53
Industrial Advisory Board Fall 2013

Industrial Advisory Board...engineering problems. 3.0 3.4 Outcome (f): Understanding of professional and ethical responsibility. 3.0 3.1 Outcome (g): Ability to communicate effectively

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Industrial Advisory Board Fall 2013

  • Welcome New member:

    • Jim Cale, National Renewable Energy Laboratory

    http://www.broadcom.com/http://www.woodward.com/

  • Agenda • Department Update • Industry Spotlight: Covidien • Overview of School of Biomedical Engineering • Break • Breakout Session: Growing ECE’s Biomedical

    Program • Discuss Results of Breakout Session • Break • Expanding the IAB • Research Spotlight • Lunch & Senior Design Presentations

  • Department Update Tony Maciejewski, ECE Department Head

  • College Update • New hires:

    – Dean McLean started July 1 – Matt Carlyon named COE

    development director – Search underway for

    assistant development director

    • Scott Bioengineering Building now open

  • New Faces in ECE

    • Sourajeet Roy, new faculty

    • Kate Douglass, academic advisor

  • Faculty News

    • ECE professors receive NSF award to design green computers

    • EUV ERC named new Research Experience for Teachers (RET) site by the NSF

  • • Rocca featured in Nature

    Photonics • Professor Bringi tribute held

    at AMS Annual Conference on Radar Meteorology

    • Menoni secures grant with DOD Office of the Secretary of Defense’s High-Energy Laser Technology Office

  • Student News • “Backpackable Underwater Remote Operated

    Vehicle” wins Best Paper Contest – Rachel Dondero (EE), Sarah Romer (EE), Justin

    Kopacz (EE), Luke Stahler (Mech), and Michael Hake (Mech)

  • • Schiltz receives highly prestigious NSF Fellowship (advised by Menoni)

    • Xiang and Rajkrishna named Young Student Fellows at IEEE/ACM Design Automation Conference (advised by Pasricha)

    • Tarplee and Friese win Best Paper at international conference (advised by Maciejewski & Siegel)

  • Recent K-12 Outreach • EUV ERC outreach to Girl Scouts

    • ECE student led first STEM/Cyber Summer Camp with Northrop Grumman

  • • Nice turnout for annual Design Your Future Day last week (idea spawned at IAB meeting) – 32 engineers from 19 companies – THANK YOU!

  • ABET Update

    • Site visit scheduled for early November • Evaluators may call on IAB members for

    participation and input • Thank you for your participation – your feedback

    is invaluable

  • SP06 SP13 Outcome (a): Ability to apply knowledge of math, engineering, and science.

    3.3 3.6

    Outcome (b): Ability to design and conduct experiments, an analyze and interpret data

    2.7 3.2

    Outcome (c): Ability to design a system, component, or process to meet needs.

    2.6 3.2

    Outcome (d): Ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams. 3.6 3.3 Outcome (e): Ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems.

    3.0 3.4

    Outcome (f): Understanding of professional and ethical responsibility.

    3.0 3.1

    Outcome (g): Ability to communicate effectively. 2.9 2.7 Outcome (h): Broad education for understanding engineering in societal context.

    2.8 2.9

    Outcome (i): Recognition of need to engage in life-long learning.

    2.9 2.8

    Outcome (j): Knowledge of contemporary issues. 2.5 2.9 Outcome (k): Ability to use techniques, skills, and tools in engineering practice.

    3.3 3.3

    Industrial Advisory Board Survey Results (on scale of 1-4)

    IAB Survey Results for ABET

  • COE Research Expenditures

    0

    2,000,000

    4,000,000

    6,000,000

    8,000,000

    10,000,000

    12,000,000

    14,000,000

    2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013

    CBE

    ME

    CEE

    ECE

  • COE Research Expenditures

    ATS 23%

    CIRA 27%

    ECE 20%

    CEE 16%

    ME 10%

    CBE 4%

    College of Engineering 46%

    2012-2013

    ATS CIRA ECE CEE ME CBE

  • ECE Research Expenditures

    2,636,379

    12,863,408

    $0

    $2,000,000

    $4,000,000

    $6,000,000

    $8,000,000

    $10,000,000

    $12,000,000

    $14,000,000

    2002-2003 2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013

  • ECE ranks high in research • ECE faculty rank 28th (out of 370 programs) in the country for

    research expenditures per faculty member – ECE is 36th overall for total research funding

    • ECE outranks:

    – Purdue – Princeton – U. CA, Davis – Texas A&M – CU

    *NSF data (2009)

  • US News & World Report Top Institutions • Berkeley • California Institute of Technology • Carnegie Mellon • Cornell University • Georgia Institute of Technology • MIT • Princeton • Purdue • Stanford • University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign • University of Michigan • University of Texas, Austin

    CSU Peer Institutions (as ID’d by CSU BOG) • Iowa State University • Kansas State University • Michigan State University • North Carolina State University • Oklahoma State University • Oregon State University • Purdue University • Texas A & M University • University of California, Davis • University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign • University of Tennessee • Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State

    University • Washington State University

    Top ECE institutions & peers

  • $4.1

    $2.4

    $5.5

    $3.9

    $-

    $1.0

    $2.0

    $3.0

    $4.0

    $5.0

    $6.0

    Colorado State University ↑35% Peer Institutions (Avg) ↑59%

    x100

    000

    ECE Research Expenditures per Tenured Faculty Member: CSU & Peer Institutions

    (2007 vs 2012)

    2007

    2012

  • National Enrollment Trends

    0

    50,000

    100,000

    150,000

    200,000

    250,000

    300,000

    350,000

    0

    20,000

    40,000

    60,000

    80,000

    100,000

    120,000

    2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

    Biomedical Engineering

    Electrical & Computer Engineering

    Mechanical Engineering

    Chemical Engineering

    Engineering Science

    Civil Engineering

    Environmental Engineering

    Total Engineering

  • ECE Fall Enrollment

    399 380

    360 345 350

    391

    443

    480

    565

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    FA05 FA06 FA07 FA08 FA09 FA10 FA11 FA12 FA13

    PhD-Systems (on-campus)

    MS-Systems (on-campus)

    ME-Systems (on-campus)

    PhD

    Masters

    Undergraduate (incl BME)

  • Undergraduate Degrees Awarded

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13

    Num

    ber BSCpE

    BSEE

  • Freshmen Enrollment

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    FA08 FA09 FA10 FA11 FA12 FA13

    Freshmen Biom/EE

    Freshmen Biom/EELO

    Freshmen CpE

    Freshmen EE

  • Enrollment Trends by Class

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    FA08 FA09 FA10 FA11 FA12 FA13

    Freshmen Total

    Sophomore Total

    Junior Total

    Senior Total

  • 70

    8

    70

    27

    4

    59

    10

    46

    37

    8

    44

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    Colorado State University ↓16%

    University of Colorado at Denver ↑25%

    University of Colorado at Boulder ↓34%

    University of Colorado at Colorado Springs

    ↑37%

    University of Denver ↑100%

    Colorado School ofMines (2007 Data

    Not Available)

    Enro

    llmen

    t Num

    bers

    ECE Freshmen Enrollment: Colorado Institutions (2007 vs 2012)

    2007

    2012

  • 257

    131

    327

    142

    18

    291

    167

    328

    130

    45

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    350

    Colorado State University ↑13%

    University of Colorado at Denver ↑27%

    University of Colorado at Boulder ↑0.3%

    University of Colorado at Colorado Springs ↓8%

    University of Denver ↑150%

    Enro

    llmen

    t Num

    bers

    Total ECE Undergraduate Enrollment: Colorado Institutions (2007 vs 2012)

    2007

    2012

  • ECE Freshmen Retention Rates

    Persistence Rates Within Department by Cohort Department and Cohort Term

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    FA90

    FA92

    FA94

    FA96

    FA98

    FA00

    FA02

    FA04

    FA06

    FA08

    FA10

    FA12

    Cohort Size

    Cohort Size

    0102030405060708090

    FA90

    FA92

    FA94

    FA96

    FA98

    FA00

    FA02

    FA04

    FA06

    FA08

    FA10

    FA12

    Persistence Rate

    Persistence Rate

  • Persistence Rates within ECE Cohort Size by Term 5th Fall Persistence Rates

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    FA02

    FA03

    FA04

    FA05

    FA06

    FA07

    FA08

    FA09

    FA10

    FA11

    FA12

    Cohort Size

    Cohort Size

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    FA02 FA03 FA04 FA05 FA06 FA07 FA08 FA09

    Persistence Rate

    Persistence Rate

  • Women in Engineering (FA13)

    CBE 16%

    CEE 31%

    ECE 6%

    ME 20%

    Intra-College 27%

    CBE 4%

    AS 19%

    CEE 43%

    ECE 23%

    ME 8%

    Intra-College 3%

    Undergraduate Graduate

  • Women in ECE

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    45

    FA08 FA09 FA10 FA11 FA12 FA13

    Number UG WomenPercent UG WomenNumber GR WomenPercent GR Women

  • Graduate Degrees Awarded

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    45

    50

    2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13

    Num

    ber

    Full Year

    MS-Systems (on-campus)

    ME-Systems (distance)

    ME-Systems (on-campus)

    MS

    Ph.D.

  • % of International Degrees Awarded

    0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    0.9

    2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13

    Full Year

    ME-Systems(on-campus)

    MS

    Ph.D.

    Total

  • Update on Spring Action Items • Action item: Visit new Advanced Beam Lab as part of a future

    IAB meeting. – Status: Added to the IAB agenda

    for SP14.

    • Action item: Determine ECE’s role in the world of MOOCs. Use the opportunity as a marketing/recruitment tool. – Status: ECE faculty will discuss this topic at fall retreat

    tomorrow; we will report back at the spring IAB meeting.

  • • Action item: Help the public understand the importance of an engineering degree by publicizing salary benefits and job opportunities. – Status: Info included in recruitment presentations and will be

    prominently featured on new ECE web site.

    • Action item: Create YouTube channel for ECE. – Status: Already exists, but new videos are

    being developed to highlight on the channel.

    • Action item: Require senior design students to create project videos that could be used to promote the department. – Status: Experimenting with the idea this semester; we will

    report back in the spring.

  • • Action item: Show gender demographics as part of future

    department updates. – Status: Stats will be included in department update each fall.

    • Action item: Maintain department Facebook page for marketing purposes; social media should be led by students. – Status: ECE student ambassador hired to manage Facebook.

    http://www.linkedin.com/groups?home=&gid=36343&trk=anet_ug_hmhttp://www.linkedin.com/groups?home=&gid=36343&trk=anet_ug_hm

  • Industry Spotlight: Covidien Todd Hansell, Director, Design Quality

    Engineering

  • Overview of CSU School of Biomedical Engineering

    Dr. Stuart Tobet, Director, School of Biomedical Engineering

  • Break

  • Breakout Session Growing ECE’s Biomedical Program

  • Considerations: • Is the low number of EE’s doing biomed a problem? If

    so, how do we address this? – Why do you believe more students are interested in

    mechanical/biomedical engineering?

    • Does your company play a role in the biomedical space? If so, in what capacity?

    • As an employer, would you find attractive a student with a biomedical engineering and ECE background, even if you don’t interact in the biomedical field?

  • Discuss Results of Breakout Session

    Facilitators: Jason Gentry and Scott Evans

  • Break

  • Expanding the IAB Andrea Leland

  • Goals for the board • Expand the IAB to include more active,

    connected professionals like yourselves

    • Structure should reflect the department as well as the local and national industry

    • Include big and small companies that hire ECE

    alumni (not limited to Colorado)

  • Current companies

    http://www.broadcom.com/http://www.woodward.com/http://www.pepsi.com/

  • Wish list (initial draft)

    • Lockheed Martin • AMD • Seagate • City of Fort Collins • Kodak • Ball Corp • Micron

    • Google • Xcel Energy • Oracle • CenturyLink • Cummins Corporation • Qualcomm

  • Key responsibilities of IAB members • Assist with ECE strategic plan • Foster mutually beneficial relationships between

    department and industry (e.g., research collaborations)

    • Provide input regarding curriculum plans • Act as advocate for the ECE department • Assist with fundraising priorities, donor identification,

    and cultivation • Participate in events and activities to benefit the

    department

  • It’s all about the people Desired qualifications: • Manager level or above • Someone with an interest

    in working with CSU • Energetic and enthusiastic

    about education and the discipline

    • Highly connected and knowledgeable

  • Homework • Send me contact information for at least

    one potential board member: [email protected]

    • Feel free to chat with me after the meeting about your ideas for members

    • We will discuss your suggestions at our spring meeting

  • Research Spotlight ECE Professor Randy Bartels

  • Lunch & Senior Design Presentation

  • Closing Remarks, Tour of Bioengineering Lab

    Tony Maciejewski

    Slide Number 1Welcome�AgendaSlide Number 4College Update New Faces in ECEFaculty NewsSlide Number 8Student NewsSlide Number 10Recent K-12 OutreachSlide Number 12ABET UpdateIAB Survey Results for ABETCOE Research ExpendituresCOE Research ExpendituresECE Research ExpendituresECE ranks high in researchTop ECE institutions & peersSlide Number 20National Enrollment TrendsECE Fall EnrollmentUndergraduate Degrees AwardedFreshmen EnrollmentEnrollment Trends by ClassSlide Number 26Slide Number 27ECE Freshmen Retention Rates�Persistence Rates within ECEWomen in Engineering (FA13)Women in ECEGraduate Degrees Awarded% of International Degrees AwardedUpdate on Spring Action Items ���Slide Number 37Slide Number 38Slide Number 39Slide Number 40Considerations:Slide Number 42Slide Number 43Slide Number 44Goals for the boardCurrent companiesWish list (initial draft)Key responsibilities of IAB membersIt’s all about the peopleHomeworkSlide Number 51Slide Number 52Slide Number 53Slide Number 54