Individual Growth and Development Indicators for Infants and Toddlers Using Progress Monitoring to Support RTI Services for Infants and

Individual Growth and Development Indicators for Infants and Toddlers

www.igdi.ku.edu

Using Progress Monitoring to Support RTI Services for Infants and

Toddlers

DECOctober, 2008


www.igdi.ku.edu

Presenters• Charles Greenwood , Jay Buzhardt, & Dale

Walker– Juniper Gardens Children’s Project, University of

Kansas

• Jerry Gruba, & Sheri Haupert– Heartland Area Education Association, Johnston,

Iowa


www.igdi.ku.edu

Objective• To examine the role of progress monitoring

and decision making regarding children’s response to intervention (RtI) in tiered models of early intervention.

• To illustrate an RTI approach using Individual Growth and Development Indicators (IGDIs) home visiting by providing multiple levels of support for children learning early communication skills.


www.igdi.ku.edu

Presentation Topics• Introduction to Progress Monitoring– Charles

Greenwood• Data-based decision making – Jay Buzhardt• Evidence-based language intervention practices –

Dale Walker• Discussants

– Jerry Gruba– Sheri Haupert

• Q & A


www.igdi.ku.edu

Defining Progress Monitoring• A scientifically based practice that is used to assess

children’s short-term progress toward outcomes and evaluate the effectiveness of instruction.

• Designed to “help caregivers implement and modify curriculum and teaching practices to ensure that all children, including children with disabilities, are progressing toward identified goals” (DEC Promoting Positive Outcomes.., pg 14)

• Brief, repeatable formative assessment sensitive to short-term child learning

• Benchmarks help decide when a child is or is not progressing– Individual Growth and Development Indicators (IGDIs)

www.igdi.ku.edu


www.igdi.ku.edu Features of Progress Monitoring Measures

• Reflect progress toward a socially valid general outcome

• Strategic (a leading indicator) not comprehensive measurement

• Chart an individual’s progress• Brief and quick to administer• Repeatable (rate of growth, slope)• Trend line compares expected vs. actual rates of

learning


www.igdi.ku.edu

The most well known IGDIs are Pediatric Growth Charts

Widely used by pediatricians and parents


www.igdi.ku.edu

Monitoring a Child’s Progress Acquiring Expressive Communication Proficiency

36 Mos ExpectationChild’s

Observed Trajectory

Normative Trajectory


www.igdi.ku.edu

ECI Constructs and Key Skills


www.igdi.ku.edu

Administration• Administration Procedures

– Toy-play setting with familiar adult as play partner

– 6-minute testing sessions– Play partner’s role is to facilitate play

and follow child’s lead– Set-up/clean-up/put away

• Alternate Toy Forms• Observational Recording

Procedures

Toy Form A: House

Toy Form B: Barn


www.igdi.ku.edu


www.igdi.ku.edu

Progress Monitoring

ExploringSolutions

Data-based Decision Making Framework

Monitor

Identify/Validate Need

For InterventionGenerate

Intervention Strategies

ImplementIntervention

EvaluateIntervention

Effectiveness

Monitor

©2003 Juniper Gardens Children’s Project


www.igdi.ku.edu

Family Involvement• Each family plays a role in the decision making

process with respect to review of child progress data and decisions about need for intervention

• Caregivers are involved in the home-based assessment process and as implementers of intervention strategies


www.igdi.ku.edu

Diversity• Individual differences

• RTI and IGDIs reflect the fact that children with and without disabilities develop and respond to early intervention differently

• Children require different intervention intensities to learn.

• Children vary in their rate of progress over time• IGDIs are sensitive to this diversity

• Language differences• IGDIs may be administered by assessors skilled in the

native language of the family and child as well as in English.


www.igdi.ku.edu

Key RtI Principles• A child’s RtI is a critical determinant of

appropriate intervention services• Measures to make this determination must be

sensitive to short-term progress and monitor progress over time (IGDIs)

• Evidence-based practices are provided for children who are not responsive to Tier 1 intervention (Language Intervention Strategies)


www.igdi.ku.edu Conceptualizing RTI in an EHS/Part C Home Visiting Context

• Home Visiting is a predominant service delivery mode in early intervention, birth to 3 services.– Early Head Start Programs– Part C, IDEA Services

• 80% of children received Part C services in the home (2005 Report to Congress)

• Only 30% of home visits were rated as – family-centered, participation-based versus – traditionally provided services (e.g., Campbell &

Sawyer, 2007; Peterson et al., 2007).


www.igdi.ku.edu Multiple Levels of Support for Early Communication

• Tier 1 – All Children– Home visitors provide general support and resources to parents to

encourage use of strategies to promote communication • Tier 2 – For Children who are below benchmark and making

less than expected communication growth– Individualize intervention decisions– Improve home language environment using participant-based

strategies, more frequent progress monitoring, measures of intervention fidelity

• Tier 3 – not making progress – may be Part C eligible– more intensive practice, modeling, additional strategies– add expert based services (e.g., SLP) to Tier 2


www.igdi.ku.edu

Using Evidence-based Practice

Dale Walker


www.igdi.ku.edu

• Importance of using effective, evidence-based interventions to promote communication

• Importance of exploring possible reasons for child not performing at expected levels

• Importance of deciding what the possible resources are to effectively deliver intervention

• Importance of monitoring intervention delivery to make sure that it is effective in promoting communication

Using effective interventions to promote communication


www.igdi.ku.edu

Selecting Intervention from ECI Dropdown Menu

• When ready to begin an intervention – Select intervention description from menu on

Child Data Entry Form– Select menu under Condition Change – Select intervention that best describes the

intervention


www.igdi.ku.edu


www.igdi.ku.edu

Child before and after intervention

Child’s Scores

Benchmark Trajectory

Slightly Below

Benchmark

Below Benchmark

Child’s Trajectories

Child Trajectories

Intervention or

condition Line


www.igdi.ku.edu Evaluating and monitoring intervention effectiveness

• Continue administering ECI monthly or quarterly • Look at Key Skill Elements and Total

Communication rates to check that they are moving toward benchmark

• Look at the slope of communication progress to determine if the slope is increasing

• Is there evidence that intervention has increased communication?

• If progress is not at expected rate, examine intervention and make necessary changes


www.igdi.ku.edu

Key Skill Elements: Gestures Graph


www.igdi.ku.eduKey Skill Elements: Vocalizations Graph


www.igdi.ku.edu Resources for Intervention Decision- Making

• Programs and interventionists able to select interventions of their choice and use ECI to monitor progress

• IGDI website provides resources for intervention for programs/interventionists who would like intervention resources

• Found that some programs and interventionists could benefit from more support for intervention decision making and generating intervention ideas that are individualized

• Developed and are in the process of testing an online decision making model to support individualization

• Indexed intervention recommendations from two sources to the ECI benchmarks to assist with individualization


www.igdi.ku.edu

1 W/min

ECI Key Skills Fitted Trajectories3V

/1.5Gmin


www.igdi.ku.edu Evidence-based Early Communication Interventions

• Incidental, Milieu, and Responsive Teaching Language Intervention research

• Evidence-based practices for home visitors– Language Intervention Tool Kit (Crowe, 2002)– Promoting Communication Strategies (Walker,

Small, Bigelow, Kirk & Webb, 2004)– Early Communication Indicator (ECI), the

communication IGDI


www.igdi.ku.edu

Making Strategy Determination Data-based

1. Helping gestures and vocalizations become words Child is communicating mostly with gestures and

vocalizations When single word fluency is less than 1 per minute and

gestures (1 to 1.5) and vocalizations (3.5 )2. Helping the child learn new words (expand

vocabulary) as they are becoming word users When single word fluency is less than 2.5 per minute

3. Helping the child combine words into sentences When multiple word fluency is less than 5.0 per minute Expanding and encouraging more multiple words as child

moves into fluency at 5 multiple words per minute


www.igdi.ku.edu

Practice Recommendations• In the Language Intervention Tool Kit, these

strategies are identified as Preverbal and are described on pages 13 – 21

• Feeding (p. 13 -14)• Diapering (p. 13, 15)• Bathing (pp 13, 16 & 19)• Reading (p. 13, 20)• Drawing/Writing (p. 13, 21)


www.igdi.ku.edu

Practice RecommendationsIn the Promoting Communication Manual, strategies

for children communicating mostly through gestures and vocalizations include:

• Following Child’s Lead (pp. 16 -17)• Commenting and Labeling (pp. 22 - 23)• Imitating and Expanding (pp. 28 - 29)• Using Questions (pp. 34 - 35)• Providing Positive Attention (pp. 46 - 47)• Providing Choices (pp. 52 – 53)


www.igdi.ku.eduHelping Gestures

and Vocalizations Become Words• Responding to child’s communication so the child learns

that they can get needs fulfilled and attention when they communicate

• Talking more and often to a child so that they hear words and labels for people, toys and activities of interest to them.

• Showing an interest in what the child is playing with, looking at, or exploring and commenting or labeling the toy or activity

• Expanding on the child’s vocalizations by repeating them back in words so child hears the words that are related to objects or activities of interest


www.igdi.ku.edu

Helping the Child Expand Vocabulary as they are Learning to Use Words

• These strategies give adults ideas on how to expand children’s vocabulary as they begin to use words. The types of strategies used to promote communication at this level include:– Labeling words children may use as they engage in a variety

of indoor and outdoor routines and activities– Commenting about what a child is doing or what the adult is

doing so the child hears words paired with actions– Expanding on the child’s use of a vocalization or word by

repeating the word correctly and adding another word to the sentence

– Pausing before giving a child the label for something so that the child has the opportunity to say it on their own

– Reading books with children in a manner that allows the child to point to and label pictures and to see words


www.igdi.ku.edu

Practice Recommendations• In the Language Intervention Tool kit, available

strategies for helping promote multiple word sentences are identified as Expanding Verbal. Strategies are available for increasing Talk during:

• Dressing (pp. 37, 38)• Eating (pp. 37, 39)• Inside Play (pp. 37, 40)• Reading (pp. 37, 41)• Writing (pp. 37, 42)• Math (pp. 37, 43)• Outdoor Play (pp. 37, 44)


www.igdi.ku.edu

Data-based Decision Making for Infants and Toddlers

Jay Buzhardt


www.igdi.ku.edu

Discussion Highlights• Making Online Decisions (MOD) – A model for

data-based decision making– What is it?– How is it used?

• Pilot implementation with Early Head Start– Challenges and future directions


www.igdi.ku.edu

Making Online Decisions (MOD)• The MOD is a web-based tool informed by the ECI that supports

data-based decision making and a general RtI model for infants and toddlers


www.igdi.ku.edu

How Does the MOD Help Service Providers Make Data-based Decisions?

• Quickly identifies children who are performing below benchmark on the ECI

• Prompts problem solving to determine why a child might be low on the ECI

• Recommends evidence-based, caregiver-delivered language strategies based on child’s ECI performance

• Provides tools for monitoring implementation fidelity• Reports whether or not the strategies are working;

and recommends what to do next


www.igdi.ku.edu

Case Example of the MOD

• You conduct an ECI with child and enter it into the online data system


www.igdi.ku.edu

Is There A Problem?• The system shows that this score is “Below

Benchmark”

Oyle, OlivePopeye’s EHS

Oyle, Olive


www.igdi.ku.edu

• The MOD asks if the assessment was ‘valid’– If invalid, do another ECI within two weeks– If valid, “Why Is It Happening” stage of the MOD is

initiated

Was the assessment valid?Is There A Problem?


www.igdi.ku.edu

Why Is It Happening?• Answer three brief questions to help determine why

this child’s language may be falling below benchmark– Medical issues, major family changes, or changes in her

daycare environment are considered

• If recent change or medical condition is identified…– Child moves to monthly ECIs

• If the cause of the problem is unknown…– Child moves to monthly ECIs– “What Should Be Done” is initiated

• Language Strategies are recommended immediately


www.igdi.ku.edu

What Should Be Done?• MOD recommends strategies and routines for the caregiver(s)

to try based on the child’s ECI key skill elements• Recommended strategies are indexed to

– Language Intervention Tool Kit– Promoting Communications Strategies Manual

Home visitor chooses routines he/she believes would be most appropriate for

the caregiver.


www.igdi.ku.edu

Is It Being Done?• On each subsequent home visit, home visitor completes an

implementation fidelity checklist– How much are they using the strategies?– Which ones do they like the most?– Are they having trouble using them? – Are they noticing any language improvement?

• Enters checklist into the MOD


www.igdi.ku.edu

Is It Working?• Three ECI’s after the caregiver(s) receive the

recommendations…– MOD analyzes ECI performance

• ECI before and after the recommendations were provided• ECI slope• Expected ECI performance six months from now


www.igdi.ku.edu

Is It Working?• After 3 more ECIs, MOD compares communication before and after,

makes recommendations• The “What Should Be Done” recommendations will adapt to reflect

changes in performance on the Key Skill Elements.

Manhattan, Mike

Manhattan, Mike


www.igdi.ku.edu

MOD Preliminary Implementation• Three Early Head Start programs throughout KS

– Home visitors with a case load ≥ 2 in each program randomly assigned to

1. MOD (N=18)2. No MOD (N=17)

• Monthly Monitoring IndicatorCumulative Record of Monthly Assessments

02468

1012141618

4/15

/2008

4/29

/2008

5/13

/2008

5/27

/2008

6/10

/2008

6/24

/2008

7/8/

2008

7/22

/2008

8/5/

2008

8/19

/2008

9/2/

2008

9/16

/2008

9/30

/2008

Assessment Date

Mo

nth

ly A

sses

smen

ts

Non-MOD

MOD


www.igdi.ku.edu

Future Directions

• More graphing options, permit users to include/exclude benchmark performance

• Phasing in more programs around Kansas into the MOD

• Allow for the use of other interventions in the MOD• IGDI assessments and MOD delivered via handheld

computers– Allow for more immediate “point-of-care”

recommendations


www.igdi.ku.edu

References• Campbell, P. H., & Sawyer, L. B. (2007). Supporting learning opportunities in natural settings

through participation-based services. Journal of Early Intervention, 29, 287-305.• Carta, J. J., Greenwood, C. R., Walker, D., Kaminski, R., Good, R., McConnell, S. R., et al. (2002).

Individual growth and development indicators (IGDIs): Assessment that guides intervention for young children. Young Exceptional Children Monograph Series, 4(15-28).

• Crowe, L. (2002). The Language Intervention Toolkit. Topeka, KS: Kansas Department of Social and Rehabilitative Services.

• Greenwood, C. R., Carta, J. J., Baggett, K., Buzhardt, J., Walker, D, Terry, B. (2007). Best Practices in Integrating Progress Monitoring and Response-to-Intervention Concepts Into Early Childhood Systems. In Best practices in School Psychology, V (A. Thomas & J. Grimes Eds.), pp. 535 – 548. National Association of School Psychologists: Bethesda, MD.

• Greenwood, C. R., Carta, J. J., Walker, D., & Hughes, K. (2006). Preliminary investigations of the application of the Early Communication Indicator (ECI) for infants and toddlers. Journal of Early Intervention, 28(3), 178-196.

• Peterson, C. A., Luze, G. J., Eshbaugh, E. M., Jeon, H., & Kantz, K. R. (2007). Enhancing parent-child interactions through home visiting: Promising practice or unfulfilled promise? Journal of Early Intervention, 29, 119-140.

• Walker, D., Carta, J. J., Greenwood, C., & Buzhardt, J. (2008). Individual Growth and Development Indicators: Their use in progress monitoring and intervention decision making in early education. Exceptionality, 16, 33-47.

• Walker, D., Small, C., Bigelow, K., Kirk, S., & Harjusola-Webb, S. (2004). Strategies for Promoting Communication and Language of Infants and Toddlers Manual. Juniper Gardens Children's Project, Schiefelbusch Institute for Life Span Studies, University of Kansas.

Documents

Individual Growth and Development Indicators for Infants and Toddlers Using Progress Monitoring to Support RTI Services for Infants and