1
INDUCED PRISMATIC EFFECTS DUE TO POORLY FITTED SPECTACLE Optom. ANJALI AHUJA¹, Optom. USMAN MEMON² NAGAR SCHOOL OF OPTOMETRY¹² 01 INTRODUCTION Looking at the current scenario of market the norms for minimum standards for optical dispensing prac- tice are not being followed, therefore current study was undertaken, to understand the importance of fitting aspects of spectacles with respect to the in- ter pupillary distance, in spectacle wearers with no complaints. 02 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES To study the prevalence and understand the associated prismatic effects of poorly fitted spectacle in asymptomatic wearers. To determine the percentage of induced horizontal and vertical prismatic effects according to ANSI tolerance Z80.1-2010 in single vision spectacle wearers, who were using decentered lenses. 03 METHODOLOGY Following stepwise procedure was followed for each and every individual :- The Inter pupillary distance was measured with the help of Pupillometer Optical centers were marked with black marker and power was measured using Lensometer The co-relation between frame centration with respect to PD was taken into consideration The distance between frame markings were measured to determine the centration distance & were compared to distance PD Oblique cylinders were resolved into horizontal and vertical components Any prismatic effect present were thereafter calculated using Prentice s rule & recorded 1. A textbook of Optics S. CHAND, N. SUBRAMANYAM BRIJLAL, M. N. AVABHANULU. Chapter 4 (Page No. 72). www.prenticeimage.com 2. Clinical Optics, Second Edition, Troy E Fennin, O. D. Theodore Grosvenor, O. D. Chapter 4 (Page No. 85, 86, 95, 96, 97, 98). 3. System for Ophthalmic dispensing, Second Edition, Clifford W. Brook, O. D. Irvin M. Borish, Chapter 3, 5, 15, 16, 18 (Page No 26, 27, 425, 427, 434). 4. Teachers Eye Care. Proper Care of Your Spectacles. 5. Available from: https://www.teacherseyecare.com.au/nbspnbspproduct/ProperCareofyourspectacle/tabid/62/Default.aspx (Accessed on the 02/09/2010). 6. Brooks CW, Borish IM. System for Ophthalmic dispensing. New York: Professional Press, 1979 pp 27-65. 7. VR Moodley, F Kadwa, B Nxumalo, S Penceliah, B Ramkalam, A Zama. Induced prismatic effect due to poorly fitting spectacle frames. 8. S Air Optom 2011 70 (4) 168-174. ISSN 0378-9411. 9. Fowler C, Latham Petre K. Spectacle lenses: Theory and practice. Butterworth-Heinemann Oxford 2001 pp37-51. 10. Osuobeni EP, Al-Fahdi M. Differences between anatomical and physiological interpupillary distance. J Am Optom As-soc 1994 65 265-71. 11. Griffin JR, Grisham JD, Binocular anomalies diagnosis and vision therapy, 4th ed. Butterworth Heinemann 2002 (Page no 92.). 12. Fernandez-Ruiz J., Diaz R. Prism adaptation and aftereffect: specifying the properties of a procedural memory system. Learn Mem 1999 6(1) (pgs. 47-53). 13. Henson DB, North R. Adaptation to prism induced heterophoria. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1980 57 127-137. 14. Du Toit R, Ramke J, Brian G. Tolerance to prism induced by readymade spectacles: setting and using standard. Am J Optom 2007 84 (11) 1053-9. 15. Topliss WS. Optical dispensing and workshop practice. Butterworth London, 1975 pp 42-59. 16. Jalie M. The principles of ophthalmic lenses. 4th ed. The Association of British Dispensing Opticians London 1992. Though all the asymptomatic subjects were not looking through the optical center of their spectacles are benefitted due to probable prism adaptation in lower prescriptions. As current scenario demands more of near and intermediate work profile for longer duration, it is of ut- most importance that pupillary distance should coincide with optical centers of the spectacle in case of every individuals for zero or least prismatic effect. But if some prismatic effect still persist, it can be adapted. INCLUSION CRITERIA EXCLUSION CRITERIA Asymptomatic single vision spectacle wearers Bifocal wearers Multifocal wearers Strabismic Individuals As per ANSI tolerance, study subjects were divided in 2 groups :- For power ±2.75D in horizontal meridian For power ±2.75 D In horizontal meridian Unwanted horizontal prism for both eyes combined shall not be greater than 0.67 ∆. Horizontal difference from ordered PD and Actual PD measured, dis- tance between the PRP shall not be greater than 2.5mm. For power ±3.375D in vertical meridian For power ±3.375 D in vertical meridian Unwanted vertical imbalance shall not exceed 0.33 ∆. Vertical difference between the PRP shall not be greater than 1mm . STUDY FINDINGS:- Out of 100 , there were 58 female subjects. Horizontal Prismatic effect for lenses of power ±2.75D was effec- tive in right eye of 47% subjects with effect of 1.31 ±0.91 D left eye of 43% subjects were with effect of 1.27 ±0.90 D . Horizontal Prismatic effect for lenses of power ±2.75D was effec- tive in 17% with effect of 3.28 ±1.78 D in right eye and 25% with effect of 3.52 ±1.44 D in left eye in the horizontal meridian . Vertical Prismatic effect was effective in right eye of 30% subjects with effect of 0.20 ±0.47 D and in left eye of 34% subjects noticed the prismatic effect of 0.24 ±0.51 D for lenses of power ±3.375 D. And for lenses of power ±3.375 D , in right eye 13% noticed vertical differences between PRP was greater than 1 mm with 1.72 ±1.47 D in vertical meridian and in left eye, 14% subjects noticed vertical differences between PRP was greater than 1 mm with 1.85 ±1.69 D in vertical meridian . 06 REFERENCES 04 RESULTS 05 DISCUSSION

INDU ED PRISMATI EFFE TS DUE TO POORLY FITTED SPE TA LE · 2020. 9. 24. · INDU ED PRISMATI EFFE TS DUE TO POORLY FITTED SPE TA LE Optom. ANJALI AHUJA¹, Optom. USMAN MEMON² NAGAR

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • I N D U C E D P R I S M AT I C E F F E C T S D U E TO P O O R LY F I T T E D S P E C TA C L E Optom. ANJALI AHUJA¹, Optom. USMAN MEMON²

    NAGAR SCHOOL OF OPTOMETRY¹²

    0 1 I N T R O D U C T I O N

    L o o k i n g a t t h e c u r r e n t s c e n a r i o o f m a r ke t t h e n o r m s

    f o r m i n i m u m s t a n d a r d s f o r o p t i c a l d i s p e n s i n g p ra c -

    t i c e a r e n o t b e i n g f o l l o w e d , t h e r e f o r e c u r r e n t s t u d y

    w a s u n d e r t a ke n , t o u n d e r s t a n d t h e i m p o r t a n c e o f

    f i t t i n g a s p e c t s o f s p e c t a c l e s w i t h r e s p e c t t o t h e i n -

    t e r p u p i l l a r y d i s t a n c e , i n s p e c t a c l e w e a r e r s w i t h n o

    c o m p l a i n t s .

    0 2 A I M S A N D O B J E C T I V E S

    To s t u d y t h e p r e v a l e n c e a n d u n d e r s t a n d t h e a s s o c i a t e d p r i s m a t i c e f f e c t s o f

    p o o r l y f i t t e d s p e c t a c l e i n a s y m p t o m a t i c w e a r e r s .

    To d e t e r m i n e t h e p e r c e n t a g e o f i n d u c e d h o r i z o n t a l a n d v e r t i c a l p r i s m a t i c e f f e c t s

    a c c o r d i n g t o A N S I t o l e ra n c e Z 8 0 . 1 - 2 0 1 0 i n s i n g l e v i s i o n s p e c t a c l e w e a r e r s , w h o

    w e r e u s i n g d e c e n t e r e d l e n s e s .

    0 3 M E T H O D O LO G Y

    Fo l l o w i n g s t e p w i s e p r o c e d u r e wa s f o l l o w e d f o r e a c h a n d e v e r y i n d i v i d ua l : - T h e I n t e r p u p i l l a r y d i s t a n c e w a s m e a s u r e d w i t h t h e h e l p o f P u p i l l o m e t e r

    O p t i c a l c e n t e r s w e r e m a r k e d w i t h b l a c k m a r k e r a n d p o w e r w a s m e a s u r e d u s i n g L e n s o m e t e r

    T h e c o - r e l a t i o n b e t w e e n f r a m e c e n t r a t i o n w i t h r e s p e c t t o P D w a s t a k e n i n t o c o n s i d e r a t i o n

    T h e d i s t a n c e b e t w e e n f r a m e m a r k i n g s w e r e m e a s u r e d t o d e t e r m i n e t h e c e n t r a t i o n d i s t a n c e & w e r e

    c o m p a r e d t o d i s t a n c e P D

    O b l i q u e c y l i n d e r s w e r e r e s o l v e d i n t o h o r i z o n t a l a n d v e r t i c a l c o m p o n e n t s

    A n y p r i s m a t i c e f f e c t p r e s e n t w e r e t h e r e a f t e r c a l c u l a t e d u s i n g P r e n t i c e ’ s r u l e & r e c o r d e d

    1 . A t e x t b o o k o f O p t i c s S . C H A N D , N . S U B R A M A N Y A M B R I J L A L , M . N . A V A B H A N U L U . C h a p t e r 4 ( P a g e N o . 7 2 ) . w w w . p r e n t i c e i m a g e . c o m

    2 . C l i n i c a l O p t i c s , S e c o n d E d i t i o n , T r o y E F e n n i n , O . D . T h e o d o r e G r o s v e n o r , O . D . C h a p t e r 4 ( P a g e N o . 8 5 , 8 6 , 9 5 , 9 6 , 9 7 , 9 8 ) .

    3 . S y s t e m f o r O p h t h a l m i c d i s p e n s i n g , S e c o n d E d i t i o n , C l i f f o r d W . B r o o k , O . D . I r v i n M . B o r i s h , C h a p t e r 3 , 5 , 1 5 , 1 6 , 1 8 ( P a g e N o 2 6 , 2 7 , 4 2 5 , 4 2 7 , 4 3 4 ) .

    4 . T e a c h e r s E y e C a r e . P r o p e r C a r e o f Y o u r S p e c t a c l e s .

    5 . A v a i l a b l e f r o m : h t t p s : / / w w w . t e a c h e r s e y e c a r e . c o m . a u / n b s p n b s p p r o d u c t / P r o p e r C a r e o f y o u r s p e c t a c l e / t a b i d / 6 2 / D e f a u l t . a s p x ( A c c e s s e d o n t h e 0 2 / 0 9 / 2 0 1 0 ) .

    6 . B r o o k s C W , B o r i s h I M . S y s t e m f o r O p h t h a l m i c d i s p e n s i n g . N e w Y o r k : P r o f e s s i o n a l P r e s s , 1 9 7 9 p p 2 7 - 6 5 .

    7 . V R M o o d l e y , F K a d w a , B N x u m a l o , S P e n c e l i a h , B R a m k a l a m , A Z a m a . I n d u c e d p r i s m a t i c e f f e c t d u e t o p o o r l y f i t t i n g s p e c t a c l e f r a m e s .

    8 . S A i r O p t o m 2 0 1 1 7 0 ( 4 ) 1 6 8 - 1 7 4 . I S S N 0 3 7 8 - 9 4 1 1 .

    9 . F o w l e r C , L a t h a m P e t r e K . S p e c t a c l e l e n s e s : T h e o r y a n d p r a c t i c e . B u t t e r w o r t h - H e i n e m a n n O x f o r d 2 0 0 1 p p 3 7 - 5 1 .

    1 0 . O s u o b e n i E P , A l - F a h d i M . D i f f e r e n c e s b e t w e e n a n a t o m i c a l a n d p h y s i o l o g i c a l i n t e r p u p i l l a r y d i s t a n c e . J A m O p t o m A s - s o c 1 9 9 4 6 5 2 6 5 - 7 1 .

    1 1 . G r i f f i n J R , G r i s h a m J D , B i n o c u l a r a n o m a l i e s d i a g n o s i s a n d v i s i o n t h e r a p y , 4 t h e d . B u t t e r w o r t h H e i n e m a n n 2 0 0 2 ( P a g e n o 9 2 . ) .

    1 2 . F e r n a n d e z - R u i z J . , D i a z R . P r i s m a d a p t a t i o n a n d a f t e r e f f e c t : s p e c i f y i n g t h e p r o p e r t i e s o f a p r o c e d u r a l m e m o r y s y s t e m . L e a r n M e m 1 9 9 9 6 ( 1 ) ( p g s . 4 7 - 5 3 ) .

    1 3 . H e n s o n D B , N o r t h R . A d a p t a t i o n t o p r i s m i n d u c e d h e t e r o p h o r i a . A m J O p t o m P h y s i o l O p t 1 9 8 0 5 7 1 2 7 - 1 3 7 .

    1 4 . D u T o i t R , R a m k e J , B r i a n G . T o l e r a n c e t o p r i s m i n d u c e d b y r e a d y m a d e s p e c t a c l e s : s e t t i n g a n d u s i n g s t a n d a r d . A m J O p t o m 2 0 0 7 8 4 ( 1 1 ) 1 0 5 3 - 9 .

    1 5 . T o p l i s s W S . O p t i c a l d i s p e n s i n g a n d w o r k s h o p p r a c t i c e . B u t t e r w o r t h L o n d o n , 1 9 7 5 p p 4 2 - 5 9 . 1 6 . J a l i e M . T h e p r i n c i p l e s o f o p h t h a l m i c l e n s e s . 4 t h e d . T h e A s s o c i a t i o n o f B r i t i s h D i s p e n s i n g O p t i c i a n s L o n d o n 1 9 9 2 .

    T h o u g h a l l t h e a s y m p t o m a t i c s u b j e c t s w e r e n o t l o o k i n g t h r o u g h t h e o p t i c a l c e n t e r o f t h e i r s p e c t a c l e s a r e

    b e n e f i t t e d d u e t o p r o b a b l e p r i s m a d a p t a t i o n i n l o w e r p r e s c r i p t i o n s .

    A s c u r r e n t s c e n a r i o d e m a n d s m o r e o f n e a r a n d i n t e r m e d i a t e w o r k p r o f i l e f o r l o n g e r d u ra t i o n , i t i s o f u t -

    m o s t i m p o r t a n c e t h a t p u p i l l a r y d i s t a n c e s h o u l d c o i n c i d e w i t h o p t i c a l c e n t e r s o f t h e s p e c t a c l e i n c a s e o f

    e v e r y i n d i v i d u a l s f o r z e r o o r l e a s t p r i s m a t i c e f f e c t . But if some prismatic effect still persist, it can be adapted.

    INCLUSION CRITERIA

    EXCLUSION CRITERIA

    Asymptomatic single vision spectacle wearers

    Bifocal wearers

    Multifocal wearers

    Strabismic Individuals

    •As per ANSI tolerance, study subjects were divided in 2 groups :-

    For power ≤ ±2.75D in

    horizontal meridian

    For power ≥ ±2.75 D In

    horizontal meridian

    Unwanted horizontal prism for both

    eyes combined shall not be greater

    than 0.67 ∆.

    Horizontal difference from ordered

    PD and Actual PD measured, dis-

    tance between the PRP shall not be

    greater than 2.5mm.

    For power ≤±3.375D in

    vertical meridian

    For power ≥ ±3.375 D in

    vertical meridian

    Unwanted vertical imbalance shall not exceed 0.33 ∆.

    Vertical difference between the PRP shall not be greater than 1mm.

    S T U DY F I N D I N G S : -

    Out of 100, there were 58 female subjects.

    Horizontal Prismatic effect for lenses of power ≤ ±2.75D was effec-

    tive in right eye of 47% subjects with effect of 1.31 ±0.91∆D left

    eye of 43% subjects were with effect of 1.27 ±0.90∆D.

    Horizontal Prismatic effect for lenses of power ≥ ±2.75D was effec-

    tive in 17% with effect of 3.28 ±1.78∆D in right eye and 25% with

    effect of 3.52 ±1.44∆D in left eye in the horizontal meridian .

    Vertical Prismatic effect was effective in right eye of 30% subjects

    with effect of 0.20 ±0.47∆D and in left eye of 34% subjects noticed

    the prismatic effect of 0.24 ±0.51∆D for lenses of power ≤ ±3.375∆D.

    And for lenses of power ≥ ±3.375∆D, in right eye 13% noticed

    vertical differences between PRP was greater than 1 mm with

    1.72 ±1.47∆D in vertical meridian and in left eye, 14% subjects

    noticed vertical differences between PRP was greater than 1 mm

    with 1.85 ±1.69∆D in vertical meridian.

    0 6 R E F E R E N C E S

    0 4 R E S U LT S

    0 5 D I S C U S S I O N

    http://www.prenticeimage.com/