Upload
stefano-basaglia
View
216
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ORI GIN AL PA PER
Individual adoption of convergent mobile phone in Italy
Stefano Basaglia Æ Leonardo Caporarello ÆMassimo Magni Æ Ferdinando Pennarola
Received: 8 June 2007 / Accepted: 27 November 2008 / Published online: 3 February 2009
� Springer-Verlag 2009
Abstract The present study integrates the technology acceptance and convergence
streams of research to develop and test a model of individual adoption of convergent
mobile technologies. Adopting structural equation modelling, we hypothesize that
relative advantage, effort expectancy, social influence and facilitating conditions
affect directly individual attitude and, indirectly the intention to use convergent
mobile technologies. The model explains a highly significant 53.2% of the variance
for individual attitude, while individual attitude accounts for 33.9% of the variance
in behavioral intention.
Keywords Convergence � Adoption � Mobile technologies � Attitude �Intention to use � L20
JEL Classification O33
Authors are listed alphabetically.
S. Basaglia � L. Caporarello (&) � M. Magni � F. Pennarola
Department of Management, Institute of Organization and Information Systems,
Bocconi University, Via Rontgen, 1, 20136 Milan, Italy
e-mail: [email protected]
M. Magni
e-mail: [email protected]
F. Pennarola
e-mail: [email protected]
S. Basaglia
Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration,
University of Bergamo, Via dei Caniana 2, 24127 Bergamo, Italy
e-mail: [email protected]
123
Rev Manag Sci (2009) 3:1–18
DOI 10.1007/s11846-009-0025-6
1 Introduction
Recent studies pointed out the importance of past research on individual adoption of
IT artifacts (e.g. Karahanna et al. 2006), which can be defined as material properties
packaged in some socially recognizable form such as hardware and/or software
(Orlikowski and Iacono 2001). The importance of investigating individuals’
behaviors toward an IT artifact can be traced back to the fact that initial investments
are often hindered by the way through which individuals use the target IT artifact.
Therefore, while information systems are developed to help individuals for
enhancing their productivity, to take better decisions, or to manage coordination
issues and so forth, the advantages cannot be exploited if the IT artifact is not adopted
and used accordingly to its potential (Agarwal 2000). In the last two decades, many
researchers developed theoretical and empirical models in the attempt of under-
standing such kind of phenomenon starting from the seminal work of Davis (1989)
who developed the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Recent work by
Venkatesh et al. (2003) developed an in depth literature review and integrated the
different theories of individual acceptance into a single model (Unified Theory of
Acceptance and Use of Technology or UTAUT), designed to provide a comprehen-
sive understanding of those factors that either enable or hinder IT artifact adoption
and use. Besides the presentation of a parsimonious theoretical framework for a
unified view of technology acceptance, Venkatesh et al. (2003) proposed the
directions for future research indicating that further work should attempt to identify
and test additional boundary conditions of the model in an attempt to provide an even
richer understanding of IT artifact adoption and usage behavior, considering different
artifacts. Despite this call for testing the UTAUT model in different contexts, there is
a lack of studies which tested the UTAUT in different contexts with few exceptions
(e.g. Hennington and Janz 2007). Therefore, referring to the call by Venkatesh et al.
(2003) the aim of the present study is twofold.
First, answering the call of Venkatesh et al. (2003) we would like to test the
UTAUT model in the context of a different IT artifact. In particular, the present
study offers a focus on convergent mobile phone (i.e. smartphone, PDAs, etc.). The
importance of studying convergent mobile phone adoption is evident because they
present some notable differences compared to traditional mobile phones. First, the
convergence of different media in a single IT artifact allows users to be ‘‘anytime,
anywhere’’ for accessing and exchanging digital Information (Fang et al. 2005).
This means that convergent mobile phone allows individuals to potentially exploit a
single artifact for managing different task without the disadvantage of compatibility
of different systems, and at the same time allows individuals to have a unique access
point to the digital environment. Second, practitioners and academics recognize that
these devices have high potential for exploiting its features from different
perspectives (Suprateek and Wells 2003), including malleability (Nambisan et al.
1999) and interpretive flexibility (Orlikowski 1992). In other words convergent
mobile phones may satisfy a wide range of needs in different domains (i.e. business,
education, healthcare, and so on) (Constantiou et al. 2007), and since their flexibility
for meeting the need of different users, they cannot be considered as a static
technology and their services have to be embraced by users to deploy all their
2 S. Basaglia et al.
123
potential benefits. Indeed, it appears that many potential applications and
functionalities are still untapped and are related to the individual behavior toward
these IT artifacts.
Second, the aim of the present study is to understand the effect of the UTAUT
constructs in the specific national context of Italy. In literature, there is a call for
studying the validity of IT artifact adoption models in specific national context
(Wejnert 2002; Gallivan and Srite 2005). The need to extend behavioral models in
IS to other contexts is corroborated by previous studies (Lee and Baskerville 2003)
because it allows to ensure the existence of a common frame of reference across the
original setting of the study (i.e., the United States) and the new setting (i.e., Italy).
At this point, Italy may be an appropriate setting. Italy is one of the European
nations that have most widely adopted mobile phone. The literature proposed
different explanations for this success, that is (1) Italians are more communicative
than other Europeans, (2) mobile phone has become a fashionable new commu-
nication artifact, (3) mobile phone responds to the feature of Italian sociality (i.e.
sense of spontaneity and flexibility) and it can be seen as a facilitator of social
relations (Fortunati 2002). Since these explanations refer to different constructs of
UTAUT, it is important to understand their ‘‘reality’’ and relative weights. Hence,
we follow the replication procedure for different countries highlighted by Venkatesh
and Ramesh (2006) for comparing the results of users behaviors across countries.
Therefore, since the primary focus of our theoretical argument involves data
collection in Italy, we needed to establish a common frame of reference across
settings (i.e., Italy and US) for designing a measurement instruments consistent
across countries and for grasping comparable expressions, metaphors, symbols, etc.
(Ghorpade et al. 1999; Van de Vijver and Leung 1997). According to Venkatesh and
Ramesh (2006) the comparison is possible only through careful replication of an
instrument or study in the new setting. Thus, the primary purpose of this study is to
present empirical evidence that individual beliefs exhibit significant impacts on
individual attitude and intention toward convergent mobile phone in Italy.
The remainder of this paper is structured as follows. The following two sections
describe the theoretical framework related to convergence and attitude theory. Next
we will present the theoretical model and the research hypotheses. Then, we will
present the methodology used to test the hypotheses, including the study context and
sample, constructs operationalization, and results. The last two sections discuss
results, and provide theoretical and practical implications. Limitations and future
research directions are also considered.
2 Theoretical framework
2.1 UTAUT and theory of reasoned action
Whereas the UTAUT integrates different theoretical perspective about the
individual adoption of IT artifacts it mainly relies on the overarching framework
of the theory of reasoned action (TRA, Fishbein and Ajzen 1975). The TRA derives
from the social psychology and posits that an individual behavioral intention toward
Individual adoption of convergent mobile phone in Italy 3
123
a specific behavior is the main antecedent of the occurrence of that behavior and can
be considered as a proxy of the behavior itself (Venkatesh and Davis 2000).
Behavioral intention is, in turn, predicted by the individual’s attitude toward the
focal behavior. According to Fishbein and Ajzen (1975), attitude can be defined as a
predisposition to respond in a consistently favorable or unfavorable manner with
respect to a given psychological object. The importance of individual attitude can be
traced back to its ability to predispose individual to action influencing individual’s
intentions (Ajzen 2001). Many models have been developed in order to explore the
relationship between attitude and individual action in different domains, such as
social psychology, sociology and organization. Besides these disciplines, the
concept of attitude received significant attention within the information system
domain, with particular focus on individual intention to use an IT artifac artifact (i.e.
Venkatesh and Davis 2000).
Since attitude has demonstrated its robustness for representing individual
intention to perform a specific behavior, it could also be used to understand
individual’s predisposition toward the adoption of convergent mobile phone.
According to the definition of attitude, and reframing it into the convergence domain,
we define attitude toward convergent mobile phone as the individual predisposition
toward a unique device that provide different digital features and services.
A critical issue can be traced back to the formation of individual attitude toward
convergent mobile phone. Previous literature points out that the development of a
person’s attitude is related to the formation of a set of individual’s beliefs about a
particular object, action, or event (Karahanna et al. 1999). According to Ajzen
(2001, p. 30), ‘‘each belief associates the object with a certain attribute, and aperson’s overall attitude toward an object is determined by the subjective values ofthe object’s attributes in interaction with the strength of the associations’’.
Previous studies on the IT artifact adoption provided a wide set of individual
beliefs which may affect the individual attitude toward a new IT artifact, influencing
its degree of adoption. When examining individual attitudes related to IT artifact,
and relying on Fishbein and Ajzen (1975) model, previous literature has also found
a robust positive relationship between attitudes and intention to perform target
behavior. Despite this aspect, the UTAUT considers a direct effect of beliefs on
individual intention (without taking into account the mediating role of individual
attitude). Given our specific research context we decided nevertheless to adopt a
more conservative interpretation of the theory of reasoned action (Fishbein and
Ajzen 1975). This explanation takes its roots on the marketing literature which
posits that individuals’ first reactions to a new product are mainly positive or
negative predispositions based upon individual’s feelings (Creusen and Schoormans
2005) which then lead to intentions toward the product.
Relying on the theoretical arguments of the TRA, the UTAUT integrates the 14
constructs from the previous literature in four main beliefs in the attempt of giving a
parsimonious understanding of the individual acceptance of technology. In
particular the UTAUT considers the following beliefs: performance expectancy,
effort expectancy, social influence, and facilitating conditions. Table 1 summarizes
the constructs and their meaning adopted by Venkatesh et al. (2003) for developing
the integrated model.
4 S. Basaglia et al.
123
2.2 Convergent mobile phones and UTAUT
Convergence is a complex concept since it is characterized by different meanings.
Its most general and basic sense is the following: the tendency for everything to
become more like everything else (Boorstin 1978). During the Seventies, the word
convergence has been used with reference to what Alan Stone (1989) called ‘‘a
marriage made in heaven’’ between computers, and telecommunications. By the
1990, the word convergence has been applied to the development of digital
technology, and its meaning concerns the integration of text, numbers, images and
sound (i.e. different elements in the media which have been considered separately
before the development and diffusion of digital technology) (Briggs and Burke
2000). Castells (1996), in his work about information society, considers conver-gence of microelectronics, telecommunications and computers as one of the five
characteristics of the information technology paradigm on which the network
society is based.
Some authors (e.g. Greenstein and Khanna 1997; Danowski and Choi 1998)
focus on convergence in terms of industry transformation (i.e. convergence is an
industry convergence). That transformation is caused by the development and
diffusion of technology integration (i.e. the integration of telecommunications,
publishing, broadcasting, cable, film, computer software and data processing service
industries) on one side, and, the deregulation policy that redesign the boundaries
between industries (Chon et al. 2003) on the other side.
Our definition of convergence which considers ‘‘the coming together ofpreviously distinct products which employ digital technologies’’ (Yoffie 1996,
p. 33). This definition is more technology-oriented and it is consistent with the
conceptualization of IT artifact previously used in the IT acceptance research
(Orlikowski and Iacono 2001). Since the IT artifact is considered the application of
IT to enable and support some tasks within a context, it should not be considered as
something that is unitary, unified or uniform. On the contrary, IT artifacts are
characterized by interconnections and complex interdependencies on the techno-
logical, contextual and social sides (Benbasat and Zmud 2003). IT artifacts are both
material and social because they are constructed and used by people. Moreover,
people may modify IT artifacts in a dialectical way, through their perceptions and
use (Orlikowski and Iacono 2000).
Table 1 UTAUT constructs (adapted from Venkatesh et al. 2003)
UTAUT construct Construct definition
Performance
expectancy
The degree to which an individual believes that using the IT artifact will help him or
her to attain performance gains
Effort expectancy The degree of ease associated with the use of the IT artifact
Social influence The degree to which an individual perceives that important others believe he/she has
to use the IT artifact
Facilitating
conditions
The degree to which an individual believes that an organizational and technical
infrastructure exists to support the use of the IT artifact
Individual adoption of convergent mobile phone in Italy 5
123
Assuming this conceptualization of convergence, it is possible to identify two
kinds of convergence (Greenstein and Khanna 1997): convergence in substitutes and
convergence in complements. Convergence in substitutes is based on interchange-
ability between products and/or services. It occurs when different firms develop
products and/or services with features and characteristics that become increasingly
similar to the features of certain other products and/or services. On the other hand,
convergence in complements is based on the concept of ‘‘use in concert’’. Two
products and/or services converge in complements when the products and/or
services work better together than separately or when they work better now than
they worked together formerly or when they perform a new function that neither can
do alone.
This work focuses on convergence in terms of convergent mobile phone. It is
based on the technology side of convergence using the lens of IT artifact literature.
According to this paper, a convergent mobile phone is an IT artifact that (1)
converges in complements, and (2) enables different features (i.e. personal
information management, music management, image management, etc.), and tasks
(communication, data transfer, internet browsing, coordination, etc.).
Consistent with the theoretical background of previous paragraph, Fig. 1 depicts
our research model. We propose that attitude toward convergent mobile phone
directly influences the intention to use convergent mobile phone. Moreover, we
propose that attitude toward convergent mobile phone can be traced back to four
individual beliefs about convergent mobile phone: performance expectancy, effort
expectancy, social influence, and facilitating conditions.
Previous research on adoption points out the importance of attitude toward an IT
artifact. In particular it is widely recognized both from a theoretical and empirical
perspective that intention to engage in a behavior is determined by an individual’s
PerformanceExpectancy
EffortExpectancy
SocialInfluence
FacilitatingConditions
Attitude toward convergent
mobiletechnologies
Intention to use convergent
mobiletechnologies
PerceivedKnowledge
Gender
Control variables
Fig. 1 Research model
6 S. Basaglia et al.
123
attitude toward that behavior (Karahanna et al. 1999). Thus, applying this rationale
to our context we can derive that attitude toward convergent mobile phone is
positively related to its intention to use. Formally,
Hypothesis 1 Intention to use is positively related to the attitude towards
convergent mobile.
2.2.1 Performance expectancy
Performance expectancy is defined as the degree to which a new IT artifact is
perceived as being able to provide better outcome derived from its use (Venkatesh
et al. 2003). Several studies underscored that individuals are more likely to develop
a positive attitude toward a new IT artifact if they belief that the new artifact could
lead to concrete benefits in comparison with existing ones (Karahanna et al. 2002).
For example, Rogers (2003) proposes a case study about the diffusion of mobile
phones in Finland. Results pointed out by Venkatesh et al. (2003) suggest the
critical role of performance expectancy for stimulating the adoption of mobile
phones. Moreover, Tornatzky and Klein’s (1982) in their meta-analysis point out
that the perception of performance enhancement is the most salient driver in the
process of technology adoption. Convergent mobile phone have been developed in
order to provide new features and services if compared with traditional mobile
phone (such as: e-mailing, multimedia applications), thus it can be perceived as a
source of concrete benefits enhancing the individual attitude toward it. In other
words, individual performance expectancy in the context of convergent mobile
phone is shaped by the users’ belief that those IT artifacts allow them to perform a
wide range of tasks using a single device, increasing their ability to coordinate their
tasks and to increase their productivity. In the Italian setting, this means that
convergent mobile phone is a better facilitator of communication and social
relations than traditional mobile phone. Thus the performance gained through using
one convergent mobile phone is superior to the use of multiple traditional stand
alone devices.
Therefore, we propose the following:
Hypothesis 2 Attitude toward convergent mobile phone is positively related to
performance expectancy.
2.2.2 Effort expectancy
According to Venkatesh et al. (2003), effort expectancy is defined as the degree of
ease associated with the use of the IT artifact. The conceptualization of effort
expectancy can be traced back to the concept of ‘‘ease of use’’, which indicates the
extent to which a person believes that using the IT artifact is effortless (Davis 1989).
The importance of effort expectancy is critical in the introduction of a new IT
artifact. In fact, the adoption process of a new IT artifact can be constrained and
even fail when factors related to ease of use are not taken into account by IT artifact
designers (Orlikowski 1992). Therefore, developers should take into account in a
simultaneous fashion both the instrumental and the effortless side of the IT artifact.
Individual adoption of convergent mobile phone in Italy 7
123
Considering the context of convergent mobile phone, usability problems that
include speed of data retrieval, non-intuitive data input, slow login time, an inability
to interact with the different features of the system which may hinder the
exploitation of the main potential of using a single device for performing different
tasks. For example, the difficulty of switching from an application to another using
the same device may negatively affect individuals’ attitude toward using a single
device for performing different tasks. On the other side, the absence of cognitive
effort in interacting with the convergent mobile phone would allow users to fully
exploit the potential of the different functionalities offered by the IT artifact. This is
particularly true within a technophobic context like the Italian one.
Accordingly,
Hypothesis 3 Attitude toward convergent mobile phone is positively related to
effort expectancy.
2.2.3 Social influence
Social influence is defined as the degree to which an individual perceives that
important others believe he or she should use a new technology (Venkatesh et al.
2003). In the IT adoption domain has been developed a wide range of
conceptualization of social influence. In particular social influence occurs for two
main reasons: on one hand, a normative pressure (e.g. Venkatesh 2000), on the other
hand, through a social interaction phenomenon (Fulk 1993; Burkhardt and Brass
1990). The normative perspective is based upon the ‘‘person’s perception that mostpeople who are important to her think she should or should not perform thebehaviour in question’’ (Fishbein and Ajzen 1975, p. 3). The social information
processing (Salancik and Pfeffer 1978) states that individuals’ beliefs and behaviors
are shaped by the social context in which they are embedded. In particular, social
information processing is based upon the assumption that the characteristics of a
certain situation or object are constructed through social interaction (Salancik and
Pfeffer 1978).
Like other new consumer products, convergent mobile phones are an ‘‘experi-
ence good’’ that consumer must be experienced to value. Convergent mobile phones
are far more ambiguous about their potential uses (Kraut et al. 1999) if compared
with other convergent devices (e.g. alarm clock). Because of that individuals are
more likely to rely on others’ opinions and beliefs. Our research context refers to a
non-mandatory setting. Indeed, the normative approach is particularly significant in
mandatory settings (Lewis et al. 2003). Conversely, in a non-mandatory setting and
in the early stage of adoption, informal networks play a pivotal role in influencing
the individual process of IT artifact adoption (Rogers 2003; Venkatesh and Morris
2000). In particular, opinions of social referents may enhance the individual’s
predisposition toward a new IT artifact. Indeed, according to Lewis et al. (2003)
individuals may incorporate the opinions of important others either transforming
them in their own beliefs, or through a process of imitation. In the context of
convergent mobile phones the social interaction among individuals may represent a
way through which users exchange useful information about the potential technical,
8 S. Basaglia et al.
123
social, and symbolic benefits of the system, and it enhances the Italian fashion
components of mobile phone. Therefore, messages received from important others
are likely to influence individuals’ attitude concerning the expected outcomes of
technology use.
These factors are consistent with the formally,
Hypothesis 4 Attitude toward convergent mobile phone is positively related to
social influence.
2.2.4 Facilitating conditions
Relying on the definition provided by Venkatesh et al. (2003) we consider facilitating
conditions as the degree to which individuals believe that social resources exist to
support them in interacting with convergent mobile phone. Facilitating conditions
have been widely analyzed in the workplace setting (Gallivan et al. 2005; Magni and
Pennarola 2008; Venkatesh et al. 2003) and have been conceptualized in terms of
training and provision of organizational support. However, in our context, since we
are not analyzing it in an organizational setting we suggest that the support may rely
on the personal social network of each individual rather than on institutional support
(Wejnert 2002; Rogers 2003). Formally,
Hypothesis 5 Attitude toward convergent mobile phone is positively related to
facilitating conditions.
3 Method
3.1 Sample, data collection, and design
Italy, together with Finland, Denmark, Sweden and South Korea, is one of the
leading Nations with the highest rates of mobile phones adoption (124% of the
population). In Italy the overall number of active SIM cards (Subscriber
Identification Module) was over 70 millions in 2005, while the number of active
U-SIM cards (i.e. SIM cards capable to support UMTS network services) was over
10 millions. The number of mobile phone users is equal to 44.4 millions of people.
The Value-Added Services (VAS) (e.g. music download, online gaming,
Multimedia Message Service, etc.), represent the services which converge into
the new generation of mobile phones. This segment in the Italian market of mobile
telecommunications is showing interesting performance improvement. In fact, the
growth of its market value has been about 50% between 2003 and 2005. Moreover,
in 2005 the VAS market value was equal to 3,310 million of euros, which represents
the 19% of the Italian market value of mobile telecommunications.
These evidences about mobile technology diffusion and the value of VAS market
provide a clear image of the convergent mobile phone development and diffusion.
103 students from four Italian large universities voluntarily participated in this
study. According with previous studies in this research stream the sample size could
be acceptable (Lewis et al. 2003; Ko et al. 2005) and the involvement of students
Individual adoption of convergent mobile phone in Italy 9
123
does not lead to significantly different results in studying the adoption of new IT
artifacts (e.g. Agarwal and Karahanna 2000). 47% of the respondents were male,
and 53% were female.
We chose to test our model on convergent mobile phones for three main reasons:
(1) Convergent mobile phones has been continuously developed and re-invented
thanks to a constant stream of new features (Rogers 2003). In particular, the shift
from GSM technology to UMTS technology represents an important step towards
convergence. (2) According to previous studies (Greenstein and Khanna 1997),
convergent mobile phones can be considered example of one of the two primary
kinds of convergence defined above (i.e. convergence in substitution). (3) In our
study individuals’ use of convergent mobile phones is volitional rather than
mandatory in the situation we studied, allowing a better understanding of their
attitude formation.
3.2 Measurement
We used a standardized survey to gather the research data. Item scales utilized a five
point, ‘‘strongly agree to strongly disagree’’ Likert response format unless
differently indicated.
In the following section we provide a general discussion of the psychometric
properties displayed by scales, and an exemplar item. The full set of items used in
the study is shown in Appendix Table 4.
Intention to use was assessed through the three item scale developed by
Venkatesh and Davis (2000). An exemplar item is ‘‘I intend to use the convergent
mobile phones in the next three months’’.
Individual’s attitude was measured with four items adopted from Karahanna
et al. (1999). An exemplar item is ‘‘Using the convergent mobile phones is a good
idea’’.
Performance expectancy was assessed by adapting a four item scale developed
and validated by Moore and Benbasat (1991). An exemplar item is: ‘‘Convergent
mobile phones increase my effectiveness in my daily activities’’.
Effort expectancy was collected with four items adopted from Venkatesh et al.
(2003). An exemplar item is ‘‘I would find the convergent mobile phones easy to
use’’.
Social influence was assessed through two items from Venkatesh et al. (2003),
and two items from Lewis et al. (2003). An exemplar item is ‘‘People who are
important to me think that I should use the convergent mobile phones’’.
The existence of facilitating conditions was measured with three items adopted
from Venkatesh et al. (2003). An exemplar item is ‘‘My friends and colleagues are
available for helping me with convergent mobile phones difficulties’’.
3.2.1 Control variable
In testing our model we included two control variables––gender and perceived
knowledge––which prior research had suggested might affect the interaction
between individual and technology. We decided to include gender because of
10 S. Basaglia et al.
123
mixed findings about the role of gender in the human-computer interaction domain.
While some studies report that differences exist in the decision making process of
technology adoption between men and women (e.g. Venkatesh and Morris 2000;
Ahuja and Thatcher 2005), still other studies report no effects for gender on
individuals’ interaction with a technology (e.g. Agarwal and Karahanna 2000). We
measured gender with a single item asking whether participants were male or female.
The second control variable (perceived knowledge) assessed the individuals’
belief that he/she has the knowledge necessary to use convergent mobile phones.
We controlled for this variable because from one hand previous research pointed out
the influence of perceived knowledge on individuals’ adoption process (Brown and
Venkatesh 2005). Conversely, other research points out that in the early stage of
adoption individuals are more focused on the novelty of the product rather than on
their ability to interact with it (Rogers 2003). Perceived knowledge was assessed
through two items adapted by Brown and Venkatesh (2005).
3.3 Psychometric properties of measures
In order to test our research model we followed the two steps strategy presented by
Agarwal and Karahanna (2000). The first step focused on confirmatory factor
analysis to assess the psychometric properties of adopted scales. During the second
step, described in the following paragraph, we tested our research hypotheses
focusing on the analysis of the structural relationships. For both the steps we
adopted PLS, a latent structural equations modelling technique. Compared to factor-
based covariance fitting approach for latent structural modelling (e.g. LISREL), PLS
is a component-based approach which allows predictive applications. Indeed,
according to Chin (1998) since the approach estimates the latent variables as exact
linear combinations of the observed measures, it avoids the indeterminacy problem
and provides an exact definition of component scores. Thus, the statistical objective
of PLS is similar to the linear regression one (showing an R-square for pointing out
the variance explained and presenting the significant t-values for rejecting the null
hypotheses). However, if compared to the linear regression technique, PLS offers
the advantage of its robustness with relatively small sample sizes and minimal
requirements for distributions (Chin 1998). These considerations lead us to think
that PLS is suitable for our study.
The psychometric properties of the scales have been tested through items
loadings, discriminant validity and internal consistency. We examined the internal
consistency for all scales calculating the composite reliability index. As shown in
Table 2 each scale displays an acceptable composite reliability coefficient ([0.70)
(Fornell and Bookstein 1982).
As can be seen from the factor analysis results reported in Table 3, all items
loaded respectfully on their corresponding factor. Moreover, to assess the
discriminant validity the square root of the average variance extracted (AVE)
should be higher than the interconstruct correlations. As indicated in the Table 2 all
the constructs share more variance with their indicators than other constructs.
Overall, we conclude that the measures testing the model all display good
psychometric properties.
Individual adoption of convergent mobile phone in Italy 11
123
3.4 The structural model
Figure 2 presents the results of the PLS analyses that we conducted to test our
research hypotheses. The exogenous variables explain a highly significant 53.2% of
the variance for individual attitude. At the same time, individual attitude accounts
for 33.9% of the variance in behavioral intention. The first hypothesis stating a
positive influence of attitude on intention is strongly supported (coeff. = 0.582,
p \ 0.001). The second hypothesis, positing that the performance expectancy has a
positive influence on attitude toward convergence (coeff. = 0.477, p \ 0.001) is
strongly supported. Further, hypothesis 3, predicting that effort expectancy has a
Table 2 Descriptive statistics, reliabilities, and correlation matrix
Mean SD Composite reliability RA EE ATT SI FC INT
RA 2.96 1.03 0.91 0.78
EE 3.36 0.96 0.94 0.45 0.79
ATT 2.99 1.01 0.90 0.61 0.49 0.70
SI 2.54 0.98 0.89 0.43 0.24 0.31 0.67
FC 3.28 1.00 0.90 0.17 0.39 0.44 0.29 0.82
INT 2.68 1.19 0.90 0.70 0.54 0.56 0.39 0.37 0.76
Table 3 Confirmatory factor analysis
RA EE ATT SI FC INT
RA1 0.86 0.49 0.51 0.30 0.08 0.63
RA2 0.93 0.42 0.56 0.42 0.15 0.66
RA3 0.83 0.27 0.52 0.39 0.22 0.52
EE1 0.41 0.84 0.46 0.29 0.41 0.49
EE2 0.36 0.89 0.43 0.20 0.43 0.49
EE3 0.43 0.94 0.45 0.19 0.31 0.50
EE4 0.40 0.88 0.41 0.19 0.24 0.44
ATT1 0.62 0.45 0.77 0.20 0.33 0.58
ATT2 0.53 0.43 0.84 0.39 0.32 0.49
ATT3 0.47 0.33 0.88 0.19 0.42 0.42
ATT4 0.45 0.44 0.85 0.24 0.39 0.38
SI1 0.33 0.15 0.24 0.80 0.15 0.18
SI2 0.31 0.16 0.26 0.88 0.20 0.23
SI3 0.35 0.18 0.26 0.81 0.37 0.41
SI4 0.40 0.28 0.24 0.78 0.23 0.41
FC1 0.18 0.37 0.41 0.25 0.88 0.31
FC2 0.12 0.32 0.36 0.27 0.88 0.34
INT1 0.59 0.46 0.60 0.41 0.37 0.89
INT2 0.57 0.50 0.38 0.18 0.30 0.80
INT3 0.66 0.46 0.48 0.41 0.30 0.92
12 S. Basaglia et al.
123
positive influence on individual attitude is supported too (coeff. = 0.256, p \ 0.01).
Hypothesis 4 considering the effect of social influence on individual attitude is not
supported. However, hypothesis 5 positing that facilitating conditions have a
positive influence on attitude toward convergent mobile technologies is strongly
supported (coeff. = 0.331, p \ 0.001). Moreover control variables do not show any
significant influence on individuals’ attitude.
4 Discussion and implications
The present research firstly underscored the importance of emergent phenomenon of
convergence in the Italian context. In particular we have focused on the study of
convergent mobile phones due to its increasing diffusion in our context. Second
from a deep literature review about the process of new IT artifact adoption, we
proposed a theoretical model in order to understand the factors which influence the
individuals’ attitude toward convergent mobile phones and their intention to use.
Third, this model was empirically tested using the data collected through a
structured questionnaire.
Our test both provides some support for the overall model and the unexpected lack
of significance of social influence on individual attitude. In particular, these results
underscore the important role played by performance expectancy. This result
underscores the utilitarian perspective in shaping individuals’ attitude toward a new
IT artifact (Karahanna et al. 1999) and this finding is consistent with the real learning
PerformanceExpectancy
EffortExpectancy
SocialInfluence
FacilitatingConditions
Attitude toward convergent
mobile technologies
(0.532)
Intention to use convergent
mobile technologies
(0.339)
PerceivedKnowledge
Gender
Control variables
0.477***
-0.156-0.091
0.582***
0.256**
0.004
0.331***
Notes: - Numbers represent path coefficient- ** significant at p <.01- ***significant at p<.001- Variance explained in dependent variables is shown in parentheses
Fig. 2 PLS results
Individual adoption of convergent mobile phone in Italy 13
123
point of view in which individuals can clearly grasp the connection between actions
and outcomes (Levitt and March 1988). Moreover, it is counterintuitive that social
influence does not have any significant impact on individuals’ attitude toward a new
IT artifact. In particular, since mobile phone is characterized by a fashion component
within Italian context, we expected that social influence played a pivotal role in Italy.
This aspect can be traced back to the controversial role of social influence in studying
the process of IT artifact adoption. The lack of significance can be explained by: (1)
our sample is composed by young individuals. Indeed, other studies (e.g. Morris and
Venkatesh 2000) have found that social influence is less significant for younger
people. (2) Individuals that intend to adopt are driven by a better instrumental
consciousness and are less sensitive to informal channels of influence (Rogers 2003).
This consideration is consistent with Venkatesh et al. (2003) explanation for the
equivocal results reported in the literature. In particular, they point out that social
influences change during the overall diffusion process. Our results do not refuse the
importance of social environment. In fact, as noted above, the social environment is
not significant from an influential point of view but plays a fundamental role as a
locus for supporting individuals in their potential experience of their interaction with
the convergent mobile phones. This means that for developing a positive feeling
toward convergent mobile phones individuals should belief that they can rely on the
technical support of their informal network. This reinforces the utilitarian point of
view previously underlined.
Finally, the positive influence of effort expectancy confirms the critical role
played by the IT artifact ease of use. In fact, individuals who do not perceive a high
cognitive effort in interacting with a new IT artifact are more likely to develop
positive attitude toward the innovation.
The findings from this research also have implications for managerial practice.
One fundamental implication derives from viewing attitude toward using convergent
mobile phones as a key-factor, as confirmed by our analysis results, to influence in a
significant way the individual intention to use convergent mobile phones.
Managers who are designer of new features or services for convergent mobile
phones must be aware of the behavioral aspects of that kind of technologies.
Managers have to face a threefold challenge: first, to clearly provide potential
users the benefits from the use of convergent mobile phones; second, to emphasize
the features that fit better with the specific national context in which the new IT
artifact is introduced; third, to reduce as much as possible the users’ effort they
should apply to understand and use the convergent mobile technologies.
A last implication regards the social influence on the attitude toward using
convergent mobile phone. According to both the evidences from literature reviews
and our model and analysis results, managers must consider the diffusion process
stage in which this kind of IT artifacts is positioned. Introducing a new IT artifact
will capture the interest of some users, early adopters, but some others probably will
join later (followers). That suggests to managers to focus firstly on early adopters’
segment because of their general positive attitude toward using IT artifacts. Then, as
our results analysis confirm, managers have to provide users some social resources
with the scope to support individuals toward the interaction with the convergent
mobile phones.
14 S. Basaglia et al.
123
4.1 Limitations and directions for future research
As with any empirical field study, this work has limitations. First of all, since the
research design is cross sectional causality among variables should be inferred by
theoretical reasoning rather then from over time responses. Second, the model relies
on single source of data, the participants themselves. While consistent with many
previous studies on user-technology interaction (Agarwal and Karahanna 2000;
Lewis et al. 2003; Venkatesh and Davis 2000), use of a single data source
nevertheless raises the threat of systematic bias in user responses.
Finally, to the extent that convergent mobile phone is a highly specific device,
our results and implications may not fully generalize to other IT artifact. However,
as we explained above we believe that the characteristics of the convergent mobile
phones are consistent with a current trend of high malleability and flexibility. Thus
we do not think that the effects of this single IT artifact would affect the
generalizability of our findings.
Some issues for future research emerge from this study. In particular, future
research should delve more deeply into the characteristics of the user and its
context. First of all, it would be interesting to compare attitude and intention of
younger people with attitude and intention of older people, in order to address a
cross-age analysis. Second, it would be worth studying not only the biological sex,
but also the gender identity of the user from a socio-psychological point of view.
Therefore, future research should go beyond the dichotomous distinction between
male and female. Moreover, future research could adopt a longitudinal perspective
in order to compare attitude and intention at different stages of adoption process.
Third, a cross-country analysis would be useful for understanding the cultural
dimensions that can affect the adoption process (Gallivan and Srite 2005; Wejnert
2002). Finally, since the robustness of UTAUT future studies should move toward a
holistic perspective in studying the adoption of convergent mobile phones and
taking into account hedonic variables (e.g. playfulness, cognitive absorption).
Appendix
Table 4 Constructs and items
Constructs Items
Performance expectancy I would find convergent mobile technologiesa useful in
my daily activities
Convergent mobile technologies increase my
effectiveness in my daily activities
Using the convergent mobile technologies increases my
productivity
If I use the convergent mobile technologies I will
increase my chances of getting a raise
Individual adoption of convergent mobile phone in Italy 15
123
References
Agarwal R (2000) Individual acceptance of information technologies. In: Zmud RW (ed) Framing the
domains of it management: projecting the future from the past. Pinnaflex Educational Resources,
Cincinnati, pp 85–104
Agarwal R, Karahanna E (2000) Time flies when you’re having fun: cognitive absorption and beliefs
about information technology usage. MIS Q 24(4):665–694
Ahuja MK, Thatcher JB (2005) Moving beyond intentions and toward the theory of trying: effects of
work environment and gender on post-adoption information technology use. MIS Q 29(3):427–459
Ajzen I (2001) Nature and operation of attitudes. Annu Rev Psychol 52:27–58
Benbasat I, Zmud R (2003) The identity crisis within the is discipline: defining and communicating the
discipline’s core properties. MIS Q 27(2):183–194
Table 4 continued
Constructs Items
Effort expectancy My interaction with the convergent mobile technologies
will be clear and understandable
It would be easy for me to become skilful at using the
convergent mobile technologies
I would find the convergent mobile technologies easy to
use
Learning to use the convergent mobile technologies is
easy for me
Social influence People who influence me think that I should use the
convergent mobile technologies
People who are important to me think that I should use
the convergent mobile technologies
My friends and colleagues think that it is useful to use
the convergent mobile technologies
In general, opinions of my friends and colleagues are
important to me
Facilitating conditions My friends and colleagues are available for helping me
with convergent mobile technologies difficulties
I could accomplish my daily activities using the
convergent mobile technologies if I could call
someone for help if I got stuck
Attitude toward convergent mobile
technologies
Using the convergent mobile technologies is a good
idea
The convergent mobile technologies makes my daily
activities more interesting
Interacting with convergent mobile technologies is fun
I like interacting with convergent mobile technologies
Intention to use convergent mobile
technologies
I intend to use convergent mobile technologies in the
next three months
I predict I would use convergent mobile technologies in
the next three months
I plan to use convergent mobile technologies in the next
three months
a In this study we intend ‘‘convergent mobile technologies’’ as ‘‘convergent mobile phones’’, such as
smartphone, PDAs, etc
16 S. Basaglia et al.
123
Briggs A, Burke P (2000) A social history of the media. From Gutemberg to the internet. Blackwell
Publishers, Oxford
Brown SA, Venkatesh V (2005) Model of adoption of technology in households: a baseline model test
and extension incorporating household life cycle. MIS Q 29(3):399–426
Burkhardt ME, Brass DJ (1990) Changing patterns or patterns of change: the effects of a change in
technology on social network structure and power. Adm Sci Q 35(1):104–128
Castells M (1996) The rise of the network society. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford
Chin W (1998) Issues and opinions on structural equation modeling. MIS Q 22(1):7–10
Chon BS, Choi JH, Barnett GA, Danowski JA, Joo S (2003) A structural analysis of media
convergence: cross-industry mergers and acquisitions in the information industries. J Media Econ
16(3):141–157
Constantiou ID, Damsgaard J, Knutsen L (2007) The four incremental steps toward advanced mobile
service adoption. Commun ACM 50(6):51–55
Creusen MEH, Schoormans JPL (2005) The different roles of product appearance in consumer choice. J
Prod Innova Manage 22(1):63–81
Danowski JA, Choi JH (1998) Convergence in the information industries. Telecommunications,
broadcasting and data processing 1981–1996. In: Sawhney H, Barnett GA (eds) Progress in
communication sciences, vol 15. Ablex, Stamford, CT, pp 125–150
Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information
technology. MIS Q 13(3):318–340
Fang X, Chan S, Brzezinski J, Xu S (2005) Moderating effects of task type on wireless technology
acceptance. J Manage Inf Syst 22(3):123–157
Fishbein M, Ajzen I (1975) Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and
research. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA
Fornell C, Bookstein F (1982) Two structural equation models: Lisrel and pls applied to consumer exit-
voice theory. J Market Res 19(3):440–452
Fortunati L (2002) Italy: stereotypes, true and false. In: Katz James E, Aakhus Mark A (eds) Perpetual
contact. Mobile communication, private talk, public performance. Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge, pp 42–62
Fulk J (1993) Social construction of communication technology. Acad Manage J 36(5):921–951
Gallivan M, Srite M (2005) Information technology and culture: identifying fragmentary and holistic
perspectives of culture. Inf Organ 15(4):295–338
Gallivan MJ, Spitler VK, Koufaris M (2005) Does information technology training really matter? A social
information processing analysis of coworkers’ influence on IT usage in the workplace. J Manage Inf
Syst 22(1):153–192
Ghorpade J, Hattrup K, Lackritz JR (1999) The use of personality measures in cross-cultural research: a
test of three personality scales across two countries. J Appl Psychol 84(5):670–679
Greenstein S, Khanna T (1997) What does industry convergence mean? In: Yoffie DB (ed) Competing in
the age of digital convergence. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA
Hennington AH, Janz BD (2007) Information systems and healthcare: physician adoption of electronic
medical records: applying the Utaut model in a healthcare context. Commun AIS Issue 19:60–80
Karahanna E, Straub DW, Chervany NL (1999) Information technology adoption across time: a cross-
sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS Q 23(2):183–213
Karahanna E, Ahuja M, Srite M, Galvin J (2002) Individual differences and relative advantage: the case
of GSS. Decisi Support Syst 32(4):327–341
Karahanna E, Agarwal R, Angst C (2006) Reconceptualizing compatibility beliefs in technology
acceptance research. MIS Q 30(4):781–804
Ko D-G, Kirsch LJ, King WR (2005) Antecedents of knowledge transfer from consultants to clients in
enterprise system implementations. MIS Q 29(1):59–85
Kraut R, Mukhopadhyay T, Szczypula J, Kiesler S, Scherlis B (1999) Information and communication:
alternative uses of the internet in households. Inf Syst Res 10(4):287–303
Lee A, Baskerville RL (2003) Generalizing generalizability in information systems research. Inf Syst Res
14(3):221–243
Levitt B, March JG (1988) Organizational learning. Ann Rev Soc 14:319–338
Lewis W, Agarwal R, Sambamurthy V (2003) Sources of influence on beliefs about information
technology use: an empirical study of knowledge workers. MIS Q 27(4):657–678
Magni M, Pennarola F (2008) Intra-organizational relationships and technology acceptance. Int J Inf Man
28(6):517–523
Individual adoption of convergent mobile phone in Italy 17
123
Moore GC, Benbasat I (1991) Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an
information technology innovation. Inf Syst Res 2(3):192
Morris MG, Venkatesh V (2000) Age differences in technology adoption decisions: implications for a
changing work force. Pers Psychol 53(2):375–403
Nambisan S, Agarwal R, Tanniru M (1999) Organizational mechanisms for enhancing user innovation in
information technology. MIS Q 23(3):365–395
Orlikowski W (1992) The duality of technology: rethinking the concept of technology in organizations.
Organ Sci 3(3):398–427
Orlikowski W, Iacono CS (2000) The truth is not out there: an enacted view of the ‘‘digital economy’’. In:
Brynjolfsson E, Kahin B (eds) Understanding the digital economy: data, tools, and research. The
MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Orlikowski WJ, Iacono CS (2001) Research commentary: desperately seeking the ‘‘it’’ in it research-a call
to theorizing the IT artifact. Inf Syst Res 12(2):121–134
Rogers EM (2003) Diffusion of innovations, fifth edn. The Free Press, New York
Salancik GR, Pfeffer J (1978) A social information approach to job attitudes and task design. Adm Sci Q
23:224–252
Stone A (1989) Wrong number: the breakup of AT&T. Basic Books, New York
Suprateek S, Wells JD (2003) Understanding mobile handheld device use and adoption. Commun ACM
46(12):35–40
Taylor S, Todd PA (1995) Assessing IT usage: the role of prior experience. MIS Q 19(4):561–570
Tornatzky LG, Klein KJ (1982) Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption implementation: a
meta-analysis of findings. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 29(1):28–44
van de Vijver F, Leung K (1997) Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. Sage
Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA
Venkatesh V (2000) Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and
emotion into the technology acceptance model. Inf Syst Res 11(4):342–365
Venkatesh V, Davis FD (2000) A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model four
longitudinal field studies. Manag Sci 46(2):186–204
Venkatesh V, Morris MG (2000) Why don’t men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence,
and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Q 24(1):115–139
Venkatesh V, Ramesh V (2006) Web and wireless site usability: understanding differences and modeling
use. MIS Q 30(1):181–206
Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD (2003) User acceptance of information technology:
toward a unified view. MIS Q 27(3):425–478
Wejnert B (2002) Integrating models of diffusion of innovations: a conceptual framework. Ann Rev Soc
28:297–326
Yoffie DB (1996) Competing in the age of digital convergence. Calif Manag Rev 38(4):31–54
18 S. Basaglia et al.
123