21
Indirect effects of invasive species removal devastate World Heritage Islands Bergstrom et al., 2009, Journal of Applied Ecology

Indirect effects of invasive species removal devastate World Heritage Islands Bergstrom et al., 2009, Journal of Applied Ecology

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Indirect effects of invasive species removal devastate World Heritage Islands Bergstrom et al., 2009, Journal of Applied Ecology

Indirect effects of invasive species removal devastate World

Heritage IslandsBergstrom et al., 2009, Journal of

Applied Ecology

Page 2: Indirect effects of invasive species removal devastate World Heritage Islands Bergstrom et al., 2009, Journal of Applied Ecology

“Biological invasions can lead to large-scale alterations in ecosystem

functioning.”

Control and eradication important and recommended.Idea: Recover of indigenous species through eradication

Unintended consequences through removal of an alien transformer.

Page 3: Indirect effects of invasive species removal devastate World Heritage Islands Bergstrom et al., 2009, Journal of Applied Ecology

http://pawpeds.com/pawacademy/general/siberianexile/Sib1/SiberianExile6.jpg

Little Barrier Island

Page 4: Indirect effects of invasive species removal devastate World Heritage Islands Bergstrom et al., 2009, Journal of Applied Ecology

http://pawpeds.com/pawacademy/general/siberianexile/Sib1/SiberianExile6.jpg

X

Removal cats less breeding success of cooks petrel. Better after eradication of rats.

Little Barrier Island

Page 5: Indirect effects of invasive species removal devastate World Heritage Islands Bergstrom et al., 2009, Journal of Applied Ecology

Macquarie island

34 km long, cool maritime climate. Tundra like vegetation. (Tussock grass, mega-herbs and bryophytes)

Page 6: Indirect effects of invasive species removal devastate World Heritage Islands Bergstrom et al., 2009, Journal of Applied Ecology

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ICTVdb/Images/Murphy/Smallpoxns.jpg

http://www.biolib.cz/IMG/GAL/24877.jpg

Rabbits 1878, Cats 60 years before. Hyper-predation loss of two flightless bird species.Management: Virus vectored by flea: Rabbits populations decreased from 130 000 to 20 000. 2006 stop of virus spreading.

Page 7: Indirect effects of invasive species removal devastate World Heritage Islands Bergstrom et al., 2009, Journal of Applied Ecology
Page 8: Indirect effects of invasive species removal devastate World Heritage Islands Bergstrom et al., 2009, Journal of Applied Ecology

X

X

Hypothesis: Increased population due to eradication of top-level predator.

Page 9: Indirect effects of invasive species removal devastate World Heritage Islands Bergstrom et al., 2009, Journal of Applied Ecology

Cat predation and rabbit population estimates.

Estimates of consumption by cats of rabbits, rats and mice were calculated.

Based on cat daily food intake and proportion of food items in guts.

Rabbit populations: mean rabbit densities from 8 rabbit count areas.

Page 10: Indirect effects of invasive species removal devastate World Heritage Islands Bergstrom et al., 2009, Journal of Applied Ecology

Rabbit Population Change

Hypothesis: Population size increasing due to eradication of Top predator.

But also virus and climate variation might have influence.

Model: Rabbit abundance: dependent variablepresence / absence of virus + (season mean

temperature and precipitation): independent variable

Page 11: Indirect effects of invasive species removal devastate World Heritage Islands Bergstrom et al., 2009, Journal of Applied Ecology

In 2001 45 plots 5x5m, 2007 18 revisited.

Individual plant species cover as a percentage.

Vegetation Change

Page 12: Indirect effects of invasive species removal devastate World Heritage Islands Bergstrom et al., 2009, Journal of Applied Ecology

Use of remote sensing imagery

Satellite imagery:

Change Vector Analysis (CVA): Change measure

Difference in pixel intensity.

(100% from total absorption to total reflection)

Threshold for no change: 17%

Normalized Difference Vegetation Index

(NDVI): loss or gain of chlorophyll.

Page 13: Indirect effects of invasive species removal devastate World Heritage Islands Bergstrom et al., 2009, Journal of Applied Ecology

Results: Rabbit Population

Bergstrom et al. 2009

Page 14: Indirect effects of invasive species removal devastate World Heritage Islands Bergstrom et al., 2009, Journal of Applied Ecology

Results: Rabbit Population

cats present

virus present

?

Bergstrom et al. 2009

Page 15: Indirect effects of invasive species removal devastate World Heritage Islands Bergstrom et al., 2009, Journal of Applied Ecology

Results: Vegetation15 of 18 sampled plots changed significantly

loss of species cover, gain of new (smaller) taxa

Bergstrom et al. 2009, supporting information

Page 16: Indirect effects of invasive species removal devastate World Heritage Islands Bergstrom et al., 2009, Journal of Applied Ecology

Results: VegetationSubstantial island-wide vegetation change (36 % of island area)

NDVI Change CVA MagnitudeBergstrom et al. 2009, supporting information

Page 17: Indirect effects of invasive species removal devastate World Heritage Islands Bergstrom et al., 2009, Journal of Applied Ecology

Results

• Rabbit numbers returned to pre control levels

• increased herbivory caused significant damage (local and on landscape scale)

• Efforts to control rabbit population reversed in only 6 years

➡ strong top-down control of rabbits by a small cat population (ca. 160 adult cats)

Page 18: Indirect effects of invasive species removal devastate World Heritage Islands Bergstrom et al., 2009, Journal of Applied Ecology

Discussion

• Further effects of cat extinction– more rodents, further impacts on multiple

trophic levels– rabbit abundance also influences other

species (e.g. destroying petrel burrows, making them more vulnerable to attack by skuas)

– changes to soil structure & nutrient cycling

Page 19: Indirect effects of invasive species removal devastate World Heritage Islands Bergstrom et al., 2009, Journal of Applied Ecology

Implications for Management

• Appreciation of complex interactions

• more thorough assessment of ecological risks– general biology of the target species– interspecific interactions– trophic interactions

• better modeling of expected results

Page 20: Indirect effects of invasive species removal devastate World Heritage Islands Bergstrom et al., 2009, Journal of Applied Ecology

References

D.M. Bergstrom, A. Lucieer, K. Kiefer, J. Wasley, L. Belbin, T.K. Pedersen, & S.L. Chown. 2009. Indirect effects of invasive species removal devastate World Heritage Island. Journal of Applied Ecology 46: 73–81.

Supporting Information to the article, retrieved from http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/121638291/suppinfo on 18.03.2008

Page 21: Indirect effects of invasive species removal devastate World Heritage Islands Bergstrom et al., 2009, Journal of Applied Ecology

Questions ?