elements are

sufficiently electropositive to form ionic structures,

such as MgO and NaCl, but also are not sufficiently

electronegative to form covalently bonded, small molecular

structures, such as C 0 2 . Instead, bonding is usually a

mixture of ionic and covalent and the structures are best

regarded as three-dimensional polymeric structures. As203

and Sb203 also produce glass on their own when cooled very

rapidly. Te02, SeO Moo3, W03, Bi 0 A1203, Ga203 and 2' 2 3'

V205 will not form glasses on their own, but each will do

so when melted with a suitable quantity of certain other

non-slass forming oxide. Hence they are known as

'conditional glass formers' according to Rawson[l4].

There are some oxides like Na 0, Li20, K20, PbO and 2

CaO which when added in small quantities (10 mol% to

15 mol%) to the glass network forming oxides produce

drastic changes (melting point, conductivity, etc.) in the

properties of the later. Such oxides also modify the

network structure of the glass and hence they are termed

as 'glass or network modifiers'. The changes that are

produced by these modifiers in the glass network is shown

in figure 1.3.

Various attempts were made to explain the glass

forming tendency of the oxides. Goldschmidt's

criterion[l5] gives a correlation between the ability to

form a glass and the relative sizes of the oxygen anion

and cation. According to him, glass forming oxides are

those for which the ratio of ionic radii of anion and

cation lie in the range 0.2 to 0.4 and have four anions

around each cation, the anions being situated at the

Fig.1.3. Two-dimensional network of sodium-silicate glass.

corners of a tetrahedron. In otherwords, a tetrahedral

configuration of the oxide is a pre-requisite for glass

formation.

Zachariasen[l6] in 1932, pointed out that the

Goldschmidt's criterion was not satisfactory even as an

emperical rule, since not all oxides having a radius ratio

in the specified range are glass formers, Be0 being one

such case (RBe/Ro = 0.221; RBe - Radius of Be and

Ro - Radius of oxygen). Zachariasen considered the

relative glass-forming ability of simple oxides and

concluded that the ideal condition for glass formation is

that the material should be capable of forming an extended

three-dimensional network structure without any long-range

order. Since, the mechanical properties and density of an

oxide glass are similar to those of the corresponding

crystal, the interatomic distances and interatomic forces

in crystals and glassy state must be similar.

Zachariasen[l6] pointed out that because of the random

network, internal energy of glass is slightly higher than

that of the corresponding crystal which suggests that the

polyhedra of the same type as in the crystal must be

joined together in a similar way in the glass. For

example, consider the glass which is made up of silicon

dioxide (SiO ) which not only illustrates many structural 2

features but also is a major constituent of most

commercial glasses. The crystalline form of silica

contains SiO tetrahedra joined at the corners. Glassy 4

(vitreous) silica must also contain SiO tetrahedra joined 4

at their corners. The only difference between crystalline

and vitreous silica is that the relative orientation of

adjacent tetrahedra is variable in the former where as in

the later it is constant throughout the structure.

The generally accepted view of the structure of Si02

glass is largely same as that proposed by Zachariasen and

supported by the X-ray diffraction results of Warren[l7].

Zachariasen has put forward a set of emperical rules known

as Zachariasen's rules which an oxide must satisfy if it

is to be a glass former:

(i) No oxygen atom may be linked to more than two atoms.

(ii) The coordination number of oxygen atoms is small

(probably 3 or 4).

(iii) The oxygen polyhedra share corners with each other,

not edges or faces.

(iv) The polyhedra link upto form a three-dimensional

network. i.e., at least three corners of each

polyhedron should be shared.

Zachariasen's hypothesis for glass formation has been

more or less universally accepted. The alkali and

alkaline-earth oxides like Na20, K 0, Li20, BaO, CaO, MgO 2

which do not satisfy Zachariasen's rules cannot form

glasses. Oxides like Si02, B203, Ge02, etc. satisfy these

emperical rules and are good glass forming oxides.

Zachariasen extended these rules to multicomponent

glasses also with a few additional modifications viz.,

(i) the sample contains high percentage of cations which

are surrounded by oxygen tetrahedra or triangles,

(ii) these tetrahedra or triangles share only corners with

each other, and (iii) some oxygen atoms are linked to

only two such cations and do not form further bonds with

any other cations. In terms of Zachariasen's model for

glass formation, a 'network forming oxide' is an oxide

which forms part of 'vitreous framework' and 'network

modifying oxide' is an oxide which does not form part of

the network.

Another important hypothesis regarding glass

formation was put forward by Snekal[l8], known as Smekal's

mixed bonding hypothesis. According to Smekal, pure

covalent bonds have sharply defined bond-lengths and bond-

angles and these are incompatible with the random

arrangement of the atoms in glass. On the otherhand,

purely ionic or metallic bonds completely lack any

directional characteristics. Thus the presence of

'mixed' chemical bonding in a material is necessary for

glass formation. Glass forming substances with mixed

bonding are divided into three categories by Smekal:

(i) inorganic compounds like B 0 Si02; in this case the 2 3'

bonds are partly covalent and partly ionic.

(ii) elements like S, Se having chain structures with

covalent bonds within the chains and van der Waals forces

between the chains and (iii) organic compounds

containing large molecules with covalent bonds within the

molecule and van der Waals forces between them.

Sun[l9] in 1947 proposed a criterion for the

correlation between the structural features and the glass

forming tendency of simple oxides. Since the process of

atomic rearrangement which takesplace during the

crystallization of a material may involve the breaking and

reforming of interatomic bonds, it may be reasonable to

expect a correlation between the strength of these bonds

and the ability of the material to form a glass[l91. The

stronger the bonds, the more sluggish will be the

rearrangement process and hence more readily will a glass

be formed. Sun[l9] showed that the glass forming oxides

- 1 have bond strength greater than 330 KJ mol , whereas

modifier ions, which are not part of the network

structures, have bond-strengths that are below this value.

Rawson[l4] modified Sun's criterion and related glass

forming tendency to the ratio of bond-strength to melting

temperature. This ratio accounts for both the bond-

strength and the thermal energy available to break the

bonds, which depends on temperature. It is vitrually

impossible to crystallize B203 glass and thus can be

understood from Rawson's criterion, since B203 has a

relatively low melting point, 4 0 0 ~ ~ . This criterion may

also explain why, in binary systems, the glass forming

compositions are often located around the low melting

eutectics.

1.5. Kinetics of glass formation

In order for a glass to form, the rate of

crystallization of the undercooled liquid must be

sufficiently slow that crystallization does not occur

during cooling. Crystallization of an undercooled liquid

is a two stage process that involves the formation of

crystal nuclei followed by their subsequent growth. A

kinetic condition for glass formation is that the rate of

nucleation and/or the rate of crystal growth should be

slow. In some undercooled liquids, nucleation is easy

because there are plenty of nucleation sites available;

foreign particles, container surfaces, etc. can act as

nucleation sites. The rate of crystallization is then

largely controlled by the rate of growth, which varies

with temperature in a manner shown in figure 1.4. The

rate is zero at the melting point, increases to a maximum

at a certain degree of undercooling and then falls to zero

again at still lower temperatures.

At lower temperatures, especially for glass forming

liquids, the viscosity of the undercooled liquid becomes

increasingly important. With increasing viscosity, the

diffusion of atoms or ions through the liquid to the

surface of the growing nuclei becomes increasingly

difficult and the rate of crystallization tends to

decrease accordingly.

With decreasing temperature, there are two competing

effects. The increased difference in free energy between

crystals and liquid favours crystallization whereas the

increased viscosity of the undercooled liquid reduces the

tendency for crystallization. The peak in the

crystallization (figure 1.4) corresponds to the situation

where these two competing effects have equal weight. On

the low temperature side of the peak, the viscosity effect

dominates whereas on the high temperature side it is the

difference in free energy between crystals and the liquid

that predominates.

RATE OF CRYSTALLIZATION -+

Tm

Dependence of rate of crystallization undercooled liquid on temperature.

>

-

+ W u 3 ----------- b 4. u W

4--- a

DANGER

z ZONE w FOR c GLASS

FORMATION

.f ---------------

In considering the crystallization of undercooled

liquids (figure 1.4) and the ability to form a glass,

there is a 'danger zone' for glass formation that

corresponds to the maximum in the crystallization rates.

If it is possible to undercool a liquid through this

danger zone, it should be relatively safe from subsequent

crystallization (or devitrification) and the liquid will

form a kinetically stable glass.

1.6. Preparation of amorphous materials (glasses)

There are atleast a dozen different techniques that

can be used to prepare materials in the amorphous state.

Of these, the following are commonly used in one form or

another to produce most non-crystalline (amorphous)

materials of commercial or academic interest. They are

(i ) thermal evaporation

(ii) melt quenching method

(iii) sputtering

(iv) glow discharge decomposition

(v) chemical vapour deposition

(vi) sol-gel method

(a) splat quenching

(b) melt spinning

(c) roller quenching

The commercially used methods for the preparation of

glasses are briefly discussed below.

(i) Thermal evaporation

This method is widely used to prepare amorphous thin

films of semiconductors and chalcogenide glasses. It is

one of the several ways of producing amorphous solids

from a vapour. In this method, the starting material is

vaporised and is collected on a substrate. The thermal

evaporation technique is performed in vacuum (about

Torr) to reduce contamination and to avoid the effect

due to scattering. The material is evaporated by heating

in a molybdenum or tungsten 'boat' or by bombarding with

high energy electrons from an electron gun and the

vapours are collected on a cold substrate. The essential

feature of thermal evaporation is that atomic surface

mobility is greatly diminished because of the cold

substrate, causing the atom to be frozen in the random

positions at which they arrive. The principal advantage

of thermal evaporation as a preparative technique lies in

the variability in purity and composition of the films.

The quality of the resulting film developed by this

method depends on (a) the substrate temperature (b)

distance between the source and substrate and their

orientation (c) pressure in the chamber and (d) the

filament (boat) temperature.

(ii) Melt-quenching technique

Many materials need sufficiently rapid quenching in

order that the melt solidifies into glass. Commonly used

melt quenching methods are (a) splat quenching (b)

melt-spinning and (c) roller quenching.

(a) Splat quenching: This is the oldest but most

established method for the preparation of amorphous

materials. In this method the melt is cooled

sufficiently quickly, which is referred to as 'quick

cooling'. The method is particularly useful in the

preparation of metallic glasses and the cooling rates may

8 lie in the range lo5 to 10 K/sec. This is the method

used for the preparation of glasses in the present study

and is discussed in detail in chapter 3.

(b) Melt spinning method: This is the most commonly used

rapid liquid quenching technique (figure 1.5) to obtain

glasses in the form of long ribbons of uniform cross

section and having reproducible properties. This method

is widely used for the commercial production of amorphous

alloys.

A melt-spinner consists of a disc, usually of copper,

which is to be rotated at high speed (figure 1.5). The

alloy is melted by r.f. induction heating under an inert

helium or argon atmosphere. The ejection of the alloy

melt is achieved by increasing the inert gas pressure

through a fine nozzle at the bottom of a refractory tube

of the spinning disc. The dynamic melt puddle impinging

on the moving substrate is solidified and is thrown out of

the wheel in the form of a ribbon by the centrifugal force

after travelling with it over a short distance. Some of

the main process variables affecting the properties of

the ribbons are the amount of superheating, i.e., the

temperature in excess of the liquidus temperature of the

alloy, the jet velocity, the angle of ejection, the

dimension and shape of the orifice, the speed of the

spinning disc, the temperature and nature of the surface

finish of the substrate, and the atmosphere.

(c) Roller quenching method: In this method, the melt is

propelled onto a cooled rotating drum as shown in

figure 1.6. The amorphous material (glass) thus obtained

is in the form of a thin ribbon. This method has the

advantage of producing glassy ribbons of uniform

thickness. Usually this method is used to prepare glassy

metals. In this method the cooling rates are of the order

8 of lo6 to 10 K/sec.

Fig.1.5. Schematic diagram of melt-spinning technique.

GAS I PRESSURE

EJECTED MELT I

GLASSY COOLED RIBBON ROTATING / COPPER DRUM

~i~.1.6. schematic diagram of roller-quenching technique-

(iii) Sputtering

Besides the rapid liquid quenching, the most commonly

used technique for the preparation of glassy

semiconductors and metals is sputtering. Sputtering is

the process by which atoms or molecular groups are

released from a target under the bombardment of positive

ions. The major advantage of this technique is that it is

not regulated by classical thermodynamics and Gibbs phase

rule. Hence, unlike methods involving rapid quenching of

liquids which require homogeneous melt, this technique can

be used to make new materials without regard to solid

solubility and immisibility. Further, the process of

sputtering does not degrade the properties of substrate.

The simplest way to induce sputtering is to apply a high

negative voltage to the target surface, thereby attracting

positive ions from the plasma. However, this d.c.

sputtering process is only feasible for targets composed

of metals, or atleast consisting of materials which are

sufficiently electrically conducting so that the target

can act as an electrode. In sputtering process, the

following factors are very significant. (i) sputtering

gas pressure (ii) r.f. power applied to target (iii)

bias voltage of target or substrate (iv) ratio of

partial pressures of reactive gas to inert gas.

(iv) Glow-discharge decomposition

This method is also used to prepare amorphous solids

of semiconductors in the form of thin films. This

technique, like sputtering relies on the production of a

plasma in a low pressure gas, but instead of ions from a

plasma ejecting materials from the target, chemical

decomposition of the gas itself takes place leading to

deposition of a solid film on a substrate placed in the

plasma.

(v) Chemical vapour deposition (CVD)

This method is used to prepare amorphous solids of

polycrystalline materials. Chemical vapour deposition is

similar to the glow discharge method in that both depend

on the decomposition of vapour species. In this CVD

method, chemical decomposition of a vapour takes place

leading to deposition of a solid film on a substrate

placed in plasma.

(vi) Sol-gel method

This is a new method for preparing glassy materials.

The advantage of this technique is that, it is a low

temperature glass preparation method. The method for

producing amorphous materials via sol-gel method has

considerable technological promises[20]. The sol-gel

method has its greatest usefulness for those system which

give rise to very viscous melts near the melting point, or

alternatively which have extremely high melting points and

hence pose considerable technical problems in actually

being able to make glass by melt quenching.

Recently, a technique called ion implantation has

been extensively used for modifying the properties of the

surface layers of thin films especially of semiconductors.

In this technique high speed ions are allowed to impinge

on the surface. These ions travel a short distance and

get embedded within the top few atomic layers of the

material. In this process the quenching rate is estimated

to be about 1014 K/sec. It is possible to produce

amorphous para-surface layers in crystalline solids by

implanting ions in high doss. In electropolished Fe, Co

+ + and Ni foils by implanting B and P at low energy of 40

KeV and high doss of lo1' ions/cm2 amorphous thin films at

the surface of the samples can be produced without much

difficulty.

In addition, there are methods like laser glazing

technique, electrolytic deposition, etc. to prepare

amorphous materials.

1.7. Types of glasses

Glasses are not restricted to inorganic silicates but

form in widely different types of materials. Glasses may

be broadly classified into different groups according to

their chemical composition and their type of bond

(Table 1.1) as follows.

(i) Oxide glasses (silicates, borates, phosphates, etc.)

(ii) Chalcogenide glasses

(iii) Metallic glasses.

Table 1.1. Classification of glass forming materials in terms of chemical bonding

Bond type Glass-forming materials

Covalent Oxide glasses (silicates, borates, phosphates etc), chalcogenides, organic high polymers.

Hydrated ionic Aqueous salt solutions

Ionic Halides, nitrides, sulphates

Molecular or vander Waals Splat-cooled alloys or metallic

(i) Oxide glasses

Silicate glasses : Among oxide glasses,

commercially important and extensively studied are the

silicate glasses (Si02 based glasses). In silicate

glasses SiOZ is the glass former and the study of its

structure and properties has been very important in

understanding the chemically more complex silicate

glasses. These glasses have immense applications in

various fields due to its chemical and weathering

stability.

Borate glasses: Boron trioxide is a significant

component of glasses, enamels and glazes. It is very

rarely added to the raw material mixtures in the form of

oxide, more frequent use being made of H BO or Na2B40,. 3 3

Boron oxide (B 0 ) usually occurs in the glassy form which 2 3

is virtually incapable of direct crystallization. The

crystalline forms of B 0 can only be prepared by special 2 3

procedure. Although borate glasses are of little

commercial importance because they are water soluble, B2°3

is an important constituent of borosilicate glasses such

as Pyrex. In contrast to Si02 and silicate glasses in

which the silicon is present as Si04 tetrahedra, B 0 2 3

glasses contain BO triangular units and 3

B04 tetrahedra

depending on the composition. Addition of alkali oxide to

glassy B203 gives rather different results from those

obtained in the corresponding alkali silicates. The

structure of borate glasses are explained in detail in

section 1.8.

(ii) Chalcogenide glasses

Chalcogenides (elements of group 6 A in the periodic

table) like sulphur and selenium give viscous liquids on

melting which rapidly form glasses on cooling. Glassy or

amorphous semiconductors can be made from the chalcogens

either alone or in combination with other elements. In

this type of glasses, the bonding is fairly covalent and

the melt contain rings and chains of sulphur and selenium

atoms. The chalcogenide based glasses are semiconductors

and usually have electronic conductivities in the range

to 10 -1 -1 -I3 ohm cm . These glasses are used as

optical elements in the instruments for the infrared

region, where they transmit radiation of considerably

longer wavelengths than oxide glasses; however they show

very strong absorption in the visible region.

(iii) Metallic glasses

Usually, liquid metals do not form glasses, but

recently certain compositions have been shown to do so.

Some particular metallic compositions may be quenched very

fast to yield glasses and usually, at least two elements

must be present in the melt composition. One of these is

a conventional metal, eg., a transition-metal element

such as iron or palladium and the other is an element on

the metal insulator border line. In order to prepare

glassy metals, special ultra rapid quenching techniques

like splat quenching or roller quenching are necessary.

The cooling rates are usually of the order of lo6 to

8 10 K/sec.

Glassy metals are much stronger than crystalline

metals. These are resistant to chemical attack. Some

glasses containing cobalt and iron have low coercivity and

may be easily magnetized and demagnetized.

1.8. Structure of glasses

Several techniques, both microscopic and macroscopic,

have been developed for the study of the structure and

properties of glasses. By measuring the viscosity,

density and electrical conductivity of glass system, one

can get an insight in to the structure of the glass121-261.

Structural studies have been carried out by several

investigators127-311, using electron spin resonance

(ESR), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), Raman, IR and

Mossbauer spectroscopy, and X-ray diffraction.

1.8.1. Structure of silicate glasses

Structure of glasses lacks long-range periodicity in

the atomic arrangement. The X-ray and spectroscopic

studies may be used for obtaining information about the

structure of glass systems. The generally accepted view of

the structure of glassy Si02 is largely the same as that

proposed by Zachariasen[l6] and supported by the

X-ray diffraction results of Warren[8]. The structure is

built up of corner-sharing Si04 tetrahedra which link up

to form a three-dimensional network that lacks long-range

periodicity. In order to maintain electroneutrality, each

corner oxygen is shared between only two tetrahedra and

consequently the structure is rather open.

Due to the absence of a unit cell in a glass

structure, the X-ray diffraction pattern of glasses is

very diffuse, consisting of broad humps rather than

sharp peaks. (The comparison of glassy and crystalline

X-ray diffraction patterns of Si02 is shown in figure 1.7).

The only information that can be obtained from the X-ray

studies is the radial distribution curve (figure 1.8).

This is a curve plotted between pair distribution function

and the interatomic distance. From this one can find out

the probability of finding a second atom as a function of

~ i g . 1 . 7 . X-ray powder d i f f r a c t i i o n p a t t e r n o f ( a ) c r y s t a l l i n e SiO and (bl g l a s s y SiO

2 2 '

INTERATOMIC DISTANCES (il

~ i g . l . 8 . X-ray d i f f r a c t i o n r e s u l t s f o r S i 0 2 g l a s s .

distance from a chosen atom. From the figure 1.8, it is

obvious that the probability of finding a second atom is

represented on the ordinate by a pair distribution

function and the straight line gives the results expected

for the hypothetical material that consists of a random

array of non-interacting point atoms.

The structure and properties of silica based glasses

(binary, ternary, etc.) is not only dependent on Si02

structure, but also on the nature and concentration of

other oxides (modifier oxides) which are added to Si02.

Addition of modifier oxides like alkali or alkaline-earth

oxides to the network forming oxides leads to the breakage

of Si-0-Si bonds creating non-bridging oxygens and the

modifier cations remain at the interstitials of the

network. In otherwords, the silica network is gradually

broken up as more of the alkali or alkaline-earth oxide is

added. If the concentration of the modifier oxide is

increased, the ratio of silicon to oxygen will be

decreased. That means more and more non-bridging oxygen

atoms will be formed and the network will be rather open.

In otherwords, if the alkali concentration is more :

eg., if there are two sodium ions to each silicon ion as

in Na 0 - SiO glass system) some of the tetrahedra will 2 2

be unlinked from the network of the linked tetrahedra.

In this case, the viscosity of the liquid phase will be

markedly lower and it becomes increasingly difficult to

form glasses at higher alkali concentrations.

1.8.2. Structure of borate glasses

In contrast to silicate glass in which silicon is

present as SiO tetrahedra, borate glass contains a 4

mixture of B03 triangles and B04 tetrahedra depending on

conposition. An important constituent of vitreous B 0 is 2 3

boroxol group (figure 1.9). It is a planar, six memebered

ring of alternate boron and oxygen atoms which are

randomly connected in a three-dimensional network by

sharing all the three oxygen atoms with adjacent B03

units. However, with the planar coordination of boron, in

comparison with the tetrahedral coordination of silicon in

Si02, glassy B 0 has a rather open structure. Molten B 0 2 3 2 3

is also more fluid than molten SiO 2 -

Using X-ray

diffraction and various spectroscopic studies, the

triangular coordination of boron in B 0 glass can be 2 3

deduced.

The addition of alkali oxide to glassy B203 gives

rather different results than those obtained in the

corresponding alkali silicates and an effect known as the

boron oxide anomaly is observed. It was shown that a

Fig.l.9. Scnernatic representation of boroxol group B = Boron, 0 = Oxygen.

gradual change in the coordination number of boron from

three to four occurs as alkali oxide is added. By

combining Raman scattering studies and the NMR

investigations with the available crystallographic data,

structural groups present in these glasses have been

clearly identified. Figure 1.10 shows the several

structural groups present in various borate compounds.

Pure B 2 0 3 consists of planar BO units which are 3

randomly distributed in a three-dimensional network by

sharing all the three oxygen atoms with adjacent B03

units. The planar B 0 3 unit presumably involved in sp 2

hybridization, with the third orbital being vacant and

extending in direction perpendicular to the B03 plane.

This vacant orbital accepts an electron from the unpaired

electrons from the oxygen atoms, forming a partial double

bond.

The following modifications in the network can be

enhanced by the addition of network modifying oxides.

(a) Boron-oxygen-boron bonds may be broken by oxygen

anions (as in the case of the breakdown of silica network)

to form non-bridging atoms, (b) a filled orbital of an

oxygen anion may overlap with an empty p-orbital of a

boron atom resulting in a change of hybridization of the

3 boron atom to the sp tetrahedra arrangement leading to

BOROXOL R I N G

'B -0

P E N T A B O R A T E G R O U P

T E T R A B O R A T E G R O U P

T R I B O R A T E G R O U P

D l - T R I B O R A T E GROUP

D l - P E N T A B O R A T E GROUP

a

RING-TYPE M E I A B O I ? A l E

I

- 9 - B - 0 - 0 - 0 -

I A I 0 e -0 - 0

C t i AIN-TYPE M E T A B O R A l E GROUP

Fig.l.10. Structural groupings in borate glasses.

B04 tetrahedron with three bridging and one non-bridging

oxygen, (c) an oxygen atom may contribute an electron pair

to two BO units changing the coordination of the two 3

2 3 borons from sp to sp hybridization and with no non-

bridging oxygen.

Several attempts[32] were made to explain the

structure of borate glass on the basis of a number of

imaginative structural models, all of which were built

around the relatively unique ability of boron to exist

in two distinct coordination state. However NMR

studies[33,34] showed that the four coordinated boron

varies smoothly as x/(l-x) where x varied from 0 to

30 mol% modifier oxide without any unusual behaviour in

the critical range 15-20 mol% of modifier oxide. The B04

groups are bonded to the rest of the structure in four

directions and the structure is therefore tied together in

three dimensions rather than two. This will produce a

marked increase in the strength and tightness of the

Structure.

11 Bray has shown[26,281 using B NMR spectroscopy that

a gradual change in the coordination number of boron from

three fold to four occurs as alkali oxide is added to

B2°3' By the time about 30 mol% has been added,

approximately 40 per cent of the borons would have changed

to tetrahedral coordination and this is independent of the

nature of the alkali. In triangular coordination, the B 11

nucleus shows strong quadrupole coupling with a broad

resonance line whereas in tetrahedral coordination, the

quadrupole coupling is weak and the resonance is narrow.

Extensive investigations have been carried out on

crystalline and glassy borates by Krough-Moe[ZO] who

proposed a new model for the structure of borate glass.

Krough-Moe suggested that borate glasses are not merely a

random network of 80 triangles and B04 tetrahedra joined 3

at the corners, but, they actually contain well-defined

and stable groups as segments of the disordered frame

work. These borate groups which are included in the glass

structure should be indentical with the groupings which

occur in crystalline borates. From the experimental

results of thermodynamic[35] and infrared[36] studies the

structural groupings in borate glasses can be classified

into four different groupings. viz., boroxol ,

pentaborate, triborate and diborate groups (figure 1.10).

the pentaborate and triborate groups will always occur in

pairs and these pairs are referred to as tetraborate

groups.

Boron oxide anomaly

This is a peculiar property of borate glasses and

which cannot be seen in the boron-free glasses. In the

system Na20-B203, for example, viscosity of the melt

increases with increase in the alkali oxide content and

passes through a maximum at 16 mol% Na20. Similarly the

properties like coefficient of thermal expansion also show

either minimum or maximum around this composition. This

peculiar effect is known as boron oxide anomaly. A fully

accepted explanation of the boron oxide anomaly is not yet

reported. A partial explanation of the boron oxide

anomaly is that with small amounts of added alkali oxide,

some boron atoms change to tetrahedral coordination and

these act to 'tie-in' the network by increasing the

viscosity. Thus the boron to oxygen ratio, which is 1:1.5

in B203, increases towards the value 1:2, which is the

value in the vitreous B 0 as alkali oxide is added. A 2 3'

fully tetrahedral network could be achieved, in theory

even at 50 per cent alkali oxide, but it appears that long

before this situation is reached, the viscosity will start

to decrease again.

1.9. Research work undertaken in the present investigation

Preparation of glassy materials and the study of

their physical properties have gained much importance due

to their immense applications. Continued efforts which

may throw more light on the properties of already

prepared glasses and to synthesize new glassy materials

exhibiting practically useful properties are relevent in

view of the role glassy materials are expected to play in

technological and scientific areas.

The research work presented in this thesis consist of

the properties of the quarternary glass systems CaO-B203-

A1 0 -Na20 and CaO-B 0 -A1203-Fe203. 2 3 2 3 The glass system

CaO-B 0 -A1203 2 3

usually known as cabal glasses is

characterized by a very high electrical resistance due to

the lack of mobile charge carriers. The incorporation of

an alkali oxide like Na 0 or a transition-metal oxide like 2

Fe203 in cabal glass is expected to generate either

mobile ions or electrons, respectively, which may enhance

the conductivity of the glass system. In the present

investigation, the d.c and a.c conductivity, and

dielectric constant of the glass systems CaO-B 0 -A1 0 - 2 3 2 3

Na20 and CaO-B 0 -A1203-Fe203 are systematically studied 2 3

for different compositions of the glasses and over a wide

range of temperature. The structure of the glasses is

investigated using laser Raman spectroscopy. Ultrasonic

velocities in the glass samples have been measured using

ultrasonic pulse-echo overlap technique and thereby the

elastic constants of the glasses of different compositions

have been estimated.

References

1. Robert H. Doremus, "Glass Science", John Wiley & Sons, Inc. p.4 (1973).

2. Ingram M.D. and Vincent C.A., Chem. Soc. Ann. Repts. A23 (1977).

3. Ravaine D., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 38, 353 (1980).

4. Tuller H.L., Button D.P. and Uhlmann D.R., J. Non- Cryst. Solids 40, 93 (1980).

5. Souquet J.L., A. Rev. Mater. Sci. 11, 211 (1981).

6. Ingram M.D., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 73, 247 (1985).

7. Angell C.A., Solid State Ionics 9, 3 (1983).

9. Morey G.W., "The Properties of Glasses", 2nd Edition, Reinhold, N.Y. (1954).

10. Stanworth J.E., J. Soc. Glass. Technol. 30, 56 (1946).

11. Secrist D.R. and Mackenzie J.D., "Modern Aspects of the Vitreous State", Vo1.3, Butterworths, London (1960).

12. Elliot S.R., "Physics of Amorphous Materials", Longmann, London (1982).

13. Angel1 C.A., J. Chem. Educ. 47, 583 (1970).

14. Rawson M., "Proceedings of the IV International Congress on Glass", Imprimorice Chaix, Paris, p.62 (1956).

15. Goldschmidt V.M., Trans. Faraday. Soc. 25, 253 (1929).

16. Zachariasen W.H., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 54, 3841 (1932).

17. Warren B.E., X-ray Diffraction, Addison Wesley (1969).

Smekal A., J. Soc. Glass Technol. 35, 411 (1951).

Sun K.H., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 30, 277 (1947).

Krough-Moe, J. Phys. Chem. Glasses, 1, 26 (1960).

St. Barth and Feltz A., Solid State Ionics, 34, 41 (1989).

Ingram M.D., Phys. Chem. Glasses, 28, 215 (1987).

Ahmed M.M., Hogarth C.A and Ghauri M.A., J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 3, 341 (1984).

Lapp J.C. and Shelby J.E., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 68, 368 (1985).

Kukjiam C.R. and Douglas R.W., Phys. Chem. Glasses, 1, 19 (1960).

Bray P.J., Hintenlang D.E., Mulkern R.V. et al., J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 56, 27 (1972).

Muller-Warmuth W. and Eckert H., Phys. Rep. 88, 92, 41 (1982).

Bray P.J. and Gravina S.J., Mater. Sci. Res. 19, 1 (1985).

Konijnendijk W.L. and Stevels J.M., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 18, 307 (1975).

Meera B.N., Sood A.K., Chandrabhas N. and Ramakrishna J., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 126, 224 (1990).

Videane J. J., Portier J. and Piriou B., J. Non- Cryst. Solids 48, 385 (1982).

Pye L.D., Frechette V.D. and Kredil N.J., "Borate Glass", Plenum Press (1977).

Savabsib S.E., Forskubd E. and Krough Moe J., J. Phys. Chem. 66, 174 (1962).

Bray P.J. and O'Keefe J.G.. Phys. Chem. Glasses 4, 37 (1963).

Krough-Moe, J. Phys. Chem. Glasses 3, 101 (1962).

Krough-Moe, J. Phys. Chem. Glasses 6, 46 (1965).

CHAPTER 2

EXPERIMENTAL TECHNIQUES

CHAPTER 2

EXPERIMENTAL TECHNIQUES

2.1. Introduction

The present work deals with the preparation of

certain borate glass systems and study of their physical

properties using different experimental techniques. First

of all the amorphous nature of the prepared glass system

was confirmed by recording the X-ray diffraction patterns.

The structure of the glass system was studied with the

help of laser Raman spectra. d.c and a.c conductivity and

dielectric constant studies were also undertaken. Finally,

ultrasonic techniques were used to determine the

ultrasonic velocity in glass systems of different

compositions and thereby to determine the elastic

constants of the glasses. A brief description of the

various instruments used in the present study is given

in the following sections.

2.2. Preparation of glass samples

The preparation of the glass samples was carried out

by the splat-quenching technique which is described in

detail in section 3.7 of chapter 3. A horizontal muffle

furnace was used for melting the glass forming mixture

and the melt was quenched by using the quenching device

consisting of two circular brass discs (figure 2.1).

2.3. Measurement of d.c conductivity

d.c conductivity measurments were carried out by

keeping the glass samples in a specially fabricated

stainless steel conductivity cell. The schematic diagram

of the conductivity cell is shown in figure 2.2. This

consists of a steel vessel of about 20 cm diameter and

40 cm height with a wall of thickness of about 1 cm.

Another cylindrical brass vessel 5 cm in diameter and

50 cm in height with a wall of thickness 0.2 cm is placed

inside the outer cylindrical vessel. At the bottom end of

the inner cylindrical vessel there is an arrangement

consisting of a pair of spring-loaded electrodes. The

glass samples for conductivity measurements can be held

gently between these electrodes. The temperature of the

sample can be varied by adjusting the current through a

heater filament. A chromel-alumel thermocouple is used

for the measurement of temperature.

Fig. 2.1 Quenching device used for the preparation of glass samples.

Fig. 2 . 2 Cross-Sectional view of the conductivity cell.

- 1. MultalicChambor 3 - DNC Camectiano 5. Cold L l w e r 7. Electrodes 9 . Spring loaded iscmws

1 . Vacuum PUIUP

2 . O -.rlryl 4 l lmtor Coll G. Sample 8. TeRm insulator

10. Teflon washore

For measuring the resistance of the sample, a very

sensitive and accurate electrometer (Keithley Model 617

programmable electrometer) was used. Figure 2.3

represents the block diagram of the experimental set up

for the measurement of d.c conductivity with the Keithley

electrometer. Keithley mode 1 617 programmable

electrometer is a very sensitive and accurate instrument

to measure the charge, current, voltage and resistance

directly. There is 4 1/2 digit display which includes

4 1/2 digit mantissa plus a two digit alpha numeric

exponent and autoranging is included for all functions and

ranges.

Another important advantage of this electrometer is

its use as a constant voltage source. The voltage source

can be adjusted between -102.35 V and +102.4 V in 50 mV

increments, and has a maximum output of 2 mA.

In the present study, the resistance of the sample

was measured by constant voltage method[l,21. In this

mode, the measured resistance is automatically calculated

in accordance with the familiar formula R = V/I where R

is the resistance, V is the voltage and I is the current.

The simple circuit diagram for conductivity measurement is

given in figure 2.4.

Fig.2.3. Block diagram of the experimental set up for the measurement of d.c conductivity using Keithley Electrometer.

Fig. 2.4 Circuit diagram for the measurement of d.c conductivity.

2.4. Measurement of dielectric constant and a.c

conductivity

Dielectric constant and a.c conductivity measurements

were made with the help of a 4 1/2 digit display Hewlett-

Packard 4192A LF Impedance Analyser. This instrument can

measure 11 impedance parameters (R,X,L,C,D,Q, etc.). The

built-in frequency synthesiser can be set from 5 Hz to

13 MHz with a maximum resolution of 1 MHz. Test signal

level is variable from 5 mV to 1.1V with mV resolution.

Also, an internal d.c bias voltage source provides 2 35V

at 10 mV increments. Thus, the HP 4192A LF impedance

analyser can evaluate components and entire circuits at

near actual operating conditions. The frequency can be

varied in steps of 0.001 Hz (5 Hz to 10 KHz), 0.01 Hz

(10 KHz to 100 KHz), 0.1 Hz (100 KHz to 1 MHz), 1 Hz

(1 MHz to 13 MHz) with a frequency accuracy of - + 50 ppm.

2.5. Ultrasonic measurements

The widely used method for making velocity and

attenuation coefficient measurements in solids and liquids

is the pulse technique introduced by Pellam and Galt[3]

in 1946. A pulse of sinusoidal voltage is applied to a

piezo electric transducer that is in contact with the

sample. The transducer converts the electrical pulse into

a pulse of ultrasonic waves which is transmitted in to the

medium.

The pulse-echo overlap technique was used in the

present studies for the measurements of the ultrasonic

velocity in glass systems of different compositions.

Pulse-echo overlap (PEO) method

The pulse-echo overlap ( P E O ) method is a versatile

and highly accurate technique for measuring the velocity

of ultrasonic waves in solids. The absolute accuracy

arises from the fact that the method is capable of

overlapping accurately from any cycle of one echo to the

corresponding cycle of the next echo and thus avoid the

phase shift properly[4]. This accuracy exceeds the

accuracy of other methods like pulse superposition method

and long pulse technique.

Figure 2.5 represents the block diagram of the

arrangement for making the pulse-echo overlap measurements

with broad band pulses. The basic principle of the

measurements is as follows: Take two signals of interest

and make them overlap on the oscilloscope by driving

Fig. 2.5 Pulse-echo overlap system.

1 - Crt. JY-= 'v'

Verlicol

'n P'

T

btecied Echoes - .

r

r

v R. F kiodel 2470 knpedence

Automatic

Model 7700 Pulse

Modulator d

Receivcr 0

O s c i b s c o p

L

I

Slroba

1

7 0 0 Seriu R . F.

Plug - h

,- 0- Z.Arl# Inpt

1-

I Y

SF '

A

A.G.C , . w1

Attenuotlon Divided Recorder $nc

hlodel 1228 , y 0 d e Oivtde-

b o l Delol( ht eno o n e r o t a

Intans.

i

-

C W + 11p1

L

r ~ q u c r r y Counter

- Modek 1 1 0

"'I% ' Rero Iton fmqucncy Source

' C.W.

mpr) L

the x-axis with a frequency whose period is the travel

time between the signals of interest. Then one signal

appears on one sweep of the oscilloscope and the other

signal appears on the next sweep. The x-axis sweep

frequency is supplied by the c.w oscillator as shown in

figure 2.5. For jitter-free overlap the signals of

interest must be synchronized with the phase of the c.w

voltage. This condition is achieved by generating the

repetition rate of the input pulse from the phase of the

c.w voltage by a frequency divider. Division by a large

integer (1000) allows all the echoes from one pulse to be

attenuated before the next pulse is applied. The output

of the frequency divider is a trigger signal synchronous

with the phase of the c.w voltage. The trigger signal

triggers the main pulser, which pulses the transducer. A

diode limited circuit keeps the input pulse from

overloading the amplifier. The main pulser also triggers

two intensifying pulses which are applied to the cathode-

ray tube to intensify the trace. This feature is

necessary to distinguish the two signals of interest from

the rest of the echoes in the trace. In operation, the

oscilloscope intensity is tuned down so that only the two

signals of interest (intesified by the two strobe pulses)

are visible. Overlap is achieved by adjusting the c.w

frequency such that its period is equal to the time

between the signals of interest. The echoes under correct

overlapped condition are shown in figure 2.6. The c.w

frequency is counted using the frequency counter and the

travel time is the reciprocal of the frequency. Knowing

the thickness of the sample, the velocity of the

ultrasonic waves in the sample can be calculated.

In the present study the ultrasonic velocities in the

glass samples were determined using a Matec ultrasonic

velocity system consisting of a high resolution fequency

source (Matec Model 1101, decade divider and dual delay

generators (Matec Model 122B), a pulse modulator and

receiver (Matec Model 7700) and a RF plug-in (Matec Model

755) having the frequency range 1 MHz to 20 MHz. The

frequency measurements were carried out using a frequency

counter (Aplab 1112) and the echo overlap was made with

the help of an oscilloscope (PHILIPS PM 3206). For

longitudinal and transverse velocity measurements

respectively X and Y cut quartz transducers of frequency

3 MHz were used. The transducers were bonded to the glass

samples using salol as the bonding material. The

overlapped broad band echoes from the pulse-echo overlap

system are as shown in figure 2.6.

Fig. 2.6 Overlapped broadband echoes from the pulse echo

overlap system.

2.6 Laser Raman spectroscopy

Among the various techniques used for understanding

the structure of glasses, laser Raman spectroscopy has

attracted much importance[5,6]. Generally, it is

difficult to give a complete theoretical interpretation of

the Raman spectra of glasses. However, it is feasible to

derive information on the presence of various structural

groups in glassy materials by comparison of their laser

Raman spctra with those of the corresponding crystalline

compounds. Raman spectra of crystalline materials are

used as finger prints for the identification of the

specific groups in glasses.

In the present study a DILOR 2 2 4 laser Raman

spectrometer was used for recording the spectra of the

glass samples.

References

1. Martin L., Methods of Experimental Physics, Vo1.6 Part B, (Solid State Physics) Academic Press (1959).

2. Tallan N.M., "Electrical Conductivity in Ceramics and Glass", Part A , Ed. Tallan N.M., Marcel Dekker. Inc. N.Y. (1974).

3. Pellam J.L. and Gatt J.K., J. Chem. Phys. 14, 608 (1946).

4. Papadakis E.P., Physical Acoustics: Principles and Methods, Ed. Mason W.P. and Thurston R.N., Vo1.12, Academic Press, N.Y. (1976).

5. Konijnendijk W.L. and Stevels J.M., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 18, 307 (1975).

6. Meera B.N. and Ramakrishna J., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 159, 1 (1993).

CHAPTER 3

D. C. CONDUCTIVITY STUDIES ON Ca0-B2@AI2O3-Na20

AND Ca0-B2O3Al2O3-Fe203 GLASS SYSTEMS

CHAPTER 3

D.C. CONDUCTIVITY STUDIES ON Ca0-B203-A1203-Na20 AND

CaO-B 0 -A1 0 -Fe203 GLASS SYSTEMS 2 3 2 3

3.1. Introduction

The ternary glass system CaO-B 0 -A1203 generally 2 3

known as cabal glasses is characterized by a very high

electrical resistance due to the lack of mobile charge

carriers. The incorporation of an alkali oxide like Na20

or a transition metal oxide like Fe 0 in cabal glass is 2 3

expected to generate either mobile ions or electrons,

respectively, which may enhance the conductivity of the

glass system. This chapter is a detailed account of the

study of d.c conductivity of the quarternary glass systems

Ca0-B203-A1 0 -Na20 and CaO-B 0 -A1203-Fe 0 2 3 2 3 2 3'

This

chapter is divided to 3 parts. Part I gives a brief

review of the d.c conductivity studies on oxide glasses

containing alkali oxides and those containing transition

metal oxides. Part I1 of this chapter deals with the

investigations carried out on the d.c conductivity of the

quarternary glass system Ca0-B203-A1 0 -Na20. 2 3

Part I11 consists of the studies carried out on d.c

conductivity of the glass system Ca0-B203-A1 0 -Fe203. 2 3

PART I

REVIEW OF D.C CONDUCTIVITY STUDIES ON OXIDE GLASSES

CONTAINING ALKALI/TRANSITION-METAL OXIDES

3.2. Introduction

The study of electrical properties of glasses has

gained much interest now-a-days due to the increasing

applications in engineering and technological fields.

Glasses have acknowledged advantages over crystalline

electrolytes including physical isotropy, the absence of

grain boundaries, continuously varying composition and

good workability. With regard to electrical conductivity

in glasses, generally, two kinds of mechanism are

observed. (i) ionic conduction and (ii) polaronic or

electronic conduction. In glasses containing alkali

oxides, like Na20, K20 and Cs20 conduction is due to the

motion of alkali ions which are more mobile than other

ions. In glasses containing transition-metal oxides like

Fe203 or V 0 the conduction is through the hopping of 2 5'

electrons and is usually referred to as polaronic

conduction.

3.3. D.C conductivity studies on oxide glasses containing

alkali oxides - a review

Recently there has been renewed interest in the

properties of vitreous ionic conductors[l-41. Ionic

conduction in glasses has been discussed by many

scientists[5-81. It was known for many years that glasses

containing alkali ions are essentially solid cationic

electrolytes, the current being carried by the relatively

mobile alkali ions. The mobility of these ions is much

larger than that of the network-forming ions at all

temperatures. When the current is carried completely by

the alkali ions, their transference number is unity, and

the conduction characteristics are determined by the

concentration and mobility of the alkali ions.

In glasses containing alkali oxides, the direct

current electrical conductivity can be understood in terms

of a thermally activated process which involves ionic

defects similar to the "Frenkel Defects" found in

crystalline substances. For the calculation of activation

energy for ionic conduction the most acceptable and widely

used theory is the theory proposed by Anderson and

Stuart[91. This theory with certain modifications was

used by Hakim and Uhlmann[lO] in the study of electrical

conductivity of glasses containing alkali oxides. They

measured the activation energy values and it was found

that the values were in good agreement with the values

calculated from the Anderson and Stuart's theory. Later

this theory was extended to the alkali containing borate,

silicate, phosphate and sulphate glasses exhibiting "mixed

cation effect". Eventhough the theory proposed by

Anderson and Stuart does not specifically take into

account the random structure of the glasses and is based

on certain approximations, the theory contains the

essential features of the ionic conduction in glasses. It

has been seen that this is the most suited way to explain

and discuss the ionic conduction in glasses.

As the temperature is increased, the electrical

conductivity of a glass system rapidly increases and over

a considerable temperature range the conductivity can be

expressed by the Arrhenius type equation

G = 6, exp (-E/KT) ... (3.1) where E is the activation energy for conductivity, 6 is

the d.c electrical conductivity, T o is the pre-

exponential factor and T is the absolute temperature.

The logarithmic version of this expression is usually

referred to as Rasch-Hinrichsen relation[ll].

log y = A + B/T

where A and B are constants.

The activation energy and the electrical conductivity

show a discontinuity at the transformation range

corresponding to the freezing of the glass structure at

this temperature. In this connection it is of interest to

note that the electrical conductivity of a quenched glass

(an open network structure) is larger than that of an

annealed glass (dense - network structure). In the

molten range, the conductivities of glasses are sometimes

shown to vary with temperature as

6 = 6, exp (-AT + B T ~ + .... ) ... ( 3 . 3 )

The overriding effect of composition on the

conductivity of glasses is related to the type and amount

of modifier ion present, particularly alkali ion.

Electrical conductivity measurements in alkali silicate,

alkali borate and alkali germanate glasses have been

extensively carried out. Generally, in alkali silicates,

a rapid increase in the conductivity is observed on

addition of alkali oxide to vitreous silica upto

20-30 mol% and at higher concentrations, the conductivity

lie in the range 10 -14 -1 -1 to ohm cm (at 2 5 0 ~ ~ ) as

the alkali concentration increases from 0 to 30 mol%.

For the same sodium ion concentration the conductivity is

found to decrease when divalent earth oxides like CaO,

MgO, BaO or PbO replace a part of the B 0 or SiO to form 2 3 2

ternary systems[7,12,14]. This results from the fact that

the larger modifier ions plug up the migration paths

through the lattice. By virtue of their larger size and

higher charge, these ions are not themselves so easily

mobile. The results of a systematic investigation of this

effect in Na20-RO-Si02 glasses containing 20 mol% Na20

and 20 mol% RO (where RO is divalent earth oxide)

indicate that the effectiveness of an oxide in increasing

the resistivity increases smoothly as the radius of the

divalent metal ion increases.

The alkali borate glasses are classified into two

groups based on the conductivity measurements. Group I

consists of alkali borate glasses containing potassium,

rubidium and cesium and Group I1 consists of glass

containing sodium and lithium. A linear increase in

conductivity was observed with the increase of alkali

oxide content from 8% to 25% for the glasses belonging to

Group I but for the glasses belonging to Group 11, the

linear increase of conductivity starts at a concentration

of 2 mol% of alkali oxide. As in the case of silicate

glasses, borate glasses containing potassium have lower

conductivity than sodium and lithium borate glasses.

Mazurin[l5] has reviewed conductivity studies in alkali

silicate, borate and alkali germanate glasses reported

till 1965.

Investigations on the dependence of conductivity on

composition in the case of binary silicate glasses have

been reported by different workers - Seddon et a1.[16] in

Na 0-SiO Kuznetsov and Meljnikova[l?] in Na 0-SiO K O- 2 2 ' 2 2 ' 2

Si02 and Kuznetsov[l8] in Li 0-SiO systems. The most 2 2

significant feature of Kuznetsor's result is the change of

slope which occurs at the composition of about 33 mol%.

This change becomes more pronounced when the temperature

is further increased. A similar result was observed in

sodium silicate also at 33 mol%, whereas in potassium

silicate the change in the slope was observed at about

22 mol%. This behaviour has been discussed by Stevels[l9]

and it is found that the composition 33 mol% of Ma20

corresponds to the point at which there is, on an average,

one non-bridging oxygen per silicon tetrahedron. Because

of this a significant structural change takes place which

is reflected in the resistivity-composition curve.

The dependence of activation energy on the chemical

composition of alkali silicate glasses R20-Si02 where

R = Na, K or Cs were studied by Hakim et a1.[201. The

activation energy values were found to be decreasing with

the increase of the alkali oxide content in the glass

system. It was also observed that the conductivity

increases with the increase of the concentration of alkali

content and temperature. The experimental results were

explained and discussed on the basis of the model proposed

by Anderson and Stuart with some slight modifications in

the assumption regarding the jump distance. They assumed

that the jump distance is the average interionic

separation in the glass, or it has a constant small value

varying only slightly with composition. The activation

energy calculated with this assumption was found to be in

good agreement with the experiments.

Temperature dependence of conductivity of R20-B 0 2 3

glass system (R-alkali metal) were studied by

Han et a1.[21]. and Matusita et a1.[22]. They found that

the conductivity follows the Arrhenius type equation.

Conductivity was found to increase with the increase in

the alkali concentration. The value of activation energy

of this glass system increased initially (upto 8 mol%) and

then decreased smoothly with further increase of the

alkali oxide. The latter behaviour was explained by the

model proposed by Anderson and Stuart.

Temperature dependence of conductivity of lithium

based borate, silicate and phosphate glasses have been

reported by several workers[14,23,25]. They observed that

conductivity increases with the increase in lithium

content in the glass system. The values of conductivity

-1 -1 at 550K are of the order of 10-~0hm cm and activation

energy values are of the order 0.6 eV and hence such

glasses are usually referred to as fast ionic conductors.

Konijnendijk[26] in 1975 investigated temperature

dependence of electrical conductivity of lithium, sodium

or potassiun borosilicate glasses. He observed a

dependence of activation energy and conductivity on the

concentration of the alkali oxide content. The

temperature dependence of conductivity was found to obey

the Arrhenius type equation and the value of activation

energy was found to obey with increase in the alkali

content.

Reports on electrical conductivity studies on sodium

borosilicate and lithium borosilicate glass system made by

Otto[27] also establishes the temperature dependence of

electrical conductivity. The conductivity was found to

obey the Arrhenius type equation6= exp (+/KT).

Otto[27] observed that conductivity increases with the

concentration of the alkali oxide content. For a given

mol% of the alkali oxide, the activation energy was found

to be decreasing linearly with increasing Si02 content.

Studies on d.c. conductivity of borate glass systems of

Na20-B 0 and PbO-B203 containing metallic granules were 2 3

reported by Chakraborthy et a1.[28] in 1980. The

conductivity measurements were made in the temperature

range 30 to 2 0 0 ~ ~ . They reported that conduction below

1 2 0 ~ ~ arises on account of electron tunneling between two

metallic particles, whereas at high temperatures, above

120°c the conduction is controlled by ionic transport.

Conductivity and activation energy measurements on

lithium containing borate glasses (Li20-B 0 ) had been 2 3

reported by Abu Sekkina[23]. In this study the activation

energy is found to remain constant upto about 12 molB of

Li 0 and beyond 12 mol% of Li20 the activation energy 2

falls down rapidly. Abu Sekkina[23] has explained the

results interms of "Boron anomaly" involving the

conversion of three coordinated borons with four

coordinated borons with the concentration of lithium

oxide upto about 12 rnol%. Further addition of Li20

to the glass system leads to reconversion of four

coordinated borons to three coordinated borons.

Anavekar et a1.[29] have reported the d.c. electrical

conductivity of B ~ ~ ~ - Z ~ O - N ~ 0 glass system as a function 2

of temperature. The results indicate that the activation

+ . energy of Na Ions is independent of ZnO concentration.

The activation energy values corresponding to high and low

temperatures are reported to be markedly different. The

results have been discussed on the basis of cluster model

of glasses[30].

Soppe et a1.[31] have reported ionic conductivity

studies in (B203) 1-x-y -(Li20)-(LiC1 glasses. 2 Y

They

observed that activation energy decreases with the

increase of Li20 content. They suggested that the

addition of LiC12 to the glass system probably does not

influence the glass structure, but its presence

drastically increase the ionic conductivity which cannot

be accounted for the increased number of charge carriers

only. They also observed that the activation energy

associated with the conductivity of ~ i + ions is reduced

by the pressure of ~ 1 - I ions.

Dependence of alkali oxide content on the d.c.

conductivity of Na 0-CaO-SiO glasses was studied by 2 2

Catchiny[32]. These studies were intended to establish

the correlation between the conductivity of glasses and

the structural units present in the glass. Martin[33]

reported the dependence of d.c. conductivity on the

concentration of Na 0 upto 6 mol% in B 0 -A1 0 -Na 0 glass 2 2 3 2 3 2

system. He observed a conductivity maximum and an

activation energy minimum for a particular concentration

A1 0 and CaO. Effect of addition of LiNbO on Of B2°3' 2 3 3

the conductivity of Li 0-B 0 glass system was reported by 2 2 3

Rokade et a1.[34] in the temperature range 400 to 714 K.

The maximum enhancement in conductivity is by two orders

of magnitude due to incorporation of 20 mol% LiNb03.

Experimental results were discussed on the basis of

concentration and mobility of ~ i + ions.

Sudhakar Rao et a1.[35] reported the d.c conductivity

and activation energy of Na 0 containing zinc phosphate 2

glasses over a temperature range 300-400 K. The electrical

properties of Li20-B 0 doped with 2 3 A1203 have been

reported by Kurek et a1.[36] in 1989. They observed an

increase in activation energy and a decrease in

conductivity with the doping of A1203. This behaviour may

be due to the change in the glass structure causing

changes not only in migration entropy but also in other

quantities determining 6,. They concluded that A1203

partially dissolved in the glass and caused high

activation energy and low conductivity.

Electrical conductivity studies on multicomponent

lithium fluoroborate glasses have been reported by

Bohem et a1.[37]. Below the normal glass transition

temperature, Bohem et a1.[37] have observed an isothermal

shift in the conductivity of the glass system. They also

noted a dependence of conductivity on the temperature of

annealing of the glass. The results were discussed on the

basis of the secondary relaxation process as in the case

of polymer glasses. The electrical conductivity of Li20-

BaO-Si02 and Na20-Mg0-5i02 glasses were measured at

temperatures ranging from room temperature to 4 5 0 ~ ~ by

Matusita et a1.[381. They also measured the transport

+ . numbers for Na Lon in the glass system. It was found

that the alkali ion plays a significant role in enhancing

the conductivity and the conductivity decreased markedly

as the alkali oxide was substituted by an alkaline earth

oxide.

Glasses containing A1 0 3, Ga203, Bi203 and Li20 have

been prepared and their conductivity measurements have

been reported by Glass et a1.[39]. They observed that

these glasses exhibit reasonably high ionic conductivity

and low electronic conductivity for Li20 concentrations

exceeding 50 mol%. The conductivity increases rapidly

with increasing Li20 concentration but does not differ

greatly from system to system despite the large difference

in the ionic radii of the trivalent cations, ~ l ~ + , Ga 3+

3 + and Bi . A simple model for this behaviour was also

discussed.

3.4. D.C conductivity studies on oxide glasses containing

transition-metal oxide - a review

Inorganic oxide glasses containing transition-metal

oxides like Fe203, V205, etc. are known to be electronic

semiconductors and the first report on semiconducting

properties of glasses appeared in the year 1954[40].

Since then most studies have been on systems based on

glasses of phosphates, although semiconducting oxide

glasses based on other glass formers like silicates,

borates, etc. were made. Early works on semiconducting

transition metal oxide containing inorganic oxide glasses

have been reviewed by Mackenzie[ll]. More recent

reviewers upto 1978 have treated semiconducting oxide

glasses as a part of the general problem of electrical

properties of non-crystalline materials or were concerned

with only the phosphates[45,46]. In 1982, Murawski[46]

reviewed the studies on the electrical properties of

silicate, borate, phosphate and telluride glasses

containing the transition-metal oxide, Fe20g.

Wong et a1.[47] have pointed out that iron in borate

and silicate glasses can be either tetrahedral or

octahedral coordinated. They have also observed that the

four-fold coordinated trivalent iron has significant

influence on the electrical conduction. Kuznetzove and

Teshomski[48] have suggested that in iron silicate

glasses, the electron transport is only through octahedral

3 + coordinated Fe . The Fe04 tetrahedra has atleast one

negative charge which hinders the approach of the

electron. The glass must contain a weakly bonded oxygen

atom to allow iron to acquire four-fold coordination. The

number of weakly bonded oxygen atoms increase with

decrease of the field of modifier ions. Magnetic

susceptibility and Mossbauer spectroscopy[49] studies have

shown that fraction of Fe ions at octohedral sites

increase with increase in the ionic potential of the

cation modifier. Therefore, the conductivity is found to

depend upon the type of the modifier atom present in the

glass.

Conductivity of CaO-B 0 -Fe203 glass system 2 3

containing varying concentrations of Fe 0 from 10 to 2 3

23 mol% have been studied over a temperature range from

200 to 700 K by Gawish and Saleh[50]. They observed that

conductivity increases and activation energy decreases

with the concentration of Fe 0 as well as with 2 3

temperature upto 20 mol% Fe203. In glasses containing

more than 20 mol% Fe 0 the conductivity showed large and 2 3'

rapid decrease. This abrupt change in the electrical

conductivity and activation energy has been attributed to

partially crystalline nature of glasses containing more

than 20 mol% of Fe203. Conductivity studies on iron oxide

containing barium borate[51] and calcium silicate[52]

glasses have been reported and the results are similar to

those of CaO-B203-Fe 0 glasses. Anderson and Mc Crone[53] 2 3

have reported studies on lead silicate glasses containing

Fe203. They suggested that the spatial positions of the

Fe ions are not random in the glass for which the Fe203

concentration is more than 10 mol%. Most of the Fe ions

are situated in some kind of clusters containing various

numbers of Fe ions. Charge transport takes place along

the chains of clusters and it is possible that in the case

of small amounts of Fe 0 direct current conductive paths 2 3'

do not connect all the clusters. In such a case, change

of conductivity with concentration of Fe ions should be

very high as has been observed in iron containing borate

and silicate glasses[4l].

The Mossbauer spectroscopic studies in iron

containing phosphate glasses[54,55,56] indicate octahedral

2+ . coordination for ~ e ~ + and Fe lons. The detailed study

of Taragin et a1.1571 confirmed the octahedral

coordination of Fe ions in phosphate glasses. Taragin et

al. have also found that Debye temperatures for Fe 2+ and

Fe 3+ are different. This fact indicates a difference in

the way the ions are incorporated in the glass structure.

Conductivity studies on V 0 -B 0 glass system have 2 5 2 3

been reported by Sharma et a1.[58]. They observed a high

temperature conduction phenomenon for this glass system

and concluded that this may be due to the adiabatic

hopping. They also observed that conductivity increases

with the V205 concentration.

Matusita et a1.[59], Yun et a1.[60] and Catching[61]

have reported the electrical conductivity of lead

silicate, lead phosphate and lead borate glasses

containing the transition-metal iron. These glasses

exhibit interesting results because lead is basically

amphoteric in nature and in these glasses lead is

considered as a part of the network. The investigators

have observed an appreciable increase in conductivity in

the borate glass system when the ratio PbO/B203 is

increased.

The electrical resistivity of iron containing lead

borate glasses was measured over a temperature range 300-

700 K by Ardelean[62]. He observed that resistivity

increases with the iron content and the resistivity is a

2 + function of Fe /Fetotal ratio. The glass samples with

Fe203 concentration greater than 15 molt show two

activation energies for conduction. This change in the

activation energy may be attributed to the charge transfer

between the iron ions in different positions at higher

temperatures. The experimental results on conductivity

was discussed on the basis of the polaronic hopping model.

In iron containing borate and silicate glasses, glass

formation regions are much narrower than in phosphate

systems, generally less than 20 mol% Fe203[63-651. The

maximum concentration of Fe203 depends on the kind of

network modifiers and on the melting conditions. The

structural study of iron-silicate and iron borate glasses

has showed that Fe ions are not randomly distributed and

some magnetic inhomogenities exist in these glasses. The

model of Anderson and Mc Crone1531 proposes that a great

majority of Fe ions are situated in relatively well-

ordered clusters containing various number of Fe ions.

Most of the Fe ions exist in pairs or groups of three and

are antiferromagnetically coupled within these groups.

within each structure the nearest neighbour inter-ion

distance and relative orientations are assumed to be very

similar to those in the crystalline oxides (Fe 0 2 3' Fe304'

FeO). The average cluster sizes depend on the iron

concentration and heat treatment.

Electrical studies on BaO-B203 glasses containing

Fe203, '2'5 or CuO have been reported by

Bandyopadhyaya et a1.[66]. They observed that electrical

resistivity and activation energy values decrease with the

increase of transition-metal oxide concentration. They

also observed that the values of resistivity and

activation energy of glasses containing mixed transition

metal oxides are less than that of glasses containing

single transition metal-oxide.

The electrical conductivity of iron containing barium

borate glass system have been studied as a function of

heat treatment and r-ray irradiation by Sanad et a1.[67].

Electrical conductivity of the untreated glass samples

increases with the increase of Fe203 upto 5 mol%, then

decreases at 7.5 mol% and then again increases with

increase in concentrations. They have concluded that this

behaviour may be due to the entrance of iron into the

glass network positions at low Fe 0 concentration and at 2 3

higher concentration it acts like a network modifier so

that the conduction is electronic and ionic. The ionic

behaviour may be due to the ~ a ~ + ions.

Sanad et a1.[67] have observed that the activation

energy increases with increase in the concentration of

Fe203. This behaviour is opposite to the general

observation that the activation energy decreases with the

increase in the concentration of the transition metal

oxide (Fe203) in glasses containing transition-metal

oxide. The peculiar behaviour of iron containing barium

borate glasses may be due to the change in coordination of

boron from B03 to B04 with increase in concentration of

Fe203. Sanad et a1.[67] observed partial crystallization

to occur in these glasses when the glass samples were heat

treated. The values for activation energy and resistivity

of the heat-treated samples were found to be less than

those of the untreated samples.

Bansal et a1.[681 have reported a detailed study of

electrical resistivity of barium borate glasses containing

the transition metal oxide, V205. They observed that

resistivity and activation energy values increase with the

concentration of BaO concentration whereas B2°3 has

negligible effect on the resistivity and activation energy

values. Temperature dependence of resistivity on V205-

BaO-K 0-ZnO glass system was reported by Kawamoto et 2

a1.[69] for various concentration of V 0 from 30 to 70 2 5

mol%. They observed that over the temperature range 300-

500 K, change in resistivity is linear and that the

magnitude of the resistivity is hardly affected by the

type of modifier oxide and its concentration. The values

of activation energy and the resistivity were found to be

markedly dependent on the redox ratio of vanadium and the

total vanadium present. They noticed that the presence of

modifiers in the glass system has very little influence on

the hopping process and have suggested that the changes in

the electrical properties may be due to the structural

changes of vanadium in these glasses.

PART I1

STUDY OF D.C. CONDUCTIVITY IN Ca0-B203-A1203-Na20

GLASS SYSTEM

3.5. Introduction

The glass system Ca0-B203-A1 0 usually known as 2 3

cabal glass is generally a poor conductor of electricity.

+ The incorporation of mobile carriers like Na in this

glass system will enhance the conductivity. The study of

the influence of ~ a + ions on the conductivity of the glass

system Ca0-B203-A1 0 -Na 0 was taken up in the present 2 3 2

2 + investigation. The divalent Ca ions and the trivalent

~1 3+ + ions present in the glass may block the Na ion in

its conduction process. Hence to make the present study

systematic and complete, the variation of the electrical

conductivity of the glasses with variation in the mole

percentage of Na20, A1203 and CaO have been investigated

in detail. The variation of conductivity of the glass

system has been studied systematically over a temperature

range from 300 to 523 K.

3.6. Experimental details

3.6.1. Glass composition

Three series of glass system CaO-B 0 -A1 0 -Na 0 with 2 3 2 3 2

the following general formulae were prepared for the

present studies:

Series (i) 10caO-(75-x)B 0 -15A1 0 -xNa20; 2 3 2 3

x = 15r18r21r24r27.

Series (ii) 10Ca0-(75-y)~~O~-yAl 0 -15Na20; 2 3

y = 5,10,15,20

Series (iii) zCaO-(70-z)B 0 -15Al 0 -15Na 0; 2 3 2 3 2

Five glass samples of the first series containing

varying concentrations of Na20 from 15 to 27 mole

percentage (mol?.) and constant concentration of A1203 and

CaO as listed in table 3.1 were prepared. Similarly the

other series of glass samples were prepared either with

varying concentration of CaO (5 to 20 mol%) and constant

concentrations of Na20 and A1203 (table 3.2) or with

varying the concentration of A1 0 (5 to 20 mol%) and with 2 3

constant concentrations of Na20 and CaO (table 3.3).

Table 3.1. Chemical composition of glass samples.

Composition (mol%) Sample No. ..........................................

CaO

Table 3.2. Chemical composition of glass samples.

Composition (mol % ) Sample No. .........................................

CaO B2°3 A1203 Na20

--

Table 3.3. Chemical composition of glass samples.

Composition (mol % ) Sample No. ..........................................

CaO B2°3 A1203 Na20

3.6.2. Preparation of glass samples

Reagent grade orthoboric acid (H3B03), aluminium

oxide (A1203), sodium carbonate (Na2C03) and calcium

carbonate (CaC03) were used for the preparation of the

glass samples. Appropriate mole percentages (table 3.1,

3.2 and 3.3) of these chemicals were mixed and thoroughly

ground in a mortar to get a homogeneous mixture. The

mixed charge was then taken in a crucible and was placed

in a horizontal muffle furnace. The temperature of the

muffle furnace was increased in steps of 50°c and the

mixture was sintered at about 673 K to eliminate water

from orthoboric acid and carbon dioxide from sodium

carbonate as well as from calcium carbonate. The

temperature of the muffle furnace was increased in steps

until the mixture melted at about 1223 K and the melt was

kept at that temperature for another two hours to ensure

its homogeneity. The melt was then quenched quickly by

the method of splat-quenching using the quenching device

mentioned in Section 2.2 of Chapter 2. Circular brass

discs of 2 mm thickness and having hole of diameter 15 mm

at the centre was used to get the glass samples of uniform

shape. The melt solidifies quickly producing a circular

disc of transparent glass sample. The samples were found

to be non-hygroscopic. Since, the cooling of the

homogeneous melt was a rapid one, internal stresses may

develop during solidification of the liquid phase to the

glassy phase. In order to avoid these internals

mechanical stresses, the glass samples prepared were

annealed at about 675 K, which is below the glass

transition temperature (Tg), for about four hours and were

cooled to room temperature gradually.

The amorphous nature of the prepared glass samples

was confirmed by X-ray diffraction. Figure 3.1 shows the

X-ray diffraction chart of a typical glass sample.

After annealing, both surfaces of the samples were

first polished with fine silicon carbide powder and then

with fine grade emery paper. Glass samples of thickness

about 1.5mm and diameter lmm with parallel plane surfaces

were thus obtained. In order to get a reliable data on

electrical conductivity, there must be good electrical

contacts between the electrodes and the experimental glass

sample. To achieve this, a thin circular film of silver

was vapour deposited on both sides of the sample by vacuum

deposition technique.

3.6.3. Measurement of d.c conductivity in CaO-B 0 -A1 0 - 2 3 2 3

Na 0 glass system 2

For the measurement of the direct current electrical

conductivity of the prepared glass samples, two-probe

method which follows the direct application of Ohm's law

was used. The experimental glass sample was introduced

between the two chromium-plated copper electrodes of the

stainless steel conductivity cell described in Section 2.3

of Chapter 2. Due to the conductive coating of silver on

the surfaces of the conductivity cell, good electrical

contact between the sample and the electrodes was

established.

The experimental glass sample could be heated to

different fixed temperatures by adjusting the current

through the heater coil of the conductivity cell. To

measure the resistance of the sample at any temperature, a

constant voltage of 50 V was applied across the sample

from the constant voltage source of a Keithley (model No.

617) electrometer. (The electric field was applied only

for a short duration of about a few seconds to avoid the

effects of polarisation). The resitance ( R ) of the sample

was measured using the Keithley electrometer in the V/I

mode as described in Section 2.3 of Chapter 2. The

resistivity ( P ) of the sample was calculated using the

formula p = RA/1, where A is the area of one of the

electrodes and 1 the thickness of the glass sample. The

c reciprocal of the resistivity gives the condu,tivity. The

conductivity of samples of different composition were

determined for different temperatures (which were

0 maintained constant within + 0.1 C) and are tabulated in - tables 3.4 to 3.6.

3.7. Results and discussion

The d.c electrical conductivity (table 3.4 to 3.6)

of three series, of quarternary glass system CaO-B 0 - 2 3

A1 0 -Na20 had been investigated systematically over a 2 3

temperature range from about 300 K to 525 K. The plots of

logarithm of conductivity (ln6) against reciprocal of

temperature (1000/T) for all glass samples were found to

be straightlines with positive slopes (figure 3.2 to 3.4)

satisfying the Arrhenius type equation:

b = bo exp ( -Ea/KT) ..... (3.1)

Where 6 , the d.c electrical conductivity, fGt the pre-

exponential factor, Ea, the activation energy for

conduction, k, the Boltzmann's constant and T, the

temperature.

Table 3.4 Variation of d.c. conductivity with temperature Of CaO-B 0 -A1 0 -Na 0 glass system for different $oicen$ratio?is of Na 0

2

.e 3.5 Variation of d.c. conductivity w i t h temperature of CaO-B 0 - A 1 0 -Na 0 glass system for dif f erent2c&ce&t$ati6ns of CaO

Temperature l n C ....................................... 100P/T - S A l S A 2 S A 3 S A 4

K

Table 3 . 6 Variation of d.c. conductivity with temperature of CaO-B 0 - A 1 0 -Na 0 glass system for different2canceAt2ati8ns of A 1 0

2 3

Temperature l n 6

10001 T K ' Figure 3.2

V a r i a t i o n o f d . c c o n d u c t i v i t y w i t h t e m p e r a t u r e o f CaO-B 0 -A1 0 -Na 0 glass s y s t e m f o r d i f f e r e n t c6ni!ent?!a?iong of NaZO.

l O O O / T K-' Figure 3.3

Variation of d.c conductivity with temperature of CaO-B 0 - A 1 0 -Na 0 glass system for different cgnJent$a?iong of CaO.

1000 /T K 1 Figure 3.4

Variation of d.c conductivity with

temperature of CaO-A 0 -A1 0 -Na 0 glass system for different cgn$ent?agiong of A l 2 O 3 .

From the experimental results given in table 3.4 to

3.6 and from figure 3.2, it is observed that d.c

conductivity of glass samples containing constant

concentration of A1203 and CaO increases with the

concentration of Na 0. It is also observed that the slope 2

of l n 6 Vs 1000/T graph decreases with the increase of the

concentration of Na20, showing a decrease in the

activation energy. It has been reported that in glases

containing mixed oxides (including an alkali oxide), the

alkali ions will be more mobile in an electric field

compared to other divalent and trivalent ions because of

the smaller ionic radius as well as the lower activation

energy for the alkali ions[10,18,29,70,71]. The alkali

ions ( ~ a + ions) are usually weakly bound to the oxygen

atoms and as the temperature is increased more ~ a + ions

will be rendered free to drift under the applied electric

field resulting in an enhanced conductivity. In addition,

at a given temperature, conductivity should increase with

increase in mole percentage of Na 0 and this also will 2

lead to an increase in the number of mobile charge

carriers. The experimental results are in good agreement

with reported results of variation of conductivity with

temperature and concentration of alkali oxides in similar

inorganic glass systems[18,21,22]. Since the

concentration of CaO and A1203 are kept constant in the

first series of glasses, the number of relatively immobile

Ca 2 + and ~ 1 ~ ' ions remains almost same in this series of

glass system. Therefore, their contribution in enhancing

the conductivity of the glass system should be negligible

and the observed increase in conductivity of the glass

system should be wholly due to the alkali ions ( ~ a + ions).

The present study shows that the insulator-like cabal

glass system (Ca0-B203-A1203) can be made conducting to a

+ reasonable extent by incorporating Na ions and the

increase in conductivity can be controlled by controlling

the concentration of Na 0 in the glass system. This point 2

is important in view of the fact that, inspite of the

ability of divalent and trivalent ions, in blocking the

+ + . movement of monovalent ions (Na ions), the Na Ions are

not completely blocked even by a large concentration of

CaO and A1203, and appreciable conductivity is observed in

the present system.

Activation energy values are calculataed from the

slope of i n 6 Vs 1000/T plot for each glass system i

containing varying concentration of Na20 (figure 3.2)

studied. As can be seen from the figure 3.5, activation

energy decreases with the increase of Na 0 concentration 2

for the first series of glass system. The observed

experimental results of activation energy can be discussed

with the Anderson and Stuart Model[9]. This model gives a

Variation of activation energy with concentration of

Na 0 in CaO-B 0 -A1 0 -Na 0 glass system 2 2 3 2 3 2

Sample No. Activation energy (eV)

! 1 0 . 1 8 ~ - i 1

12 15 18 2 1 24 27 30

Concentration of Na,O (mol %)

Figure 3 .5

Variation of activation energy with the concentration of Na20.

definition for activation energy as the sum of

electrostatic energy and strain energy needed to move the

alkali ions ( ~ a + ions in the present case) from one site

to another. When the alkali concentration is increased

the electrostatic energy decreases because of the decrease

in the alkali-alkali distance, whereas the strain energy

increases, and the three coordinated boron changes to a

four coordinated one as a result of which the network

becomes more compact. This leads to a decrease in

activation energy. Similar types of results (decrease in

activation energy with the increase of alkali oxide

concentration) has been observed in various glass

system[10,14,26,72].

Table 3.5 and figure 3.3 show the variation of d.c

electrical conductivity with temperature ranging from 300

to 525 K for samples of Ca0-B203-A1 0 -Na20 glass system 2 3

of the second series (table 3.2) containing varying

concentration of CaO and constant concentration Na 0 and 2

A1203. It is obvious from the figure 3.3 that the

conductivity increases with temperature. This is as

expected since the current carriers in this series of

glass system are also alkali ions ( ~ a + ions) and hence the

conductivity should obey the Arrhenius type equation

6 = Co exp (-Ea/k.T). It s also evident from the

figure 3.3 that the conductivity decreases when the

concentration of CaO is increased. Since the glass system

studied in the present work contains an alkali oxide

(Na20), the conductivity should be mainly due to the

+ . monovalent alkali ions (Na Ions). In this system, the

presence of alkaline earth divalent ions (ca2+ ions) block

the conduction path of the highly mobile ~ a + ions and the

C a 2 + ions apparently fit into the voids in the network.

2+ . The covalent character of the Ca lons causes the metal

ions to bond more strongly to the oxygen of the network

inhibiting mobility of these ions and resulting in a

decrease in the electrical conductivity. When the

concentration of CaO content in the glass system is

increased, the blocking action by the ca2+ ions will be

more pronounced and as a result conductivity should

decrease. Similar results have been reported for alkali

oxide glass containing alkaline-earth oxides[7,14,24].

Since the concentration of Na 0 and A1 0 remains constant 2 2 3

throughout this series of glass system (table 3.2), their

effect on the change in conductivity remains almost the

same.

Values of conductivity measured for the third series

(Table 3.3) of glass system containing varying

concentrations of A1203, and constant concentration of

Na20 and CaO over a temperature range 300-525 K are listed

in table 3.6. Figure 3.4 shows the variation of

In CT with 1000/T of the glass system of the third series.

The solid lines are the best fit lines which follow

Arrhenius type equation. As can be seen from the

figure 3.5, the conductivity increases as the temperature

is increased. Such a variation can be understood by

noting that alkali ions (~a' ions) are the main charge

carriers in this series of glass system. From

figure 3.4 it is also observed that the conductivity

decreases with the increase in the concentration of A1203.

The decrease in conductivity may be due to the blocking

action of ~1~'ions. According to Huang etcd . [72] the

conductivity of a glass system decreases when B203 is

replaced by A1203, which is explained as due to smaller

electronegativity. The decrease in conductivity of this

series of glass system may also be attributed to the

increased polarisation of ~ 1 ~ ' ions. (Polarization effet

3 + is more for ~ 1 ~ ' ions than for B ions). It appears to

be a universal law that the conductivity of glasses

containing the same alkali oxide content increases with

the increase of the electronegtivity and polarization of

cations taking part in the network of the glass

structure[73]. Since the concentration of CaO is kept

constant, the blocking action by Ca " ions is almost

invarient.

3.8. Conclusion

A systematic study of d.c electrical conductivity of

the Na20 containing cabal glass system had been studied

over a wide range of composition and for a temperature

range from 300 to 523 K. The conductivity of the glass

system had been found to depend on the concentrations of

Na20, CaO and A1203. The experimental results have been

discussed on the basis of the ionic conducting models and

other existing theories. It had been found that the

highly resistive cabal glass system can be made conducting

to a reasonable extent with the incorporation of the

alkali oxide, Na20.

PART I11

STUDY OF D.C CONDUCTIVITY IN Ca0-B203-A1203-Fe203

GLASS SYSTEM

3.9. Introduction

As mentioned in Section 3.5 of this Chapter, cabal

glass CaO-B 0 -A1203 has high electrical resistance and 2 3

the incorporation of charge carriers in it will enhance

its conductivity. The d.c conductivity of the glass

system CaO-B 0 -A1 0 -Na 0 has been systematically 2 3 2 3 2

studied and these studies have been described in Part I1

of this chapter. In this section the author discusses the

investigations on the d.c conductivity of Ca0-B203-A1203-

Fe203 glass system which may be consider to be the cabal

glass system containing Fe 0 a transition-metal oxide. 2 3'

The effects of concentration of Fe 0 2 3' A1203 and CaO and

temperature on the conductivity of the glass system were

studied in detail.

3.10. Experimental details

For the conductivity measurements, three series of

glass samples with following general formulae were

prepared.

Series ( i ) 20Ca0-(70-x) B 0 -10A1 0 -x Fe203; 2 3 2 3

x = 2, 4, 6 and 8.

Series (ii) yCa0-(85-x) B 0 -10Al 0 -5Fe203 2 3 2 3

y = 15, 18, 21 and 24.

Series (iii) 20Ca0-(75-x) B203-zAl 0 -5Fe 0 2 3 2 3

z = 3, 6, 9 and 12.

Four glass samples of the first series containing

varying concentration of Fe 0 and constant concentrations 2 3

of A1203 and CaO (Table 3.7) were prepared. Similarly,

the other two series of glass samples were prepared either

with varying concentration of CaO and constant

concentrations of Fe203 and A1203 (Table 3.8) or with

varying concentration of A1203 and constant concentrations

of Fe203 and CaO (Table 3.9).

chemically pure materials procured from BDH were used

to prepare the CaO-B 0 -A1 0 -Fe203 2 3 2 3 glass system.

Appropriate amounts of analar grade chemicals of

orthoboric acid (H BO 1, aluminium oxide (A1203), ferric 3 3

oxide (Fe203) and calcium carbonate (CaC03) were mixed and

melted in a horizontal muffle furnace at about 1450 K.

The melt was quenched to form glass samples of uniform

thickness and shape. The samples were annealed as

discussed in Section 3.6.2 of this Chapter. The amorphous

Table 3.7. Chemical composition of glass samples.

Composition (mol%) Sample No. ..........................................

CaO

Table 3.8. Chemical composition of glass samples.

Composition (mol % ) Sample No. .........................................

CaO B2°3 A1203 Fe20

Table 3.9. Chemical composition of glass samples.

Composition (mol % ) - Sample No. ..........................................

CaO B2°3 *l2'3 Fe20

nature of the glass samples were confirmed using X-ray

diffraction. The X-ray diffraction chart of a typical

glass sample is given in figure 3.6. Samples with diameter

about 10 mm and thickness about 1.5 mm were selected for

electrical conductivity measurements. Both the surfaces of

the glass samples were polished using fine silicon carbide

powder and with fine grade emery paper. Conducting

silver was vapour deposited on both the surfaces of the

glass samples to act as electrodes.

The resistance of all the glass samples were measured

over a temperature range from 300-525 K using Keithley

Model 715 electrometer in the V/I mode as described in

Part 11, Section 3.6.3 of this Chapter. Knowing the

thickness of the glass samples and area of the electrodes,

the d.c conductivity (6) was calculated at different

temperatures and the values are tabulated in tables 3.10

to 3.12.

3.11. Results and discussion

The d.c conductivity values of the first

series of glass samples (table 3.7) at different

temperatures are listed in tables 3.10. The schematic

representation of the variation of in 6 as a

function of 1000/T is as shown in the figure 3.7.

Table 3.10 Variation of d.c. conductivity with temperature of CaO-B 0 -A1 0 -Fe 0 glass system for different2cdnceAtSati6nG of Fe203

Temperature l n 6 ....................................... 10GP/T TF1 FF2 FF3 FF4 K

Table 3.11 Variation of d.c. conductivity with temperature of CaO-B 0 - A 1 0 -Fe 0 glass system for dif f erent2cance8t$ati8nz of CaO

Temperature In b ....................................... 100P/T FC1 FC 2 FC3 FC4 K

.e 3 . 1 2 V a r i a t i o n of d . c . c o n d u c t i v i t y w i t h t e m p e r a t u r e of CaO-B 0 -A1 0 -Fe 0 g lass s y s t e m for d i f f e r e n t 2 c d n c e i i t 2 a t i 2 n 2 of ~ 1 ~ 0 ~

Temperature I n 6 ............................................ li?p FA1 FA2 FA3 FA4 K

10001 T K-' Figure 3.7

Variation of 8d.c conductivity with temperature of CaO-B 0 - A 1 0 -Fe 0 glass system for different ?!odcen?r~tio~s30f Fe 0

2 3 '

1000/ T K' Figure 3 . 8

V a r i a t i o n o f d . c c o n d u c t i v i t y w i t h t e m p e r a t u r e o f CaO-B 0 - A 1 0 -Fe 0 g l a s s s y s t e m f o r d i f f e r e n t Zor4cen?rdt ioAs30f CaO.

F i g u r e 3 .9

V a r i a t i o n o f d . c c o n d u c t i v i t y w i t h t e m p e r a t u r e o f CaO-B 0 - A 1 0 -Fe O 3 g l a s s s y s t e m f o r d i f f e r e n t $oi?cen$ra t ioAs o f A 1 2 0 3 .

It can be observed from the table 3.10. and from figure

3.7 that conductivity of these glass samples increases

with temperature as a result of thermal agitation and show

that the glass system is a semiconducting one. It is also

observed that the conductivity increases with the

concentration of Fe 0 in the CaO-B 0 -A1 0 -Fe 0 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3

glass

system. The basic conduction mechanism in glasses

containing a transition metal oxide (Fe203) consists of

the transfer of charges from one valence state to the next

valence state of the transition metal ion. In otherwords

conduction is due to a transfer of electron between the

two neighbouring metal ions of different valency. These

localised states, seperated from the conduction band by an

average energy, will be distributed over a range of

barriers because of the randomly fluctuating field of the

disordered structure[50,67]. In the present case

conduction occurs due to an electron hopping directly

2 + between the occupied (Fe ) and unoccupied ( ~ e ~ + ) ion

sites. This process is shown schematically as:

2 + The hopping of electrons from the Fe to Fe 3 + state is

apparently not impeded by the relatively large separation

of these ions, nor by the presence of oxygen around them.

When the concentration of Fe203 content in the CaO-B 0 - 2 3

A1 0 -Fe203 glass system increases, the number of hopping 2 3

of carriers between the different valence states also

increases and hence the conductivity increases. Since the

glass system contain CaO and A1 0 the divalent Ca 2 3' 2+ and

trivalent ~ 1 ~ ' ions also have their small ionic

contribution to the conductivity. But their contribution

to the conductivity is almost constant in all glass

samples of series (i) since their concentration is kept

constant. The experimental results obtained for the d.c

conductivity and their variation with temperature and

concentration of Fe 0 do agree with the results reported 2 3

by several investigators on borate, phosphate and

germanate glass systems containing iron oxide[49,70,73].

The experimental values obtained for conductivity,

at different temperatures for the glass samples belonging

to series(ii1 and series(iii) (table 3.8 and 3.9

respectively) are listed in table 3.11 and 3.12. The

graphical representations of the variation of i * ~ with

temperature are shown in the figure 3.8 and 3.9. As it

is seen from the figures 3.8 and 3.9, conductivity

increases with temperature and with the concentration of

CaO and A1 0 2 3'

Eventhough the mobility of Ca 2+ ions is

+ . less compared with the mobility of the Na Ions, in the

2 + absence of alkali ions the divalent alkaline earth (Ca )

ions act as modifier ions which help to increase the

conductivity. Therefore, in this system of glass

conduction occurs as a total effect of ionic and

electronic motion. When the concentration of CaO is

2 + increased, the number of Ca ions taking part in the

conduction will also be more which results in an enhanced

conductivity. Since the concentration of Fe 0 and A1203 2 3

were kept constant throughout this series of glass system,

their contribution in the enhancement of conductivity

remain almost same. From figure 3.9 it is obvious that

the conductivity increases with the concentration of

A1203. The increase of conductivity with the A1203

concentration may be attributed to the increasing number

of non-bridging oxygens.

3.12. Conclusion

The d.c conductivity of the quarternary glass system

CaO-B 0 -A1 0 -Fe 0 had been studied over a temperature 2 3 2 3 2 3

range 300 to 523 K. The conductivity had been found to

depend on the concentrations of Fe 0 CaO and A1203 and 2 3'

the temperature. The experimental results have been

discussed on the basis of the existing theories. It had

been found that the highly resistive ternary glass system,

Ca0-B203-A1203 can be made conducting to an appreciable

extent by the addition of the transition-metal oxide,

FeZ03.

References

1. Ingram M.D. and Vincent C.A., Chem. Soc. Ann. Repts. A23 (1977).

2. Ravaine D., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 38, 353 (1980).

3. Tuller H.L., Button D.P. and Uhlmann D.R., J. Non- Cryst. Solids 40, 93 (1980).

4. Ingram M.D., Phys. Chem. Glasses 28, 215 (1987).

5. Oven A.E., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 35, 999 (1980).

6. Hughes K. and Isard J.O., In "physics of Electrolytes", Vol.1, 355, ed. Hladik J., Academic Press, London (1972).

7. Morey G.W., "The Properties of Glasses", 2nd Edn., Reinhold, N.Y. (1954).

8. Doremus R.H., "Introduction to Glass Science", Academic Press, N.Y. (1975).

9. Anderson 0.L and Stuart D.A., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 37, 573 (1954).

10. Hakim R.H. and Uhlmann D.R., Phys. Chem. Glasses 12, 132 (1971).

11. Rasch E. and Hinrichsen F., Z. Electrochem, 14, 41 (1908).

12. Owen A.E., "Progress in Ceramic Sciences", Vo1.3, p.77, Ed. J. Burke, Perqamon Press, N.Y. (1963).

13. Hench L.L. and Schaake H.F., "Introduction to Glass Science", p.583, Eds. Stevans H.J. and La Course W.C., Academic Press, N.Y. (1972).

14. Mazurin O.V., "Electrical Properties of Glasses", Consultant Bureau, N.Y. (1965).

15. Mazurin O.V. and Brailovski R.V., Sov. Phys. Solid State, 2, 243 (1960).

16. Seddon E., Tippet E. and Turner W.E.S., J. Soc. Glass. Tech. 16, 450 T (1932).

17. Kuznetsov A.Ya and Meljnikova I.G., Zhur. Fiz. Khim. 24, 1204 (1950).

Kuznetsov A.Ya., Zhur. Fiz. Khim., 33, 1492 (1959).

Stevels J.M., "Electrical Properties of Glasses", Handbuch der physik, V.20, P.350, Spinger Verlag (1957).

Hakim R.H. and Uhlrnann D.R., Phys. Chem. Glasses 12, 132 (1971).

Han Y.H., Kreidle N.J. and Day D.E., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 30, 241 (1979).

Matusita, Ito M., Kamiya. K and Sakka. S., Yogo- Kyokai-Shi, 10, 496 (1976).

Abu Sekkina M.M., Megahed A.A and Gohar I.A., Glass Ceram. Bull. 31, 28 (1984).

Mazurin O.V. and Lev. E. Ya., Izv. Vuzov. Fiz. 3, 43 (1960).

Smedly S.I. and Angel1 C.A., Solid State Ionics, 7, 21 (1978).

Konijnedijk O., Phylips Res. Repts. Suppl. 1, 182 (1975).

Otto K and ~ilberg M.E., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 51, 326 (1968).

Chakraborthy D and Chakraborthy. S., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 38, 295 (1980).

Anavekar R.V., Devaraj N. and Ramakrishna J., J. Mater. Sci. Bull. 31, 28 (1984).

Rao K.J and Rao C.N.R., Mater. Res. Bull-17, 1337 (1982).

Soppe Jr. W., Aldenkamp F and Hatagon H.W., J. Non- Cryst. Solids 1, 351 (1987).

Catching O.O., J. Appl. Phys. 52, 116 (1981).

Martin S.W., Solid St. Ion. 18, 472 (1986).

Rokade S., Singh K. and Deshpande V.K., Solid St. Ion. 18, 374 (1986).

Sudhakar Rao D., Kavt P.P. and Parvathi B., J. Mat. Sci. Lett. 9, 748 (1990).

Kurek P., Nourinski J.L. and Jakbowski W., Solid St. Ion. 36, 246 (1989).

Bohem L. and Angel1 C.A., Mater. Res. Bull. 15, 421 (1980).

Matusita K., Takayamas and Sakkas, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 40, 149 (1980).

Glass A.M., J. Appl. Phys. 51, 3756 (1980).

Denton E.P., Rawson H. and Stanworth J.E., 173, 1030 (1954).

Mackcenzie, In: "Modern Aspects of Vitreous State", Vo1.3., ed. Mackenzie J.D., Butterworths, London p.126 (1964).

Owen A. E., Contemp. Phys. 11, 257 (1970).

Owen A.E., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 25, 370 (1977).

Sayer M. and Mansingh A. , Phys. Rev. B6, 4629 (1972).

Kinser D.L. and Wilson L.K., In : "Recent Advances in Science and Technology of Materials, ed. A. Bishay, Plenum Press, New York, 77 (1974).

Murawski, J. Mater. Sci. 17, 2155 (1982).

Wong C. and Angell C.A., "Glass by Spectroscopy", Marcel1 Dekker, N.Y. (1975).

Kuznetsov A.Ya. and Tsekhomskii V.A., "Electrical properties and Structure on Glasses" Vo1.4, p.136 Consultant Bureau, N.Y. (1965).

Firzov V.M., Petrovykh N.V. and Litwinov P.I., Proceedings of the 10th International Congress on Glass, Kyoto (1974).

Gawish M. and Salesh M.N., J. Appl. Phys. 47. 5349 (1976).

Bandyopadhyay A.K. and Isard J.O., Proceeding of the 7th International Conference on Amorphous and Liquid Semiconductors, 683 (1977).

Zertsalova J.N., "Electrical Properties and Structure of Glass", Vo1.4, p.141, Consultant Bureau, N.Y. (1965).

Anderson R.A. and Mc Crone R.K., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 14, 112 (1974).

Karikijian C.R. and Sigety, Phys. Chem. Glasses, 9, 73 (1968).

Sawicki J.B., Sawicka and Gzowski, Phys. Stat. Solidi. A41, 173 (1977).

Vaugham J.G., Wilson L.K. and Kinser D.L., Bull. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 52, 384 (1977).

Taragin M.F., Eisensteni J.C. and Meller W., Ibid., 13, 29 (1972).

Sharma B.K., Dube D.C. and Mansingh A., J. Non- Cryst. Solids 65, 39 (1984).

Matusita K., Ito M., Kamiya K. and Sakka S., Yogo- Kyokai-Shii, 10, 496 (1976).

Yun Y.H. and Bray P.J., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 27, 363 (1978).

Catching O.O., J. Appl. Phys. 52, 116 (1981).

Ardelean I., Solid St. Commn. 27, 697 (1978).

Hiroshima H. and Yoshida T., Proceedings of 11th International Congress on Glass, Pragne, 11, 365 (1977).

Firsov V.M., Petrovykh N.V. and Litwinov P.I., proceedings of the 10th International Congress on Glass, Kyoto, Ceram Soc. of Japan, 7, 73 (1974).

Gdula K.A. and Tompkins, Glass Technol. 11, 164 (1970).

Bandyopadhyaya A.K. and Isand J.O., J. Phys. D 10, L99 (1977).

Sanad A.M., Kashif I., Abou Al-Azma M., Khaled M.A. and Farouk H., J. Mater. Sci. 21, 230 (1986).

Bansal T.K. and Mendiradatta R.G., Phys. Chem. Glasses 28, 242 (1987).

Kawamoto Y., Fukuzuka M., Ohta Y. and Imai M., Phys. Chem. Glasses 20, 54 (1979).

70. S e d d o n T i p p e t E. a n d T u r n e r W.E.S., J. S o c . G l a s s Tech . 1 6 , 450 T ( 1 9 3 2 ) .

71. M a c k e n z i e J . D . , J . Am. Ceram. S o c . 47 , 2 1 ( 1 9 6 4 ) .

72. O t t o K . , P h y s . Chem. Glasses 7 , 29 ( 1 9 6 6 ) .

73 . Huang P.N. a n d Huang X.H. , S o l i d S t . I o n i c . 3 6 t 59 ( 1 9 8 9 ) .

74 . Kennedy T.N. a n d M a c k e n z i c J . D . , P h y s . Chem. Glasses 8 , 1 6 9 ( 1 9 6 7 ) .

CHAPTER 4

DIELECTRIC CONSTANT AND kc. CONDUCTIVITY STUDIES ON

Ca0-B20341203-Na20 AND CaO-B20+i1203-Fe203 GLASS SYSTEMS

CHAPTER 4

DIELECTRIC CONSTANT AND A.C CONDUCTIVITY STUDIES ON

CaO-B 0 -A1 0 -Na 0 AND CaO-B 0 -A1 0 -Fe 0 2 3 2 3 2 2 3 2 3 2 3

GLASS SYSTEMS

4.1. Introduction

Dielectric characteristics of glasses are of

increasing importance as the field of solid state

electronics continues to expand rapidly. The principal

applications of glassy dielectrics are as capacitance

elements in electronic circuits and as electrical

insulators. For these applications the properties of most

concern are the dielectric constant, dielectric loss

factor, and the dielectric strength. New devices and new

applications are continually increasing the frequency

range and the range of environmental conditions,

particularly temperature, that are of practical interest.

Numerous publications have been devoted to the study

of dielectric constant, a.c. conductivity and other

properties in the alternating fields in alkali oxide

containing oxide glasses[l-31, transition metal oxide

containing semiconducting glasses[4-71 and in a wide range

of superionic glasses[8-111. The study of dielectric

properties of glasses has attracted a great deal of

attention because of their promising utility in various

fields of interest to human beings. Due to their

application in solid high energy density batteries[l2,13]

and in some electrochemical devices[l4,15], the superionic

conducting glasses are extensively studied. The

frequency dependent conductivity and dielectric constant

provides important information on the ionic or electronic

transport mechanism in disordered materials. It can give

an insight into the structure of the materials since the

localised electronic states within the material are

created due to the presence of disorder in the atomic

configuration and/or the composition.

This chapter is divided into three parts. Part I

gives a brief review of the dielectric constant and a.c

conductivity studies in alkali oxide containing and

transition metal oxide containing oxide glasses. Part I1

gives a detailed account of the present studies conducted

by the author on the dielectric constant and a.c

conductivity of the quarternary glass system CaO-B 0 - 2 3

A1 0 -Na20. Part 111 is a detailed description of the 2 3

study of dielectric constant and a.c conductivity of the

quarternary glass system CaO-B 0 -A1203-Fe203. 2 3

PART I

REVIEW OF DIELECTRIC CONSTANT AND A.C CONDUCTIVITY STUDIES

ON OXIDE GLASSES CONTAINING ALKALI/TRANSITION METAL OXIDE

4.2. Review

A brief report of the dielectric constant, dielectric

loss and a.c. conductivity studies on inorganic oxide

glasses containing alkali oxide or transition metal oxide

is given in this section.

Study of a.c conductivity of several systems of

chalcogenide glasses and oxide glasses containing

transition metal oxide[5-81 have been reported. But

comparatively less work have been reported on inorganic

glasses containing alkali oxide. Bottger et a1.[9]

has reviewed the work up to 1976 on the hopping

conductivity in ordered and disordered solids.

It is observed that the dielectric constant,

dielectric loss, a.c electrical conductivity etc. always

depend on the frequency of the alternating field and the

temperature of the substance. In inorganic glasses

containing alkali oxide, the conduction and the dielectric

relaxation take place as a result of the local motion of

the trapped alkali ions around the non-bridging

oxygens[l0,ll]. However recent experimental and

theoretical advances[l2-151 suggested that the frequency

dependence of conductivity could also be due to the jump

diffusion of mobile ions as in the case of d.c

conductivity.

It is now well accepted that the general condition

for semiconducting behaviour in transition-metal oxide

glasses is that the transition-metal ion should be

capable of existing in more than one valence state, so

that the conduction can take place by the transfer of

electrons from low valence state to high valence state.

Possible oxides include those of Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co,

Ni, Cu, Mo and W. The properties of these oxides are

much less fully understood than those of the classical

semiconductors such as silicon and germanium. The

vanadium system has been studied most thoroughly[l6-181

among the above said oxides.

It is not yet clear whether the electrical properties

are best described by an energy-band scheme as indicated

by Morin[l91 for some oxides or by hopping between

localized states as explained by Mott[ZO], and Austin and

Mott[21].

A review of the dielectric properties of glasses

investigated upto 1964 has been given by Mackenzie(221.

Reviews on the conduction processes are made by Mott[ZO],

Austin and Mott[21] and Owen[23]. The investigations on

the dielectric conductivity mechanism in ordered and

disordered solids were reviewed by Bottger et a1.[91 in

1976.

The frequency and temperature dependence of

conductivity, dielectric properties, infrared absorption

and EPR studies of semiconducting phosphate glasses were

reported by Sayer et a1.[8]. The examination of

conduction process in semiconducting phosphate glasses

suggests that a polaron model is applicable with some

evidence that hopping occurs in the adiabatic regime. It

was also found that the polaron interactions have to be

considered[81. Sayer et al. measured the a.c conductivity

and dielectric constant over a frequency range 0.1 -

100 KHz and a temperature range from 77 to 400 K and

observed that the conductivity increased with

temperature. These results were similar to the results

published in the case o f othersemiconducting

glasses[6,24]. At low temperature the frequency

dependence of the a.c conductivity was shown to be of the

f orm GaC O( as where S is about 0.85. This type of

behaviour is well-known in amorphous systems and has been

attributed to the relaxation times arising from local

order[6,24].

The frequency dependence of electrical conductivity

of semiconducting phosphate glasses containing tungsten

were studied by Mansingh et al.[25]. They observed that

the measured a.c conductivity depends strongly on the

frequency according to the relation c C w ] = A OS

where 0 < s < 1. The weak frequency dependence is due to

the contribution of d.c conductivity to the measured a.c

conductivity. Mansingh et a1.[25] also reported that the

conductivity increases with the concentration of the

tungsten oxide content.

a.c conductivity of binary V 0 -P 0 2 5 2 5 glasses

containing 40, 50, 50 and 70 mol% V205 was measured at

temperatures between 100 and 423 K and for frequencies up

to 100 MHz by Murawski et a1.[26]. The results were

interpreted in terms of the Long's polaron hopping model.

The polaron parameters calculated from the above model are

in good agreement with the values obtained by other

means[8].

Bogomolova et a1.[271 reported the a.c and d.c

electrical conductivity studies of some semiconducting

barium vanadate glasses doped with Fe 0 2 3'

The a.c electrical resistivity, dielectric constant,

and dielectric loss of calcium borate glass system

containing the transition-metal oxide (Fe203) was

investigated by Saleh et a1.[28] in order to determine the

conduction models of the system. Saleh et a1.[28]

prepared the glass system containing different iron

concentration of molar composition (70-x)B 0 -30CaO-xFe 0 2 3 2 3

with x upto 32 mol%. The electronic properties are

measured from 77 to 8 0 0 ~ ~ in the frequency range 20 Hz to

100 KHz. They observed that the glasses with Fe203

content less than 20 mol% were amorphous, while those

containing from 20 to 23 mol% were devitrified. It was

also observed that increasing the iron oxide content in

this glass system caused an increase in the d.c

conductivity, the a.c conductivity, the dielectric

constant, and the frequency of the dielectric loss peak.

Thermoelectric power measurements of the glass system

indicated that all glasses studied were n-type. The

experimental results of Saleh et a1.[28] on a.c and d.c

conductivity and its variation with frequency and

temperature support the idea of a hopping conduction

mechanism, for glasses less than 20 mol% Fe203 and a

diffusive conduction mechanism for calcium borate glasses

having Fe203 greater than 20 mo18.

Duran et a1.[29] reported some electrical properties

of phosphate glasses containing alkaline-earth oxide doped

with CuO. They observed a frequency and temperature

dependence on the dielectric constant, loss tangent and

a.c conductivity of the glass system. These properties

are also dependent on the concentration of CuO and hence

+ on the redox ratio Cu /Cutotal.

In 1987, Hassan et a1.[30] reported the a.c

conductivity, (cc), of copper phosphate semiconducting

glasses with different composition. They measured the

dielectric constant, a.c conductivity etc. in the

frequency range from lo2 to lo7 Hz and over the

temperature range from 300 to 513 K. Hassan et a1.[30]

observed a frequency and temperature dependence of

dielectric constant and a.c conductivity of this glass

system. The observed frequency dependence of conductivity

was expressed as G - C ~ ) ~ S where 0.7 < s < 1 up to 1 MHz.

At frequencies above 1 MHz the conductivity obeys an

equation of the form 6 ~ ~ ) d w S where s > 1. The

increase in conductivity at higher frequencies was

explained as follows: As the frequency increases the hops

will become shorter and shorter and in the limit of

interatomic distances, will no longer be randomly

distributed and will settle to a frequency dependence

2 which tends t o w [30].

Electrical conductivity studies (both d.c and a.c) on

semiconducting glasses of presodimium and calcium

containing copper phosphate glasses were reported by

Mohammed et a1.[311.

These glasses exhibit frequency dependence of a.c

conductivity and the main feature of a.c measurements was

that the observed frequency dependence in the measured

range could be expressed as 6 - - Gtotal -6d.c

= A@'. ac

The same type of behaviour was reported by Lynch and

Sayer[32] for vanadium phosphate glasses.

Dielectric properties and internal friction of

borate glass system containing mixed alkali was

investigated by Th. Van Gemert et a1.1331. They observed

that the dielectric properties of mixed alkali borate

glasses are completely analogous to the dielectric

properties of silicate and phosphate glasses. They also

reported a strong linear dependence of the dielectric

properties of the glass system on the concentration of

alkali oxide.

The electric and dielectric properties of ternary

inorganic glass containing alkali oxide (Na20-Mg0-Si02)

were studied by Abelard et a1.[34] over a frequency range

from 1 Hz to 100 K Hz and a temperature range from 350 - 600 K using the impedance spectroscopy. Similar types of

works on dielectric properties were also reported

earlier[35-371. Abelard et a1.[34] observed, a dependence

of dielectric relaxation on the concentration of the

+ . alkali ion (Na Ion). It has been proved that dispersion

+ arises from the motion of alkali (Na ) ions. Experimental

data were interpreted with the help of Continuous Time

Random Walk (CTRW), formalism developed by Sher and Lax

which assumes that all the alkali ions are mobile but with

different mobilities[34].

Kawamura et a1.[381 in 1987 reported some

measurements on a.c conductivity of borate glasses

containing mixed alkali oxides. The complex a.c

conductivity was measured in the range from 5 Hz to

500 KHz and for wide range of temperature. They observed

an increase in the conductivity with the frequency as well

as with temperature. Kawamura et a1.[38] concluded that

frequency dependence of a.c conductivity at lower

frequency region is due to the interfacial impedance or

space-charge polarisation[l2,39]. They also suggested

that the frequency dependence of conductivity in alkali

containing oxide glasses is a kind of dielectric

relaxation and may be due to the local motion of the

trapped alkali ions around the non-bridging oxygens.

Studies on the dielectric constant and conductivity

relaxation of Li20-B203-WO glasses weLr reported by 3

Huang et a1.1401. In ion containing glasses, the

dielectric properties mainly arise from the motion of

ions. The free energy barriers impeding the ionic

diffusion, however, can be expected to vary from site to

site, and hence there may be different ionic motions in

glasses. The first is the rotation of ions around their

negative sites. The second is the short-distance

transport, i.e., ions hop out of sites with low free-

energy barriers and tend to pile up at sites with high

free-energy barriers in the electric field direction in

d.c or low frequency electric field or oscillate between

the sites with high frequency barriers in an a.c electric

field. Huang et a1.[40] have indicated that both the first

and second motions make a contribution to the dielectric

constant of glasses.

The effect of sodium and molybdenum phosphate glasses

have been studied by d.c and a.c conductivity measurements

over a wide temperature range by Tarsikka et a1.[41] in

1990. The observed experimental results indicate that the

electronic contribution to d.c conductivity increases with

molybdenum concentration. It is difficult to seperate the

ionic conduction from electronic conduction. a.c

conductivity measurements reported by them showed a

dependence of a.c conductivity on frequency of the applied

electric field and the conductivity was found to obey the

relation caC = A a S , where s is a parameter. The value

of s evaluated from the relation c

= A m S is

comparable to those evaluated from the hopping over

barrier model[30]. The dielectric relaxation frequency

for these glasses has been observed to be 1.5 KHz in the

temperature range of 100-200 K.

PART I1

STUDY OF DIELECTRIC CONSTANT AND A.C CONDUCTIVITY IN

Ca0-B203-A1203-Na20 GLASS SYSTEM

4.3. Introduction

In this part the author reports a detailed study of

the dielectric constant and a.c conductivity in

quarternary glass system CaO-B 0 -A1203-Na20. 2 3 The

dependence of a.c conductivity and dielectric constant on

the concentrations of Na20, CaO and A1 0 and temperature 2 3

tias studied systematically.

4.4. Experimental Details

4.4.1. Glass composition and measurement of dielectric

constant and a.c conductivity

Three series of the glass system Ca0-B203-A1203-Na20

containing different concentrations of Na 0 , CaO and A1203 2

and of compositions as given below were prepared for the

present investigation:

Series (i) 10 CaO - 60 B203 - 15 A1203 - 15 Na20 ..SSl

10 CaO - 51 B203 - 15 A1203 - 24 Na20 ..SS4

Series (ii) 5 CaO - 65 B203 - 15 A1203 - 15 Na20 ..SCl

20 CaO - 50 B203 - 15 A1203 - 15 Na20 ..SC4

Series (iii) 10 CaO - 70 B203 - 5 A1203 - 15 Na20 ..SAl

10 CaO - 55 B203 - 20 AI2O3 - 15 Na20 ..SA4

Reagent grade chemicals (99% purity or better)

acquired from BDH were used for the preparation of the

glass samples. The glass samples were prepared by

following a procedure exactly similar to that described in

Section 3.6.2 of Chapter 3. Amorphous nature of the glass

samples was confirmed by the X-ray diffraction patterns.

Glass samples of uniform thickness about 1 mm and diameter

about lOmm were selected for the dielectric studies. Both

the faces of the glass samples were polished and coated

with a thin layer of silver paint to act as electrodes.

The electrical measurements of the glass samples were made

6 in the frequency range lo2 to 10 Hz. The dielectric

constant measurements were carried out by holding the

glass sample in a sample holder which could be heated to

different temperatures. The temperature of the sample

which could be maintained constant with an accuracy of

0 0.1 C was measured using a chromel-alumel thermocouple.

Dielectric constant and a.c conductivity measurements were

taken over a temperature range from 300 to 425 K.

Direct measurements of capacitance and dielectric

loss factor tand (D) in the glass samples were made by

a Hewlett-Packard impedance analyser (type 4192A LF)

having a frequency range of 5Hz to 13MHz. In these

measurements an a.c signal of 500 Vrms was applied across

the sample. Zero offset adjustments were made for

different frequency ranges to ensure the precision of the

measurements. Dielectric constant was derived from the

measured values of capacitance after eliminating the lead

and fringe capacitance.

4.5. Results and Discussion

(i) Dielectric constant

The real part of the dielectric constant ( ) of

the glass samples of the Ca0-B203-A1 0 -Na20 system was 2 3

determined for a wide range of composition using the

formula[421

where c, the capacitance of the glass sample in pico

farads t, the thickness of the sample in centimeters and

A, the area of cross-section of the electrodes in square

centimeters. The dielectric constant values obtained at

different temperatures and frequencies are tabulated in

table 4.1 to 4.6. Figures 4.1 to 4.6 represents the

variation of the real part of the dielectric constant

( E' ) with frequency of the glass samples at different

temperatures.

From the figures 4.1 to 4.6, it is clear that the

dielectric constant of all the series of glass systems

increases slightly with increase in temperature. The slow I

variation of the dielectric constant ( E ) with temperature

is the usual trend in ionic conducting materialsr431. The

temperature has a complicated influence on the dielectric

constant. Generally, increasing the temperature of the

material decreases the dielectric polarisation. The

increase of ionic distance due to the temperature

influences the ionic and the electronic polarisation.

Similarly the changes in the ionic polarisation are not

very large even assuming the presence of some dipoles and

their contribution to the dielectric constant[441. From

Debye's theory[44], it is known that the dielectric I

constant ( E ) is proportional to the temperature. Contrary

to this theory the ~eported results[471 indicate a slight

increase in the real part of the dielectric constant with

temperature. The present results are also in good

agreement with the reported results.

Table 4.1 Variation of dielectric constant with frequency for the sample SS1 at different temperatures

Frequency Dielectric constant KHz ..............................................

3231: 348K 373K 398K 423K

Table 4.2 Variation of dielectric constant with frequency for the sample SS4 at different temperatures

Frequency Dielectric constant KHz ..............................................

323K 348K 373K 398K 423i:

.5 13.31 13.61 14.10 14.78 15.39 1 12.91 13.01 13.24 13.45 13.96 10 12.62 12.72 12.91 12.96 12.98 3 0 12.51 12.62 12.86 12.92 12.94 5 0 12.35 12.45 12.79 12.80 12.89 7 0 12.00 12.31 12.59 12.65 12.69 100 12.22 12.47 12.50 12.58 12.40 300 12.13 12.35 12.40 12.45 12.15 500 12.06 12.27 12.35 12.40 12.07 700 12.01 12.23 12.33 12.38 12.01 1000 11.98 12.21 12.30 12.36 11.96 3000 11.97 12.21 12.27 12.35 11.89

Table 4.3 Variation of dielectric constant with frequency for the sample SC1 at different temperatures.

Frequency Dielectric constant KHz ..............................................

323R 348K 373K 398K 423K

Table 4.4 Variation of dielectric constant with frequency for the sample SC4 at different temperatures

Frequency Dielectric constant KHz ..............................................

323K 348K 373K 398K 423K

Table 4.5 Variation of dielectric constant with frequency for the sample SA1 at different temperatures

Frequency Dielectric constant KHz ..............................................

323;; 348K 373K 398K 423K

Table 4.6 Variation of dielectric constant with frequency for the sample SA4 at different temperatures

Frequency Dielectric constant KHz ..............................................

3231: 348K 373K 398K 423K

Log f

Figare.4.l Variation of dielectric constant with frequency for the sample SS1 at different temperatures.

Figure4.2 Variation of dielectric constant with frequency for the sample SS4 at different temperatures.

Log f

Figure4.3 Variation of dielectric constant with frequency for the sample SC1 at different temperatures.

Figure4.4 Variation of dielectric constant with frequency for the sample SC4 at different temperatures.

Figure4.5 Variation of dielectric constant with frequency for the sample S A ~ at different temperatures.

Figure4.6 Variation of dielectric constant with frequency for the sample SA4 at different temperatures.

As is seen from figures 4.1 to 4.6 value of &I

decreases monotonically with the increase of the frequency

of the applied electric field. Since the glass system

+ under the present study contains alkali ions (Na ions),

the dielectric properties mainly arise due to the movement

of these ions. The free energy barriers impeding the

ionic diffusion can be expected to vary from site to site,

so there are different types of ionic motions in

glasses[47]. The first is the rotation of ions around

their negative sites. The second is the short distance

transport, i.e., ions hop out of sites with low free

energy barriers or oscillate between the sites with high

free energy barriers in an a.c electric field. Both the

first and second type of motion make a contribution to

enhance the value of real part of dielectric constant of

the glass samples[44]. The decrease in dielectric

constant with frequency may also be due to the increase in

leakage current which is normally attributed to a

dielectric constant reduction[47]. The variation of€'

must be mainly due to the space - charge polarisation upto lo4 Hz and at higher frequencies it must be due to the

rontributions from ionic, dipolar and electronic

polarisation[46].

It is seen from figure 4.7 that the real part of the

dielectric constant &I increases with the concentration of

Na20 in the CaO-B203- A1 0 -Na20 glass system. When the 2 3

concentration of the alkali oxide is more, the number

+ density of the alkali ions (Na ions) increases and the

structure of the glass system gets modified so as to

benefit the ion motions, there by increasing the

polarisation. These factors lead to an increase in the

dielectric constant[47]. Since the concentrations of

A1203 and CaO are kept constant in the first series of the

glass system, their contribution for the enhancement of

remains almost constant in both the glass samples. Hence

the increase in & I , in the case of glass samples of the

+ . first series must be due to the increase in Na lons[47].

It is also observed from the figure 4.8 and 4.9 that the

value of &' increases slightly with the concentration of

CaO and A1203 respectively (for glass samples belonging to

series ii and iii respectively). This may also be due to

2 + the increased polarisation of Ca and ~ 1 ~ ' ions in the

corresponding glass systems[45,46]. It is inferred that

+ Na ions are much more effective in increasing the value

of than ca2+ or A13+ ions.

Ficpre4.7 Variation of dielectric constant with frequency for different concentrations of Na20.

Figure4.8 Variation of dielectric constant with frequency for different concentrations of CaO.

Figure4.9 Variation of dielectric constant with frequency for different concentrations of A1203.

1G

15.

1 4 .

E' 13.

12

2 3 4 5 G 7 8 Log t

'

Ter?p = 423 Y

& 5 3 4 SAl

.

(ii) a.c. conductivity

The a.c conductivity of the glass samples were

calculated using the formula Cac = d k o , whereo = 2TI f,

f is the frequency of the alternating field applied, 5" ,

the imaginary part of the dielectric constant and

Eo is the dielectric constant of the free space[8,57].

The measured a.c conductivity values of CaO-B 0 - 2 3

A 1 0 -Na 0 glass system containing two different 2 3 2

concentrations of Na20, A1203 and CaO at different

temperatures and frequencies are given in table 4.7 to

4.12. Figures 4.10 to 4.15 represent the variations of

a.c conductivity with frequency at different temperatures.

From figures 4.10 to 4.15 it is obvious that the a.c

conductivity increases with frequency of the applied

field and also with temperature. As the temperature

increases, more and more ions can dissociate and get over

high free-energy barriers to take part in the conduction

and hence the conductivity increases. The a.c

conductivity (6 ) is found to depend on the frequency (U) a c

of the applied a.c field according to the relation:

5 c = A ', where A is a constant, where s, is a

parameter and (a= Znf), the angular frequency. In glass

samples containing an alkali oxide variation in

Table 4.7 Variation of a.c conductivity with frequency for the sample S S 1 at different temperatures

Frequency a.c. conductivity KHz

323K 348K 373K 398K 423K

Table 4.8 Variation of a.c conductivity with frequency for the sample SS4 at different temperatures

Frequency a.c. conductivity KH 2

323K 348K 373K 398K 423K

Table 4.9 Variation of a.c conductivity with frequency for the sample SC1 at different temperatures

Frequency a.c. conductivity KHz

323K 348K 373K 398K 423K

Table 4.10 Variation of a.c conductivity with frequency for the sample SC4 at different temperatures

Frequency a.c. conductivity K H z

323K 348K 373K 398K 423K

Table 4 . 1 1 Variation of a.c conductivity with frequency for the sample SA1 at different temperatures

Frequency a.c. conductivity K H z

3 2 3 K 3 4 8 K 3 7 3 K 3 9 8 K 4 2 3 K

0 .5

Table 4 . 1 2 Variation of a.c conductivity with frequency for the sample SA4 at different temperatures

Frequency a . c . conductivity K H z

Figure.4.10 Variation of a.c conductivity with frequency for different temperatures.(sample SS1).

Figure4.11 Variation of a.c conductivity with frequency for different ternperatures.(sample 554).

-77 log l

Figure4.12 Variation of a.c conductivity with frequency for different temperatures.(sample SC1).

Figure4.13 Variation of a.c conductivity with frequency for different ternperatures.(sample S C 4 ) .

Ficpre4.14 Variation of a.c conductivity with frequency for different ternperatures.(sarnple S A l ) .

Figure4.15 Variation of a.c conductivity with frequency for different temperatures.(sample S A 4 ) .

conductivity with frequency may be attributed to a kind of +

dielectric relaxation of the local motion of the Na ions

around the non-bridging oxygens[lO,ll]. However, recent

experimental and theoretical studies[l2-151 suggest that

the frequency dependent conductivity can also be due to a

t . jump diffusion of the mobile alkali ions (Na Ions) as in

the case of d.c conductivity. Pike[50], ~pringlet[51] and

Elliot[52] have suggested that the frequency dependent

conductivity in alkali oxide containing glasses is due to

the hopping over inequivalent barriers of the charge

carriers in the glass system. At low frequency region the

enhancement of conductivity with frequency may be

attributed to the interfacial imped&?ce or space-charge

polarisation[l2,39]. At higher frequencies, the rate of

increase of conductivity of the glass system studied is

found to be slightly higher and this may be a continuation

of the low frequency process[481. As the frequency

increases the hopes will become shorter and in the limit

of interatomic distances, will no longer be randomly

distributed and the conductivity will settle to a

frequency dependence which tends to w S where s is

slightly greater than unity[8]. This type of behaviour is

well-known in amorphous systems and has been attributed to

the distribution of relaxation times arising from the

disorder[48,49].

Figure4.16 Variation of a.c conductivity with temperature for different concentrations of NaZO and frequency.

Figure4.17 Variation of a.c conductivity with temperature for different concentrations of CaO and frequency.

Figure4.18 Variation of a.c conductivity with temperature for different concentrations of A 1 2 0 3 and frequency.

- -rE -'-5 'S

b . 8'. J G

'

KHz

As it is seen from figure 4.16 that a.c conductivity

increases with concentration of Na20. This is

attributed to the increase in number of mobile carriers

taking part in the conductivity mechanism when the

concentration of Na 0 increases. From figure 4.17 and 2

4.18, it is obvious that a.c conductivity of the glass

system studied decreases with the concentration of CaO and

Al2O3, respectively. This may be attributed to the

blocking action of ca2+ ions in the case of the glass

samples belonging to the second series and due to the

electronegativity of the ~ 1 ~ ' ions for the third series.

4.6. Conclusion

CaO-B 0 -A1 0 -Na20 glasses containing different 2 3 2 3

concentrations of Fe203, CaO and A1203 were prepared.

The variation of dielectric constant and a.c conductivity

(6;;c) was studied over a temperature range from 300 to

425 K. The value of real part of the dielectric constant

and a.c conductivity was found to decrease with the

frequency and increases with temperature and to depend on

the concentration of the constituents.

PART 111

STUDY OF DIELECTRIC CONSTANT AND A.C CONDUCTIVITY IN

Ca0-B203-A1203-Fe203 GLASS SYSTEM

4.7. Introduction

It is now well accepted that the general condition

for semiconducting behaviour in transition metal oxide

containing oxide glasses is that the transition metal ion

should be capable of existing in more than one valence

state, so that conduction can take place by the transfer

of electrons from low to high valence state[52]. The

frequency dependence of electrical conductivity and

dielectric constant of these types of glasses have been

the subject of detailed theoretical and experimental

investigations[53,54]. a.c conductivity (6;;C) due to

hopping conduction has been reported to increase with

frequency) w according to the relation s cacd

where s is a parameter. Such a frequency dependence,

which has been attributed to a wide distribution of

relaxation times due to distribution of jump distanceL551

and barrier heights[50], has been observed in a wide range

of low mobility materials[56]. In this chapter, the author

presents the investigations carried out to study the

frequency and temperature dependence of dielectric

constant ( &' ) and a.c conductivity ( Cat) in CaO-B203- AL o -Fe 0

2 3 2 3 ' Effects of change in the concentration of

Fe203, CaO, and A 1 0 on the values of & and 6ac 2 3

have

been discussed on the basis of the existing theories.

4.8. Experimental Details

Three series of glass samples containing different

concentrations of Fe 0 CaO and A1203 and of different 2 3'

compositions as given below were prepared for the present

study.

Series (i) 20 CaO - 68 B203 - 10 A1203 - 2 Fe203 ..FFl

20 CaO - 62 B203 - 10 A1203 - 8 Fe203 ..FF4

Series (ii) 5 CaO - 80 B 0 2 3

- 10 A1203 - 5 Fe 0 ..FC1 2 3

20 CaO - 65 B203 - 10 A1203 - 5 Fe203 ..FC4

Series (iii) 20 CaO - 80 B203 - 5 A1203 - 5 Fe203 . . F A 1

20 CaO - 65 B203 - 20 A1203 - 5 Fe203 ..FA4

The details of the preparation of the glass samples

are described in Section 3.6.2 of Chapter 3. The

I experimental set up and the measurements of & and loss

factor tan 6 (D) are exactly similar to those given in

Section 4.4.1 of this chapter. The capacitance (c) and

loss factor tan 6 for different samples at different

temperatures were measured.

4.9. Results and Discussion

(i) Dielectric constant

The real part of the dielectric constant ( E' ) was

calculated with the help of the relation[42].

at different temperatures and for different concentration

of Fe203, CaO and A1203. The calculated values of the I

real part of the dielectric constant ( & ) are tabulated

in table 4.13 to 4.18. For a given composition of the

glass system, the value of &' were found to decrease with

temperature. The variation of &I with frequency

and temperature is schematically represented in figures

4.19 to 4.24.

As is seen from figures 4.19 to 4.24, the value of I

dielectric constant ( & ) decreases monotonically with

the frequency of the applied alternating field for all the

glass samples studied. The decrease in the value of

with the frequency may be due to an increase in the

leakage current with the increase in frequency which is I

normally attributed to a capacitance reduction[30]. Since&

is a measure of the capacitance, the value of &' should

decrease with the frequency of the alternating field

applied[ 301.

Table 4.13 Variation of dielectric constant with frequency for the sample FF1 at different temperatures

Frequency Dielectric constant

(KHz) 3231: 348K 373K 398K 423K

Table 4.14 Variation of dielectric constant with frequency for the sample FF4 at different temperatures

Frequency Dielectric constant ........................................... (KHz) 323K 348K 373K 398K 423K

Table 4.15 Variation of dielectric constant with frequency for the sample FC1 at different temperatures

Frequency ~ielectric constant ___________________------------------------ (KHz) 323K 348K 373K 398K 423K

.5 10.58 10.89 11.19 11.50 11.98 1 10.39 10.65 10.81 11.21 11.58 10 10.28 10.50 10.65 11.01 11.22 30 10.17 10.42 10.52 10.95 11.01 5 0 10.12 10.38 10.50 10.87 10.91 7 0 10.06 10.35 10.47 10.76 10.89 100 10.03 10.30 10.41 10.71 10.78 300 10.00 10.27 10.37 10.65 10.74 500 9.95 10.21 10.32 10.61 10.71 700 9.94 10.19 10.30 10.56 10.68 1000 9.92 10.17 10.28 10.53 10.65 3000 9.81 10.09 10.19 10.38 10.49

Table 4.16 Variation of dielectric constant with frequency for the sample FC4 at different temperatures

-- --

Frequency Dielectric constant ........................................... (KHz) 3231: 348K 373K 398K 423K

- .-

700 11.25 11.62 11.75 11.91 11.96 1 OOG 11.21 11.55 11.49 11.85 11.89 3000 11.07 11.14 11.25 11.34 11.38

Table 4.17 Variation of dielectric constant with frequency for the sample FA1 at different temperatures

Frequency Dielectric constant ..........................................

(KHz) 323K 348K 373K 398K 423K

Table 4.18 Variation of dielectric constant with frequency for the sample FA4 at different temperatures

Frequency Dielectric constant

(KHz) 3231: 348K 373K 398K 423K

15'

14

12

2 3 4 5 0 7

Log f

13

12

C'

11

10

Figure4.20 Variation of dielectric constant with frequency for the sample FF4 at different temperatures.

373K . 313K

1 3 I 5 6 7

Loq f

Figure4.19 Variation of dielectric constant with frequency for the sample FF1 at different temperatures.

Figure4.21 Variation of dielectric constant with frequency for thc sample FC1 at different temperatures.

Figure4.22 Variation of dielectric constant with frequency for the sample FC4 at different temperatures.

Figure4.23 Variation of dielectric constant with frequency for the sample FA1 at different temperatures.

14 '

1 3 '

373K

2 -

3 4 5 6 7 0

Log f

F i g ~ r ~ 4 . 2 4 Variation of dielectric constant with frequency for the sample FA4 at different temperatures.

Figures 4.19 to 4.24 represents the variation of

&I with frequency and temperature of the glass samples

belonging to the series (i). It is clear from the I

figures 4.25 that the value of & increases with the Fe203

concentration in the glass system. This may be due to

the increased number of electrons participating in the

polarization process. When concentration of Fe203

increases, the number of electrons involved in the I

polarization will also be more. Since & is a direct

measure of polarisation/unit volume, & should increase

with the concentration of Fe 0 2 3' The value of &' may

also depend on the concentration CaO and A1203. i.e., on

the polarization of ca2+ and ~ 1 ~ + ions in the glass

system. Since the concentration of CaO and A1203 were

kept constant in the glass samples of first series, their

contribution to & remains constant. Therefore, the

variation in 6' must be due to the Fe 0 content alone. 2 3 I

Similarly, it is observed that the value of increases

with the concentration of CaO and A1 0 of the 2nd and 3rd 2 3

series of glass system respectively (figures 4.26 and

4.27). This may also be due to the increased

polarization effect of ca 2+ and A1 3+ ions in the

corresponding systems[46]. In these series of glass

systems, since the concentration of Fe203 was kept I

constant the contribution to & remains almost same in

Fiqurc4.25 Variation of dielectric constant with frequency for different concentrations of ft 0 2 3

Fiqure4.26 Variation of dielectric constant with frequency for different concentrations of CaO.

~iqure4.27 Variation of dielectric constant with frequency for different concentrations of A 1 0

2 3 '

both the series. Similar results of increase in the value

of E with the concentration of transition metal oxide

were reported by many investigators[8,28,30].

(ii) a.c. Conductivity

a.c conductivity was calculated from the relation

given in Section 4.5 of this chapter, in the frequency

6 range lo2 to 10 Hz and over a temperature range 300 to

425 K for Fe203 containing glasses of different

composition. The a.c conductivity values calculated are

tabulated in tables 4.19 to 4.24. The graphical

representation of the conductivity with frequency and

temperatures are as shown in figures 4.28 to 4.33. It

was observed that in all samples CaC increases with

temperature as expected for normal semiconductors. As is

seen from the figures 4.28 to 4.33, conductivity increases

with the frequency of the applied field for all series of

Ca0-B203-A1 0 -Fe203 glass system. 2 3

The conduction in these type of glasses is mainly due

to the polaronic hopping and due to the motion of ions.

Since in the first series, the concentration of CaO and

A1203 were kept constant the ionic conductivity part

remains almost same in these series. Therefore the

Table 4. 19 Variation of a.c. conductivity with frequency for the sample FF1 at different temperatures

Frequency a.c. conductivity

(KHz) 323K 348K 373K 398K 423K

0 . 5

Table 4. 2 0 Variation of a.c. conductivity with frequency for the sample FF4 at different temperatures

Frequency a.c. conductivity ................................................

(KHz) 323K 348K 373K 398K 423K

Table 4. 21 Variation of a.c. conductivity with frequency for the sample FC1 at different temperatures

Frequency a.c. conductivity ................................................

(KHz ) 323K 348K 373K 398K 423K

Table 4. 22 Variation of a.c. conductivity with frequency for the sample FC4 at different temperatures

Frequency a.c. conductivity ................................................ (KHz) 323K 348K 373K 398K 423K

Table 4. 23 Variation of a.c. conductivity with frequency for the sample FA1 at different temperatures

Frequency a.c. conductivity ................................................ (KHz) 323:: 348X 373K 3 9 8 ~ 423K

Table 4. 24 Variation of a.c. conductivity with frequency for the sample FA4 at different temperatures

Frequency a.c. conductivity ................................................

(KHz) 323K 348K 373K 398K 423K

Figure4.28 Variation of a.c conductivity with frequency for different temperatures (sample FF1).

Figure4.29 Variation of a.c conductivity with frequency for different temperatures (sample FF4).

E'igure4.30 Variation of a.c corlductivity with frequency for different temperatures (sample FC1).

~igure4.31 Variation of a.c conductivity with frequency for

different temperatures (sample FC4).

Figure4.32 Variation of a.c conductivity with frequency for different temperatures (sample FA^).

Figure4.33 Variation of a.c conductivity with frequency for different temperatures (sample F A 4 ) .

variation in cat is due to the increase in concentration of Fe203. i-e., due to polaronic hopping. This conduction

mechanism can be discussed as follows. It is now well

accepted that in transition metal oxide containing

glasses, transition metal i'3n must be in more than one

valence state, so that conduction can take place by the

transfer of electron from the low to the high valence

states. In the present glass system containing Fe 0 the 2 3'

ions will be in different localised states and mainly in

Fe2+ state. In these glasses, the conduction may occur by

2 + electrons hopping directly between the occupied (Fe )

3 + and unoccupied (Fe ) sites according to the schematic

representation.

Since in the present work, the glass under study

contains low iron concentration, the above proposed

conduction mechanism may explain the thermally activated

conduction (because of the amorphous nature of the glass),

and in this case the likelihood that a large fraction of

the carrier will be trapped and the potentially high

density of localised states makes it necessary to consider

direct hopping for transport[23,24]. The carrier may be

imagined as spending its time trapped at a particular

localised state and making more or less transition to

neighbouring empty trapsL281.

~t low frequencies the variation of rac was found

to be slightly less compared with that at higher

frequencies. At higher frequencies the hops will become

shorter and, in the limit of interatomic distances, will

no longer be randomly distributed and will settle to a

frequency dependence to = A m s ; 5 > 1 where O = 271f; ac

f is the frequency of the applied alternating field. The

present experimental results on < in this glass system ac

support the idea of hopping of carriers between the iron

ions (Fe 2 + 3+ and Fe ) in the different valence states

following the band model suggested by Austin and Mott[21].

This type of behaviour is well known in amorphous systems

and has been attributed to the distribution of relaxation

times arising from the disorder[49].

From the figure 4.34, it is obvious that increasing

the iron oxide content in the glass system belongs to

series (i) caused an increase in the a.c conductivity.

This may be due to the increased number of electrons

hopping between the states of different valencies. This

type of results which support the idea of hopping

conduction mechanism is reported in oxide glasses

containing transition-metal oxides[28]. Since in this

series of glass samples, the concentration of CaO and

A1203 are kept constant, their contribution in enhancing

the conductivity remains almost same.

Figure4.34 Variation of a.c conductivity with temperature For different concentration of Fe2o3 and . - frequency.

Figure4.35 Variation of a.c conductivity with temperature for different concentration of CaO and frequency.

Figure4.36 Variation of a.c conductivity with ternperatvre for different concentration of A I Z O j 2nd frequency.

In the present study it is also observed from

figure 4.35 and 4.36 that a.c conductivity increases

with the concentration of CaO and A1203 in the 2nd and 3rd

series of glass system respectively. This may be due to

2+ . the increased ionic conductivity by the Ca Ions and the

non-bridging oxygens.

4.10. Conclusion

Ca0-B203-A1203-Fe 0 2 3

glasses containing different

concentration of Fe 0 CaO and A1203 were prepared. The 2 3'

variation of dielectric constant and a.c conductivity with

frequency, concentrations of Fe203, CaO and A1203 were

studied over a temperature range 300 to 425 K. The value

of real part of the dielectric constant was found to

decrease with the frequency and increases with

temperature. Also values of rac was found to be

dependent on the concentration of the constituents and the

frequency.

References

1. Owen A.E. and Robertson J.M., J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 4, 208 (1.970).

2. Kitao M., Araki F. and Yamada S., Phys. Stat. ~olidi, 37, K 119 (1976).

3. Lakatos L.I. and Abkowitz M., Phys. Rev., B 8, 1791 (1971).

4. Bishop S.C., Taylor P.C., Mitchell D.L. and Sack L.H., J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 5, 351 (1971).

5. Linsley G.S., Owen A.E. and Hayatec F.N., J. Non- Cryst. Solids, 4, 228 (1970).

6. Sayer M., Mansingh A., Reyes A. and Rosenblatte J.M., J. Appl. Phys., 42, 2857 (1971).

7. Thurzo I., Baromock B. and Donpovcc J., J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 28, 177 (1978).

8. Sayer M. and Mansingh M., Phys. Rev. 86, 4629 (1972).

9. Bottyer H. and Brykein V.V., Phys. Stat. Sol.(b), 78, 415 (1976).

10. Charls R.J., J. Appl. Phys., 32, 1115 (1961).

11. Tomozawa in: Treatise on Materials Science, ed. Hanney H. (Academic Press, New York) (1977).

12. Kaaamura J. and Shimoji M., J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 79, 367 (1986).

13. Dyre J.C., Phys. Lett., 108 A , 457 (1985).

14. Abelard P. and Baumard J.P., Solid State Ionics, 14, 61 (1984).

15. Ishii T., Pro. Theor. Phys., 73, 1084 (1985).

16. Schmid A.P., J. Appl.. Phys., 39, 3140 (1968).

17. Munakata M., Solid State Electron, 1, 159 (1960).

Landsberger F.R. and Bray P.J., J. Chem. Phys., 53, 2757 (1970).

Morin, Phys. Lett., 3, 34 (1959).

Mott N.F., J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 1, 1 (1968).

Austin 1.G and Mott N.F., Adv. Phys., 18, 41 (1969).

Mackenzie J.D., in "Modern Aspects of the V ~ ~ K ~ O U S State", edited by Mackenzie J.D., Butterworths, London p.126 (1965).

Owen A.E., Contemp. Phys., 11, 257 (1970).

Mansingh A., Reyes J.M. and Sayer M., J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 7, 76 (1972).

Mansingh A., Tandon R.P. and Vaid J.K., Phy. Rev., 21, 4829 (1980).

Murauski L., Phil. Mag., 50, L69 (1984).

Bogomolova L.D, Classova M.P., Kalygina V.M., Reiman S.I., Spsibkina S.N. and Filatova I.V., J. Non- Cryst. Solids, 85, 170 (1986).

Saleh C1.N. and Gawish M.M., J. Appl. Phys. 51, 459 (1980).

Duran A., Jurado J.R. and Fernandez N.J.M., J. Non- Cryst. Solids.

Hassan M.A., Hogarth C.A. and Moridi G.R., Phys. Stat. Sol. (a), 101, 537 (1987).

Muhammed Osman A.E., Hassan M.A. and Hogarth C.A., J. Efater. Sci., 24, 3560 (1989).

Lynch G.F. and Sayer M. J. Appl. Phys., 42, 2587 (1971).

Th. Van Gemert W.J., vas Ass. H.M.J.M. and Stevels J . M . , J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 16, 281 (1974).

Abelard P. and Barnard J.F., Solid State Ionics, 14, 61 (1984).

Taylor H.E., Part I J. Soc. Glass Tech., 41, 350 (1957). Part I1 J. Soc. Glass Tech., 43, 124 (1959).

Charles R.J., J. Appl. Phys. 32, 1115 (1961).

Barton J.L., Veres et Refr., 20, 328 (1966).

Kawamura J., Sato R., Mishina S. and Shimoji M., Solid State Ionics, 25, 155 (1987).

Bottelberghs P.H., in: Solid Electrolytes, eds., Hagen Muller P. and Van Cool W., Academic Press, N.Y. (1978).

Huang P., Huang X. and Gam F., J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 112, 318 (1989).

Tarsikka P.S. and Singh B., J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 124, 221 (1990).

Brahim E. and Malika O., Phase ~ransitions, 12, 121 (1988).

S ~ y t h C.P., "Dielectric Behaviour and Structure", p.132, Mc Graw Hill, New York (1955).

Pandit A.K, Singh R.K., Ansari T.H., Singh R.A. and Wanklyn B . N . , J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 54, 769 (1993).

Hassan A.M., Hagarth C.A. and Moridi G.R., Phys. Stat. Solidi (a), 101, 537 (1987).

Kinqerv W.D., Bowen H.K. and Uhlman D.R. w~nfroduction to Ceramics", John-Willey and Sons, N.7 11976).

Huang Pengnian and Huang Xihuai, J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 112, 318 (1989).

Owen A.E. and Robertson J.M., J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 2, 40 (1970).

Mansingh A., Tandon R.T. and Valid J.D., J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 36, 1267 (1975).

Pike G.E., Phys. Rev., 6B, 1572 (1972).

Springlett B.R., J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 15, 179 (1974).

52. ~lliot S.R., Phil. Mag., 36, 1291 (1977).

53. Mott N.F. and Daris E.A., "Electronic Processes in on-Crystalline Materials", Oxford , Clarendon (1971).

54. Bottger M. and Bryksin, Phys. Stat. Sol., B9, 78 (1976).

55. Pollak M. and Gebalte T.H., Phys. Rev., 122, 1742 (1961).

56. Johnscher A.K., J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 8, 293 (1972).

57. Elliot S.R., Physics of Amorphous Materials, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., N.Y., p.412 (1984).

CHAPTER 5

LASER RAMAN STUDIES ON QUARTERNARY GLASS SYSTEMS

CaO-B2Qd1203-Na20 AND Ca0-6203-Al203-Fe203

CHAPTER 5

LASER RAMAN STUDIES ON QUARTERNARY GLASS SYSTEM

Ca0-B203-A1 O-Na 0 AND Ca0-B203-A1203-Fe203 2 3 2

5.1. Introduction

Amorphous materials are characterized by the absence

of long-range order in the arrangement of atoms and their

structure is generally described in terms of a short-range

order. Structural studies of glasses have been carried

out using different experimental techniquesll-51. Laser

Raman spectroscopy has been widely used for the

investigation of structure of different types of

glasses[6-lo]. Particularly, a number of investigations

on borate glasses have been reported[ll-151. A

comprehensive review of Ranan studies on borate glasses

has been published by ~onijnendilk and Stevels[ll]. Very

recently, Meera and Ramakrishna have reviewed the later

studies on these type of glasses[l2].

In this chapter, the author presents laser Raman

studies on the quarternary glass systems CaO-B 0 -A1203- 2 3

Na20 and CaO-B 0 -A1 0 -Fe 0 2 3 2 3 2 3 ' A brief review of the

Raman studies on borate glasses is also included in this

chapter.

5.2. A Short Review

As pointed out by Konijnendijk et al.[ll], the

interpretation of Raman spectra of borate glasses is not

straight forward and usually information on the structural

units present in different glass systems is obtained by

comparison of the Raman spectra of the glasses with those

of borate compounds whose crystal structure is known.

This is based on the assumption that structural units or

groups in glasses resemble the units or groups in

comparable compounds[ll,l3]. The structure of glasses has

been the topic of many theoretical investigation[l4,151.

Two basic approaches viz., random network

hypothesis[l6,17] and the crystallite model[l7] have been

proposed for the description of structure of disordered

naterials[l2]. According to the first hypothesis the

fundamental polyhedra present in crystals (eg., Si04 in

S i 0 2 crystals) exist as such as in the corresponding

qlasses. These polyhedra are connected together by

allowing sone degree of bond angle distortion and more or

less complete freedom for value of dihedral angles. This

theory has been applied with considerable success to

explain the structure of amorphous Si, Ge and As.

According to the second hypothesis a glass consists of

subnicroscopically ordered regions which are connected

together by a disordered structure. But this model does

not enjoy much experimental support[l21.

The structure of borate glasses is best described by

the group model primarily suggested by Krog-Moe[l8]. This

model is based on the assumption that structural units or

groups present in oxide melts or oxide glasses resemble

the units or groups present in the corresponding

crystalline compound. In the analysis of Raman spectra of

borate glasses, the Raman spectra of crystalline compounds

are used as the finger prints for the identification of

specific groups in the corresponding glasses. The

different types of borate groups presently known are given

in figure 1.10 (Chapter 1)[11]. The structural and

physical properties of B203 glasses have been investigated

by many workers[ll,l9-301. The main feature of the Raman

spectrum of B203 glasses is a narrow, intense and

strongly polarized band centered at 806 ~m-~[25,25a,16,33].

Mozzie and Warren[31] from X-ray diffraction experiments

have shown that vitreous B203 is primarily built up of

boroxol ring which are linked together, and a small

number of B03 unit, which are not part of the boroxol

rings, linked randomly to the boroxol groups. This was

also suggested by other workers[Zla]. This conclusion was

based on the fact that the strongest peak in the Raman

Spectra of B203 glasses at 806 cm-I coincide with a

strong Raman peak in several boroxol derivatives. Since

this peak is strongly polarized it must be due to a

totally systematic vibration. Parsons[32] and Krogh-

Moe[21 ] attributed this peak to a trigonal deformation of

the boroxol ring. This suggestion has also been supported

by the theoretical calculation of the vibrational spectra

of boroxol groups with different groups attached to the

boroxol ring[33]. In contrast with the Raman spectrum of

Vitreous B 0 the Ranan spectrum of crystalline B 0 does 2 3' 2 3

not have a peak at 806 cm-I indicating the absence of

boroxol rings[34]. Crystal structure of crystalline B2°3

has been shown to consist of BO triangles and not boroxol 3

rings[35].

The Raman spectra of B203 glasses have also been

reported to be characterized by a weak and broad band

centered around 1260cm-1[22,28,29,30]. This band has been

reported to be originating from the delocalized B-0

stretch involving both the ring and network

contribution[28]. The band has the characteristics of a

Continuous Random Network (CRN) mode[30] indicating that

B203 glass is made up of continuous random network of

boroxol rings.

The Raman spectra of vitreous B 0 undergo pronounced 2 3

change on the addition of other oxides like alkali oxide,

alkaline earth oxide, combination of alkali oxides and

alkaline earth or A1203. The Raman spectra of binary

alkali borate glasses: x R 0-(1-x)B 0 (R=Li, Na, K, Rb, 2 2 3

Cs) containing upto 70 mol% of alkali oxide have been

extensively studied by many researchers[11,23,26,36-431.

The Raman spectra of alkali borate glasses containing

different alkali ions show a close resemblance[ll,l21.

The nost prominant characteristic of binary alkali borate

glasses for low concentration of alkali oxide is the peak

at 806 cm-l. Upon increasing the alkali oxide content the

intensity of this peak of 806cm-1 decreases and a new

peak starts developing at about 770cm-I. At 20 mol% of

alkali oxide the 806cm-' peak appears only as a shoulder

of 770 cm-' peak and in the case of sodium and cesium

borate glasses the 806 cm-' peak completely disappears at

a concentration of 25 mol% of the alkali oxide[ll,l2]. As

the alkali oxide concentration increases beyond 30 mol%,

the peak at 770 cm-' shifts towards lower frequency. At

alkali oxide concentrations in the range 20-35 mol%, the

strongest peak is observed in the range 770-755 cm-I.

Since 806 cm-' peak is characteristic of the boroxol

group, it is obvious that on the addition of alkali oxide

to boron oxide, the boroxol groups are converted into

other groups. Also, the disappearance of the 806 cmbl

peak at about 25 mol% of alkali oxide indicates that

vitreous boron oxide structure is not made up of random

network of B 0 3 triangles, since at 25 mol% alkali oxide

not all these B03 triangles with three bridging oxygen

ions can be converted into other types of groups[lll.

Frorn the studies of binary sodium and potassium borate

glasses, Konijnendijk[ll] has shown that the peak which

arises at about 770 cm-I is due to a symmetric breathing

vibration of a six-membered borate ring with one B04

tetrahedra[24]. Through a comparison of the Raman spectra

of sodium and potassium borate glasses containing 20 mol%

alkali oxide with the spectra of various alkali borate

compounds, Konijnendijk has concluded that tetraborate

groups, that is, a couple consisting of one pentaborate

and one triborate group are formed in the concentration

range 0-20 mol% alkali oxide at the expense of boroxol

rings. This conclusion was also confirmed by IR spectra,

X-ray analysis, NMR studies and melting point

depressions[18,24,44,45].

Konijnendijk has also concluded that in the

composition range 20-35 mol% alkali oxide, the tetraborate

groups are gradually replaced by diborate groups upon

increasing the alkali oxide content. At about 33 mo18 of

alkali oxide, the network is built up mainly of diborate

groups with minor number of loose BO triangles, loose BO 3 4

tetrahedra with ring-type metaborate groups probably also

present. This picture has also been confirmed by the NMR

measurements of Rhee and Bray[45]. Konijnendijk has

assigned the peak at 7 5 5 cm-l to diborate groups. Raman

spectra of alkali borate glasses with high alkali content

-1 contain a peak at 755 cm . Bri1[24] has attributed this

peak to the presence of dipentaborate groups which result

from the incorporation of a second B04 tetrahedron into a

pentaborate group. (i.e.. this peak arises out of the

presence of groups containing two BO tetrahedra). For 4

still higher concentration of alkali oxide, loose diborate

and loose BO groups giving rise to a peak around 500 cm - 1 4

-1 . are also formed. The peak at 5 6 0 cm in the case of

alkali concentration of about 50 mol% has not been

conclusively assigned by Konijnendijk, though he

tentatively assigned the peak to isolated diborate groups.

The peaks at 630, 730, 8 2 0 and 9 4 0 cm-I in glasses

containing alkali oxide concentration between 4 0 and

50 mol% have been attributed to groups containing non-

4- bridging oxygen viz., pyroborate groups (B205) and

3- orthoborate units (B03) , ring type metaborate and chain

type metaborate groups from a comparative study of spectra

of these glasses with those of compounds containing these

groups[ll]. The presence of a peak at 760 cm-1 in the

spectra of glasses containing upto about 50 mol% of alkali

oxide is attributed to the presence of a significant

number of BO units, probably in diborate groups. 4

Recently the assignments of the peak centered at

755 cm-I by Konijnendijk[ll] has been questioned by Irion

et a1.[37]. ~rogh-Moe[46] and Matinez-Ribll et a1.[41]

studied the Raman spectra of zinc diborate and lithium

diborate which contain diborate groups, and observed no

-1 . peak at 755 cm in the spectrum of either material but

observed peaks around 1050, 980 cm-l for ZnO-2B203 and at

1035, 930 and 980 cm-l for Li20-2B203. It is now well

accepted that diborate groups are identified by the

-1 presence of a peak around 1100 cm [37,41-43,121.

In a very recent review Meera et a1.[12] have indicated

that only the simultaneous occurrence of peaks around 930,

770, 650 and 500 cm-l is a reliable indication of the

presence of pentaborate groups. Thus it appears that in

alkali borate glasses containing upto 25 mol% of alkali

oxide, boroxol rings are converted to pentaborate groups

and not to tetraborate or triborate groups[ll].

Raman spectra of binary borate glasses containing

alkaline-earth ions with general formula RO:B203 for

R=Ba, Ca, Sr, Mg and Pb have been reported[23,40,48,49].

In Raman spectra of 0.20 Ba0-0.80 B 0 the most prominant 2 3'

- 1 peak is the one at 775 cm and peak at 806 cm - 1 is

totally absent. This indicates that in this glass no

boroxol groups are present and all the BaO is used for the

formation of B04 units. It may be thought that the B04

tetrahedra are connected to each other, so that one Ba 2 +

ion can compensate for the negative charge of two B04

units close to one another[ll,l2]. It has been concluded

that it is reasonable to consider the borate network in

the 0.20 Ba0-0.80 B 0 glasses to be consisting primarily 2 3

of tetraborate groups[l2]. The peaks at 930, 650 and

485 cm-1 in the Raman spectra of this glass show the

existence of pentaborate groups. In Raman spectra of

binary glasses containing 30 mol% alkaline-earth (Ba, Ca,

- 1 Sr), the most prominent peak appears at around 755 cm

showing close similarity to the Raman spectra of alkali

borate glasses. However, in the Raman spectra of 30 mol%

barium and calcium borate glasses the high frequency band

a2pears to be more intense and occurs at a lower

- 1 frequency (1300 cm ) than in the alkali borate

glasses[l2]. Detailed study of the glass system x MgO-

(100-x) B 2 0 3 over its glass forming region has been

reported[40,121. The prominent peaks for different values

- 1 - 1 of x are at 806 cm and 785 cm for x > 44.4 mol$, and

785 cm-' and 690 cm-l for x=50 mo1%[12]. Raman studies of

binary borate glasses containing cations other than

alkaline earths have been reported in systems RO-B 0 with 2 3

R = Cd, Pb, Bi, Zn, Si and Ge[48,50,51,52,53,54]. In

cadmium borate glasses, the 806 cm-' peak due to boroxol

rings is present for glasses containing as much as 42.8

mol% CdO. Also the spectrum contains a peak centered

- 1 around 775 cm , which decreases in intensity and shifts

to lower frequency as the CdO content increases. The

simultaneous presence of peaks at 775, 945, 640 and

510 cm-' indicates the presence of pentaborate groups in

these glasses. The shift towards lower frequency of the

775 cm-l peak with increase in the concentration of CdO

shows the formation of dipentaborate groups. The band

- 1 around 1100 cm corresponding to the diborate groups is

present in the spectrum for the range of comp~sition from

33.3 mol% to 52.4 mol% of Cd0[48,12]. CdO is both a

network former and a network modifier. The slower

consumption of boroxol rings in cadmium borate glasses is

due to the formation of diborate groups (i.e., groups with

connected BO units) as well as due to incorporation of 4

CdO in the network as network former. An interesting

feature of the cadmium borate glasses is the presence of

- 1 the intense high frequency band centered around 1390 cm

which is assigned to B-0 vibrations occuring in large

borate network[12,48,55]. The high intensity of this band

suggests that the CdO is less capable (compared to alkali

and magnesium ions) of breaking the network into smaller

groups like pyroborate and orthoborate but results in the

formation of non-bridging oxygens connected to large

borate network[l2,48].

The Raman spectra of xZnO- (100-x) B203 for x between

50 and 65 mol% show no significant changes with increase

in the ZnO concentration[l2,51]. The spectra consists

only of broad bands and the nature of the spectra does not

improve on annealing the glasses[l2]. The Raman results

support the network forming tendency of ZnO but its role

in network modification is not clearly known[l2].

The replacement of an alkali oxide by another alkali

oxide in borate glasses is reported to cause a non linear

variation in their physical properties. This effect known

as mixed alkali effect has also been reported in the Raman

study of glasses[56]. The ratio of the intensity of the

-1 , 770 cm peak to that of 806 cm-' peak is observed to be

greater in the binary calcium borate glasses than in the

binary lithium borate glasses[56]. But, when LiZO is

replaced by Cs20, the intensity ratio I 770/~806

does not

vary linearly. For a given amount of total alkali content

a distinct minimum is observed in the 1770/1806

v s

CS O/(CS20 + Li20) behaviour. The result has been 2

explained on the basis of weak electrolyte mode1[57,581.

According to this model, mixed alkali effect is due to the

preferential formation of mixed alkali pairs resulting in

the formation of non-bridging oxygens. The formation

of non-bridging oxygens destroys the six membered rings

resulting in the decrease of 770 cm - 1 peak[12,561. The

Raman spectra of ternary glass system Ca0-Na20-B203 iS

reported to be similar to that of binary sodium borate

containing the same amount of B 0 [59]. But the behaviour 2 3

of Mg0-Na20-B 0 glass is reported to be different[40,59]. 2 3

Another important glass system reported to have been

studied using Raman spectroscopy in ternary systems

containing A1 0 2 3' The effect of incorporation of A1203 in

alkali and alkaline-earth borate glasses has been

investigated by many workers[ll,601. In glasses of

composition 20 K20-80 B203, incorporation of A1203 of

concentration from 10 to 20 mo18 results in an increase of

the intensity of the 806 cm-I band and a decrease of the

-1 . peak at 770 cm in the Raman spectra. Addition of

20 mol% of A1 0 results in the disappearance of 770 cm - 1 2 3

peak. This indicates that the addition of A1203 leads to

a decrease in the number of BO tetrahedra, and boroxol 4

groups are formed again. A1203 is probably incorporated

in the structure as A10 units. The oxygens of Na 0 do 4 2

not convert B03 units to BO units but get used up for the 4

formation of A104 tetrahedra[ll,60]. However, no Raman

peaks corresponding to A104 tetrahedra are observed in the

Raman spectra[ll,60]. Similar results have also been

reported for Mg0.A1203.B203 glasses[ll]. Raman studies of

ternary alkali borosilicate and borogermanate glasses have

also been reported [11,61,62].

Raman spectra of quarternary glasses have not been

extensively studied. The latest review of Raman studies

of borate glasses does not indicate such studies on

quarternary glasses.

5.3. Work Undertaken in the Present Study

The author reports the study of Raman spectra of the

quarternary glass systems Na 0-CaO-B 0 -A1203 and Fe203- 2 2 3

CaO-B 0 -A1203 2 3 in this chapter. It was found that the

Raman scattering is poor in the Ca0-B203-A1 0 -Fe 0 2 3 2 3

glass system. The effects on the Raman bands of the

variations in the concentrations of Na20, CaO, A1203 and

Fe203 were investigated. For comparison,the laser Raman

spectrum of cabal glass CaO-B 0 -A1203 had also been 2 3

recorded. The band corresponding to the boroxol units at

- 1 806 cm [11,12] is absent in the spectra of the glass

system Ca0-B203-A1 0 -Na 0 2 3 2 while weak scattering

corresponding to this band is present in some of the

spectra of the glass system CaO-B 0 -A1 0 -Fe 0 2 3 2 3 2 3 - But

peaks corresponding to other borate groups viz.,

pentaborate, diborate, etc. are present in all the

spectra.

5.4. Experimental Details

The procedure for the preparation of the samples are

described in Section 3.7 of Chapter 3. Glass samples of

thickness about: 1 m were chosen for the Raman studies.

The spectra were recorded at room temperature in the

stokes region using Dilor Z 24 Raman spectrometer using

the 488 nm line of the A=+ laser as the exciting

radiation and with a power of about 70 mW incident on the

samples. The scattered radiation was measured at an angle

of 90° from the incident laser beam.

5.5. Results and Discussion

The laser Raman spectrum of the cabal glass CaO-B203

A1203 and the spectra of the glass systems Ca0-B203-A1203-

Na20 and CaO-B 2 3 0 -A1 2 3 0 -Fe203 for different concentrations

of the components are shown in figure 5.1 to 5.13. The

spectra of the different systems of glasses are discussed

in the following sections.

(i) Ca0-B203-A1203 (cabal) glass system

The laser Raman spectrum of the cabal glass system

for a typical composition of 20Ca0-65B 0 -15A1203 is shown 2 3

in figure 5.1. The most prominent feature of the spectrum

-1 is the broad band centered around 795 cm . It has been

reported[11,20,21,29] that the most prominent feature of

the Raman spectrum of vitreous B 0 is a sharp band 2 3

centered around 806 cm-1 and that when an alkali oxide is

added to B203, the intensity of the peak at 806 cm-1

- 1 decreases and another peak develops at 770 cm . The

806 cm-I peak disappears for alkali oxide concentration of

about 20 mol%. The 806 cm-l peak has been assigned to

boroxol rings by Bril et a1.[24] and others[ll,l2]. In

the present study the peak at 795 cm-1 which is close to

- 1 806 cn may be assigned to boroxol rings. Konijnendijk

had assigned at 770 cm-l to tetraborate groups formed at

the expense of boroxol rings. But the assign ment of the

770 crn-I peak to tetraborate groups has been indicated to

be ambiguous by Meera et a1.[12]. These authors have

pointed out that both triborate and tetraborate groups

give rise to the 770 cm-I band and a weak band at 930crn-I

but no band in the 660 crn-1 -1 region. Hence the 770 cm

band alone cannot be taken to indicate the presence of a

particular groups. Meera et a1.[12] has also indicated

that the simultaneous occurance of peaks around 930, 770,

650 and 500cm-I is a reliable proof of the presence of

sentaborate group. In the present study, the band around

-1 940 Cm-l, 480cm-1 and the shoulder around 770cm together

-1 with noticeable scattering around 650 cm may be

attributed to pentaborate groups. From the prominance of

-1 . the peak at 795 cm it may be inferred that the structure

of the glass is made up of a continuous random network of

boroxol rings . It may also be inferred that the boroxol

rings have started transformation into pentaborate group

at the composition 20Ca0-65B 0 -15A1203. 2 3 ~ r f i [241 had

-1 shown that a peak around 500 cm corresponds to loose

diborate and loose B04 groups. In figure 5.1 the broad

-1 peak centered around 480 cm which is close to 500 cm -1

may be considered to be an indication of these groups.

The peaks around 1100cm-~ may be attributed to diborate

groups in conparison with reported results[12,37,41-431.

The band centered around 1436 cm-I may be assigned to

B-0 vibrations occuring in large borate network in

comparison with the band around 1390 cm-l in cadmium

borate[52,59] and other borate glasses[l2]. It has been

reported that Raman spectra of binary borate glass system

RO:B203 (R= Ba,Ca,Sr) containing about 30 mol% of RO, are

dominated by a band at 755 cn-1 due to dipentaborate

qrouss. In the present study even though the combined

concentration of CaO and A1203 exceeds 30 mol%, there is

no identifiable band but only a weak scattering around

755 cra - 1 indicating the lack of a large percentage of

dipentaborate groups.

In comparison with the reported spectra of binary and

ternary glasses[ll,l2], it nay be concluded that the

structure of the cabal glass with composition 20Ca0-

65B 0 -15A1203 consists mainly of a continuous random 2 3

network of boroxol rings. Small percentages of pentaborate

and diborate groups and loose diborate and loose B04

groups are also present in the glass. The broad peak of

- 1 appreciable intensity around 1436 cm is a strong

indication of continuous random network. The addition of

CaO and A1203 (total concentration 35 mol%) does not

break the network into smaller groups like pyroborate and

orthoborate. This factor may be considered to be

contributing to the large intensity of the 795 cm-l peak

(which is closed to 806 cm-l) in the present study.

(ii) Ca0-B203-A1 0 -Na 0 glass system 2 3 2

(a) Variation of concentration of Na 0 2

The Raman spectra of the quartenary glass system

CaO-B 0 -A1203-Na20 for two different concentrations of 2 3

Na20 (15 and 24 111018) are given in figure 5.2 and 5.3. The

most prominent peak in the spectrum for lower concentration

of Ma20 is a broad and intense peak centered around

783 cm-I where as this peak around 778 cm -1 has much

lower intensity in the spectrumof the glass with higher

concentration of Na20. In the present study it may be

inferred that the glass of composition 10Ca0-60B203-

15A1203-15Na20 is mainly built up of tetraborate groups

and as the concentration of Na 0 is increased to 24 mol%, 2

the tetraborate groups convert to diborate groups. The

- 1 much reduced intensity of the 778 cm band in the

spectrum for larger concentration of Na20 (figure 5.3)

clearly shows that the glass is not made up of mainly

tetraborate groups.

Meera et a1.[12] have reported that the presence of

pentaborate groups may be concluded from the simultaneous

occurance band at 770, 930 and 616 cm-l along with the

-1 considerable scattering in the 500 cm region. In

figure 5.2 the shoulder around 770 cm-l, in the band

centered around 915 cm-' (close to 930cm-I) and the weak

band at 673 (close to 666) cm-I along with considerable

scattering around 481 cm-I may be considered to be an

indication of pentaborate groups. In figure 5.3 the

- 1 scattering in the region 472 cm is the most prominent

feature of the spectrum and this along with appreciable

-1 scattering around 770 cm and 670 cm-1 and the band

-1 centered around 918 cm may be interpreted as an

indication of the predominance of pentaborate group in the

structure of the glass containing larger mol% of

Na20 (24 mol%). In comparison with the reported

results[l6,17] the weak bands around 1000 cm-I in

figure 5.2 and that around 1040 cm-' in figure 5.3 may be

assigned to diborate group which night have resulted from

the conversion of a few tetraborate group to diborate

group. The bands around 481 cm-I in figure 5.2 and

472 cm-1 in figure 5.3 when interpreted independently

(from the band at 783, 915 and 673) leads to the

conclusion that the glass system with the lower (15 mol%)

as well as higher (24 mol%) Na 0 concentration contain 2

loose diborate group and loose B04. The high frequency

band around 1443 cm-I -1 for lower and around 1436 cm for

higher concentration Na 0 indicate the presence of B-0 2

vibrations occuring in a large borate network[ll,l21. The

lower intensity of the high frequency band shows that at

higher concentration (24 mol%) of Na20 smaller groups

such as pyroborate and orthoborate are predominently

present in the structure of the glass.

Comparing figure 5.2 and 5.3 with figure 5.1 it may

seen that the addition of a fourth component (Na20 in

this case) does not affect the structure of the glass to

a great extent.

(b) Variation of concentration of CaO

The spectra for the glass system CaO-B 0 -A1203-Na20 2 3

containing two differnt concentrations of CaO are given in

figure 5.4 and 5.5. For lower CaO content (5 mol%) the

most prominant feature of the spectrum (figure 5.5) is a

narrow band around 798 cm-l. This band is very close to

band corresponding to the boroxol rings ( 806 cm-l) and

hence indicates the predominance of the boroxol rings in

the structure of glass. A band around 770 cm-1 also

appears as a shoulder on the low frequency side of the

798 cm-I band indicating that other groups have started

to develop at the expense of boroxol groups. The

- 1 simultaneous presence of shoulder around 770 cm , the

bands around 458 and 650 cm-1 and the weak band around

900 cm-I is an indication of a small percentage of

pentaborate group. The broad peak around 485 cm - 1

indicates the presence of diborate and loose B04

groups[l7]. The band around 1460 cm-I must be due to

delocalized B-0 stretches[l7]. The presence of the weak

band 650 cm-I indicates ring type metaborate groups.

When the concentration of CaO in the glass system is

increased to 15 mol%, conspicuously different features

develop in the spectrum. The most prominent peak is

around 770 cm-1 -1 while there is no peak around 800 cm . Another conspicuous feature of figure 5.5 in comparison

with figure 5.4 is the existence of broad, somewhat

-1 intense peak around 910 cm . The strongest peak at

773 cm-I - 1 together with the peaks around 910 and 473 cm ,

and weak band around 650 cm-1 may be attributed to

pentaborate groups. This clearly shows that as the

concentration of CaO is increased, the boroxol rings

convert into pentaborate group and at a concentration

c 15 mol% of CaO all the boroxol rings have undergone this

transformation. From a comparison of figure 5.4 and

figure 5.5, it may be noted that the features representing

pentaborate groups are stronger for larger concentration

of CaO (figure 5.5) than for smaller concentration

(figure 5.4) which indicates that at larger concentration

of CaO, there is a larger concentration of pentaborate

groups. The peak around 473 cm-l is an indication of the

existence of loose borate and loose BO group[l2]. 4 The

larger intensity of the high frequency peak around

1460 cm-I at higher CaO concentration (figure 5.5) shows

the 8-0 vibrations occuring in a large borate network and

leads to the inference that large concentration of CaO

helps in maintaining the network without breaking into

smaller groups.

( c ) Variation of concentration of A1203

The main features of the spectrum of the glass system

for lower concentration of A1 0 (figure 5.6) are a narrow 2 3

strong peak around 765 cm-l and a broad strong peak

- 1 centerrd around 1473 cm-l. The peak around 765 cm may be

considered to be close to 770 cm-l. The strong band at

- 1 -1 765 cm tosether with bands around 950 and 650 cm , and

-1 the weak band around 500 cm may be attributed to

pentaborate groups. The complete absence of a band around

806 cn-I indicates that complete transformation boroxel

rings into other groups like pentaborate groups has taken

place. It has heen reported that in the case of alkali

borate glasses, the 806 cm-I band completely disappears

at about 25 mol% concentration of alkali oxide. In the

- 1 present case the complete disappearance 806 cm band at a

concentration 5 mol% A1203 in the glass system 10 CaO-

5A1 0 -65B 0 -20Na 0 may be considered to be in agreement 2 3 2 3 2

with the above result con sidering the fact that the

total mol% of additives (35 mol%) to B203 exceeds 25.

Also the broad but strong band around 1473 cm -' is an

indication of the predominance of B-0 vibrations in the

network which also shows that the network is maintained

without breaking into smaller group.

The spectrum (figure 5.7) for larger concentration

A1203 (20 mol$) in the glass system 10 Ca0-50 B 0 - 2 3

20Al 0 -20Na20 appears very much different from that for 2 3

lower concentration of A1 0 (figure 5.6) the strong and 2 3

somewhat sharp band at 772 cm-l is the prominant feature

of the spectrum. The strong bands centered around

466 cm-l, around 950 cm -1 and the strongest band at

-1 -1 772 Cn , and the scattering around 650 cm which

appears as a shoulder on the low frequency side of the

band at 772 cm-l, may be attributed to pentaborate groups.

The prominance of all these bands indicates the strong

concentration of pentaborate groups in the spectrum. The

strong, broad band around 1420 cm-I is assigned to B-0

vibrations occuring in large borate network. The strong

-1 band around 465 cm also indicates the presence of loose

diborate and loose BO groups. Thus comparing figures 5.6 4

and 5.7 with the spectrum cabal glass (figure 5.1) it is

seen that in the glass system containing A1203 total

conversion of boroxol groups into pentaborate groups has

taken place. In addition it may be inferred that the

borate network is maintained without breaking into smaller

groups like pyroborate and orthoborate groups in the glass

system containg A1 0 2 3 '

(iii) CaO-B 0 -A1 0 -Fe o glass system 2 3 2 3 2 3

In the Raman scattering experiments it was found

that the scattering of glasses containing Fe 0 is very 2 3

poor. Hence Raman spectra of glasses containing only low

concentration of Fe 0 had been recorded in the present 2 3

study.

(a) Variation of concentration of Fe 0 2 3

The laser Raman spectra of the glass system CaO-B o - 2 3

A1 0 -Fe203 for two different concentration of Fe203 are 2 3

given in figure 5.8 and 5.9. The spectrum of the samples

for lower concentration (2 mol%) of Fe 0 2 3

(figure 5.8)

consists of bands around 795, 442 and 1305 cm-l. Also weak

scattering is present in the regions around 650 and

- 1 -1 900 cm . The band around 795 cm which is close to the

- 1 band corresponding to boroxol ring (806 cm ) indicates

the predominance of boroxol rings in the structure of the

glass. The somewhat strong and broad band around 442 cm -1

indicates the presence of loose diborate and loose B04

groups. The broad band around 1305 cm-' may be assigned to

delocalized B-0 stretches occuring in large borate

- 1 network. The shoulder around 770 cm and the band around

442 cm-I together with weak scattering around 650 and

- 1 950 crn may be considered asthe proof of the presence of

a small concentration of pentaborate groups in the glass

structure. From the presence of bands around 795 and

1305 cm-1 it may be inferred that the structure of the

glass conslsts of continuous random network of boroxol

rings[ll,l2].

For larger concentration of Fe 0 the scattering was 2 3

found to be very weak. In the spectrum in figure 5.9 the

peak around 795 cm-l has almost disappeared and a new,

very weak peak around 770 cm-' has appeared. Also there

is a weak scattering around 450 cm -1 indicating the

presence of loose diborate and loose B04 groups. Even

though the scattering is poor for the entire range

scanned, the peak showing the characteristic band of a

continuous random network shows up clearly around

1421 cm-l.

(b) Variation of concentration of CaO

The effects of variation of concentration of CaO on

the laser Raman spectra of CaO-B 0 -A1 0 -Fe 0 are shown 2 3 2 3 2 3

in figure 5.10 and 5.11. For lower concentration

(15 mol%) of CaO, the prominent bands are around 801 and

690 cmW1 (figure 5.10). In addition, there is a broad

band around 1325 cm-l. The line around 801 cm-l is very

close to the band corresponding to the boroxol rings and

hence this band indicates the presence of boroxol rings in

the glass. The band around 690 cm-I which is more

- 1 intense than that around 801 cm has to be assigned to

either ring type metaborate (usually around 630 cm-l) or

chain type metaborate (usually around 730 cm-l) which are

observed in binary alkali borate glasses[l7]. Since the

simultaneous occurrence of bands around 930, 770, 650 and

- 1 500 cm alone is a reliable indication of the presence of

the pentaborate groups, the band around 690 cm-l which is

- 1 close to 650 cm cannot be assigned to pentaborate

e cjroups. The broad band cent,red around 1325 cm-1 is

assigned to the delocalized B-0 stretching.

When the concentration of CaO is increased to 24 mol%

noticeable changes occur in the Raman spectra

(figure 5.11). There is a band of appreciable intensity

(though not the most prominent band) around 803 cm-I

indicating the presence of boroxol rings. There is no band

-1 around 700 cm but there exists a band around 532 cm -1

which may be assigned to loose B04 and loose diborate

groups (metaborate groups are not present in this glass

containing larger mol% of CaO). The band around 972 cm-I

nay be considered to be close 1110 cm-1 indicating the

presence of diborate groups. There is also a band around

- 1 1230 cm . From these observations it may be inferred that the variation of CaO does not affect the structure of this

glass which consists of random network of boroxol rings.

(c) Variation of concentration of A1 0 2 3

The effect of variation of A1 0 on the Raman spectra 2 3

of CaO-B 0 -A1 0 -Fe 0 2 3 2 3 2 3 glasses for two different

concentrations of A1 0 are shown in figure 5.12 and 5.13. 2 3

The spectrum of the glass containing lower concentration

(3 mol%) of A1203 shows peaks around 775, 455 and

- 1 1321 cn . Also there is weak scattering around 950 and

-1 -1 . 650 cn . The absence of the 806 cm is an indication of

total conversion of boroxol rings into other groups. The

-1 peak around 775 cm-' (which is close to 770 cm , and

455 cmcl together with weak scattering around 650 and

950 cm-I may be attributed to pentaborate groups. The band

around 455 cm-1 alone is an indication of the presence of

loose BO and loose diborate groups. The prominent peaks 4

around 1321 cm-I is characteristic of a continous random

network.

The spectrum corresponding to the larger

concentration of A1 0 (figure 5.13) is almost similar to 2 3

that in figure 5.12 except that an additional weak peak

- 1 appears around 1034 cm which may be assigned to diborate

- 1 yrou~s[l2]. The band around 777 cm which is close to

-1 - 1 770 cm together with the band around 475 cm and weak

- 1 -1 scattering around 680 cm and 900 cm may be considered

- 1 as an indication of pentaborate groups. The 806 cm peak

is absent in figure 5.13 also showing the non-existence of

- 1 boroxol rings. The peak around 475 cm shows the presence

of loose diborate and loose BO groups as in the case of 4

glass containins lower concentration of A1203. The

evidence for the structure of the glass to be made up of

a continuous ra~dom network is given by the existence of

prominent band around 1332 cm-l. It has been reported in

the case of ternary glasses containing A1203 that addition

- 1 of A1203 to binary alkali borate glasses causes 806 cm

peak to recur. But in the present study it is seen that

-1 the 806 cm peak corresponding to boroxol rings does

not appear even in the glass system of composition 20Ca0-

66B 0 -9A1203-5Fe 0 2 3 2 3'

(iv) General discussion

The laser Raman spectrum of cabal glass 20Ca0-65B203-

15A1203, and the spectra of the quarternary glass

systems Na 0-CaO- B 0 -A1 0 2 2 3 2 3 and Fe 0 -Ca0-B203-A1203

2 3

for different concentrations of the constituents have been

recorded. The spectra have been discussed in the light of

the Krogh-Moe hypothesis and in comparison with the

spectra of reported binary and ternary glass systems. The

structure of vitreous B 0 is a continuous random network 2 3

of boroxol rings. It is seen that in cabal glass

consisting of CaO, B 0 and A1203, the structure is mainly 2 3

built up of random network of boroxol rings, but the

addition of CaO and A1203 to B203 has caused. some

percentage of boroxol rings transform mainly to

pentaborate groups and to a fewer number of other groups

like diborate groups, loose diborate and loose BO groups. 4

The addition of a fourth oxide, Ma2O, is seen to

affect the structure of the ternary cabal glass very much.

Smaller concentration (15 mol%) of Na20 is found to cause

a convertion of boroxol rings to pentaborate groups while

a larger concentration (24 mol%) causes almost complete

conversion of the boroxol groups to pentaborate groups and

a fewer number of other groups like diborate, loose

diborate and loose B04 groups. The variation of

concentration of CaO in the quarter nary glass system Na 0 2

-CaO-B 0 -A1 0 is found to have a profound influence on 2 3 2 3

the structure of the glass. When the concentration of CaO

is small ( 5 mol%) the structure is found to be mainly

built up of boroxol groups while at a larger concentration

(15 mol%) boroxol groups have completely converted into

pentaborate groups. The change in the concentration of

A1203 in the glass is also found to influence the

structure of the glass. At lower concentration of A1203

( 5 nol%) the glass structure is found to consist of

mainly pentaborate groups along with appreciable number of

other groups. The scattering of this glass sample is

found to be weak and not to indicate the predominance of a

particular group. But at higher concentration (20 mol%)

of A1203, the spectrum clearly indicates the large

concentration of pentaborate groups in the structure of

the glass.

The spectra of all the glass samples containing

different concentrations of Na20, CaO and A1203 exhibit

clearly the band characteristic of a random network of

the glass.

The addition of Fe203 as the fourth component to the

ternary cabal glass CaO-B O -A1203 badly affects the 2 3

quality of the Raman spectra. The scattering is very poor

for all the samples analysed. At low concentration

( 2 mol%) of Fe203 the structure is found to be mainly

built up of boroxol rings and a fewer number of

pentaborate groups. But as the concentration of Fe203

is increased to 9 mol% the scattering is very poor and the

features of the spectrum indicate that pentaborate groups

are the main constituents of the glass structure. The

variation of concentration of CaO is found not to have

much effect on the structure; the indications from the

spectra point to the predominance of boroxol rings along

with fewer number of other gjroups. The variation of

concentration of A1203 also does not affect the structure

drastically but larger concentration of A1203 is found to

improve the quality of the Raman spectrum. It is found

that the structure of the glass is not altered by the

variation in the concentration of A1 0 and that the 2 3

structure is mainly built-up of pentaborate groups along

with a smaller nxnber of diborate groups, loose diborate

and loose B04 groups. The band characteristic of the

random network of the glass is predominantly present in

the spectra of all the glass samples analysed.

Figure 5.1 Laser Raman Spectrum of 20Ca0-65B203-15A1203 glass

Figure 5.2 Laser Raman Spectrum of 10Ca0-60B203-15Al 0 -15Na20

glass 2 3

Figure 5 - 3 Laser Raman spectrum of 10ca0-51~ o - 1 5 ~ 1 ~ 0 ~ - 2 4 N a ~ o 2 3

glass

Figure 5.4 Laser Raman Spectrum of 5CaO-658 0 -15Al 0 -1SNa20 glass 2 3 2 3

2 -

E 2 4 4 4 p. 0 0

0 W W

1500 1000 500 WAVE NUMBER ( C d )

Figure 5.5 Laser Raman Spectrum of 15Ca0-55B 2 0 3 -15A1203-15Na20

glass

1500 1OOO 500

WAVE NUMBER (C*' )

Figure 5.6 Laser Raman Spectrum of 10Ca0-65B203-5A1 2 0 3 -20Na20 glass

Figure 5.7 L a s e r Raman Spec t rum of 10Ca0-50B203-20A1203-20Na2~ g l a s s

F i g u r e 5.8 L a s e r Raman Spec t rum of 20Ca0-68B 0 -10A1 0 -2FeZOj g l a s s 2 3 2 3

Figure 5.9 Laser Raman Spectrum of 20Ca0-62B 0 -10A1 0 -8Fe203 ylass 2 3 2 3

&

L. N - t.

1500 .

X)o 500

-1 , WAVE NUMBER (cm )

* E- H m Z W b Z H

z 4 x d a

Figure 5.10 Laser Raman Spectrum of 15Ca0-70B 0 -10A1 0 -5Fe203 2 3 2 3 glass

-1 WAVE NUMBER ( ~ 7 n )

Figure 5.11 Laser Raman Spectrum of 2 4 ~ a 0 - 6 1 ~ ~ 0 ~ - 1 0 A 1 ~ 0 ~ - 5 F e ~ O ~

glass

Figure 5.12 Laser Rarnan Spectrum of 20Ca0-728 0 - 3 A 1 0 -5Fe203 2 3 2 3

glass

Figure 5.13 Laser Raman Spectrum of 20Ca0-66B 0 -9A1 0 -5Fe20 glass

2 3 2 3

9 3 I. -4

I. m 3

Is00 loo0

>I H H LI] Z W H Z H

Z

2 x

500 I

WAVE NUMBER (CTI I ' )

5.6. Conclusion

The laser Raman spectrum of the ternary cabal glass

CaO-B 0 -A1 0 and the quarternary glass systems CaO-B 0 - 2 3 2 3 2 3

A 1 0 -Na20 and CaO-B 0 -A1 0 -Fe203 2 3 2 3 2 3 have been recorded.

The spectra have been discussed in the light of reported

spectra of binary and ternary glasses. It is found that

the addition of alkali and other oxides to B 0 2 3

results

in the transformation of boroxol groups, which are the

basic structural units in vitreous B 0 into polyborate 2 3'

groups. The Raman spectra of all the glass samples

analysed in the present study indicate the random nature

of the network of the glass. It is found that Raman

spectroscopy can be effectively made use of in identifying

the structural groups present in the glass.

Reference

1. Sakka S., Kozuka H., Fukumi K. and Miyaji F., J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 123, 176 (1990).

2. Meera B.N., Sood A.K., Chandrabhas N. and Ramakrishna J., J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 126, 224 (1990).

3. Harris I.A., Jnr. and Bray P.J., Phys. and Chem. Glasses, 25, 69 (1984).

4. Govinda Rao, Band Rao K.J, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans., 84(6) 1773 (1988).

5. Prabhakar S., Rao K.J. and Rao C.N.R., Proc. R. Soc. Lond. , 429, 1 (1990).

6. Galeener F.L. and Geissberg, J. de Phys., 43, 343 (1982).

7. Daisuke Katto., J. Appl. Phys., 47, 5344 (1976).

8. Shibatta N.,Horighghi M. and Eadachir, J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 45, 115 (1981).

9. Gan Fuxi, Acta. Optica Sinica, 4, 339 (1984).

10. Chen H., Huang G., Mao H. and Gan F., J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 80, 152 (1986).

11. Konijnendijk W.C. and Stevels J.M., J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 18, 307 (1975).

12. Meera B.N. and Ramakrishna J., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 159, 1 (1993).

13. Maroni V.A. and Cairus E.J., J. Chem. Phys., 52, 4915 (1970).

14. Shcker R. and Ganon R.W., Phys. Rev. Lett., 25 222 (1970).

15. Gaskell P.H., Trans. Faraday Soc., 62 (1966) 1493.

16. Zachariasen W . H . , J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 54, 3841 (1932).

17. Elliot S.R., Physics of Amorphous Platerials (Longman, New York) 1984.

18. Krogh-Moe J., ~hys. Chem. Glasses, 3, 101 (1962).

Kujumjelis J., Z. Phys., 100, 221 (1936).

Goubeau J. and Keller H., 2. Anorg. Chem., 272, 363 (1953).

Krogh-Moe J., Phys. Chem. Glasses, 6, 46 (1965).

Krishnan R.S., Indian J. Pure. Appl. Phys., 9, 916 (1971).

~onijnendijk W.L., Philips Res. Rep. Suppl., No.1, 243 (1975).

Bril T.W., Philips Res. Rep. Suppl., No.2, 111 (1976).

Galeener F.L., Mikkelsen J.C. Jr., Geils R.H. and ~ o s b y W.J, Appl. Phys. Lett., 32, 34 (1978).

Konijnendijk W.L. and Stevels J.M., Borate Glasses - Structure, Properties and Applications (Plenum, New York) 259 (1978).

Furukatra T. and White W.B., Phys. Chem. Glasses, 21, 85 (1980).

Walrafen G.E., Samanta S.R. and Krishnan P.N., J. Chem. Phys., 72, 113 (1980).

Galeener F.L., Lucovsky G. and Mikkelsen J.C. Jr., Phys. Rev., B 22, 3983 (1980).

Windisch C.F. Jr. and Risen W.M. Jr., J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 48, 307 (1982).

Mozzi R.L. and Warren B.E., J. Appl. Cryst., 3, 251 (1970).

Parsons J.L., J. Chem. Phys., 33, 1860 (1960).

Kristiansen L.A. and Krogh-Moe J., Phys. Chem. Glasses, 9, 96 (1968).

Bronswijk J.P. and Strijks E., J. Non-Cryst. Solids. 24, 145 (1977).

Gurr G.E., Montgomery P.W., Knutspm C.D. and Gorres B.T., Acta. Cryst., B 26, 906 (1970).

White W.B., Brawer S.A., Furukawa T., and Mc Carthy G.J., Borate Glasses - Structures, Properties and Applications (Plenum, New York) 281 (1978).

Irion M.M., Couzi A., Levasseur, Reau J.M., and Borethous J.C., J. Solid State Chem., 31, 285 (1980).

Lorosch J., Couzi M., Pelous J., Vacher R., and Levasseur A., J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 69, 1 (19841).

Kamitsos E.I., Karakassides M.A. and Chryssikos G.D., J. Phys. Chem., 90, 4528 (1986).

Kamitsos E.I., Karakassides M.A. and Chryssikas G.D., J. Phys. Chem. 91, 1073 (1987).

Kamitsos E.I., Karakassides M.A., and Chryssikos G.D., Phys. Chem. Glasses, 28, 203 (1987).

Kamitsos E.I. and ~arakassides M.A., Phys. Chem. Glasses, 30, 19 (1989).

Kamitsos E.I., Karakassides M.A. and Chryssikos G.D., Phys. Chem. Glasses, 30, 229 (1989).

Krogh-Moe J., Phys. Chem. Glasses, 3, 208 (1962).

Rhee C. and Bray P.J., Phys. Chem. Glasses, 12, 165 (1971).

Krogh-Moe J., Acta. Cryst., B 24, 179 (1968).

Martinez-Ripou M., Martinez-Carreram S. and Gareia- Blanco S., Acta. Cryst., B 27, 672 (1970).

Chryssikos G.D., Kamitsos E.I. and Risen W.M. Jr., J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 93, 155 (1987).

Komijnendijk W.L. and Ver Weij H., J. An. Ceram. SOC. 59, 193 (1976).

Meera B . N . , Sood A.K., Chandrabhas N. and Ramakrisha J., J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 126, 224 (1990).

55. Meeva B.N., Victor D., ~ u t h u S., Chandrabhas N., Sood A.K. and Ramakrisha J., J. Non-Cryst. Solids (Communicated).

56. Furukawa T. and White W.B., J. Am. Cram. Ere., 64, 443 (1981).

57. Goring R., Kuripp K. and Nass H., Phys. Stat. Solids A , 72, 623 (1982).

C h a k r a b o r t y I . N . a n d C h o u d r a l e R.A. S r . , J . Non- C r y s t . S o l i d s , 8 1 , 7 1 ( 1 9 8 6 ) .

Furukawa T. a n d W h i t e W.B., J . Mater. S c i . , 1 5 , 1 6 4 8 ( 1 9 8 0 ) .

Soppe W . , K l e e r e b e z e r n J. a n d Den H a r t o g H . W . , J. Non-Crys t . S o l i d s , 9 3 , 1 4 2 ( 1 9 8 7 ) .

bloyrnihan C.T. a n d L e s i k a r A . Y . , J. A m e r . C e r a n . SOC. 6 4 , 40 ( 1 9 8 1 ) .

J a i n H . J . , P e t e r s o n N.L., J . Amer. C e r a m . S o c . , 6 6 , 1 7 4 ( 1 9 8 2 ) .

~ o n i j n e n d i j k W.L., Phys . Chem. Glasses, 1 7 , 205 ( 1 9 7 6 1 .

Fukunaga J . a n d O t a R., J. Mon-Cryst . S o l i d s , 9 5 , 9 6 , 2 7 1 ( 1 9 8 7 ) .

Furukawand T. a n d W h i t e W.B., J. Mater. S c i . , 1 6 , 2686 ( 1 9 8 1 ) .

C h a k r a b o r t y I . N . a n d C o n d r a t e R.A. S r . , Commun. Am. Cerarn. S o c . , C-71 ( 1 9 8 3 ) .

CHAPTER 6

ULTRASONIC STUDIES ON Ca0-B203-A1203-Na20

AND Ca0-B203-AI2O3-Fe203 GLASS SYSTEMS

CHAPTER VI

ULTRASONIC STUDIES ON Ca0-B203-A1203-Na20 and

CaO-B 0 -A1203-Fe203 GLASS SYSTEMS 2 3

6.1. Introduction

There is an ever increasing interest in the

measurement of elastic properties of solids using

ultrasonic methods, due to their non-destructive nature.

Elastic and acoustical properties of glasses are

si9nificant from the point of view of their application in

special devicesli]. The main reason for extensive

ultrasonic investigations of solids is the need for

elastic properties of materials like crystals, alloys,

plastics, ceramics, glasses and so on in a variety of

applications. The development of electronic circuits has

resulted in a variety of techniques, ranging in precision

from a per cent to a hundredth of per cent under various

conditions of temperature and pressure. The older static

and dynamic methods of measuring elastic constants of

large samples have gained wide acceptance due to their

simplicity. Among the various newer techniques pulse echo

methods are useful where measurements of highest precision

are needed.

An ultrasonic investigation of solids will help to

understand various solid state phenomena such as grain and

domain boundary effects in metals, ferromagnetic and

ferroelectric materials, the diffusion of atoms, molecules

and vacancies through a solid, the motion of imperfection

such as dislocations as well as the interaction between

the lattice sound vibrations and free electrons in metals

at low temperatures. All these effects are studied by

measuring elastic properties, internal friction properties

and their change with temperature, frequency and applied

electric field[2-41.

The measurement of elastic constants of solids is of

considerable interest and significance to both science and

technology. This measurement yields valuable information

reqarding the forces operative between the atoms or ions

in a solid. Since the elastic properties describe the

mechanical behaviour of materials, this information is of

fundamental importance in interpreting and understanding

the nature of bonding in the solid state. When a material

is subjected to a stress it will get strained and within

the elastic limit stress applied on a material is directly

proportional to strain (Hooke's law). The proportionality

constant relating the stress and strain is the modulus of

elasticity or the elastic constant. Commonly there are

three types of elastic constants[5]. They are (i) Young's

modulus (Y) (ii) Bulk modulus ( K ) and (iii) Rigidity or

shear modulus ( G ) . The Young's modulus relates a

unidirectional stress to the resultant strain. It also

represents the resistance to traction along the axis of a

thin bar or rod. The Bulk modulus ( K ) provides a good

link between the macroscopic elasticity theory and the

atomistic view points such as lattice dynamics. Basically

'l- it relates the pressure with volume st,ain. The shear

modulus (G) shows the relation between shear stress and

shear strain. In addition to the above elastic constants

there is a longitudinal modulus (L ) determined from the

velocity of propagation of longitudinal waves through a

solid. The kinds and number of elastic constants for

non-isotropic solids like crystals have been discussed by

various workers like Huntinqton[6], Nye[7It

Bhagavantam[B], Hearmon[9,10], Federov[ll], Musgrave[l2]

and others, and the use of physical acoustics to study the

properties of solids has been discussed by Mason[13-151.

Amorphous materials like glasses exhibit some unique

properties which are not usually found in other

engineering materials. These materials lack the long-

ranye periodicity in the arrangement of atoms. The study

of the propagation and attenuation of waves in

c,lasses[16,17] is of special and vital significance due to

the observation of anomalous specific heat[l8] and thermal

conductivity at low temperature[l9]. The ever increasing

study of glasses is also due to their anomalous physical

properties apart from practical applications[2]. Inspite

of the immense use of ultrasonic techniques in

understanding the structure and properties of glasses only

a limited number of reports have appeared on such studies.

Ultrasonic studies on binary alkali oxide and other oxide

glasses have been reported. The studies of ternary

glasses are sparse, while on quarternary glasses are

almost totally lacking. A brief review of the latest

ultrasonic studies in binary and ternary glasses is given

in the following section.

6.2. Ultrasonic Investigations in Oxide Glasses - A Brief Review

The ever increasing interest in the investigation of

5lasses is motivated by their widespread practical

application and the fact that they exhibit a number of

anomalous physical properties, which suggest specific

structural singularities that differentiate the glassy

state of matter from the crystalline as well as the

ordinary amourphous state[21. So far, however, a unified

theory of the glassy state of matter has failed to emerge,

and so the specific structure of glasses continue to

be less than fully understood. These specific attributes

are extremely pronounced, in particular, in the acoustical

properties of glasses, primarily in the composition and

temperature dependence of the velocity and absorption of

ultrasonic waves[2,20]. For that reason a great many

publications have been devoted to the investigation of

glasses by ultrasonic methods. A brief review of the

earlier works on ultrasonic studies of inorganic glasses

is given in this section.

Reports on ultrasonics investigations on glasses up

to 1976 have been reviewed by Kul'bitskaya et a1.[20]

In 1985 Kodama[21] reported the elastic properties

of barium borate glasses. By making use of the ultrasonic

pulse echo overlap method, ultrasonic velocities in barium

borate glasses were measured at 298 K over the single

phase composition range. The results of the elastic

constant measurements of the glasses as a function of

composition were discussed with the help of the relation

wv2 2 2 = ( a Vm/ and ) which was derived from the

Sm finite elastic strain theory, where M is the molar mass, V

the velocity of the longitudinal or transverse wave, Urn per

the internal energy unit mole, nH the Lagranqean strain

component specifying the sound wave, and Sm the molar

entropy. Based on this relation, elastic internal

energies per unit mole of the glasses are determined as

functions of composition in relation to the behaviour of

N4r the fraction of boron atoms in tetrahedral

coordination.

Elastic constants and structure of the glass system

Co 0 -P 0 had been determined by Higazy et a1.[21] by the 3 4 2 5

ultrasonic techniques at 15 MHz. They found that Young's,

bulk, shear and longitudinal moduli and the Poisson ratio

are sensitive to the composition of the glass. From the

ultrasonic data obtained, it was found that the glass

system could be divided into three "compositional

regions". This behaviour had been qualitatively

interpreted in terms of the cobalt coordination, crosslink

densities, interatomic force constants and atomic ring

sizes. They also presented a full discussion of effects

of annealing on elastic properties of the cobalt phoskhab

glasses.

Ultrasonic sound velocities behaviour in silver

borate glasses were investigated by Carimi et a1.[23].

They studied the sound velocity of 5 MHz longitudinal and

transverse waves in silver iodide - silver borate glasses

and observed in the 77-430 K temperature range the

presence of dispersive effects, whose contribution

increased with the AgI content. These effects arise from

+ the thermally activated jumps of Ag ions, between nearly

equivalent positions available in the glassy network. The

whole behaviour was explained by the overlap of two

different mechanisms, the relaxational one and the one

coming out from the anharmonicity of the system. This

last effect implies, in a quasi-harmonic approximation, a

linear temperature dependence of the elastic constants in

all the explored ranges.

The velocity and absorption coefficient o f

longitudinal ultrasonic waves of frequency 5 and 10 MHz in

molten glassy Na 0-SiO K 0-SiO and PbO-SiO and molten 2 2' 2 2 2'

Na 0-B 0 and PbO-B 0 were measured by means of the 2 2 3 2 3

pulse-echo method at 300 to 1600 K by Kazuhira

Nagata et a1.[24]. They observed that the velocity of

sound decrease with increasing ternprature and decreased

rapidly near the transition temperature of the glass

system. The mean free path of phonons was also estimated

from the velocity of ultrasonic sound, thermal

conductivity, and specific heat capacity.

The temperature dependence of 15 MHz ultrasonic bulk

wave velocity in the range 4 to 600 K in Moo3-P205 glass

system was reported by Bridge et a1.[25] in 1987. They

concluded that a complete understanding of temperature

gradients of elastic moduli in glasses generally requires

the measurement of both acoustic wave velocity and wave

absorption as a function of temperature, so that the

relaxational contribution to the gradients can be computed

and substrated from the experimental gradients.

Damodaran et al.[26] reported the elastic properties

of lead containing MOO -P 0 glasses using ultrasonic 3 2 5

velocity measurements at 10 MHz. They observed that the

composition dependence of elastic moduli, Poisson's ratio

and the Debye temperature were consistant with a

structural model proposed by Selvaraj et a1.1271.

According to this model lead acts both as a network former

and as a network modifier in different composition

regimes. They suggested that the incorporation of lead

into the network is accompanied by the conversion of

three-connected tetrahedra into four-connected tetrahedra

in the network. Longitudinal and shear velocities were

found to decrease gradually as the concentration of PbO

increased. The results were interpreted with the help of

the structural model proposed by Selvaraj et a1.[27].

Ultrasonic studies and calculation of elastic and

thermodynamic properties of alkaline earth containing

silicate glasses were investigated by Batti et a1.[28].

They made an effort to test the model proposed by

Makishima and Mackenzie[29,30] for the direct calculation

of the Young's modulus of silicate glasses of different

compositions. Batti et a1.[31] also studied the

softening temperature and Debye temperature for the

alkaline earth silicate glasses.

They also reported[32] the attenuation and velocity

measurements of ultrasonic waves in strontium borate

glasses and their elastic properties. They observed a

variation of velocity, attenuation, longitudinal modulus

and coefficient of thermal expansion of the glasses with

the frequency of the ultrasonic waves.

Ultrasonic velocities in Vanadium-barium-borate

glasses were measured at 298 K by making use of the

ultrasonic pulse-echo technique at three frequencies by

Anand Pal Singh et a1.[33]. They calculated the molecular

weight, packing density, mean atomic volume and effective

number of atoms in these glass samples. They also

calculated the longitudinal modulus of elasticity,

internal friction and thermal expansion coefficient with

the help of the ultrasonic propagation velocity. They

observed that the values of ultrasonic velocity and the

dynamic modulus of elasticity exhibit considerable

variation at each frequency due to variation in structure

and composition of the glass. Values of longitudinal

modulus were found to increase with the B203 content and

with the frequency of the ultrasonic waves. The results

of ultrasonic, X-ray and infrared measurements on xBaO-

(0.9-x)B203-0.10Fe203 glasses have been reported recently

by Anand Pal Singh et a1.[34]. They have concluded that

introduction of Fe203 in the matrix of BaO-B 0 softens 2 3

the material and that Fe203 do not enter the boron-oxygen

network but, after dissociation into Fe3+ and 02-, sit in

cavities inside the structure.

Ultrasonic studies in sodium borate glasses were

reported by Sidkey et a1.[35] in 1990. They observed

that ultrasonic velocity increased as the sodium oxide

concentration was increased upto 27.2 mol%. A similar

trend was observed in the case of Young's, bulk and shear

moduli. The increase in velocity was attributed to the

increase in packing density due to a decrease of B203, and

therefore an increase in the B04 groups and consequently

occupation of the intersticies by the alkali ions. They

compared the experimental results with those calculated

theoretically from equation derived by Makishima and

Mackenzie[29,30]. They also studied the boron anomaly and

the results showed that this anomaly should appear at

concentrations of sodium oxide above 28 mol%.

Padake et a1.[36] investigated ultrasonic velocity,

and absorption in ZnO - B203 glasses at 2 MHz frequency

for different temperatures. They observed a peak in the

value of attenuation for all glasses and the velocity was

found to be decreasing with increase of temperature.

Experimental results were explained on the basis of

tunneling defect atom and the structural mechanism which

is totally responsible for the strong absorption in

glasses. Ultrasonic studies in binary zinc borate glasses

xZn0-(1-x) B203 were also reported by Singh et al. in

1992[371. They had calculated the elastic moduli of the

glasses and compared the results with those predicted by

P,lakishima-Machenzie mode1[29,30].

Temperature dependence of velocity of longitudinal

and transverse ultrasonic waves in V 0 -P 0 glass 2 5 2 5

system was investigated by Mukherjee et a1.[381. The

experimental results showed that unlike most of the

glasses having tetrahedrally coordinated structures, '2'5-

'2'5 glasses which contain both tetrahedral and octahedral

structures[39] do not indicate any minimum in the

variation of sound velocity with temperature but instead

show a steady decrease of velocity with a small negative

temperature coefficient.

Recently Kodama[40] reported ultrasonic velocity in

potassium borate glasses as a function of concentration of

K20. They observed a strong dependence of the ultrasonic

velocity on the concentration of K20.

The elastic properties of these glasses were analysed

in terms of the three structural units, on the assumption

that these structural units have their respective elastic

constants. They have shown that the elastic constants of

these structural units are defined on the basis of the

elastic internal energy due to deformation.

Ultrasonic velocity and elastic properties of the

ternary glass system Sr0-Ba0-B203 were reported very

recently by Anand Pal Singh et a1.[41]. They observed that

ultrasonic velocity and acoustic impedance in these

glasses increased with the concentration of strontium

oxide. The role of SrO and BaO (modifier) was shown to be

diametrically opposite to their role in silicate glasses.

The elastic moduli of these glasses were obtained making

use of Makishima and Mackenzie mode1[29,30].

6.3. Theory

The ultrasonic velocity in solids yields the

appropriate elastic modulus of the mode being propagated.

The relation can be expressed as

Where P is the density of the solid and M is the

apgropriate combination of the elastic moduli of the

solid. The combination depends on the mode of

propagation, and the mode in turn depends on the

interaction of the wave with the boundaries of the solid.

Since solids can sustain shearing strains elastically,

they will support the propagation of waves with transverse

as well as longitudinal particle motion. The moduli of

materials are influenced by many physical phenomena which

may in turn be studied by measuring the ultrasonic wave

velocities.

Within the elastic limit, majority of solids obey

Hooke's law which states that stress is directly

proportional to strain. Then,

Where p is the normal (tensile) stress and is the

strain. E is the moduli of elasticity. Similarly the

shear stress 1 is directly proportional to the shear

strain.

where G is the modulus of elasticity in shear. When a

sample is extended in tension, there is an accompanying

decrease in thickness; the ratio of the thickness

decrease to the length increase in the Poisson's ratio 6

where A d and ~l are the change in thickness and length,

and d and 1 are original thickness and length

respectively.

Poisson's ratio relates the Young's modulus and shear

modulus by the following equation.

This relationship is only applicable to an isotropic

body in which there is only one value for the elastic

constant independent of direction. Generally this

equation is a good approximation for glasses and for most

polycrystalline ceramic materials.

Under conditions of isotropic pressure the applied

pressure P is equivalent to a stress of -P in each

principal directions. In each principal direction, we

have a relative strain.

The relative volume change is given by

The Bulk modulus K defined as the isotropic pressure

divided by the relative volume change is given by

The elastic constants of the solids are calculated

from the measured densities and the velocities of

longitudinal (VL) and transverse (Vs) ultrasonic waves 5 ,

using the following expressions[$2].

Longitudinal modulus L = 2 "L ..... (6.9)

-~

Shear modulus G = P V s 2 ..... (6.10) Bulk modulus K = L - (4/3) G ..... (6.11)

1-2 (VS/VL) 2 Poisson's ratio 6 = -------------

2 ..... (6.12) 2-2 (VS/VL)

Young's modulus E = (1 +6 ) 2G ..... (6.13)

6.4. Work Undertaken in the Present Study

In the present study two systems of quarternary

glasses CaO-B 0 - A1203-~a 0 and CaO-E 0 -A1 0 -Fe 0 2 3 2 2 3 2 3 2 3

containing different concentrations of Ma20 and Fe203

respectively were prepared. Longitudinal and transverse

ultrasonic velocity in these glasses were determined using

ultrasonic pulse echo overlap technique. The elastic

moduli and Poisson's ratio with concentration of Na20 and

Fe 0 are discussed. 2 3

6.5. Experimental Details

Two systems of ylass samples 10Ca0-(75-x) B 0 -15 2 3

A1 0 -xNa 0, x varying from 15 to 24 mol% and 20 2 3 2

CaO-(70-y) B 0 - 10 A1203 - y Fe203, y varying from 2 to 2 3

8 mol% were prepared as described in Section 3620f

Chapter 3. Glass samples of thickness about 10 mm and

with smooth and parallel end faces were obtained.

Velocity of longitudinal and transverse ultrasonic waves

in the glass samples were determined using Matec 7700

ultrasonic velocity system and using respectively x cut

and y cut quartz transducers each of frequency 3 MHz. The

block diagram of the experimental set up (figure 2 . 5 ) and

the procedure for the measurement of the ultrasonic

velocity are described in detail in Section 2 . 5 of

Chapter 2 . The path length of the ultrasonic waves in the

glass samples were determined by measuring the thickness

of the glass samples using a micrometer. Longitudinal and

transverse ultrasonic velocity in the glass samples

containing different concentrations of Na 0 and Fe203 were 2

determined. The density of the glass samples were

measured making use of Archimede's principle and using

water as the immersion liquid.

6.6. Results and Discussions

Longitudinal ( V L ) and transverse ( V ) velocities of T *

ultrasonic waves of frequency 3 MHz in quarteAnary glass

systems CaO-B 0 -A1203-Ba20 and 2 3 CaO-B 0 -A1 0 -Fe203 2 3 2 3

containing different concentrations of Na20 and Fe203,

respectively, are given in table 6.1. The density of the

glass samples was found to increase with increase in the

concentration of Na 0 and Fe203. 2 It is seen from

figure 6.1 and 6.2 that both VL and VT increase almost

Table 6.1

Variation of ultrasonic velocities, Poisson's ratio and elastic moduli in CaO-B 0 -Al 0 -Na 0 (SS) with varying concentration of Na 0 and in CaO-B 0 -Al 0 -Fe 0 ?F$)

2 3 2 2

with varying concentration of P$ 3 2 3 2 3 2 3

Sample Longitudinal Transverse Dens'ty Poisson's Longitudinal Shear Bulk Young's f Name velocity velocity kg/m ratio modulus modulus modulus modulus

m/sec m/sc K bar K bar K bar K bar

Figure 6.1 Variation of longitudinal and transverse velocities in CaO-B 0 -A1 0 -Na 0 with varying concentrations20? N~;O! 2

Figure 6.2 Variation of longitudinal and transverse velocities in CaO-B 0 -A1 0 -Fe203 with varying concentration$ df ~ 6 ~ d ~ .

regularly with the concentration of Na20 or Fe203. But

the rate of increase of V is greater than that of VT for L

both the glass systems investigated. The values of the

three elastic constants and the ~oisson's ratio evalu ated

usins expressions 6.9 to 6.13 are given in tables 6.1.

It is seen that for both the glass systems the modulii of

elasticity show almost a regular increase over the entire

variation of concentration of Na 0 and Fe 0 [figure 6.3 2 2 3

and 6.4). But the Poisson's ratio exhibit a reverse trend

(figure 6.5 and 6.6).

From X-ray diffraction studies by Biscoe and

Warren[43] had pointed out that as an alkali oxide is

added to B203, the coordination of boron which is 3 in

B203 changes to 4. It is known for some time that the

physical properties of binary borate - glasses display

unusual trends with change in their composition. This

behaviour known as "boron oxide anomaly", has been

investigated by many workers. Internal friction studies

of sodium borate glasses[44,45] showed that this anomaly

occurs at 15 mo18 of alkali oxide, while Abe screening

theoryL461 suggested the saturation of BO to occur at 4

16 mol%. But ultrasonic studies of Gladkov and

Tarasov[47] showed this anomaly to occur at 35 mol% Na20.

Figure 6.3 Variation of elastic constants in CaO-8 0 - iil 2 o 3 -Na20 with varying concentrations2 a t Na20.

Figure 6 . 4 Variation of elastic constants in CaO-B 0 - A1203-Fe203 with varying concentrations2 af Fe 0

2 3'

Figure 6.5 Variation of Poisson's ratio in CaO-B 0 - A 1 2 0 3 -Na20, with varying concentrations2 a f Na203.

Figure 6.6 Variation of Poisson's ratio in CaO-B 0 - A1203-Fe 0 with varying concentrations2 df Fe203. 2 3

Recent ultrasonic studies by Sidkey et a1.1351 on sodium

borate glasses have showed that both longitudinal and

transverse ultrasonic velocity in sodium borate glasses

and the elastic constants increased with concentration of

Na20 upto 27 mol%. The increase in ultrasonic velocity

has been attributed to an increase in packing density due

to the transformation of coordination of boron from 3 to 4

and consequent occupation of the intersticies by the

alkali ions. But once BO groups get saturated, non- 4

bridging oxygens start appearing producing a loose

structure. This phenomenon was not observed by

Sidkey et a1.[35] upto a concentration of 28 mol% of Na20.

In these studies Poisson's ratio was found to increase

with increase in Na 0 concentration. They pointed out 2

that addition of Na 0 changes the coordination of boron 2

from three to four making the glass strong and rendering

maximum rigidity. KodamaI401 have measured the elastic

properties of potassium borate glasses as a function of

concentration of K 0 and analysed the elastic properties 2

in terms of the three structural units represented by Bg3,

+ X+B g26 and K B o4 , where P) represents a bridging

- oxysen and 0 a non-bridging oxygen, on the assumption

that the three structural units have their respective

elastic constants. It was shown numerically that the

structural unit B B 4 increases the rigidity of the glass

+ whereas the unit K ~(3~0- decreases it.

In the present ultrasonic investigations both the

longitudinal and transverse ultrasonic velocities were

found to increase with concentration of Na 0 and Fe203. 2

Also the elastic constants showed almost a regular

increase with concentration of Na20 or Fe203. These

results may be explained by making use of the results of

ultrasonic investigations on binary borate glasses

reported in the literature[35,40] as is done in the case

of laser Raman spectra where results from the Raman

studies of binary glasses are made use of in the

interpretation of spectra of ternary and quarternary

glasses[48,49]. Results of laser Raman studies (Chapter 5

of this thesis) of the ternary glass CaO-B 0 -A1203 showed 2 3

that the structure of the glass consists of mainly boroxol

rings containing only bridging oxygen. When Na20 is added

to this glass system (so that the resultant glass is CaO-

B 0 -A1203- Na20) the structure was found to consist 2 3

mainly of tetraborate groups and at high concentration of

Na 0 pentaborate groups were formed (Chapter 5 of this 2

thesis). A few percentage of diborate-pentaborate and

other groups having bridging oxygens were also detected

in this structure. The main structural units in

quarternary glass CaO-B 0 -A1 0 -Fe203 were found to be 2 3 2 3

boroxol rings for low concentration of Fe 0 where as at 2 3

high concentration boroxol rings transform into other

9roups all having only bridging oxygens (Chapter 5).

In these transformations boron undergo a change from three

coordinated to four coordinate @"and it is reported that

the presence of B a 4 increases the rigidity of the

glass[40]. It has also been reported that in the case of

binary sodium borate glasses as the concentration of Na20

is increased the packing density increased due a

transformation of coordination of boron from 3 to 4 and

consequent occupation of the intensities by the alkali

ions[35]. The increase in ultrasonic velocity and the

elastic moduli in the present study may also be attributed

to the increase in packing density and rigidity of the

c,lass samples as the concentration of Na20 or Fe20j is

increased. The laser Raman spectra indicated the presence

of a few loose diborate and loose B04 groups. Their

concentration should be small since a large concentration

of these groups should Lead to a decrease in the rigidity

of the glass resulting in the decrease of ultrasonic

velocity and the elastic constants, whereas an increase in

these quantities were observed. Poisson's ratio had been

reported to be increasing with alkali oxide concentration

in binary oxide glasses[35], while it had been observed

to decrease upto a certain concentration of ZnO and then

increase in the case of zinc oxide glasses[37]. In the

present study, Poisson's ratio showed a regular decrease

with increase in concentration of both Na 0 and Fe203. 2

The regular variation of ultrasonic vel(-~ities and the

elastic constants of the two systems of quarternary

glasses investigated in the present study show that the

transformation of the structural groups in these glasses

to other groups is systematic and does not cause a

disruption of the structure which is also supported by the

Raman scattering results (Chapter 5 of thls thesis) that

the Ranan peak characteristic of a continuous random

network was prominently present in the spectra of all the

$lass samples investigated. The ultrasonic velocity or

the elastic constants do not show a decreasing trend in

any of the glasses. This may be attributed to the reason

that within the variation in Na 0 and Fe 0 studied, B 0 4 2 2 3

groups do not get saturated and show a trend for the

fornation of nonbridging oxygens leading to a loose

structure.

6.7. Conclusion

Ultrasonic velocity of longitudinal and transverse

waves of frequency 3 ElHz has been determined in two

quarternary glass systems. The elastic constants and

Poisson's ratio have been evaluated. The increase in the

values of ultrasonic velocity and elastic constants has

been attributed to an increase in the packing density and

rigidity of the glass samples as a result of a

transformation of the coordination of boron from 3 to 4

when the concentration of Na 0 and Fe 0 respectively in 2 2 3

the two systems of glasses is increased. It is also

concluded that the transformation of the groups

constituting the structure of the glass into other groups

on increasing the concentration of Na 0 or Fe 0 does not 2 2 3

affect the rigidity of the glass so that the random

continuous network of glass is maintained.

References

1. True11 R., Elbaurin C. and Chick B.B., Ultrasonic Eiethods in Sold State Physics, Academic Press, N.Y. (1965).

~opkins I.L. and Kukijian C.R., in Physical Acoustics, ed., Mason W.P., Vol. 2B, Academic Press, p.91 (1965).

Heydernanna P.L.M., Rev. Sci. Instr., 42, 983 (1971).

Kul'bitskaya I.l.N., Romanov V.P. and Shutilov V.A., Sov. Phys. Acoust., 19, 399 (1974).

Bhatia A.B., Ultrasonic Absorption, Clarendon Press, Oxford (1967).

Muntigton H.B., The Elastic Constants of Crystals, ed., Seitz F. and Turnbul D., "Solid State Physics", Advances in Research and Applications, Vo1.7, p.213, Academic Press, N.Y. (1958).

Nye J.F. "Physical Properties of Crystals", Oxford University Press, N.Y. (1960).

Bhayavantan S., "Crystal Symmetry and Physical Properties", Academic Press, New York (1966).

Mearrnon R.F.S., Advan. Phy., 5, 323 (1956).

10. Hearrnon.R.F.S., "Introduction to Applied Anisotropic Elasticity", Oxford Press (1961).

11. Federov E.S., "Synrnetry of Crystals", Polycrystal Book Service (1971).

12. Kusgrave N.J.P., "Crystal Acoustics", Holden-day, San Francisco (1970).

13. 'lason W.P., "Physical Acoustics and Properties of Solids" Van Nostrand. Reinhold, Princeton, New Jersey (1950).

14. llason W.P., "Piezoelectric Crystals and their Application to Ultrasonics", Van Nostrand-Reinhold, Princeton, New Jersey (1950).

15. Ilason M.P., "Crystal Physics of Interaction Processes", Academic Press, Inc., N.Y. (1966).

16. Anderson P.W., Malperin B.I. and Varma C.M., Phil. Mag., 25, 1 (1972).

17. Phillip W.A., J. Low Temp. Phys., 7, 351 (1972).

Ng. D and Sladek R.J., Phys. Rev., B11, 4017 (1975).

Claytor T.N. and Sladek R.J., Phys. Rev. B18, 10, 5842 (19781,

Kul'bitskaya M.N. and Shytilor V.A., J. Sov. Phys. Acous t . , 451 (1976).

Kodana M., Phys. & Chern. Glasses, 26, 105 (1985).

Higazy A.A. and Bridge B., J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 81 (1985).

Carini G., Cutroni M., Federico M. and Tripodo G., Solid St. Ion., 18 & 19, 415 (1986).

Kazuhira Uasata, Katsurni Ohira, Hisao Yarnada and - Kazuhiro S. Goto, Metall. Trans., 18B, 549 (1987).

Bridge B. and pate1 N.D., J. Mat. Sci., 22, 781 (1987).

Danodaran K.V., Selvaraj V. and Rao K.J., Mater. Res. Bul., 23, 1151 (1988).

Selvaraj V. and Rao K.J., J. Non-Cryst. Solids, (1988).

Bhatti S.S. and Santokh Singh, Acustica, 65, 2 6 1 (1988).

Makishima A. and Mackenzie J.D., J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 12, 35 (1975).

i.lakishima A. and Mackenzie J.D., J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 17, 147 (1975).

Bhatti S.S. and Anand Pal Singh, Acustica, 68, 181 (1989).

Bhatti S.S. Santokh Singh, J. Pure and Appl. Ultrason, 8, 101 (1986).

Anand Pal Singh, Gurjit and Bhatti S.S., 11, 49 (1989).

Anand P a l S i n g h , Kanwar J i t S i n g h a n d B h a t t i S.S., J. P u r e and Appl . U l t r a s o n . , 1 2 , 70 ( 1 9 9 0 ) .

S i d k e y M . A . , Abd-Ei F a t t a h , Abd-Ei L a t i f a n d N a k h l a R . I . , J . P u r e a n d A p p l . U l t r a s o n , 1 2 , 9 3 ( 1 9 9 0 ) .

P a d a k e S.V., Yawale S .P . a n d Adgaokar C.S. , P r o c . I n t . Cong. U l t r a s o n . , C - 1 ( 1 9 9 0 ) .

Kanbrar J i t S i n g h , S i n g h D.P. a n d B h a t t i S .S . , J . P u r e a n d Appl . U l t r a s o n . , 1 4 ( 1 9 9 2 ) .

M u k h e r j e e S . , Basu C. a n d Ghosh U.S., J . A c o u s t . S o c . I n d . , 3 & 4 , 57 ( 1 9 9 0 ) .

J a n a k i r a m a Rao BH. V . , J. Am. Ceram. Soc . , 1 8 , 311 ( 1 9 6 5 ) .

Kodama M . , J . Non-Crys t . S o l i d s , 1 2 7 , 6 5 ( 1 9 9 1 ) .

Anand P a l S i n g h a n d B h a t t i S . S . , J . P u r e a n d A p p l . U l t r a s o n . , 1 4 , 3 6 ( 1 9 9 2 ) .

B o r j e s s o n L. a n d T o r e l l L .M. , P h y s . L e t t . , 1 0 7 A , 1 9 0 ( 1 9 8 5 ) .

B i s c o e J. a n d W a r r e n B.E., J . Am. Ceram. S o c . , 2 1 , 287 ( 1 9 3 8 ) .

K a r s c h K.M. a n d J e n c k e l E . , G l a s t e c h B e r . , 3 4 , 397 ( 1 9 6 1 ) .

Coenen PI. ,, 2 . E l e k r o c h e n . , 6 5 , 903 ( 1 9 6 1 ) .

Abe, J . Am. Ceram. S o c . , 3 5 , 284 ( 1 9 5 2 ) .

G l a d k o v A.V. a n d T a r a s o v V . V . , . T h e S t r u c t u r e o f Glass , V o l . 1 1 , C o n s u l t a n t s B u r e a u , N . Y . ( 1 9 6 0 ) .

K o n i j n e n d i j k W.L. a n d S t e v e l s J . M . , J . Non-Crys t . S o l i d s , 1 8 , 307 ( 1 9 7 5 ) .

Pieera B.N. a n d R a r n a k r i s h n a J . , J. Non-Crys t . S o l i d s . 1 5 9 , 1 ( 1 9 9 3 ) .